Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Asuhan Kesehatan Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kebidanan dan Keperawatan Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Scientific Journal of Reflection : Economic, Accounting, Management and Business Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Lemuru : Jurnal Ilmu Perikanan dan Kelautan Indonesia Infotekmesin JURNAL PERIKANAN TROPIS Jurnal Sains Manajemen dan Bisnis Indonesia Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi Abdi Masyarakat Jurnal Berdaya Mandiri Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA Jurnal Tadbir Peradaban ACROPORA: Jurnal Ilmu Kelautan dan Perikanan Papua SMBJ: Strategic Management Business Journal JURNAL AGROINDUSTRI HALAL PENA ABDIMAS : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Muslim Education Review Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Masyarakat APLIKATIF: Journal of Research Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities Jurnal Teknologi Pangan dan Industri Perkebunan
Mardiyana Mardiyana
Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, Pascasarjana, FKIP – UNS
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 138 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 138 Documents
Search

 6   7   8   9   10 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER DAN LEARNING CELL PADA ASPEK PENGETAHUAN DAN KETERAMPILAN SISWA DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN PACITAN Domas, Joko; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (379.515 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects in mathematics viewed from the emotional quotient of the students. The learning models compared were NHT, Learning Cell and classical model with scientific approach. This research used the quasi experimental research method. This population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools in Pacitan regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 261 students, divided into three groups, namely: 88 students in Experimental Group 1, 86 students in Experimental Group 2, and 87 students in Control Group. The instruments of the research include test of learning achievement of the knowledge aspect, test of learning achievement of the skill aspect, and questionnaire of emotional quotient. The technique of analyze data used the two-way multivariate analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows: (1) the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than the classical learning model with scientific approach, and the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects; (2) the students with the high emotional quotient had a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than those with the moderate and low emotional quotient, and the students with the moderate and low emotional quotient had the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects; (3) in each learning model with scientific approach, the students with the high emotional quotient had a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than those with the moderate and low emotional quotient, and the students with the moderate and low emotional quotient had the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects; (4) in each of the emotional quotient, the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than the classical model with scientific approach, and the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects.Keywords: NHT, learning cell, classical, scientific approach, emotional quotient, knowledge, skill.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THREE STEPS INTERVIEW (TSI) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Maharani, Rizqona; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (478.368 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was  to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the students’ multiple intelligences. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning of the three steps interview (TSI) type with scientific approach, think pair share (TPS) model type with scientific approach, and classical learning with  scientific approach. The type of this study was quasi experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade 8 students of Secondary Schools in Sukoharjo Regency. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and multiple intelligences questionnaire. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANOVA with unequal cell. Based on the hipothesis, the results of the study could be concluded as follows. (1) TSI with scientific approach got better learning achievement than TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach. In addition, TPS with scientific approach got better learning achievement than classical with scientific approach. (2) Students with logical mathematical intelligence got better achievement than students with linguistic intelligence and students with interpersonal intelligence, students with linguistic intelligence got better achievement than students with interpersonal intelligence. (3) Viewed from learning models, students with logical mathematical intelligence got better achievement than students with linguistic intelligence and students with interpersonal intelligence. However, students with linguistic intelligence got better achievement than students with interpersonal intelligence. (4) Viewed multiple intelligences’ categories, TSI model with scientific approach got better achievement than TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach. However, TPS with scientific approach got better achievement than classical with scientific approach.Keywords: Three Steps Interview (TSI), Think Pair Share (TPS), Classical Learning, Scientific Approach, and Multiple Intelligences.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DAN PAIRS CHECK DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Hafidhah, Tien Syarifah; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (375.269 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning models on the knowledge and skill aspect viewed from adversity quotient (AQ). The learning models compared were learning model of the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) with scientific approach, Pairs Check (PC) with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. This research was a quasi-experimental research. The population of the research was all of the eighth grade students of the State Junior High School in Sukoharjo. The instruments used to collect data were mathematics knowledge aspect test, mathematics skill aspect test and adversity quotient questionnaire. Technique of analyzing data that used was unbalanced two ways multivariat analysis of variance. From the research, it can be concluded that: (1) learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach gave better knowledge and skill aspect than learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, (2) students who have adversity quotient of Climber gave better knowledge and skill aspect than students who have adversity quotient of Camper and Quitter, students who have adversity quotient of Camper gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with the students who have adversity quotient of Quitter, (3) on each learning model, students who have adversity quotient of Climber gave better knowledge and skill aspect than students who have adversity quotient of Camper and Quitter, students who have adversity quotient of Camper gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with the students who have adversity quotient of Quitter, (4) on each adversity quotient, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach gave better knowledge and skill aspect than learning by using classical learning with scientific approach.Keywords: cooperative learning model, NHT, PC, classical learning, scientific approach, knowledge aspect, skill aspect.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) DITINJAU DARI KEINGINTAHUAN DAN GAYA KOGNITIF PESERTA DIDIK SMP DI KABUPATEN BLORA Wijaya, Agung Putra; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Suyono, Suyono
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 1, No 2 (2011): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (312.738 KB)

Abstract

 ABSTRACTThe purposes of this study are to know the different effect of each category of learning model, curiosity, and cognitive style, also their interaction towards mathematics achievement. This study is a quasi experimental research with 2x3x2 factorial design. The population is all students of junior high school in Blora. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random technique. The instruments used to collect data are test of prior knowledge in mathematics, curiosity questionnaire, cognitive style test (GEFT), and mathematics achievement test. The testing of hypothesis uses three-way analysis of variance with unequal cell. The testing of hypothesis concludes that (1) There is a different effect between each category of learning model. (2) There is a different effect among each category of curiosity. (3) There is a different effect among each category of cognitive style. (4) There is an interaction between learning model and curiosity towards mathematics achievement. (5) There is an interaction between learning model and cognitive style towards mathematics achievement. (6) There is an interaction between curiosity and cognitive style towards mathematics achievement. (7) There is an interaction among learning model, curiosity, and cognitive style towards mathematics achievement.Keywords: NHT, STAD, Curiosity, Cognitive Style, Mathematics Achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN PAIRS CHECK (PC) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA Andini, Fahimah; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed at determining the effect of models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the students’ logical mathematical intelligence. The learning models compared were learning model of the scientific Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), scientific Pairs Check (PC), and scientific classical. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade VII students of Junior High Schools in Surakarta. The instruments used for the data collection were mathematics achievement test and logical mathematical intelligence test. The data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the hypothesis, the results of the study can be summarized as follows. (1) The use of Scientific PC resulted better achievement than that of scientific TAI and with scientific classical, the use of scientific TAI resulted better achievement than that of scientific classical. (2) The students’ achievement who have high logical mathematical intelligence was better than those who have middle or low logical mathematical intelligence, and students who have middle logical mathematical intelligence were better than those who have low logical mathematic intelligence. (3) At the students with high logical matematical intelligence, scientific TAI, scientific PC, and scientific classical gave the same achievement. At the students with middle logical matematical intelligence, scientific PC gave the better achievement than that with scientific TAI and scientific classical. At the students with low logical matematical intelligence, scientific TAI gave the better achievement than that with scientific PC and scientific classical. (4) In scientific TAI, high logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement was better than the middle one, high and middle level of logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement were better than the lower one. In scientific PC, high logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement have equal achievement to the middle one students, high and middle level of logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement were better than the low one. In scientific classical, high logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement was better than the middle one, high and middle level of logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement were better than the students with low logical mathematical intelligence.Keywords: Scientific TAI, Scientific PC, Scientific Classical, Scientific Approach, Logical Mathematical Intelligence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING (DL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA Wicaksana, Hafid; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to know: (1) which one of thelearning models give a better achievement between PBL, DL, or classical with scientific approach, (2) which one has a better achievement between the student categorization, climbers, campers, or quitters, (3) at adversity quotient categorization, which one of the learning models give a better achievement between PBL, DL, or classical with scientific approach, and 4) at each the learning models, which one of the adversity quotient have a better achievement between student categorization, climbers, campers, or quitters. This was a quasi-experimental study. The research population were the seventh-grade students of all state junior high schools in Sukoharjo Regency in the academic year of 2014/2015. The data were analyzed through hypothesis testing using two-way ANOVA with unequal cells.Based on the analysis, the following conclusions are drawn. 1) The PBL model generates better learning outcomes than the DL model and the classical learning model using scientific approaches. The DL model generates better learning outcomes than the classical learning model using scientific approaches. 2) The students in the climber category have better learning outcomes than those in the camper category and the ones in the quitter category. The students in the camper category have better learning outcomes than those in the quitter category. 3) In the climber category, the students taught using the scientific PBL model have better learning outcomes in mathematics than those taught either using the scientific DL model or the classical learning model with scientific approaches. In the camper category, the students taught using the scientific PBL model have equal learning outcomes in mathematics to those taught using the scientific DL model but they have better learning outcomes than the students of the same category taught using the classical learning model with scientific approaches. 4) In relation to the PBL model using scientific approaches, the learning outcomes of the students in the climber category are better than those in the categories of campers and quitters. The students in the camper category have equal learning outcomes to those in the quitter category. In relation to the DL model using scientific approaches, the learning outcomes of the students in the climber category are equal to those in the camper category and better than those in the quitter categories.Keywords: Problem-Based Learning, Discovery Learning, Classical, Scientific Approaches, Adversity Quotient, Achievement.
PROSES BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF SISWA SMA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH PADA MATERI TURUNAN FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI EFIKASI DIRI (Studi Kasus pada Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri Punung) Genarsih, Tunjung; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Mardiyana, Mardiyana
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to describe the process of reflective thinking in solving the problem of high school students on the material terms of the derivative function viewed from self-efficacy. This research is classified in the qualitative descriptive study with the case study method. The subjects in this study were students of class XI IPA SMAN I Punung Pacitan in the second semester of academic year 2014/2015. The determination of the subject is by using purposive sampling, which is based on high, medium, and low self-efficacy. The research data taken from the test results of student works  and interviews of  students. Test of the credibility of the data is done by time triangulation. The data analysis technique is qualitative descriptive by Miles and Huberman. The results showed that (1) students with high self-efficacy using reflective thinking processes in a) stages of understanding the problem, able to select science, believing the truth, and actively create a consideration of the chosen solution; b) planning phase troubleshooting, make certain considerations, believing the truth, and select science; c) the stage of implementing the plan problem solving, able to explain the problem solving, linking information obtained by the problems encountered, deliberation, aware of the error and correct it, believing the truth; d) phase re-examine, re-examine, capable of linking the knowledge, correcting the error, explaining the final conclusion. (2) students with moderate self-efficacy use reflective thinking process in a) understand the problem, believing the truth, actively make judgments, and able to select science; b) the stage of implementing the plan problem solving, able to explain the solution of the problem, select the science that has been owned, believing the truth of solving the problem (3) students with low self-efficacy only use reflective thinking process in understanding the problem by being active characteristics in making judgments, be sure it is a correct problem-solving solutions.Keywords: reflective thinking, problem solving, mathematics, self-efficacy.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR Agung Nugroho, Tri Wahyu; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the students learning activity. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the numbered heads together with scientific approach (NHT-S), the cooperative learning model of the Think Pair Share with scientific approach (TPS-S), and model of classical learning with scientific approach (K-S). The type of the research was a quasi experimental research with the factorial design of 3 x 3. The population were all seventh grade students of Junior High School in Temanggung  regency on academic year 2014/2015. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and learning activities questionnaires. The hypotheses of the research was analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells at the significance level of . The results of the research were as follows. 1) NHT-S gave better mathematics achievements than TPS-S and K-S. Both TPS-S and K-S gave the same mathematics achievements. 2) Students with high learning activity gave better mathematics achievements than students with medium learning activity and low learning activity, while students with medium learning activity got mathematics achievements as good as students with low learning activity. 3) For NHT-S, students with high learning activity and medium learning activity got the same mathematics achievements, students with high learning activity got better mathematics achievements than student with low learning activity, and students with medium learning activity and low learning activity  got same mathematics achievements. For TPS-S and K-S, student with high, medium, and low learning activity got the same mathematics achievements. 4) For students with high and medium learning activity, NHT-S gave better mathematics achievements than TPS-S , both NHT-S and TPS gave the same mathematics achievement with K-S. For students with low learning activity , NHT-S, TPS-S  and K-S gave the same mathematics achievements.Keywords: NHT, TPS, Classical, Scientific Approach, Learning Activity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING, PROBLEM BASED LEARNING, DAN THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK TERHADAP KOMPETENSI PENGETAHUAN DAN SIKAP SOSIAL DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA Pinahayu, EK Ajeng Rahmi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to find out the different effects of Discovery Learning (DL), Problem Based Learning (PBL), and Think Pair Share (TPS) models with scientific approach towards students knowledge and social attitude competency viewed from the students learning styles. This study was a quasi-experimental research. The population of research was all of the 8th grade of the State Junior High School in Puworejo Regency on the second semester of 2014/2015 academic year. The hypothesis testing of research were conducted using a two-ways multivariate analysis of variance with different cells. The conclusions of this research were as follows. (1) DL provided better knowledge competency than PBL and TPS, while PBL and TPS was same. (2) DL and TPS provided same social attitude competency, and both provided better social attitude competency than PBL. (3) The knowledge competency of visual students was better than auditory and kinesthetic, and the knowledge competency of students in those types was same. (4) The social attitude competency of visual and auditory students was same, the social attitude competency of visual students was better than kinesthetic, the social attitude competency of auditory and kinesthetic students was same. (5) In DL, the knowledge competency of visual students was better than auditory, the knowledge competency of visual students was better than kinesthetic, the knowledge competency of auditory and kinesthetic students was same. In PBL and TPS, the knowledge competency of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic students was same. (6) In DL and TPS, the social attitude competency of those three types was same. In PBL, the social attitude competency of visual students was better than auditory, the social attitude competency of visual and kinesthetic students was same, the social attitude competency of auditory and kinesthetic students was same. (7) In visual, DL provided better knowledge competency than PBL and TPS, PBL and TPS  provided same knowledge competency. In auditory and kinesthetic, DL, PBL, and TPS provided same knowledge competency. (8) In visual and kinesthetic, DL, PBL, and TPS provided same social attitude competency. In auditory, DL and PBL provided same social attitude competency, DL and TPS was same, and TPS provided better social attitude competency than PBL.Keywords: Discovery Learning, Problem Based Learning, Think Pair Share, Scientific Approach, Knowledge Competency, Social Attitude Competency, Learning Styles.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL), GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA Hidayati, Dwi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract. The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on learning achievement viewed from student learning creativity. The learning models compared were problem based learning, group investigation and think pair share. This research used the quasi-experimental research method. The population of the research was all of the students in Grade VIII of Junior Secondary Schools of Banyumas Regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of research consisted of 295 students. Techniques of collecting data used were documentation, test, and questionnaire. Balance test used one way ANOVA test. From the research, it can be concluded as follows. (1) Learning model of PBL gave better mathematics learning achievement than model of GI and TPS, model of GI gave better mathematics learning achievement than model of TPS, (2) students who have high creativity gave better mathematics learning achievement than students who have medium and low creativity, students who have medium creativity gave better mathematics learning achievement than students who have low creativity, (3) in the students with high and low creativity, the GI learning model gave the same learning achievement in mathematics with the PBL and TPS learning model, the PBL learning model gave better learning achievement in mathematics the TPS learning model. The PBL, GI and TPS learning model gave the same learning achievement in mathematics, (4) in the PBL and GI learning model, the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with high creativity were better than the students with medium and low creativity, the students with medium and low creativity gave same the learning achievement in mathematics. In the TPS learning model, the students with high and medium creativity gave the same learning achievement in mathematics, the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with the high and medium creativity were better than the students the low creativity.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Group Investigation, Think Pair Share, Student Learning Creativity
Co-Authors Abdul Choliq Hidayat Aflich Yusnita Fitrianna Afrizal Abdi Musyafiq Agnes Reswari Ingkansari Agung Nugroho, Tri Wahyu Agung Putra Wijaya, Agung Putra Ambar Nurhayati Anak Agung Gede Sugianthara Anggrahini Anggrahini Annisa Swastika Any Kurniawati, Any Ari Kristiningsih Aritsya Imswatama Arsa’ad Kurniadi Aulia Ar Rakhman Awaludin Ayuningtyas, Laksmi Putri Aza Fauziana, Noer Berti Okta Sari, Berti Okta Bibet, Bibet Bily, M. Arda Budi Sasomo, Budi Budi Usodo Danar Supriadi Desi Gita Andriani Dewi Retno Sari Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Dian Ratna Ariyani, Dian Ratna Dwi Ambarwati, Dwi dwi hidayati Dwityaningsih, Rosita Dyah Ratri Aryuna Ek Ajeng Rahmi Pinahayu Eka Fitria Ningsih EKA RAHAYU PUJILESTARI, EKA RAHAYU Ekaningsih Haryati Eli Widoyo Retno Endang Hariyati Endang Sri Handayani Evila Purwanti Sri Rahayu, Theresia Fadillah Fahimah Andini Farida Nurhasanah Fina Hanifa Hidayati Fitri Apriyani Pratiwi, Fitri Apriyani Gatut Iswahyudi Hafidh Jauhari Harmei Mahar’ Aini Hera Susanti Hera Susanti, Hera Heri Cahyono Hikmah Yuliasari Hirtanto Hirtanto, Hirtanto Iim Marfuah Ika Wulandari Ikrar Pramudya, Ikrar Ilham Rais A Imam Sujadi Intan Sari Rufiana Isna Nur Lailatul F, Isna Nur Isnandar Slamet, Isnandar Jani, Ariyan Joko Domas, Joko Julian Reza Siwi Khusaini, Ahmad Komarudin Komarudin Kristin Yulianti Kristiningsih, Ari Kristiningsih, Ari Lutfi Syafirullah Mania Roswitha Marchamah Ulfa, Marchamah Mardi Mardi Marfuah Marfuah Marsela, Helen Mila Prametha, Novika Murni Handayani Murni Handayani Mustofa, Rizki Nana Hasanah Nanndo Yannuansa, Nanndo Nasution, Nur Baiti Naufalia Nuraya, Naufalia NISA, AN Noor Hidayati Novia Dwi Rahmawati Nugraha, Muhammad Rizky Ardi Nulipyeni, Riana Nurdifanti, Afhia Nurhidayah, Rika Nurlinda Ayu Triwuri Nursatin, Yuli Bangun Nurul Hidayatus, Nurul Nuryani Destiningsih, Nuryani Oto Prasadi Pitra Dwiningsih, Pitra Pradipta Annurwanda, Pradipta Prasetia, Vicky Prihastini Oktasari Putri Puji Ayuni PUJI LESTARI Puji Rahayu Pusaka, Semerdanta Qauli, Ismayan Rafiq, Arif Ainur Rahayu Sri W Rahayu, Theresia Evila P.S. Rahmat Hidayat Ratnasari Ratnasari Ratnasari, Ani Rino Richardo Riski Aspriyani Riyadi Riyadi Riyanto, Nandyar Fisthi Rizqona Maharani, Rizqona Ronayah, Ronayah Rosita Dwityaningsih Rosita, Rosita Dwityaningsih Rubono Setiawan Sabar Santosa Santi Purwaningrum Sasmika, Nanda Savitri, Maria Endah Septiana Wijayanti Siti Amirah Budiastuti Siti Rahayu Solehah, Imratu Solehudin, Solehudin Sri Subanti Stefy Erlinda Novalia, Stefy Erlinda Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Suhaida, Suhaida Sujatmiko, Ponco Sulistiyono Sulistiyono Sumanah Sumanah Supriadi Supriadi Supriyatin Supriyatin Susmono Susmono Sutanto, Aftoni Sutarman Sutarman Sutrima Sutrima Sutrisno Sutrisno Suyono Suyono Tien Syarifah Hafidhah, Tien Syarifah Toipur Toipur Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Silaningsih Tunjung Genarsih, Tunjung Very Hendra Saputra Wahyu Astuti Budi Wahyu Kurniawan Wahyuni, Ika Muji Wardani, Endang Purwati Westi Bilda, Westi Wicaksana, Hafid Wittriansyah, Khoeruddin Yolan Kusumaningtyas, Yolan Yundari, Yundari Yusnita Rahmawati