p-Index From 2021 - 2026
13.432
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Teknik Sipil dan Arsitektur Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) Pixel : Jurnal Ilmiah Komputer Grafis Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat AbdiMas JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Arsitektur Corruptio Journal of Architectural Design and Development (JAD) Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Arsitekta Interdisciplinary Social Studies Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Journal of Social Research Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat : Pemberdayaan, Inovasi dan Perubahan Ius Positum: Journal of Journal Of Law Theory And Law Enforcement Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi dan Sosial Politik NALAR: Journal Of Law and Sharia Journal of Architecture and Human Experience Journal of Innovative and Creativity JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Ruang Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Tijarah Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara COSMOS Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum Referendum Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum Dan Administrasi Publik Wissen: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi PESHUM Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan hukum Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora INLAW
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Urgensi Persetujuan Pemilik Data dalam Pengelolaan Data Pribadi oleh Platform Digital Elvina Putri Maheswari; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Sosial Politik Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): April - Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/jiksp.v2i4.2498

Abstract

The advancement of information technology has led to an increase in the collection and processing of personal data by various digital platforms. This phenomenon presents new challenges in the protection of privacy rights, particularly regarding the importance of consent as a legal basis for data management. This study aims to analyze the urgency of data subject consent in the management of personal data by digital platforms and to evaluate the effectiveness of its regulation under Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection. The main problem formulation focuses on how consent functions in ensuring legal protection for data owners and how its implementation is carried out in practice. This research applies a normative juridical method through statutory and literature approaches. The results show that although the PDP Law explicitly regulates the principle of consent, there remain implementation gaps in the field, including lack of information transparency, unclear consent mechanisms, and weak supervision. Therefore, reinforcement is needed through derivative regulations, the development of effective control mechanisms, and the improvement of public digital literacy. The conclusion affirms that consent is not merely an administrative formality but a fundamental guarantee of private rights protection. Recommendations are provided for policymakers and digital service providers to establish a trustworthy and law-abiding data governance system.
Digitalisasi Akses Pemohon di Mahkamah Konstitusi: Antara Efisiensi Prosedural dan Fragmentasi Due Process of Law Daniel Tata Gabe; Meiddy Dwi Darmawan; Nur Ramadhan Alqadr; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 8 (2026): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i8.3597

Abstract

The digitalization of petitioner access in judicial review at the Constitutional Court (MK) creates a paradoxical impact: procedural efficiency increases, yet due process guarantees become fragmented. This normative juridical research analyzes MK internal regulations (PMK No. 2/2021) and the implementation of e-filing and hybrid hearing systems. The main findings reveal that the absence of standardized electronic document authentication, algorithmic legal standing verification without clarification mechanisms and inadequate petitioner data protection constitute primary sources of procedural fragmentation. This study recommends reforming PMK to accommodate cybersecurity standards and alternative access mechanisms for petitioners with digital limitations.
Kendala Normatif Penerapan E-Litigasi dalam Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Annisa Nurmalasari Hutapea; Eliza Yuniar; Kusuma Daniel Kusnadi; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 8 (2026): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i8.3629

Abstract

The implementation of e-litigation in the Constitutional Court represents an institutional response to the demands of digital transformation within the constitutional justice system. However, its application faces fundamental normative challenges, particularly the lack of comprehensive regulations governing electronic proceedings and the insufficient protection of the constitutional rights of litigants in a digital environment. This study aims to analyze and identify normative gaps in the regulatory framework of e-litigation in the Constitutional Court and to examine their implications for safeguarding the constitutional rights of the parties involved. Employing normative legal research methods through statutory, conceptual and analytical approaches, this study finds that the existing regulations of the Constitutional Court on e-litigation remain inadequate in several key aspects. These include the legal validity of electronic evidence, data protection for litigants, guarantees of digital accessibility for marginalized groups and mechanisms for addressing technical disruptions that may affect court proceedings. The novelty of this research lies in the construction of a new normative framework, namely the Trias Digitalis Constitutionalis Principle, which encompasses three dimensions: equitable accessibility, digital procedural integrity and constitutional guarantees within the electronic sphere. This study recommends a comprehensive revision of the Constitutional Court’s regulations on e-litigation, along with the development of more detailed technical rules.
Realitas Indepedensi Hakim Konstitusi dalam Pengambilan Putusan Berbasis Data Digital Brandi Stefano Pedo; Muhamad Aldika Adha Wirya; Theo Prapaskah; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 8 (2026): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i8.3641

Abstract

The digital transformation within the constitutional justice ecosystem has shifted the evidentiary paradigm from conventional methods to electronic data-based systems, carrying fundamental implications for the principle of judicial independence. This study aims to analyze the reality of Constitutional Judges' independence amidst the complexity of decision-making reliant on digital data and to identify new forms of threats to judicial autonomy that are technical and psychological in nature. Employing a normative legal research method with a socio-legal approach, this study deconstructs the regulatory construction of digital evidence under the Constitutional Court Law and its derivatives, while evaluating their impact on the judicial deliberation process. The findings reveal that the absence of standardized protocols for digital data authentication and cybersecurity creates a "normative vacuum," compelling judges to rely excessively on external expert interpretations (technical dependency), thereby eroding their intellectual autonomy. Furthermore, the phenomenon of "algorithmic pressure," stemming from data-driven manipulation of public opinion on social media, is proven to induce subconscious cognitive biases that disturb the judges' internal freedom of mind. This study argues that judicial independence in the digital era can no longer be secured solely through traditional political protections; rather, it requires a conceptual reconstruction encompassing "digital sovereignty." As a solution, this research proposes the establishment of an internal Digital Forensics Center for the Constitutional Court, the enactment of Constitutional Digital Evidence Standards mandating algorithmic auditability and the ratification of a Digital Ethics Protocol to mitigate risks of subtle technology-based interventions.
Perspektif Hukum Normatif terhadap Pelindungan Data Genetik dalam UU PDP 2022 Alezra Pramesti Bonde; Shilvy Anggraini; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna; Andika Nugraha Santoso; Ruth Elleny
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 4 (2026): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i4.3966

Abstract

The rapid development of genomic technology and the digitalization of healthcare systems have significantly increased the collection, storage and processing of genetic data across medical services, biomedical research, pharmaceutical industries and artificial intelligence-based health technologies. Genetic data possess distinctive characteristics compared to ordinary personal data because they are unique, permanent, immutable and biologically linked to family members. These characteristics place genetic data among the most sensitive categories of personal information and necessitate enhanced legal protection. Indonesia, through Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection, recognizes genetic data as a category of specific personal data. Nevertheless, the current regulatory framework remains general in nature and does not specifically regulate the processing, storage, utilization, cross-border transfer and deletion of genetic information. This study aims to analyze the legal protection of genetic data under the Indonesian Personal Data Protection Law and compare it with regulatory frameworks established under the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Singapore’s Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA). This research employs normative legal research methods using statutory, conceptual and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that although the recognition of genetic data as specific personal data constitutes a significant advancement in Indonesian law, the existing framework lacks sector-specific safeguards comparable to those found in the European Union, Singapore and South Korea. The absence of detailed regulations may create legal uncertainty, facilitate genetic discrimination, enable misuse of health information and undermine individual privacy rights. Therefore, Indonesia requires more comprehensive implementing regulations and specialized oversight mechanisms to ensure adequate protection of genetic data within the evolving digital health ecosystem.
Juridical Construction of Data Accuracy Principles in Personal Data Protection Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia and Singapore Seroja Rizki Amelia; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3621

Abstract

The transformation of personal information into strategic commodities within digital ecosystems has elevated data quality governance beyond mere administrative concerns to a constitutional imperative. This study examines the juridical construction of the accuracy principle within Indonesia's Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection (PDP Law) and contrasts this with Singapore's Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (PDPA). Using normative-comparative legal research enriched with statutory, conceptual, and comparative functionalism approaches, this research evaluates whether Indonesia's regulatory framework provides sufficient operational certainty for data controllers and adequate protection for data subjects. The analysis reveals that while Article 16 of the PDP Law nominally mandates accuracy, completeness, and consistency, the provision remains declarative and lacks definitional precision, temporal updating mechanisms, and clear liability parameters. Conversely, Singapore's PDPA operationalizes accuracy through the Accuracy Obligation and Correction Obligation, enforced by an independent Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) with investigative and sanctioning powers. This study proposes a juridical reconstruction of Indonesia's accuracy principle through periodic data audits, effective correction protocols, risk-based governance calibration, and the establishment of an independent supervisory authority with quasi-judicial competencies.  
Transparency and Public Access to Electronic Civil Case Documents: Between Openness and Data Privacy Sekar Galuh Ardelia; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17892702

Abstract

The implementation of the electronic court system in Indonesia has brought numerous benefits, such as increased transparency and accountability of the judiciary. However, this system also poses challenges regarding the protection of personal data contained in case documents. Public information openness must be balanced with strict regulations to protect the privacy of individuals involved in legal proceedings. This research analyzes the challenges and policy recommendations aimed at strengthening the balance between transparency and personal data protection in the electronic court system. The recommendations include the development of derivative regulations for the PDP Law, the implementation of secure document management systems, and training for court officials and the public regarding information access rights. This study also suggests further research on the impact of transparency on public trust and international comparative studies to improve the implementation of the electronic court system in Indonesia
Oversharing di Kalangan Remaja dan Mahasiswa serta Ancaman terhadap Privasi Menurut UU Pelindungan Data Pribadi Yunesia Amelia Renanta; Reysha Aurelia Shabilla; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Indonesian Journal of Law Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): INLAW - APRIL 2025
Publisher : PT. INOVASI TEKNOLOGI KOMPUTER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Fenomena oversharing di kalangan remaja dan mahasiswa mengalami peningkatan signifikan seiring berkembangnya media sosial dan akses digital. Informasi pribadi yang dibagikan secara berlebihan, tanpa pertimbangan risiko privasi, menimbulkan berbagai ancaman terhadap perlindungan data pribadi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara yuridis ancaman yang ditimbulkan dari praktik oversharing serta relevansi dan efektivitas perlindungan hukum berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini mencakup: (1) bagaimana oversharing dapat menjadi ancaman terhadap privasi remaja dan mahasiswa, dan (2) sejauh mana Undang-Undang PDP mampu memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap praktik oversharing tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur ilmiah, serta analisis praktik digital di kalangan pengguna muda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa oversharing dapat menimbulkan risiko kebocoran, penyalahgunaan data, hingga pelanggaran hak privasi, sementara pengaturan dalam UU PDP belum sepenuhnya menjangkau dinamika digital yang terjadi di ranah media sosial secara real time. Penelitian ini menyarankan pentingnya peningkatan literasi digital, penguatan norma hukum turunan, serta penegakan hukum yang responsif terhadap praktik oversharing. Dengan demikian, perlindungan data pribadi di kalangan remaja dan mahasiswa dapat terjamin secara lebih maksimal
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Penggunaan CCTV Terhadap Privasi Di Ruang Publik Dio Fredrick Hezekiel Sitorus; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Indonesian Journal of Law Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): INLAW - MEI 2025
Publisher : PT. INOVASI TEKNOLOGI KOMPUTER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertanggungjawaban hukum penggunaan CCTV terhadap privasi individu di ruang publik dalam kerangka Undang-Undang No. 27 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi. Latar belakang penelitian ini adalah meningkatnya penggunaan CCTV sebagai alat pengawasan di ruang publik yang berpotensi mengancam hak privasi warga, sehingga diperlukan kajian hukum yang mendalam untuk menjamin perlindungan data pribadi. Rumusan masalah yang dikaji mencakup bagaimana mekanisme pertanggungjawaban hukum pengelola CCTV apabila terjadi pelanggaran privasi serta peran Undang-Undang Tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi dalam mengatur dan melindungi data pribadi yang terekam. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif melalui studi dokumentasi regulasi, literatur, dan analisis putusan pengadilan terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengelolaan data rekaman CCTV harus memenuhi prinsip-prinsip perlindungan data pribadi, dan setiap pelanggaran dapat dikenai sanksi hukum berdasarkan ketentuan Undang-Undang Tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi. Selain itu, terdapat tantangan dalam implementasi regulasi yang meliputi aspek teknis dan pengawasan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa perlindungan privasi melalui pengaturan CCTV di ruang publik harus diperkuat dengan pengawasan ketat serta edukasi bagi pengelola data. Sebagai saran, perlu peningkatan kesadaran hukum serta pembaruan kebijakan yang lebih rinci guna memastikan hak privasi warga tetap terlindungi secara optimal.
Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penggunaan Data Pribadi Palsu Untuk Pinjaman Online Untuk Kepentingan Pribadi Muhammad Raydafi Alfadillah; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Indonesian Journal of Law Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): INLAW - MEI 2025
Publisher : PT. INOVASI TEKNOLOGI KOMPUTER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Maraknya penggunaan data pribadi palsu dalam pengajuan pinjaman online menimbulkan persoalan hukum yang kompleks, khususnya terkait keabsahan perikatan dan perlindungan terhadap data pribadi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana hukum positif di Indonesia, khususnya Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi, merespons fenomena tersebut. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini mencakup dua hal: bagaimana karakteristik pelanggaran hukum dalam penggunaan data pribadi palsu untuk pinjaman online, dan bagaimana tanggung jawab hukum para pihak yang terlibat, termasuk penyelenggara fintech. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan serta studi kasus yang relevan. Teori perlindungan hukum dan asas pertanggungjawaban menjadi dasar analisis dalam membedah dimensi hukum dari tindakan tersebut. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan data palsu merupakan pelanggaran terhadap prinsip lawful processing dalam perlindungan data, sekaligus memenuhi unsur perbuatan melawan hukum secara perdata maupun pidana. Selain itu, lemahnya verifikasi identitas oleh penyelenggara pinjaman online turut memperbesar potensi pelanggaran. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya penguatan regulasi teknis dan peningkatan kewajiban platform dalam memverifikasi data pengguna. Penulis menyarankan agar aparat penegak hukum, pembuat kebijakan, dan pelaku industri keuangan digital bekerja sama dalam membangun sistem perlindungan data yang responsif terhadap modus-modus penipuan berbasis digital.
Co-Authors Achmad Edi Subiyanto Ade Hari Siswanto Adzaky Luthfi Radiant Ahmad Redi Aida Hanan Putri Salsabil Akmalia Salsabila Al Satria Diah Alamsyah, Rizki Alarode Lahoya Simbolon Alezra Pramesti Bonde Alfiana, Rita Alisya Putri Santoso Aliza Yasmin Yusuf Alvarindo, Arif Amanda Jihan Namira Amanda Jihan Namira Anatomi Muliawan Andika Nugraha Santoso Anesya Fritiana Anisyah Sutopo, Hanan Anita Anita Anna Triningsih Annisa Fitria Annisa Nurmalasari Hutapea Antika Gestia Arkaan Daffa Astri Anggraeni Putri Athaya Alghaniyyu Rahmatulloh Atmojo, Talitha Maheswari Ning AYU WULANDARI Ayu Wulandari Azis, Rizka Amelia Aziz, Rizka Amelia Bahtiar Hamza Bella Fistya Asherli Berto Purnomo Sidik Brandi Stefano Pedo Chresto Eirene Citra Winona Daishahwa Daishahwa, Daishahwa Daniel Tata Gabe Darman, Melani Delvi Eka Ariyanti Dhiyaksa Nugraha Dio Fredrick Hezekiel Sitorus Edward, Ryan Fransisco Effendy, D. Andry Elda Septi Darmayanti Elda Septi Darmayanti Eliza Yuniar Elvina Putri Maheswari Fadia Intan Sutisna Faiqotul, Fina Faisal Santiago Faisal Santiago, Faisal Fakrulloh, Zudan Arief Farha Nadiah Faris Dhafin Razaqa Alwani Fariz Amrullah Hakim Feriza, Gousta Fika Nurmajulia Andiani Fika Nurmajulia Andiani Filal Khair Fitri, Gischa Adelia Fransisca Elia Merry Paskah Mangunsong Fritiana, Anesya Galuh Candra Utami Harahap, Pardamaian Hartanto, Annisa Ramadhani Henry Arianto Hikmawati, Elok Hutapea, Annisa Nurmalasari I Gede Hartadi Kurniawan I Made Kanthika Intan Nazili Irdanuraprida, Irdanuraprida Irmanjaya Thaher Ismaya Rahailia Nasution Juanda Juanda Kantikha, I Made Khetrina Maria Angnesia Kusuma Daniel Kusnadi Kusuma Daniel Kusnadi L. M. F. Purwanto L.M.F Purwanto L.M.F Purwanto L.M.F. Purwanto Lenatia, Lenatia Lengkong, Ivany Lianto, Fermanto Mangunsong, Fransisca Elia Merry Paskah Maryanih Maryanih Maryanih Meiddy Dwi Darmawan Meiddy Dwi Darmawan Mochamad Yulian Fadhli Saputra Mugiono Mugiono, Mugiono Muhamad Aldika Adha Wirya Muhammad Raydafi Alfadillah Nadiroh, Aenun Naswa Fiolla Anggraini Naya Indah Sahqia Nayla Azzahra Khaerunnisa Nazarudin Khuluk Nova Reana Wahida Nufus, Hayattun Nugraha, Karindra Alvian Nur Ramadhan Alqadr Nurhayani nurhayani Pardamean Harahap Parlin Jonatan Panjaitan Pedo, Brandi Stefano Pratama, Muhamad Noval Faris Priscila, Michel Purwanti, Yani Purwanto, L.M.F Putri, Ramadani Rahmadani, Nita Octaviana Reysha Aurelia Shabilla Reysha Aurelia Shabilla Rosalia Eka Kurnia Nurcahyani Ruth Elleny Savana Maulia Sekar Galuh Ardelia Seroja Rizki Amelia Shafa Salsabila Shifa Arifatunnisa Shilvy Anggraini Sri Mulyati Sultan Reza Islami Sultan Reza Islami Suprajogi, Agus Suryajaya Hakim Sutopo Syifa Ramadani Talitha Kamilah Theo Prapaskah Verina Dwi Muryani Wardhani, Dwi Kusumo Wasis Susetio Widiatno, Men Wih Winda Agustina Wyanda Kinanti Syauqi Ramadhani Yaffa Ivana Faustina Yani Purwanti Yunesia Amelia Renanta Yunesia Amelia Renanta Yunita Sari, Kamelia Zhillan Zalzabilla Albana Zudan Arief Fakrulloh Zulfikar Judge