Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
13.95
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Rechtsidee Jurnal Daulat Hukum Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi) Hasanuddin Law Review Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Bina Hukum Lingkungan NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial International Journal of Supply Chain Management JURNAL MERCATORIA Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Law Review Unes Law Review Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni Jurnal Al-Dustur JUSTISI Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Progressive Law Review Jurnal Hukum Adigama JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Suara Hukum Jurnal Scientia Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis SUPREMASI Jurnal Hukum Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service Indonesian Journal of International Law JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND BUSINESS (JHSSB) Law Development Journal The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research Az Zarqa': Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Islam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) International Journal Of Economics Social And Technology Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Journal of Business, Management and Social Studies Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities LamLaj Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities Jurnal Serina Abdimas
Ariawan Gunadi
Faculty of Law, Tarumanagara University
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 132 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 132 Documents
Search

 10   11   12   13   14 
The Protection of Secured Creditors in the Execution of Collateral in Bankruptcy Sari, Ayu Puspita; Gunadi, Ariawan
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.49005

Abstract

The objective of this journal study is to examine and analyze the safeguards for Secured Creditors regarding the enforcement of property guarantees following a bankruptcy ruling against the debtor. This research employs a normative legal approach, utilizing legislation, a conceptual perspective, and case studies. The findings indicate that the position of Secured Creditors in case number 527 K/Pdt. Sus-Pailit/2020 emphasizes that the right to execute on property guarantees remains intact, even with a 90-day suspension period post-bankruptcy decision. This suspension does not eliminate the preferential status concerning debt repayment. During this time, the curator is prohibited from selling or taking control of the collateral without the Secured Creditor's consent. Specific regulations are needed to protect Secured Creditors, ensuring that the execution of their property guarantees under suspension remains under their oversight, to promote fairness, legal certainty, and proportional protection of their rights during the bankruptcy process.
Legal Certainty Regarding the Rights of Secured Creditors to Execute Collateral in Bankruptcy Proceedings in Indonesia Sari, Ayu Puspita; Gunadi, Ariawan
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2600

Abstract

Separate Creditors as Holders of Security Rights possess a preferential claim over the secured collateral. However, under bankruptcy law, their rights to execute and auction the collateral are subject to statutory limitations. In practice, Supreme Court Decision No. 521 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021 and Supreme Court Decision No. 527 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020 have provided divergent interpretations regarding the execution rights of Separate Creditors over their collateral once the debtor has been declared bankrupt. The core issues examined in this research are: (1) How legal certainty is afforded to the execution rights of Separate Creditors pursuant to Supreme Court Decisions No. 521 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021 and No. 527 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020; and (2) What legal consequences arise for Separate Creditors who fail to execute their collateral under Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU). This study employs normative legal research using a statutory approach and case-based analysis, focusing on judicial interpretations of bankruptcy decisions affecting the execution rights of Separate Creditors. The research relies on secondary data obtained through literature review and applies qualitative analytical methods. Separate Creditors are granted a two-month period following insolvency to initiate execution proceedings by filing a public auction request with the KPKNL, which is calculated from the commencement of the execution process not from the completion of the auction. Furthermore, the rights of Separate Creditors are not absolute, as they are constrained by a statutory stay period of 90 (ninety) days from the date the debtor is declared bankrupt. During this stay period, the Curator is entitled to demand that the collateral held by Separate Creditors be transferred to the Curator for sale either through public auction or private sale, under the supervision of the Supervisory Judge. It is therefore necessary to revise Law No. 37 of 2004 to clarify the scope of authority held by Separate Creditors in executing collateral, and to establish a digital oversight mechanism for curatorial functions to ensure transparency and accountability when collateral is handed over to the Curator for auction.
Kedudukan Status Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu bagi Pekerja yang Tidak Memiliki Kontrak Kerja Tertulis (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3K/PDT.SUS-PHI/2025) Rizki, Muhamad Abdul Jamil; Gunadi, Ariawan
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): October
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.51170

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan hukum Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) yang tidak dibuat dalam bentuk tertulis sebagaimana diatur dalam perundang-undangan ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Ketiadaan kontrak tertulis menimbulkan persoalan mengenai keabsahan PKWT dan status hubungan kerja antara pekerja dan pemberi kerja. Melalui metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual, penelitian ini mengkaji Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3K/PDT.SUS-PHI/2025. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PKWT yang tidak dibuat secara tertulis tidak memenuhi syarat formal sehingga hubungan kerja berubahipso juremenjadi Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tidak Tertentu (PKWTT). Putusan Mahkamah Agung tersebut memperkuat perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja serta memberikan kepastian hukum dalam praktik ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Normatif Pekerja PKWTT Pasca PHK Akibat Perubahan Kondisi Usaha Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Indonesia Kamil, Renita; Gunadi, Ariawan
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): October
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.51141

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji secara mendalam perlindungan hukum terhadap hak normatif pekerja dengan status Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tidak Tertentu (PKWTT) yang mengalami Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK) akibat perubahan kondisi usaha. Dalam praktik ketenagakerjaan, perubahan kondisi usaha sering dijadikan dasar oleh perusahaan untuk melakukan rasionalisasi tenaga kerja, namun pelaksanaannya kerap menimbulkan persoalan karena tidak jarang hak-hak dasar pekerja terabaikan. Situasi ini menunjukkan adanya ketegangan antara kepentingan pengusaha dalam menjaga keberlanjutan usaha dan kewajiban negara untuk menjamin terpenuhinya hak-hak normatif pekerja sesuai amanat konstitusi dan peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan menelaah berbagai instrumen hukum positif, antara lain Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan, peraturan pelaksana, doktrin para ahli, serta putusan pengadilan yang relevan. Melalui pendekatan ini, penelitian berupaya mengidentifikasi batasan yuridis PHK berdasarkan perubahan kondisi usaha serta menilai sejauh mana mekanisme perlindungan normatif dapat memberikan kepastian dan keadilan bagi pekerja. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PHK hanya dapat dibenarkan apabila dilakukan melalui prosedur yang sah, disertai pemberian kompensasi yang memenuhi standar minimum, dan tetap memperhatikan asas proporsionalitas serta keseimbangan dalam hubungan kerja. Apabila pengusaha melakukan PHK tanpa memenuhi syarat-syarat tersebut, tindakan tersebut berpotensi bertentangan dengan hukum positif dan dapat menimbulkan akibat hukum berupa kewajiban pemenuhan hak yang belum diberikan atau pembatalan PHK oleh lembaga penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial. Dengan demikian, keberadaan perlindungan hukum terhadap hak normatif pekerja PKWTT menjadi instrumen penting untuk menjaga hubungan industrial yang adil sekaligus memastikan pekerja memperoleh kepastian dalam menghadapi perubahan kondisi usaha.
Penggunaan Doktrin Business Judgement Rule dalam Hukum Perusahaan di Indonesia Graciella, Eunike; Gunadi, Ariawan
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): October
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.51022

Abstract

Doktrin Business Judgement Rule menjadi penting karena memberikan ruang perlindungan hukum bagi direksi yang mengambil keputusan bisnis berdasarkan itikad baik, pertimbangan yang rasional, serta bebas dari konflik kepentingan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menelaah bagaimana prinsip tersebut diterapkan dalam praktik hukum perusahaan di Indonesia serta menilai kebutuhan pembaharuan pengaturannya, baik pada korporasi swasta maupun Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi putusan, melalui analisis terhadap ketentuan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas, Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 mengenai perubahan regulasi BUMN, serta beberapa putusan Mahkamah Agung yang relevan. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa prinsip BJR sesungguhnya telah tercermin secara implisit dalam Pasal 97 ayat (5) UUPT, meskipun penerapannya belum seragam akibat perbedaan penafsiran aparat penegak hukum terhadap unsur good faith dan due care. Oleh karena itu diperlukan aturan pelaksana yang lebih tegas untuk memastikan adanya parameter perlindungan yang konsisten bagi direksi, sehingga keputusan bisnis yang wajar tidak berubah menjadi dasar kriminalisasi. Penguatan penerapan BJR secara proporsional diyakini berpotensi mendorong tata kelola perusahaan yang lebih akuntabel, meningkatkan keberanian manajerial dalam pengambilan risiko yang terukur, serta menciptakan iklim usaha dan investasi yang lebih sehat di Indonesia.
The Effectiveness of Regulating Pre-Existing Conditions in Life Insurance Policies as a Risk-Mitigation Mechanism for Insurance Companies in Indonesia: Efektivitas Pengaturan Pre-Existing Condition dalam Polis Asuransi Jiwa Sebagai Mekanisme Mitigasi Risiko Perusahaan Asuransi di Indonesia Awuy, Euginia Nataniela; Gunadi, Ariawan
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v21i1.1408

Abstract

Background: Life insurance plays a crucial role in balancing financial protection and risk management, where pre-existing condition clauses function to maintain fairness between premium payments and actual risks borne by insurers. Specific Background: In Indonesia, the implementation of these clauses often triggers disputes due to inconsistent interpretations, lack of regulatory standardization, and low public literacy regarding insurance contracts. Knowledge Gap: Despite their importance, limited studies examine how effectively these clauses mitigate risk while maintaining legal certainty amid regulatory ambiguity and practical challenges in underwriting and proof. Aim: This study evaluates the effectiveness of pre-existing condition clauses as a risk-mitigation mechanism for Indonesian life insurance companies. Results: Findings show that these clauses prevent adverse selection, strengthen utmost good faith, and support accurate underwriting, though effectiveness is hindered by unclear definitions, uneven documentation, agent miscommunication, and difficulties in proving prior illnesses. Novelty: This research integrates legal, technical, and consumer-protection perspectives to identify systemic weaknesses that reduce clause enforceability. Implications: Strengthening regulatory standards, improving transparency, and enhancing underwriting systems are essential to reduce disputes and reinforce legal certainty in life insurance governance. Highlights: Evaluates how pre-existing condition clauses function as a core risk-mitigation tool in Indonesian life insurance. Highlights legal and practical challenges, including regulatory gaps, proof difficulties, and low insurance literacy. Recommends strengthening regulation, transparency, and underwriting systems to reduce disputes and enhance legal certainty. Keywords: Pre-Existing Condition, Life Insurance, Risk Mitigation, Legal Certainty, Underwriting
Private Sector and the 1% Disability Quota: Legal Responsibilities in Indonesia Agustin, Dila Wahyu; Gunadi, Ariawan
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.362

Abstract

The background of this research is the challenge of fulfilling the 1% disability employment quota by private companies in Indonesia, in accordance with Law No. 8 of 2016 on Persons with Disabilities. Despite the regulations outlining this obligation, companies often face obstacles such as low legal awareness, social stigma, and a lack of disability-friendly infrastructure. This study employs a juridical-normative research method with statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches to relevant regulations and their implementation practices. The findings show that although the government has made efforts to encourage companies to meet the disability quota through incentives and sanctions, consistent implementation remains limited. Strengthening oversight and increasing legal awareness are necessary to address these challenges. Additionally, applicable solutions include improving accessibility facilities and providing training programs for companies to better address the challenges of disability inclusion.
Issuer Compliance with Disclosure Principles in Insider Trading in the Indonesian Capital Market: A Comparative Study with Singapore and the United States from an Investor Protection Perspective: Kepatuhan Emiten Terhadap Prinsip Disclosure dalam Insider Trading di Pasar Modal Indonesia Perbandingan dengan Singapura dan Amerika Serikat: Perspektif Perlindungan Investor Joeliant, Hanz Bryan; Gunadi, Ariawan
Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1095

Abstract

General Background: Insider trading and weak information disclosure undermine market integrity and investor protection. Specific Background: In Indonesia, disclosure obligations under the Capital Market Law, OJK regulations, and IDX rules remain limited in timeliness, insider categorization, and enforcement compared to Singapore and the United States. Knowledge Gap: Existing studies have not systematically compared issuer compliance with disclosure principles across these jurisdictions to assess their effectiveness in preventing insider trading. Aims: This study analyzes Indonesia’s disclosure framework, compares it with Singapore and the U.S., and evaluates necessary reforms to enhance investor protection. Results: Findings show Indonesia’s two-day disclosure window, narrow insider definition, and predominantly administrative sanctions weaken deterrence, while Singapore’s immediate disclosure model and the U.S.’s broad misappropriation theory, real-time surveillance, and strong enforcement provide higher compliance and detection levels. Novelty: This research integrates doctrinal, conceptual, and comparative analyses to demonstrate how adopting broader insider definitions, accelerated disclosure, and technology-driven monitoring can strengthen Indonesia’s regulatory structure. Implications: Strengthening OJK–IDX integration, enhancing surveillance capacity, reforming insider trading provisions, and adopting international best practices are essential to improving market transparency and long-term investor confidence. Highlights: Indonesia’s disclosure rules remain slower and less comprehensive than Singapore and the U.S. Broader insider definitions and real-time surveillance improve detection and deterrence. Strengthened OJK–IDX integration is essential for effective enforcement and investor protection. Keywords: Insider Trading, Disclosure, Investor Protection, Capital Market Regulation, Comparative Study
A Comparative Study on Legal Protection for Consumers Using Digital Lending Services in Indonesia and Singapore from the Perspective of Legal Development Theory: Perbandingan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen Pengguna Layanan Pendanaan Digital antara Indonesia dan Singapura dalam Perspektif Teori Pembangunan Hukum Febrianto, Rizky; Gunadi, Ariawan
Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1096

Abstract

General Background: The rapid expansion of digital lending in Indonesia and Singapore reflects a broader transformation in financial technology that demands stronger regulatory safeguards. Specific Background: Despite regulatory efforts, Indonesia continues to face challenges of weak supervision, low industry compliance, and high exposure to illegal platforms, whereas Singapore has established a more structured and integrated regulatory model. Knowledge Gap: Comparative analyses examining both countries’ legal frameworks through the lens of Legal Development Theory remain limited, particularly regarding their effectiveness in ensuring consumer protection. Aims: This study analyzes and compares the legal protection mechanisms governing digital lending in Indonesia and Singapore while assessing their alignment with legal development principles. Results: Findings show Indonesia relies on POJK 40/2024, Consumer Protection Law, and Personal Data Protection Law, yet enforcement remains inconsistent; in contrast, Singapore’s Payment Services Act, CPFTA, PDPA, and MAS compliance-based supervision ensure stronger preventive regulation and more efficient dispute resolution. Novelty: This research integrates comparative regulatory analysis with Legal Development Theory to reveal differing developmental orientations of both jurisdictions. Implications: Strengthening supervisory capacity and enforcement is essential for Indonesia to build a safer, equitable, and innovation-supportive digital lending ecosystem. Highlights: Strong contrast exists between Indonesia’s fragmented enforcement and Singapore’s integrated MAS-led regulatory model. Singapore emphasizes preventive, risk-based oversight, while Indonesia remains largely reactive to emerging problems. Effective consumer protection hinges not only on regulation completeness but also on consistent supervision and institutional capacity. Keywords: Digital Lending, Consumer Protection, Fintech Regulation, Legal Development Theory, Comparative Law
Legal Liability for Violations of Outsourced Workers’ Rights in Indonesia from the Perspective of Comparative Joint Liability Principles in Spain and the Philippines: Pertanggungjawaban Hukum atas Pelanggaran Hak Pekerja Outsourcing di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Perbandingan Prinsip Joint Liability di Spanyol dan Filipina Christina, Nadya; Gunadi, Ariawan
Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1097

Abstract

General Background: The widespread adoption of outsourcing in Indonesia aims to enhance corporate flexibility and efficiency. Specific Background: Despite comprehensive regulation under UU 13/2003, UU 6/2023, and PP 35/2021, outsourced workers frequently experience violations of fundamental rights due to unclear allocation of legal responsibilities between outsourcing providers and user companies. Knowledge Gap: Existing Indonesian regulations place full liability solely on outsourcing companies, leaving limited legal remedies when providers fail to fulfil obligations, unlike countries applying joint liability. Aims: This study analyzes Indonesia’s legal framework on outsourced workers’ rights and compares it with the joint liability principles adopted in Spain and the Philippines. Results: Findings indicate that Indonesia’s system creates structural protection gaps, while Spain and the Philippines impose solidary responsibility on both provider and user companies, ensuring stronger enforcement of wages, social security, and working conditions. Novelty: This research provides a comparative legal perspective demonstrating how joint liability can operate as an equitable mechanism for outsourced worker protection. Implications: Adoption of joint liability in Indonesia could enhance legal certainty, prevent responsibility evasion, and strengthen workers’ access to remedies, offering a policy alternative for future legislative reform. Highlights: Indonesia’s current framework places full responsibility on outsourcing providers, creating protection gaps. Spain and the Philippines strengthen worker rights through solidary (joint) liability between providers and user companies. Joint liability offers a viable reform option to enhance fairness and legal certainty for outsourced workers in Indonesia. Keywords: Outsourcing, Legal Liability, Joint Liability, Worker Protection, Comparative Labor Law
Co-Authors Agustin, Dila Wahyu Alberta, Alberta Alexander Arcelino Gunadi Amad Sudiro Ambarita, Dicki Candra Amrie Firmansyah Andre Kiemas Anthony Willyus Wongkar Antonius Ferry Bastian Aprilia, Indah Siti Aulia, Riska Awuy, Euginia Nataniela Ayu Puspita Sari Baehaqi Bianty, Thisia Bondan Cahyadi Budi Prana Prasetyo Calvita Candra, Marvin Carsnelly, Eileen Cendranita, Ivannia Chandra, Edwin Chandra, Yulius Charomain, Mochammad Imam Christina, Nadya Christopher David Nagaria Claudia, Zulian Clementino Moningka, Yosia Cornelia Alpha Daniel Daniel Darren Andreas Dave Chrysander Defilania, Oktri Dewi Rahma Dewi Wulandari Dharmasetya, Lani Ekaratri, Azkia Elysia Wilhelmina Rengkung Endison Ravlindo Evelyn Fahri, Achmad Febrianto, Rizky Ferdinandus Zulvacar, Nathanael Ezekiel Fionita, Jessica Frederick Septian Tuwan Fredrik Siregar, Aristoteles Gerhard Frisca Delicia, Nadya Frisca Frisca Grace Priskilla Suwanto Graciella, Eunike Gumintang, Galuh Gilang Hakim, M. Rizky Aulia Harjanto, Devy Yulyana Hasan, Laura Kurniadi Herman Joseph Hummerson, Laureen Aurora Ilyasa, Farhan Hamka Irma, Febriana Jennifer Jennifer Jessica Candakentjana Jessica Jessica Joeliant, Hanz Bryan Juan Davis Elhanan Kamil, Renita Kevin Veronica Halim Khanifa Fauziah Khantidevi Lukmadi, Fionna Khutub, Muhammad Kiemas, Andre Kurniawan, Cicelly Chiesa Lestari, Novianti Lina Kristie Yonathin Lisa Putri Utami Lukita, Hans Made Aubrey Josephine Angelina Mahardhika, Dutasena Mahieu, Feybiola Cecilia Makawowor, Chelsea The Marchel Thobie Maria Cecilia Nugroho Marshella Cenyvesta Martheo, Felicia Martono Martono Matheus, Juan Mayvians, Tidelstein Melani Harly Melvina Michelle Nathania Michelle Starla Ongko Michelle, Grace Bernadette Mingga, Britney Wilhelmina Berlian Mita, Ermita Ekalia Monica Blazinky Muhammad Abdurrohim Muhammad Awal Alishakur Muhammad Theo Rizki Putra Muzacky, Ahmad Nadhea Tungga Devi Naftalie, Livia Aurelia Nagaria, Christopher David Nugroho, Hizkia Ivan Oping, Timothy Farrel Pagrelia, Yuda Tri Panji Ramadhan Paramitha, Chintya Lie Pascal Amadeo Yapputro Pasyah, Rabbil Arya Petrosina Matauseja Huka, Christia Prasanti, Nandani Bayu Puspa Hartanto, Adinda Puspita, Lidya Putri, Amanda Fitriani Eka Putri, Amelia Natalie Putri, Destia Liana Putri, Pricilia Dwi Anggreni Putri, Qonita Rizqi Iffani Raymond Kusuma Reyza Julianda Mahabati Ricky Ricky Rimandita, Tiffani Rizki, Muhamad Abdul Jamil Rohaya, Nizla Salim, Gerardus Aldo Samudra, Muhammad Bima Samuel, Maria Gabriela Samuel, Yoel sari, nike kumala Shahan, Akbar Helmie Nur Shasmita, Sylvia Siswahyudianto Stephanie Patricia Prasetyo Suwinto Johan Sylvia, Sylvia Tanera, Lauren Teddy Francis Theresia Wijaya Tsabita, Nabilla Mahva Vanessa Widjaja Vianka, Maria Ibella Vina Octavia Vincent Vincent, Vincent Vivi Heniasy Wanibe, Kenji Dustin Wonohadidjojo, Christopher Howard Yanuar Putra Erwin Yolanda, Maureen Keisha Yudha, Ivan Tirta