Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
21.083
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Masalah-Masalah Hukum LAW REFORM Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Pandecta Lentera Hukum Al-'Adalah JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum Novelty Tadulako Law Review Diponegoro Law Review Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) MAHKAMAH: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Jurisprudence Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Akta International Journal of Law Reconstruction Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY MLJ Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Varia Justicia JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM Widya Yuridika Halu Oleo Law Review Nagari Law Review Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Martabe : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Etika Demokrasi JOURNAL OF PRIVATE AND COMMERCIAL LAW WAJAH HUKUM Gorontalo Law Review Jurnal Abdimasa Jurnal Jatiswara Jurnal Hukum Prasada ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Restorative Justice Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora JUSTISI SIGn Jurnal Hukum Prosiding National Conference for Community Service Project Mulawarman Law Review Sapientia Et Virtus Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Jurnal Inovasi Ekonomi KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Jurnal Yustisiabel Legal Spirit Jurnal Supremasi Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Journal of Judicial Review AMNESTI : Jurnal Hukum POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Batulis Civil Law Review Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Sultan Jurisprudence : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL PERSPEKTIF ADMINISTRASI DAN BISNIS Hang Tuah Law Journal Jurnal Hukum Pelita Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Mimbar Hukum Jurnal Legisia Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Qonun Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ) Jurnal Media Hukum Conference on Management, Business, Innovation, Education and Social Sciences (CoMBInES) Conference on Community Engagement Project (Concept) Conference on Business, Social Sciences and Technology (CoNeScINTech) Madani: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Kewirausahaan Jurnal Keamanan Nasional Law and Justice Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Mediasas : Media Ilmu Syari'ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah Syura: Journal of Law Vifada Assumption Journal of Law Abdurrauf Journal of Community Service Lex Scientia Law Review Human Rights et Justicia Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Jurnal Hukum to-ra: Hukum untuk mengatur dan melindungi masyarakat
Disemadi, Hari Sutra
Universitas Internasional Batam
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 215 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 215 Documents
Search

 18   19   20   21   22 
Why Do the EU and Singapore Protect E-Commerce Consumers Better Than Indonesia? Elva Elva; Hari Sutra Disemadi; Nurlaily Nurlaily; Mimi Sintia Mohd Bajury
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): July-December
Publisher : University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jkph.v5i2.53695

Abstract

This study addresses the pressing research problem of how Indonesia’s existing legal enforcement framework fails to protect consumers from irresponsible e-commerce practices, in contrast with more advanced jurisdictions such as Singapore and the European Union. The primary objective of the research is to examine and compare the enforcement models employed in Indonesia, Singapore, and the EU, with a view to identifying strengths and gaps that may inform reforms in Indonesia’s legal system. Using normative legal research, employing both comparative legal and statutory approaches, the study relies on secondary legal materials and regulations from all three jurisdictions, and analyses them through descriptive qualitative methods underpinned by Progressive Legal Theory. The findings show the EU's leadership in data protection enforcement through strong turnover-based sanctions, independent supervisory bodies, cross-border dispute resolution, and rigorous due diligence. Singapore demonstrates moderate effectiveness through accessible consumer forums, robust PDPC enforcement, and compliance tools such as CaseTrust, though its scope remains limited. Indonesia lags behind, hindered by weak sanctions, fragmented oversight, underdeveloped dispute resolution mechanisms, and a lack of independent enforcement. These insights underscore the need for Indonesia to adopt systemic reforms, including turnover-based penalties, an independent data authority, integrated online dispute resolution, and coordinated regulatory frameworks, shifting from formalistic rules toward a progressive legal ecosystem that upholds consumer protection, accountability, and digital trust.
The Effectiveness of Polling Station Supervisor Recruitment Based on Digital Literacy Competence for the SIWASLIH Application in Batam City Sahat F. Rivai Lumban Toruan; Ampuan Situmeang; Hari Sutra Disemadi
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 8 No 1: April - September 2026
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v8i1.707

Abstract

The implementation of Regional Election oversight through the SIWASLIH application in Batam City continues to face operational constraints, barriers to digital adaptation, and limited supporting facilities for Polling Station Supervisors. This empirical legal research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Polling Station Supervisor recruitment, analyze the determinants of recruitment dysfunction, and formulate optimization strategies based on digital literacy competence. Using a socio-legal approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with seven informants and analyzed through a synthesis of legal system theory and legal effectiveness theory. The findings show that the ineffective use of SIWASLIH is caused by the absence of technical recruitment norms that explicitly assess the digital literacy competence of Polling Station Supervisors. Article 27 of Law Number 8 of 2015 provides the normative basis for the duties, authorities, and reporting obligations of Polling Station Supervisors. However, the implementation of these obligations through SIWASLIH has not been supported by adequate digital selection instruments under Bawaslu Regulation Number 19 of 2017 or Decree of the Chairperson of Bawaslu Number 301/HK.01.01/K1/09/2024. The absence of these technical indicators causes recruitment to rely on administrative assessment and general interviews. This study recommends revising technical recruitment instruments, affirming digital literacy indicators in Bawaslu regulations, developing SIWASLIH with offline functionality, providing practice-based technical training, and establishing a task force for technological assistance.
Dark Patterns and Consumer Welfare in Digital Banking Practices in Southeast Asia: A Study of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Vietnam Agustianto Agustianto; Nurlaily Nurlaily; Lu Sudirman; Nur Fatihah; Hari Sutra Disemadi
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v13i1.14531

Abstract

Consumer welfare in digital banking environment has become increasingly important, as dark patterns have been observed to have continued to emerge in many digital spaces. This subtle yet dangerous modern iteration of old unethical trade practices presents a serious threat to growing economies like Indonesia, Malaysia, and Vietnam, that are increasingly reliant on digital banking services in daily life activities. This study employs the normative legal research method and comparative approach to assess the key legal implications of dark patterns on banking consumers’ welfare and how the existing relevant frameworks are responding to this significant threat. Analyses made throughout the study highlight that all three jurisdictions exhibit a bifurcated inadequacy where general consumer protection laws lack digital-specific application mechanisms, while banking regulations prioritize prudential soundness over interface-level manipulation. Despite the divergent nature of the gaps found, UI/UX interface regulation remains the biggest gap that all three countries are dealing with, which is the primary manifestation of dark patterns. The study recommends establishing mandatory interface design standards supervised by regulatory authorities capable of imposing ex ante structural obligations on banks, to ensure that consumer welfare remains the paramount importance in ever-so-essential digital banking services.
Benefit Sharing as a Legal Protection Mechanism for Traditional Cultural Expressions: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Malaysia under International Law Susanti Susanti; Hari Sutra Disemadi; Elza Syarief
Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 28 No. 1 (2026): June 2026 (Articles in Press)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v28i1.12412

Abstract

This study examines the benefit-sharing mechanism as an instrument for the protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs) from the perspective of international law through a comparative analysis between Indonesia and Malaysia. TCEs constitute part of intangible cultural heritage that embodies economic, social, spiritual, and collective identity values of indigenous communities, yet they remain vulnerable to exploitation and misappropriation without fair distribution of benefits to their rightful custodians. This research aims to analyze the regulation of benefit sharing concerning TCEs in Indonesia and Malaysia, assess its conformity with principles of international law, and formulate an ideal regulatory model for TCE protection. The study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The legal materials consist of international instruments such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the Nagoya Protocol, UNDRIP, and WIPO-IGC documents, as well as national regulations of Indonesia and Malaysia concerning cultural protection and communal intellectual property rights. The findings indicate that both Indonesia and Malaysia have provided normative recognition of TCEs; however, benefit-sharing arrangements remain partial and lack operational mechanisms. Indonesia emphasizes cultural preservation and recognition of indigenous communities, while Malaysia adopts a more pragmatic approach through specific regulatory initiatives and cultural commercialization. Nevertheless, both countries have not fully implemented the principles of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) and Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) as developed under international law. This study proposes a responsive law-based benefit-sharing model that positions indigenous communities as the primary legal subjects through meaningful participation, recognition of collective rights, transparency, and equitable and sustainable distribution of benefits.
Copyright Regulation of AI-Generated Works : A Comparative Study of Indonesia, the United States, and Germany Agustianto; Sherney Z.; Hari Sutra Disemadi
Vifada Assumption Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): January - June
Publisher : Yayasan Vifada Cendikia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70184/54n6fg88

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines copyright regulation in the era of AI through a comparative legal analysis between Indonesia, the United States, and Germany, with the primary aim of analyzing how the copyright regulatory frameworks in the three countries accommodate AI-generated works and to identify regulatory gaps that may hinder legal certainty in the context of generative AI. Research Design and Methodology: This study uses normative legal research methods with statutory and comparative legal approaches, analyzing legal implications of AI-generated works and conducting an assessment of the relevant primary law sources.  Findings and Discussion: Findings highlight that Germany stands out as the most advanced through the amendment of UrhG and the adoption of the DSM Directive, while the United States follows with clear output regulation through USCO policies. Indonesia lags behind, still relying on Law No. 28 of 2014’s rather classical understanding of copyrights. The research identifies two major gaps that create legal challenges: regulatory preparedness and legal uncertainty around output and input layers. Implications: This study recommends a two-layer reform direction for Indonesian copyright law by proposing clearer rules on AI-generated outputs and the use of copyrighted works as AI training inputs, drawing from the United States’ human authorship and Germany’s text and data mining framework. The contribution of this study lies in its addition to the growing body of literature around generative AI in the legal sphere and practical implications for future legal development.
Digital Advertising as a Threat to Consumer Privacy: A Comparative Legal Analysis Nurlaily Nurlaily; Lu Sudirman; Mimi Sintia Mohd Bajury; Hari Sutra Disemadi; Ninne Zahara Silviani
QONUN: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-undangan Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : FASYA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/qj.v9i2.12656

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital advertising as a key component of the digital economy has intensified concerns over the protection of personal data and privacy rights. The primary legal problem addressed in this research is the inability of Indonesia’s current data protection framework to adequately regulate data-driven digital advertising practices and prevent unlawful identification of individuals, particularly when compared to South Korea’s more advanced regulatory regime. This study aims to comparatively analyze the legal frameworks governing personal data and privacy protection in digital advertising in Indonesia and South Korea and to propose a legal development model for Indonesia. This research employs a normative legal research method using a comparative statutory approach, focusing on Indonesia’s Law on Personal Data Protection and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act, along with its enforcement regulations. Legal norms are examined through statutory provisions and supported by relevant legal and academic literature. The findings demonstrate substantial regulatory disparities between the two countries. South Korea has established a comprehensive and technologically responsive legal framework, incorporating detailed data classification, recognition of pseudonymized data, strict profiling limitations, and strong institutional enforcement. In contrast, Indonesia’s legal framework remains structurally limited, relies heavily on undelivered implementing regulations, and insufficiently addresses indirect identification and advanced data-processing practices in digital advertising. This study proposes targeted legal reforms for Indonesia, including the integration of pseudonymization, enhanced data classification, criminalization of unlawful identification, and mandatory tracking notifications to strengthen privacy protection in the digital advertising ecosystem.
PENAMBANGAN PASIR SECARA ILEGAL DI BATAM, INDONESIA: ANALISIS YURIDIS PERSPEKTIF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS (SDGs) Hari Sutra Disemadi; Cory Bill Garden Nababan
JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 8, No 4 (2021): JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/justitia.v8i4.505-516

Abstract

Pertambangan merupakan sumber daya alam yang tidak dapat diperbaharui sehingga harus dikelola sebaik mungkin, efisien dan transparan serta memperhatikan dampak lingkungan yang ditimbulkan dari aktivitas pertambangan tersebut. Maraknya penambangan pasir secara ilegal yang terjadi di Batam, Indonesia tentunya dapat menimbulkan kerusakan lingkungan. Hal ini yang sangat bertentangan dengan prinsip dan tujuan Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) atau tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan dan bertentaangan dengan “Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup”. Penelitian hukum normatif ini akan mengkaji penambangan pasir secara ilegal perspektif SDGs di Batam, Indonesia. Seharusnya kegiatan pertambangan harus memperhatikan prinsip lingkungan. Penambangan pasir secara ilegal atau tidak memiliki izin dinilai akan merusak lingkungan disekitar area pertambangan yang berdampak pada tidak tercapainya target pembangunan berkelanjutan yang direncanakan oleh pemerintah pusat.
Regulatory Gaps in Data Protection and Proportionality in Digital Banking: Legal Issues in ASEAN Agustianto Agustianto; Michael T. Sacramed; Winda Fitri; Nadia Carolina Weley; Hari Sutra Disemadi
Syura: Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Darul Ulum Banyuanyar Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58223/syura.v4i1.811

Abstract

This study examines the legal gaps in regulating data proportionality in ASEAN digital banking, particularly in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Malaysia. The main legal issue lies in the absence of clear standards governing the limitation, justification, and classification of personal data, which leads to excessive and potentially invasive data processing practices in digital banking systems. This research aims to examine the concept of data proportionality in digital banking and to assess the adequacy of legal frameworks governing data proportionality in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Malaysia in order to identify existing regulatory gaps. This study employs a normative legal research method with a comparative approach. The findings reveal that although all three countries have established data protection frameworks, none comprehensively integrate data proportionality into digital banking regulations, resulting in fragmented and ineffective legal protection. Indonesia lacks detailed standards and risk-based mechanisms, while the Philippines and Malaysia show regulatory gaps in governing conventional digital banking services. These weaknesses contribute to increased risks of privacy violations and legal uncertainty. Therefore, this study suggests the need for regulatory reform, including clearer data classification, proportionality standards, and mandatory risk assessments, to ensure a balance between digital banking innovation and the protection of consumer privacy rights.
ETHICAL BOUNDARIES OF GENETIC ENGINEERING PATENTS IN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA Hari Sutra Disemadi; Nor Akhmal Hasmin; David Tan; Windi Afdal; Nadia Carolina Weley
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 55, No 1 (2026): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.55.1.2026.148-170

Abstract

Genetic engineering increasingly pushes the boundaries of science, technology, and ethics by raising difficult questions about the acceptable limits of human intervention in living organisms. Its relationship with intellectual property law is particularly complex because patent protection is intended to reward innovation and encourage scientific development, while also being constrained by ethical limits expressed through ordre public and morality principles. This study examines how Indonesian and Malaysian intellectual property law regulate patent protection for genetic engineering inventions, particularly in relation to ethical safeguards. Using doctrinal legal research with a comparative approach, this study analyses the relevant patent statutes, legal concepts, and regulatory structures in both jurisdictions. The findings show that Indonesia provides a relatively stronger legal basis than Malaysia, mainly because its patent framework contains more developed definitions concerning invention, technology, and scientific methods. These definitions create broader conceptual space for recognising genetic engineering as a patentable field while also allowing ethical considerations to be developed through implementing regulations. However, Indonesia still lacks concrete examination standards and operational mechanisms for assessing ethical risks in genetic engineering patents. Malaysia, by contrast, recognises ordre public and morality clauses only at a general level and primarily uses them as grounds for refusing patent applications. Its legal framework also provides only limited acknowledgement of the patentability of genetic engineering inventions, especially in relation to microorganisms, without establishing a clear ethical review mechanism. This study argues that both jurisdictions require stronger normative and institutional safeguards to ensure that patent protection for genetic engineering does not undermine public morality, human dignity, environmental integrity, or broader public interest. Indonesia should develop implementing regulations and patent-examination guidelines that translate its broader amended patent definitions into concrete ethical safeguards. Malaysia should amend the Patents Act 1983 to provide an explicit ethical review mechanism for genetic-engineering-derived microorganism patents and clearer standards for applying ordre public and morality exclusions.
Intellectual Property Challenges for AI-Driven Creativity: A Focus on Copyright and Patents in Emerging Economies Lu Sudirman; Hari Sutra Disemadi; Henry Soelistyo Budi; Jihyun Park; Ninne Zahara Silviani
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): May, 2025: Law, Technology, and Globalization: Challenges and Innovations in th
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i1.20611

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into scientific advancements has become a crucial part of daily life for many people. In the creative industry, AI has the potential to not only enhance the level of creativity, but also productivity. The legal implications of this development must be carefully analyzed for the development of the creative industry, to establish a legal position on where AI stands in the increasingly competitive market, especially when Intellectual Property Right (IPR) as a key factor is taken into account. This research examines the need for a legal framework for AI. It was conducted through the lens of intellectual property law, to determine its place within existing IPR regimes using the comparative legal method. The results conceptually justify the urgency to regulate AI, and highlights the taxonomy dilemma of AI-generated works within the current dynamics of the creative industry, indicating a taxonomy dilemma. Further analysis also indicates that while there’s a decent urgency to address all of the normative issues that exist within Indonesia’s IPR legal framework, it’s imperative that Indonesia prioritizes the development of the copyright and patent regimes, which are closely related to the nature of AI-generated works.
Co-Authors A Janurita Tenripada A Salman Maggalatung, A Salman Abdurrakhman Alhakim Abigail Natalia Bukit Absori Absori Ade Borami Ju Ade Borami Ju Adristy, Baiq Shefania Afifa, Zaynulia Agustianto Agustianto Agustianto Agustianto Agustianto, Agustianto Ahmad Alveyn Sulthony Ananda Ahmad Rofiq, Ahmad Ainabila, Salsa Siti Aini Rahmadani Alhakim, Abdurrakhman Anak Agung Istri Sri Wiadnyani Anakotta , Marthsian Yeksi Anastasya Pakpahan Anastya Putri Andarini, Retno Ang Terina Angel Tng Angelica Cleryn Cesy Ani Purwanti Anthony Tan Appludnopsanji Appludnopsanji Aprilia, Aliyyah Arief Afdala Pratito Arief Budiono Arwa Meida Aninda Asep Syarifuddin Hidayat, Asep Syarifuddin Asiyah Jamilah Attamimi, Zeehan Fuad Auralita, Lala Aurelia, Jennifer Ayen Sephia Dhani Ayudistira Amanda Ayunda, Rahmi Azahrah, Wahida Bachtiar, Ronald Reagan Jap Bajury, Mimi Sintia Mohd Barda Nawawi Arief Calvin Calvin Chairunnisa Chairunnisa Chornelia Ruth Lakalapai Chutia, Upankar Cindy Anggelia Cindy Kang Cindy Meissa Jovanka Sihotang Citra Citra Cory Bill Garden Nababan Cynthia Putri Guswandi Dandy Satyahadi Danial Gomes Daniel Daniel David Tan Dedi Jaya Defi Arika Delfi Aurelia Kuasa Delvin Delvin Delystina Delystina Denis Oxy Handika Denny Denny Denny Prasetyo Dhani, Ayen Sephia Diba, Nabilah Farah Dinda Ferdeny Putri Dwi Budi Santoso Dwiki Surya Pratama Efin Efin Elva Elva Elza Syarief, Elza Erni Erni Fathan Fauzan Azima Febby Amanda Pakpahan Febriyani, Emiliya Fientery Fientery Fiqih, Geizka Orillia Fiqqih Anugerah Fitri, Winda Fransisca Kewa Qua Garcia, Virginia Gerline Vania Girsang, Junimart Gomes, Danial Gubanov, Konstantin Habidin, Nurul Fadly Hakim, Teja Maulana Handika, Denis Oxy Hanifah Ghafila Romadona Hazwan Azrielyanto Hendryani Hendryani Hendryani, Hendryani Heni Utari Setianingrum Henry Soelistyo Budi Henry Soelistyo Budi, Henry Soelistyo Hutauruk, Rufinus Hotmaulana Ida Bagus Rahmadi Supancana Ilena Nurpavitia Indra Afgha Anjani Irwan Sugiarto Jacelyn Jacelyn Jacelyn, Jacelyn Jamilah, Asiyah Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra Jerryen, Jerryen Jeslin Jeslin Jessca Jessca Jessca Jessca Jessca, Jessca Jessica Sim Jihyun Park Joel Jordan Tobing Jonkarlo, Edson Junior Ikhlas Kang, Cindy Karim, Justin Joy Kartika Sasi Wahyuningrum Kelvin Jonatan Kendry Tan Khelvin Risandi Kholis Roisah Kurniawan, Syukri Lau, Suryasan Lee, Michelle Leonardo, Steven Librawenson, Winco Lidia Kando Br Gea Lie, Cindie Lu Sudirman Lu Sudirman M. Rahmat Hidayat Mahfudzotin Nikmah Malau, Hotmaulina Manurung, Kevin John Paul Marici, Alice Angela Marsellia, Dini Marsudi, Irvan Ricardo Mawarni Mawarni Mawarni Mawarni Melani Melani Merizqa Ariani Metta Noviani Michael T. Sacramed Mimi Sintia Mohd Bajury Moh. Indra Bangsawan Muhammad Deovan Reondy Putra Muhammad Deovan Reondy Putra Muhammad Farhan Muhammad Ikhsan Kasturi Muna Ulya Mustamin, Wiranto Nadia Carolina Weley Nadia Carolina Weley Nadia Carolina Weley Nadia Carolina Weley Nadia Lysion Naila Mataya Dinanthi Ningsih, Ayup Suran Nisa Nurfitri Nopiana Nopiana Nor Akhmal Hasmin Novi Wahyu Riwayanti Novi Wira Sartika Zebua Novika, Giofanni Dian Novit Cahyesi Duha Nur Fatihah Nur Rochaeti, Nur Nurfitri, Nisa Nurlaily Nurlaily NURLAILY, NURLAILY Nurul Istiqomah Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya Oda Ignatius Besar Hariyanto, Oda Ignatius Besar Olivia, Devrina Oshin Maretha Napitupulu Paramita Prananingtyas Pramudya Wardhana, Raka Pratama, Angkat Poenta Pratama, Dwiki Surya Puteri Ariesta Nadia Putra Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putri, Arya Salsabila Auliana Putri, Tasya Raehan Annisa Putunezar, Shaeku Rafif Shagufta Rahmad Setyawan Rahman, Maria Puteri Rahmi Ayunda Raihan Radinka Yusuf Ranty Angriyani Harahap Ratih Anggraini, Ratih Regent Regent, Regent Reni Putri Anggraeni Revlina Salsabila Roselvia Reyvan Gautama Putra Rifqi Arrafif Rindiyani, Monica Rio Sandra Guari Rizky Ramadhan Romadona, Hanifah Ghafila Royce, Charles Rudolf Haiti Rusdiana, Shelvi Ryan Wijaya, Ryan Sahat F. Rivai Lumban Toruan Sahuri Lasmadi Satyahadi, Dandy Selfiana Pancalina Inarkombu Selina, Selina Shaleh, Ali Ismail Shella Novianti Sherney Z. Shirley Lauren Sholahuddin Al-Fatih Sihombing, Dame Afrina Sihombing, Dame Afrina Silviani, Ninne Zahara Sirait, Regina Ulianna Siti Aisyah Situmeang, Ampuan Sofia Sofia, Sofia Stan ley Stefanus Imanuel Malik Steven Steven Steven Steven Sudirman,, Lu Sujati Winata, Agung Sulastri Sulastri Suryasan Lau Susanti Susanti Suyani Suyani Syasya Tri Puspita Dewi Syukri Kurniawan Tampubolon, Theresia Tan, David Tan, Kendry Tan, Sebastian Tan, Winsherly Tania, Stephanie Taniady, Vicko Terina, Ang Tobing, Joel Jordan Tomi Suhendra Pardede Triana Dewi Seroja Trifena Pang Udu, Jericho Velany Kosasih Verlina Verlina Vick Sandro Situmorang Vicko Taniady Vivian Vivian Weley, Nadia Carolina Widiyanti Wijaya Fu Wilton Goh Winarso, Teguh Windi Afdal Windi Afdal, Windi Winnie Stevani Wisely Wisely Yongkie Yongkie You Landa Sinaga Yunus, Nur Rohim Yusro, Mochammad Abizar Yusuf, Raihan Radinka Zakiyah, Ninik