Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.861
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Jurnal Hukum Progresif Pandecta Abdimas Yustisia Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika Qistie: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Jurisprudence INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Halu Oleo Law Review Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services KRTHA BHAYANGKARA The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Law Research Review Quarterly Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Jurnal Esensi Hukum Pena : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review Arkus COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi JURNAL INOVASI DAN PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT INDONESIA PENA ABDIMAS : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat TRANSPUBLIKA INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH IN EXACT SCIENCES (TIRES) Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP) Maternity and Neonatal : Jurnal Kebidanan Journal of Administrative and Sosial Science (JASS) International Journal of Law Society Services Tsaqofah: Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia Jurnal Hukum Prioris Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora Jurnal Riptek Edutainment : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Kependidikan E-JRM Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Pendidikan (JURRIPEN) JOEEL (Journal of English Education and Literature) Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Annual Review of Legal Studies Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services "Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development " The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and legisprudence Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review Indonesia Media Law Review Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Sujud: Jurnal Agama, Sosial dan Budaya Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Law Research Review Quarterly Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Jurnal Abdimas Dosma Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Didakta: International Journal of Social Sciences, Language, and Education Resocia: International Journal of Applied Research and Innovation Indonesian Court and Justice Review Indonesian Minority Justice Review Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Human Rights Law and Policy
Cahya Wulandari
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 113 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 113 Documents
Search

 8   9   10   11   12 
The Legal Politics of Regulating Special Terrorism Crimes under Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code: Politik Hukum Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Khusus dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP Dede Indraswara; Cahya Wulandari; Muhammad Azil Maskur; Aisyah Nur Rafidah
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i1.3480

Abstract

Legal politics in the context of criminal law must be analyzed seriously, both in relation to material criminal law and formal criminal law. Law No. 5 of 2018 concerning Terrorism Crimes and Law No. 9 of 2013 concerning Terrorism Financing Crimes underwent changes after the enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (Indonesian Criminal Code). This amendment includes a bridge article relating to criminal acts of terrorism within the Criminal Code, which thus has implications for the elaboration of general and special rules. The purpose of this research is to find out how to use logical (Logische Specialiteit) or systematic (Systematische Specialiteit) specialties in interpreting this matter. The method used is juridical-normative with an analytical and conceptual approach based on various legal literature. This research obtained 2 (two) results, namely an explanation of the rules against terrorism in Indonesian positive law and an explanation of the bridging article in the reform of the Indonesian Criminal Code with logical specificity. So it is concluded that the regulation of special terrorism regulations in the Criminal Code does not mean that it weakens the Special Law, but instead strengthens these special regulations in the future if there is a criminal act of terrorism.
Reconstruction of Restorative Justice for Drug Users in Metro Jaya Police Jurisdiction Paramitha Aulia Putri Nandira; Masyhar, Ali; Wulandari, Cahya
Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/lg.v15i1.34385

Abstract

Drug abuse is a serious problem in Indonesia’s criminal justice system, which has traditionally been addressed through a repressive approach by treating drug users as offenders who must be punished. This approach is considered ineffective because it does not address the root cause of drug dependency. Therefore, restorative justice has emerged as an alternative approach that emphasizes recovery through rehabilitation mechanisms. This study aims to analyze the implementation of restorative justice for drug users within the jurisdiction of the Metro Jaya Regional Police and to formulate a more effective policy reconstruction based on humanitarian principles. This research employs empirical legal research with a socio-legal approach by collecting primary data through interviews with law enforcement officers and observations at the Directorate of Narcotics Investigation of the Metro Jaya Regional Police, as well as secondary data from legislation, legal literature, and institutional reports. The findings show that restorative justice has been implemented through an integrated assessment mechanism that directs drug users to medical and social rehabilitation programs. However, its implementation still faces challenges, including limited rehabilitation facilities, suboptimal inter-agency coordination, and differing paradigms among law enforcement officers. This study proposes reconstruction through strengthening rehabilitation regulations, optimizing assessment mechanisms, improving rehabilitation capacity, transforming law enforcement paradigms, and strengthening inter-agency coordination. This reconstruction is expected to enhance the implementation of restorative justice and create a more humane, recovery-oriented law enforcement system.
The Evolution of Corporate Criminal Liability in Indonesia: A Theoretical and Comparative Analysis of Judgment No. 1405 K/Pid.Sus/2013 and the 2023 Criminal Code Deo Renaldi Saputra; Ali Masyhar; Cahya Wulandari
International Journal of Applied Research and Innovation Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): April: Resocia: International Journal of Applied Research and Innovation
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/1egvns71

Abstract

This study examines the evolution of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia through a theoretical and comparative analysis of Supreme Court Decision Number 1405 K/Pid.Sus/2013 and the regulatory framework introduced by Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code. The research aims to analyze how the construction of corporate liability has developed from a model centered on individual attribution of fault toward a more systemic and organizational form of responsibility. This study employs normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The primary legal materials include the Supreme Court decision and relevant statutory provisions governing corporate criminal liability, while secondary materials consist of scholarly articles and legal literature discussing modern corporate liability doctrines. The findings show that the Supreme Court decision still relies on identification theory, where the actions and intentions of corporate managers are attributed to the corporation. In contrast, the 2023 Criminal Code introduces broader parameters of liability, including failure to prevent, omission, and control by beneficial owners. This shift reflects a significant transformation toward organizational liability, strengthening the effectiveness of criminal law enforcement against corporate crimes in Indonesia
REHABILITASI ATAU PIDANA? STUDI KRITIS RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA BERBASIS TEORI PEMIDANAAN INTEGRATIF Ginta Amelia Cahya; Ali Masyhar; Cahya Wulandari
Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 14 No. 6 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2026.v14.i06.p08

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kerangka regulasi keadilan restoratif di Indonesia, menelusuri landasan teoretis yang menopangnya, serta mengkaji penerapannya dalam penanganan perkara penyalahgunaan narkotika pada tahap penyidikan kepolisian. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, melalui telaah bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan komparasi hukum. Temuan penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa keadilan restoratif telah mendapatkan legitimasi normatif melalui berbagai instrumen hukum, di antaranya Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Perpol Nomor 8 Tahun 2021, Peraturan Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020, Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2024, serta semakin terpadukan dalam KUHP Nasional dan KUHAP (UU No. 20 Tahun 2025). Dari sudut pandang teoretis, orientasi pemidanaan mengalami transformasi dari paradigma retributif ke arah pendekatan yang lebih restoratif dan rehabilitatif, dengan menempatkan pemulihan, keseimbangan sosial, dan reintegrasi pelaku sebagai prioritas. Dalam konteks narkotika, pengguna narkotika dapat diposisikan sebagai korban yang memerlukan rehabilitasi medis maupun psikososial. Meski demikian, penerapan keadilan restoratif di tingkat kepolisian belum berjalan optimal akibat adanya keterbatasan regulasi, ketidakseragaman penafsiran, lemahnya asesmen, koordinasi lintas lembaga yang belum efektif, serta terbatasnya sarana rehabilitasi. Oleh karenanya, diperlukan harmonisasi regulasi, penguatan kapasitas aparat, dan sinergi lintas sektor guna mendukung implementasi yang lebih efektif dan berkelanjutan. This research aims to examine the regulatory framework of restorative justice in Indonesia, to trace the theoretical foundations underlying its application in narcotics offenses, and to analyze its implementation in resolving narcotics criminal cases at the police level. A normative juridical approach is applied, combining statutory and conceptual analyses of primary and secondary legal sources along with comparative legal studies. The findings reveal that restorative justice has gained normative grounding through multiple legal instruments, including the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law, Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021, Prosecutor Regulation Number 15 of 2020, and Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2024, and has been progressively embedded in the newly enacted Criminal Code (KUHP) and Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). From a theoretical standpoint, the philosophy of punishment has undergone a fundamental shift away from a retributive orientation toward more integrative, restorative, and rehabilitative objectives, centering on recovery, social equilibrium, and the offender’s reintegration into society. In the specific context of narcotics enforcement, the application of Restorative Justice carries distinct characteristics, given that drug abusers are regarded as victims of dependency who require medical and social rehabilitation rather than punitive measures. Nonetheless, its implementation at the police level remains suboptimal. This is illustrated by the contrasting outcomes of two cases: the Rambu case, where restorative justice was successfully applied, and the Iman case, where procedural and institutional constraints prevented its use. These disparities are attributable to regulatory gaps, inadequate assessment mechanisms, diverging interpretations among law enforcement personnel, limited inter-agency coordination, and insufficient rehabilitation infrastructure. Consequently, regulatory harmonization, capacity-building among law enforcement, and stronger cross-sectoral cooperation are essential to ensure that Restorative Justice in Indonesia is implemented effectively and sustainably.
Ideal Judicial Pardon Decision Format in The Indonesia Criminal Justice System Based on Comparative Law Cornelius Samuel Sipahutar; Cahya Wulandari
The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): The Digest, June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/digest.v7i1.44869

Abstract

The recognition of judicial pardon in the 2023 Criminal Code reflects a shift in Indonesia’s sentencing paradigm from retribution toward substantive justice grounded in proportionality and humanity; however, this provision has not been accompanied by a clear formulation of decision formats in criminal procedural law, resulting in a normative gap that may generate disparity and legal uncertainty. This research examines how judicial pardon is implemented in the Dutch criminal justice system and how an ideal decision format may be constructed for adoption in Indonesia. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the analysis shows that under Article 9a of the Wetboek van Strafrecht, Dutch judges affirm the fulfillment of the elements of the offense and criminal responsibility while waiving punishment through explicit reasoning on proportionality, the social insignificance of the act, and the objectives of sentencing, demonstrating that judicial pardon does not eliminate guilt but serves as a rational limitation on penal power. Therefore, an ideal judicial pardon decision in Indonesia should retain the evidentiary structure of ordinary sentencing decisions, supplemented by specific considerations that systematically assess the necessity of punishment under Article 54 of the 2023 Criminal Code, and this study recommends that the Supreme Court formulate technical guidelines to ensure consistency, accountability, and harmonization between legal certainty and substantive justice in national criminal justice practice.
Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice System: Opportunity or Threat to the Rule of Law? Winarsih Winarsih; Cahya Wulandari; Rasdi Rasdi
Indonesian Court and Justice Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): February, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/x6krrd03

Abstract

This research critically examines the role of restorative justice within the criminal justice system, questioning whether it serves as an opportunity or a threat to the rule of law. Restorative justice, which emphasizes repairing harm through dialogue, accountability, and community involvement, has gained traction as an alternative to traditional punitive measures. This study evaluates its application in various legal systems, with a specific focus on how it is integrated into the criminal justice framework and its potential implications for legal norms and procedural fairness. Through comparative legal analysis and interviews with legal practitioners, scholars, and individuals involved in restorative justice practices, the research assesses the effectiveness of restorative justice in balancing offender rehabilitation with the protection of victims' rights. The findings reveal that while restorative justice has the potential to provide more holistic solutions and reduce recidivism, its implementation in some jurisdictions raises concerns about its consistency with the rule of law. Critics argue that it may undermine established legal principles, such as due process and proportional punishment, while supporters emphasize its restorative and community-centered values. This study contributes to the ongoing debate by offering nuanced insights into the broader implications of restorative justice on legal reform, advocating for clearer frameworks and guidelines to ensure that it enhances rather than threatens the integrity of the justice system.
Corporate Accountability in Law Enforcement: Challenges in Proving and Punishing Corporate Crimes Indah Sri Utari; Cahya Wulandari; Ridwan Arifin
Indonesian Court and Justice Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): August, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/4taz4v42

Abstract

Corporate crime poses a growing threat to economic integrity, public safety, and environmental sustainability, yet legal systems often struggle to hold corporations accountable. This study explores the challenges faced by Indonesian law enforcement agencies and courts in proving and prosecuting corporate crimes, ranging from environmental violations to corruption and financial fraud. Through analysis of selected case studies, court judgments, and interviews with prosecutors, investigators, and legal scholars, the research identifies key barriers such as evidentiary complexity, corporate shielding structures, weak regulatory frameworks, and institutional reluctance. The study highlights the limitations of current legal tools in attributing liability to corporate entities, especially in the absence of clear standards for corporate intent and culpability. It also discusses recent legal reforms and their potential to improve enforcement. The novelty of this study lies in its comprehensive examination of both procedural and structural barriers to corporate accountability. It offers policy recommendations for strengthening corporate criminal liability mechanisms and ensuring that justice is not evaded through legal and institutional loopholes.
Criminal Liability of Corporations and Beneficial Owners in Supreme Court Decision No. 8431–8433 K/PID.SUS/2025: An Analysis of Piercing the Corporate Veil Under the 2023 Criminal Code: Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dan Beneficial Owner dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 8431–8433 K/PID.SUS/2025: Analisis Piercing the Corporate Veil Pasca-KUHP 2023 Salsabila, Arini; Masyhar, Ali; Wulandari, Cahya
Al-Jinayah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): June 2026 (Forthcoming)
Publisher : Islamic Criminal Law Study Program, Faculty of Sharia and Law, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study analyzes the application of the doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil in Supreme Court Decisions Nos. 8431, 8432, and 8433 K/PID.SUS/2025, which convicted the Wilmar Group, Musim Mas Group, and Permata Hijau Group of corruption related to CPO exports and ordered restitution of Rp17.7 trillion. Using a normative legal research method with a legislative, case-based, and conceptual approach, this article discusses: (1) the construction of corporate criminal liability in the 2023 Criminal Code, specifically Article 47 regarding beneficial owners; and (2) the Supreme Court’s application of the “Piercing the Corporate Veil” doctrine. Key findings indicate that the Supreme Court pierces the corporate veil by viewing corporate groups as a single entity and extending liability to beneficial owners. However, the ruling remains dependent on the Anti-Corruption Law (lex specialis), thereby creating a normative gap with the 2023 Criminal Code.
The Urgency of Renewing the Theory of Punishment in the Formation of National Criminal Law Policy Wakhidatul Mubarokah; Ali Masyhar Mursyid; Cahya Wulandari
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (JURDIKBUD) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Maret : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (JURDIKBUD)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurdikbud.v5i1.6389

Abstract

The formulation of the National Criminal Code through Law Number 1 of 2023 highlights the importance of reforming sentencing theory to anticipate legal and social developments in Indonesia. This study adopts a normative qualitative approach, taking into account the evolution of sentencing paradigms. The findings reveal that the sentencing theory in the new Criminal Code has shifted from a retributive model to an integrative model. It combines restorative justice, absolute, and relative theories. Sentencing today is not solely aimed at punishment, but also at restoring social relations and protecting human rights. The introduction of more diverse types of punishment, the recognition of corporations as legal subjects, and the establishment of sentencing standards as judicial guidelines reflect this reform. In conclusion, a more humanistic and responsive national criminal law policy depends on the development of sentencing theory.
Legal Access for Marginalized Groups: A Study of Indonesia’s Legal Aid System and Its Impact on Minorities Cahya Wulandari; Benny Sumardiana
Indonesian Minority Justice Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): July, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/crt5bv68

Abstract

This paper evaluates the effectiveness of Indonesia’s legal aid system in providing access to justice for marginalized groups, particularly ethnic, religious, and sexual minorities. Legal aid is a critical component of ensuring equal access to justice, yet marginalized communities often face challenges in navigating the legal system due to poverty, illiteracy, and discrimination. The study examines Indonesia’s legal aid framework, focusing on the 2011 Law on Legal Aid and its implementation through government and non-governmental organizations. Through interviews with legal aid providers, marginalized individuals, and human rights advocates, the research assesses the accessibility, quality, and impact of legal aid services on minority communities. The findings suggest that while legal aid has provided essential support for many disadvantaged individuals, there remain significant gaps in coverage, particularly in remote areas and for non-citizens, such as refugees. The paper concludes by proposing recommendations to enhance the legal aid system, including expanding funding, improving outreach to underserved communities, and strengthening partnerships between government and civil society to ensure broader access to justice for all.
Co-Authors Abdurrahman - Abidah, Shofriya Qonitatin Abu, Roziya Adityo Putro Prakoso Aen, Kurotul Agung Aditya Agustin, Marsya Ahadi, Nugroho Aisyah Nur Rafidah Aiyanti, Silvia Nur Aldianto, Isrhaul Alfakar, Muhammad Wahyu Ali Mashyar Ali Masyar Ali Masyhar Ali Masyhar Mursid Ali Masyhar Mursyid Ali Masyhar Mursyid Ali Masyhar Musyid Amara Nanda Sari Anggyi Trisnawan Putra Ari Rahmayani, Chanidia Arya Pradana, Seta Aryani, Fajar Dian Asnel, Roza ASYAFFA RIDZQI AMANDHA Atsari Setiyowati, Tsaniya Atuzzuhro, Qoni' Aulya, Zahra Avilla Deva Aryanda Baidhowi Baidhowi, Baidhowi Bayu Arya Sakti Benny Sumardiana Chanidia Ari Rahmayani Cornelius Samuel Sipahutar Damanik, Yeriko Anugrah Pratama Daniel Nte, Ngboawaji Dede Indraswara Deo Renaldi Saputra Derita Prapti Rahayu Diaudin duana, Gumelar Dyah Maya Nihayah Dyajeng Ayu Musdalifah Emha, Zidney Ilma Fazaada Endang Susilaningsih Endang Susilaningsih Fadillah, Ahmad Arif Fahreshi Arya Pinthaka Faisal Faisal Fauzi, Ricky Dermawan Fikriyah, Amalina Fitrian Aliffah, Shelly Fitrianah, Fia Frasiska, Winda Galuh Nita Prameswari Ginta Amelia Cahya Ginta Amelia Cahya Gumelar Rizki Duana Hassan, Muhamad Sayuti Haykal, Salman Daffa Hidayatuzzakia, Hana Hudha Bagus Setyadi Ignatius Henri Pelupessy Indah Sri Utari Indraswara, Dede Indung Wijayanto Indung Wijayanto Indung Wijayanto Irma Cahyaningtyas Irma Cahyaningtyas, Irma Ismah, Ismah Isna Ariyani Yuni Vita Jauza Lasta Kautsar Justika Hairani K Kasmui Karnowo - Kasmui -, Kasmui Kautsar, Jauza Lasta Kautsar, Jauza Lasta Khikmah, Umi Faridatul Krisdayanti Laily Rosida, Elva Loso loso Malaika, Shera Mardana Rifta Oktaviana Mardiana - Masfuah, Lulu Zalianti Masrukhi Masrukhi Masyar, Ali Masyhar Mursyid, Ali Maulidya, Sarah Mifbakhuddin Moh. Khoiruddin Mohammad Rizal, Mohammad Muhammad Afis Saifunuha Muhammad Azil Maskur Muhammad Saifullah Muhammad Wahyu Alfakar Mukhoyyaroh, Vina Durrotul Muliadi Munandar, Tri Imam Mursidah, Siti Ngboawaji Daniel Nte Ningrum, Dwi Rahayu Kusuma Novice Afnan El Fikry Nugroho, Andre Setyo Nur Aiyanti, Silvia Nursuci Sekardi, Fadiya Nurzahro, Yufaida Paramitha Aulia Putri Nandira Pasaribu, Nauli Pinorsinta Pinky Nurazizah, Reza Pratiwi, Luh Prabha Primerta Putri Hapsari Pujiyono Pujiyono Pujiyono Pujiyono Putut Marwoto Qoiri, Mutmainah Nur Rabbani, Najmi Rafida, Aura Rahmatun Rafidah, Aura Rahmatun Rafikawati, Yulia Fajar Rahayu, Tasya Rahman, Aisha Nur Rahmawati Sucipto, Mega Rasd Rasdi Rasdi - Rasdi Rasdi, Rasdi Ratna Dewi Kusumaningtyas Ridwan Arifin Rindia Fanny Kusumaningtyas Rindia Fanny Kusumaningtyas Rindra, Sarah Riska, Eka Riyadi, Nabilla Aisyah Rizki Duana, Gumelar Rodiyah royce wijaya setya putra Royce Wijaya Setya Putra Sahrurosi, Putri Adinda Saifunuha, Muhammad Afis Saifunuha, Muhammad Afis Salsabila, Arini Sarno Setiawan Sekardi, Fadiya Nursuci Setiawan, Sarno Setiawan, Sarno Siburian, Panusunan Sonny Saptoajie Wicaksono Sonny Saptoajie Wicaksono SRI RAHAYU Sucipto, Mega Rahmawati Sudibya, Dafa Pranaja Sarwahita Sugianto Sugianto Suhadi Suhadi Sukadari Sukadari Sunusi Dauda Surtikanti, Monika Widyastuti Susilo Tri Widodo Uliana Sianipar, Jennifer Margareth Umi Faridatul Khikmah Unaenah, Een Undang Rosidin Wahdania Wahid Anshori Wahyu Sinta Dewi Pramudita Wahyuningtyas, Nanik Wakhidatul Mubarokah Wakhidatul Mubarokah Widya Hary Cahyati Wilson, Jack Andrew WINARSIH Winarsih Winarsih Winarsih Winarsih Winarsih Winarsih Yovitha Yuliejantiningsih, Yovitha Yuda Hanafi Lubis Yuliawati, Dea Yusril Ihza Mahendra Zalianti Masfuah, Lulu