Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
13.392
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Abdimas JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum ECSOFiM (Economic and Social of Fisheries and Marine Journal) Arena Hukum Qistie: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Diponegoro Law Review Law and Justice Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Halu Oleo Law Review Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Diponegoro Private Law Review Anuva: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Perpustakaan, dan Informasi JURNAL PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI JURNAL MERCATORIA Kosmik Hukum Jurnal de jure Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat (JAM) Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Jurnal Abdi Insani KRTHA BHAYANGKARA The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Jurnal Suara Hukum Indonesia Private Law Review Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Jurnal Bina Desa East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR) Perspektif Hukum Education Journal: General and Specific Research Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif Prosiding Temu Ilmiah Nasional Guru Annual Review of Legal Studies Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Keguruan Journal of Law and Legal Reform The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal) Lex Scientia Law Review Journal of Private and Commercial Law Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services "Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development " Indonesian Journal of Pancasila and Global Constitutionalism JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review Indonesia Media Law Review Law Research Review Quarterly Unnes Law Journal : Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Mahalini: Journal of Business Law Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Human Rights Law and Policy
Dewi Sulistianingsih
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 130 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 130 Documents
Search

 9   10   11   12   13 
DILEMA PERLINDUNGAN KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL PADA INDUSTRI KONVEKSI: ANTARA HAK CIPTA DAN DESAIN INDUSTRI Aghnia Widya Avina; Dewi Sulistianingsih; Sang Ayu Putu Rahayu
Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 14 No. 8 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2026.v14.i08.p02

Abstract

konveksi. Namun, tidak seluruh produk konveksi otomatis dilindungi oleh hak cipta. Pola potongan atau bentuk produk yang dibuat secara massal masuk dalam ranah desain industri berdasarkan UU No 31 Tahun 2000, sementara hak cipta sebatas melindungi motifnya sebagai seni terapan. Ketidakselarasan pemahaman ini yang kerap menjebak pelaku usaha khususnya bidang konveksi menjadi korban penjiplakan. Adanya ketidakselarasan ini, memuat dua rumusan masalah yang mendasar bagaimana batasan perlindungan hukum antara hak cipta dan desain industri yang ada pada usaha konveksi khususnya di Konveksi Project One Semarang, dan Apa saja kendala yang dihadapi dalam penegakan hak cipta terhadap desain konveksi yang digunakan tanpa izin. Fokus penelitian ini tertuju pada identifikasi kendala penegakan hukum kekayaan intelektual dan opsi pemulihan hak bagi pengusaha konveksi, dengan adanya kendala di Konveksi Project One Semarang. Untuk menelaah, metode yuridis empiris digunakan melalui wawancara dengan pengusaha konveksi kemudian dianalisis dengan data berupa beberapa undang-undang hukum kekayaan intelektual. Temuan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa kendala utama dalam penegakan hak cipta adalah kurangnya kesadaran hukum di kalangan pelaku industri, pengawasan yang lemah, dan kesulitan dalam membuktikan pelanggaran. Upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh pemilik hak cipta termasuk penyelesaian sengketa melalui litigasi dan non-litigasi. Kesimpulannya, perlindungan hak cipta harus diperkuat melalui pendidikan hukum, pengawasan yang ditingkatkan, dan penegakan hukum yang ketat terhadap pelanggaran hak cipta. Copyright is a form of legal protection for creators of their works, including in the garment industry. However, not all apparel products are automatically protected by copyright. The patterns or shapes of mass-produced products fall under the realm of industrial design pursuant to Law No. 31 of 2000, while copyright is limited to protecting the motifs as applied art. This discrepancy in understanding often leads business operators—particularly in the apparel sector—to become victims of plagiarism. Given this discrepancy, this study addresses two fundamental research questions: what are the boundaries of legal protection between copyright and industrial design in the garment industry, specifically at Konveksi Project One in Semarang, and what are the challenges faced in enforcing copyright against the unauthorized use of garment designs. This study focuses on identifying obstacles to the enforcement of intellectual property law and options for rights restoration for garment business owners, given the challenges faced by Project One Garment in Semarang. To examine these issues, an empirical legal method was employed through interviews with garment business owners, followed by analysis of data consisting of various intellectual property laws. The findings indicate that the main obstacles to copyright enforcement are a lack of legal awareness among industry players, weak oversight, and difficulties in proving violations. Legal efforts that copyright owners can undertake include dispute resolution through litigation and non-litigation. In conclusion, copyright protection must be strengthened through legal education, enhanced supervision, and strict law enforcement against copyright violations
Reconstruction of the Legal Framework for Consumer Protection in ESG-Based Digital Investment and Blockchain Technology: A Legal Study Muchammad Shidqon Prabowo; Dewi Sulistianingsih; Nasarudin Abdul Rahman; Takwim Azami
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Legal Reform, Human Rights Protection, and Judicial Innovation in Contemporary
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v10i1.29090

Abstract

This study analyzes the regulatory framework for consumer protection in digital investment based on ESG principles and blockchain technology in Indonesia. The method used is juridical-normative with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The results of the study indicate a significant regulatory gap, including the non-recognition of the legality of smart contracts, the absence of a digital ESG claim verification mechanism, the absence of a blockchain-based dispute resolution model, and the fragmentation of supervision coordination between national authorities. As a contribution, this study offers a new legal framework model that integrates the recognition of smart contracts, the establishment of a digital ESG verification institution, the development of blockchain-based ADR, and regulatory harmonization. This innovation is expected to strengthen consumer protection in the sustainable investment ecosystem based on blockchain technology. In practice, this study recommends the formulation of the Digital and ESG Consumer Protection Law, the establishment of an independent ESG verification institution, and strengthening regulatory coordination in Indonesia. The novelty of this article is its focus on three areas of analysis: ESG, blockchain, and consumer protection. All three are analyzed from a legal perspective. The limitation of this study is the absence of empirical data; future research is recommended to use a quantitative or mix-method approach to evaluate consumer behavior in the ESG blockchain platform.
Analysis of Grondkaart as Land Ownership Rights in the Perspective of Land Law in Indonesia Vitri Dini Artistry; Dewi Sulistianingsih
Journal of Private and Commercial Law Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): May, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jpcl.v8i1.454

Abstract

A land dispute case was experienced by residents of Kebonharjo, Tanjung Mas Village, Semarang City against the Indonesian Railways Limited Company (PT KAI), where PT. KAI claims that the Kebonharjo Residents' land belongs to PT. KAI with grondkaart as a proof base. The State Treasury Law is the main basis regarding grondkaart. Decision “No. 227/Pdt.G/2016/PN. Smg,” provides information that grondkaart is still legally valid. Meanwhile Law no. 5 of 1960 and Law no. 23 of 2007, provide mutual explanations regarding orders for making certificates for land rights. This article uses a normative juridical approach, and descriptive analysis of the basis of land ownership rights in the form of grondkaart. The research results show that a state based on Pancasila really prioritizes the value of material justice which originates from the will of the people who have a strong relationship with their land, so that it can be equated with human rights. The state cannot arbitrarily control people's land rights, and the law must be in accordance with the wishes of the community, namely as a form of service by the state, not a form of confiscation by the state. Grondkaart is not stronger than a land certificate, where the form of a land certificate is considered stronger because it contains the will of the community to transfer it consciously and is not a form of confiscation. From a normative juridical point of view, Indonesian land law does not adhere to legal positivism in which Indonesian society is united by the awareness in their souls to will on the basis of Pancasila, so that their will cannot be concretized by the state in the form of any regulations, but state regulations remain as a means of order and realizing shared prosperity.
Copyright Protection In Digital Rights Management Systems: Legal And Technical Challenges In Implementing Effective Solutions Aenul Yaqin; Dewi Sulistianingsih
Journal of Private and Commercial Law Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): May, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jpcl.v8i1.4170

Abstract

This research aims to examine copyright protection against unlawful acts, particularly in the context of piracy and claims over songs in the era of disruption. Through a normative juridical approach and data collection techniques via library research, this study explores the theoretical foundations of justice in law, the definition of unlawful acts, and the urgency of copyright protection for musical works. In-depth analysis is conducted on copyright discourse concerning music piracy, as well as the concept of legal protection that offers solutions and ideals for piracy or claims over songs. The research findings indicate that song piracy is not merely a common legal violation but also threatens the economic sustainability and creativity of music creators. Therefore, copyright protection must be accompanied by proactive preventive measures and effective law enforcement. In conclusion, copyright protection is a prerequisite for achieving justice in the music industry in the current digital era, requiring cross-sector collaboration and policy innovation to address the challenges faced.  
Why Hasn't Indonesia Ratified The Hague System? What's The Problem? Mohammad Reza Fachruddin; Dewi Sulistianingsih; Rodiyah; Fakhrana Nabila Atiqawati; Lisa Amalia
Journal of Private and Commercial Law Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): May, 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jpcl.v10i1.44262

Abstract

Despite its membership in key international intellectual property (IP) agreements, Indonesia has not yet acceded to the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs. This article employs a doctrinal, principle-based legal analysis to examine the alignment of Indonesia’s industrial design regime, particularly Law No. 31 of 2000, with international standards under the TRIPS Agreement, the Paris Convention, and the Geneva Act of 1999. The study analyses statutory provisions, international instruments, and case law, and is complemented by a comparative overview of jurisdictions such as Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, and Viet Nam that have already joined the Hague System. The findings reveal persistent structural issues in the Indonesian framework, including ambiguity in the novelty requirement, overlapping protection between industrial designs, copyright, and three-dimensional trademarks, as well as limited substantive examination and territorial fragmentation of protection. These legal and administrative constraints hinder the effective use of an international registration system, even though the Hague System offers procedural efficiency, cost reduction, and broader market access for designers. The article argues that targeted legislative reform and regulatory harmonization are essential preconditions for accession and contends that such reforms would enhance legal certainty, strengthen design protection, and improve Indonesia’s competitiveness in the global creative economy.
Reformasi Hukum Berbasis Teori Sistem Hukum Lawrence Friedman sebagai Upaya Solutif dalam Penanganan Aksi Anarkis Masyarakat Sipil terhadap Aparat Kepolisian Martitah Martitah; Dewi Sulistianingsih; Mayzura Kamila Sukma; Mochammad Rizky Maulana; A’an Ilham Ardiyansyah
Bookchapter Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif Vol. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Bookchapter Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Fenomena aksi anarkis dalam demonstrasi di Indonesia menunjukkan adanya persoalan mendasar dalam sistem penegakan hukum, khususnya dalam relasi antara masyarakat sipil dan aparat kepolisian. Aksi demonstrasi yang secara konstitusional dijamin sebagai hak menyampaikan pendapat kerap berujung pada bentrokan akibat penanganan yang tidak proporsional serta minimnya kepercayaan publik terhadap aparat penegak hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penanganan aksi anarkis masyarakat sipil terhadap aparat kepolisian melalui perspektif teori sistem hukum Lawrence M. Friedman yang menekankan keterkaitan antara struktur hukum, substansi hukum dan budaya hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif dengan studi literatur dan analisis deskriptif terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, laporan lembaga swadaya masyarakat, serta studi kasus demonstrasi di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa aksi anarkis dipicu oleh ketidakseimbangan sistem hukum, yang tercermin dari lemahnya mekanisme pengawasan aparat, ambiguitas regulasi terkait kebebasan berpendapat dan penggunaan kekuatan, serta rendahnya budaya hukum baik di kalangan aparat maupun masyarakat. Kesimpulan penelitian ini menegaskan perlunya reformasi hukum yang komprehensif melalui penguatan akuntabilitas aparat, penegasan regulasi yang berorientasi pada hak asasi manusia dan pembentukan budaya hukum yang mengedepankan dialog serta de-eskalasi konflik. Kontribusi penelitian ini terletak pada penguatan analisis sistemik penanganan aksi anarkis berbasis teori Friedman sebagai pendekatan preventif dalam memperkuat kepercayaan publik terhadap sistem hukum.
Implementasi Kebijakan Buku Murah pada Pemenuhan Hak Literasi Publik di Kota Semarang Sabina Syaharani Nurseha; Dini Sofia Laeliyah; Raphael Bertrand Mayaka; Martitah Martitah; Dewi Sulistianingsih
Bookchapter Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif Vol. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Bookchapter Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji implementasi kebijakan buku murah dalam pemenuhan hak literasi publik di Kota Semarang dengan menggunakan pendekatan normatif-empiris dan teori utilitarianisme John Stuart Mill sebagai landasan analisis. Melalui survei dan analisis regulasi, ditemukan bahwa keterjangkauan buku masih menjadi hambatan utama bagi mahasiswa dan pelajar, meskipun minat baca masyarakat tergolong tinggi. Kebijakan Indonesia seperti Buku Sekolah Elektronik (BSE) belum mampu menghadirkan pemerataan akses literasi secara berkelanjutan. Sebaliknya, praktik India melalui NCERT, NBT dan mekanisme Low Price Edition menunjukkan model kebijakan yang lebih sistematis dan berdampak luas, termasuk penurunan harga sekitar 20% dan distribusi hingga 150 juta eksemplar. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingginya harga buku menciptakan ketimpangan akses terhadap literatur berkualitas dan mendorong strategi alternatif seperti: pinjam, membeli buku bekas, atau mengakses versi ilegal. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini menawarkan skema kebijakan "60:40" sebagai solusi, yaitu pemerintah membeli 60% hak ekonomi buku untuk dicetak dalam versi murah, sementara penerbit tetap memproduksi 40% edisi premium. Skema ini dinilai sejalan dengan prinsip utilitarianisme yang menempatkan kebahagiaan intelektual sebagai kesenangan bermutu tinggi, sekaligus mewujudkan amanat UU Sistem Perbukuan untuk menyediakan buku yang bermutu, murah dan merata.
Tuntutan Ganti Rugi Keluarga Korban Pembunuhan: Penerapan Onrechtmatige Daad dan Keadilan Aristoteles dalam Hukum Perdata Indonesia Lisa Kristant; Fenty Nur Hidayah; Nafiza Salsabila Faliha; Dewi Sulistianingsih; Martitah Martitah
Bookchapter Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif Vol. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Bookchapter Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tindak pidana pembunuhan tidak hanya mengakibatkan konsekuensi pidana bagi pelaku, tetapi juga membuka ruang pertanggungjawaban perdata yang memungkinkan keluarga korban untuk menuntut ganti rugi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat bagaimana Pasal 1370 KUHPerdata berlaku bagi tuntutan ganti rugi keluarga korban pembunuhan. Studi ini menggunakan teori onrechtmatige daad L.C. Hoffman dan teori keadilan Aristoteles sebagai kerangka teoretis. Penelitian ini menerapkan metode kualitatif dan mengklasifikasikan jenis penelitian sebagai hukum normatif dengan melakukan kajian pustaka terhadap sumber hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Temuan penelitian mengindikasikan bahwa keluarga pihak yang dirugikan memiliki landasan hukum yang kokoh untuk meminta kompensasi sesuai dengan Pasal 1370 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Konsep onrechtmatige daad, yang mencakup komponen tindakan melanggar hukum, kesalahan, kerugian dan hubungan kausal, membentuk struktur hukum dari pasal ini. Dalam menentukan proporsionalitas ganti rugi berdasarkan kemampuan ekonomi pelaku dan kebutuhan pemulihan korban, teori keadilan Aristoteles memberikan dimensi filosofis. Studi ini memberikan panduan menyeluruh yang mengintegrasikan aspek hukum formal, konsep tanggung jawab perdata dan prinsip keadilan untuk menawarkan perlindungan hukum yang signifikan kepada keluarga korban pembunuhan di dalam sistem hukum perdata di Indonesia.
Keadilan Substantif dalam Putusan Kasus Korupsi Harvey Moeis: Analisis Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch Iftina Cahyanda Putri Aimee; Ginta Amelia Cahya; Annisa Rukhillah Nur Fahturosa; Martitah Martitah; Dewi Sulistianingsih
Bookchapter Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif Vol. 5 (2026)
Publisher : Bookchapter Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas penerapan keadilan substantif dalam putusan kasus korupsi Harvey Moeis dengan menggunakan teori hukum Gustav Radbruch sebagai dasar analisis. Melalui metode studi literatur, penelitian menelaah putusan pengadilan, ketentuan UU Tipikor, teori kepastian hukum Jan Michiel Otto, serta konsep keadilan substantif yang menekankan integrasi antara kepastian hukum, keadilan dan kemanfaatan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa putusan tingkat pertama yang menjatuhkan pidana 6 tahun 6 bulan belum mencerminkan proporsionalitas terhadap besarnya kerugian negara yang mencapai ratusan triliun rupiah. Ketidaksesuaian ini menimbulkan disparitas pemidanaan apabila dibandingkan dengan kasus-kasus korupsi besar lainnya, sehingga memunculkan pertanyaan mengenai konsistensi dan efektivitas pemidanaan di Indonesia. Dalam perspektif Radbruch, putusan tersebut belum sepenuhnya memenuhi tuntutan keadilan substantif dan kemanfaatan sosial, terutama karena belum memberikan efek jera yang kuat dan belum sepenuhnya memulihkan kepercayaan publik. Studi ini berkontribusi pada wacana reformasi pemidanaan dengan menegaskan perlunya pedoman pemidanaan yang lebih terukur dan konsisten dalam perkara korupsi.
Freedom of Speech: Democracy or a Threat to the Country? Bojezziera Emmet Syaiba Arrasheen Arrasheen; Maula Inayah; Ahmad Dzaki Bagus Andrian; Alya Dwiana Aufani; Dewi Sulistianingsih
Indonesia Media Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January-June, 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/imrev.v5i1.36595

Abstract

Freedom of speech is a fundamental human right protected by Indonesia’s Constitution and is an essential component of democratic life. However, its implementation faces serious challenges due to ambiguous laws, such as the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), and the low level of political and digital literacy among citizens. This study employs a descriptive qualitative method using literature review to examine how freedom of speech is practiced in Indonesia and the factors that hinder it within the Pancasila democratic framework. The findings reveal that freedom of speech remains caught between the protection of individual rights and the pursuit of state stability. Misinterpretations of criticism as threats, coupled with repressive legal actions, have limited public expression. In the digital era, social media provides space for public participation but also raises issues of misinformation and hate speech. Therefore, reforms in regulation, improved digital literacy, and stronger civic education are necessary to align freedom of expression with Pancasila values—ensuring that it is exercised ethically, responsibly, and constructively for the advancement of Indonesian democracy.
Co-Authors Abdul Muftar Rifki Maulana Abraham Abraham Abraham Abraham Achmad Fahmi Zulfikar Adinda Febriza Aditya Irvine Raiza, Faiz Adnan Ibrahim Sarhan Aenul Yaqin Aghnia Widya Avina Agus Sulistiyanto, Sadam agustin, windi Ahmad Bayhaqi Ahmad Dzaki Bagus Andrian Ahmad Habib Al Fikry Ainun Qadisah , Altares Aisyah Rahmania Jelita Ali Masyhar Alkhair, Rayyan Alya Dwiana Aufani Amelia Eka Rahmawati andaniswari, okky Andry Setiawan Andry Setiawan Andry Setiawan, Andry Andry Setyawan, Andry Anggeraeni, Ayuk Anggraeni , Andini Eka Aninda Nur Indah Ramadani Anindya, Nasywa Alif Anis Widyawati Annisa Rukhillah Nur Fahturosa Aprila Niravita, Aprila Apriliana Khomsa Kinanti Apriliana Khomsa Kinanti Apriliyanto, Muhamad Syahrul Ardana, Zalfaa Pramesty Arif Hidayat Arif Hidayat Arifa, Masyitha Aulia Aryanda, Avilla Deva Asep Rozali Asep Rozali Asep Rozali, Asep Ayahan, Hafal Baliq Azizah, Afidatul Azzahra, Inas Fathia Azzahra A’an Ilham Ardiyansyah Bagas Bilowo Nurtantyono Satata Bagus Setyadi, Hudha Bin Hassan, Muhammad Sayuti Bintang Rafli Ananta Binti Mohd Yusoff, Rahmawati Bojezziera Emmet Syaiba Arrasheen Arrasheen Christian Bagas Christian Isal Sanggalangi Dani Muhtada Danis Danendra Adhi Dave, Yehezkiel Aldorino Didya Deni Haspada Desi Nurlaeli , Putri Devara, Hafiz Rama Dewi Fatmawati Dini Sofia Laeliyah Dita Safitri Nurwidihantari Dyajeng Ayu Musdalifah edi pramono Elania Aisyah Fakhrana Nabila Atiqawati Fakhrirafi Zharfan Farras Eknu Albin Fauzan, Moh. Mustakim Fauzi, Agvin Fenty Nur Hidayah Fibriani, Indira Firdaus, Gilbert Gasaga, Angga Giarningtyas, Naufalia Ginta Amelia Cahya Ginting, Nurul Agustina Haidarrani, Ananda Hairani, Justika handayani, mei Handriyanto Wijaya Harry Nugroho, Harry Hendri Januar Romadhon Hermawan, Adellya Salsabilla Hesty Alya Utami Iftina Cahyanda Putri Aimee Ilmiyah, Nofika Irawaty Jafar Sidik Jafar Sidik Jaya Adi Putra Jesi Alexander Alim Jihan Pinasti, Kana JOKO SUSANTO K. Nadine Felicia Putri Karuna, Indrayana Chandra KS, Nayif Zayyaan Musyaffa’ L., Khasanah S. Laga Sugiarto Laga Sugiarto Larasati, Pradita Adila Lestari, Berlian Putri Hayu Lisa Amalia Lisa Kristant M Riski Amin M Mafrucha, Zunatul Maharani, Ferra Tiara Martitah Martya Putri, Bernadeta Aprilla Masrukhi Masrukhi Masyitha Aulia Arifa Maula Inayah Maulida, Hifzani Mayzura Kamila Sukma Mentari Berliana Kemala Dewi Miftakhul Ihwan Mila Rizki Aulia Mochammad Rizky Maulana Mochammad Shidqon Prabowo Moh. Mustakim Fauzan Mohammad Katerina Ronaldi Mohammad Reza Fachruddin Mohammad Reza Fachruddin Mohd Yusoff, Rahmawati Mubarokah, Wakhidatul Muchammad Shidqon Prabowo Muchtar, Putri Fadhilla Muh. Algifari Muhammad Abid A Syakur Muhammad Nurul Amin Muhklasin, Raden Muhammad Mukti, Wisnu Ali Musafa, Alief Qurratul Ain Mutia Yulita Sari Nafi, Zidna Ilma Nafiza Salsabila Faliha Najwa Hanif Artfian Arrasyid Aulia Putra Nasarudin Abdul Rahman Nazwa Nursakinah Neni Hermita Ngboawaji Daniel Nte Ningsih, Ayup Suran Nor Fitriana, Desy Nugraheni, Prasasti Dyah Nurrohmah Nurrohmah, Nurrohmah Oleg Orlov Pangesti, Delia Panusunan Panusunan Prabowo, Bima PRAMONO, SIGIT EKA Pramudita, Wahyu Sinta Dewi Primerta Putri Hapsari Puji Lestari, Diaj Pujiono Pujiono Pujiono Pujiono Purnama, Galuh Putri Putra, I Made Widia Wirya Putra, Muhammad Reza Wahyu Artura PUTRI, VIVIE NOVINDA SEKAR Putu Rahayu, Sang Ayu Qadisah, Altares Ainun R. Kemala Nababan R. Suharto Raden Muhammad Arvy Ilyasa Rahmawan Dianto Ramli, Asmarani Raphael Bertrand Mayaka Ratna Laniati Renggha Prima Ridwan Arifin Rifqa Gusmida Syahrun Barokah Rindia Fanny Kusumaningtyas Rini Fidiyani Rini Fidiyani Rini Fidiyani Rini Fidiyani Risqi Budi Ristina Yudhanti Rodiyah Rodiyah - Rois Faisal Sabina Syaharani Nurseha Saefudin Saefudin Safitri, Gianefi Salman Alfarisi Salsabila, Arini Sang Ayu Putu Rahayu Sarah Atikasari Sari, Gholin Noor Aulia Saru Arifin Sasvia, Hayyu Satata, Bagas Bilowo Nurtantyono Septhian Eka Adiyatma Shidqon Prabowo, Muchammad Sinaga, Dearni Meli Asih Siti Susanti, Siti Slamet Sumarto SUGIARTO, LAGA Suhadi Suhadi Suroso, Brian Ahmad Syakila, Nabila Putri Takwim Azami Triyono Triyono Ulya, Zakiah Utami, Melliniarini Dibura Vitri Dini Artistry Wafiroh, Avina Wahyu Setiaji Wardhani, Harumsari Puspa Wedhatami, Bayangsari Widyaningsih, Ratna Wijaya, Christian Chandra Windi Agustin Yudistira, Ivan Bhakti Yuli Prasetyo Adhi Yuli Prasetyo Adhi Yuli Prasetyo Adhi Yuli Prasetyo Adhi Yuli Prasetyo Adhi Yuni Anan Yusoff, Rahmawati Mohd Yves Paath Zahirotul Hikmah, Cindy Noor Laila Zahirotul Hikmah Zahra Az Sha’idah Zakya, Sarah Maulidya