Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
11.813
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Arena Hukum Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Akta Jurnal Panorama Hukum JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) Jurnal Ius Constituendum WAJAH HUKUM Unes Law Review Jurnal Yuridis Veteran Law Review DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal el-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial Santhet: (Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora) SIGn Jurnal Hukum SABDAMAS Journal Civics and Social Studies Abdi Masyarakat JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Esensi Hukum Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Darmabakti : Junal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law UNISKA LAW REVIEW Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat Amsir Law Jurnal (ALJ) Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Sultan Jurisprudence : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Law Development Journal International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Media Bina Ilmiah Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Jurnal Relasi Publik Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara MULTIPLE: Journal of Global and Multidisciplinary Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal Aladalah: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia LamLaj Aksi Kita: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Melayunesia Law
Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 99 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 99 Documents
Search

 6   7   8   9   10 
Analisis Wanprestasi dan Penerapan Klausul Non-Competition dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1785 K/Pdt/2023 Alysha, Nabila; Rahmadani, Fitri; Prabandari, Ditia; Alicia, Hana; Manohara, Safa; Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17866260

Abstract

This article analyzes the relationship between breach of contract (wanprestasi) and the enforcement of non-competition clauses in employment agreements, using the Supreme Court Decision Number 1785 K/Pdt/2023 as the main reference. The research aims to examine three core aspects: (1) the legal status of post-employment obligations as binding performance, (2) the determination of prohibited actions within non-competition clauses, and (3) the limitation of contractual liability only to parties who expressly bind themselves under the principle of privity of contract. The method used is normative juridical analysis through statutory interpretation, judicial reasoning, and doctrinal review. The study finds that non-competition clauses constitute negative performance that continues to bind workers even after the employment relationship ends, as long as the clause is clearly formulated and mutually agreed upon. The Supreme Court affirms that any form of involvement direct or indirect with a competitor within the agreed period constitutes breach of contract. However, contractual liability cannot be extended to third parties unless they actively participate in the breach. The findings highlight the need for proportionality, clarity of scope, and fairness in enforcing non-competition clauses within Indonesia’s legal framework.
Civil Liability of Hospitals for Tort Law of Swapped Babies: A Comparative Analysis between Indonesia and Malaysia Sherlyta Ramadhani; Dwi Aryanti Ramadhani
Melayunesia Law Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Melayunesia Law
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/d8tj3r03

Abstract

This article examines the civil liability of hospitals in cases of swapped babies through a comparative analysis between Indonesia and Malaysia, focusing on the formulation of the elements of unlawful acts and the forms of responsibility of both countries. This issue is important because negligence in infant identification not only causes material and psychological losses but also impacts children's civil rights and reduces public trust in health services. The research method used is normative juridical research with a comparative legal approach. The main findings of this paper indicate that Indonesia assesses cases of swapped babies through the elements of unlawful acts, while Malaysia uses the tort of negligence approach. This difference gives rise to practical liability, where Indonesia tends to emphasize proving the elements of unlawful acts formally, while Malaysia provides broader scope for the standard of care test through jurisprudence. Furthermore, Malaysia has a more varied scope of compensation, while Indonesia limits the form of compensation to material and non-material losses within the limits of propriety. These findings are important for strengthening patient safety standards and hospital accountability mechanisms to be more adaptive to complex immaterial losses. The results of this study can also be used as a guideline for further research.
Legal Review of Marriages based on Religious Beliefs Not Recognized by The State in Indonesia Quratuainniza, Happy Sturaya; Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.48785

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of marriage recognition for followers of indigenous religions, including those formally recognised by the State and those not recognised, and the legal consequences in certain situations. In Indonesia, interfaith marriages are often considered valid under their respective traditions and beliefs. Still, they are not officially recognised by the State, as Marriage Law Number 1 of 1974 recognised only six religions. This difference has led to various legal issues, including uncertainty about the couple’s marital status and their children, loss of inheritance rights, and obstacles to using public facilities and administrative processes. This study employs a normative legal approach, with a specific focus on the Constitutional Court’s decisions. The results of marriages show that legal recognition of marriages between members of indigenous religions remains limited and does not guarantee legal equality. According to the analysis, amending the Marriage Law and Population Administration Law to promote greater inclusivity regarding customary belief systems is a viable solution. The novelty of this research lies in the conflict between Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law and Constitutional Court Decision Number: 146/PUU-XXII/2024, which states that believers are entitled to administrative recognition if their teachings and worship practices are deemed similar or closest to one of the religions recognised by the State. Thus, legal equality cannot be achieved through court decisions in a civil law system.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemisahan Harta Bersama Setelah Dibuatnya Perjanjian Kawin Dalam Masa Perkawinan Erina Nur Afifa; Dwi Aryanti Ramadhani
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.12993

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal implications and dispute resolution mechanisms concerning the division of joint marital property following the recognition of postnuptial agreements made during marriage after Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015. The decision marked a significant shift in Indonesian marriage law by allowing spouses to conclude marital agreements not only before or at the time of marriage but also during the subsistence of marriage, thereby introducing greater contractual flexibility in property arrangements. Employing a normative juridical research method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, this study examines the legal force of postnuptial agreements and their consequences for spouses and third parties. The findings indicate that postnuptial agreements are legally valid instruments for separating joint property only if they are formally registered; otherwise, they bind the spouses internally and do not affect third parties such as creditors. Disputes arising from joint property separation may be resolved through litigation, which offers stronger legal certainty, or through non-litigation mechanisms that emphasize efficiency and amicable settlement. The novelty of this study lies in its focused analysis of dispute resolution models arising specifically from postnuptial agreements, highlighting the crucial role of registration and notarial involvement in ensuring legal certainty, fairness, and balanced protection for all parties within Indonesia’s marital property regime.   Penelitian ini menganalisis implikasi hukum serta mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa pemisahan harta bersama akibat pembuatan perjanjian kawin dalam masa perkawinan pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015. Putusan tersebut menandai perubahan mendasar dalam hukum perkawinan Indonesia dengan memberikan ruang bagi suami istri untuk menyusun perjanjian perkawinan tidak hanya sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan, tetapi juga selama perkawinan berlangsung, sehingga meningkatkan fleksibilitas pengaturan harta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual untuk mengkaji kekuatan hukum perjanjian kawin pascanikah serta dampaknya terhadap para pihak dan pihak ketiga. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perjanjian kawin yang dibuat dalam masa perkawinan hanya memiliki kekuatan hukum penuh apabila dicatatkan secara resmi; tanpa pencatatan, perjanjian tersebut hanya mengikat secara internal dan tidak berlaku terhadap pihak ketiga seperti kreditur. Sengketa yang timbul dapat diselesaikan melalui jalur litigasi yang memberikan kepastian hukum lebih kuat atau melalui non-litigasi yang lebih efisien dan berorientasi pada perdamaian. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada penekanan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang secara spesifik timbul dari perjanjian kawin pascanikah serta pentingnya peran pencatatan dan notaris dalam menjamin kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan keseimbangan perlindungan bagi seluruh pihak dalam rezim harta perkawinan di Indonesia.
Implementasi Asas Keseimbangan Pada Perjanjian Pranikah Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Rivaldi, Chika Aurel; Dwi Aryanti Ramadhani
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.13073

Abstract

This study analyzes the application of the principle of balance in prenuptial agreements as a form of legal protection for prospective spouses, based on the Denpasar District Court Decision Number 1308/Pdt.G/2019/PN Dps. The research is motivated by the gap between the normative regulation of the principle of balance in contract law and the practice of prenuptial agreements, which often places one party in a vulnerable position, resulting in an imbalance of rights and obligations and affecting the validity and binding force of such agreements. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through an analysis of court decisions. The findings indicate that the principle of balance was not optimally applied due to defects of consent arising from differences in language comprehension, contradictory and biased contractual clauses, and the implementation of the agreement that concentrated economic benefits on one party while imposing risks on the other, thereby undermining the validity of the prenuptial agreement and justifying its annulment. The novelty of this study lies in formulating the principle of balance as a three-dimensional evaluative tool covering the formation process, the substance of contractual clauses, and the implementation of prenuptial agreements, examined comprehensively through judicial decisions. This study affirms that the principle of balance constitutes a substantive limit to freedom of contract and a fundamental basis for ensuring fair legal protection for both prospective spouses.   Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis penerapan asas keseimbangan dalam perjanjian pranikah sebagai instrumen perlindungan hukum bagi calon suami dan istri berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 1308/Pdt.G/2019/PN Dps. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasarkan pada adanya kesenjangan antara pengaturan normatif asas keseimbangan dalam hukum perjanjian dan praktik perjanjian pranikah yang kerap menempatkan salah satu pihak pada posisi rentan, sehingga menimbulkan ketimpangan hak dan kewajiban serta berimplikasi pada keabsahan dan kekuatan mengikat perjanjian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus melalui analisis terhadap putusan pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa asas keseimbangan tidak diterapkan secara optimal karena adanya cacat kehendak akibat perbedaan pemahaman bahasa, rumusan klausul yang kontradiktif dan berat sebelah, serta pelaksanaan perjanjian yang memusatkan manfaat ekonomi pada satu pihak sementara pihak lain menanggung seluruh risiko, sehingga melemahkan keabsahan perjanjian pranikah dan menjadi dasar pembatalannya. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada perumusan asas keseimbangan sebagai alat uji tiga aspek, yaitu proses pembentukan perjanjian, substansi klausul, dan pelaksanaan perjanjian, yang dianalisis secara komprehensif berbasis putusan pengadilan. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa asas keseimbangan merupakan batas substantif kebebasan berkontrak dan fondasi penting dalam mewujudkan perlindungan hukum yang adil bagi kedua calon mempelai.
Analisis Perbandingan Implementasi Kepentingan Terbaik Anak Dalam Proses Adopsi Di Indonesia Dan Irlandia Putri Nabila Sahwahita; Zahrah Rani’ah Delyananda; Salsas Bila Juniyanti Tanjung; Esi Anindya Azzahra; Happy Sturaya Quratuainniza; Dwi Aryanti Ramadhani
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1704

Abstract

Pengadopsian anak memiliki sistem dan mekanisme yang berbeda di setiap negara, sejalan dengan sistem hukum yang dianut masing‑masing negara. Indonesia yang menganut sistem civil law mengatur prosedur adopsi secara ketat melalui kodifikasi dan penetapan pengadilan yang cenderung panjang dan birokratis, sementara Irlandia sebagai negara common law menyerahkan pengawasan adopsi kepada lembaga independen yang menjalankan prosedur administratif dan yudisial. Kasus adopsi lintas negara seperti Tristan Dowse mengilustrasikan tantangan hukum dalam prosedur adopsi anak. Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingkan implementasi prinsip kepentingan terbaik bagi anak dan mekanisme adopsi anak di Indonesia dan Irlandia. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan, melalui analisis kualitatif terhadap peraturan perundang‑undangan, putusan pengadilan, konvensi internasional, dan literatur terkait adopsi anak di kedua negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia menempatkan prinsip kepentingan terbaik anak dalam UU Perlindungan Anak dan PP 54/2007 melalui prosedur yang ketat dan berbasis penetapan pengadilan, namun implementasinya masih sangat formalistik. Sebaliknya, Irlandia melaksanakan prinsip tersebut melalui lembaga independen yang menilai kelayakan calon orang tua angkat dengan mekanisme administratif‑yudisial dan penekanan kuat pada kesejahteraan anak, sebagaimana tampak dalam penanganan kasus Dowse. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan lembaga pengawasan adopsi yang lebih terpusat dan independen di Indonesia, penyederhanaan prosedur dengan tolok ukur kepentingan terbaik bagi anak, serta pertimbangan untuk mengadopsi Konvensi Den Haag 1993 tentang adopsi antarnegara.
Implementasi Hak Konsumen Atas Informasi Produk Halal : Evaluasi Sistem Sertifikasi Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Produk Halal (Bpjph) Dalam Melindungi Konsumen Muslim Putri, Keisha Rafilah; Koesnaedy, Shabiya Zahra Alifa; Azz Zahra, Devyta Ardiyaning; Maharani, Nabilah Liztha; Dalida, Naumy Syauqina; Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 12 No 1.A (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Implementasi hak konsumen atas informasi mengenai produk-produk yang tercantum halal melalui sistem sertifikasi Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Produk Halal (BPJPH) di Indonesia masih menghadapi beberapa kendala, seperti kesenjangan informasi di tingkat konsumen, sosialisasi yang belum optimal, aksesibilitas sistem informasi yang perlu ditingkatkan, serta tantangan pengawasan pasca-sertifikasi. Berdasarkan analisis yuridis-empiris, efektivitas BPJPH dalam memenuhi Undang Undang tentang Perlindungan Konsumen dan Undang-Undang tentang Jaminan Produk Halal perlu ditingkatkan melalui penguatan regulasi turunan dan koordinasi antar lembaga. Beberapa rekomendasi yang dapat diberikan adalah peningkatan literasi konsumen, optimalisasi teknologi informasi, penguatan kapasitas BPJPH, serta penegasan sanksi untuk pelanggaran, sehingga implementasi hak konsumen atas informasi produk halal dapat lebih efektif. Dengan demikian, BPJPH dapat lebih efektif dalam menjalankan tugasnya sebagai pelindung konsumen dan penjamin kehalalan produk di Indonesia.
Fraud and Abuse of Circumstances as Grounds for the Annulment of Prenuptial Agreements: A Normative Analysis of Defects of Will in Indonesian Civil Law Putri, Cinta Aisyah; Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v10i2.265

Abstract

The natural human capacity for coexistence and procreation is realized through marriage, a legal bond between a man and a woman. Prenuptial agreements, which should serve as legal instruments for justly defining rights and obligations, are often misused for unilateral gain, especially when there are signs of deception or abuse of circumstances that harm one spouse. This normative juridical study aims to examine the legal standing and consequences of prenuptial agreements that mislead one of the partners, utilizing statutory and case approaches. The findings indicate that agreements containing elements of deception, either through fraud (violating subjective requirements), or those contradicting statutory law (violating objective requirements), may be annulled or declared void by law. The legal consequences include the annulment of the agreement, which reverts the asset status back to marital community property, and the potential for civil claims for compensation based on Tort (Article 1365 Civil Code) to recover losses and ensure the principle of good faith.
Penerapan teori badan hukum dalam pelaksanaan akuisisi perseroan terbatas (Studi Putusan KPPU No. 06/KPPU-M/2024) Dwi Aryanti Ramadhani; Sunandar Pramono; Army Setyo Wibowo; Wicipto Setiadi
JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)
Publisher : Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Theraphy (IICET)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/020256350

Abstract

Acquisitions of limited-liability companies (Perseroan Terbatas, PT) in Indonesia continue to rise, yet not all of them generate maximum benefit for shareholders, creditors, employees, and the public. This study examines the application of legal entity theory at every stage of an acquisition—from the pre-acquisition phase, through the transaction itself, to the post-acquisition period—and analyses how the principle of “the greatest happiness for the greatest number” can be aligned with Indonesian positive law. KPPU Decision No. 06/KPPU-M/2024 affirms that every limited liability company (PT) is an independent legal subject, so the statutory notification of an acquisition must be filed by the PT that actually exceeds the concentration threshold. Using a qualitative method and a case-study approach, this article examines how the theory of legal entity is applied in the acquisition of PT Sumber Baru Hydropower by PT Tamaris Hidro. The findings are: (i) KPPU rejected the “single economic entity” doctrine and upheld the principle of legal-entity independence; (ii) procedural factors (wrong notifying party) obstructed economic utility, while the absence of a social-impact assessment hindered social utility. The article recommends integrating a “Joint Utility Plan” as a prerequisite for the conditional no-objection letter.
Co-Authors ., Leon Abdullah, Nayla Putri Abidahsari, Irma Achmad Faidzuddin Adam Ramadhan Adinda Aristias Adinda Permana Putri Adzra Ardelia Tuasalamony Afifa, Erina Nur Afifah, Dashilfa Agus Mahardika Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Ahsanicka, Addina Sabyla Aji Lukman Ibrahim Akbar, Muhamad Dafi Akbar, Soultan Raffly Alexandra Goldine Sihombing, Yohana Alfahyan, Muhammad Raihan Alfarel Endito Putra Alicia, Hana Aliya, Nayyara Putri Alysha, Nabila Amalia, Naily Amanda Feby Sabrina Amanda, Niken Dwi Amelia, Dean Putri Amelia, Sabina Putri Anastasya Regina S.C Anastasya, Noviola Anaya P, Selma Dwi Angelina, Sandra Laudya Anjani, Risa Gia Aora Fadilla, Dea Apriliyatiningsih, Wulan Aqiila Banyu Valentara Ardian, Muhammad Fadhil Ardiansyah, Aldizar Fikri Ardianti, Aini Dhia Aristias, Adinda Army Setyo Wibowo Arofah, Muhammad Nouval Athaya Rahmawati Aulia Nadjima Aurelya Putri Alzahrah Azizah Azizah Azka Tsabitah Hamzah Azz Zahra, Devyta Ardiyaning Azzahra Hesafira Arum Rahman Azzahra, Marcella Azzahra, Viola Farica Bagaskara, Muhammad Fadhil Bambang Waluyo Beni Harmoni Harefa Beni Harmoni Harefa Berly Praditama Setiana Biantiputri, Resha Busroni, Rania Syifa Callista Anastasia Shallom Poerba Chairyatna, Muhammad Yanri Cheryl Gladisya Kafka Dalida, Naumy Syauqina Damayanti, Aulia Dwi Daniel Danil Erlangga Mahameru Dashilfa Afifah Deliana Rinasari Ghufriani Delila, Shafira Yasmin Noor Devina Yadita Dewani, Citranti Hanifah Dewanti, Tyur Regina Diah Ayu Wulandari, Diah Ayu Dian Anggi Rahayu Dian Khoreanita Pratiwi Dita, Sekar Ayu Dwi Desi Yayi Tarina Dwi Syafi'i, Azhari Dzil Izzati, Inayatu Ediani, Fasya Millatina Eirene Eva Marta Sheila Elisabet Nauli Pane Erina Nur Afifa Esi Anindya Azzahra Eunike Putri Emmanuella Fadilla, Dea Aora Fajar, Muhammad Rizky Fara Aprodita N Farchanza Haykanna Pireno Farros Friyadhi, Naufal Fauziah, Salwa Muthma’inah Fazila, Raysha Aulia Febriana, Meutia Caesar Fira Nurulnisa Firmansyah, Aldi Fitri Rahmadani, Fitri Gabriela Priscila Br Sitepu Gabriella, Theresia Garneta Rizka Camilla Ghudzamir, Akmal Gladys Trias Puspadewi Habibie, Dieva Ahmad Haki, Ardiona Raajwa Hanifah Fairuz Wibowo Happy Sturaya Quratuainniza Hariz, Fathan Harsanti, Khairunnisa Putri Haryanto, Imam Hermanto, Jessica Hermawati, Mutiara Heru Sugiyono Hindira DPS, Ratna Huda, Genthala Rafik Hutajulu, Dian Anggi Rahayu Kurnianingsih Imaniyar, Nadhira Imelda Arthameisia Manullang Imelda Vratista Immanuel Given Bintang Andhiyo Indira Yekti Widya Pramesti Insani, Gema Mutiara Islami, Diajeng Dhea Annisa Aura Ivanicevic, Johan Iwan Erar Joesoef Jasmine, Adira Mutiara Josua Kriston Nainggolan Kartika Dewi, Ulva Katrina Anggi Hasian Kaban Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba Khaila Aurellia Kharis Dwi Hevansyah Koesnaedy, Shabiya Zahra Alifa Kumalasari, Ganit Fitria Kurniawan, Zhufar Atallah Laily Maghfiroh Laily Maghfiroh Laras Medina Pranitiaz Leon, Leon Lestari, Widya Tri Liandi, Vina Verensia Lidwina Tuto Ladjar Lubis, Thondi Lufthi, Al Daffa Naufal Luqiana Halawati Maharani, Nabilah Liztha Malik, Syaiful Manohara, Safa Manullang, Imelda Arthameisia Marcella Azzahra Mashuri, Nadiyah Farhah Maylinda, Prisca Dwi Meidina Aulia Mohamad, Syafa Fattah Moses Frederick Purba Muhammad Dewanto Adi Saputra Muhammad Dewanto Adi Saputra Muhammad Hafidz Al Ayuda Muhammad Hafizh Athallah Irawan Muhammad Irfan Maulana Muhammad Rahmadzani Hidayat Muhammad Rizki Muhammad, Bhatara Eri Satya Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Muthia Sakti Mutiara N, Amanda Nada Syifa Nurulhuda Naily Amalia Nainggolan, Ruth Hanna Najwa Najwa Nasywa Awalia Putri Natasya Yadila Natasya, Amanda Mutiara Naufal, Abyan Hafizd Nauva Amanda Nawal Essam Yahia Nawalia Azahra Nayyara Putri Aliya Negara, Revolusi Shandi Nida Syahla Hanifah Nina Fitria Sukma Novel, Samirah Novyana, Hilda Nurdin, Merry Kurniawati Nurhayati, Elsa Olga Elvira Ongkowiguno, Cheryl Michaelia Patricia, Zefanya Pebrianti, Selma Dwi Anaya Perkasa, Ginze Permatasari, Audry Prabandari, Ditia Pramesti, Indira Yekti Widya Pranitiaz, Laras Medina Putra Widiyanto, Alif Putri Mufidah Putri Nabila Sahwahita Putri Ni'matul Maula Putri Pinasti Putri, Cinta Aisyah Putri, Citraresmi Widoretno Putri, Fareta Angelica Ichwana Putri, Keisha Rafilah Putri, Nasywa Awalia Putri, Naurah Arista Putri, Tiara Frianita Quratuainniza, Happy Sturaya Rachim, Muhammad Hafidz Raffi Fathin Saputra Rahel Rezky Simanjuntak Rahmadhani, Swastika Raisha Tiara Hasnakusumah Ramadani, Fathan Ramadani, Reva Fitri Ramadhani, Bunga Azalia Rangga Wira Syahputra Rasyed, Muhammad Al Resfa Klarita Trasenda Rianda Dirkareshza Ridha Wahyuni Ridha Wahyuni, Ridha Rivaldi, Chika Aurel Rizkianti, Wardani Rizqareka D, Cinta Rizqathallah, Mohamad Rifqi Rossanti Qorry Aina Ruth Destyaningrum Saarah, Arini Sabrina, Amanda Feby Sadjeli, Siti Soraya Saffanah, Arla Haiqa Saffira Aulia Salfiah, Resifani Salsas Bila Juniyanti Tanjung Samirah Novel Samuel Arthur Hulu Santusti, Emerensiana Gita Sapanah, Mawar Saputra, Rafi Rangga Satino Selvin Armynova Septini Anriwati Setyo, Pradana Adji Shaila Azalea Ramadhanti Shelomita Putri Amelia Sherlyta Ramadhani Shintauli, Margaretha Sianturi, Catherine Rosalina Simanjuntak, Cintya Hertiana Simanjuntak, Cristella Zevanya Rhadot Sitanggang, Febriola Siti Frivanty Siti Helmyati Siti Zahranissa Sheila Augusta Soultan Raffly Akbar Suherman Sukma, Nadira Fariza Sukma, Nina Fitria SULASTRI Sulastri - Sulastri Sulastri Sunandar Pramono Suryo Hadi Kusumo Syaeh, Muhammad Tunjang Syahputra, Fajar Dwi Syaiful Malik Syifadilla Subagyo Putri Sylvana Murni Deborah Hutabarat Tampubolon, Imagrace Triamorita Taupiqqurrahman Thahirah, Afifah Tiara Rebecca K.S Tjokronolo, Nabil Raditya Trasaenda, Resfa Klarita Tyur Reggina Dewanti Uliarina, Ester Victoria Utami, Safira Maharani Putri Venesia Anandita Mulya Viona Ardhanareswari Wibowo, Hanifah Fairuz Wicaksana, Dika Hikmah Widiastiwi, Alisha Reva Widya Tri Lestari Wien Sukarmini Yadila, Natasya Yosephine, Yolanda Yuliana Yuli Yuliana Yuli Wahyuningsih Zahra, Hilyah Az Zahra, Shafira El Zahrah Rani’ah Delyananda Zaini, Noer Gita Safira Zenitri Fayza Zevanya, Keisha Zhafirah Salsabila