p-Index From 2021 - 2026
11.203
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Patrika Spektrum Hukum Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Rechtsidee Gorontalo Law Review Jurnal Yuridis Veteran Law Review Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni SABDAMAS JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Esensi Hukum Jurnal Suara Hukum Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences International Journal of Social Service and Research Jurnal Nasional Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Law Development Journal Jurnal Impresi Indonesia International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Journal Evidence Of Law Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Jurnal Ekonomi, Teknologi dan Bisnis Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal RechtIdee Jurnal Global Ilmiah Majority Science Journal Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Intellektika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ardhi: Jurnal Pengabdian dalam Negri Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia Sosial Simbiosis: Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) ARIMA : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora LAWPASS Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora International Journal Of Public Health International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice International Journal of Sociology and Law Kolaborasi: Jurnal Hasil Kegiatan Kolaborasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum Statuta International Journal of Society and Law Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Journal of Contemporary Business Law & Technology: Cyber Law, Blockchain, and Legal Innovations KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN ISLAMIC STATE OF IRAQ AND SYRIA (ISIS) ATAS TINDAKAN TERORISME DI MOSKOW DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Situmeang, Zefanya Angelica; Prasetyo, Handoyo
Journal of Contemporary Business Law & Technology: Cyber Law, Blockchain, and Legal Innovations Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): European Journal of Contemporary Business Law & Technology: Cyber Law, Blockcha
Publisher : Antis Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ejcblt.v1i6.688

Abstract

society
Model of Corporate Criminal Liability in Preventing Corporate Recidivism in Money Laundering Offenses Fadilah, Fatma Putri; Prasetyo, Handoyo
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.12942

Abstract

This study analyzes corporate criminal liability in money laundering cases involving PT Duta Palma Group through the lens of deterrence theory and examines strategies to optimize corporate liability to prevent repeat corporate offending. The research is motivated by the inadequate application of corporate criminal sanctions in the conviction of Surya Darmadi, the owner of PT Duta Palma Group, which failed to prevent subsequent money laundering offenses committed by Cheryl Darmadi involving cross-border fund transfers to Hong Kong and her escape to Singapore. A normative juridical method was employed, utilizing statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case approaches. The novelty of this study lies in its integration of Jeremy Bentham’s deterrence theory with a comparative analysis of the French legal framework to develop a more effective model for corporate criminal liability. The findings indicate that the court's decision against Surya Darmadi lacked a sufficient deterrent effect because the sanctions imposed were not proportional to the financial and social harms caused. This study proposes a reformulated model for enhancing corporate criminal liability based on proportional sanctions, strengthened deterrence mechanisms, and the adoption of relevant features from the French legal system. Such a framework is expected to reduce the likelihood of corporate recidivism and promote more effective enforcement in money laundering cases.
Reformulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Fraud Pada Lembaga Investasi Negara Aisyah Nurhalizah; Handoyo Prasetyo
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.12957

Abstract

This study analyzes the differences in the legal frameworks for fraud prevention in state investment institutions in Indonesia and Singapore to formulate an ideal model for strengthening Danantara's accountability as a state investment institution. The normative gap arises because Indonesia does not yet have an integrated legal system capable of addressing non-budgetary corporate fraud, while Singapore implements a more comprehensive approach through the PCA, Penal Code, and SFA, which are operated in an integrated manner by the CPIB, MAS, and CAD. This study uses a normative juridical method with legislative, comparative, and conceptual approaches to assess the effectiveness of regulations and formulate a reconstruction of the authority of law enforcement agencies. The results show that the limited definition of corruption in the Corruption Eradication Law and the scope of the Corruption Eradication Commission's authority, which is limited by Article 11, create a jurisdictional gap in handling fraud at Danantara. In contrast, Singapore has succeeded in establishing an integrated and preventive legal system based on the principle of corporate accountability. The novelty of this study lies in the idea of ​​reformulating the KPK's authority to cover strategic corporate fraud and harmonizing criminal law and state investment governance within a single supervisory framework. These findings have important implications for the formulation of national policies to strengthen the integrity of state investment institutions through adaptive and prevention-oriented law enforcement.   Penelitian ini menganalisis perbedaan kerangka hukum pencegahan fraud pada lembaga investasi negara di Indonesia dan Singapura untuk merumuskan model ideal penguatan akuntabilitas Danantara sebagai lembaga investasi negara. Kesenjangan normatif muncul karena Indonesia belum memiliki sistem hukum terintegrasi yang mampu menjangkau fraud korporasi non-anggaran, sementara Singapura menerapkan pendekatan yang lebih komprehensif melalui PCA, Penal Code, dan SFA yang dioperasikan secara terpadu oleh CPIB, MAS, dan CAD. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, perbandingan, dan konseptual untuk menilai efektivitas pengaturan dan merumuskan rekonstruksi kewenangan lembaga penegak hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keterbatasan definisi korupsi dalam UU Tipikor serta ruang lingkup kewenangan KPK yang dibatasi Pasal 11 menimbulkan jurisdictional gap dalam penanganan fraud di Danantara. Sebaliknya, Singapura berhasil membangun sistem hukum yang terintegrasi dan preventif berdasarkan prinsip akuntabilitas korporasi. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada gagasan reformulasi kewenangan KPK untuk mencakup fraud korporasi strategis serta harmonisasi hukum pidana dan tata kelola investasi negara dalam satu kerangka pengawasan. Temuan ini memberikan implikasi penting bagi perumusan kebijakan nasional guna memperkuat integritas lembaga investasi negara melalui penegakan hukum yang adaptif dan berorientasi pada pencegahan.
Reorientasi Peran Warga dalam Pencegahan Kejahatan Penipuan yang Meresahkan Masyarakat Handoyo Prasetyo; Bambang Waluyo; Subakdi Subakdi; Anni Alvionita Simanjuntak; Edward Benedictus Roring; Alifio Kadafi; Muhammad Damar Setyo Kumoro
KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/kreatif.v5i2.5800

Abstract

The increasing number of fraud cases that harm the community is a serious concern. Fraudsters commit crimes with various modes of operation, such as Bodong Investment, giveaways, auctions, online fraud, and job vacancy fraud. The community not only experiences material losses in the form of losing a large amount of money, or losing invested capital, but also experiences psychological losses, and reputation. This community service activity initiates proactive efforts to overcome this problem by reorienting the role of citizens as the front line in preventing crime. By involving the academic community of the Faculty of Law, UPN Veteran Jakarta, this activity seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of various fraud modes of operation, as well as effective prevention strategies. In addition, this activity also aims to strengthen the sense of ownership and responsibility of citizens towards their environment, as a real manifestation of the spirit of defending the country.
Criminal Law Enforcement Corruption Against State-Owned Enterprises After The Enactment of The SOE Law In 2025 Loren, Medina; Prasetyo, Handoyo
Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1101

Abstract

General Background: State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) play a strategic role in Indonesia’s welfare-state framework but remain highly vulnerable to corruption, particularly due to long-standing ambiguities in the legal status of SOE assets. Specific Background: The enactment of Law No. 1 of 2025 and Law No. 16 of 2025 fundamentally redefines SOEs as pure corporate entities by separating SOE assets from state finances and adopting the Business Judgment Rule (BJR). Knowledge Gap: Despite these reforms, there is limited scholarly clarity on how corruption law enforcement should be applied to SOEs after 2025, especially in distinguishing business risk from criminal abuse of authority. Aims: This study analyzes the direction and implications of corruption law enforcement against SOEs following the 2025 SOE Law. Results: Using a normative legal method and case-based analysis of the LPEI, PT BRI, and PT Perindo cases, the study finds that SOE accountability may shift to the public domain when losses arise from conflicts of interest or abuse of authority, thereby nullifying BJR protection. Novelty: This research is among the first to systematically examine corruption enforcement under the post-2025 SOE legal regime using recent cases. Implications: The findings emphasize the need for clear enforcement guidelines to prevent the misuse of BJR while ensuring legal certainty and effective anti-corruption measures in SOEs. Highlights: Asset Separation: SOE assets are legally distinguished from state finances, altering the basis for determining public financial loss. BJR Limitation: The Business Judgment Rule protects good-faith decisions but does not apply where conflicts of interest or abuse of authority exist. Enforcement Direction: Corruption law remains applicable to SOEs when corporate governance failures shift accountability to the public domain. Keywords: State-Owned Enterprises, Corruption Law Enforcement, Business Judgment Rule, Corporate Accountability, Legal Reform
Penguatan Peran Akuntan Publik Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Praktik Window Dressing Start Up Risa Rasmitha, Nadia; Prasetyo, Handoyo
Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Vol. 4 No. 12 (2025): JURNAL LOCUS: Penelitian dan Pengabdian
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/locus.v4i12.5272

Abstract

Skandal dugaan manipulasi laporan keuangan (window dressing) pada perusahaan rintisan (startup) eFishery menyoroti kelemahan pengawasan audit eksternal dalam ekosistem ekonomi digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis urgensi optimalisasi pertanggungjawaban pidana Akuntan Publik guna mencegah praktik window dressing yang merugikan kepercayaan investor. Penelitian ini menerapkan metode hukum normatif dengan memadukan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, studi kasus, serta analisis perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme sanksi administratif, sebagaimana diterapkan pada kasus Garuda Indonesia, belum memadai untuk memberikan efek jera terhadap kejahatan korporasi bernilai tinggi. Berdasarkan studi komparasi terhadap kasus Enron (Amerika Serikat) dan Satyam (India), penegakan hukum global cenderung menerapkan sanksi tegas berupa pidana badan dan pelarangan praktik permanen bagi auditor yang terbukti berkolusi. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa dalam kasus eFishery, diperlukan investigasi mendalam untuk membedakan antara kelalaian profesional (culpa) dengan kesengajaan (dolus). Apabila ditemukan unsur kesengajaan atau pembiaran, maka penerapan sanksi pidana penjara dan denda secara optimal berdasarkan Pasal 55 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2011 tentang Akuntan Publik mutlak diperlukan sebagai upaya preventif untuk menjamin integritas pasar modal.
Model Pemidanaan Korporasi Berbasis Efek Jera dalam Kasus Korupsi di Indonesia Pitra Rinanti; Handoyo Prasetyo
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.13005

Abstract

This study analyzes the application of the deterrence effect concept in corporate sentencing for corruption offenses by examining Supreme Court Decision Number 2583 K/Pid.Sus/2024. The research is motivated by the weak deterrent impact of corporate corruption sentencing in Indonesia, as reflected in sanctions that are disproportionate to the magnitude of state losses. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches, supported by conceptual and comparative analyses of asset confiscation practices in Singapore and Hong Kong. The findings reveal that the cassation decision fails to adequately reflect the deterrence effect, as the imposed fines and compensation are not proportional to the state's loss of IDR 480 billion. This condition indicates the absence of substantive justice in corporate corruption sentencing. The novelty of this research lies in integrating the directing mind theory, deterrence theory, and theories of justice proposed by John Rawls and Aristotle to assess the effectiveness of corporate criminal liability. The study recommends a multi-track punishment system for corporate corruption cases, combining proportional fines, asset confiscation, and legal reform of Article 18 paragraph (1)(b) of the Anti-Corruption Law to enhance deterrence and substantive justice in Indonesia.   Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis penerapan konsep deterrence effect dalam pemidanaan korporasi pada tindak pidana korupsi dengan merujuk pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2583 K/Pid.Sus/2024. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasarkan pada lemahnya efek jera dalam pemidanaan korupsi korporasi di Indonesia, yang tercermin dari tidak proporsionalnya sanksi pidana dengan besarnya kerugian negara. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, serta didukung pendekatan konseptual dan komparatif melalui perbandingan praktik perampasan aset di Singapura dan Hong Kong. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan kasasi tersebut belum mencerminkan deterrence effect secara optimal, karena pidana denda dan uang pengganti yang dijatuhkan tidak sebanding dengan kerugian negara sebesar Rp480 miliar. Kondisi ini menunjukkan belum terpenuhinya keadilan substantif dalam pemidanaan korporasi pelaku korupsi. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada integrasi teori directing mind, deterrence effect, serta teori keadilan John Rawls dan Aristoteles dalam mengevaluasi efektivitas pemidanaan korporasi. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan model pemidanaan korporasi berbasis multi-track punishment system melalui kombinasi denda proporsional, perampasan aset, dan pembaruan Pasal 18 ayat (1) huruf b Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi guna memperkuat efek jera dan keadilan substantif.
Perspektif keadilan dalam kontrak komersial berdasarkan asas proporsionalitas: analisis normatif terhadap praktik hukum kontrak di Indonesia Lisza Nurchayatie; Taufik Efendi; Handoyo Prasetyo
JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)
Publisher : Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Theraphy (IICET)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/020256341

Abstract

Commercial contract practices in Indonesia still reveal an imbalance of bargaining power, particularly through the use of standard-form contracts that often disadvantage one party. This condition raises questions regarding the role of the principle of proportionality in achieving contractual justice. This study aims to analyze the application of the proportionality principle as a corrective instrument to the freedom of contract in order to realize a fair balance of rights and obligations between parties. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches, based on primary legal materials such as the Indonesian Civil Code and court decisions, as well as relevant national and international literature on contractual fairness. The findings indicate that the proportionality principle plays a vital role in maintaining substantial balance between contracting parties and aligns with Aristotle’s theories of distributive and corrective justice. However, its implementation remains weak due to the lack of control over standard contract clauses. The study recommends adopting the proportionality principle as a benchmark for contract formulation and judicial review to ensure fair, ethical, and sustainable business practices.
Administrative Penal Law Enforcement in Beauty Clinics: Unauthorized Use of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices in Indonesia Intan Riani, Marsya; Prasetyo, Handoyo; Harefa, Beniharmoni
LAW & PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies Vol. 2 No. 6 (2026): February
Publisher : PT. Multidisciplinary Press Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/lawpass.v2i6.102

Abstract

The rapid growth of beauty clinics in Indonesia has raised significant legal concerns regarding the unauthorized use of pharmaceutical preparations and medical devices, including dermarollers. Although Indonesian health law provides administrative and criminal sanctions, enforcement mechanisms remain fragmented and inconsistently applied. This study examines the enforcement of administrative penal law in addressing unlawful practices in beauty clinics, particularly the misuse of pharmaceuticals and medical devices without proper authorization. This research employs a normative juridical method supported by statutory and case approaches. It analyzes relevant legislation, including health law and medical device regulations, as well as selected court decisions to evaluate how administrative and criminal sanctions are implemented in practice. The findings reveal that enforcement tends to prioritize criminal prosecution while administrative measures—such as license revocation, suspension, and regulatory supervision—are underutilized. This imbalance weakens preventive regulatory control and creates enforcement gaps. The study argues that effective health law enforcement requires an integrated administrative-penal framework that positions administrative sanctions as the primary preventive instrument, with criminal sanctions functioning as ultimum remedium. This research contributes to the development of administrative penal law theory within the context of health regulation and offers policy recommendations to strengthen regulatory coherence in Indonesia’s beauty clinic sector.
Enforcement of Law Against Violations of Dedicated Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Lanes in the Legal Systems of Indonesia and the United States Tambunan, Daniel; Prasetyo, Handoyo
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.1.1-12

Abstract

This article examines the legal framework and law enforcement mechanisms addressing violations of exclusive Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) lanes, with a primary focus on the TransJakarta system in Indonesia and a comparative perspective with practices in Minneapolis and Austin, United States. The misuse of dedicated BRT lanes by unauthorized vehicles remains a persistent urban transport problem that undermines service efficiency, travel time reliability, and public trust in mass transportation systems. Despite the existence of clear legal norms, weak compliance and inconsistent enforcement continue to challenge the effectiveness of BRT operations. This research applies a normative juridical method using statutory and comparative approaches. Primary legal materials include national traffic and transportation laws, regional regulations of the Jakarta Provincial Government, and municipal ordinances in selected U.S. cities. Secondary legal materials consist of academic journals, policy reports, and official government publications related to public transportation and traffic law enforcement. The findings indicate that Indonesia relies heavily on a centralized regulatory framework supported by police enforcement and electronic traffic law enforcement (ETLE), while enforcement consistency and technological coverage remain limited. In contrast, cities in the United States emphasize localized regulation, automated enforcement systems, and administrative sanctions designed to create a deterrent effect. This study concludes that strengthening inter-agency coordination, expanding evidence-based automated enforcement, harmonizing sanctions between national and local regulations, and enhancing public legal awareness are essential to improving compliance and ensuring the sustainability of BRT systems as a backbone of urban mobility.
Co-Authors Abdallah, Raffi Ikzaaz Abdul Haris Nafis Abdul Kolib Achmad Firdaus Afdhali, Dino Rizka Afifah, Dashilfa Aissyah Lintang Pramudya Aisyah Nurhalizah Aisyah, Rizka Rahadiyani Aji Lukman Ibrahim Akhmad Kautsar Fattah Alejendra Anjani, Axara Alifiandra, Muhammad Reiza Alifio Kadafi Alreindra Pradityo Wahyu Alvaro Achmad Rabbani, Radiyya Amanda Cherly Nasution Amelia Amelia Angel Evelin Anissa Nabilla Anjani Nurdin, Aulia Anni Alvionita Simanjuntak Apriyandi, Ryan Ardiana, Oktavia Dwi Arfah Naila Rahmah Aristias, Adinda Arsensius, Ricarda Atik Winanti Aurelita, Mira Avridha Riyanti Maharani Ayyasy, Rofi Azizah Arfah Azzahra, Dinda Azzahra, Nabila Adifia Bambang Waluyo Bambang Waluyo Bambang Waluyo Bayu Aji Adhyarsa Beniharmoni Harefa Bintang A, Immanuel Given Darosyifa, Tasya Darto Darto Dedin F. Rosida Dewanti, Tyur Regina Difqa Alvi Ramadhandiko Dwi Winda Lestari Edward Benedictus Roring Edward Benedictus Roring Enina Wika Vetricha Wulandari Erni Agustin Erwan Budi Herianto Fabhian Halky Syahir Fadhillah, Muhammad Arif Fadilah, Fatma Putri Fahrozi, Muhammad Helmi Falevi, Yunizar FANDY GULTOM Fauzan, Anis Fawwaz, Razky Febriyanto, Bagas Ferdiansyah, Diva Salsabila Fetty Tri Anggraeny Fikrie, Safina Nabila Gabriella, Theresia Ghifary, Fathan Muhammad Ghina Rhoudotul Jannah Halim, Wahidul Halomoan, Febrian Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Hanifah, Nida Syahla Harsanti, Khairunnisa Putri Haryanto, Imam Hendra Parulian Heru Sugiyono Intan Riani, Marsya Irwan Triadi Iswanti Rachmanisa Izzati, Aulia Putri Jaury Douglas Pardomuan Jonathan Andreas Sitorus Kholib, Abdul Khoyron Nasir, Tomi Kusuma, Aditama Candra Laksmana Triwiraputra, Ega Limbong, Albert Sintong Lisza Nurchayatie Lois, Ariel Loren, Medina Lulu Mufidah Mahameru, Danil Erlangga Mahardika, Agus Manullang, Imelda Arthameisia Manurung, Karina Hasiyanni Maulida Fitriani Michael Giovanni Joseph Milda, Nofi Mohammad Haikal Rasyid Muhammad Athaya Primananda Muhammad Bintang Firdaus Muhammad Damar Setyo Kumoro Muhammad fauzan Mutaqin, Fadzal Nabila Putri Adelita Nada Prima Dirkareshza Nadjima, Aulia Rachmatullah Narindra, Rochella Amalia Natalia, Imelda Hera Nefrisa Adlina Maaruf Noerman, Chiquita Thefirstly Novyana, Hilda Nurfajriana, Syifa Nyndhya, Rozzyana Pakpahan, David Roger Julius Pasah, Marip Pitra Rinanti Pranitiaz, Laras Medina Putra, Alfarel Endito Putri Azzuri Putri Mufidah Putri Sartika, Mutia Ananda Putri Sejati, Presyta Nurhalida Putri, Amelia Putri, Nasywa Awalia Qinthara, Alika Faza Rahardi, Andriyan Raihan Wibowo Raka Haikal Anfasya Rania Syifa Busroni Rara Siti Sandiah Rildo Anuar Sihite Rinanti, Pitra Risa Rasmitha, Nadia Riyawan, Dara Puspita Rizal Ananda Gibran Rohmah Dwi Cahyanigsih Roring, Edward Benedictus Sabrina, Fadiah Tarisa Sachmaso, Hana Humaira Salles, Sergio Saputra, Dhimas Setya, Clarita Ayu Putri Setyarini, Astri Dewi Sigiro, Talenta Ribka Singh, Rakhbir Siti Zubaidah Situmeang, Zefanya Angelica Slamet Tri Wahyudi Subakdi Subakdi Subakdi Subakdi, Subakdi Sukma, Nina Fitria Supadmo, Darto Supardi Supardi Supardi Surahmad Surahmad, Surahmad Suzeeta, Nala Syandhira Syabilal Ali Syah, Aurellia Zerikha Syahda Mauldiyani Syifa, Nada Tambunan, Daniel Tamir A, Sulthan Muhammad Taufik Efendi Tesalonika, Ligina Vedita Akbar Vinka Arzetta Fiana Wahyu S.J. Saputra Wibowo, Hanifah Fairuz Wijaya, Deni Yanathifal Salsabila Anggraeni