Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
16.413
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Cakrawala Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Undiksha Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Jurnal Sekolah Dasar Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Jurnal Infinity Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Sekolah Dasar (JP2SD) Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Kontinu: Jurnal Penelitian Didaktik Matematika AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematika EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan AKSIOMA Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual Prosiding SI MaNIs (Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika dan Nilai-Nilai Islami) Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori dan Praktik Pendidikan Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika AL ISHLAH Jurnal Pendidikan JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika) Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) JMPM: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika PRISMA JOHME: Journal of Holistic Mathematics Education Pi: Mathematics Education Journal JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika QARDHUL HASAN: MEDIA PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika EDUPEDIA JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan International Journal of Insights for Mathematics Teaching (IJOIMT) Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Jurnal Paedagogy Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru Padaringan : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Antropologi Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Early Childhood and Family Parenting Journal International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education JCP (Jurnal Cahaya Pendidikan) Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation (JODLI) Research and Development in Education (RaDEn) Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya Pi: Mathematics Education Journal Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology Jurnal MIPA dan Pembelajarannya MATHEdunesa International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research (IJTMER) Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia Jurnal Infinity Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif Journal on Mathematics Education
Cholis Sa’dijah
Universitas Negeri Malang
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 156 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 156 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
REFLECTIVE THINKING CHARACTERISTICS: A STUDY IN THE PROFICIENT MATHEMATICS PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS Cholis Sa'dijah; Muhammad Noor Kholid; Erry Hidayanto; Hendro Permadi
Jurnal Infinity Vol 9, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 9, NUMBER 2, INFINITY
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi and I-MES

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p159-172

Abstract

Reflective thinking begins with repeated confusion and evaluation to solve a problem. There are four aspects to reflective thinking, namely techniques, monitoring, insight, and conceptualization. However, the problem-solvers’ reflective thinking characteristics in mathematical problems have not been discovered. The study describes the reflective thinking characteristics of proficient mathematics prospective teachers based on four aspects. The qualitative research was conducted at Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta with a total of 64 reflective thinkers. Data collected by test, observation sheets, and interview methods. The tests were administered twice. The instruments developed has been through the validation process and declared valid. Data analyzed through the stages of reduction, presentation, and verification. We successfully conclude that proficient mathematics prospective teachers have complete and consistent reflective thinking characteristics. Further research can be focused on the characteristics of reflective thinking based on another aspect.
TEACHING HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS IN MATHEMATICS CLASSROOMS: GENDER DIFFERENCES Cholis Sa'dijah; Wasilatul Murtafiah; Lathiful Anwar; Rini Nurhakiki; Ety Tejo Dwi Cahyowati
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol 12, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Department of Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education, Sriwijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.12.1.13087.159-180

Abstract

This case study aims to explore how male and female Indonesian mathematics teachers enact decision-making processes in teaching High-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Non-random purposive sampling technique was used to select the participants. The participants involved in this study were two Indonesian mathematics teachers who teach HOTS in their classrooms. The participants were chosen from 87 Indonesian mathematics teachers in 23 secondary schools in East Java, Indonesia, who were invited to our survey and confirmed that they taught HOTS and underwent classroom observation. Data were collected from classroom teaching and interview sessions. The data of classroom teaching consisted of a video-audio recording of two meetings and field notes of observation. In the interview session, we recorded the teachers’ responses during semi-structured interviews. We coded and explained our interpretation for each code. We also conducted investigator triangulation by comparing coding and interpretation made by two researchers and discussing them to find the best representation of the meaning of the data. Our findings indicate that both male and female teachers performed four steps of decision making, consisting of giving problems, asking students to solve, checking, and obtaining new ideas. The difference of male and female teachers’ decision-making process is observed in the process of giving problem (non-contextual vs contextual), how they ask students to solve and check the solution (individual vs group), and the criteria of the new idea of problem-solving (correct vs the best solution). The study findings can be a catalyst for enacting decision-making steps in teaching HOTS. Also, these can be a reflective practice for mathematics teachers to improve their teaching quality.
EXPLORING THE EXPLANATION OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHER IN MATHEMATICS TEACHING PRACTICE Wasilatul Murtafiah; Cholis Sa'dijah; Tjang Daniel Chandra; Susiswo Susiswo; Abdur Rahman As'ari
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol 9, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Department of Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education, Sriwijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.9.2.5388.259-270

Abstract

This study aims to describe the types of explanations made by pre-service teachers in mathematics learning. In this research, the types of explanations are used to describe the explanatory trends used by pre-service teachers in mathematics teaching. The descriptive qualitative research was chosen in this research. The research subjects are pre-service teacher as the students of Mathematics Education of PGRI Madiun University and Madura University who are studying Field Experience Practice. Of the 105 mathematics student, five students with a cumulative grade achievement of more than 3.50 were observed during the teaching practice at the school for approximately five meetings. The research data was obtained from observation, video recording, and interview. Data analysis was done through data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion/verification focused on pre-service teacher explanation on mathematics learning activity. The research findings indicate that the explanation used by the pre-service teacher in the mathematics learning starting from the most frequently used is the descriptive explanation (51,7%), giving of reason (36,2%) and interpretative (12,1%). Descriptive explanations are used to describe mathematical procedures. The type of reason-giving explanation is used to explain reasons based on mathematical principles. Furthermore, the interpretative explanation is used to explain the concepts and facts of mathematics.
CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS’ ABDUCTIVE REASONING IN SOLVING ALGEBRA PROBLEMS Indriati Nurul Hidayah; Cholis Sa'dijah; Subanji Subanji; Sudirman Sudirman
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol 11, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Department of Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education, Sriwijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.11.3.11869.347-362

Abstract

When students solve an algebra problem, students try to deduce the facts in the problem. This step is imperative, students can draw conclusions from the facts and devise a plan to solve the problem. Drawing conclusions from facts is called reasoning. Some kinds of reasoning are deductive, inductive, and abductive. This article explores the characteristics of some types of abductive reasoning used by mathematics education students in problem-solving related to using facts on the problems. Fifty-eight students were asked to solve an algebra problem. It was found that the student’s solutions could be grouped into four types of abductive reasoning. From each group, one student was interviewed to have more details on the types. First, the creative conjectures type, the students can solve the problems and develop new ideas related to the problems; second, fact optimization type, the students make conjecture of the answer, then confirm it by deductive reasoning; third, factual error type, students use facts outside of the problems to solve it, but the facts are wrong; and fourth,  mistaken fact type, the students assume the questionable thing as a given fact. Therefore, teachers should encourage the students to use creative conjectures and fact optimization when learning mathematics.
COMPARING MODEL-BUILDING PROCESS: A MODEL PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS USED IN INTERPRETING STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL THINKING Mujiyem Sapti; Purwanto Purwanto; Edy Bambang Irawan; Abdur Rahman As'ari; Cholis Sa'dijah; Susiswo Susiswo; Ariyadi Wijaya
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol 10, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Department of Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education, Sriwijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.10.2.7351.171-184

Abstract

Mathematical thinking is an important aspect of mathematics education and, therefore, also needs to be understood by prospective teachers. Prospective teachers should have the ability to analyze and interpret students’ mathematical thinking. Comparing model is one of the interpretation models from Wilson, Lee, and Hollebrands. This article will describe the prospective teacher used the model of the building process in interpretation students' mathematical thinking. Subjects selected by considering them in following the students’ strategies in solving the Building Construction Problem. Comparing model is a model of interpretation in which a person interprets student thinking based on student work. There are two types comparing model building process prospective teacher use in interpreting students’ mathematical thinking ie. comparing work and comparing knowledge. In comparing works, prospective teachers use an external representation rubric. This is used to analyze student activities in order to provide an interpretation that is comparing the work of students with their own work. In comparing knowledge, prospective teachers use internal representation rubrics to provide interpretation by comparing the students' work with their knowledge or thought.
PROFIL KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS PESERTA DIDIK DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH SOAL CERITA Chusnul Ma'rifah; Cholis Sa’dijah; Subanji Subanji; Toto Nusantara
Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika Vol 8, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2 DESEMBER 2020
Publisher : IAIN Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/eds.v8i2.1991

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan kemampuan komunikasi matematis peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pada materi barisan dan deret. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif kualitiatif serta menggunakan metode survey. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah 15 peserta didik MAN 3 Malang yang terbagi dalam kelompok berkemampuan komunikasi matematis tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Dari masing-masing kelompok, diambil satu subyek untuk dideskripsikan kemampuan komunikasi matematisnya. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa peserta didik dengan kemampuan komunikasi matematis tinggi memiliki kemampuan komunikasi matematis yang baik dalam representasi penyelesaian masalah soal cerita dan dalam mengomunikasikan hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan soal dengan simbol matematis. Untuk peserta didik berkemampuan komunikasi matematis sedang, cenderung melakukan kesalahan dalam menulis representasi penyelesaian masalah, serta sudah dapat menuliskan hal-hal yang diketahui, ditanya, dan kesimpulan dengan menggunakan simbol matematis secara benar. Adapun untuk peserta didik dengan komunikasi matematis rendah, bawah belum dapat memenuhi keduanya.
DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ ANALOGICAL REASONING THROUGH ALGEBRAIC PROBLEMS Siti Lailiyah; Toto Nusantara; Cholis Sa'dijah; Edy Bambang Irawan
Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Vol 5, No 2: June 2017
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (448.379 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/jps.v5i2.9020

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims at discussing the understanding and definition of analogy reasoning ability including the example of how analogy reasoning ability is formulated in the form of analogy reasoning components and its indicators. This study was a qualitative design research. The data obtained in this study was collected from Mathematic assignment exercise sheets. The source of the data was obtained from think alouds, transcribed interview, and video during assignment completion and interview. The data obtained, then, were analyzed using interactive qualitative analysis technique. The result of this study was examined and described qualitatively. In accordance with the theoretical framework established, the results of this study are described in three groups classification which possess different characteristics such as internal structurization, connective external structurization, and extension external structurization.Key Words: competence of reasoning, analogy reasoning, algebra problem Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah membahas pengertian dan definisi kemampuan penalaran analogi disertai dengan contoh bagaimana kompetensi penalaran analogi tersebut dirumuskan dalam bentuk komponen-komponen penalaran analogi serta indikatornya. Jenis penelitian ini termasuk penelitian kualitatif. Data yang dikumpulkan dalam penelitian ini berasal dari data hasil lembar tugas matematika. Sumber data dalam penelitian ini berasal dari hasil thinks alouds, wawancara yang ditranskripkan, dan video selama subjek mengerjakan lembar tugas serta wawancara. Data yang telah terkumpul dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik analisis kualitatif dengan model teknik analisis interaktif. Hasil penelitian ini dikaji dan dideskripsikan secara kualitatif. Berdasarkan kerangka teori yang dibangun, hasil penelitian ini dipaparkan dalam tiga kelompok yang memiliki karakteristik berbeda yaitu penstrukturan internal, penstrukturan eksternal konektif, dan penstrukturan eksternal ekstensi.Kata kunci: kemampuan penalaran, penalaran analogi, masalah aljabar
Mathematical Creative Thinking Leveling on Non-Mathematics Department Students Flavia Aurelia Hidajat; Cholis Sa’dijah; Susiswo Susiswo; Sudirman Sudirman; Abdur Rahman As’ari
Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Vol 6, No 1: March 2018
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1364.344 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/jps.v6i1.11598

Abstract

Abstract: This paper seeks to explore and describe a mathematical characteristic of creative thinking level on non-mathematics department students. This paper took 56 college students of Faculty of Economy at University X as a research subject. The data were obtained through the test, interview, and observation. This research dealt with the five existing level and two additional level of creative thinking. The results indicated two additions of creative thinking leveling, namely level 5 which included the ability of students to elaborate ideas and be fluent in various problem solutions; and Level 6 which includes the ability of students to carry out idea elaboration, fluency, and flexibility in a variety of problem-solving strategies. Elaboration of ideas means that students are able to describe, develop previous ideas, and add some new ideas for the solutions generated.Key Words: creative thinking level, creative thinking, non-mathematics studentsAbstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi dan menggambarkan karakteristik tingkat berpikir kreatif matematis pada mahasiswa departemen non-matematika. Penelitian ini mengambil 56 mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi di Universitas X sebagai subjek penelitian. Data diperoleh melalui tes, wawancara, dan observasi. Data tersebut berupa deskripsi naratif. Penelitian ini menggunakan lima tingkat berpikir kreatif yang sudah ada dan dua tingkat tambahan. Hasilnya menunjukkan dua penambahan tingkat berpikir kreatif, yaitu tingkat 5 yang termasuk kemampuan siswa untuk mengelaborasi ide dan fasih dalam berbagai solusi masalah; dan tingkat 6 yang mencakup kemampuan siswa untuk melaksanakan elaborasi ide, kelancaran, dan fleksibilitas dalam berbagai strategi pemecahan masalah. Elaborasi ide berarti bahwa siswa mampu menggambarkan, mengembangkan ide-ide sebelumnya, dan menambahkan beberapa ide baru untuk solusi yang dihasilkan.Kata kunci: tingkat berpikir kreatif, berpikir kreatif, mahasiswa non-matematika
Proses Berpikir Siswa Field Dependent dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tahapan Polya Agus Hidayat; Cholis Sa'dijah; I Made Sulandra
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan Vol 4, No 7: JULI 2019
Publisher : Graduate School of Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (811.696 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/jptpp.v4i7.12634

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to describe the thinking process of field dependent students in solving geometric problems based on the Polya stage. The type of research used was descriptive qualitative. The study was conducted at SMA 1 Pasuruan using 2 subjects in the cognitive style FD taken from 38 students. The instruments used were in the form of cognitive style exams, solving geometrical problems and interview guidelines. The results of the study show that in processing information, the subject of FD does not understand the problem as a whole so that in planning the completion of the subject FD forgets about the concept of the cube. Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan proses berpikir siswa field dependent dalam menyelesaikan masalah geometri berdasarkan tahapan Polya. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Penelitian dilakukan di SMA Negeri 1 Pasuruan dengan menggunakan dua subjek bergaya kognitif FD yang diambil dari 38 siswa. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa eksamen gaya kognitif, penyelesaian masalah geometri dan pedoman wawancara. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa dalam memproses informasi, subjek FD tidak memahami masalah secara utuh sehingga dalam merencanakan penyelesaian subjek FD lupa tentang konsep kubus.
Media Permainan Kartu Domino untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berhitung Konversi Pecahan Desimal Siswa Kelas IV Firman Tsabbit Abqari; Edy Bambang Irawan; Cholis Sa’dijah
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan Vol 3, No 9: SEPTEMBER 2018
Publisher : Graduate School of Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (644.179 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/jptpp.v3i9.11550

Abstract

Abstract: This research describe the usage of media player Domino Card to increase soft skills in a counting convertion fraction-desimal. The mathematics learning in elementary school expected the students skilled counting fraction-decimal. Media player of Domino Card arrange to increase skilled on convertion fraction-decimal and help student active on mathematic learning. This study is a classroom action research, conducted during two cycles. This action research consists of four steps, (1) planning, (2) acting, (3) observing, and (4) reflecting. Result of the research show with using Domino Card as media game, students skilled counting convertion fraction-decimal. Abstrak: Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan penggunan media permainan kartu Domino untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berhitung konversi pecahan-desimal. Pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar, diharapkan siswa terampil berhitung konversi pecahan-desimal. Media permainan kartu domino dirancang untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berhitung konversi pecahan-desimal dan membantu siswa aktif dalam belajar matematika. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian tindakan kelas yang dilaksanakan selama dua siklus. Penelitian tindakan ini terdiri dari empat langkah, yaitu (1) perencanaan, (2) pelaksanaan, (3) observasi, dan (4) refleksi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan dengan menggunakan media permainan kartu domino siswa terampil berhitung konversi pecahan-desimal.
Co-Authors Abdul Halim Abdullah Abdul Haris Rosyidi Abdul Haris Rosyidi Abdul Jamil Abdur Rahman As’ari Abdur Rohim Agus Hidayat Agus Setiawan Ahmad Farid Haebah Ahyansyah, Ahyansyah Ainun Naziya Rohmah Akhmad Riandy Agusta Akmalia, Yuyun Alfiani Athma Putri Rosyadi Alifiana Mareta Anggara Dwinata Anita Dewi Utami Aribowo, Bayu Exsanty Arif Yunet Priyo Tatagno Arik Murwanto Ariyadi Wijaya Arnellis, Arnellis Asih Kurnia Asih Aynin Mashfufah Azizah Nur Laily Rahmawati Bagus Cahyanto Chusnul Ma'rifah Chusnul Ma'rifah Dedi Kuswandi Deni Hamdani Desyandri Desyandri Dewi Astutik Dewi Astutik Dewi, Aulia Rahma Dian Wardhani Dyah Triwahyuningtyas Dyah Triwahyuningtyas Dyaswardani, Hapsari Eddy Sutadji Edy Bambang Irawan Eka Damayanti Eka Damayanti Eko Waluyo Emy Yunita Rahma Pratiwi Erry Hidayanto Ery Tri Djatmika RWW Ety Tejo Dwi Cahyowati Fatikh Inayahtur Rahma Fimmatur Rizka Ardina Fimmatur Rizka Ardina, Fimmatur Rizka Firdaus Dyah Utami Firdha Mahrifatul Zana Firdha Mahrifatul Zana Firman Tsabbit Abqari Fithriyah, Inayatul Fitri Kumalasari Flavia Aurelia Hidajat, Flavia Aurelia Galuh Putri, Yuniar Heksaria Hajjah Rafiah Hanurawan, Fattah Heni Pujiastuti Henry Praherdhiono Henry Praherdhiono Herawati Susilo Heri Setiawan Heri Susanto Herti Prastitasari Hery Susanto Hery Susanto Hidayah, Irma Rachmah Himmatul Ulya Huljannah, Miftha Husniyah, Hana Kholifatul I Ketut Suada I Made Arnawa I Made Sulandra I Wayan Dasna Ika Ratih Sulistiani Imam Rofiki Imelda Dastania Pradani Imro'atul Mubarokah Imro'atul Mubarokah Indriati Nurul Hidayah Intan Sari Rufiana Istiqomah, Roshydatul Itsnaniya Fatwa Nurani Khafidhoh Nurul Aini Khalimatus Syuhriyah Khusnil Khatimah Khusnul Khotimah Kristayulita Kristayulita Kumala, Shifni Afida Kusumaningtyas, Nopem Lathiful Anwar Latifah, Eka Ratna Anjanuarti Laurentcia Noviafta Widya Lenita Puspitasari Luluk Faridatuz Zuhroh Luluk Wahyu Nengsih M. Misbachul Huda Maimunah Maimunah Maimunah, Maimunah Makbul Muksar Makbul Muksar Mandala, Arif Sapta Martini Dwi Purnama Maulidiyah Tutut Nurjanah Mayangsari, Aprilia Dwi Miftha Huljannah Mila Sekar Ayu Mohamad Aminudin Mohammad Akbar Mubarokah, Imro'atul Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad Muhammad Ainur Rizqi Muhammad Kharis Muhammad Noor Kholid Muhana Gipayana Muhana Gipayana Mujiyem Sapti Mujiyem Sapti Mukhlis Mukhlis Mulia, Abigail Christina Murpratiwi, Gendis Nafi Isbadrianingtyas Nazila Naf’atu Fina Nita Retno Wahyuningati Novitasari, Herawati Nugraheni, Dinda Dwi Nur Inayah Ahlan Nur Kharisma Widya Agustin Nurrahmawati Nurrahmawati Nurrahmawati Nurul Audhifa Utami Oktaviana, Lucky Tri P Purwanto Permadi, Hendro Pity Asriani Pranata, Syalshabil Shafa Pratama Fitri Syadidah Punaji Setyosari Punaji Setyosari Purnomo, Purnomo Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Purwosetiyono, Fransiskus Xaverius Didik Puspitasari, Septi Putri Intan Permatasari Putri, Novi Rahmadani Putri, Novi Rahmadhani Qohar, Abd. Rahmawati, Azizah Nur Laily Ramdhan Fazrianto Suwarman Ratri Rahayu Renika Arisinta Resyarusyda Parandrengi Ria Norfika Yuliandari Rini Nurhakiki Risa Utaminingsih Rizka Riana Rizka Zulvana Wardhani Rizky Nova Damayanti Rizqi, Muhammad Ainur Rustanto Rahardi Rustanto Rahardi Sa'dun Akbar Saiful Anwar Saputri, Risma Rintias Sari, Feti Eka Ratna Sari, Marinda Rosita Satrio Agung Prabowo Sepharyanto Sepharyanto Sisworo Sisworo Sisworo Sisworo, S Siti Chusnia Siti Lailiyah Siti Salina Mustakim Sri Rahayuningsih Sri Subarinah Styo Mahendra Wasita Aji Subanji Subanji Subanji Suci Zuhriati Sudirman Sudirman Sudirman Sudirman Sudirman Suherman, Suherman Sukoriyanto Sukoriyanto Sukoriyanto Sumarmi Susiswo Suwanti, Vivi Suwito, Ruth Widyati Swasono Rahardjo Syaiful Hadi Syamsul Hadi Syifa’ul Amamah Tatik Retno Murniasih Titik Harsiati Tjang Daniel Chandra Tomi Listiawan Toto Nusantara Ucik Fitri Handayani Vinarahmah, Aula Rizqi Vita Kusumasari Wahyu Nurlaili Wasilatul Murtafiah Widi Ardianto Wikan Budi Utami Yerizon Yerizon Yudhi Hanggara Zana, Firdha Mahrifatul Zukhrufurrohmah, Zukhrufurrohmah Zulnaidi, Hutkemri