Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
15.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Panorama Hukum NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Pepatudzu : Media Pendidikan dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal el-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Jurnal hukum IUS PUBLICUM Collegium Studiosum Journal Jurnal Communitarian Journal Evidence Of Law POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Begawan Abioso JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Research Horizon Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal JUSTITIABLE - Jurnal Hukum Universitas Bojonegoro ANDREW Law Journal Journal Customary Law Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Journal of Innovative and Creativity Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Jurnal Batavia Journal Social Sciences and Humanioran Review Retorika: Jurnal Komunikasi, Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Rechtsvinding International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica J-CEKI Siber International Journal of Advanced Law LANCAH Jurnal Inovasi dan Tren Journal of Political and Governance Studies
Triadi, Irwan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 133 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 133 Documents
Search

 10   11   12   13   14 
A Juridico-Philosophical Examination of the Death Penalty within the Framework of Legal Philosophy A, Annisa; Triadi, Irwan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17614716

Abstract

The death penalty remains one of the most controversial forms of criminal punishment within Indonesia’s legal system, provoking longstanding debates from both juridical and philosophical perspectives. On one hand, the state continues to uphold capital punishment as an instrument to maintain public order and provide a deterrent effect against perpetrators of extraordinary crimes. On the other hand, there are views that regard the death penalty as contradictory to humanitarian values and the fundamental human right to life. This study aims to analyze the regulation of the death penalty in Indonesia’s positive law and to examine its existence from the perspective of legal philosophy, particularly through the lenses of utilitarianism, retributivism, and humanism. This research employs a normative juridical method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The data were obtained through an analysis of relevant statutory provisions, such as the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, and judicial decisions related to the implementation of capital punishment in Indonesia. The results indicate that the regulation of the death penalty in Indonesia has undergone a paradigm shift toward a more humanistic approach, as reflected in the 2023 Criminal Code, which provides a ten-year probationary period for death row inmates. From a philosophical standpoint, capital punishment can be justified within utilitarian and retributive frameworks as long as it serves to protect society and uphold justice. However, the humanist view rejects its existence, emphasizing that the right to life is non-derogable and cannot be taken away by the state. Therefore, the existence of the death penalty in Indonesia reflects an ongoing effort to balance justice, utility, and humanity. 
The Normative Relationship Between Moral Values and Justice in Modern Legal Philosophy and Its Consequences for Indonesian Legal Practice Julio, Christopher Elia; Putra, Gilang; Istimeisyah, Dian; Maniari, Elsa; Triadi, Irwan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17621563

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between moral values and justice from the perspective of modern legal philosophy and examines their implementation in Indonesia’s legal practice. The research is grounded in the classical debate between natural law, which positions morality as the source of legal legitimacy, and legal positivism, which separates law from moral considerations. The study aims to analyze how moral values and justice can interact to shape a fair and dignified legal system in Indonesia. Using a normative qualitative approach, the study reviews philosophical theories and national legal practices, including Constitutional Court decisions and the application of restorative justice. The findings reveal that the implementation of moral values and justice in Indonesia’s legal system remains imperfect due to the gap between positive law and substantive justice. Nevertheless, integration efforts continue through progressive legal approaches and human rights, based reforms that emphasize humanity and social justice. In conclusion, moral values and justice are interdependent within modern law, morality provides the ethical foundation for legitimacy, while justice represents its tangible realization in social life.
The Concept of Justice According to Pancasila and Its Relevance to Law Enforcement Tambunan, Joy Catherine Carina; Triadi, Irwan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17610323

Abstract

Justice is a fundamental goal in the Indonesian legal system, with Pancasila as the philosophical foundation and source of all sources of law (staatsfundamentalnorm). However, there is a significant gap between the ideal of Pancasila justice and the reality of law enforcement, which is considered discriminatory and not fully in favor of human values. This study aims to philosophically examine the concept of justice according to Pancasila and analyze the relevance and challenges of its application in law enforcement practices in Indonesia. Using normative legal research methods with philosophical, legislative, and conceptual approaches, this study finds that justice in Pancasila is holistic, integrative, and substantive, which is inspired by its five principles in an integrated manner: moral-spiritual values (Principle 1), respect for human dignity (Principle 2), strengthening unity (Principle 3), achievement through deliberation (Principle 4), and equitable distribution of welfare (Principle 5). Despite its high normative relevance, its implementation is hampered by various factors, such as the dominance of a rigid legal positivism paradigm, political intervention, corruption, and unequal access to justice. Therefore, a reconstruction of the law enforcement paradigm and systemic reforms focused on internalizing Pancasila values are needed to realize the desired substantive justice.
Vigilantisme dan Antinomi Keadilan: Tinjauan Filosofis Plato dan Aristoteles Paramesti, Nirwasita Zada; Triadi, Irwan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17646775

Abstract

This study aims to analyze two main issues: the antinomy of justice between substantive justice, rooted in Plato’s moral idealism, and procedural justice, rooted in Aristotle’s rationality, as well as how vigilantism emerges as a consequence of this tension. The research employs a normative legal method with philosophical, conceptual, and case study approaches. Data are analyzed qualitatively and deductively through comprehensive library research to draw interpretative conclusions. The findings reveal that the antinomy of justice stems from the fundamental differences between Plato’s moral idealism, which focuses on substance and conscience, and Aristotle’s rational realism, which emphasizes procedure or the order of positive law. It is found that vigilantism is not merely a criminal act but rather a philosophical challenge posed by society against the state. This phenomenon erupts when the public experiences a crisis of trust and perceives the system of positive law as rigid, slow, and morally bankrupt formalism. The anger of the masses represents an effort to reclaim substantive justice by consciously disregarding procedures deemed to have failed.
Filsafat Hukum sebagai Dasar Pembentukan Norma dan Prinsip Hukum Nabilla, Anissa; Triadi, Irwan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17639976

Abstract

Legal philosophy plays a fundamental role in shaping the direction and character of a national legal system. Law is not merely understood as a collection of coercive positive norms, but as a moral and rational reflection oriented toward substantive justice. This research aims to analyze how legal philosophy provides a conceptual foundation and value-based framework in the formation of legal norms and principles in Indonesia. The research method employed is normative legal research with a conceptual and philosophical approach, supported by literature studies of both classical and contemporary legal thinkers. The findings indicate that legal philosophy serves a crucial function in ensuring that every legislative product reflects ethical, moral, and humanitarian values as the essence of law itself. Philosophical values, particularly those derived from Pancasila, form the core basis for creating a legal system that is just, humanistic, and oriented toward social welfare. Therefore, the application of legal philosophy in the process of law-making not only strengthens the moral legitimacy of the national legal system but also ensures a balance between legal certainty, justice, and expediency in the practice of state and social life.
A Comparison of the Concept of Justice in Natural Law and Positive Law: Its Relevance to Law Enforcement Practices in Indonesia Hia, Imelda Indah Putri; Triadi, Irwan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17645254

Abstract

This research is motivated by the tension between formal legal certainty and demands for substantive justice in law enforcement practices in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze and compare the concepts of justice from the perspectives of natural law and positive law, and to assess their relevance in the national legal system. The research method used is normative juridical with a descriptive-analytical approach through a literature review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results show that natural law emphasizes justice based on universal moral principles (substantial justice), while positive law focuses on compliance with formal procedures and norms (procedural justice). The Indonesian legal system, based on Pancasila, conceptually seeks to synthesize these two perspectives, as reflected in the obligation of judges to explore the values of social justice. However, the dominance of legal positivism still creates a gap between legal certainty and a sense of social justice. The implications of this research emphasize the need for a balance between legal certainty and moral justice to make Indonesian law more meaningful and substantively just.
A Comparison of the Implementation of Presidential Impeachment in Presidential Systems (A Comparative Study of Indonesia and South Korea) Syalsabila, Khairunisa; Triadi, Irwan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17803253

Abstract

The Constitution (UUD) is the supreme law that serves as the basis for the administration of the state and must be obeyed by all elements of the nation, including the President and Vice President. In a presidential system of government, the President's extensive executive power demands a strict oversight mechanism, one of which is through impeachment. This study aims to analyze and compare the legal regulations and implementation mechanisms for the impeachment of heads of state in Indonesia and South Korea. The study uses a literature study method with a qualitative approach through analysis of various legal sources, journals, and relevant literature. The results show that Indonesia regulates impeachment in detail in Articles 7A and 7B of the 1945 Constitution with the involvement of the House of Representatives (DPR), the Constitutional Court, and the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR), and the reasons for impeachment are specifically outlined. Meanwhile, South Korea regulates impeachment in its Constitution more generally by involving the National Assembly and the Constitutional Court, and is not limited to the President, but also other high-ranking state officials. In practice, South Korea has successfully implemented the impeachment process constitutionally, while Indonesia has never implemented this mechanism in accordance with the procedures following the amendment to the 1945 Constitution. In conclusion, although both countries adopt a presidential system of government, there are significant differences in the legal structure, grounds for impeachment, and implementation of the impeachment mechanism.
Relevansi Hukum Alam Rasional dalam Interpretasi Pancasila Sebagai Sumber Dari Segala Sumber Hukum A, Annisa; Wahdah, Azzhara Nikita; Tambunan, Joy Catherine Carina; Rubianti, Vaganti Safa Sukma; Triadi, Irwan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17853185

Abstract

Pancasila, as the source of all sources of law, has a central position in Indonesia's national legal system. However, the main challenge faced is how to translate the abstract values of Pancasila into concrete and operational positive legal norms. This article examines the relevance of the concept of rational natural law as a philosophical approach in interpreting Pancasila contextually in the formation of legislation. Rational natural law emphasizes the importance of reason and universal moral values as the basis for the formation of law, so that the law is not only formally valid, but also substantially fair. In the Indonesian context, Pancasila values such as social justice, fair and civilized humanity, and deliberation are consistent with the principles of rational natural law. Through this approach, Pancasila values can be transformed into legal principles that are relevant to the needs of modern society, such as the principles of proportionality, balance of interests, and protection of natural rights. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach and qualitative analysis of regulations and court decisions that reflect the application of rational natural law principles. The results of the study show that the interpretation of rational natural law in relation to Pancasila acts as a bridge between philosophical values and positive legal norms, as well as a filter against global influences so that national law continues to reflect the nation's identity.
Positivism and Its Implications for Legal Science and Law Enforcement Rilya, Muhammad Avin Athalla; Triadi, Irwan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17800493

Abstract

This study aims to critically analyze the concept of positivism—both as a paradigm in the philosophy of science and as a school of thought in legal theory (legal positivism)—and examine its profound implications for the development of science (particularly the social sciences) and law enforcement practices. Positivism, which emphasizes empirical data, observation, verification, and a clear separation between fact (is) and value (ought), has shaped modern scientific methodology. However, when applied to law, legal positivism (as advocated by Austin and Kelsen) limits legal validity to formal procedures and competent authorities, ignoring moral considerations or substantial justice. Using normative-empirical research methods and a comprehensive literature review, it is found that the dominance of positivism in science fosters methodological objectivity, but in law enforcement, it can produce procedural legitimacy that is vulnerable to justice criticism. The main implication is the emergence of tension between the legal certainty promised by positivism and the pressing demands of substantive justice.
Morality as the Foundation of Legal Formation in Indonesia from the Perspective of Modern Legal Philosophy Putra, Gilang; Triadi, Irwan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17716788

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between public morality and the law-making process in Indonesia, focusing on the extent to which moral values are reflected in contemporary legislative practices. Theoretically, an ideal legal system should embody moral principles and prioritize justice and the public good. However, political realities often influence the legislative process, resulting in regulations that do not fully represent societal interests. Several laws enacted in the past two decades—such as the revision of the Anti-Corruption Law (UU KPK), the Mineral and Coal Law (UU Minerba), and the Omnibus Law on Job Creation (UU Cipta Kerja)—illustrate the dominance of political interests and the limited involvement of the public. The findings indicate that legislative practices frequently deviate from the principles of good regulatory formation as mandated by Law No. 12 of 2011 and its amendments, particularly concerning transparency, clarity of purpose, and public participation. Consequently, public trust in the House of Representatives remains low, as reflected in the 2025 survey by Indikator Politik Indonesia. This study underscores the importance of oversight mechanisms such as judicial review and highlights the need for more substantive public participation to ensure that legislation aligns with moral values and promotes social justice.
Co-Authors A, Annisa Adam Ramadhan Adam, Chelsea Kairadinda Adhitya, Muhammad Rendy Adilla Putri, Sefrina Linda Afdhali, Dino Rizka Agus Ridwan Aini, Hanifah Qurrotu al anshari, Muhammad Faqih Alfatoni, Muhammad Sidiq Ali, Jovansyah ali, yusuf Alwan Davis Apriansyah, Mohammad Amanda, Nur Septiana Andreas Ramadhani, Renald Anshari, Muhammad Faqih Al Arafah, Rasya Ardian, Muhammad Fadhil Arfah, Azizah Aria, Muhammad Gustaf Ariapramuda, Cassis Aritonang, Christian Daniel Athallah, Rafli Akmal Audra, Rasyanda Aulia Adek Putri, Nabila Az Zanubiya, Siti Syafa Azra, Muhammad Arya Azzahra, Novita Fitria Bayu Setiawan Butar Butar, Frans Samuel Junero C, Chatrine Cahyono, Marsha Putri Damareka, Muhammad Darrell Danardono Darmawan, Abqary Faraz Darsono Darsono Darsono, Leandra Aurelrio Putra Dewi Rosalina, Maria Dewo Dharmawan, Nugroho Dhaniswara, Puandita Douglas, Jaury Elvira, Olga Fadhila, Rasya Aika Faidzuddin, Achmad Fattah, Akhmad Kautsar Febrian Rizky Akbar Febrian, Fazl Mawla Fiandie, Ursula Jacqueline Firda Amalia Fitriani, Maulida Furqon, Abdil Azizul Gubawan, Endy Guntoro, Weko Satya Hadi, Ilman Hafizar, Achmad Hafizhah, Nur Raima Haikal, Raka Hamdi, Muhammad Naufal Razzan Hantoro, Charissa Aulia Harahap, Aura Nasya Madhani Hariati, Retno Hasanah Pane, Khofifah Hia, Imelda Indah Putri Hudaya, Chintya Rachma Huurun Salma, Athifa Ikwanto, Mahia Albar Ilyas, Levi Christopher Indah, Reviana Mutiara Irawan Irawan IRVANDI, IRVANDI Irwanda, Tasya Gita Istimeisyah, Dian Joe, Cleo Patricia Joseph, Michael Geovani Joseph, Michael Giovanni Julio, Christopher Elia Julius, Tambok Justicyo, Rifky Kaban, Divany Harbina Emzilena Karimah, Nabila Kasih, Osihanna Meita Kayla Sidabutar, Jesamine Margareth Khairunnisa, Nasywa Khoiril Anam, Ahmad Kumor, Muhammad Setyo Damar Kumoro, Muhammad Damar Setyo Ledewedjo, Jessica Leonita Anabel Lewerissa, Samuel Suiq Lidowati, Alvina Maretia Limbong, Albert S. Liztha Maharani, Nabilah Lodewijk Peter, Daniel Lubis, Rachel Lubis, William Haposan Lufthi, Al Daffa Naufal Maaruf, Nefrisa Maharani, Aulia Cantika MALA HAYATI, MALA Manggala, Bayu Suryadi Maniari, Elsa Maretia Lidowati, Alvina Maryanto - Mawene, Marcha Jeanne Melati, Sekar Nabilla, Anissa Nafis, Abdul Haris Naibaho, Aldhy Wicaksana Nasir, Tomi Khoyron Nathaniella, Angelica Naufal Nabil, Tamam Naufaldho, Faiz Nur Pratama, Daya Oktaviani, Eka Putri Paksi, Arif Pujawangsa Pangaribuan, Kevin Angelo Panjaitan, Rachel Netanya Paradita, Silvi Aryana Paramesti, Nirwasita Zada Pardomuan, Jaury Douglas Parluhutan Sagala Parulian, Hendra Pradana, David Pratama, Daya Nur Pratistita, Made Wipra Priambodo, Rio Prihantono, Pradipta Priyantoro, Lucky Pujo Widodo, Pujo Purba, Diana Febri Nauli Purnama, Ismarini Della Puspitasari, Isti Putra Syawal Al Mahdi, Muhammad Putra, Gilang Putri, Keshia Annisa Rachmat Setiawibawa Rahardi, Andriyan Rahayu, Cantika Tresna Rahmadhany, Vania Zachra Rahman, Hafizh Aulia Rahman, Naila Kamila Raihani, Siti Rifqa Ramadhan, Nawal Athaillah Ramelan, Michael Sanrio Rangoraja, Amudi Panigori Rasya, Harlin Sabrinda Reyhan, Maulana Arfidata Rifky Trihandoko, Ronaldindo Rilya, Muhammad Avin Athalla Rizka Afdhali, Dino Rizkisyah, Renofadli Rizky Akbar, Febrian Rizky, Gerry Putra Roring, Edward Benedictus Rosmaida, Erviyanti Rubianti, Vaganti Safa Sukma Ruli Agustin, Ruli Safira, Ishma Salsabila, Marsha Isnaini Satino Satino Setyawibawa, Rachmat Sianturi, Catherine Rosalina Siregar, Adhito Martogi Natanael Situmorang, Christian Immanuel Situmorang, May Laura Thecci Sofyan Sauri, Sofyan Sukendro, Achmed Sukrisno, Adi Sulaeman, Akhfa Kamilla Sumertha KY, I Gede Supadmo, Darto Suwarno, Panji Suwarsoyo, Namira Azzahra Syahputra, Rifky Justicyo Syahuri, Taufiqqrohman Syahuri Syaid, Ishma Safira Syalsabila, Khairunisa Syauqina, Naumy Syihab, M. Alvin Taher, Salsabila Tambunan, Joy Catherine Carina Tampubolon , Imagrace Triamorita Tampubolon, Imagrace Triamorita Tampubolon, Vernandito Sudharta Raftua Tarmizi, Rasyid Taufiqurrohman Syahuri Uksan, Arifuddin Utama, Anang Puji Wadi, Raines Wahdah, Azzhara Nikita Wicaksono Adi, Satrio Yanuarsyah, Dimas Yarly, Erfina Zahra Ajrina, Denanda Zahra, Devyta Ardiyaning Azz Zahratu, Nazwa Salsabila Zaki, Akmal Zevanya, Cristella Zybila, Agista