Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
12.998
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Proceedings of Annual International Conference Syiah Kuala University - Social Sciences Chapter USU LAW JOURNAL Journal of International Law Media Teknika The 2nd Proceeding Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Abdimas Talenta : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jambe Law Journal Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan International Journal of Supply Chain Management QARDHUL HASAN: MEDIA PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Unes Law Review Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Ilmu Hukum Prima INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN LAW, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SCIENCES As-Syar'i : Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Scientia Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum NOMOI Law Review Jurnal Al-Hikmah Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Buletin Konstitusi Law_Jurnal Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh (JSPM) Journal Equity of Law and Governance Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal Islamic Circle Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review JURNAL JUSTIQA Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Journal of Finance and Business Digital (JFBD) Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin Engineering and Technology International Journal (EATIJ) International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects) AL-SULTHANIYAH Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Mahadi : Indonesia Journal of Law Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) Acta Law Journal INSPIRING LAW JOURNAL Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Journal of Environmental and Development Studies Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues LEX SOCIETAS: Journal of Law and Public Administration ULJLS
Jelly Leviza
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 192 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 192 Documents
Search

 16   17   18   19   20 
COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT WITH CIVIL LAW AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Nita Nurvita; jelly leviza
LEX SOCIETAS: Journal of Law and Public Administration Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Academic Solution Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70489/y21q8264

Abstract

Law No. 32/2009 is indeed better and more perfect when compared to the previous law, so it can be said that Law No. 32/2009 is perfect in terms of legal material regulating the environment. However, can law enforcement of this law be implemented properly, because so far there have been no government regulations or other implementing regulations, so that it will cause indecisiveness against perpetrators of environmental pollution and destruction. This is where the problem lies with the existence of Law No. 32/2009 in terms of its enforcement, so that it is a warning for law enforcement officials to carry out their obligations towards perpetrators of environmental pollution and destruction in accordance with the rules that have been clearly regulated in Law No. 32/2009. The type of legal research that the author uses in compiling this legal writing is the normative juridical research type. Environmental law enforcement can also be done through civil law. This path is not popular in Indonesia because of the protracted process in court. Almost all civil cases are attempted to the highest court for cassation because the losing parties are always dissatisfied. In fact, there is a tendency for people to deliberately delay time by always using legal efforts, even though it is unreasonable, it is usually continued with a judicial review. After the decision is made, it is still often difficult to implement. Indonesian society is in reality more familiar with its natural environment than the application of technology. The development of technology that manages natural resources must provide the greatest possible benefits for the welfare of the people, while still paying attention to its balance and sustainability so that it remains beneficial for future generations. By paying attention to the quality of nature, social, culture, and economy as a commodity of the local community that is subsystem. Only human actions make it seem as if they are able to control nature so that almost all living environments have been touched by human life. Environmental law enforcement can be carried out by imposing sanctions in the form of administrative sanctions.
COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT WITH THE CONCEPT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CRIMINAL LAW Sarah Furqoni; Jelly Leviza
LEX SOCIETAS: Journal of Law and Public Administration Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Academic Solution Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70489/dxn8qq28

Abstract

There are at least four dimensions that can affect the quality of environmental law enforcement, namely the existence of real environmental laws, violators of the law themselves, victims (society), and law enforcement officers, where the four dimensions are mutually influential and take place in a single political, social, economic, and cultural structure in certain circumstances. Environmental problems are complex and interesting problems to study in depth, this is what attracts the author to conduct research on criminal policies that exist in efforts to enforce environmental law in Indonesia. The type of legal research that the author uses in compiling this legal writing is the normative juridical research type. In the context of environmental management based on the Law on Environmental Protection and Management, environmental law enforcement can be carried out in two ways, namely preventively and repressively. Preventive environmental law enforcement is carried out through supervision, while repressive law enforcement is carried out through the application of sanctions. Supervision and the application of sanctions are aimed at achieving community compliance with environmental legal norms
PELINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA KARYA SINEMATOGRAFI ATAS PENGGUNAAN AI GENERATI DI BERBAGAI PLATFORM MEDIA SOSIAL Putri, Rizka Aminni; Saidin, Saidin; Leviza, Jelly
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 8, No 4 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i4.4646

Abstract

Abstrack: The current development of information and communication technology has led humans to use the assistance of Generative AI (artificial intelligence) technology to produce various new works, including cinematographic works circulating on social media. However, the emergence of Generative AI has raised new legal issues, because in its use many works have the potential to violate copyright, especially when this technology is used to modify cinematographic works owned by other parties on social media platforms. This study aims to analyze legal certainty, the form of legal liability for the use of Generative AI, and review the form of legal protection for cinematographic works modified using Generative AI on social media without permission. This research is a normative juridical legal research with a descriptive analytical nature. The data used are secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques and data were carried out through literature studies. Data analysis used normative analysis methods. The results of the study indicate that legal certainty in the use of Generative AI is currently still not achieved because the Copyright Law is still oriented towards humans as creators. The forms of legal liability that can be applied include civil, criminal, and administrative aspects, while legal protection is provided preventively through takedown mechanisms and repressively through compensation lawsuits and criminal sanctions. The conclusion of this study is that the protection of copyright in cinematographic works for the use of Generative AI on social media platforms creates legal uncertainty that needs to be addressed immediately through regulatory updates and strengthening copyright enforcement policies in the digital era. The formation of specific regulations regarding liability for works involving Generative AI technology is an important step towards realizing legal certainty, justice, and benefits for all parties involved.Keyword: Copyright, Cinematographic Works, Generative AI, Social Media, Legal Protection.Abstrak: Perkembangan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi saat ini membuat manusia menggunakan bantuan teknologi AI Generatif (kecerdasan buatan) dalam menghasilkan berbagai karya baru, termasuk karya sinematografi yang beredar di media sosial. Namun, kemunculan AI Generatif telah menimbulkan persoalan hukum baru, karena dalam penggunaannya banyak karya yang berpotensi melanggar hak cipta terutama ketika teknologi ini digunakan untuk memodifikasi karya sinematografi milik pihak lain di platform media sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepastian hukum, bentuk tanjung jawab hukum atas penggunaan AI Generatif serta meninjau bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap karya sinematografi yang dimodifikasi menggunakan AI Generatif di media sosial tanpa izin. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan sifat penelitian dekskriptif analitis. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Teknik dan pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi kepustakaan. Analisis data menggunakan metode analisis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepastian hukum dalam penggunaan AI Generatif saat ini masih belum tercapai karena dalam UUHC masih berorientasi pada manusia sebagai pencipta. Bentuk tanggung jawab hukum yang dapat diterapkan meliputi aspek perdata, pidana serta administratif, sementara perlindungan hukum diberikan secara preventif melalui mekanisme takedown dan represif melalui gugatan ganti rugi maupun sanksi pidana. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah pelindungan hak cipta karya sinematografi atas penggunaan AI Generatif di platform media sosial menimpulkan ketidakpastian hukum yang perlu segera diatasi melalu pembaruan regulasi dan penguatan kebijakan penegakan hak cipta di era digital. Pembentukan aturan khusus mengenai tanggung jawab atas karya yang melibatkan teknologi AI Generatif menjadi langkah penting untuk mewujudkan kepastian, keadilan dan kemanfaatan hukum bagi seluruh pihak terkait.Kata kunci: Hak Cipta, Karya Sinematografi, AI Generatif, Media Sosial, Pelindungan Hukum.
SENGKETA MEREK KANDUI DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT Zuhri, Hanafi; Saidin, Saidin; Leviza, Jelly
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 8, No 4 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i4.4656

Abstract

Abstract: The problem in this study stems from the existence of unfair business competition arising from trademark registration applications in bad faith. The element of good faith has an important role in the trademark legal system in Indonesia to prevent disputes in the future. This study specifically analyzes the trademark dispute in the Medan District Court Decision Number 4 / Pdt.Sus-HKI / Merek / 2019 / PN Niaga Medan, which involves the registration of the KANDUI and KANDUI VILLAS trademarks by the defendant, even though the trademark has been previously used by the plaintiff, even the defendant himself is a manager at the plaintiff's lodging business. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and a case approach. The issues studied include: (1) legal protection of trademarks according to the principle of good faith to prevent unfair business competition; (2) indications of unfair business competition practices in the KANDUI trademark dispute; and (3) the suitability of the judge's considerations in the decision with Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. The results of the study indicate that the judge in the decision only emphasized the first to file principle as regulated in Article 3 of Law Number 20 of 2016, but was inconsistent with his considerations which had acknowledged the relevance of the first to use principle. In addition, the judge did not thoroughly examine the defendant's bad faith as stated in the plaintiff's petitum. Thus, although the judge's decision was formally in accordance with regulations, there were still weaknesses in upholding the principle of good faith which is an important instrument to prevent unfair business competition in the trademark legal regime.Keyword: Business competition, Brand, Bad faith Abstrak: Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini berangkat dari adanya persaingan usaha tidak sehat yang timbul akibat permohonan pendaftaran merek dengan iktikad tidak baik. Unsur iktikad baik memiliki peran penting dalam sistem hukum merek di Indonesia agar tidak menimbulkan sengketa di kemudian hari. Penelitian ini secara khusus menganalisis sengketa merek pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 4/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2019/PN Niaga Medan, yang melibatkan pendaftaran merekKANDUIdanKANDUI VILLASoleh tergugat, padahal merek tersebut telah lebih dahulu digunakan oleh penggugat, bahkan tergugat sendiri merupakan pengurus pada usaha penginapan milik penggugat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Permasalahan yang dikaji meliputi: (1) perlindungan hukum terhadap merek menurut prinsip iktikad baik untuk mencegah persaingan usaha tidak sehat; (2) indikasi praktik persaingan usaha tidak sehat dalam sengketa merekKANDUI; serta (3) kesesuaian pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan tersebut dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hakim dalam putusan tersebut hanya menekankan asasfirst to filesebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016, namun tidak konsisten dengan pertimbangannya yang sempat mengakui relevansi asasfirst to use. Selain itu, hakim tidak secara mendalam mengkaji iktikad tidak baik tergugat sebagaimana petitum penggugat. Dengan demikian, meskipun putusan hakim secara formil sesuai dengan regulasi, namun masih terdapat kelemahan dalam menegakkan prinsip iktikad baik yang menjadi instrumen penting untuk mencegah persaingan usaha tidak sehat dalam rezim hukum merekKata Kunci : Persaingan usaha, Merek, Iktikad tidak baik
Analisis Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Warna yang Diakui sebagai Merek Dagang dalam Hukum Internasional dan Hukum Nasional Indonesia Joy Daniel Tarigan; Jelly Leviza; Fajar Khaify Rizky
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1694

Abstract

Color protection as trademark faces harmonization challenges between international and national legal standards. The TRIPS Agreement recognizes color combinations with requirements of distinctiveness through secondary meaning and non-functionality, where developed countries like the United States and Australia even protect single colors as demonstrated in cases like Louboutin v. YSL. However, Indonesia through Law No. 20 of 2016 only recognizes "color arrangements" interpreted as combinations, hindering single color registration. Main obstacles include absence of technical guidelines for proving secondary meaning, imprecise color representation standards, high examiner discretion, and minimal jurisprudence. This creates legal vacuum and uncertainty for businesses, necessitating regulatory reform to recognize both single and combination color registration to provide legal certainty while aligning with international best practices.
Analisis Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa terhadap Pendaftaran Hak Cipta Lukisan yang Memiliki Kesamaan dengan Merek Terdaftar (Studi Putusan Nomor 40/Pdt.Sus-Hak Cipta/2024/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst) Pradipta Nada Damanik; OK Saidin; Jelly Leviza
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.2252

Abstract

Copyright and trademarks can intersect in a single court case in business practice, particularly when a trademark in the form of a painting registered by one party is subsequently registered as copyright by another. This is reflected in the copyright dispute in Decision Number 40/Pdt.Sus- HakCipta/2024/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. This normative juridical research with descriptive-analytical characteristics uses secondary data obtained through library and document studies. The results show that the Copyright Law and Trademark Law provide different forms of protection according to their respective regimes. Article 65 of the Copyright Law reflects legal certainty by providing firm limitations. The judge's legal considerations in the decision were appropriate, providing justice and legal certainty.
Tinjauan Yuridis Penggandaan Lagu secara Komersial dalam Wadah Media YouTube Tanpa Seizin Pemilik (Studi Putusan Nomor 26/Pdt.Sus-Hak Cipta/2021/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst jo. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 913 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022) Siti Kayla Haliza; Jelly Leviza; Aflah
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.2435

Abstract

Song commercialization on YouTube often violates copyright as unauthorized reproduction disregards creators' moral and economic rights. This normative descriptive research examines legal protection, perpetrator liability, and legal considerations in Decision 913K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022. Legal protection is implemented preventively through copyright registration and repressively through compensation claims and criminal charges. Unauthorized reproduction perpetrators face criminal sanctions up to 10 years imprisonment or Rp4 billion fine. The court's decision is deemed disproportionate in depicting creators' losses and inadequately reflects principles of justice and legal certainty.
Pelindungan Hukum terhadap Pencipta Lagu dalam Perolehan Hak Royalti atas Hak Cipta pada Platform Digital (Analisis terhadap Pencipta Lagu Reina dengan Judul Lagu Stuck in 17) Susilo, Reynaldi; Saidin, Saidin; Leviza, Jelly
Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 6 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin (Februari - Maret 2026)
Publisher : Green Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jim.v4i6.1741

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pelindungan hukum terhadap pencipta lagu dalam perolehan hak royalti pada platform digital berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia, mengkaji implikasi hukum perbedaan pengaturan royalti antara Undang-Undang Hak Cipta dan kebijakan platform digital, serta menelaah implementasi pelindungan hukum tersebut melalui studi kasus pencipta lagu Reina dengan judul Stuck in 17. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptif-analitis dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif pelindungan hak royalti pencipta lagu telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56 Tahun 2021, namun dalam praktik masih ditemukan permasalahan berupa kurangnya transparansi perhitungan royalti, perbedaan kebijakan platform digital dengan regulasi nasional, serta minimnya pemahaman pencipta lagu terhadap mekanisme hak cipta. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pelindungan hukum terhadap pencipta lagu di era digital belum sepenuhnya memberikan kepastian hukum dan keadilan.
Revocation of Deed of Gift Issued by Land a PPAT Due Heirs Disapproval (A Study on the Verdict of Medan High Religious Court No.112/PDT.G/2019/PTA.MDN) Farahdiba Syawlia Siregar; Hasim Purba; Jelly Leviza
Journal Equity of Law and Governance Vol. 6 No. 2
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/elg.6.2.11663.144-164

Abstract

A gift is something which is given for free: it is intended to be the solution in the distributing inheritance so that there will be no conflict in practicing it. In reality, however, a gift is not the best solution because there are many disputes about the revocation of deed of gifts as what happens in the Verdict of the Medan PTA (High Religious Court) No.112/Pdt.G/2019/PTA.Mdn because a gift is a joint property and given by the parents to one of their children without any approval from the others heirs. The result is that it causes a conflict among the heirs since they think that it is not fair. This research uses juridical normative research method with descriptive analytical approach. The data consists of secondary data, obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. They are gathered by conducting library research and interviews. The gathered data are analyzed by using qualitative analytical method. The result of the research suggests that the revocation of the deed of gift happens because there is a regulation which has been violated-the gift is more than 1/3 of the property. In making the deed of gift, a PPAT is a responsible for it. He is required to understand the regulation the regulations on distrtribution of gift, let alone if the heirs and the testators are moslems. He has to know how to distribute a gift in the KHI (Complication of the Islamic Laws), and he has to apply the Principle of Prudence in making Deeds of Gift in order to avoid conflicts. The conclusion is that the Deed of Gift No.184/Binjai Kota/2004 issued by PPAT in the Verdict of the Medan PTA (High Religious Court) No.112/Pdt.G/2019/PTA.Mdn does not have any legal force because the deed of gift has violated the Islamic Sharia specified in Article 210 of KHI in which is more than 1/3 of the testator’s property and the distribution of inheritance does not have any approval from the heirs. The consequence is that the receiver loses his right on the gift. The panel of the judges’ decision causes the status of the land and the building becomes the joint property again. The panel of judges’ decision in this Verdict has applied the Principle of Prudence for the whole party since the judges’ do not side with any parties in the litigation, and they recognize the equality of rights and obligations of both parties.
PENYULUHAN ANTI-DISKRIMINASI UNTUK MASA DEPAN YANG LEBIH BAIK BAGI SISWA-SISWI SMA YAYASAN PERGURUAN MARKUS MEDAN Fajar Khaify Rizky; Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto; Jelly Leviza; Mahmud Mulyadi; Tommy Aditia Sinulingga; D. Shahreiza; Dody Safnul
Community Development Journal : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Volume 6 No. 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/cdj.v6i1.42797

Abstract

Diskriminasi terhadap siswa dari kelompok minoritas sosial, seperti yang terjadi di SMA Swasta Markus Medan, merupakan tantangan serius dalam menciptakan lingkungan pendidikan inklusif dan adil. Ketimpangan perlakuan berdasarkan latar belakang sosial, budaya, atau kemampuan siswa menghambat perkembangan akademis, psikologis, dan hubungan sosial yang sehat. Pendidikan inklusif yang menghargai keberagaman dan memberikan dukungan yang adil sangat diperlukan untuk memastikan setiap siswa berkembang dalam lingkungan aman, nyaman, dan mendukung. Kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat menggunakan metode observasi, presentasi PowerPoint, video edukasi, serta sesi diskusi untuk meningkatkan kesadaran siswa terhadap anti-diskriminasi. Sekolah memiliki tanggung jawab menciptakan lingkungan inklusif di mana keberagaman dihargai dan setiap siswa diperlakukan secara setara. Dengan melibatkan siswa, orang tua, dan masyarakat, pendidikan dapat berperan dalam membangun budaya toleransi dan keadilan sosial. Saran untuk mengatasi isu diskriminasi mencakup penguatan kebijakan inklusif, integrasi pendidikan anti-diskriminasi dalam kurikulum, serta pelatihan rutin bagi guru dan staf sekolah. Dengan langkah-langkah ini, diharapkan diskriminasi dapat ditekan, sehingga semua siswa berkembang secara setara tanpa memandang latar belakang sosial atau budaya mereka.
Co-Authors Abdul Azis, Fouza Azwir Abdul Rahman Abdurrahman Harit’s Ketaren Ade Yuliany Siahaan Adwani Adwani Affila Aflah Afnila Agung Firmansyah Agung Julian Agus Sardjono Agusmidah Agusmidah Agusta Kanin Ahmad, Akiruddin Aidil Hamdi Akbar Hamdani Rambe Akbar Nasution, Faisal Alfian Syahri Ali Mulyo Utomo Ali Sentosa Alma Panjaitan Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Amirah Ainun Sofiah Hasibuan Ammanawwara, Ammanawwara Ananda Jakaria Anaria Br Ginting Andalan Zalukhu Anderson Sirongoringo Sirongoringo Andy Andy Anggara Suryanagara Anggreni Atmei Lubis Annisa Nabila, Annisa Annisa Siregar Ansharullah Ida Arif Arif Arif Arif Aronifati Zebua Atika Putri Amira Aulia Nusa Bela Aulida, Dinda Ayu Adinda Pratiwi Ayu Lestari Tanjung Ayu Nika Azam, Saiful Azwar, Tengku Keizerina Devi Azwarman Azwarman Bachtiar Simatupang Barry Sugiarto Barus, Adhi Pradana Barus, Utara Maharany Bastari Mathon Batubara, Ichsan Aulia Beby Suryani Fithri Brian Christian Telaumbanua Budiarto Sembiring BUDIMAN GINTING Budiman Ginting Budiman Ginting Ginting Carl Augustinus Hothinca Soutihon Tampub Chairul Bariah Chairul Bariah Chairul Bariah Chatrine Lidya Girsang Christina N M Tobing Chrisyela Sinaga Cindy Vania Lumban Batu Clara Apulina Ginting Cut Maidina Ananda Putri D. Shahreiza David Leon A. Sembiring Deayu Deayu Dedi Harianto Dedi Kurnia Suranta Ginting Denggan Muhammad Ilmi Deni Purba Devi Azwar, T.Keizerina Dewi Ervina Suryani Dina S.T Manurung Djalil, Felix Novian Dody Safnul Dr.M.Ekaputra, S.H,M.Hum Edi Yunara Ediwarman Ediwarman Edo Maranata Tambunan Edy Ikhsan Eka Husnul Hidayati Ekaputra, Mohammad Ekpi Yoksara Simbolon Elphan Kumbara Elpina Elpina Elsa Savira Eman Suparman Esthalita Octavia Tobing Evi Ratna Evalinda Fadhillah Fahmi Adriany Fahri Ramadhan Faisal Akbar Nasution Faisal Akbar Nasution Faiz Ahmed Illovi Faradila Harahap Farahdiba Syawlia Siregar Feby Yanti Harahap Fitri Nadiyah Razma Fitria Ramadhani Siregar Friska Messelina Sirait Geby Aviqa Gomgoman Simbolon Gultom, Steffy Suzani Meilina Gunarto Gunarto Hafizhah, Annisa Hanawi Aananda Putra Sitohang Harahap, Mhd Dicky Safii Harris, Abd Harris, Abd. Harry Fauzi Hasim Purba Hasim Purba HASIM PURBA Hasim Purba Hasyim Purba Hengki Hengki Henrico Valentino Nainggolan Herlinda, Erna Hidayat, Hayekal Hotman Bintang Parulian Aruan Indra Kurniawan Nasution Isnaini Ivan Jovi Hutauruk Jaya, Herry Shan Jean Bernard Myson Joenari Anthony Marpaung Joy Ananda Putra Sianipar Joy Daniel Tarigan Junandar Indra Tongam Panggabean Kania Syafiza Keizerina Devi Azwar Keizerina Devi Azwar Khadijah Hasibuan Khalida Syahputri Lani Sujiagnes Panjaitan Laurentia A. Kartika Leomongga Alamsyah Sitompul M Ekaputra M. Aulia Zikry Lubis M. Freddie Mullie Sembiring Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Albisar Mahmud Mulyadi MAHMUL SIREGAR Mahmul Siregar Maria Kaban Maria Margaretta Sitompul Marlina Marlina Marlina, Marlina Marsella Marsella Marsella, Marsella Marupa Hasudungan Sianturi Melda Theresia Sihombing Mhd. Nur Arrahman Nasution Micael Jeriko Damanik Miranti, Indah MIRZA - NASUTION Mirza Nasution Mirza Nasution Mirza Nasution Muhammad Din Al Fajar Muhammad Ekaputra Muhammad Hamdan Muhammad Hamdan Muhammad Umar Mulhadi, Mulhadi Mulyadi, Lestari Mahmud Nasution, Siti Nurahmi Nindya Irma NINGRUM NATASYA SIRAIT Nita Nurvita Novalia Arnita Simamora Novie Andriani Kesuma Nuraisyah Nuraisyah Nurul Kamila O.K Saidin O.K. Saidin OK Saidin Ok Saidin OK. Saidin OK. Saidin Okky Wiratama Pendastaren Tarigan Tarigan Phio Tuah Reysario Sinaga Pradipta Nada Damanik Prof.Dr.Syafrudin Kalo,SH,M.Hum Purba, Ardiansyah Purba Purba, Hasim Purba Puspita, Yolanda Bella Putra, Wahyudi Prima Putri Ayu Pratiwi Putri, Rizka Aminni Rabiatul Adawiyah Rafika, Cut Rahmi Handayani Raisa Rafina Rajagukguk, Eko Yudis Parlin Rambe, Akbar Hamdani Rambe, Suria Ningsih Reyhan Agung Munthe Riadhi Alhayyan Riadhi Alhayyan Riadhi Alhayyan Riadhi Alhayyan Ritonga, Joni Sandri RIZKI RAHAYU FITRI Rizky Akbar Prabowo Rizky, Fajar Khaify Ronni Bonic Rosnidar Sembiring Rudi Hartanto Runtung Ruth Gladys Sembiring Safnul, Doddy Safnul, Dody Saidin Saidin Saidin Saidin Saidin Saidin Saidin Saidin Saidin, OK Saidin, OK. saidin, saidin Saiful Azam Saputra, Reza Eko Sarah Furqoni Satria Perdana Sihotang, Nurleli Silitonga, Glotty Christina Simada, Arthur Sinulingga, Tommy Aditia Sirait, Leonny Rachel Aprillia Siregar, Namira Romaito Siregar, Taufik Sitepu, Kartika Dewanty Sitepu, Runtung Siti Kayla Haliza Siti Nurahmi Nasution Siti Sarra Sonang Akbario Sriayu Aritha Panggabean Steffy Steffy Suadela Liu Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Sukarja, Detania Sukses M. P. Siburian, Sukses M. P. Sumanggam Wahyu Sunarmi Sunarmi, Sunarmi Suprayitno Suprayitno Surung Aritonang Aritonang Susilo, Reynaldi Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto - Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Syafrizal Syafrizal Syafruddin Kalo Syamsul Arifin Syaravina Lubis Syarifah Lisa Andriati T KEIZERINA DEVI T Keizerina Devi T Keizerina Devi A T. Keizeirina Devi Azwar T. Keizerina Devi T. Keizerina Devi T. Keizerina Devi A T. Keizerina Devi Azwar T. Keizerina Devi Azwar T. Keizerina Devi Azwar - Tan Kamello Tan Kamello Tanjung, Khairunissa Isyarah Telaumbanua, Brian Christian Tengku Keizerina Devi Tengku Keizerina Devi Theddy Theddy Themis Simaremare Tommy Aditia Sinulingga Tony Tony Tri Afandy Trohna, Dyona Rizky Tumanggor, Deynisa Bella Utari Maharany Barus Utary Maharany Barus Ventyrina, Ine Warhan Wirasto Widya Agnes Hamid Windy Widya Utami Yahya Ziqra Yamin Lubis Yefrizawati Yemima Amelia Siagian Yolanda Sari KS Yudi Syahrudin Yuthi Sinari Zainal Abidin Pakpahan Zuhri, Hanafi Zulhelmi, Zulhelmi `Saidin, OK.