Articles
<![CDATA[TRANSFORMASI PRANATA PATRONASE MASYARAKAT NELAYAN: DARI EKONOMI MORALITAS MENUJU EKONOMI PASAR ]]>
<![CDATA[-, Mirajiani]]>;
<![CDATA[S.Wahyuni, Ekawati]]>;
<![CDATA[Satria, Arif]]>;
<![CDATA[-, Saharuddin]]>;
<![CDATA[Kusumastanto, Tridoyo]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Komunitas: Research and Learning in Sociology and Anthropology Vol 6, No 1 (2014): Lokalitas, Relasi Kuasa dan Transformasi Sosial ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v6i1.2950
<![CDATA[Masyarakat nelayan  mengalami transformasi sosial ekonomi akibat penetrasi pembangunan dan pasar. Transformasi sosial ekonomi yang terjadi membawa perubahan signifikan pranata ekonomi nelayan, karena nelayan harus mengkonstruksikan  pranata ekonomi baru yang dianggap dapat mempertahankan penghidupan nelayan pada kondisi survival dan sesuai dengan perubahan yang terjadi. Penelitian ini mendalami bagaimana  transformasi pranata patronase  yang terjadi dan keterkaitannya dengan keterjaminan ekonomi pada masyarakat nelayan di Pesisir  Ujung Kulon.  Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan tipe penelitian studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan masyarakat nelayan di Pesisir Ujung Kulon mengalami transformasi pranata ekonomi dari patronase  berbasis moralitas menjadi berbasis norma ekonomi pasar. Di era ekonomi pasar, patronase  merupakan suatu alternatif pranata ekonomi nelayan yang dibangun  untuk tetap bertahan dengan situasi krisis dan ketidakpastian ekonomi serta mata pencaharian yang bersifat fluktuatif.  Ditinjau  dari keterjaminan ekonomi, pranata patronase moralitas di masa lalu lebih memberikan jaminan  ekonomi nelayan pada situasi krisis daripada pranata patronase berbasis norma ekonomi pasar.  Pada situasi di mana pranata patronase tidak bisa sepenuhnya berfungsi sebagai pranata jaminan ekonomi nelayan,  maka untuk tetap bertahan  pada situasi ekonomi yang kurang terjamin  nelayan mengandalkan relasi ekonomi alternatif yang disediakan pasar  di luar patronase. Fishing communities experiencing socio-economic transformation as a result of development and market penetration. Socio-economic transformation is followed by significant change in economic institutions, as fishermen have to construct a new economic institutions which are supposed to maintain the livelihood in survival conditions and in accordance with the changes. This research was to explore how economic institution transformation happens and its effect on  economic security in coastal fishing communities in Ujung Kulon. The method uses a qualitative approach and the type of research uses a case study research. Results of the research showed coastal fishing communities in Ujung Kulon transformed economic institutions of patronage based morality becomes the norm based market economy. In the era of market economy, patronage remains an alternative economic institutions built to survive the crisis and uncertainty and livelihood fluctuated. The fact is related to economic security, institutional patronage morality in the past to provide security over the fishing economy in crisis situations rather than norm -based patronage institutions of the market economy. In situations where the institution of patronage can not fully function as economic security institutions of fishermen, then to survive on less secure economic situation of fishermen rely on alternative economic relations are provided markets outside patronage]]>
<![CDATA[The Existence of Gampong in the Middle of Changing Community ]]>
<![CDATA[Mahmuddin, Mahmuddin]]>;
<![CDATA[Kolopaking, Laura M]]>;
<![CDATA[Kinseng, Rilus A]]>;
<![CDATA[Wasistiono, Sadu]]>;
<![CDATA[Saharuddin, Saharuddin]]>
<![CDATA[ KOMUNITAS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN SOCIETY AND CULTURE Vol 8, No 1 (2016): Komunitas, March 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v8i1.4967
<![CDATA[The passage of Act No. 18, 2001 on regional autonomy and followed up with the issuance of Qanun No. 4, 2003 on mukim, and Qanun No. 5, 2003 on gampong and reinforced by UUPA No. 11, 2006 on Acehnese government is a history of social identity of Acehnese society, which has been neglected during the conflict. The regional government has made some breakthroughs and one of the breakthroughs was gampong revitalization through a program called âback to gampongâ. The study aims to answer the dynamic of revitalization of gampong institution in the middle of special autonomy implementation and the implementation of Qanun gampong in the administration of gampong institution. The study shows that the implementation of program âback to gampongâ encourages the strengthening process of gampong institution as well as weakens the institution itself. The development of gampong that focuses on physical aspect has created coordination gap among officials of gampong institution in planning system and financial management. Â The tug in the mechanism of financial development and management at gampong has created a space for the involvement and influence from gampong elite in gampong governance. Non-uniform honorary allocation for gampong governmental apparatus is one of indicators of weak role and function of gampong cultural institution because the previous inherent communal values have been calculated economically.]]>
<![CDATA[The Existence of Gampong in the Middle of Changing Community ]]>
<![CDATA[Mahmuddin, Mahmuddin]]>;
<![CDATA[Kolopaking, Laura M]]>;
<![CDATA[Kinseng, Rilus A]]>;
<![CDATA[Wasistiono, Sadu]]>;
<![CDATA[Saharuddin, Saharuddin]]>
<![CDATA[ KOMUNITAS: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture Vol 8, No 1 (2016): Komunitas, March 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v8i1.4967
<![CDATA[The passage of Act No. 18, 2001 on regional autonomy and followed up with the issuance of Qanun No. 4, 2003 on mukim, and Qanun No. 5, 2003 on gampong and reinforced by UUPA No. 11, 2006 on Acehnese government is a history of social identity of Acehnese society, which has been neglected during the conflict. The regional government has made some breakthroughs and one of the breakthroughs was gampong revitalization through a program called “back to gampongâ€. The study aims to answer the dynamic of revitalization of gampong institution in the middle of special autonomy implementation and the implementation of Qanun gampong in the administration of gampong institution. The study shows that the implementation of program “back to gampong†encourages the strengthening process of gampong institution as well as weakens the institution itself. The development of gampong that focuses on physical aspect has created coordination gap among officials of gampong institution in planning system and financial management.  The tug in the mechanism of financial development and management at gampong has created a space for the involvement and influence from gampong elite in gampong governance. Non-uniform honorary allocation for gampong governmental apparatus is one of indicators of weak role and function of gampong cultural institution because the previous inherent communal values have been calculated economically.]]>
<![CDATA[TRANSFORMASI PRANATA PATRONASE MASYARAKAT NELAYAN: DARI EKONOMI MORALITAS MENUJU EKONOMI PASAR ]]>
<![CDATA[-, Mirajiani]]>;
<![CDATA[S.Wahyuni, Ekawati]]>;
<![CDATA[Satria, Arif]]>;
<![CDATA[-, Saharuddin]]>;
<![CDATA[Kusumastanto, Tridoyo]]>
<![CDATA[ KOMUNITAS: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture Vol 6, No 1 (2014): Lokalitas, Relasi Kuasa dan Transformasi Sosial ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v6i1.2950
<![CDATA[Masyarakat nelayan  mengalami transformasi sosial ekonomi akibat penetrasi pembangunan dan pasar. Transformasi sosial ekonomi yang terjadi membawa perubahan signifikan pranata ekonomi nelayan, karena nelayan harus mengkonstruksikan  pranata ekonomi baru yang dianggap dapat mempertahankan penghidupan nelayan pada kondisi survival dan sesuai dengan perubahan yang terjadi. Penelitian ini mendalami bagaimana  transformasi pranata patronase  yang terjadi dan keterkaitannya dengan keterjaminan ekonomi pada masyarakat nelayan di Pesisir  Ujung Kulon.  Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan tipe penelitian studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan masyarakat nelayan di Pesisir Ujung Kulon mengalami transformasi pranata ekonomi dari patronase  berbasis moralitas menjadi berbasis norma ekonomi pasar. Di era ekonomi pasar, patronase  merupakan suatu alternatif pranata ekonomi nelayan yang dibangun  untuk tetap bertahan dengan situasi krisis dan ketidakpastian ekonomi serta mata pencaharian yang bersifat fluktuatif.  Ditinjau  dari keterjaminan ekonomi, pranata patronase moralitas di masa lalu lebih memberikan jaminan  ekonomi nelayan pada situasi krisis daripada pranata patronase berbasis norma ekonomi pasar.  Pada situasi di mana pranata patronase tidak bisa sepenuhnya berfungsi sebagai pranata jaminan ekonomi nelayan,  maka untuk tetap bertahan  pada situasi ekonomi yang kurang terjamin  nelayan mengandalkan relasi ekonomi alternatif yang disediakan pasar  di luar patronase. Fishing communities experiencing socio-economic transformation as a result of development and market penetration. Socio-economic transformation is followed by significant change in economic institutions, as fishermen have to construct a new economic institutions which are supposed to maintain the livelihood in survival conditions and in accordance with the changes. This research was to explore how economic institution transformation happens and its effect on  economic security in coastal fishing communities in Ujung Kulon. The method uses a qualitative approach and the type of research uses a case study research. Results of the research showed coastal fishing communities in Ujung Kulon transformed economic institutions of patronage based morality becomes the norm based market economy. In the era of market economy, patronage remains an alternative economic institutions built to survive the crisis and uncertainty and livelihood fluctuated. The fact is related to economic security, institutional patronage morality in the past to provide security over the fishing economy in crisis situations rather than norm -based patronage institutions of the market economy. In situations where the institution of patronage can not fully function as economic security institutions of fishermen, then to survive on less secure economic situation of fishermen rely on alternative economic relations are provided markets outside patronage]]>
<![CDATA[Vulnerability Analysis of Small Fishermen’s Household Livelihoods in Tegal City ]]>
<![CDATA[Nissa, Zulfa Nur Auliatun]]>;
<![CDATA[Dharmawan, Arya Hadi]]>;
<![CDATA[Saharuddin, Saharuddin]]>
<![CDATA[ KOMUNITAS: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture Vol 11, No 2 (2019): September ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v11i2.18583
<![CDATA[Small fishermen are known for being very dependent on fluctuating fish resources and the nature of open access fisheries which together cause resource degradation, poverty and marginalization. The problems of small-scale fisheries include low economic performance and limited ability or expertise in facing global pressure, including climate change. Based on the problems faced by small fishermen as described, it is certainly a separate danger on the fishermen's livelihood system which causes the livelihoods of small fishermen to be more vulnerable. The purpose of this study was to analyze the level of vulnerability of the livelihoods of small fishermen’s households. This research used quantitative methods supported by qualitative data. The study was conducted in Muarareja Sub-Districts, Tegal City, Central Java. This study was conducted using a livelihood vulnerability index questionnaire and in-depth interviews. Data was collected from forty respondents. This study found the fact that small scale fishermen both top and bottom layer in Muarareja village in which this study was conducted was not too vulnerable (resilient). However, they have a fairly good adaptive capacity with the use of capacity by using the livelihood capital optimally upper layer fishermen tend to use physical and financial capital to carry out exploitation and spatial strategies. On the other hand, the lower layers of fishermen mostly use their social capital such as affiliation with groups, high trust and patron-client systems based on moral economy.]]>
<![CDATA[The Existence of Gampong in the Middle of Changing Community ]]>
<![CDATA[Mahmuddin, Mahmuddin]]>;
<![CDATA[Kolopaking, Laura M]]>;
<![CDATA[Kinseng, Rilus A]]>;
<![CDATA[Wasistiono, Sadu]]>;
<![CDATA[Saharuddin, Saharuddin]]>
<![CDATA[ Komunitas Vol 8, No 1 (2016): March 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v8i1.4967
<![CDATA[The passage of Act No. 18, 2001 on regional autonomy and followed up with the issuance of Qanun No. 4, 2003 on mukim, and Qanun No. 5, 2003 on gampong and reinforced by UUPA No. 11, 2006 on Acehnese government is a history of social identity of Acehnese society, which has been neglected during the conflict. The regional government has made some breakthroughs and one of the breakthroughs was gampong revitalization through a program called “back to gampong”. The study aims to answer the dynamic of revitalization of gampong institution in the middle of special autonomy implementation and the implementation of Qanun gampong in the administration of gampong institution. The study shows that the implementation of program “back to gampong” encourages the strengthening process of gampong institution as well as weakens the institution itself. The development of gampong that focuses on physical aspect has created coordination gap among officials of gampong institution in planning system and financial management. The tug in the mechanism of financial development and management at gampong has created a space for the involvement and influence from gampong elite in gampong governance. Non-uniform honorary allocation for gampong governmental apparatus is one of indicators of weak role and function of gampong cultural institution because the previous inherent communal values have been calculated economically.]]>
<![CDATA[TRANSFORMASI PRANATA PATRONASE MASYARAKAT NELAYAN: DARI EKONOMI MORALITAS MENUJU EKONOMI PASAR ]]>
<![CDATA[-, Mirajiani]]>;
<![CDATA[S.Wahyuni, Ekawati]]>;
<![CDATA[Satria, Arif]]>;
<![CDATA[-, Saharuddin]]>;
<![CDATA[Kusumastanto, Tridoyo]]>
<![CDATA[ Komunitas Vol 6, No 1 (2014): March 2014 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v6i1.2950
<![CDATA[Masyarakat nelayan mengalami transformasi sosial ekonomi akibat penetrasi pembangunan dan pasar. Transformasi sosial ekonomi yang terjadi membawa perubahan signifikan pranata ekonomi nelayan, karena nelayan harus mengkonstruksikan pranata ekonomi baru yang dianggap dapat mempertahankan penghidupan nelayan pada kondisi survival dan sesuai dengan perubahan yang terjadi. Penelitian ini mendalami bagaimana transformasi pranata patronase yang terjadi dan keterkaitannya dengan keterjaminan ekonomi pada masyarakat nelayan di Pesisir Ujung Kulon. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan tipe penelitian studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan masyarakat nelayan di Pesisir Ujung Kulon mengalami transformasi pranata ekonomi dari patronase berbasis moralitas menjadi berbasis norma ekonomi pasar. Di era ekonomi pasar, patronase merupakan suatu alternatif pranata ekonomi nelayan yang dibangun untuk tetap bertahan dengan situasi krisis dan ketidakpastian ekonomi serta mata pencaharian yang bersifat fluktuatif. Ditinjau dari keterjaminan ekonomi, pranata patronase moralitas di masa lalu lebih memberikan jaminan ekonomi nelayan pada situasi krisis daripada pranata patronase berbasis norma ekonomi pasar. Pada situasi di mana pranata patronase tidak bisa sepenuhnya berfungsi sebagai pranata jaminan ekonomi nelayan, maka untuk tetap bertahan pada situasi ekonomi yang kurang terjamin nelayan mengandalkan relasi ekonomi alternatif yang disediakan pasar di luar patronase. Fishing communities experiencing socio-economic transformation as a result of development and market penetration. Socio-economic transformation is followed by significant change in economic institutions, as fishermen have to construct a new economic institutions which are supposed to maintain the livelihood in survival conditions and in accordance with the changes. This research was to explore how economic institution transformation happens and its effect on economic security in coastal fishing communities in Ujung Kulon. The method uses a qualitative approach and the type of research uses a case study research. Results of the research showed coastal fishing communities in Ujung Kulon transformed economic institutions of patronage based morality becomes the norm based market economy. In the era of market economy, patronage remains an alternative economic institutions built to survive the crisis and uncertainty and livelihood fluctuated. The fact is related to economic security, institutional patronage morality in the past to provide security over the fishing economy in crisis situations rather than norm -based patronage institutions of the market economy. In situations where the institution of patronage can not fully function as economic security institutions of fishermen, then to survive on less secure economic situation of fishermen rely on alternative economic relations are provided markets outside patronage]]>
