Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
47.554
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Pembaharuan Hukum Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Sociological Jurisprudence Journal KERTHA WICAKSANA Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Journal of Tourism Economics and Policy Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Jurnal Preferensi Hukum (JPH) Law Doctoral Community Service Journal Dharma Jnana Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Jurnal Abdi Dharma Masyarakat Community Services Journal (CSJ) Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Verdict: Journal of Law Science Jurnal Analogi Hukum Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum
Dewi, A.A Sagung Laksmi
Universitas Warmadewa
Religion Arts Humanities Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 314 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 314 Documents
Search

 22   23   24   25   26 
Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pihak yang Dirugikan atas Penggunaan Jalan Umum sebagai Tempat Parkir Pribadi Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; Komang Wahyu Darmayanta; I Made Minggu Widyantara
Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

People have the right to use public roads without interference from others who use public roads for private purposes. Vehicle owners usually use public roads as private parking lots. This study was conducted with the aim of describing how the responsibility of vehicle owners who use public roads as private parking lots and how the legal protection of parties who are harmed by the use of public roads as private parking lots. This study conducted research using a normative legal approach and legislative and conceptual studies. The findings of this study show that the level of liability of vehicle owners who use public spaces as a place to park private cars can vary depending on the legal regulations in force in a country. In Indonesia, there is a regulation number 22 of 2009 that regulates matters related to traffic and transportation on the road. Fines for parking violations are stipulated in Article 275 paragraph 1 of Law Number 22 Year 2009 on Road Traffic and Transportation (LLAJ Law). Parking on public roads is not permitted even if there are no no-parking signs posted. Roads are designed for the benefit of the general public and should not be used for the benefit of individuals.
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Tindak Pidana Kekerasan (Pengeroyokan) yang Menyebabkan Kematian Anak Agung Istri Nadia Maheswari Devi; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; I Made Minggu Widiantara
Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Crimes of violence (brawling) always exist in society, and tend to increase and develop in society in line with the times. The crime of violence (beating) is a criminal offense that relates to moral issues and feelings. Based on this, How is the legal regulation of the crime of violence (beating)? And how are the criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of beatings that cause death? This research uses normative legal research. Legal arrangements against criminal acts of violence (beating) which is a criminal act as regulated in Article 358 of the Criminal Code which provides a maximum imprisonment of two years and eight months and a maximum of two years. Criminal sanctions against perpetrators of beatings that cause death are regulated in Article 170 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code which will be sentenced to a maximum imprisonment of 5 years and 6 months, as well as other sanctions regarding beatings are also regulated in Article 358 of the Criminal Code.
Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Pelecehan Seksual Yang Menderita Fetishistic Disorderv (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 2286/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Sby) Kade Richa Mulyawati; Putu Ayu Candradiva Saraswati; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi
Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/jph.6.2.2025.153-159

Abstract

One form of behavioral deviation that has occurred in human life is fetishistic disorder. The formulation of the problem in this study are: How is the legal regulation of the perpetrators of sexual harassment in Indonesia? and How is the form of criminal liability for perpetrators of sexual harassment who suffer from fetishistic disorder case study of decision Number 2286/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Sby. This research uses a normative methodological approach that focuses on legal analysis and legislation, and utilizes a conceptual approach. The result of this research is that fetish behavior can only be classified as obscene acts if there are acts of coercion, kissing, or sexual touching of the victim and this can fulfill the elements of the article on violation of decency in the Criminal Code. The perpetrator was sentenced to imprisonment and a fine for disseminating personally intimidating electronic information. The government should immediately harmonize the laws and regulations governing the term sexual harassment in the Criminal Code in detail. This is very necessary in imposing appropriate criminal sanctions on the perpetrator.
Empowering Village Administrators in Preventing Disputes Through Basic Paralegal Training in Apuan Village, Susut District, Bangli Regency I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; A.A Sagung Laksmi Dewi; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma; I Wayan Sunarta; Ayu Prasetya Dewi; I Gusti Agung Ayu Candra Nigrat
Law Doctoral Community Service Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Law Doctoral Community Service Journal
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55637/ldcsj.2.2.7606.92-95

Abstract

Cases or disputes are common in both urban areas and rural areas. The existence of differences in interests causes disputes to occur both in the private sphere and in the public sphere. Likewise, in Apuan Village, small clashes often occur which sometimes cause disharmony in society. The importance of understanding community law and village officials will greatly help defuse and resolve disputes that arise in the community. The purpose of this research is to provide basic paralegal training to village officials to prevent disputes from occurring. The implementation method is by conducting interviews with the Apuan Village Government. This can happen due to the lack of public knowledge, especially the poor and marginal people about the law. Paralegal arrangements have been regulated in Law Number 16 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid and Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 3 of 2021 concerning Paralegals in Providing Legal Aid. very important socialized to the village level. As a follow-up step, it is necessary to provide basic paralegal knowledge for village officials as a protector of the community if there is a dispute in the community.
Model Pengelolaan Desa Wisata Berbasis Desa Adat di Desa Adat Kiadan-Pelaga-Badung- Bali (Pemerdayaan Masyarakat Adat Pada Desa Binaan Universitas Warmadewa di Bali) I Wayan Wesna Astara; A.A.Gde Oka Wisnumurti; I Nyoman Putu Budiartha; I Made Mardika; I Made Suniasta Amertha; I Ketut Irianto; A.A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi; Ida Ayu Putu Widiati; Luh Putu Suryani; Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati
Community Service Journal (CSJ) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/csj.1.2.2019.45-52

Abstract

Abstrak Desa Plaga kuhusnya desa adat Kiadan secara legal telah didesign untuk menjadi Desa Wisata. Hal ini tidak terlepas dari proses politik dan hukum untuk menjadikan desa Plaga sebagai desa Wisata. Dikeluarkannya Surat keputusan Bupati Badung, nomor 47 tahun 2010 tentang penetapan kawasan desa wisata di kabupaten Badung. Tujuan penetapan desa wisata untuk mencegah kesenjangan ekonomi wilayah Badung Selatan dengan Badung Utara. Dengan adanya Surat Keputusan Bupati tentang Desa Wisata untuk Badung Utara khususnya Desa adat Kiadan diharapkan Desa Adat mampu mengelola fotensi Desa Wisatanya berdasarkan kearifan local yang hidup di masyarakat adat Bali sesuai dengan asas desa mawa cara, negara mawa tata. Hampir 8 (delapan) tahun terbitnya Surat Keputusan Bupati tidak jelas model pengelolaaan Wisata Desa di Kiadan, karena masyarakat belum mengetahui tentang konsep desa Wisata, bagaimana mengelola desa wisata, dan bagaima memanfaatkan potensi sebagai sumber daya budaya untuk mengangkat citra desa wisata untuk kesejahtraan masyarakat adat. Untuk itu, perlu pendampingan aktor pariwisata lokal, penyuratan pengelolaan desa wisata melalui awig-awig desa adat.
Sanksi Malpraktik Dan Resiko Medik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Dokter A.A. Ngr. Dwi Dananjaya; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; Luh Putu Suryani
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.1.1.2019.6-10

Abstract

Abstract The existence of health law has a huge influence on national development, especially in the health sector. At this time there were so many medical crimes in the form of malpractice that happened to the community especially in the medical world, but so many people did not know between the difference between malpractice and medical risk. To find out whether what is done by medical personnel is malpractice or medical risk, therefore the authors are interested in conducting research in the form of a thesis under the title Malpractice and Medical Risk Sanctions Performed by Doctors. The research method used is a normative legal method. What can be determined by the difference between malpractice and medical risk is in the Medical Practice Law and the Medical Ethics Code is sanctions on malpractice doctors, namely medical malpractice, civil malpractice, and administrative malpractice including legal ethical violations. Malpractice is a deliberate and negligent action because it fulfills the element of error. But medical risk is not a criminal offense and includes medical accidents and accidents that have elements that cannot be predicted beforehand, cannot be prevented, and cannot be blamed. Keywords: Doctors; Malpractice sanctions; Medical Risk Abstrak Keberadaan hukum kesehatan membawa pengaruh yang sangat besar terhadap pembangunan bangsa, khususnya di bidang kesehatan. Pada masa ini begitu banyak kejahatan medis berupa tindak malpraktik yang terjadi pada masyarakat khususnya pada dunia kedokteran, akan tetapi begitu banyak masyarakat yang tidak mengetahui antara perbedaan malpraktik dan resiko medik. Untuk mengetahui apakah yang dilakukan oleh tenaga medis tersebut malpraktik atau resiko medik, maka dari itu penulis tertarik mengadakan penelitian dalam bentuk skripsi dengan judul Sanksi Malpraktik dan Resiko Medik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Dokter. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah metode hukum normative. Yang dapat penulis tentukan dari perbedaan yang dimiliki Sanksi malpraktik dan resiko medik ialah dalam UU Praktek Kedokteran dan UU Kode Etik Kedokteran ialah sanksi kepada dokter yang melakukan malpraktik yaitu medical malpractice, civil malpractice, daan administrative malptactice termasuk pelanggaran etik legal. Malpraktik merupakan tindakan sengaja dan lalai karena terpenuhinya unsur kesalahan. Melainkan resiko medik tidak merupakan tindak pidana dan termasuk kecelakaan medik merupakam kecelakaan yang memiliki unsur yang tidak dapat diduga sebelumnya, tidak dapat dicegah, dantidak boleh dipersalahkan. Kata Kunci: Dokter; Sanksi Malpraktik; Resiko Medik
Penahanan Anak yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Kekerasan (Studi Kasus Nomor: 6/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN Dps) GD. Bagus Maesha Kumara; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; Diah Gayatri Sudibya
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.1.1.2019.62-66

Abstract

Abstract Children are the next generation of the nation. Therefore, every child should get his right to play, learn and socialize. But the situation will turn around if the child commits a crime, such as a case of sexual harassment, violence against minors, cases of theft with violence. Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning Child Criminal Justice System. This SPPA Law is a substitute for Law Number 3 of 1997 concerning Juvenile Courts. The Juvenile Court Law is considered to be no longer in accordance with legal needs in the community and has not comprehensively provided special protection to children who are faced with the law. From this background, the problem will be discussed, (1) is Detention of children in a case decisions number: 6 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2017 / PN Dps, has fulfilled the Child Criminal Justice System? And (2) what are the judges' considerations in criminal imposing acts on whom children commit acts of theft by violence? This study uses normative legal research methods, uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, and examines the primary legal material and secondary legal material. The results of this study indicate that (1) Knowing the legal provisions for the detention of children, according to the juvenile justice system in case decisions number: 6 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2017 / PN Dps. (2) Knowing the judge's consideration in criminal imposing acts on whom the children criminal commit acts of theft by violence. Keywords: Children; judge considerations; theft by violence Abstrak Anak ialah penerus bangsa dimasa depan. Karena anak wajib diberikan hak untuk belajar serta bermain. Tetapi apabila anak melakukan tindak pidana keadaan akan berbalik. UU Tentang SPPA. UU SPPA ini adalah pengganti dari UU tentang Pengadilan Anak. UU Pengadilan Anak dinilai sudah tidak sesuai lagiuntuk melindungi hak-hak anak dihadapan hukum. Dari latar belakang tersebut maka permasalahannya: (1) Apakah Penahanan terhadap anak dalam putusan perkara nomor: 6/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN Dps, sudah memenuhi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak? dan (2) Bagaimanakah pertimbangan hakim didalam menjatuhkan pidana kepada Anak yang melakukan tindak pidana pencurian dengan kekerasan ? Penulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan koseptual, mengkaji dari bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa (1) Mengetahui ketentuan hukum penahanan anak menurut SPPA dalam putusan perkara nomor: 6/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN Dps. (2) Mengetahui pertimbangan hakim didalam menjatuhkan pidana kepada anak yang melakukan tindak pidana pencurian dengan kekerasan. Kata Kunci: Anak; pertimbangan hakim; pencurian dengan kekerasan
Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Oleh Terpidana Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 520 K/Pid.Sus/2017 (Payment Of Substitute Money By Convicted Persons In Cases Of Corruption Case Study Of Supreme Court Decision Number 520 K/Pid.Sus/2017) Anak Agung Ananda Putra Pangjaya; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; I Nyoman Sujana
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.2.1.2020.1-6

Abstract

Abstract-Evasion of money or fraud in using power is a complex problem that must be addressed, in order to achieve just and healthy and advanced economic growth and conditions. In the face of the complexity of the problem of corruption so far, it is wrong to fight the crime of embezzlement of money that has been known to be through means of criminal law as a criminal policy tool in combating or eradicating crime. compensation payments in cases of corruption include additional penalties other than decisions on criminal penalties and fines, there are also a number of problems here, namely, how to regulate substitute money payments made by convicted corruption cases and how the judge considers the payment of substitute money as a basis carried out by convicted cases of corruption. This type of research is normative juridical with the approach used, namely the negotiation approach and presented descriptively. The results of the discussion show that the voluntary implementation by the convict for a period of 1 (one) month after the Supreme Court Decision Number 520 K / PID.SUS / 2017 dated June 20, 2017 is a cumulative imperative and it fulfills the judicial and non-judicial aspects of judges' judgments. The advice that can be given is the payment of substitute money must be really carried out in the verdict and not until the imposition of criminal corruption only pays a fine with the transfer of the case only as a mistake administration of judges' decisions must fulfill juridical and non-juridical aspects but not ultra-light that the judge does not may impose a sentence higher than the maximum threat in the indicted market. Keywords: Convicted, Corruption, Replacement Money Abstrak-Penggelapan uang atau penyelewengan dalam menggunakan kekuasaan merupakan permasalahan yang komplek yang harus ditangani, agar tercapai pertumbuhan dan kondisi ekonomi yang adil dan sehat serta maju. Dalam menghadapi kompleksitas selama ini masalah korupsi, maka salah satu memerangi kejahatan penggelapan uang yang selama ini diketahui adalah melalui sarana hukum pidana sebagai alat kebijakan kriminal dalam memerangi atau memberantas kejahatan. Pembayaran ganti kerugian dalam kasus tindak pidana korupsi termasuk dalam pidana tambahan selain dari putusan penjatuhan hukuman pidana dan denda, adapun permasalahan yang diangkat disini yaitu, bagaimana pengaturan Pembayaran uang pengganti yang dilakukan oleh terpidana kasus tindak korupsi Dan bagaimana dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam Pembayaran uang pengganti yang dilakukan oleh terpidana kasus tindak pidana korupsi. Tipe penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif denga pendekatan yang digunakan yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan dan disajikan secara deskriptif. Hasil pembahasan menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaa secara sukarela oleh terpidana selama tenggang waktu 1 (satu) bulan sesudah Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 520 K/PID.SUS/2017 tertanggal 20 Juni 2017 bersifat imperatif komulatif dan sudah memenuhi aspek pertimbangan yuridis dan non yuridis hakim. Adapun saran yang dapat diberikan adalah pembayaran uang pengganti harus benar-benar dilaksanakan dalam penjatuhan vonisnya dan jangan sampai penjatuhan pidana korupsi hanya membayar denda saja dengan pengalihan kasusnya hanya sebagai kesalah administrasi putusan hakim harus memenuhi aspek yuridis dan non yuridis namun tidak ultra pelita yaitu hakim tidak boleh menjatuhkan hukuman lebih tinggi daripada ancaman maksimum dalam pasal yang didakwakan. Kata Kunci: Terpidana, Korupsi, Uang Pengganti
Penyelesaian Sengketa Para Pihak Yang Telah Terikat Dalam Perjanjian Arbitrase (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar) Ni Made Intan Maharani; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; Luh Putu Suryani
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.2.1.2020.119-123

Abstract

Aside from going through the courts, there are alternatives that can be passed through the dispute, namely negotiation, mediation and arbitration. Arbitration institutions are bodies chosen by the parties to the dispute to provide decisions regarding certain disputes, these institutions can also provide a binding opinion of a legal relationship from matters that have not arisen yet. The formulation of the problem raised in this study is how this arrangement for dispute resolution of parties who have been bound in an arbitration agreement, as well as how the judges' legal considerations in resolving disputes in an arbitration agreement. This research is a normative legal research. Arrangement for dispute resolution of parties that have been bound in the arbitration agreement is contained in law number 30 of 1999 concerning arbitration and alternative dispute resolution, in which the dispute resolution is handed over by professional Arbitrators who will act as judges or private courts who will apply the procedure the way the peace law has been mutually agreed upon by the parties to arrive at a final and binding decision. Judge's Legal Considerations in the Case Verdict of the Denpasar District Court Class I A Number 3/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Dps. that is based on Article 3 of Law Number 30 of 1999 Concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, which states that the District Court is not authorized to adjudicate disputes of parties who have been bound in an arbitration agreement Selain melalui pengadilan, teruntuk mengatasi kasus sengketa ada suatu alternatif yang dapat dilalui, yaitu dengan cara negosiasi, mediasi, dan arbitrase. Lembaga arbitrase merupakan badan yang dipilih oleh para pihak yang bersengketa untuk memberikan putusan mengenai sengketa tertentu, lembaga tersebut juga dapat memberikan pendapat yang mengikat dari sebuah keterkaitan hukum dari hal yang belum timbul sengketa. Adapun rumusan masalah yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana ini pengaturan penyelesaian sengketa para pihak yang telah terikat dalam perjanjian arbitrase, serta bagaimana pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam penyelesaian sengketa dalam perjanjian arbitrase. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normative. Pengaturan penyelesaian sengketa para pihak yang telah terikat dalam perjanjian arbitrase yaitu terdapat pada undang-undang nomor 30 tahun 1999 tentang arbitarse dan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa umum, yang dimana penyelesaian sengketa tersebut diserahkan Arbiter yang profesional yang akan bertindak sebagai hakim atau peradilan swasta yang akan menerapkan tata cara hukum perdamaian yang telah disepakati bersama oleh para pihak tersebut untuk sampai pada putusan yang final dan mengikat. Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Perkara Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Kelas I A Nomor 3/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Dps. yaitu didasarkan pada Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, yang menyatakan bahwa Pengadilan Negeri tidak berwenang untuk mengadili sengketa para pihak yang telah terikat dalam perjanjian arbitrase.
Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) I Made Kardiyasa; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.2.1.2020.78-82

Abstract

Hate speech in daily life people now such as expression, sedition, and provocation hate to other people and other community in many aspect such as religion, sex orientation, disabled, gender, racial , skin color, nationality and many else. If hate speech didn’t handle with effective way, efficient, and handle with corresponding with the valid law, so it can be impact social conflict that can increase discrimination action, violence and death loss. In this case there will be a bad impact which so danger for the hate speech victim, so in this case the writer’s get two solution to handle hate speech, that are protection law of hate speech victims and punishment criminal for the people who does hate speech. In this legal opinion writing, I am as a writer use normative method. In my experience, I do problem approach constitution which has related with hate speech, and then this research material reviewed. The result of this research is about law protective for the hate speech victims so that achievement can be protect them and the hate speech victims can feels safe. Hate speech can be says of criminal act because of what they have been done to hate speech victims. Unlawful actions that have been done with on propose or accidentally must be accounted for the acts that consist of constitution that happened and stated as acts that can be get a punishment in jail or fine. Ujaran kebencian dalam kehidupan manusia saat ini yang berupa ungkapan, hasutan, dan provokasi kebencian kepada seseorang atau suatu kelompok lain, dalam hal berbagai aspek berupa, agama, cacat, orientasi seksual, gender, ras, warna kulit, kewarganegaraan, dan lain-lain. Jika hate speech tidak di tangani dengan efektif, efesien dan ditangani sesuai hukum yang berlaku, bisa menimbulkan suatu dampak konflik sosial yang bisa memicu tindak diskriminasi, kekerasan dan atau penghilangan nyawa. Dengan timbulnya dampak yang sangat membahayakan bagi korban hate speech, maka penulis mendapatkan dua rumusan masalah dalam menangani hate speech yaitu, perlindungan hukum bagi korban hate speech dan sanksi pidana bagi pelaku hate speech. Penelitian ini mengunakan metode penulisan normative dan menggunakan pendekatan permasalahan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan hate speech Kemudian bahan penelitian di kaji. Hasil dari penelitian berupa perlindungan hukum bagi korban hate speech supaya tercapainya rasa aman dan dapat melindungi bagi mereka yang menjadi korban hate speech. Hate speech dapat dikatakan sebagai tindak pidana karena telah melakukan suatu Tindakan melawan hukum yang dilakukan dengan sengaja ataupun dengan tidak sengaja harus dipertanggungkawabkan atas tindakannnya berdasarkan undang-undang yang berlaku dan dinyatakan sebagai tindakan yang dapat dihukum kurungan atau denda.
Co-Authors A A Ngurah Bagus Krishna Wirajaya A. A Mas Stela Kurtika adi A.A Mas Karpeka Devi A.A. Ngr. Dwi Dananjaya A.A.Gde Oka Wisnumurti A.A.SG. Istri Sinta Maharani Adhi Wibisana, Anak Agung Ngurah Agus Hindiana Christantino Mek Agus Leo Adi Wibawa Agus Rai Mahardika Agustinus Samosir Anak Agung Ananda Putra Pangjaya Anak Agung Arista Purnama Sari Anak Agung Ayu Desy Nadhira Putri Anak Agung Ayu Gayatri Anak Agung Ayu Mas Merta Sari Anak Agung Ayu Wina Putri Mayuni Anak Agung Ayu Wina Putri Mayuni Anak Agung Ayu Wulan Pramesti Puja Dewi Anak Agung Bagus Ari Satya Dharma Anak Agung Bagus Indra Dwipraditya Anak Agung Bagus Sempidi Junior Anak Agung Dinda Trisna Kesumadewi Anak Agung Gede Agung Anak Agung Gede Agung Anak Agung Istri Agung Anak Agung Istri Mahaputri Anak Agung Istri Nadia Maheswari Devi Anak Agung Istri Pradnya Paramitha Anak Agung Ngurah Adhi Wibisana Anak Agung Ngurah Dharma Bayu Subandi Anak Agung Ngurah Oka Yudistira Darmadi Anak Agung Putra Agung Dwicahyana Anak Agung Tias Sandya Dianti anastasia Andrie Eka Putra Anggia Maharani Putri Annie Long Ashton Anom Bagus Sanjaya Antara, I Wayan Eka Antonius De Andrade Fahik Arianto Hulu Arini, Desak Gde Dwi Ayou Lestari Duarkossu Ayu Prasetya Dewi Ayu Ratih Indra Kusumawati Bagus Andika Artha Surya Bagus Putu Lanang Agastya Berliana Indah Sari Cahya Edy Priana Christin Dessy Natalia Cipta PutraI Ketut Wira Cipta Putra Cokorda Gede Agung Rama Yudha Cokorda Istri Ratih Laksmi Dewi Darly Taruna Dedi Romadhan Desak Ketut Linda Saraswati Desak Made Widiantari Indira Jyoti Desak Rurik Pradnya Paramitha Nida Desak Rurik Pradnya Paramitha Nida Desy Kristiani Rahma Putri Dewa Agung Ari Aprillya Devita Cahyani Dewa Ayu Adinda Ray Fiyanti Dewa Ayu Cahyani Paramitha Dewa Ayu Mareyta Astri Dewa Gede Agung Getsumeda Dewa Gede Ananta Prasetya Dewa Gede Dirgayusa Werdi Bumi Dewa Gede Widya Swastika Dewa Made Natha Dwitama Dewa Putu Ade Wicaksana Dewa Putu Mantera Diah Gayatri Sudibya Diah Gayatri Sudibya Diah Gayatri Sudibya Diah Gayatri Sudibya Dimas Putra Wicaksana Dwik Aditya Pramana Eka Andrean Ramadhan Elizabeth Novita Putri Dewatayani Sarmento Erlin Kusnia Dewi GD. Bagus Maesha Kumara Gede Agus Antonio Leovandy Gede Agus Sukawantara Gede Dwiki Cahyadi Gede Indra Yasa Asiawan Gede Kristya Yuan Prayoga Gede Oka Swarbhawa Gemaya Wangsa Gowinda Prasad Gregorius Yolan setiawan Gusti Ayu Erlin Widyaningsih Gusti Ayu Euanggelin Marsha Wangania Gusti Nyoman Adung Setiawan Guterres, Mirela Maria Ribeiro Haris Wirayuda Herowati Poesoko, Herowati Hery Sudiarto I Gde Ardi Suarbawa I Gede Agus Marta Dinata I Gede Agus Purna Jaya I Gede Agus Sudiantara I Gede Agus Surya Gunantara I Gede Arimastanaya I Gede Banyu Bagastya Nida I Gede Buonsu I Gede Dharma Yudha I Gede Fajar Manggala I Gede Herry Budikusuma I Gede Made Widia Permana I Gede Suariawan I Gede Susila Putra I Gede Yoga Pratama I Gede Yogi Arya Windiarta I Gede Yudi Arinjaya I Gusti Agung Ayu Candra Nigrat I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita Pritayanti Dinar I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita Pritayanti Dinar I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita Pritayanti Dinar I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita Pritayanti Dinar I Gusti Agung Gede Utara Hartawan I Gusti Agung Istri Arinda Praminingrat I Gusti Agung Mas Cahyani Dewi I Gusti Agung Prama Yoga I Gusti Ayu Firga Julia I Gusti Ayu Sukrisma Dewi I Gusti Dama Galang Devara I Gusti Ngurah Agung Bagus Bima Putra I Gusti Ngurah Agung Sweca Brahmanta I Gusti Ngurah Arya Brahmantara I Gusti Ngurah Ketut Satya Wicaksana I Gusti Ngurah Yudha Prasetia I Kade Juniana I Kadek Agus Sugiarta I Kadek Anom Suartama I Kadek Arya Wiryawan I Kadek Denny Harta Dwipayana I Kadek Faiza Putra Gunawan I Kadek Nova Astrawan I Kadek Purwadi Putra I Kadek Roger Budiastra I Kadek Suar Putra Dana I Ketut Irianto I Ketut Sukadana I Komang Aditya Diputra I Komang Arya Sentana Mahendra I Komang Oka Raharja I Komang Widnyana I Made Adi Endra Supardi I Made Aditya Dwipayana I Made Andy Sabda Permana I Made Andy Sabda Permana I Made Ariana I Made Arimbawa Wiraputra I Made Arjaya I Made Ary Supartawan I Made Budiyasa I Made Della Dwi Angga Saputra I Made Deni Pramudya Adi Putra I Made Dharma Putra I Made Dwi Mahardika I Made Dwi Narendra Dananjaya I Made Gede Adi Arya Natih I Made Gede Bagus Somayasa I Made Irvan Ariansyah Putra I Made Kardiyasa I Made Khrisna Dwi Payana I Made Krisna Bagus Wisena I Made Mardika I Made Minggu Widiantara I Made Minggu Widyantara I Made Minggu Widyantara I Made Minggu Widyantara I Made Minggu Widyantara I MADE MINGGU WIDYANTARA, I MADE MINGGU I Made Mudana Adi Putra I Made Oka Wiradharma i Made Puspasutari Ujianti I Made Rai Arya Suta Negara I Made Rai Dwi Surya Atmaja I Made Sepud I Made Subantara I Made Suniasta Amertha I Made Widi Adi Peremana I Made Wira Manik Prayascita I Made Yasa Wahyuda I Maoe Hinggu Widyantara I Nyoman Arya Mugi Raharja I Nyoman Budiantara I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha I Nyoman Gilang Radwithama I Nyoman Loka Hari Prabawa I Nyoman Putu Budiartha I Nyoman Putu Budiartha I Nyoman Putu Budiartha I Nyoman Subamia I Nyoman Sugiarta I Nyoman Sujana I Nyoman Sujana I Nyoman Sukrata I Nyoman Surya Natha I Nyoman Sutama I Nyoman Sutama I Nyoman Sutama I NYOMAN SUTAMA I Putu Agus Karmawan I Putu Andika Sanjaya I Putu Aris Sedana Putra I Putu Arya Wiguna Artana I Putu Bayu Permana I Putu Budi Astika I Putu Gede Anom Purnacandrama I Putu Gede Seputra I Putu Gede Seputra I Putu Gede Seputra I Putu Pradita Wiradinatha I Wayan Aditya Indrayana I Wayan Ari Subakti I Wayan Arthana I Wayan Arthanaya I Wayan Arthanaya I Wayan Bagas Surya Adi Pratama I Wayan Chandra Adyatma I Wayan Dedi Arta I Wayan Dedy Cahya Pratama I Wayan Edi Kurniawan I Wayan Edy Darmayasa I Wayan Kevin Mahatya Pratama I Wayan Kusuma Purwanta I Wayan Merta Jaya I Wayan Sunarta I Wayan Werasmana Sancaya I Wayan Wesna Astara I Wayan Yuda Atmaja Ibnu Maruf Ida Ayu Gede Adi Suandewi Ida Ayu Ketut Sarwini Ida Ayu Prawita Utami Putri Ida Ayu Putri Ary Yulandari Ida Ayu Sri Wahyuni Ida Ayu Vera Wirya Paramita Ida Ayu Viony Adniasari Ida Ayu Wayan Widyastuti Ida Bagus Ari Nugraha Ida Bagus Gede Arimbawa Putra Ida Bagus Gede Krismantara Manuaba Ida Bagus Wahyu Wira Kusuma Ida Bagus Wimba Pratama Ida Bagus Wimbha Nugraha Putra Pidada Ignasius Yosanda Nono Ilham Firdaus Indah Permatasari Intan Dian Vitaloka Jelantik, I Gusti Agung Istri Mahda Rayanna Johannes Ibrahim Kosasih Julius Roland Lajar Kade Richa Mulyawati Kade Richa Mulyawati Kadek Agus Mahendra Wijaya Kadek Bayu Krisna Juliantara Kadek Hary Harmawan Kadek Indra Prayogi Kadek Krisna Amacya Kadek Putra Dwi Payana Kadek Suryasantosa Kadek Wahyu Juniarta Kadek Wijana Kadek Yuda Kumala T.D Karma, Ni Made Sukaryati Kasirinus Jee Lua Ketut Danu Yudistira Khresna Wisantya Komang Adika Bayu Mahendra Komang Ayu Trisna Dewi Komang Devi Triveni Komang Gede Reska Joanykernia Pradila Komang Ikka Shintya Daivi Komang Krisna Prema Komang Wahyu Darmayanta Komang Wiraguna Kresensia Angelica Hardi lda Ayu Mirah Widnyani Linda Vianty Mala Takko Livia Kusomo Luh Ketut Ayu Andayani Luh Made Mahendrawati Luh Putu Sudini Luh Putu suryani Luh Putu Suryani Luh Putu Suryani Luh Putu Suryani Luh Putu Suryani Luh Putu Suryani Luh Putu Yustika Riani Kusuma Luiter Lubalu Made Adityaswara Amerta Yoga S Made Dwi Kurnia Dananjaya Made Dwi Mahayuni Dharmayanti Made Harum Pratiwi Made Mahardika Made Minggu Widiantara Made Minggu Widyantara Made Minggu Widyantara Made Rony Setiawan Made Satria Dharmayuda Marianus Oktavian Darung Mario Viano Rasi Wangge Mella Ismelina Farma Rahayu Meysin Liston Sinaga Michael Jose Rizal Nadila Purnama Sari Ngurah Arya Kusuma Ni Gusti Putu Wirawati Ni Kadek Ari Swartini Ni Kadek Derlin Yanti Ni Kadek Lia Sri Padmiani Ni Kadek Nilawati Dwi Cahya Ni Kadek Nisa Alfiyana Ni Kadek Pingkan Putri Natalia Ni Kadek Sri Wijayanti Ni Komang Arik Darmayanti Ni Komang Ayu Arniti Ni Komang Ayu Sri Agustini Ni Komang Ayu Triana Dewi Ni Komang Diana Trisnayanti Ni Komang Nanda Permata Dewi Ni Komang Putri Pratiwi Ni Komang Sri Herawati Octa Ni Luh Putu Sintya Purnama Dewi Ni Luh Putu Sri Laksemi Dharmapadmi Ni Luh Putu Yosi Pratiwi Ni Luh Putu Yuni Sartika Dewi Ni Made Dwi Ari Cahyani Ni Made Intan Maharani Ni Made Melly Deni Kiara Putri Ni Made Nindya Maheswari Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Made Ratna Pratiwi Ni Made Sasmita Ayuningrum Ni Made Sukariyati Karma Ni Made Sukaryati Ni Made Sukaryati Karma Ni Made Sukuryati Karma Ni Made Suryati Ni Made Swandari Ni Made Wismantari Ni Made Yeni Sukmawati Ni Made Yulia Chitta Dewi Ni Nyoman Gabriella Christiawan Putri Ni Nyoman Septiana Dewi Ni Nyoman Sonia Santhy Suryani Ni Putu Ayu Angreny Widhiastuty Ni Putu Ayu Mia Paramartha Sari Ni Putu Ayu Sri Darma Putri Ni Putu Dyah Ayu Karina Prabandari Ni Putu Lalitha Candra Laksmi Ni Wayan Dian Anggita Sari Ni Wayan Regina Novyanti Novitasari Kusuma Dewi Nyoman Ananda Bimastara Nyoman Gede Aditya Jay Medhika Nyoman Handytya Wiarsa Putra Pande Putu Dinda Novita Wijaya Pande Putu Rastika Paramartha Pius. A. Samponu Poly Pagna Putu Aditya Witanaya Putra Putu Agustina Mega Antari Putu Ayu Candradiva Saraswati Putu Ayu Sarina Selsa Oktaviani Putu Budiartha, I Nyoman Putu Cyntia Rizdyanti Putu Gede Prema Sena Putu Kayla Yunita Dewi Putu Pery Indrawan Putu Ryan Baskara Putu Suryani . Putu Wisesa Sagara Rendi Salasbi Rina Pratiwi Pudja I. A Ronaldo Darmawan Ronaldo Ragowino Bira SAKTI, Sawung Aji Bhawono Saripan, Hartini Sienny Karmana Sri Ulina Theresa Perangin-Angin Sugiartha, I Nyoman Gede Suryani, Luh Putu Teo Dentha Maha Pratama Tjokorda Istri Agung Devitia Widya Paramita Putri Ujianti, Ni Made Puspasutari Utari Paramita Devi Wayan Ardi Indra Jaya Wayan Artana Wibisana, Anak Agung Ngurah Adhi Widiati, Ida Ayu Putu Wisnumurti, Anak Agung Gede Oka