p-Index From 2020 - 2025
9.027
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS) International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Proyeksi: Jurnal Psikologi Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter Psikologika : Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Psikologi Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam Psikoislamika : Jurnal Psikologi dan Psikologi Islam El-HARAKAH : Jurnal Budaya Islam El-QUDWAH Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) JIPSINDO (Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Indonesia) Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar EDUKASIA Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Konseling Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial, dan Sains Intizar JIP (Jurnal Intervensi Psikologi) Abjadia, International Journal of Education Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dasar Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam JURNAL PENELITIAN Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I) INSAN Jurnal Psikologi dan Kesehatan Mental E-Dimas: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat MEDIAPSI Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Palapa: Jurnal Study Keislaman dan Ilmu Pendidikan Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling IRJE (Indonesian Research Journal in Education) Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran At-Ta'dib: Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Pendidikan Agama Islam al-Iltizam: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation International Journal of Elementary Education Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL OF EDUCATION (RDJE) AS-SABIQUN: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini Jurnal Penelitian International Journal of Islamic Educational Psychology INSPIRA: Indonesian Journal of Psychological Research Edu Consilium : Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Pendidikan Islam Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Psychology Edukasiana: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Journal of Indonesian Psychological Science (JIPS) Unisia Jurnal Tatsqif JIP (Jurnal Intervensi Psikologi) Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Indonesian Psychological Science (JIPS)

Pengembangan Perangkat Asesmen Mata Kuliah Psikologi Pendidikan Menggunakan Software Anates Dessy Rif'a Anzani; Achmad Kholif Rosyidi; Rahmat Aziz; Iqbal Ali Wafa; Ilham A.E. Zaeni
Journal of Indonesian Psychological Science (JIPS) Vol 1, No 01 (2021): The first Publication
Publisher : UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/jips.v1i01.14925

Abstract

AbstrakEvaluasi hasil belajar siswa merupakan usaha yang perlu dilaksanakan oleh seorang pendidik. Dalam rangka mengukur ketercapaian tujuan yang telah ditetapkan. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk asesmen pada mata kuliah Psikologi Pendidikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti tentang bagaimanakah daya beda, tingkat kesukaran, dan kualitas butir soal mata kuliah Psikologi Pendidikan di UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. Soal dalam asesmen disusun berdasarkan 4 tema dalam materi ini dan dikembangkan menjadi 24 butir soal. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Jurusan Psikologi UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim dengan mengikutsertakan 23 mahasiswa. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dengan cara memberikan interpretasi deskriptif atas data kualitatif yang ada. Soal yang telah dibuat akan dilakukan analisa yang meliputi reliabilitas soal, daya beda soal, derajat kesukaran, korelasi skor item terhadap skor total, dan kualitas pengecoh. Berdasarkan hasil analisa, didapati bahwa soal yang telah dibuat dapat digunakan lagi. Beberapa perubahan masih diperlukan, seperti penggantian soal dengan daya pembeda rendah. Kualitas pengecoh pada pilihan jawaban harus ditingkatkan agar pertanyaan menjadi lebih berkualitas. Soal-soal tersebut memiliki tingkat kesulitan yang lumayan. Soal dibagi secara merata dalam kompleksitas, mulai dari yang sangat sulit hingga yang sangat mudah. Kata kunci: Asesmen, Psikologi Pendidikan, Anates Abstract Evaluation of student learning outcomes is an effort that needs to be carried out by an educator. In order to measure the achievement of the goals that have been set. This research was conducted for assessment in Educational Psychology course. This study aims to examine how the differentiating power, level of difficulty, and quality of items in the Educational Psychology course at UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang are. The questions in the assessment are arranged based on 4 themes in this material and developed into 24 items. This research was conducted at the Department of Psychology UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim by involving 23 students. This research was conducted by providing a descriptive interpretation of the existing qualitative data. The questions that have been made will be analyzed which includes the reliability of the questions, the differentiating power of the questions, the degree of difficulty, the correlation of the item scores to the total score, and the quality of distractors. Based on the results of the analysis, it was found that the questions that have been made can be used again. Some changes are still needed, such as the replacement of questions with low discriminating power. The quality of the distractors in the answer choices must be improved so that the questions are of higher quality. These questions have a decent level of difficulty. Problems are evenly divided in complexity, ranging from very difficult to very easy. Keywords: Assessment, Educational Psychology, Anates
Analisis butir soal ujian akhir semester mata kuliah psikologi belajar menggunakan software anates Sakinah Azzahroh; Fajar Lilia Iman; Badiul Anwar; Rahmat Aziz
Journal of Indonesian Psychological Science (JIPS) Vol 2, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/jips.v3i2.17228

Abstract

The Final Examination is conducted to test students' understanding of the lecture material that has been taken. The questions given must have a quality so that they can measure learning outcomes appropriately. The purpose of this study was to determine the quality of UAS questions for the Student Learning Psychology subject at X University. This research uses a quantitative descriptive method. Item analysis based on validity, reliability, discriminating power, level of difficulty, and effectiveness of the distractor. The questions consist of 3 types; multiple choice, true-false, and essay. Data collection techniques used the questionnaire method and the results of the data were analyzed using Anates ver.4 software, and Microsoft Excel. The results of the analysis stated that the test questions for the Learning Psychology subject were of good quality. The true-false questions obtained test reliability results of 0.41 and the multiple choice questions obtained 0.46 indicating that the questions had moderate reliability. Distinguishing power of true-false questions has a percentage of 12.50% to 68.75%, multiple choice questions 18.75% to 62.50% and essay questions 15.63% to 29.63% which means the questions have different power ranging from bad to very good. The difficulty level of true and false questions obtained a percentage of 51.67% to 95%, multiple choice questions 33% to 81%, and essay questions 33% to 55% indicating that there were no difficult questions. The effectiveness of the distractor on multiple choice questions 30% has the effectiveness of the less good distractor, 10% which is included in the effectiveness of the good distractor is 50%. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of the deception is very good, 10%. Ujian Akhir Semester dilakukan untuk menguji pemahaman mahasiswa terkait materi perkuliahan yang telah ditempuh. Soal yang diberikan harus memiliki kualitas yang suapaya dapat mengukur hasil belajar dengan tepat. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui kualitas soal UAS mata kuliah Psikologi Belajar Mahasiswa Universitas X. Adapun penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kuantitatif. Analisis soal berdasarkan validitas, reliabilitas, daya pembeda, tingkat kesukaran, dan efektivitas pengecoh. Soal terdiri dari 3 tipe; pilihan ganda, benar-salah, dan essay. Tehnik pengumpulan data menggunakan metode kuisioner dan hasil data dianalisis menggunakan software Anates ver.4, dan Microsoft Excel. Hasil dari analisis menyatakan bahwa soal UAS mata kuliah Psikologi Belajar merupakan soal yang berkualitas baik. Soal benar-salah memperoleh hasil reliabilitas tes sebesar 0.41 dan soal pilihan ganda memperoleh angka 0.46 menunjukkan bahwa soal memiiki reliabilitas yang sedang. Daya beda soal benar-salah memiliki persentase 12.50% sampai 68.75% , soal pilihan ganda 18.75% sampai 62.50% dan soal essay 15,63% sampai 29.63%yang berarti soal memiliki daya beda yang beragam mulai jelek hingga baik sekali. Tingkat kesukaran soal benar salah memperoleh persentase  51.67 %  sampai 95% , soal pilihan ganda 33% sampai 81%, dan soal essay 33% sampai 55% menunjukan tidak ada soal yang sukar. Efektifitas pengecoh pada soal pilihan ganda 30% memiliki efektivitas pengecoh kurang baik, 10% yang termasuk dalam efektivitas pengecoh baik adalah 50%. Sedangkan soal efektivitas pengecohnya sangat baik 10%.
Pengembangan Perangkat Asesmen Mata Kuliah Psikologi Pendidikan Menggunakan Software Anates Anzani, Dessy Rif'a; Rosyidi, Achmad Kholif; Aziz, Rahmat; Wafa, Iqbal Ali; Zaeni, Ilham A.E.
Journal of Indonesian Psychological Science (JIPS) Vol 1, No 01 (2021): Journal of Indonesian Psychological Science (JIPS)
Publisher : UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/jips.v1i01.14925

Abstract

AbstrakEvaluasi hasil belajar siswa merupakan usaha yang perlu dilaksanakan oleh seorang pendidik. Dalam rangka mengukur ketercapaian tujuan yang telah ditetapkan. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk asesmen pada mata kuliah Psikologi Pendidikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti tentang bagaimanakah daya beda, tingkat kesukaran, dan kualitas butir soal mata kuliah Psikologi Pendidikan di UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. Soal dalam asesmen disusun berdasarkan 4 tema dalam materi ini dan dikembangkan menjadi 24 butir soal. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Jurusan Psikologi UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim dengan mengikutsertakan 23 mahasiswa. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dengan cara memberikan interpretasi deskriptif atas data kualitatif yang ada. Soal yang telah dibuat akan dilakukan analisa yang meliputi reliabilitas soal, daya beda soal, derajat kesukaran, korelasi skor item terhadap skor total, dan kualitas pengecoh. Berdasarkan hasil analisa, didapati bahwa soal yang telah dibuat dapat digunakan lagi. Beberapa perubahan masih diperlukan, seperti penggantian soal dengan daya pembeda rendah. Kualitas pengecoh pada pilihan jawaban harus ditingkatkan agar pertanyaan menjadi lebih berkualitas. Soal-soal tersebut memiliki tingkat kesulitan yang lumayan. Soal dibagi secara merata dalam kompleksitas, mulai dari yang sangat sulit hingga yang sangat mudah. Kata kunci: Asesmen, Psikologi Pendidikan, Anates Abstract Evaluation of student learning outcomes is an effort that needs to be carried out by an educator. In order to measure the achievement of the goals that have been set. This research was conducted for assessment in Educational Psychology course. This study aims to examine how the differentiating power, level of difficulty, and quality of items in the Educational Psychology course at UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang are. The questions in the assessment are arranged based on 4 themes in this material and developed into 24 items. This research was conducted at the Department of Psychology UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim by involving 23 students. This research was conducted by providing a descriptive interpretation of the existing qualitative data. The questions that have been made will be analyzed which includes the reliability of the questions, the differentiating power of the questions, the degree of difficulty, the correlation of the item scores to the total score, and the quality of distractors. Based on the results of the analysis, it was found that the questions that have been made can be used again. Some changes are still needed, such as the replacement of questions with low discriminating power. The quality of the distractors in the answer choices must be improved so that the questions are of higher quality. These questions have a decent level of difficulty. Problems are evenly divided in complexity, ranging from very difficult to very easy. Keywords: Assessment, Educational Psychology, Anates
Analisis butir soal ujian akhir semester mata kuliah psikologi belajar menggunakan software anates Azzahroh, Sakinah; Iman, Fajar Lilia; Anwar, Badiul; Aziz, Rahmat
Journal of Indonesian Psychological Science (JIPS) Vol 2, No 2 (2022): Journal of Indonesian Psychological Science (JIPS)
Publisher : UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/jips.v3i2.17228

Abstract

The Final Examination is conducted to test students' understanding of the lecture material that has been taken. The questions given must have a quality so that they can measure learning outcomes appropriately. The purpose of this study was to determine the quality of UAS questions for the Student Learning Psychology subject at X University. This research uses a quantitative descriptive method. Item analysis based on validity, reliability, discriminating power, level of difficulty, and effectiveness of the distractor. The questions consist of 3 types; multiple choice, true-false, and essay. Data collection techniques used the questionnaire method and the results of the data were analyzed using Anates ver.4 software, and Microsoft Excel. The results of the analysis stated that the test questions for the Learning Psychology subject were of good quality. The true-false questions obtained test reliability results of 0.41 and the multiple choice questions obtained 0.46 indicating that the questions had moderate reliability. Distinguishing power of true-false questions has a percentage of 12.50% to 68.75%, multiple choice questions 18.75% to 62.50% and essay questions 15.63% to 29.63% which means the questions have different power ranging from bad to very good. The difficulty level of true and false questions obtained a percentage of 51.67% to 95%, multiple choice questions 33% to 81%, and essay questions 33% to 55% indicating that there were no difficult questions. The effectiveness of the distractor on multiple choice questions 30% has the effectiveness of the less good distractor, 10% which is included in the effectiveness of the good distractor is 50%. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of the deception is very good, 10%. Ujian Akhir Semester dilakukan untuk menguji pemahaman mahasiswa terkait materi perkuliahan yang telah ditempuh. Soal yang diberikan harus memiliki kualitas yang suapaya dapat mengukur hasil belajar dengan tepat. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui kualitas soal UAS mata kuliah Psikologi Belajar Mahasiswa Universitas X. Adapun penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kuantitatif. Analisis soal berdasarkan validitas, reliabilitas, daya pembeda, tingkat kesukaran, dan efektivitas pengecoh. Soal terdiri dari 3 tipe; pilihan ganda, benar-salah, dan essay. Tehnik pengumpulan data menggunakan metode kuisioner dan hasil data dianalisis menggunakan software Anates ver.4, dan Microsoft Excel. Hasil dari analisis menyatakan bahwa soal UAS mata kuliah Psikologi Belajar merupakan soal yang berkualitas baik. Soal benar-salah memperoleh hasil reliabilitas tes sebesar 0.41 dan soal pilihan ganda memperoleh angka 0.46 menunjukkan bahwa soal memiiki reliabilitas yang sedang. Daya beda soal benar-salah memiliki persentase 12.50% sampai 68.75% , soal pilihan ganda 18.75% sampai 62.50% dan soal essay 15,63% sampai 29.63%yang berarti soal memiliki daya beda yang beragam mulai jelek hingga baik sekali. Tingkat kesukaran soal benar salah memperoleh persentase  51.67 %  sampai 95% , soal pilihan ganda 33% sampai 81%, dan soal essay 33% sampai 55% menunjukan tidak ada soal yang sukar. Efektifitas pengecoh pada soal pilihan ganda 30% memiliki efektivitas pengecoh kurang baik, 10% yang termasuk dalam efektivitas pengecoh baik adalah 50%. Sedangkan soal efektivitas pengecohnya sangat baik 10%. Copyright ©2022. The Authors. Published by Journal of Indonesian Psychological Science (JIPS). This is an open access article under the CC BY NO SA. link: Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International — CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Co-Authors -, Zamroni - Abdul Hamid Achmad Ainur Ridlo Achmad Kholif Rosyidi Adam Anshori Adip Fanani Afiful Aziz Agus Maimun Ahamed, Forbis Ahmad Fatah Yasin Alfiana Yuli Efiyanti Ali Maksum Alribdi, Nada Ibrahim Aminul, M. Rifqi Anwar, Badiul Anzani, Dessy Rif'a Arna Saskia Azizah, Dewi Maulana Azzahroh, Sakinah Badiul Anwar Baharuddin Baharuddin Dedi Saputra Dessy Rif'a Anzani Dewi Ratnasari Diana, Raden Rachmy Dilapanga, Raihan Retriansyah Djoko Susanto Elok Halimatus Sa’diyah Endah Kurniawati P Faiqotul Himmah Fajar Lilia Iman Fanani, Adip Fanani, Muhammad Adip Farid, Faisol Fathul Lubabin Nuqul Fatmawati, Fatmawati Fifin Afriana Farindi Astutik Fitrah Ainul Mawaddah Forbis Ahamed Fuad Nashori Gunawan, Himan Muttaqin Hady, M. Samsul Haj, Habil Syahril Hani'ah, Wardatul Hanifah, Nor Iffat Maimunah Iin Tri Rahayu Ilham A.E. Zaeni Iman, Fajar Lilia Indah Aminatuz Zuhriyah Infanti Wisnu Wardani Iqbal Ali Wafa Irwan Irwan Lestari, Sumia Lina Izza Mazida M. Mujab M. Samsul Hadi Magfiroh, Norma Hasanatul Mahbuubah, Nabiilatul Maimunah, Iffat Manasikan, Mega Arina Mashito, Dewi Masturin Masturin Masturin Masturin Maulani, Iqbal Azam Mega Arina Manasikan Meinarni Susilowati Miftahul Huda Miftahus Surur Miftahus Surur, Miftahus Moh. Anik Mustofa Mohamad Fahri Salam Mohamad Zubad Nurul Yaqin Mohammad Mahpur Muallifah, Muallifah Muarofah, Ulfiatul - Muhammad Adip Fanani Muhammad Amin Nur Muhammad Amin Nur, Muhammad Amin Muhammad Hilal Maulidi Muhammad Samsul Hadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Munjiah, Munjiah Mustofa, Mohammad Hasan Muzaqi, Muhammad Burhanudin Nafa, Isna Farihatul Husna Ngainun Naim Ngainun Naim Novezry, Ai Rinda nur Hasib Muhammad Nur Khasanah Nur Wahyuni, Esa Nurma Millatina Nurul Mahruzah Yulia Purwaningtyas, Endah Kurniawati Qudzy, Saifuddin Zuhri Raihan Retriansyah Dilapanga Retno Mangestuti Risma Ana Wahdati Rosyidi, Achmad Kholif Rubaidi Sabilla Irwina Safitri Sakinah Azzahroh Samsul Susilawati SANDI KURNIAWAN Saputri D, Leonita Ikasari Saskia, Arna Septi Ayu Lestari Sidik, Nur Ahmad Hardoyo Siswoyo, Selina Rahmawati Subandi Subandi Sumia Lestari Sunnah Ida Syarofah, Syarofah Thomas Wijaya Tiwi Putria Yosnela Trimansyah, Trimansyah Ulfiatul - Muarofah Ullrich Guenther Wafa, Iqbal Ali Wahyu Hengki Irawan Wahyuni, Esa Nur Wildana Wargadinata Yulia Sholichatun Yuliati Holifah Zaeni, Ilham A.E. Zaenuddin Hudi Prasojo