Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
13.651
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Teknik Sipil dan Arsitektur Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) Pixel : Jurnal Ilmiah Komputer Grafis Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat AbdiMas JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Arsitektur Corruptio Journal of Architectural Design and Development (JAD) Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Arsitekta Interdisciplinary Social Studies Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Journal of Social Research Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat : Pemberdayaan, Inovasi dan Perubahan Ius Positum: Journal of Journal Of Law Theory And Law Enforcement Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi dan Sosial Politik NALAR: Journal Of Law and Sharia Journal of Architecture and Human Experience Journal of Innovative and Creativity JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Ruang Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Tijarah Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara COSMOS Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum Referendum Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum Dan Administrasi Publik Wissen: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi PESHUM Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan hukum Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Publikasi Penelitian Ilmiah INLAW
Wiraguna, Sidi Ahyar
Universitas Esa Unggul
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 113 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 113 Documents
Search

 8   9   10   11   12 
Sanksi Hukum Mengungkap Data Diri Sesorang Dan Membagikannya Di Sosial Media Atau Doxing (Dalam Perspektif Undang- Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi) Faris Dhafin Razaqa Alwani; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Indonesian Journal of Law Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): INLAW - MEI 2025
Publisher : PT. INOVASI TEKNOLOGI KOMPUTER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis secara komprehensif sanksi hukum terhadap praktik pengungkapan dan penyebaran data pribadi tanpa persetujuan, atau doxing, di ranah digital, dengan fokus pada implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah yuridis-normatif, yang menitikberatkan pada telaah peraturan perundang-undangan sebagai sumber acuan utama, khususnya Undang-Undang Pelindungan Data Pribadi, untuk memahami permasalahan hukum yang timbul. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang-Undang Pelindungan Data Pribadi mengisi kekosongan regulasi sebelumnya, seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik yang seringkali dinilai sebagai "pasal karet", melalui definisi yang lebih jelas tentang istilah data pribadi dan menetapkan konsekuensi hukum yang tegas bagi pelanggar. Tindakan doxing diklasifikasikan sebagai pelanggaran pemrosesan data pribadi secara ilegal, Pelanggaran terhadap asas keabsahan, keadilan dan transparansi pengolahan data, sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 20 Undang-Undang Pelindungan Data Pribadi. Undang-Undang Pelindungan Data Pribadi mengatur sanksi pidana yang signifikan, Hukuman maksimal bagi siapa saja yang dengan sengaja dan melawan hukum mengungkapkan data pribadi yang bukan milik Anda adalah pidana penjara paling lama 4 tahun dan/atau denda paling banyak Rp. 4.000.000.000,00 (empat miliar rupiah). Selain itu, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi juga memperkenalkan berbagai jenis sanksi administratif, yang mencerminkan pendekatan komprehensif negara tersebut dalam melindungi data pribadi. Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi juga memperkuat hak-hak subjek data, seperti hak untuk menerima informasi, menarik persetujuan terhadap pemrosesan data pribadi, membatasi pemrosesan dan mencari kompensasi, sehingga memberikan mekanisme perlindungan dan perbaikan yang lebih kuat bagi korban doxing
Substantive Transparency of Judicial Review Decisions in Digital Constitutional Platforms Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna; Hayattun Nufus; Fina Faiqotul Azizah
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v9i3.14264

Abstract

This study examines the substantive transparency of judicial review decisions on the Constitutional Court’s digital platform within the framework of good constitutional governance. The research addresses a critical gap in existing scholarship and regulatory practice, which predominantly emphasize administrative transparency and procedural digitalization while neglecting the accessibility and comprehensibility of constitutional legal reasoning (ratio decidendi). Using a normative-policy approach, the study combines regulatory analysis of Constitutional Court Regulation No. 8 of 2019 and No. 10 of 2023, doctrinal examination of selected constitutional review decisions, and conceptual analysis grounded in legal informatics and open justice principles. The findings demonstrate that the current digital platform primarily functions as an administrative repository and fails to ensure substantive transparency due to the absence of structured reasoning disclosure, semantic information architecture, standardized explanatory formats, and cognitively accessible legal communication. Consequently, digital transparency remains formally compliant yet substantively limited in promoting constitutional accountability and democratic participation. The novelty of this research lies in the development of an integrative analytical framework connecting jurisprudential theory, legal informatics, and constitutional governance through the dimensions of clarity, structure, consistency, and accessibility as indicators of substantive judicial transparency. This study contributes theoretically by redefining digital judicial platforms as normative instruments of democratic constitutional accountability and practically by proposing governance-oriented standards for ratio decidendi disclosure, semantic tagging, user-centered platform design, and participatory transparency mechanisms in constitutional adjudication.
Harmonisasi Hukum Acara Perdata dan Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Dualisme Namira, Amanda Jihan; Wiraguna, Sidi Ahyar
AHKAM Vol 4 No 4 (2025): AHKAM: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v4i4.8277

Abstract

Disputes containing both civil law and administrative law elements often generate a dualism of judicial jurisdiction due to the lack of clear boundaries between the general courts and the Administrative Court (PTUN), a situation exacerbated by normative inconsistencies, overlapping regulations, and divergent judicial interpretations, so that a single object of dispute may be examined under two legal regimes simultaneously and thereby create legal uncertainty. This study aimed to analyze the points of intersection between civil procedural law and PTUN procedural law, identify obstacles arising in mixed-element disputes, and formulate theoretical solutions for harmonizing jurisdiction. The research employed a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through the analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The findings show that jurisdictional dualism primarily occurs in disputes over government contracts, procurement of goods and services, and revocation of business licenses, which simultaneously contain private and administrative aspects, while the lack of synchronization in evidentiary mechanisms and the differing orientations of dispute resolution between the general courts and PTUN reinforce the potential for dual forums. The study concludes that harmonization is required through the strengthening of rules on subject-matter jurisdiction, the application of limited forum prorogatum, the establishment of an integrated court model, and the consistent development of jurisprudence. The implications of this research affirm that the alignment of procedural laws is a crucial prerequisite for ensuring legal certainty, enhancing the efficiency of dispute resolution, and strengthening public trust in the judicial system.
Co-Authors Achmad Edi Subiyanto Ade Hari Siswanto Adzaky Luthfi Radiant Ahmad Redi Aida Hanan Putri Salsabil Akmalia Salsabila Al Satria Diah Alamsyah, Rizki Alarode Lahoya Simbolon Alezra Pramesti Bonde Alfiana, Rita Alisya Putri Santoso Aliza Yasmin Yusuf Alvarindo, Arif Amanda Jihan Namira Anatomi Muliawan Andika Nugraha Santoso Anesya Fritiana Anisyah Sutopo, Hanan Anita Anita Anna Triningsih Annisa Fitria Annisa Nurmalasari Hutapea Antika Gestia Arkaan Daffa Astri Anggraeni Putri Athaya Alghaniyyu Rahmatulloh Athaya Alghaniyyu Rahmatulloh Atmojo, Talitha Maheswari Ning AYU WULANDARI Ayu Wulandari Azis, Rizka Amelia Aziz, Rizka Amelia Bahtiar Hamza Bella Fistya Asherli Berto Purnomo Sidik Brandi Stefano Pedo Chresto Eirene Citra Winona Daishahwa Daishahwa, Daishahwa Daniel Tata Gabe Darman, Melani Delvi Eka Ariyanti Dhiyaksa Nugraha Dio Fredrick Hezekiel Sitorus Edward, Ryan Fransisco Effendy, D. Andry Elda Septi Darmayanti Elda Septi Darmayanti Eliza Yuniar Elvina Putri Maheswari Fadia Intan Sutisna Faiqotul, Fina Faisal Santiago Faisal Santiago, Faisal Fakrulloh, Zudan Arief Farha Nadiah Faris Dhafin Razaqa Alwani Fariz Amrullah Hakim Feriza, Gousta Fika Nurmajulia Andiani Fika Nurmajulia Andiani Filal Khair Fina Faiqotul Azizah Fitri, Gischa Adelia Fransisca Elia Merry Paskah Mangunsong Fritiana, Anesya Galuh Candra Utami Harahap, Pardamaian Hartanto, Annisa Ramadhani Hayattun Nufus Henry Arianto Hikmawati, Elok Hutapea, Annisa Nurmalasari I Gede Hartadi Kurniawan I Made Kanthika Intan Nazili Irdanuraprida, Irdanuraprida Irmanjaya Thaher Ismaya Rahailia Nasution Juanda Juanda Kantikha, I Made Khetrina Maria Angnesia Kusuma Daniel Kusnadi Kusuma Daniel Kusnadi L. M. F. Purwanto L.M.F Purwanto L.M.F Purwanto L.M.F. Purwanto Lenatia, Lenatia Lengkong, Ivany Lianto, Fermanto Mangunsong, Fransisca Elia Merry Paskah Maryanih Maryanih Maryanih Meiddy Dwi Darmawan Meiddy Dwi Darmawan Mochamad Yulian Fadhli Saputra Mugiono Mugiono, Mugiono Muhamad Aldika Adha Wirya Muhammad Raydafi Alfadillah Nadiroh, Aenun Namira, Amanda Jihan Naswa Fiolla Anggraini Naya Indah Sahqia Nayla Azzahra Khaerunnisa Nazarudin Khuluk Nova Reana Wahida Nufus, Hayattun Nugraha, Karindra Alvian Nur Ramadhan Alqadr Nurhayani nurhayani Pardamean Harahap Parlin Jonatan Panjaitan Pedo, Brandi Stefano Pratama, Muhamad Noval Faris Priscila, Michel Purwanti, Yani Purwanto, L.M.F Putri, Ramadani Rahmadani, Nita Octaviana Reysha Aurelia Shabilla Reysha Aurelia Shabilla Rosalia Eka Kurnia Nurcahyani Ruth Elleny Savana Maulia Sekar Galuh Ardelia Seroja Rizki Amelia Shafa Salsabila Shifa Arifatunnisa Shilvy Anggraini Sri Mulyati Sultan Reza Islami Sultan Reza Islami Suprajogi, Agus Suryajaya Hakim Sutopo Syifa Ramadani Talitha Kamilah Theo Prapaskah Verina Dwi Muryani Wardhani, Dwi Kusumo Wasis Susetio Widiatno, Men Wih Winda Agustina Wyanda Kinanti Syauqi Ramadhani Yaffa Ivana Faustina Yani Purwanti Yunesia Amelia Renanta Yunesia Amelia Renanta Yunita Sari, Kamelia Zhillan Zalzabilla Albana Zudan Arief Fakrulloh Zulfikar Judge