p-Index From 2021 - 2026
11.376
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Spektrum Hukum Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Rechtsidee Gorontalo Law Review Jurnal Yuridis Veteran Law Review Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni SABDAMAS JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Esensi Hukum Jurnal Suara Hukum Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences International Journal of Social Service and Research Jurnal Nasional Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Law Development Journal Jurnal Impresi Indonesia International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Journal Evidence Of Law Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Ekonomi, Teknologi dan Bisnis Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal RechtIdee Majority Science Journal Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Intellektika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ardhi: Jurnal Pengabdian dalam Negri Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia Sosial Simbiosis: Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) ARIMA : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora Law & Pass : International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora International Journal Of Public Health International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice International Journal of Sociology and Law Kolaborasi: Jurnal Hasil Kegiatan Kolaborasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum Statuta International Journal of Society and Law Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Journal of Contemporary Business Law & Technology: Cyber Law, Blockchain, and Legal Innovations KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara Lentera Negeri Journal of Law Perspectives Review
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Literatur Review: Hak dan Kewajiban Pasien, Keluarga Masyarkat dan Tenaga Medis dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan Bencana Jaury Douglas Pardomuan; Handoyo Prasetyo
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024): September: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i5.384

Abstract

Health services are a critical aspect that requires coordination and cooperation from various parties, including patients, families, communities and medical personnel. Therefore, this research aims to analyze the rights and obligations of patients, families, communities and medical personnel in disaster health services. The method used is literature study. Google and Google Schoolar are used as the main sources of the database used from 2020 to 2024 to extract research via publish or perish software. From the research that has been conducted, disaster health services are a very complex and challenging aspect of the health system, which requires a multi-disciplinary and collaborative approach. A deep understanding of the rights and obligations of patients, families, communities and medical personnel is a strong basis for building a health care system that is fair, effective and sustainable. Cooperation between governments, international organizations, non-governmental organizations, local communities and individuals is essential to ensure that disaster response and recovery efforts can be carried out in a coordinated and effective manner. The development of supportive policies and regulations, as well as adequate funding, are also critical to strengthening disaster health services.
Penegakan Hukum Perlindungan Izin Usaha dalam Media Elektronik terhadap Pelanggaran Pidana Perizinan di Indonesia Khoyron Nasir, Tomi; Prasetyo, Handoyo
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v3i3.888

Abstract

In order to maintain a healthy investment climate competition, the Indonesian Government issued its legal product in the form of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 concerning Electronic Integrated Business Licensing Services aimed at enforcing business establishment permits and increasing the increase in the business licensing acceleration index in Indonesia. This article research is a normative legal research. The research aperaturan pemerintahroach method uses the legislative aperaturan pemerintahroach and case aperaturan pemerintahroach to examine the legal problems of the business license. The data source for writing this article comes from a literature study whose sources come from books, papers, and journals related to business licensing law in Indonesia. In writing this article, the author discusses how the legal regulation of licensing law and its solution are related to criminal acts related to violations of business licensing in electronic media in Indonesia nation. The results of this study explain that business activities whose operations in electronic media do not follow the legal regulations of business licensing in Indonesia, then the company can be sanctioned, its license revoked and cannot function properly and comprehensively in its operations in the territory of Indonesia.
Pengaturan Undang-Undang Darurat Nomor 7 Tahun 1955 dalam Rangka Pemberantasan Kejahatan Ekonomi di Indonesia Afdhali, Dino Rizka; Prasetyo, Handoyo
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v3i3.895

Abstract

Economic crime is a new dimension of crime, the perpetrators of which consist of wealthy, intellectual and organized groups. Economic crime is also called white collar crime. Another characteristic of this crime is seen from its high mobility and is carried out not only in one region, but also across national borders. This article aims to explain the meaning and scope of economic crime, define the characteristics of economic crime and determine the regulation of economic crime in the Indonesian legal system. Based on the research, it was found that economic criminal law is part of the criminal law that has its own characteristics, namely the economic character with a very broad scope, including: smuggling, banking crimes, commercial crimes, cyber crimes, environmental crimes, digital economic crimes, crimes in the field of intellectual property rights, corruption, crimes in the field of labor and others. The research method used uses a normative legal approach. The purpose of this study is to determine the efforts of the Indonesian government in implementing regulations related to cases of economic violations in order to realize the eradication of economic crime in Indonesia. The research results state that as a special criminal law, the law governing economic violations certainly has a strong theoretical basis. Economic criminal law has special provisions contained in the field of substantive criminal law and criminal procedure law. Economic crimes are regulated in Emergency Law Number 7 of 1955 concerning the investigation, prosecution and trial of economic crimes.
PERAN LEMBAGA LEGISLATIF DALAM KONFIGURASI POLITIK HUKUM: ANTARA ASPIRASI PUBLIK DAN KEPENTINGAN POLITIK UNTUK MENCAPAI KARAKTERISTIK PRODUK HUKUM Kusuma, Aditama Candra; Tesalonika, Ligina; Ayyasy, Rofi; Halim, Wahidul; Fauzan, Anis; Prasetyo, Handoyo; Winanti, Atik
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 4 No 1 (2024): Volume 4, Nomor 1, Desember 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jhs.v4i1.9930

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas peran lembaga legislatif dalam menghadapi dilema antara memperjuangkan aspirasi publik dan kepentingan politik partai dalam proses legislasi di Indonesia. Sebagai salah satu pilar utama dalam sistem pemerintahan, lembaga legislatif memiliki fungsi penting dalam pembentukan undang-undang, pengawasan, dan pengesahan anggaran negara. Namun, anggota legislatif sering kali dihadapkan pada ketegangan antara kepentingan publik dan tuntutan politik dari partai yang mendukung mereka, yang dapat mempengaruhi kualitas produk hukum yang dihasilkan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor hukum, politik, dan sosial yang memengaruhi proses legislasi. Selain itu, penelitian ini menyoroti bagaimana sistem pemilihan umum dan dominasi partai politik menciptakan tekanan pada anggota legislatif, serta pengaruh lobi dari kelompok kepentingan ekonomi dalam proses pembuatan kebijakan. Untuk mengatasi dilema ini, peningkatan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan partisipasi publik dalam proses legislasi dipandang sebagai solusi penting untuk menciptakan produk hukum yang adil dan inklusif
Legal Protection For Advocates Who Are Considered Not In Good Faith For Alleged Obstruction Of Justice In Corruption Cases Erwan Budi Herianto; Handoyo Prasetyo; Slamet Tri Wahyudi
International Journal of Society and Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Yayasan Multidimensi Kreatif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61306/ijsl.v2i3.336

Abstract

Advocates as one of the professions in the field of law in their duty to defend clients both inside and outside the trial are equipped with privileges in the form of legal protection (immunity), but often these privileges are abused by advocates by obstruction of justice especially in cases of corruption crimes that aim to prevent clients from being investigated by Police Investigators, the Prosecutor's Office or the KPK. There are differences in the parameters of the assessment of good or bad ethics by an Advocate carried out by the Investigator so that it is considered to be an obstruction of justice so that there is a conflict between the legal norms contained in Article 16 of Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates and the reality that occurs in the field. The problem that causes advocates to be considered not to be good at obstructing justice in corruption cases is due to the absence of assessment parameters of advocates who are not in good faith and the absence of legal protection for advocates who are suspected of obstruction of justice, especially in corruption cases. The method used in this study is normative - empirical legal research, using a case approach, a legislative approach (statue approach) and a conceptual approach (Conceptual Approach). This study aims to examine the assessment parameters of advocates who do not have good faith against the suspicion of obstruction of justice by investigators and to find out the analysis of legal protection (immunity rights) owned by advocates who are considered to have no good faith by committing obstruction of justice, especially in cases of corruption. The results of this study are that the criteria for Advocates who are considered not in good faith are violations of the code of ethics, laws and regulations, oath or promise of Advocates as well as the value of feasibility and propriety. In addition, in order to create legal protection and certainty, a special institution such as the Advocate Honorary Council is needed which aims to determine whether the actions of the Advocate who are considered not to be in good faith are contrary to the etic code or laws and regulations or not.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Dokter Umum Terkait Pelimpahan Wewenang Tindakan Medik dari Dokter Spesialis Menurut Omnibus Law Kesehatan 2023 Jaury Douglas Pardomuan; Handoyo Prasetyo
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): September : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v1i3.411

Abstract

In carrying out their duties, general practitioners have limitations both in terms of knowledge and medical facilities they possess. Furthermore, based on the Omnibus Health Law 2023, there are regulations that govern general practitioners regarding the medical procedures they can and cannot perform. Several articles that regulate referral issues are Article 19, Article 32, Article 189, and Article 360. Meanwhile, the regulation regarding specialist doctors is listed in Articles 233-235. However, it is important to emphasize that the authority of specialist doctors and general practitioners is not directly regulated in the Omnibus Law. Thus, the study that can be conducted is an interpretative study that compares it simultaneously with similar legal products. Other references that can be used are Presidential Regulation no. 31 of 2019 and Minister of Health Regulation no. 36 of 2019. Based on a comparative study and judicial analysis of the Omnibus Health Law 2023, specialist doctors have their own independence, and therefore, if they delegate authority to general practitioners, it is guaranteed by the law, including the Omnibus Health Law 2023, especially because the Omnibus Health Law 2023 opens up flexibility for specialist doctors to practice. If delegation occurs, general practitioners can be legally protected as long as the basis for this delegation is emergency for patient safety, secondly is the delegation of authority to ensure patient safety, and thirdly is part of the education for specialist doctors. Although not explicitly stated, these implications are strongly implied in the articles mentioned in the Omnibus Health Law. Nevertheless, there are certain limits that specialist doctors must follow to ensure that patients' rights are well protected, and in the future, there needs to be a strengthening of regulations so that both general practitioners and specialist doctors do not face criminalization.
Reconstruction of Criminal Design Based on Strict Liability Theory for Hospitals in Cases of Medical Malpractice Against Patients Prasetyo, Handoyo; Waluyo, Bambang; Subakdi, Subakdi; Roring, Edward Benedictus; Salles, Sergio
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v6n2.p331-355

Abstract

The increasing number of medical malpractice cases is ironic, because with the current Health Law it is hoped that malpractice cases can be reduced in number. The Health Law and other regulations must be obeyed by all parties in the world of health, especially hospital corporations so that apart from medical personnel or health workers, hospitals, directors and hospital management must also take legal responsibility, in accordance with their respective roles in the event of malpractice in the hospital environment. On the other hand, the stakeholders of this hospital will receive legal protection if they have implemented all their rights and obligations in accordance with applicable legal provisions. The specific purpose of this research is to prove that hospital corporations are also eligible for criminal sanctions if malpractice occurs in the hospital environment, through the application of strict liability principle, compiled with the interconnection of various related legislation products. This research uses normative juridical research methods that are descriptive prescriptive, using data and information from relevant literature sources, primary legal sources in the form of statutory provisions and jurisprudence, corporate theories used to analyse the problems, as well as research data obtained from the internet/website of related agencies. Keywords: hospitals, liability, malpractice
Reformasi Regulasi Melalui UU Cipta Kerja Sebagai Landasan Sinergitas Nasional Dalam Upaya Mengantisipasi Resesi Global Prasetyo, Handoyo
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 20, No 1 (2023): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Maret 2023
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v20i1.1034

Abstract

Resesi ekonomi global diproyeksikan oleh banyak ekonom akan terjadi pada tahun 2023 dan berdampak pada pelemahan ekonomi Indoensia. Pemerintah Indonesia juga dihadapkan pada kondisi kualitas dan kuantitas regulasi saat ini yang berpotensi saling tumpang tindih, disharmoni, dan menimbulkan konflik, karena sangat ego sektoral dan ego kedaerahan. Tantangan lain adalah adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor  91/PUU-XVIII/2020, menyatakan bahwa UU Cipta Kerja inkonstitusional bersyarat dan harus diperbaiki dalam jangka waktu dua tahun sejak diputuskan pada tanggal 25 November 2021. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini terkait bagaimana mengantisipasi proyeksi resesi ekonomi global 2023 yang semakin dekat simultan dengan reformasi sektor regulasi termasuk UU Cipta Kerja pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Penelitian ini mempergunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif yang bersifat preskriptif analisis, lebih menekankan pada penelitian kepustakaan dengan metode pendekatan konseptual guna memberikan solusi dari permasalahan yang muncul. Hasil analisis dalam penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa keberadaan UU Cipta Kerja  menjadi salah satu unsur pendukung dari berbagai eleman yang dibutuhkan melalui sinegitas seluruh pemangku kepentingannya, bergerak maju secara harmonis untuk mengantisipasi dampak resesi ekonomi global bagi perekonomian Indonesia, dengan menerapkan konsep Blue Ocean Strategy yang diadopsikan dalam tindakan seluruh pemangku kepentingan di Indonesia. Kata kunci : Resesi, Cipta Kerja, Pemangku Kepentingan, Blue Ocean Strategy
Legal Counsel Assistance in Court Proceedings in Criminal Cases Singh, Rakhbir; Supardi; Prasetyo, Handoyo
LAW & PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): April
Publisher : PT. Multidisciplinary Press Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/lawpass.v2i1.66

Abstract

The Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) does not differentiate between ethnic groups or nationalities, ensuring that all individuals are treated equally before the court, whether in the District Court, High Court, or Supreme Court. Suspects or defendants are no longer viewed as "objects" but as "subjects" who possess rights and obligations, including the right to claim compensation or rehabilitation in cases of wrongful arrest, detention, prosecution, or legal judgment. The reality that many suspects/defendants are not accompanied by legal counsel during criminal proceedings raises significant questions about why the provisions of KUHAP are not adhered to. This thesis aims to analyze and elaborate on the regulations within KUHAP concerning the obligation of legal counsel to assist suspects/defendants in court proceedings and to analyze and elaborate on the rules that should govern the implementation of the obligation for legal counsel in criminal cases. The type of legal research employed in this work is normative legal research. This research is prescriptive in nature, aiming to provide a careful, comprehensive, and systematic description and analysis of the characteristics of individual or group behavior. Legal assistance by counsel is a fundamental right that must be fulfilled in every legal process, as stipulated in Article 56 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). Ironically, the hegemony of scientific studies tends to focus more on the subordination and compliance of citizens to the law rather than the subordination and compliance of law enforcement officials to the law itself. This obligation not only aims to protect the rights of suspects but also to ensure that the principles of justice and the protection of human rights are upheld within the criminal justice system in Indonesia.
Legal Protection for Doctors Against Refusal of Medical Ser-vices by Elderly Patients in Indonesia Jaury Douglas Pardomuan; Abdul Kolib; Handoyo Prasetyo
International Journal of Public Health Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Public Health
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Kesehatan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijph.v2i2.430

Abstract

The growing elderly population in Indonesia has created structural challenges in the health care system. One of the crucial challenges arises in the aspect of medical decision-making that becomes increasingly complex, along with the decline in cognitive capacity, comorbidities, and chronic diseases that accompany this age group. Problems arise when elderly patients refuse medical treatment, while doctors have ethical and professional obligations to save lives. This condition is complicated by social pressure from families and collective cultural values that often ignore the right to individual autonomy. As a result, doctors are in a vulnerable position legally and ethically, especially when there are no regulations that explicitly and technically regulate the limits of professional responsibility. This study aims to analyze the form of legal protection for doctors in the face of refusal of medical action by elderly patients. The method used is normative juridical, with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results show that there are no specific rules regarding the mechanism of informed refusal, evaluation of the decision-making capacity of elderly patients, and the limits of legal responsibility of doctors. This creates legal uncertainty, even when doctors have acted according to professional standards and medical ethics. This study recommends the establishment of technical regulations that strictly regulate the procedures for refusal of medical action by elderly patients. Legal protection for doctors is not only a professional guarantee, but also an integral part of a health system that is fair, sustainable, and ensures legal certainty in modern medical practice.
Co-Authors Abdallah, Raffi Ikzaaz Abdul Haris Nafis Abdul Kholib Abdul Kolib Achmad Firdaus Afdhali, Dino Rizka Afifah, Dashilfa Aissyah Lintang Pramudya Aisyah Nurhalizah Aisyah, Rizka Rahadiyani Aji Lukman Ibrahim Akhmad Kautsar Fattah Albert Sintong Limbong Alejendra Anjani, Axara Alifiandra, Muhammad Reiza Alifio Kadafi Alreindra Pradityo Wahyu Alvaro Achmad Rabbani, Radiyya Amanda Cherly Nasution Amelia Amelia Andriyan Rahardi Angel Evelin Anissa Nabilla Anjani Nurdin, Aulia Anni Alvionita Simanjuntak Ardiana, Oktavia Dwi Arfah Naila Rahmah Ariel Lois Aristias, Adinda Arsensius, Ricarda Atik Winanti Aurelita, Mira Avridha Riyanti Maharani Ayyasy, Rofi Azizah Arfah Azzahra, Dinda Azzahra, Nabila Adifia Bambang Waluyo Bambang Waluyo Bambang Waluyo Bambang Waluyo Bayu Aji Adhyarsa Beniharmoni Harefa Bintang A, Immanuel Given Clarita Ayu Putri Setya Daniel Tambunan Darto Darto Darto Supadmo Dedin F. Rosida Dewanti, Tyur Regina Difqa Alvi Ramadhandiko Dwi Winda Lestari Edward Benedictus Roring Edward Benedictus Roring Ega Laksmana Triwiraputra Enina Wika Vetricha Wulandari Erni Agustin Erwan Budi Herianto Fabhian Halky Syahir Fadhillah, Muhammad Arif Fahrozi, Muhammad Helmi Falevi, Yunizar FANDY GULTOM Fathan Muhammad Ghifary Fatma Putri Fadilah Fauzan, Anis Fawwaz, Razky Febrian Halomoan Febrian Halomoan Febrian Halomoan Febriyanto, Bagas Ferdiansyah, Diva Salsabila Fetty Tri Anggraeny Fikrie, Safina Nabila Gabriella, Theresia Ghina Rhoudotul Jannah Halim, Wahidul Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Hanifah, Nida Syahla Harsanti, Khairunnisa Putri Haryanto, Imam Hendra Parulian Heru Sugiyono Irwan Triadi Iswanti Rachmanisa Izzati, Aulia Putri Jaury Douglas Pardomuan Jonathan Andreas Sitorus Kholib, Abdul Khoyron Nasir, Tomi Kusuma, Aditama Candra Lisza Nurchayatie Loren, Medina Lulu Mufidah Mahameru, Danil Erlangga Mahardika, Agus Manullang, Imelda Arthameisia Manurung, Karina Hasiyanni Maulida Fitriani Michael Giovanni Joseph Milda, Nofi Mohammad Haikal Rasyid Muhammad Athaya Primananda Muhammad Bintang Firdaus Muhammad Damar Setyo Kumoro Muhammad fauzan Mutaqin, Fadzal Nabila Putri Adelita Nada Prima Dirkareshza Nadjima, Aulia Rachmatullah Narindra, Rochella Amalia Natalia, Imelda Hera Nefrisa Adlina Maaruf Noerman, Chiquita Thefirstly Novyana, Hilda Nurfajriana, Syifa Nyndhya, Rozzyana Pakpahan, David Roger Julius Pasah, Marip Pranitiaz, Laras Medina Putra, Alfarel Endito Putri Azzuri Putri Mufidah Putri Sejati, Presyta Nurhalida Putri, Nasywa Awalia Qinthara, Alika Faza Raihan Wibowo Raka Haikal Anfasya Rania Syifa Busroni Rara Siti Sandiah Rildo Anuar Sihite Rinanti, Pitra Risa Rasmitha, Nadia Riyawan, Dara Puspita Rizal Ananda Gibran Rohmah Dwi Cahyanigsih Roring, Edward Benedictus Ryan Apriyandi Sabrina, Fadiah Tarisa Sachmaso, Hana Humaira Salles, Sergio Saputra, Dhimas Setya, Clarita Ayu Putri Setyarini, Astri Dewi Sigiro, Talenta Ribka Singh, Rakhbir Situmeang, Zefanya Angelica Slamet Tri Wahyudi Slamet Tri Wahyudi Subakdi Subakdi - Subakdi Subakdi Subakdi, Subakdi Sukma, Nina Fitria Supardi Supardi Supardi Surahmad Surahmad, Surahmad Suzeeta, Nala Syandhira Syabilal Ali Syah, Aurellia Zerikha Syahda Mauldiyani Syifa, Nada Tamir A, Sulthan Muhammad Tasya Darosyifa Taufik Efendi Tesalonika, Ligina Vedita Akbar Vinka Arzetta Fiana Wahyu S.J. Saputra Wibowo, Hanifah Fairuz Yanathifal Salsabila Anggraeni