Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
14.539
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUSTISI Al Qisthas : Jurnal Hukum dan Politik COJ (Coastal and Ocean Journal) International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Jurnal Hukum Legalita Journal of Social And Economics Research Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Dan Filsafat Cendekia: Journal of Law, Social and Humanities Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Jurnal Relasi Publik Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Aladalah: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Nusantara Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Jurnal Wilayah, Kota dan Lingkungan Berkelanjutan Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan MERDEKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Amerta Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Referendum International Journal of Law and Society Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice International Journal of Sociology and Law Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum Dan Administrasi Publik International Journal of Social Science and Humanity Desentralisasi: Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, Dan Pemerintahan Pemuliaan Keadilan Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi journal of social and economic research Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal IPSSJ J-CEKI
Irwan Triadi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 123 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal

 1 
EFFORTS TO RECOVER ASSETS FROM CORRUPTION CRIMES THROUGH OPTIMIZATION OF LEGISLATION IN INDONESIA AND A REVIEW OF THE DRAFT LAW ON ASSET FORFEITURE Irwan Triadi; Bayu Giri Atmojo
Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 3 No. 1 Edisi Januari 2026
Publisher : PT. Jurnal Center Indonesia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62567/micjo.v3i1.1609

Abstract

Corruption, as an organized and transnational crime, demands a more effective asset recovery mechanism than the conventional criminal approach currently applied in Indonesia. The limitations of criminal law instruments in tracing, confiscating, and repatriating assets that have been transferred, concealed, or placed outside national jurisdiction form the central background for the urgency of the Asset Forfeiture Bill. This study aims to analyze the concept of asset forfeiture for corruption cases through the non-conviction based forfeiture mechanism and assess the alignment of the Asset Forfeiture Bill with international standards, particularly the UNCAC. The research employs a normative legal method through an examination of legislation, academic literature, international documents, and comparative best practices. The findings indicate that the Bill introduces a new enforcement paradigm through in rem procedures, an integrated asset-tracing system, civil judicial control, and transparent asset management. The discussion reveals that although the Bill has significant potential to enhance state asset recovery, its implementation requires strengthened evidentiary standards, protection of property rights, and improved inter-agency coordination. The study concludes that the Asset Forfeiture Bill represents a strategic instrument for improving the effectiveness of anti-corruption efforts, yet its success depends on procedural safeguards, transparency in asset administration, and the institutional capacity of law enforcement bodies.
LEGAL DISCOVERY BY JUDGES IN ADDRESSING THE AMBIGUITY OF “DEALER” AND “USER” ELEMENTS IN ARTICLES 114, 112, AND 127 OF THE NARCOTICS LAW Irwan Triadi; Dhikma Heradika; Abelmart Sihombing; Bayu Giri Atmojo
Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 3 No. 1 Edisi Januari 2026
Publisher : PT. Jurnal Center Indonesia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62567/micjo.v3i1.1638

Abstract

The ambiguity of the elements “dealer” and “user” in Articles 114, 112, and 127 of Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics creates legal uncertainty in the practice of criminal justice. These three provisions often overlap in law enforcement, particularly when investigators and public prosecutors apply more severe charges without comprehensively examining the legal construction of the defendant’s actions, including the social and situational context behind them. This study is a normative legal research that examines the doctrine of judicial legal discovery, principles of criminal law, and the principle of proportionality in sentencing in a more in-depth and structured manner. The results of the study indicate that judges have the authority to interpret the elements of narcotics criminal acts systematically, grammatically, and teleologically to clearly distinguish between “abusive users” and “dealers with the intent to distribute.” Legal discovery is needed to prevent overcriminalization and to ensure the protection of the rights of suspects and defendants throughout the entire criminal justice process. This study concludes that the appropriate method of interpretation is an integration of systematic interpretation, teleological interpretation, and the ratio legis of the Narcotics Law.
THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY IN THE DYNAMICS OF CRIMINAL LAW INTERPRETATION: A NORMATIVE STUDY ON THE LIMITS OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITY Irwan Triadi; Dhikma Heradika
Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 3 No. 1 Edisi Januari 2026
Publisher : PT. Jurnal Center Indonesia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62567/micjo.v3i1.1654

Abstract

The principle of legality is a fundamental concept in the Indonesian criminal justice system, ensuring legal certainty and the protection of human rights from arbitrary criminal punishment. However, the rapid development of modern crimes often leads to legal gaps or vague norms that require judges to conduct judicial law-finding (rechtsvinding) when resolving criminal cases. This research aims to analyze the position of the principle of legality as a legal limit to judicial authority and examine how far judicial law-finding can be carried out without violating the essential principles of criminal law. This study employs a normative legal research method with a statute approach, conceptual approach, case approach, and historical approach. The results demonstrate that the principle of legality plays a crucial role in restricting judicial interpretation to prevent the creation of new offenses that may harm defendants and to ensure punishment can only be imposed based on pre-existing laws. Nonetheless, judicial law-finding remains necessary to address contemporary crimes that are not yet regulated under statutory law. Therefore, a proportional balance between legal certainty and substantive justice is required so that the principle of legality and judicial law-finding can work synergistically within Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
Co-Authors Abdil Azizul Furqon Abelmart Sihombing Achmed Sukendro Adiatma Nugroho Adinda Kusumaning Ratri Aditama Candra Kusuma Adnan Hasanudin Adnan Madjid Adnasohn Aqilla Respati Afandono Cahyo Putranto Agil Masyhur Akbar Ahmad Haris Junaidi Akhfa Kamilla Sulaeman Albert S. Limbong Aldy Mirozul Alisya Rahma Saebani Amalina Hasyyati Andi Sabila Putri Andre Rizaldy Angel Evelyn Angelica Nathaniella Aprilian Nurahsan Aprilian Nurahsan Ismail Arfah Naila Rahmah Ariel Lois Arif Pujawangsa Paksi Aslihatin Zuliana Aura Nasya Madhani Harahap Azelia Rizki Sarwono Azizah Arfah Azizah Azizah Balqis Tsabitah Azzahrah Bayu Giri Atmojo Bayu Suryadi Manggala Bella Intan Feronica Benedictus Haryo Gona Perdana Bernard Sindak Pangihutan Lumban Siantar Brian Mochamad F. Christloy Totota Karo Karo Della, Ismarini Della Purnama Dhikma Heradika Dimas Yanuarsyah Ekko Harjanto Elvina Aretha Emaeve Nur Berliantari Eriz Syawaldi Erva Yunita Erviyanti Rosmaida Esi Anindya Azzahra EVI FITRIANI Exal Sinaga Fachri Hafizd Selian Fahri Erlangga Faiz Aulia Rahman FANDY GULTOM Fendy Oktavianto Frans Samuel Junero Butarbutar Gema Permana Rahman Ghifari Vioga Batubara Ghina Rhoudotul Jannah Giska Fajari Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Handoyo Prasetyo Happy Sturaya Quratuainniza Hendra Parulian Heru Yoga Pamungkas Ighna Ikrimah Ika Yanuar Ika Yanuar Margiyanti Indra Hendrawan Isma Isyana Isti Puspitasari Iswanti Rachmanisa Iwan Erar Joesoef Jaury Douglas Pardomuan Jimmi Dohar Pandapotan Khaila Aurellia Latisha, Najwa Ligina Tesalonika M. Adnan Madjid M. Reza Saputra Made Wipra Pratistita Maulida Fitriani mirozul, aldy Mohammad Haikal Rasyid Muhamad Afifullah Muhammad Anwar Ibrahim Muhammad Aryo Dwinanda Mukti Muhammad Bintang Firdaus Muhammad Damar Setyo Kumoro Muhammad Fahrudin Muhammad Rausyan Fikry Muhammad Yusuf Muda Azka Najwa Latisha Naue, Atiek Pratiwi Putri Nayara Dihati Nefrisa Adlina Maaruf Nirwasita Zada Paramesti Novaranty Zura Dwiputri Nurrachma Maharani Nurwidya Kusma Wardhani Osihanna Meita Kasih Paji Suwarno Pratistita, Made Wipra Pujo Widodo Putranto, Afandono Cahyo Putri Nabila Sahwahita Putri, Nabila Diara Raden Panji Rahmatullah Rafi Oktario Mahdi Rafqi Rafshanjani Dalimunthe Raka Haikal Rakhbir Singh Ramelan, Michael Sanrio Rania Adriane Desrina Ratu Wida Widyaningsih Suhandi Rayhan Syahbana Mahendra Raysha Aulia Fazila Retno Hariarti Retno Hariati Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution Risky Tara Nabita Sari Riyanto Riyanto Riyanto Riyanto Rofi Ayyasy Saskia Nursukma Saskia Nursukma Andriliani Satrio Wicaksono Adi Sefrina Linda Adilla Putri Slamet Tri Wahyudi Suryani Alawiyah Syabilal Ali Syahda Mauldiyani Talitha Aqiella Marsanthy Tasya Darosyifa Taufiqurrohman Syahuri Tirsa Putri Indira Tomi Khoyron Nasir Tri Bowo Hersandy Febrianto Tulus Mampetua Lumban Gaol Vedita Akbar Vinka Arzetta Fiana Witasya Aurelia Sulaiman Yemima Maharani Natassia Yohana Sekar Pawening Zahrah Rani'ah Delyananda