Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
12.893
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Teknik Sipil dan Arsitektur Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) Pixel : Jurnal Ilmiah Komputer Grafis Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat AbdiMas JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Jurnal Arsitektur Pendapa Losari : Jurnal Arsitektur, Kota dan Pemukiman Jurnal Anala Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Arsitektur Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Journal of Architectural Design and Development (JAD) GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Arsitekta Interdisciplinary Social Studies Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Journal of Social Research Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat : Pemberdayaan, Inovasi dan Perubahan Journal Of World Science Ius Positum: Journal of Journal Of Law Theory And Law Enforcement SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi dan Sosial Politik NALAR: Journal Of Law and Sharia Journal of Architecture and Human Experience Journal of Innovative and Creativity JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Ruang Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Tijarah Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara COSMOS Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum Referendum Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum Dan Administrasi Publik Wissen: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi PESHUM Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan hukum Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Publikasi Penelitian Ilmiah Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Wiraguna, Sidi Ahyar
Universitas Esa Unggul
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 108 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 108 Documents
Search

 7   8   9   10   11 
Pembuktian Digital dalam Sengketa Perdata: Menguji Validitas Formil dan Materiil Dokumen Elektronik di Era Modern Galuh Candra Utami; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i4.1360

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has fundamentally transformed civil legal interactions, making electronic documents such as instant messages, online transactions, and digital contracts primary forms of evidence in many civil disputes. However, their admissibility in judicial proceedings remains fraught with challenges concerning formal and material validity. This study aims to identify juridical and technical obstacles in digital evidence and to formulate an ideal model for civil procedural law that ensures reliable electronic proof. A normative-juridical approach with qualitative analysis was employed, combining doctrinal research through legislative review, jurisprudence, and scholarly literature with case studies of court decisions involving electronic evidence, particularly in divorce disputes. The findings reveal that inconsistent judicial treatment stems from the absence of specific procedural rules in Indonesia’s civil procedure framework still rooted in colonial-era HIR and RBg alongside limited digital infrastructure and low technological literacy among judicial actors. In response, the study proposes an integrated legal construction model featuring explicit provisions in the upcoming Civil Procedure Code, adoption of the functional equivalence principle, institutionalization of digital forensic experts in litigation, and procedural safeguards for vulnerable parties. The research concludes that only through holistic reform of the evidentiary paradigm can Indonesia’s civil justice system guarantee fairness, legal certainty, and relevance in the digital era.
Gugatan Verstek: Menimbang Hak Tergugat Dan Efisiensi Proses Beracara Adzaky Luthfi Radiant; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v6i1.5791

Abstract

Default judgments (verstek) are commonly applied in Indonesian civil proceedings to address court backlogs, yet they risk violating defendants' procedural rights due to ineffective summons verification under HIR Articles 126-129. This study aims to analyze how verstek potentially breaches audi alteram partem and due process principles while identifying normative gaps enabling plaintiff abuse. Employing a juridical-normative approach with library research, the population comprises civil procedure regulations (HIR, Rv, UU No. 48/2009), Supreme Court decisions, and recent literature (2021-2025); purposive sampling selects relevant primary and secondary legal materials. The researcher serves as the key instrument, utilizing doctrinal, grammatical, systematic, and thematic analysis techniques. Findings reveal ambiguities in "valid summons" definitions, weak verification mechanisms, and absent sanctions, leading to procedurally flawed judgments that undermine fairness. In conclusion, verstek requires reform via RUU KUHAPerdata to mandate tracked notifications and stricter safeguards, balancing efficiency with justice.
Dinamika Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Perdata Yang Telah Memiliki Kekuatan Hukum Tetap Meiddy Dwi Darmawan; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i3.5792

Abstract

Civil court decisions that have obtained permanent legal force in Indonesia often fail to be executed effectively, creating a gap between normative legal certainty and practical implementation. This study aims to analyze juridical and non juridical obstacles to the execution of civil judgments and to formulate an ideal legal construction that strengthens procedural certainty and institutional accountability. The research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and limited case approaches, with a population consisting of all regulations, court policies, and scholarly works on civil judgment execution in Indonesia. Samples of legal materials are selected purposively based on their relevance to juridical and non juridical barriers and to the design of an ideal execution model. Data are collected through systematic literature study and analyzed using content analysis and qualitative prescriptive techniques to categorize norms, doctrines, and empirical findings into coherent analytical themes. The results show that weaknesses in procedural regulation, unclear operative parts of judgments, lack of asset tracing mechanisms, social resistance, limited court resources, and weak inter agency coordination jointly undermine the effectiveness of execution. The conclusion is that a reformed execution system requires simultaneous normative, institutional, and socio cultural reforms anchored in a five element conceptual model: executable judgment, procedural certainty, institutional safeguard, social compliance, and judicial accountability.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak Dalam Proses Verzet Terhadap Putusan Verstek Eliza Yuniar; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i3.5793

Abstract

This study is motivated by the need to ensure balanced legal protection for parties involved in verzet processes against verstek decisions within civil procedural law, especially amid the digitization of the judiciary. The objective is to analyze the legal position of the parties and evaluate the effectiveness of the verzet mechanism in guaranteeing proportional legal protection. The research adopts a normative juridical type with a literature review method. The population comprises legislation, procedural law doctrines, and court decisions relevant to verzet and verstek in Indonesia. Selected samples are purposive documents based on relevance. Data instruments include primary and secondary legal documents analyzed using qualitative descriptive techniques through comparative and synthetic textual analysis. The findings reveal verzet as a crucial instrument to protect defendants’ rights; however, its effectiveness remains constrained by administrative and technical challenges in notification and electronic court system implementation. The conclusion emphasizes the need for procedural law reform, improved human resource capacity, and technological infrastructure to enhance verzet’s functionality in the future.
URGENSI KODE ETIK DIGITAL BAGI ADVOKAT DALAM SISTEM E-LITIGATION PERDATA Suryajaya Hakim; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v6i1.6534

Abstract

Perkembangan e-litigation perdata di Indonesia menimbulkan tantangan etika baru bagi advokat terkait perlindungan data, keamanan dokumen elektronik, dan komunikasi daring, sementara kode etik konvensional belum memadai. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis urgensi kode etik digital bagi advokat dalam e-litigation perdata. Menggunakan pendekatan hukum normatif dengan studi literatur, populasi mencakup norma hukum, regulasi e-court, dan literatur 2020-2025, sampel purposif 50+ dokumen relevan. Instrumen studi literatur primer-sekunder-tersier dianalisis kualitatif deskriptif deduktif. Hasil menunjukkan keterbatasan kode etik konvensional menghadapi risiko siber dan ketidakpastian hukum, sehingga kode etik digital mendesak untuk melindungi klien dan integritas profesi. Kesimpulan merekomendasikan sinergi organisasi advokat-Mahkamah Agung menyusun kode etik digital dengan pelatihan wajib.
KONVERGENSI HUKUM ACARA PERDATA DAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI: MENUJU TATA LAKSANA PERADILAN BERBASIS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) (MENGKAJI KEMUNGKINAN PENERAPAN AI DALAM PROSES ADMINISTRASI DAN PEMBUKTIAN PERDATA Intan Nazili; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v6i1.6785

Abstract

Integrasi Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) ke dalam sistem hukum acara perdata mengatasi ketidakefisienan administrasi perkara dan pemrosesan bukti di pengadilan Indonesia, di mana proses manual menyebabkan keterlambatan dan biaya tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji aplikasi AI dalam administrasi dan pembuktian perdata, dengan studi kasus internasional. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif berbasis yuridis normatif, populasi terdiri dari literatur 2021-2025 tentang AI dalam peradilan perdata, disampel secara purposif menjadi 25-30 sumber terpercaya melalui Google Scholar. Instrumen meliputi dokumen hukum dan jurnal terindeks, dianalisis melalui pengkodean tematik, interpretasi normatif, dan sintesis komparatif dengan triangulasi sumber. Hasil menunjukkan potensi AI meningkatkan efisiensi 50%, mengurangi biaya operasional, dan meminimalkan bias manusia melalui otomatisasi pengelolaan data dan analisis bukti elektronik, seperti di Estonia dan Singapura. Kesimpulannya, Indonesia memerlukan regulasi AI khusus, peningkatan infrastruktur, dan pelatihan yudisial untuk mewujudkan manfaat ini sambil mengatasi tantangan etika dan privasi.
Kajian Yuridis terhadap Asas Itikad Baik dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Perdata Faiqotul, Fina; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7651

Abstract

The enforcement of civil court judgments in Indonesia frequently encounters obstacles due to parties’ bad faith conduct, such as covert asset transfers or groundless resistance to execution. Although the principle of good faith is a foundational tenet in civil law, its application in the enforcement phase remains inconsistent. This study examines the concept and legal status of the good faith principle in Indonesian positive law concerning civil judgment enforcement and analyzes the legal consequences of its violation. A normative juridical method is employed, utilizing library-based research on primary and secondary legal sources. The findings reveal that while good faith is recognized in substantive civil law, it has not been explicitly incorporated into civil procedural law. Consequently, bad faith actions during enforcement rarely incur clear procedural sanctions. Theoretically, this underscores the need to integrate ethical principles into civil procedure doctrine; practically, it calls for regulatory reforms to embed good faith as a binding procedural obligation in judgment enforcement.
Analisis Kebutuhan Hukum terhadap Pengesahan RUU Perampasan Aset sebagai Instrumen Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia Anggraini, Arsilia Suci Hamid; Wiraguna, Sidi Ahyar
Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 6 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin (Februari - Maret 2026)
Publisher : Green Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jim.v4i6.1645

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji kebutuhan hukum terhadap pengesahan Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset sebagai instrumen pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. Objek penelitian adalah urgensi mekanisme perampasan aset tanpa putusan pidana melalui pendekatan pembuktian terhadap harta. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menilai kesesuaian mekanisme tersebut dengan asas hukum, khususnya asas praduga tidak bersalah dan perlindungan hak milik, serta menilai kebutuhan sosial dan institusional terhadap pembentukan regulasi baru. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, yang diperkuat data empiris berupa diskursus publik dan forum lembaga negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perampasan aset tidak bertentangan dengan asas praduga tidak bersalah apabila diperlakukan sebagai tindakan terhadap objek dan disertai pembuktian berlapis serta pengawasan peradilan. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa rancangan undang-undang ini merupakan kebutuhan mendesak untuk memperkuat pemulihan aset dan menutup kekosongan hukum dalam pemberantasan korupsi.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Platform Pinjaman Online terhadap Penyalahgunaan dan Penyebaran Data Pribadi Konsumen secara Ilegal Naswa Fiolla Anggraini; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
RISOMA : Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Mei: RISOMA : Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan
Publisher : Asosiasi Ilmuwan Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Humaniora Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/risoma.v3i3.767

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal responsibilities that can be imposed on online lending platform organizers for the misuse and illegal distribution of consumer personal data. With the rapid development of the online lending industry, the issue of protecting consumer personal data has become a very important issue. Misuse of personal data can have serious impacts on consumers, including identity theft and financial loss. Therefore, this study examines the forms of legal responsibilities that can be applied, such as administrative, criminal, and civil responsibilities, as well as the obstacles faced in their implementation. This study uses a normative approach with an analysis of applicable regulations, namely the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP), the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), and other related regulations. Data were obtained through a literature review covering relevant laws and regulations, journals, articles, and case studies. The results of the study indicate that online lending platform organizers can be subject to three forms of legal responsibilities. Administrative responsibilities include sanctions imposed by supervisory authorities such as the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and the Personal Data Protection Agency (BPDP). Criminal responsibilities can be in the form of imprisonment and fines for those who violate provisions related to personal data protection. Civil liability gives consumers the right to file a lawsuit for losses caused by a breach of their personal data. This study also identified various obstacles in implementing legal liability, such as lack of awareness of organizers, difficulties in supervision, and legal loopholes in user agreements.
Analisis Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi: Implikasi Putusan terhadap Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia Alarode Lahoya Simbolon; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
RISOMA : Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Mei: RISOMA : Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan
Publisher : Asosiasi Ilmuwan Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Humaniora Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/risoma.v3i3.770

Abstract

The Constitutional Court of Indonesia is a judicial institution with the authority to review laws against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, resolve disputes between state institutions, decide on the dissolution of political parties, and adjudicate election result disputes. In exercising its authority, the Constitutional Court functions not only as the guardian of the constitution but also as a protector of human rights. This article aims to analyze how the procedural law of the Constitutional Court, as regulated under Law Number 24 of 2003 and its amendments, serves as a crucial instrument to ensure fair, transparent, and accountable proceedings in cases involving constitutional rights. This study adopts a normative juridical approach by examining legislation, legal doctrines, and Constitutional Court decisions that have had a significant impact on the protection of human rights. The analysis reveals that several rulings of the Court have expanded interpretations of human rights, although challenges remain regarding the consistency of procedural application and the effectiveness of decision enforcement. Therefore, strengthening the procedural law of the Constitutional Court is essential for ensuring the substantive and sustainable protection of human rights in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Achmad Edi Subiyanto Ade Hari Siswanto Adiman, Adiman Adzaky Luthfi Radiant Ahmad Redi Akmalia Salsabila Al Satria Diah Alamsyah, Rizki Alarode Lahoya Simbolon Alfiana, Rita Alvarindo, Arif Anatomi Muliawan Anesya Fritiana Anggraini, Arsilia Suci Hamid Anisyah Sutopo, Hanan Anita Anita Anna Triningsih Annisa Fitria Antika Gestia Ardelia, Sekar Galuh Arifatunnisa, Shifa Arkaan Daffa Astri Anggraeni Putri Athaya Alghaniyyu Rahmatulloh Atmojo, Talitha Maheswari Ning AYU WULANDARI Azis, Rizka Amelia Aziz, Rizka Amelia Barthos, Megawati Bella Fistya Asherli Berto Purnomo Sidik Daishahwa Daishahwa, Daishahwa Darman, Melani Delvi Eka Ariyanti Devi Wulandari Dharma, Dhiva Aurora Pramhesta Edward, Ryan Fransisco Effendy, D. Andry Eirene, Chresto Elda Septi Darmayanti Elda Septi Darmayanti Eliza Yuniar Elvina Putri Maheswari Faiqotul, Fina Faisal Santiago Faisal Santiago, Faisal Fakrulloh, Zudan Arief Farha Nadiah Feriza, Gousta Fika Nurmajulia Andiani Fika Nurmajulia Andiani Filal Khair Fitri, Gischa Adelia Fransisca Elia Merry Paskah Mangunsong Fritiana, Anesya Galuh Candra Utami Harahap, Pardamaian Hartanto, Annisa Ramadhani Henry Arianto Hikmawati, Elok Hutapea, Annisa Nurmalasari I Gede Hartadi Kurniawan I Made Kanthika Intan Nazili Irdanuraprida, Irdanuraprida Irmanjaya Thaher Ismaya Rahailia Nasution Juanda Juanda Kantikha, I Made Khetrina Maria Angnesia Kusnadi, Kusuma Daniel L. M. F. Purwanto L.M.F Purwanto L.M.F Purwanto L.M.F. Purwanto Lenatia, Lenatia Lengkong, Ivany Lianto, Fermanto Mangunsong, Fransisca Elia Merry Paskah Maryanih Meiddy Dwi Darmawan Mochamad Yulian Fadhli Saputra Mugiono Mugiono, Mugiono Nadiroh, Aenun Namira, Amanda Jihan Naswa Fiolla Anggraini Naya Indah Sahqia Nayla Azzahra Khaerunnisa Nazarudin Khuluk Nova Reana Wahida Nufus, Hayattun Nugraha, Karindra Alvian Nurhayani nurhayani Nurmala, Salma Ayu Pardamean Harahap Pedo, Brandi Stefano Pratama, Muhamad Noval Faris Priscila, Michel Purwanti, Yani Purwanto, L.M.F Putri, Ramadani Rahmadani, Nita Octaviana Reysha Aurelia Shabilla Rosalia Eka Kurnia Nurcahyani Santoso, Alisya Putri Savana Maulia Shafa Salsabila Sri Mulyati Sulaiman, Abdullah Sultan Reza Islami Suprajogi, Agus Suryajaya Hakim Syifa Ramadani Talitha Kamilah Theo Prapaskah Verina Dwi Muryani Wardhani, Dwi Kusumo Wasis Susetio Widiatno, Men Wih Winda Agustina Wyanda Kinanti Syauqi Ramadhani Yaffa Ivana Faustina Yunesia Amelia Renanta Yunita Sari, Kamelia Zudan Arief Fakrulloh Zulfikar Judge