Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
14.076
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Rechtsidee Jurnal Daulat Hukum Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi) Hasanuddin Law Review Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Bina Hukum Lingkungan NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial International Journal of Supply Chain Management JURNAL MERCATORIA Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Law Review Unes Law Review Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni Jurnal Al-Dustur JUSTISI Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Progressive Law Review Jurnal Hukum Adigama JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Suara Hukum Academia Open Jurnal Scientia Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis SUPREMASI Jurnal Hukum Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service Indonesian Journal of International Law JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND BUSINESS (JHSSB) Law Development Journal The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research Az Zarqa': Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Islam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) International Journal Of Economics Social And Technology Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Bina Hukum Lingkungan Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Journal of Business, Management and Social Studies Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities LamLaj Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities Jurnal Serina Abdimas
Ariawan Gunadi
Faculty of Law, Tarumanagara University
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 135 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 135 Documents
Search

 10   11   12   13   14 
Private Sector and the 1% Disability Quota: Legal Responsibilities in Indonesia Agustin, Dila Wahyu; Gunadi, Ariawan
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.362

Abstract

The background of this research is the challenge of fulfilling the 1% disability employment quota by private companies in Indonesia, in accordance with Law No. 8 of 2016 on Persons with Disabilities. Despite the regulations outlining this obligation, companies often face obstacles such as low legal awareness, social stigma, and a lack of disability-friendly infrastructure. This study employs a juridical-normative research method with statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches to relevant regulations and their implementation practices. The findings show that although the government has made efforts to encourage companies to meet the disability quota through incentives and sanctions, consistent implementation remains limited. Strengthening oversight and increasing legal awareness are necessary to address these challenges. Additionally, applicable solutions include improving accessibility facilities and providing training programs for companies to better address the challenges of disability inclusion.
Issuer Compliance with Disclosure Principles in Insider Trading in the Indonesian Capital Market: A Comparative Study with Singapore and the United States from an Investor Protection Perspective: Kepatuhan Emiten Terhadap Prinsip Disclosure dalam Insider Trading di Pasar Modal Indonesia Perbandingan dengan Singapura dan Amerika Serikat: Perspektif Perlindungan Investor Joeliant, Hanz Bryan; Gunadi, Ariawan
Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1095

Abstract

General Background: Insider trading and weak information disclosure undermine market integrity and investor protection. Specific Background: In Indonesia, disclosure obligations under the Capital Market Law, OJK regulations, and IDX rules remain limited in timeliness, insider categorization, and enforcement compared to Singapore and the United States. Knowledge Gap: Existing studies have not systematically compared issuer compliance with disclosure principles across these jurisdictions to assess their effectiveness in preventing insider trading. Aims: This study analyzes Indonesia’s disclosure framework, compares it with Singapore and the U.S., and evaluates necessary reforms to enhance investor protection. Results: Findings show Indonesia’s two-day disclosure window, narrow insider definition, and predominantly administrative sanctions weaken deterrence, while Singapore’s immediate disclosure model and the U.S.’s broad misappropriation theory, real-time surveillance, and strong enforcement provide higher compliance and detection levels. Novelty: This research integrates doctrinal, conceptual, and comparative analyses to demonstrate how adopting broader insider definitions, accelerated disclosure, and technology-driven monitoring can strengthen Indonesia’s regulatory structure. Implications: Strengthening OJK–IDX integration, enhancing surveillance capacity, reforming insider trading provisions, and adopting international best practices are essential to improving market transparency and long-term investor confidence. Highlights: Indonesia’s disclosure rules remain slower and less comprehensive than Singapore and the U.S. Broader insider definitions and real-time surveillance improve detection and deterrence. Strengthened OJK–IDX integration is essential for effective enforcement and investor protection. Keywords: Insider Trading, Disclosure, Investor Protection, Capital Market Regulation, Comparative Study
A Comparative Study on Legal Protection for Consumers Using Digital Lending Services in Indonesia and Singapore from the Perspective of Legal Development Theory: Perbandingan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen Pengguna Layanan Pendanaan Digital antara Indonesia dan Singapura dalam Perspektif Teori Pembangunan Hukum Febrianto, Rizky; Gunadi, Ariawan
Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1096

Abstract

General Background: The rapid expansion of digital lending in Indonesia and Singapore reflects a broader transformation in financial technology that demands stronger regulatory safeguards. Specific Background: Despite regulatory efforts, Indonesia continues to face challenges of weak supervision, low industry compliance, and high exposure to illegal platforms, whereas Singapore has established a more structured and integrated regulatory model. Knowledge Gap: Comparative analyses examining both countries’ legal frameworks through the lens of Legal Development Theory remain limited, particularly regarding their effectiveness in ensuring consumer protection. Aims: This study analyzes and compares the legal protection mechanisms governing digital lending in Indonesia and Singapore while assessing their alignment with legal development principles. Results: Findings show Indonesia relies on POJK 40/2024, Consumer Protection Law, and Personal Data Protection Law, yet enforcement remains inconsistent; in contrast, Singapore’s Payment Services Act, CPFTA, PDPA, and MAS compliance-based supervision ensure stronger preventive regulation and more efficient dispute resolution. Novelty: This research integrates comparative regulatory analysis with Legal Development Theory to reveal differing developmental orientations of both jurisdictions. Implications: Strengthening supervisory capacity and enforcement is essential for Indonesia to build a safer, equitable, and innovation-supportive digital lending ecosystem. Highlights: Strong contrast exists between Indonesia’s fragmented enforcement and Singapore’s integrated MAS-led regulatory model. Singapore emphasizes preventive, risk-based oversight, while Indonesia remains largely reactive to emerging problems. Effective consumer protection hinges not only on regulation completeness but also on consistent supervision and institutional capacity. Keywords: Digital Lending, Consumer Protection, Fintech Regulation, Legal Development Theory, Comparative Law
Legal Liability for Violations of Outsourced Workers’ Rights in Indonesia from the Perspective of Comparative Joint Liability Principles in Spain and the Philippines: Pertanggungjawaban Hukum atas Pelanggaran Hak Pekerja Outsourcing di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Perbandingan Prinsip Joint Liability di Spanyol dan Filipina Christina, Nadya; Gunadi, Ariawan
Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1097

Abstract

General Background: The widespread adoption of outsourcing in Indonesia aims to enhance corporate flexibility and efficiency. Specific Background: Despite comprehensive regulation under UU 13/2003, UU 6/2023, and PP 35/2021, outsourced workers frequently experience violations of fundamental rights due to unclear allocation of legal responsibilities between outsourcing providers and user companies. Knowledge Gap: Existing Indonesian regulations place full liability solely on outsourcing companies, leaving limited legal remedies when providers fail to fulfil obligations, unlike countries applying joint liability. Aims: This study analyzes Indonesia’s legal framework on outsourced workers’ rights and compares it with the joint liability principles adopted in Spain and the Philippines. Results: Findings indicate that Indonesia’s system creates structural protection gaps, while Spain and the Philippines impose solidary responsibility on both provider and user companies, ensuring stronger enforcement of wages, social security, and working conditions. Novelty: This research provides a comparative legal perspective demonstrating how joint liability can operate as an equitable mechanism for outsourced worker protection. Implications: Adoption of joint liability in Indonesia could enhance legal certainty, prevent responsibility evasion, and strengthen workers’ access to remedies, offering a policy alternative for future legislative reform. Highlights: Indonesia’s current framework places full responsibility on outsourcing providers, creating protection gaps. Spain and the Philippines strengthen worker rights through solidary (joint) liability between providers and user companies. Joint liability offers a viable reform option to enhance fairness and legal certainty for outsourced workers in Indonesia. Keywords: Outsourcing, Legal Liability, Joint Liability, Worker Protection, Comparative Labor Law
A Juridical Analysis of the Cancellation of Registered Trademarks Due to Non-Use: A Comparative Study of Indonesian and UK Law: Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penghapusan Merek Terdaftar Akibat Tidak Digunakan: Perbandingan Hukum Indonesia dan Inggris Kurniawan, Cicelly Chiesa; Gunadi, Ariawan
Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1099

Abstract

General background: Legal protection of trademarks is fundamental to ensuring fairness and business certainty because exclusive rights apply only when marks are continuously used. Specific background: In Indonesia, cancellation of trademarks due to non-use for three consecutive years under Article 74 of Law No. 20/2016 remains challenging despite clear statutory provisions. Knowledge gap: Inconsistent judicial interpretations and the absence of uniform evidentiary standards create ongoing legal uncertainty. Aims: This study examines Indonesia’s mechanism for cancelling unused trademarks and compares it with the United Kingdom’s revocation system. Results: The findings show that Indonesia faces difficulties in proving non-use and maintaining consistent legal reasoning, while the UK—through the Trademarks Act 1994—implements structured administrative procedures, defined evidentiary criteria, and opportunities for non-litigation resolution. Novelty: This research offers a detailed comparative analysis that exposes procedural weaknesses in Indonesia when contrasted with a more mature and transparent system. Implications: The study suggests that Indonesia must strengthen evidentiary standards and refine administrative processes to enhance legal certainty, prevent passive monopolies, and reinforce effective trademark protection in modern commerce. Highlights: Focuses on cancellation of registered trademarks due to non-use in Indonesia and the UK. Identifies legal uncertainty in Indonesia from inconsistent interpretation of “three consecutive years” and proof standards. Highlights the UK’s clearer, more structured revocation procedures as a model for improving Indonesian law. Keywords: Trademark Cancellation, Non-Use, Legal Protection, Revocation
PENERAPAN FIDUCIARY DUTY TERHADAP DIREKSI DALAM KASUS PENCURIAN ASET OLEH PEKERJA Pasyah, Rabbil Arya; Gunadi, Ariawan
Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, Desember 2025
Publisher : Postgraduate Bosowa University Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35965/ijlf.v8i1.7903

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji penerapan fiduciary duty terhadap direksi dalam konteks kasus pencurian aset oleh pekerja dengan fokus pada bagaimana kelalaian pengawasan dapat mengarah pada pertanggungjawaban hukum yang melekat pada jabatan direksi sebagai organ pengurus perseroan. Fenomena pencurian aset internal menunjukkan bahwa risiko kerugian perusahaan tidak hanya berasal dari pihak eksternal, tetapi juga dari individu yang berada dalam struktur operasional perusahaan, sehingga efektivitas pengawasan internal menjadi elemen fundamental dalam menilai keberhasilan tugas fidusia direksi. Analisis dilakukan melalui metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus untuk mengidentifikasi standar kehati-hatian profesional (duty of care) serta standar loyalitas (duty of loyalty) yang wajib dilaksanakan oleh direksi dalam menjalankan fungsi pengurusan dan pengendalian aset perusahaan. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa kelalaian direksi dalam merancang, menerapkan, dan mengevaluasi sistem pengendalian internal dapat dikategorikan sebagai pelanggaran fiduciary duty yang menimbulkan konsekuensi perdata maupun pidana, karena pengawasan merupakan kewajiban yang tidak dapat didelegasikan kepada pihak lain. Selain itu, penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa implementasi Good Corporate Governance berfungsi sebagai instrumen struktural untuk mengukur kualitas pengawasan internal dan tingkat akuntabilitas direksi dalam menjaga kepentingan perusahaan. Kontribusi penelitian ini terletak pada identifikasi hubungan simultan antara kelalaian pengawasan, pelanggaran fiduciary duty, dan kerentanan aset perusahaan, sehingga memberikan landasan teoretis dan praktis bagi perusahaan dalam merancang sistem pengawasan yang lebih adaptif, terukur, dan efektif. This study examines the application of fiduciary duty to the board of directors in cases involving asset theft committed by employees, with a specific focus on how supervisory negligence can lead to legal accountability inherent in the position of directors as the primary managerial organ of a corporation. The phenomenon of internal asset theft demonstrates that corporate losses do not solely originate from external actors but may also arise from individuals within the operational structure of the company, highlighting the centrality of internal control mechanisms as the primary benchmark for evaluating the fulfillment of directors' fiduciary responsibilities. This research employs a normative juridical method through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches to identify the standards of professional prudence (duty of care) and loyalty (duty of loyalty) that directors must uphold in managing corporate assets and ensuring proper oversight. The findings indicate that failures in establishing, implementing, and maintaining an effective internal control system may constitute a breach of fiduciary duty, giving rise to civil or even criminal liability, since supervisory obligations are non-delegable in nature. Moreover, the study emphasizes that the implementation of Good Corporate Governance serves as a structural mechanism for assessing the quality of internal supervision and the extent of directors' accountability in protecting corporate interests. The contribution of this research lies in its systematic identification of the simultaneous relationship between supervisory negligence, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate asset vulnerability, thereby offering both theoretical insights and practical guidance for companies to design more adaptive, measurable, and effective internal control systems.
EVALUASI PENERAPAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PREVENTIF BERBASIS GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP RISIKO KEPAILITAN DI PT. SRITEX Muzacky, Ahmad; Gunadi, Ariawan
Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, Desember 2025
Publisher : Postgraduate Bosowa University Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35965/ijlf.v8i1.7904

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji kegagalan penerapan prinsip Good Corporate Governance pada PT Sri Rejeki Isman Tbk (Sritex) serta mengevaluasi efektivitas kebijakan hukum preventif dalam mencegah risiko kepailitan pada perusahaan publik. Analisis dilakukan melalui pendekatan hukum normatif yang mengintegrasikan telaah peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum korporasi, dan analisis putusan Mahkamah Agung mengenai penetapan kepailitan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kelemahan struktural pada mekanisme pengawasan internal, rendahnya transparansi laporan keuangan, serta pengambilan keputusan ekspansi tanpa analisis risiko yang memadai telah menciptakan ketidakseimbangan antara aset dan liabilitas perusahaan. Kondisi tersebut diperparah oleh lemahnya fungsi komite audit dan dewan komisaris yang tidak menjalankan prinsip kehati-hatian dan tidak memberikan intervensi terhadap kebijakan yang berisiko tinggi. Selain itu, kebijakan hukum preventif yang seharusnya menjadi instrumen utama untuk mengantisipasi potensi pelanggaran tata kelola tidak diimplementasikan secara substansial, sehingga membuka ruang bagi disfungsi manajerial yang berujung pada kegagalan perusahaan memenuhi kewajiban kepada kreditur. Penelitian ini menegaskan urgensi reformulasi tata kelola korporasi melalui integrasi yang kuat antara prinsip GCG dan instrumen hukum preventif agar perusahaan publik mampu menjaga integritas, stabilitas finansial, dan kepercayaan pemangku kepentingan. Temuan penelitian memberikan kontribusi teoretis bagi pengembangan ilmu hukum perusahaan serta menawarkan rekomendasi praktis mengenai model tata kelola yang lebih efektif dalam mencegah risiko kepailitan. This study examines the failure of Good Corporate Governance implementation at PT Sri Rejeki Isman Tbk (Sritex) and evaluates the effectiveness of preventive legal policies in mitigating bankruptcy risks within publicly listed companies. The analysis employs a normative legal approach that integrates statutory review, corporate law doctrine, and judicial analysis of the Supreme Court decision declaring the company bankrupt. The findings indicate that structural weaknesses within internal control mechanisms, inadequate transparency of financial disclosures, and strategic expansion decisions made without comprehensive risk assessment contributed significantly to the imbalance between the company’s assets and liabilities. These conditions were exacerbated by the limited effectiveness of the audit committee and board of commissioners, both of which failed to apply prudent oversight and intervene in high-risk managerial actions. In addition, preventive legal policies—intended to function as essential tools for early detection of governance violations—were not implemented substantively, creating a governance gap that enabled managerial discretion to escalate into financial distress and ultimate insolvency. The study underscores the necessity of reformulating corporate governance frameworks through the integration of robust GCG principles and preventive legal instruments to strengthen corporate integrity, financial stability, and stakeholder confidence. These findings contribute to corporate law scholarship and provide practical recommendations for developing more effective governance models capable of preventing bankruptcy risks in publicly listed companies.
Konsep Tanggung Jawab Negara Terhadap Kewajiban Melindungi Data Pribadi Masyarakat di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Kebocoran Data NPWP Masyarakat Indonesia) Marshella Cenyvesta; Ariawan Gunadi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 12 (2024): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research explores the criteria and standard This study examines the importance of personal data protection in Indonesia within the rapidly evolving digital era. Personal data, such as information contained in Taxpayer Identification Numbers, holds significant economic value and may be misused if it falls into irresponsible hands. While personal data plays a vital role in business strategies and the improvement of products or services, the risk of data misuse—whether on the black market or through fraudulent activities—highlights the urgency of stricter protection measures. Since the implementation of the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEoI) system in 2018, Indonesia has committed to automatically exchanging taxpayer information with other countries to enhance tax transparency and reduce tax evasion. This research adopts a normative legal research methodology and aims to provide solutions for addressing the challenges of personal data protection in an increasingly complex digital landscape. Despite existing regulations, there remains a lack of adequate provisions specifically addressing the protection of taxpayers’ personal data in international information exchange processes. This study seeks to analyze the concept of state responsibility in safeguarding citizens' personal data and to promote the development of stronger policies regarding personal data protection in Indonesia. s essential to ensure that the use of Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia occurs ethically and responsibly. Identifying transparency, accountability, fairness, and data security and privacy as key pillars, the research underscores the importance of integrating ethical principles in all Artificial Intelligence development and deployment phases. Using a normative type of research by analyzing the existing legal and ethical framework and through legislative and comparative approaches, this research provides recommendations for strengthening AI regulations in Indonesia, thereby minimizing the risk of loss and increasing public trust in this technology.
Hubungan Hukum Antara Perusahaan Properti dan Konsumen dalam Jual Beli Rumah Melalui Sistem Pre-Project Selling Calvita; Ariawan Gunadi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 9 (2024): Hukum Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In general, property companies in Indonesia utilize the pre-project selling system. However, this system often leads to legal issues, particularly for buyers, as it creates uncertainty and risks. One of the main reasons for these problems is that the objects being traded, whether houses or related facilities, are not yet available or completed at the time the transaction is conducted.This study employs a normative legal method with a regulatory and case study approach. The legal materials used include primary and secondary sources. The analysis is conducted qualitatively through deductive reasoning, and the results are presented descriptively. The findings indicate that the rights and obligations between parties in the pre-project selling system often rely on the principle of freedom of contract, as stipulated in Article 1338 of the Indonesian Civil Code. This provision includes exoneration clauses and grants significant protection to property companies. The official transfer of ownership rights can only occur after the issuance of the Deed of Sale and Purchase (Akta Jual Beli, or AJB) before a Land Deed Official (Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah, or PPAT). The study concludes that with the development of modern contract theories and consumer protection law, the primary focus is no longer solely on agreement and formal obligations but rather on ensuring fairness in providing information to consumers through the pre-project selling system. Property companies are prohibited from handing over the property or collecting more than 80% of payments from buyers if the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli, or PPJB) has not been executed. Furthermore, the PPJB must be drawn up before a notary to prevent future disputes.
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Tindakan Overclaim Produk Kosmetika Sediaan Sunscreen Pascal Amadeo Yapputro; Ariawan Gunadi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 12 (2024): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia is a country with high levels of solar radiation, making it essential for its people to protect their skin from sun exposure during daily activities. Generally, people use sunscreen products to shield their skin. Sunscreen is a cosmetic product containing Sun Protection Factor (SPF) and Protection Grade of UVA (PA), which provide protection against sun exposure. Prolonged exposure to the sun can cause negative effects such as skin cancer and redness, increasing the demand for sunscreen products among the public. With the significant demand for sunscreen, many businesses are selling these products. To attract customers and boost sales, businesses often use advertising as a marketing strategy. However, an issue has arisen in the marketing of these products—businesses engaging in overclaim practices. Overclaim refers to the act of exaggerating the benefits of a product, presenting claims that do not align with the product's actual properties. Such practices violate consumer rights and can harm consumers. Currently, consumer protection is regulated by Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. Articles 7 to 17 of this law prohibit overclaim practices, as they constitute deception toward consumers. Advertising that involves overclaiming may result in consumer losses. Furthermore, in accordance with the law, businesses are required to take responsibility for any harm caused to consumers due to overclaim practices. The adverse effects of overclaiming may lead to a mismatch between the consumer's skin type and the ingredients in the sunscreen product.
Co-Authors Agustin, Dila Wahyu Alberta, Alberta Alexander Arcelino Gunadi Amad Sudiro Ambarita, Dicki Candra Amrie Firmansyah Andre Kiemas Anthony Willyus Wongkar Antonius Ferry Bastian Aprilia, Indah Siti Aulia, Riska Awuy, Euginia Nataniela Ayu Puspita Sari Baehaqi Bianty, Thisia Bondan Cahyadi Budi Prana Prasetyo Calvita Candra, Marvin Carsnelly, Eileen Cendranita, Ivannia Chandra, Edwin Chandra, Yulius Charomain, Mochammad Imam Christina, Nadya Christopher David Nagaria Claudia, Zulian Clementino Moningka, Yosia Cornelia Alpha Daniel Daniel Darren Andreas Dave Chrysander Defilania, Oktri Dewi Rahma Dewi Wulandari Dharmasetya, Lani Ekaratri, Azkia Elysia Wilhelmina Rengkung Endison Ravlindo Evelyn Fahri, Achmad Febrianto, Rizky Ferdinandus Zulvacar, Nathanael Ezekiel Fionita, Jessica Frederick Septian Tuwan Fredrik Siregar, Aristoteles Gerhard Frisca Delicia, Nadya Frisca Frisca Grace Priskilla Suwanto Graciella, Eunike Gumintang, Galuh Gilang Gunardi Gunardi Gunawan, Berry Hakim, M. Rizky Aulia Harjanto, Devy Yulyana Hasan, Laura Kurniadi Herman Joseph Hummerson, Laureen Aurora Ilyasa, Farhan Hamka Irma, Febriana Jennifer Jennifer Jessica Candakentjana Jessica Jessica Joeliant, Hanz Bryan Juan Davis Elhanan Kamil, Renita Kevin Veronica Halim Khanifa Fauziah Khantidevi Lukmadi, Fionna Khutub, Muhammad Kiemas, Andre Kurniawan, Cicelly Chiesa Lestari, Novianti Lina Kristie Yonathin Lisa Putri Utami Loka, Silvia Lukita, Hans Made Aubrey Josephine Angelina Mahardhika, Dutasena Mahieu, Feybiola Cecilia Makawowor, Chelsea The Marchel Thobie Maria Cecilia Nugroho Marshella Cenyvesta Martheo, Felicia Martono Martono Matheus, Juan Mayvians, Tidelstein Melani Harly Melvina Michelle Nathania Michelle Starla Ongko Michelle, Grace Bernadette Mingga, Britney Wilhelmina Berlian Mita, Ermita Ekalia Monica Blazinky Muhammad Abdurrohim Muhammad Awal Alishakur Muhammad Theo Rizki Putra Muzacky, Ahmad Nadhea Tungga Devi Naftalie, Livia Aurelia Nagaria, Christopher David Nugroho, Hizkia Ivan Oping, Timothy Farrel Pagrelia, Yuda Tri Panji Ramadhan Paramitha, Chintya Lie Pascal Amadeo Yapputro Pasyah, Rabbil Arya Petrosina Matauseja Huka, Christia Prasanti, Nandani Bayu Puspa Hartanto, Adinda Puspita, Lidya Putri, Amanda Fitriani Eka Putri, Amelia Natalie Putri, Destia Liana Putri, Pricilia Dwi Anggreni Putri, Qonita Rizqi Iffani Raymond Kusuma Reyza Julianda Mahabati Ricky Ricky Rimandita, Tiffani Rizki, Muhamad Abdul Jamil Rohaya, Nizla Salim, Gerardus Aldo Samudra, Muhammad Bima Samuel, Maria Gabriela Samuel, Yoel sari, nike kumala Shahan, Akbar Helmie Nur Shasmita, Sylvia Stephanie Patricia Prasetyo Suwinto Johan Sylvia, Sylvia Tanera, Lauren Teddy Francis Theresia Wijaya Tsabita, Nabilla Mahva Vanessa Widjaja Vianka, Maria Ibella Vina Octavia Vincent Vincent, Vincent Vivi Heniasy Wanibe, Kenji Dustin Wonohadidjojo, Christopher Howard Yanuar Putra Erwin Yolanda, Maureen Keisha Yudha, Ivan Tirta