p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.683
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Al-'Adalah Dimas: Jurnal Pemikiran Agama untuk Pemberdayaan IJTIHAD Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan El-Mashlahah Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains AL-HUKAMA´ SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Al-Khidmat : Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal el-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Asy-Syariah Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Al-Muamalat: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Syari'ah Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam Iqtishaduna : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture and Social Studies Action Research Literate (ARL) USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat : Pemberdayaan, Inovasi dan Perubahan Hakam : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan IQTISHOD: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah : AICONOMIA Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Strata Law Review Strata Social and Humanities Studies Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Falah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Al-Hukama: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law AGHNINA: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Journal of Pesantren and Diniyah Studies Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Lex Scientia Law Review Interdisciplinary Explorations in Research Journal (IERJ) Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Mabahits Al-Uqud
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Science Laboratory Activities: A Profile of the Implementation and Constraints of Junior High School Natural Science Teachers Adam Malik; Hasniah Aliah; Seni Susanti; Mujib Ubaidillah; Ramdani Wahyu Sururie
Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020): June 2020
Publisher : Tadris Biologi Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan IAIN SYEKH NURJATI CIREBON

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/sc.educatia.v9i1.6517

Abstract

This study aims to describe the implementation and various obstacles of laboratory activities in junior high schools. The study employed the descriptive quantitative method. The subjects of the study were science teachers in 41 junior high schools representing 4 areas of the Natural Sciences Teachers' Consultative Assembly (MGMP IPA) in Jawa Barat Province. The instrument employed was a questionnaire. The technical analysis of the data was conducted by calculating the average percentage of each answer choice of each statement. This research reveals that 1) the students’ motivation for conducting laboratory activities is high; 2) the implementation of laboratory activities is conducted separately by employing theoretical classroom learning; 3) the source of guidance for laboratory activities is a model of cookbook laboratory; and 4) some obstacles in laboratory activities include insufficient laboratory spaces, less standardized and insufficient number of most equipment, the availability of manuals for laboratory activities, insufficient instructions to use laboratory equipment, and teachers’ difficulties in designing, implementing, and evaluating laboratory activities. It is concluded that in general teachers and students are very enthusiastic about conducting laboratory activities in science learning, but they still have several constraints, especially in the available infrastructures.
UJI SUBSTANTIF PASAL 212 KHI DALAM SENGKETA PENARIKAN HIBAH: STUDI KOMPARATIF DUA PUTUSAN PERADILAN AGAMA Mohamad Sar'an; Sahril Sidik; Ramdani Wahyu Sururie
JURNAL HAKAM Vol 10, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/jhi.v10i2.15064

Abstract

This study examines the dialectics of judicial reasoning (rechtsvinding) in disputes over the revocation of gifts (ruju’ fi al-hibah) through the lens of the abuse of rights doctrine (ta’assuf fi isti’mal al-haq). Historically, Article 212 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) is often misunderstood as a norm granting absolute authority to parents to revoke a gift, rendering it devoid of material boundaries and potentially triggering injustice. Through normative legal research employing conceptual and comparative approaches to the Surabaya Religious Court Decision No. 5001/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Sby and Supreme Court Decision No. 467/K/AG/2017, this article reveals that the judiciary has shifted towards substantive justice. Judicial disparity occurs not due to inconsistent textual adherence, but as a manifestation of the judge's acuity in detecting bad faith. The Surabaya Religious Court canceled a gift to punish manipulation and defect of will (wilsgebreke) by the child, while the Supreme Court canceled a gift to prevent the exploitation of marital property by the parent without spousal consent. As a core finding, this article deconstructs the right of revocation into a "conditional right" and provides a practical contribution in the form of three absolute material testing parameters for judges: motivation test (two-way bad faith detection), ownership and object transformation test (mawani’ al-ruju’), and harm proportionality test. The cumulative application of these parameters is expected to serve as a judicial guideline to prevent the abuse of rights and protect the justice of the family institution.
Procedures for Resolving Banking Crimes within Islamic Financial Institutions: A Case Study of Financing Document Forgery in Murabahah Contracts Roni Nasrulloh; Ramdani Wahyu Sururie; Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas
Aghnina : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syari'ah Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): published
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Ekonomi Syari'ah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64431/ag.v3i1.459

Abstract

This study examines the procedures for resolving banking crimes within Islamic financial institutions, focusing on cases of document forgery in murabahah financing contracts. Murabahah dominates Islamic banking financing in Indonesia, making it particularly vulnerable to fraud arising from weaknesses in internal control, supervision, and document verification. This research aims to analyze the forms of document forgery in murabahah financing and to evaluate the mechanisms for resolving such crimes through internal institutional processes, non-litigation pathways, and litigation channels. Employing a qualitative approach with a case study design, the study utilizes primary data obtained through in-depth interviews with Islamic banking practitioners and law enforcement officials, alongside secondary data from legislation, court decisions, regulatory documents, and academic literature. The findings indicate that document forgery in murabahah financing commonly involves falsification of debtor identities, collateral documents, and transaction records. Resolution procedures generally prioritize internal settlement through audits, disciplinary sanctions, and recovery measures, followed by non-litigation mechanisms such as mediation and arbitration based on Islamic principles. Litigation is pursued when criminal elements are evident, involving both Religious Courts for civil disputes and General Courts for criminal prosecution. From both Islamic law and positive law perspectives, document forgery constitutes a serious violation of legal and ethical norms. The study highlights the importance of strengthening governance, compliance systems, and sharia supervision to prevent and effectively address banking crimes in Islamic financial institutions.
Preventing Harm or Securing Certainty? Disparities in Religious Court Rulings on Polygamy Permits Resulting from Pregnancy Out of Wedlock Sifa Mulya Nurani; Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas; Siah Khosyi'ah; Ramdani Wahyu Sururie; Rohmad Nurhuda
Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Alumni dan Santri Mahyajatul Qurro'

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53754/iscs.v6i1.862

Abstract

The pregnancy of a prospective second wife outside of marriage is not explicitly regulated by law as a valid reason for permitting polygamy, thus creating a legal vacuum and disparities in rulings by religious courts. This study aimed to investigate the causes of these disparities by comparing the Karangasem Religious Court (PA) Decision No. 1/Pdt. G/2018/PA.Kras, which granted the petition, and the Kaimana Religious Court (PA) Decision No. 22/Pdt. G/2019/PA.Kmn, which rejected it. This qualitative study employed a juridical-normative approach. Data collection was conducted through a document analysis of primary legal materials—namely, the two rulings—which were then analyzed using content analysis through the lens of Satjipto Rahardjo’s Progressive Law. The results of the study revealed a sharp divergence in the judges’ legal reasoning. The Karangasem Religious Court judge demonstrated a non-positivist and contextual approach that prioritizes substantive justice by boldly making legal innovations to protect children. The judge applied the fiqh principle of dar’ul mafasid muqaddamun ‘ala jalbil mashalih (preventing harm takes precedence over seeking benefit). In contrast, the judge at the Kaimana Religious Court adopted a rigid, positivistic, and textual approach, strictly adhering to the formal requirements of Law No. 1 of 1974, without considering the sociological urgency of the pregnancy. This study concludes that a progressive legal perspective is highly relevant to this specific case, in which the law serves to protect human beings and prevent greater harm to the legal status of mothers and children.
Application Of Legal Maxims In Contract Law: Pacta Sunt Servanda And Islamic Rules On Promises Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti; Ija Suntana; Ramdani Wahyu Sururie; Lexy Fatharany Kurniawan; Nik Salida Suhaila Nik Saleh
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): May, 2025: Law, Technology, and Globalization: Challenges and Innovations in th
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i1.20858

Abstract

In the practice of contract law, the fulfillment of promises and compliance with agreements are fundamental aspects to ensure justice and legal certainty. The principle of pacta sunt servanda which emphasizes the obligation to honor agreements has relevance to Islamic rules which also require the fulfillment of promises. This research uses normative legal research methods with a comparative juridical approach. Primary data sources are obtained from laws, government regulations, court decisions, and other relevant legal documents. While secondary data is obtained from books, journals, scientific articles, and other literature that discusses the principle of pacta sunt servanda, Islamic rules on promises, and contract law. Data collection techniques use literature study and document analysis, while data analysis techniques use qualitative analysis using the inductive method, and comparative analysis to compare the principle of pacta sunt servanda with Islamic rules of promise. The findings show that pacta sunt servanda and Islamic rules of promise have similarities in emphasizing the importance of commitment to the contract. However, there are differences in the application of these two legal systems, especially regarding exceptions and certain conditions such as force majeure and the principle of benefit in Islam. The principle of pacta sunt servanda and the Islamic rule of promise can complement each other in the practice of contract law, especially in the context of countries that apply legal pluralism. The application of these two principles encourages trust and stability in business transactions. This research recommends strengthening the legal framework that accommodates elements of contract compliance while taking into account aspects of substantive justice and relevant special conditions.
Islamic Inheritance Law as Living Law in South Sulawesi: Developing a Contextual-Moderate Receptie Approach Muhammad Fajri; Idzam Fautanu; Ramdani Wahyu Sururie; Enceng Arif Faizal; Taufik, Muh. Bambang
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/9eqbqm02

Abstract

This study examines Islamic inheritance practices among Muslim communities in South Sulawesi, where Qur’anic inheritance norms interact with local traditions and family-based mechanisms of property transfer within a living law framework. Although Islamic inheritance law is normatively ijbārī and grounded in definitive Qur’anic texts, empirical practices frequently involve lifetime gifts (hibah), bequests (wasiat), family deliberation, caregiving-based considerations, and consensual redistribution. Employing a normative-empirical juridical method with a socio-legal approach, this study draws on document analysis and in-depth interviews with Religious Court judges, religious officials, customary leaders, and community figures across several regions of South Sulawesi. The findings reveal that Islamic inheritance law remains widely acknowledged as a binding religious obligation rooted in faith commitment, yet its application is commonly mediated through classical Islamic legal mechanisms rather than routine formal adjudication. These practices do not function as attempts to evade inheritance law, but as context-sensitive applications aimed at preserving justice, family harmony, and social legitimacy within Islamic law as living law. However, the prevalence of unregulated legal eclecticism exposes a risk of normative dilution when definitive Qur’anic inheritance norms are treated as negotiable preferences. In response, this study advances a contextual-moderate receptie approach, grounded in Islamic legal principles and maqāṣid-based systems thinking, to balance normative certainty with contextual justice. By positioning Islamic inheritance law as the normative core of an integrated family property transfer system encompassing waris, hibah, and wasiat, this study contributes to socio-legal scholarship on Islamic law and legal pluralism within Indonesia’s plural legal landscape.
Manifestasi Nilai-Nilai Islam Madani di Kalangan Generasi Muslim Gen Z melalui Prinsip Moderasi (Wasathiyyah), Filantropi Digital, dan Kepedulian Ekologis Tantri Irawan; Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas; Ramdani Wahyu Sururie; Chaerul Shaleh; Ine Fauziah; Ayi Yunus Rusyana
Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science Vol 5 No 01 (2026): Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/jmws.v5i01.3091

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji manifestasi nilai-nilai Islam Madani di kalangan generasi Muslim Gen Z melalui prinsip moderasi (wasathiyyah), filantropi digital, dan kepedulian ekologis. Dalam era digital yang sarat dengan perubahan nilai sosial, generasi ini menafsirkan kembali etika Islam tidak hanya sebagai spiritualitas pribadi, tetapi juga sebagai tanggung jawab sosial yang diwujudkan melalui gaya hidup berkeadilan, konsumsi moderat, serta keterlibatan aktif dalam kegiatan sosial dan lingkungan seperti charity run, donasi digital, dan eco-sadaqah. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan sosiologis dan etika ekonomi Islam, penelitian ini menelaah bagaimana inovasi teknologi dan media sosial telah mentransformasi bentuk-bentuk sedekah tradisional menjadi praktik filantropi digital yang inklusif, transparan, dan berkelanjutan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa semangat Islam Madani yang menekankan keseimbangan, keadilan, dan kasih saying tetap hidup di kalangan Muslim muda yang kini membentuk pola keberagamaan baru yang moderat, partisipatif, dan berorientasi pada maslahah ‘ammah. Fenomena ini menegaskan bahwa Islam Madani di era Gen Z menjadi model praksis keberislaman modern yang mengintegrasikan iman, teknologi, dan tanggung jawab ekologis dalam mewujudkan masyarakat yang adil, berkeadaban, dan berkelanjutan.
Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Antara Litigasi dan Non-Litigasi Ulafa Fatma; Amalia Muazzah Adawiah; Ramdani Wahyu Sururie
Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Agama Islam, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/jhes.v8i1.26011

Abstract

Cara yang dilakukan untuk menyelesaikan suatu sangketa ekonomi syariah bisa mengambil jalur litigasi dan non litigasi. Penyelesaian tersebut bisa dipilih oleh pihak yang berpekara, antara litigasi dan non litigasi ada keuntungan dan kelebihan masing – masing dari prosedural pengajuan perkara, penyelesaian perkara hingga hasil akhir keputusan. Penyelesaian secara litigasi yang berurusan dengan Peradilan Agama, penyelesain ini dibantu oleh hakim untuk mendengarkan semua pihak yang berperkara dan mengumpulkan bukti-bukti untuk menjadi bahan analisis putusan. Serta penyelesaian non litigasi melalui diluar jalur Peradilan Agama, seperti lembaga arbitrase dan lembaga lainnya, selain itu penyelesaian nonlitigasi bisa diselesaikan melalui musyawarah dengan menemukan solusi yang tepat untuk menyelesaikan perkara. Riset ini menggunakan penelitian analisis normatif, dimana akan berfokus pada analisis penyelesaian sangketa litigasi yang didaftarkan tertara nomor 4/Pdt.G.S/2024/PA.Badg dan penyelesaian non litigasi pada permasalahan mediasi diluar pengadilan, dimana perkara yang uraikan dicari atas permasalahan yang ada di lapangan Analisis ini dilakukan untuk membandingan antara kedua penyelesaian tersebut untuk dicari perbedaan. Hasil penilitian mengacu pada Penyelesian sangketa secara litigasi dan non litigasi ini bisa digunakan sesuai kebutuhan pokok permasalahan, diukur dari kerumitan perkara dan kapasitas dana yang dipermasalahkan. Pilihan antara kedua metode ini sangat tergantung pada kebutuhan dan preferensi pihak yang terlibat serta kompleksitas sengketa yang dihadapi.
Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia: Juridical Challenges and Human Rights Perspectives Ais Surasa; Ramdani Wahyu Sururie; Najib A. Gisymar; Mohammad Syaiful Aris; Diana Farid; Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti
Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan
Publisher : Hukum Keluarga Islam IAIN LANGSA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/qadha.v12i1.11071

Abstract

Interfaith marriage refers to a union between two individuals who adhere to different religions and remains a complex issue within the Indonesian legal system. Legally, Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage does not explicitly regulate interfaith unions. However, Article 2(1) of the law states that a marriage is valid if conducted by the religious laws and beliefs of the parties involved. This commonly means that interfaith marriages lack legal recognition in Indonesia. This interpretation is further reinforced by the issuance of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 2 of 2023. This study adopts a normative juridical method with a descriptive qualitative approach. Primary data were obtained from the Marriage Law, the Compilation of Islamic Law, fatwas issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI), Muhammadiyah, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), and SEMA No. 2 of 2023. Secondary data were gathered from legal literature, court decisions, and scholarly articles. The findings indicate that, under Article 2(1) of the Marriage Law, interfaith marriages are deemed invalid under Indonesian national law. However, from a human rights perspective—as stipulated in Article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and Article 28B(1) of the 1945 Constitution—every individual has the right to marry regardless of religious affiliation. This study also outlines several legal alternatives available to interfaith couples seeking to formalize their marriage, including filing a court petition, temporarily adhering to one partner’s religious law, or marrying abroad. The legal implications of interfaith marriage include issues related to its validity, administrative registration, children's legal status, and both spouses' civil rights.
Dinamika Syarat Pemisahan Tempat Tinggal 6 Bulan dalam Perceraian: Analisis SEMA Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 dan Implementasi Maqashid Syariah Abdul Kodir Alhamdani; Mumu Fahmudin; Uus Kusmayadi; Ramdani Wahyu Sururie
Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 3, No 2 (2026): Ahlana: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/jhki.v3i2.28935

Abstract

The high divorce rate under the pretext of continuous disputes and quarrels’ has led to the desacralization of marriage and triggered disparities in Religious Court decisions. In response, the Supreme Court issued Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 3 of 2023, mandating a minimum 6-month separation period as an objective standard for a broken marriage, with a specific exception for cases indicating Domestic Violence (KDRT). This normative legal research aims to analyze the ratio legis and the implementation of this regulation using statutory and conceptual approaches based on Maqashid Syariah. The findings indicate that the 6-month separation requirement serves as an instrument of sadd adz-dzari'ah to minimize impulsive divorces, ensure legal certainty, and protect family integrity (hifz al-nasl). Conversely, the exception for KDRT victims represents the harmony and flexibility of Islamic law, which prioritizes the safety of human life (hifz al-nafs) over the formal administrative procedures of marriage. In conclusion, SEMA 3/2023 has normatively succeeded in harmonizing legal certainty with gender justice. However, on an empirical implementation level, this regulation demands the courage of Religious Court Judges to conduct progressive legal discovery (rechtvinding) when evaluating non-formal KDRT evidence to prevent the secondary victimization of women. Tingginya angka perceraian dengan dalih perselisihan dan pertengkaran terus-menerus telah menciptakan fenomena desakralisasi perkawinan dan memicu disparitas putusan di Peradilan Agama. Merespons hal tersebut, Mahkamah Agung menerbitkan SEMA Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 yang mensyaratkan perpisahan tempat tinggal minimal 6 (enam) bulan sebagai standar objektif broken marriage, dengan pengecualian khusus bagi perkara yang terindikasi Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT). Penelitian hukum normatif ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis rasio legis dan implementasi regulasi tersebut menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual berbasis Maqashid Syariah. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa syarat masa perpisahan 6 bulan merupakan instrumen sadd adz-dzari'ah guna meminimalisir perceraian impulsif, menjamin kepastian hukum, dan memproteksi keutuhan keluarga (hifz al-nasl). Di sisi lain, pengecualian bagi korban KDRT merepresentasikan harmoni dan fleksibilitas hukum Islam yang memprioritaskan keselamatan jiwa manusia (hifz al-nafs) di atas formalitas prosedur administrasi perkawinan. Kesimpulannya, SEMA 3/2023 secara normatif telah berhasil mendialogkan kepastian hukum dengan keadilan gender. Namun, pada tataran implementasi empiris, regulasi ini menuntut keberanian Hakim Pengadilan Agama dalam melakukan penemuan hukum (rechtvinding) secara progresif saat menilai alat bukti non-formal KDRT guna mencegah viktimisasi sekunder terhadap perempuan.
Co-Authors A Arnengsih Abdul Basith, Muhammad Abdul Kodir Alhamdani Abdul Kodir Alhamdani Abdullah, Fadli Daud Adam Malik Ade Jamarudin Adi Rosadi Adila, Hafidah Ulya Ahmad Ridwan Ais Surasa Alan Sparingga Amalia Muazzah Adawiah Arnengsih, A Athoillah, Mohammad Ayi Yunus Rusyana Badarulzaman, Muhammad Hafiz Bayu yudha Wijaya Burhanuddin Burhanuddin Burhanuddin Cahyani, Putri Tri Chaerul Shaleh Diana Farid Diding Jalaludin Dio Ashar Wicaksana Enceng Arif Faizal Farid, Apit Fauzi Ahmad Muda Gugun Gumilar Hafid, Nu'man Sofari Hanan, Rafie Muhammad Yasril Harry Yuniardi Hasanudin, Maulana Hasniah Aliah Husni Paozan Ibnu Elmi AS Pelu Idzam Fautanu Idzam Fautanu Ikhsan, Muhammad Miftahul Imam Sucipto Ine Fauziah iwan setiawan Jefry Tarantang Jihad, Fitri Khaerunnisa, Qalby Lexy Fatharany Kurniawan lia kamelia Lidikrirrofiqi, Muhammad Rifqi Lis Diana Ningsih Lubis, Alvan Rahfiansyah Maghrabi, Ahmad Maulana Mahmudah Martina, Annisa Mohamad Sar'an Mohammad Syaiful Aris Muchlis Muhamad Ramdhan Muhammad Fajri Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti Mujib Ubaidillah Mujiburohman, Mujiburohman Mukhlas , Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas, Oyo Sunaryo Mumu Fahmudin Muslim, Dendi Ramdani Najib A. Gisymar Nik Salida Suhaila Nik Saleh Nofirman Furry Nova Nurul Iman Nuroniyah Nursyamsudin, Nursyamsudin Nurwijayanti Oyo Sunaryo Muchlas Oyo Sunaryo Muchlas Padlan Padilah Prahasti Suyaman Prasetia, Riky Rahmani, Salma Ridwan, Ahmad Hasan Rizal Agung Mufti Rizel Juneldi Rizkia, Nabila Subur Rohmad Nurhuda Rohmanur Aziz, Rohmanur Roni Nasrulloh Ropei, Ahmad Rusmana, Dian Saeful Fikri Saepullah, Usep Sahril Sidik Sanjaya, Ramadhan Adi Shania Anwar Siah Khosyi'ah Sifa Mulya Nurani Sobana, Dadang Husen Solihan Makruf Sonjaya, Feny Ramadhani Sugiyanti, Ektalina Sunaryo, Oyo Suntana, Ija Susanti, Seni Syahidin, Rosyad Syamsul Azizul Marinsah Tantri Irawan Taufik, Muh. Bambang Ulafa Fatma Ulhaq, Muhammad Iqbal Zia Usep Saepulah Uus Kusmayadi Wahyu Akbar Yoghi Arief Susanto Yuniardi, Harry Yusrina, Kartika Zahra Suryana Zulfaidah, Rena Zulvia, Ransya Ayu