Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2021 - 2026

4.058

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

Budi Usodo

Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

Author-ID : 408357

Arts Humanities Education Engineering Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 153 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

1 2 3 4 5

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN EVERYONE IS A TEACHER HERE DAN THINK PAIR SHARE PADA MATERI KPK DAN FPB DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA Laila, Nur Anida; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The aims of this research were to determine:Â (1) which had better learning achievement among students taught by using learning model Think Pair Share with Everyone is a Teacher Here (TPSÂ with ETH), Think Pair Share (TPS), or direct instruction, (2) which had Â better learning achievement, students with motivation level of high, medium, or low (3) at each of the learning model, which had better learning achievement, students with motivation level of high, medium, or low,Â (4) at each of the motivation level, which had better learning achievement among students who taught by using learning model TPS with ETH with TPS, or direct intruction. Â Based on the test hypothesis, it could be concluded as follows. (1) Cooperative learningÂ model TPS with ETH produces learning achievement better than the model of TPS and direct learning. TPS learning produces better achievement than direct learning models. (2) The mathematics learning achievement of students with high motivation is better than those with moderate and low motivation. The mathematics learning achievement of students with moderate motivation is better than those with low motivation. (3) At the TPS with ETH learning and direct instruction, the mathematics learning achievement of students with high motivation is as same as those with moderate motivation. Similarly, mathematics learning achievement of students with moderate motivation is as same as those with low motivation. While in the case of the TPS learning, the learning achievement of students with high motivation is as same as those with moderate motivation. Similarly, the mathematics achievement of students with the moderate motivation is the same as students with low motivation. However, the mathematics achievement of students with high motivation is better than thoese with low motivation. (4) For students with high and moderate motivation, the learning achievement of students taught with TPS learning with ETH is the same as those with those taught with merely TPS and direct learning. In the other hand TPS with ETH gives good impsct to the learning achievement than direct learning.Â On the case of studentâs low motivation TPS with ETH shows that the use two of the method gives good impact in the same with the student treated with TPS or direct learning.Keywords: TPS with ETH, TPS, direct learning, and Studentâs Learning Motivation

PROFIL PEMECAHAN MASALAH SISWA TUNA GRAHITA PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN FORMAL DAN PENDEKATAN FORMAL DIVARIASI PENDEKATAN FUNGSIONAL Anggraeny, Vivi Fenty; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (268.12 KB)

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) the profile of problem solving in mathematics of a deaf child in solving the geometrics problems with the learning using the formal approach; and (2) the profile of problem solving in mathematics of a deaf child in solving the geometrics problems with the learning using the formal approach varied with the functional approach. This research used the qualitative explorative research method. The subject of the research consisted of one deaf male student and was taken by using the purposive sampling technique. The subject was determined according to the following considerations: (1) the student had not too few and not too many incorrect answers; and (2) he could communicate well based on the information obtained from his teacher. The data of the profile of problem solving in mathematics were gathered through test and interview with the student on how to solve the test problems. The data were validated by using the time triangulation. They were analyzed by using the interactive model of analysis consisting of the following measures: data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results of the research Â were as follows: 1) The problem solving in Mathematics of the deaf child with the learning using the formal approach results in the following findings: (a) recognizing some colors when they are the colors of flat structures; (b) being difficult to understand the meanings of questions if they contain more than one answer; (c) being unable to recognize some spatial structures well; (d) being unable to use ruler; and (e) unable to differentiate the letters well. 2) The problem solving in mathematics of the deaf child with the learning using the formal approach varied with the functional results in the following findings: (a) at the beginning the child is difficult to recognize some of the spatial structures, but after having practiced drawing with colors and then compared them with the ones in the spatial structure learning, that is the ones in the test problems and the ones in the learning instruments, he gradually recognizes the spatial structure; (b) principally he can recognize the spatial structures, but when the spatial structures are put vertically and horizontally, he feels difficult to recognize them; (c) the students is difficult to count the number of sides of quadrangle pyramid ; and (d) he is difficult to understand the meanings of questions so that the answers given are not synchronized with the questions.Keywords : Profile, problem solving, deaf, formal approach, and functional approach

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN THINKING ALOUD PAIRS PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SIKAP PERCAYA DIRI SISWA SMPN KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Yanuarti, Maghfiroh; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (501.988 KB)

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the self confidence of the students. The learning models compared were Think Pair Share (TPS) Â model, Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem (TAPPS) model, and conventional model. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3Ã3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Sukoharjo. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 302 students; consisted of 100 students in the first experimental class, 101 in the second experimental class, and 101 students in control class. The instruments used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and questionnaire of self confidence. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it showed that the data had same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It showed that three classes had balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed that: (1) TPS model had better learning achievement than TAPPS model and conventional model, TAPPS model had better learning achievement than conventional model. (2) the students having high self confidence had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self confidence, the students having medium and low self confidence had equally mathematics learning achievement. (3) there was an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the self confidence on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the student.Keywords:Think Pair Share (TPS), Think Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (TAPPS), mathematics learning achievement, and self confidence.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK SISWA SMP NEGERI KELAS VIII SEKOTA MADIUN Pradana, Lingga Nico; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (327.797 KB)

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models viewed from the student multiply intellegence. The learning models compared were NHT-CTL, NHT and direct instruction. This research Â was a quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3x4. The population of this research was all students class VIII in SMP Negeri at Madiun City. The sampling technique using a stratified cluster random sampling. Samples in this research were 266 students with 91 students as experimental class I, 88 students as experimental class II and 87 students as control class. Data collection methods used documentation, tests and questionnaires method. Hypothesis testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testing were concluded that: (1) NHT-CTL learning model gave better achievement than NHT learning model and direct instruction, while NHT learning model and direct instruction gave the same achievement, (2) students with type linguistic, logical-mathematical, interpersonal, and spatial had the same achievement, (3) on each type of multiple intelligences, NHT-CTL learning model gave better achievement than NHT learning model and direct instruction, while NHT learning model and direct instruction gave the same achievement, (4) on each models of learning, learning achievement of students with linguistic, logical-mathematical, interpersonal, and spatial had the same achievement.Keywords: cooperative learning NHT, CTL approaches, multiple intelligences, learning achievement

STUDI IMPLEMENTASI PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA PADA KELAS CERDAS ISTIMEWA BAKAT ISTIMEWA (CIBI) SMP NEGERI 2 SURAKARTA Munawaroh, Munawaroh; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (253.118 KB)

Abstract: The objective of research was to describe the implementation of character education to mathematics learning, the constraints the teacher faced and the solution the teachers took to the constraints with the implementation of character education in mathematics learning in the gifted and talented class of SMP Negeri 2 Surakarta. This study was a descriptive qualitative research; the subject of researcher was one mathematics teacher Â and six students in the grade VII gifted and talented class. Techniques of validating data used were researcher persistence and time triangulation. Techniques of analyzing data used were (1) data reduction, (2) data display, and (3) conclusion drawing and verification. The results of research are as follows. 1) The process of character education implementation to learning was below. (a) The development of logical, critical, creative and innovative thinking character was conducted by means of assignment, directing the students to the correct answer and to make decision with debriefing. (b) The development of hard work character was conducted by means of group assignment. (c) The development of curiosity character was conducted by providing the example of material existing in real life. (d) The development of independency character was conducted by assigning the material reading to be discussed in the next meeting. (e) The development of self-confidence character was conducted by means of facilitating the students writing the result on the blackboard. 2) The constraints the teacher faced and the solutions the teacher took were as follows. (a) In the implementation of logical, critical, creative and innovative thinking character, the students monopolized actively the debriefing process so that the teacher should limit and provide other students the opportunity of asking question. (b) In the implementation of hard work character, not all students in the classroom had equal hard work ethos. The solutions taken were to play motivation video and to convince them about the ability they had, to display the studentsâ work, and to reward the students with the best performance. (c) In the implementation of curiosity character, the students who did not want to think too hard responded poorly to the stimulus given. In this case, the teacher could give reward in the form of mark (grade). (d) In the implementation of self-confidence character, the students with less self-confidence would select the easy assignment in presenting the group assignment, and they explained in very soft voice. The solutions taken were to give more mark to the students explaining group assignment, and to direct the students in the presentation. For teacher independency character, the teacher did not face a significant constraint.Keywords: Implementation, Character Education, Gifted and Talented Class.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SQUARE DENGAN METODE QUESTION STUDENT HAVE DAN THINK TALK WRITE PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SLEMAN TP 2013/2014 AsyÃ¢Â€Â™ari, AsyÃ¢Â€Â™ari; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (331.424 KB)

Abstract: The objektive of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from learning independence of the students. The learning models compared were the TPSq learning model with the question student have method, the TTW learning model, and the conventional learning model. This study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3Ã3 factorial design. The study population was all of grade VIII students of State Junior Secondary School in Sleman regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples in this study amounted to 262 students with the details of 87 students for experiment 1 and 87 for experiments 2 and 88 for the control class. The data collected instrument used mathematics achievement tests and a questionnaire of studentâs learning Â independence. Based on the hypothesis testing can be concluded as follows. (1) The learning achievement of the students treated with TPSq learning modelÂ with the question student have method was as good as that ofÂ those with the TTW learning model. In addition, studentsâ learning achievement treated by TPSq model with question student have method and TTW better than students treated by conventional learning model. (2) Studentsâ learning achievement which has high learning independence had better achievement than students who have moderate and low independence. In addition, students who have moderate learning independence had better achievement than students who have low learning independence. (3) In the TPSq learning model with the question student have method, TTW and conventional learning model, the studentsâ learning achievement who have high learning independence had better achievement than moderate and low learning independence, in addition the studentsâ learning achievement who have moderate learning independence had better achievement than students who have low learning independence. (4) In the learning independence category of high, moderate or low, the learning achievement of the students treated with TPSq learning model with the question student have method and TTW learning model was equally good. In addition, studentsâ learning achievement treated by TPSqÂ learning model with the question student have method and TTW learning model had better achievement than students treated by conventional learning model.Keywords: Think Pair Square (TPSq), Question Student Have, Think Talk Write (TTW), and Studentâs Learning Independence.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PROBLEM POSING PADA POKOK BAHASAN PELUANG DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS XI SMK DI KABUPATEN BOYOLALI TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014 Bahktiar, Hidayat; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (435.783 KB)

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of Think Pair Share (TPS) with Problem Posing, Think Pair Share (TPS) or conventional, (2) which one have better in mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (3) in each learning model, which one have better mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (4) in each studentâs level of Adversity Quotient which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing, TPS or conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students class XI majors group technology, health and agriculture of SMK in Boyolali. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the documentation of mathematics achievement, questionnaire of Adversity Quotient and test of mathematics achievement. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows: (1) learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than model of TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional, (2) the students having climbers and campers had same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had betterÂ achievement than those having quitters, (3) in each learning model, the students having climbers and campers had the same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better achievement than those having quitters, (4) in each Adversity Quotient, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional.Key words: Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Posing, and Adversity Quotient (AQ)

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SIKAP SISWA TERHADAP MATEMATIKA DAN PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA SMP NE Ardianzah, Ferri; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (517.36 KB)

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of cooperatif learning models viewed from the attitude of students. The learning model compared were TAI-CTL, TAI and direct instruction. This was quasi-experimental research designed by factorial 3x3. The population was 8th grade students of junior high school even semester academic year 2013/2014 in Magetan regency. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling. Total sample was 231 students, consisted of 77 students as TAI-CTL class, 78 students as TAI class, and 76 students as direct instruction class. Hypothesis testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testing, it is concluded that: (1) students learns using TAI-CTL and TAI had better achievement than students learnt using direct instruction, students learnt using TAI-CTL had better achievement than students learnt using TAIÂ (2) positive attitude students had better achievement than those of neutral and negative attitudestudents, neutral attitude students had better achievement than negative attitude students (3) for TAI-CTL and TAI, students with positive attitude had better achievement than neutral and negative attitude, however neutral attitude students had the same achievement as negative attitude students, for direct instruction, positive attitude students had the same achievement as neutral attitude students, meanwhile positive attitude students had better achievement than negative attitudeand students with neutral attitude had the same achievement as negative attitude students (4) for Â positive attitude students, students learnt using TAI-CTL had the same achievement as students learnt using TAI, meanwhile students learnt using TAI-CTL and TAI had better achievement than students learnt using direct instruction, for neutral and negative attitude students, students learnt using TAI-CTL, TAI, and direct instruction had the same achievement.Keywords: TAI-CTL, TAI, Direct Instruction, Attitude

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PROBLEM POSING TIPE WITHIN SOLUTION POSING, TIPE PRE SOLUTION POSING DAN TIPE POST SOLUTION POSING PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN BANJARNEGARA Santosa, Farah Heniati; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (279.11 KB)

Abstract: This aims of the research were to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from reasoning ability of thr students. The learning models compared were the Problem Posing model type: Within Solution Posing, Pre Solution Posing, Post Solution Posing and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 4x3. The population of the research was all students in Grade VIII of Junior Secondary Schools of Banjarnegara Regency. The samples of the research were chosen by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 316 students. The instruments used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and test of reasoning ability. Pre-requisite tests used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it shows that the populations have same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data were examined by using one-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. Hypothesis was examined by using two-way analysis of variance with unbalance cells followed multiple comparative test using Scheffe method. The result of the research showed as follows. (1) Problem Posing model type within solution posing gave better achievement than Problem Posing type Pre Solution Posing, type post Solution Posing and direct learning model, whereas Problem Posing model type Pre Solution Posing gave better achievement than Problem Posing type Post solution Posing and direct learning model. Meanwhile, Problem Posing model type Post Solution Posing gave better achievement than learning direct model. (2) Students who had high reasoning ability got better achievement than students who had medium or low reasoning ability, whereas students who had medium reasoning ability, got better achievement than students who had low reasoning ability.(3) in every learning model, students who had high reasoning ability got better achievement than students having medium or low reasoning ability. Meanwhile, students who had medium reasoning ability got better achievement than students who had low reasoning ability. (4) In every category of reasoning ability Problem Posing model type within solution posing gave better achievement than Problem Posing type Pre Solution Posing, type Post Solution Posing and direct learning model, whereas Problem Posing model type Pre Solution Posing gave better achievement than Problem Posing type Post solution Posing and direct learning model. Meanwhile, Problem Posing model type Post Solution Posing gave better achievement than direct learning model.Keyword: Problem Posing Type: Within Solution Posing, Pre Solution Posing, Post Solution Posing, mathematic achievement, and reasoning ability.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF STAD WITH GUIDED DISCOVERY LEARNING PADA MATERI POKOK LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) Suriyah, Puput; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (308.346 KB)

Abstract:Â The aims of thisÂ research were to know: (1) which one is providing better mathematics learning achievement, students taught using cooperative learning of STAD with guided discovery learning, STAD or direct learning, (2) which one is having better mathematics learning achievement, students with Adversity Quotient (AQ) climbers, students with AQ campers or students with AQ quitters, (3) at each learning model, whether there are any mathematics learning achievement difference between students with AQ climbers, students with AQ campers or students with AQ quitters, (4) at each type of Adversity Quotient (AQ), whether there are any mathematics learning achievement difference between students taught using cooperative learning of STAD with guided discovery learning, STAD or direct learning. This research was a quasi experimental research using 3x3 factorial designs. The hypotheses testing used two ways ANOVA with unbalanced cell. This research concludes that: (1) students taught using cooperative learning of STAD with Guided Discovery Learning have better mathematics learning achievement than the students taught using STAD and direct instruction, as well as students who were taught using STAD have better mathematics learning achievement than the group of students taught using direct instruction, (2) students achievement with the climbers type of AQ were better than the students with the campers and quitters type of AQ while the students with the campers type of AQ have better mathematics learning achievement than the students with the quitters type of AQ, (3) in the cooperative learning of STAD with guided discovery learning, there was no difference in learning achievement in each type of AQ, in the STAD, there was no difference in learning achievement in each type of AQ, in the direct instruction, students with climbers type of AQ have better mathematics learning achievement than students with quitters type of AQ, (4) for the students who have climbers type of AQ, there was no difference in learning achievement in each learning models, for the students who have campers type of AQ, STAD with guided discovery learning produced better mathematics achievement than direct instruction, for the students who have quitters type of AQ, STAD with guided discovery learning produced better mathematics achievement than direct instruction.Keywords: STAD With Guided Discovery Learning, Adversity Quotient, Mathematics Learning Achievement

Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Adi Nurcahyo Adwitiya Sarwahita, Salsabila Agnes Reswari Ingkansari Ahmad, Ahmad Ahmad, Ahmad Al Firdaus, Nabila Uristu Andhika, Niken Dwi Ardelia, Nadia Rizki Ardiyanto, David Ardiyanto, David Arianti Puspita Dewi Aritsya Imswatama Asrowi Asrowi Astri Wahyuni AsyÃ¢Â€Â™ari AsyÃ¢Â€Â™ari Asyâ€™ari, Asyâ€™ari Auliya, Anisa Rima Binti Anisaul Khasanah Brilliyanti, Fanny Brilliyanti, Fanny Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Cahyani, Apri Winar Chrisnawati, Henny Ekana Chrisnawati, Henny Ekana Chumdari Chumdari, Chumdari Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Dian Devita Yohanie Yohanie Dian Dwi Astutik, Dian Dwi Dian N Safitri Dian Panji Wicaksono Dian Ratna Puspananda Dwi A, Yuridis Madyarsa Dwi A, Yuridis Madyarsa E.P.U, Moertiningsih Edwin Latif Hardiyanto Eka Nur Azizah Endang Hariyati Ersam Mahendrawan Fahimah Andini Farah Heniati Santosa, Farah Heniati Farida Nurhasanah Ferri Ardianzah Fida Rahmantika Hadi, Fida Rahmantika Fitriana, Laila Fuany, Anggun Getut Pramesti Gunarhadi Gunarhadi, Gunarhadi Haniah, Wahyu Nur Harjati, Juliana Kristin Hendriyanto, Agus Henny Ekana Chrisnawati Heribertus Soegiyanto, Heribertus Hidayat Bahktiar, Hidayat Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh Iffah, Rona Dhiya Layli Ilham Rais A Imam Sujadi Ira Kurniawati Irene Endah Tri Winihati Isnaeni Umi Machromah Isnandar Iswanti, Partia Juniarto, Suci Juniati Juniati Karina Pramitasari, Karina Kartikaningtyas, Nafiqoh Elsa Kristiani, Theresia Kurniawati, Ira Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kuswardi, Yemi Kuswardi, Yemi Labiba Zahra, Labiba Lingga Nico Pradana Maghfiroh Yanuarti Manora, Yupi Ayu Maratu Shalikhah, Maratu Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Maullina, Eka Siti Mishbahul Huda, Mishbahul Mulyaningrum Lestari, Mulyaningrum Munawaroh Munawaroh Munzayanah, Nurul Murdoko, Yustinus Nada, Yusrina Qotrun Nahdiya, Nikmah Alfi Nansiana, Millenia Nadhea Nelly Indriastuti P Nindia Elisie Anggraini Nok Yeni Heryaningsih, Nok Yeni Novia Dwi Rahmawati Novia Fajar Utami Nugrohorini, Parwo Nunung Juwariah, Nunung Nur Anida Laila Nurlaily, Vivi Astuti Nurlaily, Vivi Astuti NURUL AZIZAH Nuryani Destiningsih, Nuryani Nyoto Nyoto, Nyoto Ony Syaiful Rizal, Ony Syaiful Paryatun, Suji Paryatun, Suji Permataari, Desty Ratna Pinilih, Anggoro Canggih Pramesthi, Getut Pramesti, Getut Pramudya, Ikrar Puput Suriyah Purnama, Agung Eka Purwaningsih, Tri Purwaningsih, Tri Rachmawati, Intan Rahayu, Heni Septi Rahayu, Nastiti Rahmat Winata Rahmawati, Retno Dwi Putri Rany Widyastuti Ratna Herawati Ratnasari Ratnasari Reka Pramukti, Reka Retnowati, Evi Riswandha, Septian Henry Rivia J, Hefin Dwi Riyadi . Riyadi Riyadi Rizqona Maharani, Rizqona Robia Astuti S Siswanto Sa'idah, Ulya Safitri, Rini Dewi Saki, Saki Salistiyani, Salistiyani Sandhy Prasetyo Tito Kurniawan, Sandhy Prasetyo Santosa, Eka Budhi Sarnoko Sarnoko, Sarnoko Sasongko, Anggi Setiaputra, Felix Indra Sholeh Muntasyir Sigit Pamungkas Siswanto Sri Adiningsih Sri Indayani, Sri Sri Subanti Sri Yamtinah Sudiyanto Sujadi, Imam Suryanto, Suryanto Susilawati, Dyah Sutopo Sutopo Sutopo, Sutopo Sutrisno Sutrisno Syarifah, Triana Jamilatus Tien Syarifah Hafidhah, Tien Syarifah Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Triyanto, Triyanto Tuti, Dewi Setyas Umi Fadlilah, Umi Veva, Ervina Yulias Vivi Fenty Anggraeny Wahartojo, Sri Wahyu Kusumaningtyas Wicaksana, Hafid Wicaksana, Hafid Wulandari, Lina Yemi Kuswardi, Yemi Yolan Kusumaningtyas, Yolan

Title

Found 153 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 153 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 153 Documents
Search