Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.563
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal COPE Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Publikasi Pendidikan Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Elemen International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Proceedings Education and Language International Conference Union: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Wacana Akademika : Majalah Ilmiah Kependidikan Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika KACANEGARA Jurnal Pengabdian pada Masyarakat Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika Surya Abdimas Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM) Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan Abdimas Galuh: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal (Birle Journal) Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIn) Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan International Journal on Education Insight Prosiding SNPBS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi dan Saintek) Pancaran Pendidikan Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya INCOME: Indonesian Journal of Community Service and Engagement Jurnal Tatsqif Hipotenusa: Journal of Mathematical Society Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Mathematics Education Journal Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan Mathema: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Didaktik Matematika International Journal of Review in Mathematics Education Pedagogy Review
Imam Sujadi
Universitas Sebelas Maret
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 61 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 61 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
PERSEPSI DAN PEMAKNAAN GURU TENTANG STANDAR PROSES DAN STANDAR PENILAIAN PENDIDIKAN Alfarisy Totalia, Salman; Imam Sujadi; Aniek Hindrayani; Susantiningrum; Sigit Wahyudi
Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan Vol 16 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Standar dan Kebijakan Pendidikan, BSKAP, Kemendikbudristek

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24832/jpkp.v16i2.726

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan persepsi guru tentang 1) pemahaman dan penerapan Standar Proses; dan 2) pemahaman dan penerapan Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui diskusi kelompok terpumpun. Analisis data menerapkan model analisis interaktif Milles dan Huberman. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 1) semua guru telah mengetahui dan membaca peraturan baru tentang Standar Proses, namun demikian hanya sebagian kecil yang memahami isinya, bahkan mayoritas belum melaksanakan evaluasi prosespembelajaran; 2) semua guru telah mengetahui dan membaca peraturan baru tentang Standar Penilaian, namun sebagian besar guru belum mampu mengimplementasikan Standar Penilaian Pendidikan dan penilaian capaian pembelajaran (formatif dan sumatif) dengan baik. Mengacu hasil tersebut disarankan untuk dilakukan program pendampinganyang terstruktur dan intensif bagi guru agar diperoleh standardisasi pemahaman Standar Proses dan Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Dengan demikian diharapkan pelaksanaan proses pembelajaran dan penilaian capaian pembelajaran dapat dilakukan dengan benar dan tepat sasaran.
PERSEPSI DAN PEMAKNAAN GURU TENTANG STANDAR PROSES DAN STANDAR PENILAIAN PENDIDIKAN Alfarisy Totalia, Salman; Imam Sujadi; Aniek Hindrayani; Susantiningrum; Sigit Wahyudi
Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan Vol 16 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Standar dan Kebijakan Pendidikan, BSKAP, Kemendikbudristek

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24832/jpkp.v16i2.726

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan persepsi guru tentang 1) pemahaman dan penerapan Standar Proses; dan 2) pemahaman dan penerapan Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui diskusi kelompok terpumpun. Analisis data menerapkan model analisis interaktif Milles dan Huberman. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 1) semua guru telah mengetahui dan membaca peraturan baru tentang Standar Proses, namun demikian hanya sebagian kecil yang memahami isinya, bahkan mayoritas belum melaksanakan evaluasi prosespembelajaran; 2) semua guru telah mengetahui dan membaca peraturan baru tentang Standar Penilaian, namun sebagian besar guru belum mampu mengimplementasikan Standar Penilaian Pendidikan dan penilaian capaian pembelajaran (formatif dan sumatif) dengan baik. Mengacu hasil tersebut disarankan untuk dilakukan program pendampinganyang terstruktur dan intensif bagi guru agar diperoleh standardisasi pemahaman Standar Proses dan Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Dengan demikian diharapkan pelaksanaan proses pembelajaran dan penilaian capaian pembelajaran dapat dilakukan dengan benar dan tepat sasaran.
Analisis Bibliometrik : Fokus Penelitian Geometri Pada Pembelajaran Matematika di Indonesia (2017 -2023) Iffah, Rona Dhiya Layli; Ningrum , Sri Adiningsih Utami; Sujadi , Imam
Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29407/jmen.v10i2.22016

Abstract

Geometry is one of the contents that students must master during the math learning process, so research on this topic is widely done. This study aims to determine the trend of geometry research research themes that can be used as research topics in the future. This study uses bibliometric analysis, which uses a maximum limit of 200 articles throughout 2017-2023, google scholar is used to search data with geometry keywords through Harzing's Publish or Perish program, then narrowed down to get 171 articles. The results of this study indicate that the trend of publications with geometry research themes has increased in 2018 - 2019. While the theme of geometry research topics that have the opportunity to be used as research in the future there are two keywords namely LKPD and exploration.
Pengaruh Karakteristik Berpikir terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa SMP Priyogo, Adi; Riyadi, R; Sujadi, Imam
Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya 2018: Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1107.818 KB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan pengaruh karakteristik berpikir terhadap prestasi belajar matematika. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VII SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Surakarta yang terdiri dari 6 kelas dengan jumlah keseluruhan 178 siswa dan diambil sampel untuk penelitian dengan jumlah 114 orang. Data diperoleh dari angket dan nilai prestasi belajar siswa. Angket dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari butir-butir pertanyaan dari karakteristik berpikir. Analisis data hasil penelitian dilakukan analisis vasiansi satu jalan sel tak sama dengan menggunakan SPSS 16.0. Hasil penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa hasil pengujian F hitung > F tabel maka Ho ditolak, sehingga hipotesis (Ha) menyatakan terdapat pengaruh karakteristik berpikir terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa kelas VII SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Surakarta. Adapun kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah prestasi belajar matematika siswa dengan karakteristik berpikir tipe SA lebih baik daripada siswa dengan karakteristik berpikir tipe SK, siswa tipe AK, maupun siswa tipe AA, prestasi belajar matematika siswa dengan karakteristik berpikir tipe SK sama baiknya dibandingkarakteristik berpikir tipe AK maupun siswa tipe AA, sedangkan karakteristik berpikir tipe AK sama baiknya dibanding karakteristik berpikir tipe AA pada kelas VII SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Surakarta.
Proses Berpikir Kreatif dalam Pengajuan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI-AP4 SMK Negeri 2 Madiun Tahun Pelajaran 2016/2017 Ningsih, Maya Kristina; Sujadi, Imam; Subanti, Sri
Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya 2017: Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (491.546 KB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses berpikir kreatif siswa kelas XI AP-4 SMK Negeri 2 Madiun yang mempunyai motivasi belajar tinggi dan sedang dalam pengajuan masalah matematika. Pengambilan subjek penelitian dilakukan secara purposive sampling. Berdasarkan skor akhir angket motivasi belajar siswa diambil tiga siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi, dan tiga siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar sedang. Selanjutnya subjek terpilih diberikan tes pengajuan masalah matematika (TPMM) untuk mengetahui proses berpikir kreatif siswa dalam mengajukan masalah matematika. Teknik keabsahan data dalam penelitian ini digunakan triangulasi waktu. Teknik analisis data dalam penelitian ini diawali dengan melakukan pengumpulan data dari TPMM dan wawancara dengan subjek penelitian kemudian menyusun deskripsi pengajuan masalah matematika siswa dalam bentuk uraian singkat. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah: siswa dengan motivasi belajar tinggi mampu mengajukan masalah hanya dengan membaca sekali petunjuk dan informasi yang diberikan. Kemudian menuliskan masalah tersebut pada lembar jawab dan menjelaskan prosedur penyelesaian masalah yang diajukan serta menyelesaikan pemecahan masalah tersebut. Siswa dengan motivasi belajar sedang perlu membaca kembali petunjuk dan informasi yang diberikan supaya dapat mengajukan masalah. . Siswa terlihat kurang tenang dan dalam menuliskan masalah yang diajukan beberapa kali terdiam. Kemudian menjelaskan prosedur penyelesaian masalah dan menyelesaian pemecahan masalah tersebut pada lembar jawab.
The Abilities of Junior High School Students in Solving PISA-Like Mathematical Problems on Uncertainty and Data Contents Sujadi, Imam; Budiyono; Kurniawati, Ira; Wulandari, Arum Nur; Andriatna, Riki; Puteri, Hanifa Alifia
Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): April
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jppp.v7i1.51931

Abstract

Indonesia's participation in PISA is less satisfactory, particularly in mathematics. Uncertainty and data are two of the PISA content areas being evaluated. Therefore the aim of this study is to analyze students' abilities to solve mathematical problems such as PISA on uncertainty and data content to map student readiness for PISA. This study is kind of qualitative study used a case study design. The sample in this study was 84 students of grade IX junior high school who were selected with a simple random sampling technique. The data collection method employs both test and non-test instruments. The data analysis technique used in this study consist of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion and verification. The results showed that 689 students scored out of 1344, representing 51.41%. These results show that students' ability to solve math problems such as PISA on uncertainty and data content is in the moderate category. While each material, namely statistics and opportunities, is in the high and low categories. This condition is based on learning that has yet to lead students to contextual problems. With these results, it is hoped that there will be efforts to improve the learning process by involving problems such as PISA as habituation.
Description of Assessment: Assessment for Learning and Assessment as Learning on Teacher Learning Assessment Hidayat, Rahmad; Sujadi, Imam; Siswanto; Usodo, Budi
Journal of Education Reseach and Evaluation Vol 7 No 4 (2023): November
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jere.v7i4.59950

Abstract

Assessment becomes a self-developing learning instruction and requires a broader focus on feedback interventions, especially learners' responses to feedback and the learning environment in which feedback works. Study of the ability of teachers to reflect on the application of assessment in the learning process in the classroom. The purpose of this study is to analyze Assessment for Learning (AfL) and Assessment as Learning (AaL) in the learning process in the classroom. The research method used is a qualitative research method using an in-depth, focused interview. Data collection techniques in the form of reflective are analyzed using reduction analysis, presentation, and drawing conclusions from the data. The results of the interviews show that assessment is often used as a measure of learning success alone, without regard to the application of constructive feedback to help students improve their achievement competencies in mathematics learning. Assessment is still focused on giving grades or rankings that can result in competition between students, so they have not focused on improving the learning process. It gives stakeholders a clear and unified picture of how educational assessments relate to learning and can help educators assist and design assessment practices. The construct of Assessment for Learning (AfL) and Assessment as Learning (AaL) must be looked at consistently with each other to build an assessment culture that maximizes student learning.  
Pelatihan Pemanfaatan Laboratorium Virtual PhET Colorado dan Mathigon Untuk Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah Menengah Pertama Sujadi, Imam; Andriatna, Riki; Kurniawati, Ira; Wulandari, Arum Nur; Nursanti, Yuli Bangun
Surya Abdimas Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37729/abdimas.v9i2.5695

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi untuk pembelajaran matematika berkembang dengan pesat. Salah satunya adalah laboratorium virtual yang dapat dimanfaatkan sebagai media pembelajaran matematika. Namun demikian, pemanfaatan laboratorium virtual dalam pembelajaran matematika belum optimal, bahkan beberapa guru matematika belum mengetahui bagaimana penerapan laboratorium virtual dalam pembelajaran matematika. Untuk itu, kegiatan pengabdian ini bertujuan untuk melatih guru matematika SMP di kota Surakarta untuk dapat memanfaatkan laboratorium virtual, yaitu aplikasi PhET Colorado dan Mathigon dalam pembelajaran matematika. Kegiatan pengabdian dilakukan dengan metode pendampingan teknis kepada guru untuk dapat menyusun modul ajar yang terintegrasi dengan laboratorium virtual. Hasil pelatihan menunjukkan bahwa guru sudah dapat menyusun modul ajar yang terintegrasi dengan laboratorium virtual PhET Colorado atau Mathigon pada suatu topik matematika tertentu. Selain itu, berdasarkan hasil kuesioner yang diberikan kepada guru menunjukkan persepsi yang positif terhadap kegiatan pelatihan termasuk juga terhadap penggunaan laboratorium virtual dalam pembelajaran matematika. Namun demikian, guru juga memberikan pandangannya terhadap kesiapan sarana dan prasarana yang dibutuhkan untuk dapat memanfaatkan laboratium virtual.
Eksperimentasi Pembelajaran Matematika Menggunakan Model Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions (Stad) dan Think-Pair-Share (Tps) pada Materi Pokok Persamaan Garis Lurus Ditinjau dari Kreativitas Siswa Edy Suprapto; Imam Sujadi; Mania Roswitha
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 4 No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan
Publisher : LPPM Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract:This research aims to know the difference of influlence in learning models, creativity, andits interaction toward student’s learning achievement on the subject matter: equations ofa straight line. This research is a quasi experimental research with factorial design of3x3. The population is eight grade students of Junior high School in Madiun. The samplesare taken using stratified cluster random technic. Sample of the research is 283 students.The collecting data instruments is a questionnaire on creativity and learning mathematicsachievement test. The trial test of instrument of the questionnaire includes the contentvalidity, the internal consistency, and realibility. The trial test on the achievement oflearning on mathematics includes the content validity, the difficulty level, thediscrimination power, and realibility coefficient. The Data analysis technique usedconsists of: balance, precondition analysis (Normality and Homogenity). Hypothesisanalysis test uses two-ways variant analysis with different cells.The results of the research are: (1) The students who are learning withcooperative model of STAD have better achievement than the students who are givenconventional learning, and the students who are given cooperative model of STAD havethe same achievement with the students who are given cooperative model of TPS; (2) Thestudents with high creativity have better achievement than the students who have lowercreativity (middle and low), the students with middle creativity have the sameachievement with the students who have low creativity, (3) On students with highcreativity, implementation learning models of STAD, TPS, and conventional give thesame effect; On students with middle creativity, implementation of cooperative learningwith STAD model gives the same effect as good as the TPS model, implementation ofcooperative learning with STAD models provides a better effect than conventionallearning, and implementation of cooperative learning with TPS model gives a bettereffect than conventional learning; On students with low creativity, implementation ofcooperative learning with STAD and TPS models give the same effect, implementation ofcooperative learning with STAD model and conventional learning also provide the sameeffect, and implementation of cooperative learning with TPS model gives a better effectthan conventional learning.
The emergent role of artificial intelligence in Mathematics education: Examining students’ acceptance and perception Nursanti, Yuli Bangun; Sujadi, Imam; Kurniawati, Ira; Andriatna, Riki; Wulandari, Arum Nur
Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): July-December 2025
Publisher : UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/jemin.v5i2.11242

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into education, offering new opportunities for enhancing learning, especially in challenging subjects like mathematics. However, there is limited research on how students perceive and accept AI in mathematics education, particularly in the context of Indonesian higher education. This study aims to explore mathematics education students’ acceptance and perceptions of AI tools in enhancing their learning experience. Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, the study employed a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire for quantitative data and in-depth semi-structured interviews to gather qualitative insights. The participants were 389 mathematic students from several universities in Surakarta municipality, Indonesia based on non-probability sampling technique through sampling quota. The results show that students generally perceive AI as useful and easy to use, with high scores for Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Ease of Use (PEU). AI was appreciated for its ability to provide personalized learning, immediate feedback, and flexibility. However, students' Behavioral Intention to Use (BIU) AI was lower, indicating hesitation toward integrating AI regularly into their learning routines. The findings highlight that while AI has the potential to enhance learning, students still value traditional face-to-face interactions with instructors and are concerned about over-reliance on technology. The study contributes to theoretical framework that AI tools should complement, not replace, traditional teaching methods. Practically, the integration of AI in education should be gradual, with adequate support for both students and instructors. Future research should explore long-term adoption and investigate the role of educational policies in supporting AI integration.
Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Abdul Aziz Adi Wahyu Kuncara Agus Darmawan Agus Margono Agus Margono Agus Setiawan Agus Setiawan Ahmad Abdul Mutholib Ahmad Husni Mubarok Ajeng Novalin Wija Pratiwi Ajeng Novalin Wija Pratiwi Aji Permana Putra Andriawan Nurcahyo, Andriawan Aniek Hindrayani Anita Dewi Utami Annur, M. Firman Ariastutik, Endah Ariastutik, Endah Arisjanti, Nova Ayu Arum Nur Wulandari Arum Nur Wulandari Asip Cakra Buana Asip Cakra Buana, Asip Cakra Aulia Nurmalitasari Awalia, Kurnia Bambang Sugaiarto Budi Usodo BUDIYONO Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Burhan Mustaqim Chrisnawati, Henny Ekana Dalud Daeka Damayanti, Elok Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Dian Aulia Citra Kusuma Dian Devita Yohanie Yohanie Dian Fitri Argarini, Dian Fitri Diari Indriati Djoko Adi Susilo Dona Dinda Pratiwi Dwi Retnowati Dwi Retnowati Dwiani Listya Kartika Dwiani Listya Kartika, Dwiani Listya Dyah Ratri Aryuna Edy Suprapto Edy Suprapto Elywati Elywati Elywati Elywati Endah Asmarawati, Endah ERLAN SISWANDI Etika, Erdyna Dwi Eva Tri Wahyuni Eva Tri Wahyuni Exacta, Annisa Prima Faizah, Farah Farida Nurhasanah Fatkhunur Fariza Rahmadiansyah Fauzi Mulyatna Fawaida, Atina Fengky Adie Perdana Ferdiani, Rosita Dwi Fitri Andika Nurussafa’at, Fitri Andika Fitri Andika Nurussafa’at Fitria, Camelina Fransiskus Xaverius Agus Siswanto Fransiskus Xaverius Agus Siswanto, Fransiskus Xaverius Frasetyana, Anita Diah Frasetyana, Anita Diah Fredi Ganda Putra Getut Pramesti Habib Ratu Perwira Negara Habib Ratu Perwira Negara Habibi Ratu Perwira Negara Hadi Prayitno, Hadi Hanafiah, Anis Hanafiah, Anis Hanifa Alifia Puteri Hanifa Alifia Puteri Hanifa Alifia Puteri Hanifa Puteri Hartono Hartono Hartono Hartono Hasan S Negara Hasan S Negara Hendriyanto, Agus Hidayah, Muhlishotul Hirtanto Hirtanto Hirtanto Hirtanto, Hirtanto Ibrahim . Iffah, Rona Dhiya Layli Ikrar Pramudya Ikrar Pramudya, Ikrar Imam Pakhrurrozi, Imam Imam Wijaya, Henry Putra Indra Kurniawan Indra Kurniawan Ira Kurniawati Ira Kurniawati Ira, Ira Kurniawati Isnandar Slamet Isnandar Slamet, Isnandar Janah, Rahmawati Fatkhul Juwita Rini K, Tri Atmojo Kanya Barndt Kharisma Ardhy W Khayati, Fitrotul Khoiriyah, Nor Kintoko Kintoko KOMARUDIN Komarudin Komarudin Krida Singgih Kuncoro Kuncara, Adi Wahyu Kurnia Awalia Kurniasih, Rini Kurniasih, Rini Kurniawati, Cici Kurniawati, Ira Kurniawati, Rina Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kuswardi, Yemi Kuswardi, Yemi Laila Fitriana Laila Fitriana Laksono Trisnantoro Luthfiana Mirati, Luthfiana Malikhah, Siti Mania Roswitha Mania Roswitha Mania Roswitha Mania Roswitha Marcelina, Thea Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardodo Mardodo Mardodo Mardodo Maulia, Dityana Mila Metikasari, Shinta Molinasari, Nitha Monika Agnes Henny Kinanti Mubarok, Ahmad Husni Muh. Zuhair Zahid Muhammad Zuhair Zahid, Muhammad Zuhair Muhlishotul Hidayah Muhtarom Muhtarom Muhtarom Muhtarom, Muhtarom Ningrum , Sri Adiningsih Utami Ningsih, Maya Kristina Nirawati, Lia Septy Nirawati, Lia Septy Nor Khoiriyah Nova Ayu Arisjanti Novi Dya Meylasari Novita, Aresti Nugroho Arif Sudibyo Nuraini Muhassanah Nuraini, Latifah Nurmalitasari Nurmalitasari Nurmalitasari Nurmalitasari Nurrahmawati Nurrahmawati Nurrahmawati, Nurrahmawati Nursanti, Yuli Bangun Nurul Amalia K W Nurul Amalia K W Nurul Hidayati Shaliha, Nurul Hidayati Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi Pangadi, Pangadi Pasaribu, Rita Rupiani Perwira, Nurul Yudha Pramesti, Getut Pramesti, Getut Pramudya, Ikrar Pratiwi, Yulian Adhi Priyogo, Adi Purjiyo Purjiyo Puspitasari, Norma Puspitasari, Norma Puteri, Hanifa Alifia Putri, Amellia Putri, Astiwi Comastika Rahmadiansyah, Fatkhunur Fariza Rahmawati Masruroh Rahmawati Masruroh, Rahmawati Retno Sari Ria Wahyu Wijayanti Riki Andriatna Rima Aksen Cahdriyana Rima Aksen Cahdriyana Rina Agustina Rina Agustina Rina Kurniawati Riyadi Riyadi Rofiah, Faizatur Rubono Setiawan Salman Alfarisy Totalia, Salman Salsabila, Unik Hanifah Samsul Maarif Sari, Retno Sarwanto Sarwanto Selvi Marcellia Setiawan Wicaksono Sigit Wahyudi Siswanto Siti Khoiriyah Siti Khoiriyah Siti Komsatun Siti Suprihatiningsih Soeyono Soeyono Soeyono, Soeyono Sri Adi Widodo Sri Adi Widodo Sri Subanti Sriyati, Sriyati Suharyanto Suharyanto Sukamto, Ika Sumiyarsi Sukarmin Sukowiyono Sukowiyono Sukowiyono Sukowiyono Sulaiman Sulaiman Suprapto Suprapto Susantiningrum Tajuddin, Annas Tasyah Tarmo Tarmo Tarmo, Tarmo Tata Rahmasari Tika Karlina R Tri Atmojo K Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Yuliana Triana Harmini Trisnawati, Dwi Inayah Tsaqifah, Sofi Tunggu Biyarti Tyas, Wahyu Handining Ulfa Masamah Ulfa Masamah, Ulfa Ulfa, Nur Fitriyana Vera Dewi Susanti Wahyu Nofiansyah Wahyu Nofiansyah, Wahyu Wahyuni, Fina Tri Wahyuni, Fina Tri Warifdah, Yumna Wicaksono, Setiawan Widodo Widodo Widodo, An Nur Ami Widodo, An Nur Ami Wulandari, Arum Nur Wulandari, Asih Yandika Nugraha Yudi Darma Yuli Bangun Nursanti Yuli Bangun Nursanti Yuli Bangun Nursanti Yuliana, Tri Zainnur Wijayaanto Zamroni Zamroni Zamroni Zamroni Zulaikah, Siti Zulfa, Faradina Nilam