Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Development of Progressive Islamic Law in Indonesia Regarding ‘Apostasy’ as Grounds for Divorce: Insights from Maqasid Sharia Huda, Miftakhul; Shofia, Niska; Solehudin, Ending; Rozikin, Opik; Ahyani, Hisam
Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol 6, No 1 (2022): Vol. 6, No. 1, October 2022
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jua.v6i1.36754

Abstract

The development of Islamic law in Indonesia, particularly concerning apostasy as a cause of divorce, is significant in the evolution of Islamic law. The complexity of Indonesia's social and legal system poses challenges in integrating Islamic values with societal diversity. This research aims to understand the development of Islamic law in Indonesia regarding apostasy issues through the analysis of maqasid sharia. Using a descriptive-analytical approach, data from various sources are examined to understand the development of Islamic law in Indonesia, focusing on the implications of maqasid sharia regarding apostasy as a reason for divorce. Findings indicate that progressive Islamic law development in Indonesia emphasizes a balance between religion and individual justice, protecting individual rights in divorce and seeking fair solutions through legal reforms considering the principles of maqasid sharia.
Ingkar Sunnah Dan Konsekuensinya Bagi Muslim Sucipto, Imam; Mukhlas, Oyo Sunaryo; Solehudin, Ending; Shauma Raffi’u, Aliyya
ISLAMICA Vol 7 No 1 (2023): ISLAMICA
Publisher : STAI Siliwangi Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59908/islamica.v7i1.78

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji sejarah perkembangan golongan yang ingkar sunnah sampai dengan ajaran-ajaran yang dikembangkan dan didakwahkan kepada masyarakat serta konsikuensi penganut paham ingkar sunnah terkhususnya bagi muslim itu sendiri. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, dengan penelaahan dokumen. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan, bahwa ingkar sunnah merupakan bentuk kegagalan dalam memahami sunnah dan pemahaman ini juga sudah ada pada masa kenabian. Sehingga beberapa ulama menerangkan bahwa konsikuensi terhadap penganut paham ini dikategorikan kafir.
Menelusuri Jejak Ijtihad: Metode Dewan Hisbah Persatuan Islam dalam Merespons Isu Zaman Titing Oting Supartini; Ending Solehudin
Dialog Legal: Jurnal Syariah, Jurisprudensi dan Tata Negara Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Mei
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Wal Aqidah Ash-Shofa Manonjaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study discusses the ijtihad method used by the Hisbah Council of Islamic Unity (PERSIS), one of the major Islamic organizations in Indonesia known for its commitment to the purification (tajdīd) of Islamic teachings. This research is motivated by the importance of understanding how religious institutions respond to socio-religious dynamics through a distinctive ijtihad mechanism. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the methodological approach of the Hisbah Council in formulating fatwas of contemporary Islamic law. This research uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical method. Data collection was carried out through a literature study of the official fatwa documents of the Hisbah Council, minutes of deliberations, and supporting literature related to the methodology of ijtihad and Persis Islamic thought. The results of the study show that the ijtihad method of the Hisbah Council is textualist-scriptural with an emphasis on the postulates of the Qur'an, sahih hadith, and qiyās. They reject the blind form of taklid as well as the use of istihsān and maṣlaḥah mursalah methods which are considered loose or do not have a strong nash basis. This study shows that the Hisbah Council maintains epistemological consistency in maintaining the purity of Islamic legal sources, but still shows a selective attitude in responding to contemporary issues. This strengthens the position of the Hisbah Council as an influential ijtihad authority in shaping the direction of religious thought of the Islamic Union in the modern era.
Different opinions of ulama in Fiqh Waqf: Epistemological, methodological, and contextual analysis Ridwansah, Asep Ahmad; Solehudin, Ending
Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study critically examines juristic disagreement (ikhtilaf) in waqf jurisprudence through an integrated epistemological, methodological, and contextual analysis, while exploring the pathways toward harmonizing classical doctrines with contemporary socio-economic demands. Using a qualitative, library-based research design, the study analyzes classical fiqh sources from the four Sunni schools, foundational works of uṣūl al-fiqh, contemporary academic discussions, and modern fatwas. The research scope encompasses the conceptual foundations of waqf, the validity of various asset types, istibdal, temporary waqf, and contemporary innovations, including cash waqf, waqf-linked sukuk, and digital waqf. The findings reveal that ikhtilaf is rooted in divergent epistemic commitments regarding textual authority, legal causation, and public interest, as well as methodological distinctions in legal reasoning and contextual influences across historical periods. Major challenges include the increasing complexity of financial instruments, fragmented regulatory frameworks, and limited capacity among waqf managers to operationalize maqasid-oriented governance. The study recommends strengthening collective ijtihad, developing maqasid-driven regulatory frameworks, and establishing measurable evaluative standards for modern waqf practices. Practical implications highlight the need to integrate classical fiqh reasoning with contemporary governance principles to ensure that waqf remains socially transformative and aligned with sustainable development objectives. This research formulates a normative–analytical model that synthesizes maqasid-oriented reasoning with juristic diversity, providing a conceptual platform for harmonizing waqf jurisprudence and enhancing the strategic relevance of waqf in the modern era.
The Role of Bahtsul Masail in the Development of Contemporary Islamic Jurisprudence in Indonesia: Peran Bahtsul Masail dalam Perkembangan Fikih Islam Kontemporer di Indonesia Adi Susandi; Ending Solehudin; Syahrul Anwar; Dede Sudrajat
BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M), Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/bustanul.v6i3.2315

Abstract

This article explores the evolving role of Bahtsul Masail, an Islamic legal forum under Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), in shaping contemporary Islamic jurisprudence in Indonesia. Bahtsul Masail has historically functioned as a platform for collective ijtihad, enabling scholars to address modern socio-religious issues using a structured legal reasoning method rooted in classical fiqh. The objective of this paper is to examine how Bahtsul Masail has transitioned from a textual and conservative framework toward a more dynamic, inclusive, and contextually responsive model of Islamic legal interpretation. Utilizing a qualitative-descriptive method, the research analyzes primary documents from NU congresses and scholarly literature. The findings reveal that Bahtsul Masail promotes a three-tiered methodological approach qauliy, ilhaqiy, and manhajiy allowing legal rulings to balance orthodoxy with socio-legal adaptability. This transformation not only strengthens the legitimacy of Islamic legal authority in Indonesia’s pluralistic society but also provides a model for legal innovation within traditional Islamic institutions.
The Ijtihad Methodology of the Persatuan Islam Hisbah Council In the Determination of Islamic Law Mugni Muhit; Jajang Herawan; Ending Solehudin
al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Vol. 6 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v6i4.823

Abstract

This research examines and studies the Ijtihad of the Persatuan Islam Hisbah Council in determining Islamic Law. Persatuan Islam is one of the renewal movements that was established in 1923 AD. Persatuan Islam conducted ijtihad through the Persis Ulama Council which later changed its name to the Persatuan Islam Hisbah Council. The Hisbah Council is an Persatuan Islam Legal Institution that functions as a council of consideration, sharia studies, and fatwas in the Persatuan Islam jam'iyyah. The legal studies of the Persatuan Islam Hisbah Council have produced many Islamic legal thoughts, including the law of prayer in two languages, the law of Friday prayer for travelers, raising hands when praying, the position of zakat and taxes, and waqf money, as well as inheritance from non-Muslims. The method of the Hisbah Council in making legal decisions is to base it on the Qur'an and Sahih Hadith, as the main reference and reference for determining Islamic law, and to make ijtihad on issues that are not found in the Qur'an and Hadith of the Prophet.
Konsep Akad Tabarru dalam Bentuk Menjaminkan Diri dan Memberikan Sesuatu Putra, Haris Maiza; Al-Hakim, Sofian; Solehudin, Ending; Naisabur, Nanang
Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): April
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Agama Islam, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/jhes.v5i1.12141

Abstract

Akad tabarru dalam bentuk memberikan sesuatu atau menjaminkan sesuatu adalah akad yang tujuannya untuk tolong menolong antar sesama. Akad tabarru ini bertujuan mencari keuntungan akhirat, bukan untuk keperluan komersil seperti akad tijarah. Akan tetapi dalam perkembangannya akad ini sering berkaitan dengan kegiatan transaksi komersil, karena akad tabarru ini bisa berfungsi sebagai perantara yang menjembatani dan memperlancar akad tijarah, sehingga terjadi banyak perbedaan persepsi tentang akad tabarru yang di komersilkan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memaparkan konsep akad tabarru dalam bentuk menjaminkan diri dan memberikan sesuatu. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kepustakaan, penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif, Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan dokumentasi, yaitu mencari data mengenai hal-hal atau variabel yang berhubungan dengan akad tabarru dari sumber buku, artikel, jurnal dan laporan penelitian, dan teknik analisis data menggunakan metode analisis data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa akad tabarru dalam hal menjaminkan diri dalam praktik kafalah dan wakalah telah tumbuh berkembang di Indonesia, perlu adanya kehati-hatian dalam melakukan akad kafalah mengenai rukun dan syaratnya, karena praktik kafalah kontemporer sudah berkembang pesat dengan berbagai bentuk dan jenisnya. Terkait akad tabarru dalam hal memberikan sesuatu dalam praktik hibah, hadiah, wakaf, zakat, infak dan shadaqah tidak ada perdebatan ulama mazhab akan ketidakbolehannya, yang dibutuhkan di Indonesia adalah kesadaran masyarakat untuk melakukannya. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah semua pihak diharapkan berhati-hati dalam melakukan akad tabarru, jangan sampai mengambil keuntungan dari akad tabarru yang tujuannya adalah untuk tolong menolong antar sesama.
The Expansion of Wasiat Wajibah: Protecting Legal Certainty and Fairness in Indonesian Inheritance Law Mohamad Yamin; Fauzan Ali Rasyid; Ending Solehudin; Ahmad Zaini
Fikri : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Fikri : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Ma'arif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25217/jf.v10i2.7265

Abstract

Article 209 of the Compilation of Islamic Law normatively limits the recipients of wasiat wajibah ‘mandatory bequests’ only to adopted children and adoptive parents with a maximum limit of one-third of the testator's property. However, the development of the Supreme Court's jurisprudence shows that there is an expansion of the recipients of compulsory probate to other parties such as stepchildren, children from unregistered marriages, and non-Muslim heirs, which creates a gap between written norms and judicial practice. This study aims to analyze the legal considerations of the Supreme Court in expanding the subject of compulsory probate recipients and its contribution to the renewal of probate law in the development of national law. The research uses an empirical juridical approach with data collection techniques through documentation studies of Supreme Court decisions, laws and regulations, and legal literature, which are analyzed descriptively- analytically using maqāṣid al-sharī'ah theory, legal reform theory, and legal discovery theory; validation is done through triangulation of primary and secondary legal sources. The results show that the Supreme Court's consideration in expanding the mandatory bequests is based on the recipient's real contribution to the testator, social proximity, and protection of vulnerable parties for the sake of substantive justice. Theoretically, this research contributes to the development of the concept of maqāṣid al-sharī'ah-based mandatory bequests and strengthens the legitimacy of jurisprudence as an instrument of Islamic law reform in Indonesia's national legal system, especially in bridging the tension between normative norms and social reality.
Divergent Jurisprudential Paradigms of Productive Zakat: A Madhhab-Based Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning in LAZISNU and LAZISMU Solehudin, Ending; Fautanu, Idzam; Ahyani, Hisam; Masuwd, Mowafg
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 8 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.64628

Abstract

This study examines productive zakat not merely as a managerial instrument for economic empowerment, but as a manifestation of contemporary Islamic legal ijtihād (independent legal reasoning) shaped by divergent jurisprudential paradigms. Situated within the framework of comparative madhhab studies, this research analyzes how differences in legal reasoning between LAZISNU—rooted in the Shāfiʿī legal tradition—and LAZISMU—characterized by a reformist approach grounded in tajdīd (renewal) and tarjīḥ (legal preference)—influence the formulation and implementation of productive zakat practices in Indonesia. Employing a qualitative juridical-empirical method, the study draws on in-depth interviews with zakat administrators and institutional documents from LAZISNU and LAZISMU operating in Java and Bali. The findings reveal that the transformation of zakat from consumptive distribution to productive utilization is legitimized through distinct modes of istidlāl (legal reasoning or inferential deduction), wherein LAZISNU emphasizes adherence to authoritative Shāfiʿī doctrines, particularly concerning the principle of tamlīk (transfer of ownership to beneficiaries), while LAZISMU adopts a more flexible form of ijtihād that prioritizes maqāṣid al-sharīʿah (the higher objectives of Islamic law) and socio-economic outcomes. This divergence reflects an ongoing dialectic within contemporary Islamic legal thought regarding the boundaries of zakat utilization. By integrating empirical practices with cross-madhhab legal analysis, this study contributes to the development of comparative fiqh al-zakāt (Islamic jurisprudence of zakat) and demonstrates how modern philanthropic institutions negotiate classical legal doctrines within heterogeneous socio-legal contexts such as Java and Bali.
The Relationship between Tax Law and Other Laws: A Review of Problems in Tax Collection Ending Solehudin; Atisa; Della Agustina; Jihan Syahirah Lubis; Rahma Seliati Br Sitorus
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): ISNU Cendikia September
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v2i2.848

Abstract

Tax law, a collection of regulations governing the relationship between the government as tax collector and the people as taxpayers, defines taxes as mandatory contributions to the state owed by individuals or entities that are coercive under the law, without receiving any direct compensation and are used for state purposes for the greatest prosperity of the people. Tax compliance is a major issue that requires greater attention in the era of private system evaluation. Several key factors affecting tax collection are taxpayer trust in tax institutions, complex regulations, low public awareness of taxes, and tax administration. It is hoped that improvements in organizations, human resources (HR), information technology, business processes, and tax laws and regulations will help overcome tax administration problems and increase taxpayer compliance.
Co-Authors AA Sudharmawan, AA Abd Khafidz, Hasanah Adi Susandi Adnan, Nurul Ilyana Muhd Agus Munjirin Mukhotib Lathif Ahmad Damiri Ahmad Zaini Ahmad, Md Yazid Al-Hakim, Sofian Athoillah, Mohammad Anton Atisa Aziz, Riva Abdillah Azmi, Nofan Nurkhafid Berizi, Ahmad Bhatti , Muhammad Safdar Camila, Vanisa Dede Sudrajat Della Agustina Dwi Widiastuti, Dwi Eko Budiono Encep Taufik Rahman Fahmi, Ahmad Zulfi Fariz, Luthfi Ahmad Fauzan Ali Rasyid Gómez, José Manuel Naranjo Hasan Bisri Hasanah Abd Khafidz Hasanudin Hasanudin Hidayat, Moh. Syarif Hisam Ahyani Huda , Miftakhul Ibnu Rusydi Idzam Fautanu Irni Sri Cahyanti Iwan Setiawan Jajang Herawan Jamaludin, Jujun Jihan Syahirah Lubis Jubaedah, Dedah Lutfi Fahrul Rizal, Lutfi Fahrul Madani, Farid Maman Suryaman Maruf Maruf, Maruf Masuwd, Mowafg Maulani Salsabila Miftakhul Huda Moh. Asep Zakariya Ansori Mohamad Yamin Mudzakkir, Muhammad Mugni Muhit Muhammad Furqon Almurni Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti Muharir, Muharir Mukhlas, Oyo Sunaryo Mulyana, Indra Mustofa Mustofa Mustopa Mutakin, Ali Mutmainah, Naeli Naeli Mutmainah Naisabur, Nanang Nasrudin Nasrudin Niska Shofia, Niska Noradin, Muhammad Farhan Bin Mat Nurhasana, Nurhasana Nurhikmah, Aulia Nurul Ilyana Muhd Adnan Nurwijayanti Parhan, Parhan Putra, Haris Maiza Rahma Seliati Br Sitorus Rani Mariana Ridwan, Ahmad Hasan Ridwansah, Asep Ahmad Riva Abdillah Aziz Rosihon Anwar, Rosihon Royani Rozikin, Opik Saepudin Saepullah, Usep Sartono Sartono, Sartono Saujan, Iqbal Shakibiciu, Saeideh Shauma Raffi’u, Aliyya Sofian Al Hakim, Sofian Sucipto, Imam Sumiati Sumiati Syahrul Anwar Taufik Rahman, Encep Titing Oting Supartini Wahyudi Wahyudi Yadi Janwari