Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Asuhan Kesehatan Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kebidanan dan Keperawatan Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Scientific Journal of Reflection : Economic, Accounting, Management and Business Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Lemuru : Jurnal Ilmu Perikanan dan Kelautan Indonesia Infotekmesin JURNAL PERIKANAN TROPIS Jurnal Sains Manajemen dan Bisnis Indonesia Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi Abdi Masyarakat Jurnal Berdaya Mandiri Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA Jurnal Tadbir Peradaban ACROPORA: Jurnal Ilmu Kelautan dan Perikanan Papua SMBJ: Strategic Management Business Journal JURNAL AGROINDUSTRI HALAL PENA ABDIMAS : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Muslim Education Review Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Masyarakat APLIKATIF: Journal of Research Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities Jurnal Teknologi Pangan dan Industri Perkebunan
Mardiyana Mardiyana
Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, Pascasarjana, FKIP – UNS
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 138 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 138 Documents
Search

 7   8   9   10   11 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THREE STEPS INTERVIEW (TSI) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Maharani, Rizqona; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was  to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the students’ multiple intelligences. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning of the three steps interview (TSI) type with scientific approach, think pair share (TPS) model type with scientific approach, and classical learning with  scientific approach. The type of this study was quasi experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade 8 students of Secondary Schools in Sukoharjo Regency. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and multiple intelligences questionnaire. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANOVA with unequal cell. Based on the hipothesis, the results of the study could be concluded as follows. (1) TSI with scientific approach got better learning achievement than TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach. In addition, TPS with scientific approach got better learning achievement than classical with scientific approach. (2) Students with logical mathematical intelligence got better achievement than students with linguistic intelligence and students with interpersonal intelligence, students with linguistic intelligence got better achievement than students with interpersonal intelligence. (3) Viewed from learning models, students with logical mathematical intelligence got better achievement than students with linguistic intelligence and students with interpersonal intelligence. However, students with linguistic intelligence got better achievement than students with interpersonal intelligence. (4) Viewed multiple intelligences’ categories, TSI model with scientific approach got better achievement than TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach. However, TPS with scientific approach got better achievement than classical with scientific approach.Keywords: Three Steps Interview (TSI), Think Pair Share (TPS), Classical Learning, Scientific Approach, and Multiple Intelligences.
ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI POKOK LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI KESIAPAN BELAJAR DAN GAYA BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS XI IPA SMA N 3 SURAKARTA TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014 Wardani, Endang Purwati; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were: (1) knowing the characteristics of the misconception, and (2) knowing the causes of the misconception of the XI grade students in the academic year of 2013/2014 in  equation of circle and equation of tangent line of a circle viewed from the student’s readiness and style of learning. Qualitative research was applied in this research. The subject of the research are students of the eleven grade of SMA Negeri 3 Surakarta. The source of data was taken from informants (students), documentation (questionnaire), and test. Data collection was taken by using interview, diagnostic test, and questionnaire. Data validity used the source of triangulation. Data analysis used Miles and Huberman’s concept that are data collection, data reduction, presenting the data, and drawing the conclusion. The result of the research showed as follows: (1) students who are ready to learn and have the synthetic thinking style in understanding the locus of a point on the circle and determining the equation of tangent line of  a circle,  experience a misconception of theoretical concept. Meanwhile, in determining the circle equation, the students who are ready to learn with synthetic thinking style, don’t have any misconception.  (2) Students who are ready to study and have analytic thinking style in determining the equation of circle (determining the center point and the radius) experience a misconception in co relational concept. In understanding the locus of a point on the circle and determining the equation of tangent of line, students who are ready to study with analytical thinking style, experience a misconception in theoretical concept. (3) Students who are not ready to learn with synthetic thinking style experience a misconception in determining the equation of a circle (determining the center point and the radius), the misconception is in co relational and theoretical concept. In determining the equation of tangent line of a circle, students who are not ready with synthetic thinking style experience misconception of theoretical concept. While in understanding the locus of a point on the circle, generally   students who not ready to learn with synthetic thinking style do not experience misconception. (4) Students who are not ready to learn with analytical thinking style experience misconception in determining the equation of circle (determining the center point and radius), namely the misconception of co relational and theoretical concepts. In determining the locus of a point on the circle, students who are not ready to learn with the analytical thinking style experience misconception of theoretical concept. (5) In general the cause of misconception for the students is the difficulty of the students to classify the form of the equation of the circle and the equation of tangent line of a circle.Keywords: misconception, readiness to learn, thinking style
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING, GROUP INVESTIGATION, DAN THINK TALK WRITE DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK TERHADAP PRESTASI DAN KREATIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWA Nuraya, Naufalia; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims to know the different effect among learning models used i.e, Discovery Learning (DL) with scientific approach, Group Investigation (GI) with scientific approach, and Think Talk Write (TTW) with scientific approach. The research method was quasi experimental. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School of district Tegal year of 2014/2015. Sample was taken by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The hypothesis test used two way MANOVA with unbalanced cell. The results of the research were as follows: (1) a. Learning achievement of students treated by DL with scientific approach is better than those treated by GI and TTW with scientific approach, and learning achievement of student treated by GI with scientific approach is the same good with student treated by TTW with scientific approach; b. Mathematics learning creativity of student treated by DL and GI with scientific approach is better than those treated by TTW with scientific approach, and mathematics learning creativity of student treated by DL with scientific approach is the same good with student treated by GI with scientific approach; (2) a. Learning achievement of students who have high and medium reasoning ability is better than those who have low reasoning ability, and learning achievement of students who have high reasoning ability is the same good with students who have medium reasoning ability; b. Mathematics learning creativity of students who have high and medium reasoning ability is better than those who have low reasoning ability, and mathematics learning creativity of students who have high reasoning ability is the same good with students who have medium reasoning ability; (3) a. In the high, medium, and low reasoning ability, learning achievement of students treated by DL with scientific approach is better than those treated by GI and TTW with scientific approach, and learning creativity of student treated by GI with scientific approach is the same good with student treated by TTW with scientific approach; b. In the high, medium, and low reasoning ability, mathematics learning creativity of students treated by DL and GI with scientific approach is better than those treated by TTW with scientific approach, and learning creativity of students treated by DL with scientific approach is the same good with student treated by GI with scientific approach; (4) a. In DL, GI, and TTW with scientific approach, learning achievement of students who have high and medium reasoning ability is better than those who have low reasoning ability, and learning achievement of students who have high reasoning ability is the same good with students who have medium reasoning ability; b. In DL, GI, and TTW with scientific approach, mathematics learning creativity of students who have high and medium reasoning ability is better than those who have low reasoning ability, and mathematics learning creativity of students who have high reasoning ability is the same good with students who have medium reasoning ability.Keywords: DL, GI, TTW, Scientific Approach, Reasoning Ability, Learning Achievement, Mathematics Learning Creativity.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN AWAL SISWA SMP KELAS VIII SE-KABUPATEN SRAGEN Supriyatin, Supriyatin; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Mardiyana, Mardiyana
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract : The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from prior competency. The learning models compared were TPS with scientific approach, PBL with scientific approach and direct learning. This was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population were all students of Junior High School in Sragen. The samples of research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 297 students. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and prior competency test. The data analysis technique used unbalanced two ways anova. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The students treated with PBL learning model with scientific approach provided better learning achievement than those treated with TPS and those treated with direct learning model. The students treated with TPS learning model with scientific approach provided equal mathematics learning achievement to those treated with direct learning. (2) The students with high prior competency had better learning achievement than those with medium and those with low prior competencies. The students with medium prior competency had better learning achievement than those with low one. (3) In the TPS learning model with scientific approach and direct learning, the students with high and medium prior competencies had better learning achievement than those with low one. In the PBL learning model with scientific approach, the students with high prior competency had better learning achievement than those with low prior competencies and both of them provided the same learning achievement than those with medium one. (4) The students with high prior competency category had the same learning achievement in TPS type of learning model with scientific approach, PBL learning model with scientific approach and direct learning model. In medium prior competency category, PBL learning model with scientific approach provided better learning achievement than TPS learning model with scientific approach did, and both of them provided the same learning achievement as the direct learning did. Meanwhile in low prior competency category, PBL learning model with scientific approach provided better learning achievement than TPS learning model with scientific approach and direct learning model, and TPS learning model with scientific approach provided the same learning achievement as the direct learning did.Keywords: Mathematics Learning Achievement, TPS, PBL, Scientific Approach, Prior Competency 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER DAN LEARNING CELL PADA ASPEK PENGETAHUAN DAN KETERAMPILAN SISWA DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN PACITAN Domas, Joko; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects in mathematics viewed from the emotional quotient of the students. The learning models compared were NHT, Learning Cell and classical model with scientific approach. This research used the quasi experimental research method. This population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools in Pacitan regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 261 students, divided into three groups, namely: 88 students in Experimental Group 1, 86 students in Experimental Group 2, and 87 students in Control Group. The instruments of the research include test of learning achievement of the knowledge aspect, test of learning achievement of the skill aspect, and questionnaire of emotional quotient. The technique of analyze data used the two-way multivariate analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows: (1) the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than the classical learning model with scientific approach, and the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects; (2) the students with the high emotional quotient had a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than those with the moderate and low emotional quotient, and the students with the moderate and low emotional quotient had the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects; (3) in each learning model with scientific approach, the students with the high emotional quotient had a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than those with the moderate and low emotional quotient, and the students with the moderate and low emotional quotient had the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects; (4) in each of the emotional quotient, the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than the classical model with scientific approach, and the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects.Keywords: NHT, learning cell, classical, scientific approach, emotional quotient, knowledge, skill.
ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI PECAHAN DALAM BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA KELAS VIII DI SMP NEGERI 2 ADIMULYO KABUPATEN KEBUMEN TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014 Savitri, Maria Endah; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to: (1) identify the occurrence of misconceptions in the eighth grade junior high school students in the material form of algebraic fractions, for students which are classified to cognitive style field independence and field dependence, and (2) describe the occurrence of misconceptions eighth grade junior high school students in the material form of algebraic fractions, for students which are classified to cognitive style field independence and field dependence. This research used a descriptive qualitative  method with a case study. Subjects of this research are eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Adimulyo academic year 2013/2014. The sample of the research was taken by using the snowball sampling technique. The identification of the existence of misconceptions was done by using misconception diagnostic test. While the identification of the students' cognitive styles was conducted by using student cognitive style questionnaire instrument. Data validity used the source of triangulation method. Analysis of data use the model of Miles and Huberman. The results of this research indicate that: (1) misconceptions that occur in the FD students more likely to misconceptions on the concept of understanding the elements of the algebra and the terms of a fraction is called fractional form algebra, the concept of canceling, the concept of operating powers, and understand the properties the concept of distributive, (2) the highest misconceptions experienced by the FI students in understanding the concept of distributive properties, as well as understanding the elements of the algebra the condition is referred to as a fraction in the form of algebraic fractions, (3) causes of the misconceptions students FD is dominated by reasoning is not complete and students who lack of ability to process and memorize course, (4) factors causing of misconceptions students FI dominated by reasoning is not complete.Keywords: Misconceptions, algebraic fractions, cognitive style.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN THREE STEPS INTERVIEW (TSI) PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS Riyanto, Nandyar Fisthi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the learning models TAI, TSI, and direct learning model on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the students logical mathematical intelligence. The type of this study was quasi experimental study with 3x3 factorial design. The population were the eighth-grade students of junior high schools in Boyolali Regency in the academic year of 2015/2016. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and logical mathematical intelligence test. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANAVA with unequal cell. Based on the hipothesis test, they were concluded that: (1) The mathematics learning achievement of TAI was better than TSI and direct learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of TSI was better than direct learning model. (2) The mathematics learning achievement of students with high logical mathematical intelligence were better than average and low logical mathematical intelligences. Students with average logical mathematical intelligence were better than low logical mathematical intelligences. (3) Students with high logical mathematical intelligence who were treated by TAI, TSI, and direct learning models had same mathematics learning  achievement; students with average logical mathematical intelligence who were treated by TAI was same of TSI and was better than direct learning model, TSI was better than direct learning model; students with low logical mathematical intelligence who were treated by TAI had better mathematics learning achievement than TSI and direct learning model, TSI students were better than direct learning model model. (4) In TAI learning model, the mathematics learning  achievement of high logical mathematical intelligence were better than the average and lower logical mathematical intelligence, the mathematics learning achievementof average has equal with low logical mathematical intelligence; in TSI learning model, students with high logical mathematical intelligence has equal of average logical mathematical intelligence, the mathematics learning achievements of high and average logical mathematical intelligence were better than the low logical mathematical intelligence; in direct learning model, students with high logical mathematical intelligence has better mathematics learning achievement than high and average of logical mathematical intelligence,  students with average logical mathematical intelligence has better mathematics learning achievement than low of logical mathematical intelligence.Keywords:Team Assisted Individualization, Three Steps Interview, Direct Learning Model, Logical Mathematical Intelligence, Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL KOOPERATIF TIPE NHT DAN TPS TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI SISWA DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL POKOK MATERI PERSAMAAN LINEAR SATU VARIABEL PADA SISWA SMP NEGERI DI KOTA SURAKARTA Aspriyani, Riski; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research was aimed to know: (1) which gave achievement and motivation to do better, students who were subjected to cooperative models of NHT, TPS, or Conventional and students with high, medium, or low emotional intelligence; (2) on each model of learning and at each category of emotional intelligence which provided achievement and motivation to do better. The  population was all the students of  VII grade of Junior High Schools in Surakarta year of 2013/2014 and obtained a sample of  266 students. The instruments used was achievement test, motivation, and emotional intelligence questionnaire. Test requirements analysis included a multivariate normality and the variance-covariance homogeneity test. Balance test used a unbalanced one way multivariate and hypothesis testing used unbalanced two way multivariate. The results of research were: (1a) students subjected to NHT gave as good as the achievement of TPS but better than Conventional, and TPS provided a better achievement than Conventional. As well students subjected to NHT, TPS, and Conventional gave the same motivation, (1b) students with high emotional intelligence provided as good learning achievement as the students with moderate and low emotional intelligence. As well students who have high emotional intelligence gave better motivation than medium or low emotional intelligence but students with medium emotional intelligence provided as good  motivation as the students with low emotional intelligence; (2ai) in each learning model, students with high, medium, and low emotional intelligence gave the same achievement, (2aii) in NHT model, students with high emotional intelligence gave as good as the motivation of students with medium emotional intelligence. As well students with high and medium emotional intelligence gave motivation better than low emotional intelligence, (2aiii) in TPS model, students with high emotional intelligence gave motivation better than medium and low emotional intelligence but students with medium emotional intelligence gave as good motivation as students with low emotional intelligence, (2aiv) in Conventional model, students with high, medium, and low emotional intelligence gave the same motivation, (2bi) in each category of emotional intelligence, NHT gave as good as the achievement of TPS, but NHT and TPS gave better achievement than Conventional, (2bii) at high emotional intelligence, students subjected to NHT gave as good as the motivation of TPS, but NHT and TPS better than Conventional, (2biii) at medium and low emotional intelligence, students subjected to NHT, TPS, and Conventional gave the same motivation.Keywords: NHT, TPS, emotional intelligence, learning achievement and achievement motivation
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE CO-OP CO-OP, DISCOVERY LEARNING DAN PBL DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN NGAWI PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA Kurniawan, Wahyu; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims to know the effect among learning models used cooperative learning of Co-op Co-op type with scientific approach, discovery learning (DL) with scientific approach, and  the problem based learning (PBL) with scientific approach. The research method was quasi experimental. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School of district Ngawi Year of 2014/2015. Sampling was taken by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The hypothesis test used two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cell. The results of the research were as follows. (1) The mathematics learning achievement of students treated with Co-op Co-op type of cooperative learning model with scientific approach was better than that of those treated with DL learning model with scientific approach and those treated with PBL learning model with scientific approach, while that of those treated with DL learning model with scientific approach was as good as that of those treated with PBL learning model with scientific approach. (2) The mathematics learning achievement of students with high learning creativity was better than that of those with medium and low ones, while that of those with medium was better than that of those with low one. (3) In Co-op Co-op type of cooperative learning model with scientific approach, the learning achievements of the students with high, medium and low learning creativities were the same. In DL learning model with scientific approach, the students with high learning creativity had mathematics learning achievement as good as those with those with medium one, while those with high and medium learning creativities had better learning achievement than those with low on. In PBL learning model with scientific approach, the students with high and low creativities had mathematics learning achievement as good as that of those with medium one, while the students with high learning creativity had better learning achievement than those with low one. (4) The students with high and medium learning creativities treated with Co-op Co-op type of cooperative learning model with scientific approach had mathematics learning achievement as good as those treated with DL with scientific approach and those treated with PBL with scientific approach. The students with low learning creativity treated with Co-op Co-op type of cooperative learning model with scientific approach had mathematics learning achievement better than those treated with DL with scientific approach, while those treated with Co-op Co-op type of cooperative learning model with scientific approach had mathematics learning achievement with scientific approach and those treated with DL with scientific approach had learning achievement as good as that of those treated with PBL with scientific approach.Keywords: Co-op Co-op, DL, PBL, scientific approach, student learning creativity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DAN PAIRS CHECK DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Hafidhah, Tien Syarifah; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning models on the knowledge and skill aspect viewed from adversity quotient (AQ). The learning models compared were learning model of the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) with scientific approach, Pairs Check (PC) with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. This research was a quasi-experimental research. The population of the research was all of the eighth grade students of the State Junior High School in Sukoharjo. The instruments used to collect data were mathematics knowledge aspect test, mathematics skill aspect test and adversity quotient questionnaire. Technique of analyzing data that used was unbalanced two ways multivariat analysis of variance. From the research, it can be concluded that: (1) learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach gave better knowledge and skill aspect than learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, (2) students who have adversity quotient of Climber gave better knowledge and skill aspect than students who have adversity quotient of Camper and Quitter, students who have adversity quotient of Camper gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with the students who have adversity quotient of Quitter, (3) on each learning model, students who have adversity quotient of Climber gave better knowledge and skill aspect than students who have adversity quotient of Camper and Quitter, students who have adversity quotient of Camper gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with the students who have adversity quotient of Quitter, (4) on each adversity quotient, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach gave better knowledge and skill aspect than learning by using classical learning with scientific approach.Keywords: cooperative learning model, NHT, PC, classical learning, scientific approach, knowledge aspect, skill aspect.
Co-Authors Abdul Choliq Hidayat Aflich Yusnita Fitrianna Afrizal Abdi Musyafiq Agnes Reswari Ingkansari Agung Nugroho, Tri Wahyu Agung Putra Wijaya, Agung Putra Ambar Nurhayati Anak Agung Gede Sugianthara Anggrahini Anggrahini Annisa Swastika Any Kurniawati, Any Ari Kristiningsih Aritsya Imswatama Arsa’ad Kurniadi Aulia Ar Rakhman Awaludin Ayuningtyas, Laksmi Putri Aza Fauziana, Noer Berti Okta Sari, Berti Okta Bibet, Bibet Bily, M. Arda Budi Sasomo, Budi Budi Usodo Danar Supriadi Desi Gita Andriani Dewi Retno Sari Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Dian Ratna Ariyani, Dian Ratna Dwi Ambarwati, Dwi dwi hidayati Dwityaningsih, Rosita Dyah Ratri Aryuna Ek Ajeng Rahmi Pinahayu Eka Fitria Ningsih EKA RAHAYU PUJILESTARI, EKA RAHAYU Ekaningsih Haryati Eli Widoyo Retno Endang Hariyati Endang Sri Handayani Evila Purwanti Sri Rahayu, Theresia Fadillah Fahimah Andini Farida Nurhasanah Fina Hanifa Hidayati Fitri Apriyani Pratiwi, Fitri Apriyani Gatut Iswahyudi Hafidh Jauhari Harmei Mahar’ Aini Hera Susanti Hera Susanti, Hera Heri Cahyono Hikmah Yuliasari Hirtanto Hirtanto, Hirtanto Iim Marfuah Ika Wulandari Ikrar Pramudya, Ikrar Ilham Rais A Imam Sujadi Intan Sari Rufiana Isna Nur Lailatul F, Isna Nur Isnandar Slamet, Isnandar Jani, Ariyan Joko Domas, Joko Julian Reza Siwi Khusaini, Ahmad Komarudin Komarudin Kristin Yulianti Kristiningsih, Ari Kristiningsih, Ari Lutfi Syafirullah Mania Roswitha Marchamah Ulfa, Marchamah Mardi Mardi Marfuah Marfuah Marsela, Helen Mila Prametha, Novika Murni Handayani Murni Handayani Mustofa, Rizki Nana Hasanah Nanndo Yannuansa, Nanndo Nasution, Nur Baiti Naufalia Nuraya, Naufalia NISA, AN Noor Hidayati Novia Dwi Rahmawati Nugraha, Muhammad Rizky Ardi Nulipyeni, Riana Nurdifanti, Afhia Nurhidayah, Rika Nurlinda Ayu Triwuri Nursatin, Yuli Bangun Nurul Hidayatus, Nurul Nuryani Destiningsih, Nuryani Oto Prasadi Pitra Dwiningsih, Pitra Pradipta Annurwanda, Pradipta Prasetia, Vicky Prihastini Oktasari Putri Puji Ayuni PUJI LESTARI Puji Rahayu Pusaka, Semerdanta Qauli, Ismayan Rafiq, Arif Ainur Rahayu Sri W Rahayu, Theresia Evila P.S. Rahmat Hidayat Ratnasari Ratnasari Ratnasari, Ani Rino Richardo Riski Aspriyani Riyadi Riyadi Riyanto, Nandyar Fisthi Rizqona Maharani, Rizqona Ronayah, Ronayah Rosita Dwityaningsih Rosita, Rosita Dwityaningsih Rubono Setiawan Sabar Santosa Santi Purwaningrum Sasmika, Nanda Savitri, Maria Endah Septiana Wijayanti Siti Amirah Budiastuti Siti Rahayu Solehah, Imratu Solehudin, Solehudin Sri Subanti Stefy Erlinda Novalia, Stefy Erlinda Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Suhaida, Suhaida Sujatmiko, Ponco Sulistiyono Sulistiyono Sumanah Sumanah Supriadi Supriadi Supriyatin Supriyatin Susmono Susmono Sutanto, Aftoni Sutarman Sutarman Sutrima Sutrima Sutrisno Sutrisno Suyono Suyono Tien Syarifah Hafidhah, Tien Syarifah Toipur Toipur Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Silaningsih Tunjung Genarsih, Tunjung Very Hendra Saputra Wahyu Astuti Budi Wahyu Kurniawan Wahyuni, Ika Muji Wardani, Endang Purwati Westi Bilda, Westi Wicaksana, Hafid Wittriansyah, Khoeruddin Yolan Kusumaningtyas, Yolan Yundari, Yundari Yusnita Rahmawati