Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
11.771
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Yustisia Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurisprudentie PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Unram Law Review Hasanuddin Law Review Jurnal Panorama Hukum TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat DE'RECHTSSTAAT Jambura Law Review Jurnal Yuridis Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Veteran Law Review Jurnal Hukum Positum Pusaka : Jurnal Khazanah Keagamaan Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Media Iuris Borneo Law Review Journal Jurnal Medika Hutama Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Journal of Judicial Review Amsir Law Jurnal (ALJ) Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) ABDI MOESTOPO: Jurnal Pengabdian pada Masyarakat KESANS : International Journal of Health and Science Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Journal Evidence Of Law Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Kesehatan (JHEK) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Lead Journal of Economy and Administration Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Intellektika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Jurnal KALANDRA Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Journal Social Sciences and Humanioran Review Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research Journal of Law and Legal Reform HUMANIORASAINS Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Referendum International Journal of Law and Society Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum International Journal of Sociology and Law Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum Dan Administrasi Publik International Journal of Social Science and Humanity Pemuliaan Keadilan Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum Statuta Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan IPSSJ J-CEKI Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Abdurrauf Science and Society JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Indonesia Media Law Review International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law HOKI : Journal of Islamic Family Law
Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 100 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 100 Documents
Search

 4   5   6   7   8 
Legal Protection for Doctors in Medical Practice Using Telemedicine According to Law Number 17 of 2023 Concerning Health Fakhrurrozi Fakhrurrozi; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i2.352

Abstract

Health is a basic right guaranteed by the Indonesian constitution, as stipulated in Article 28H of the 1945 Constitution and Article 34 paragraph (3), which states that the state is responsible for the provision of adequate health care facilities for all citizens. Nonetheless, challenges in the provision of health services in remote areas are still significant, especially related to the limitations of facilities, medical personnel, and service quality. The development of technology, particularly telemedicine, has opened up new opportunities in the delivery of health services, which can overcome geographical limitations and improve community access to medical services. The type of research in this study is normative juridical. The research results in this discussion are the protection of doctors and the regulation of telemedicine policies in Indonesia, by reviewing Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health regarding the implementation of telemedicine between health service facilities. Although telemedicine can expand access to health, the risks associated with remote diagnosis and treatment require special attention in terms of legal protection of health workers. Therefore, adaptive legal tools are needed to accommodate the growing development of health technology and provide legal protection for the parties involved in the implementation of online-based health services.
Analisis Terkait Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Penganiayan Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Forensik Adinda Kusumaning Ratri; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober : Mahkamah:Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v1i4.175

Abstract

The examination of a criminal case in the judicial process is essentially aimed at finding the material truth of the case. Along with the increase in criminal cases with various motives and modes, science is needed to support the interests of law enforcers. Forensic medicine or also known as judicial medicine is becoming increasingly important for the judicial process to obtain justice. This research discusses evidence in the crime of persecution from the point of view of forensic law. In this research, the author uses normative legal research methods using legal sources from primary legal materials in the form of environmental law legislation and secondary legal materials in the form of books and articles on waste management. The conclusion obtained in this paper is that Visum et Repertum is one of the valid evidence in the process of proving persecution cases, the role of forensic doctors can be as Visum et Repertum makers and doctors as expert witnesses.
Urgensi Visum Et Repertum dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Tri Bowo Hersandy Febrianto; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v1i4.375

Abstract

Visum et repertum is a statement made by a forensic doctor at the written request of an investigator for the purposes of proof in a criminal act, one of which is the crime of murder. Visum et repertum is used as a substitute for the corpse of a crime victim who cannot possibly be presented in court, so it plays a very important role in revealing the identity, time and cause of death.  This research aims to explain the urgency of the post mortem et repertum in proving the crime of murder so that the resolution of the case becomes clear and clear. The approach method used is normative juridical which is an approach carried out based on the main legal material by examining theories, concepts, legal principles and statutory regulations and by using one of the Marsinah cases as a benchmark for the urgency of post mortem. et repert. The results of the research show that post mortem et repertum has an important role in proving the crime of murder, namely that it can help provide clues to the identity, time and cause of death of the murder victim.
Legal Standing and Authority of the Regional Representative Council in the Indonesia Constitusional System Imran, Imran; Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi; Achmad, Dirga
Amsir Law Journal Vol 1 No 2 (2020): April
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36746/alj.v1i2.23

Abstract

The Regional Representative Council (DPD) as a regional representative institution is located as a state institution. The existence of the DPD reflects the principle of territorial or regional representation (regional representation). Therefore, as a representative institution, the DPD should ideally have the legislative, supervisory and budgetary functions as well as the House of Representatives (DPR). However, the DPD as a representative institution with these three functions actually has a very weak and soft function. The two chambers of the House of Representatives (DPR and DPD) do not have balanced authority. DPD and DPR are two rooms (houses, chambers) whose authority is not balanced, because it is classified as soft bicameral.
Studi Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Indonesia dan Malaysia dalam Penegakan Hukum Angel Evelin Saragih Sitio; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/demokrasi.v2i3.996

Abstract

Law enforcement is a fundamental pillar in upholding justice and maintaining social order. Indonesia and Malaysia, as neighboring countries with shared historical backgrounds and legal systems—both influenced by Continental European law and local customary laws—demonstrate different approaches in their judicial systems and law enforcement practices. This study aims to compare the judicial systems of both countries in terms of law enforcement, focusing on institutional structures, criminal and civil court mechanisms, and the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies such as the police, prosecution, and judiciary. The research employs a qualitative method with a juridical-comparative approach, analyzing legal documents, legislation, and scholarly literature. The findings reveal that although both countries share basic legal principles, significant differences exist in terms of judicial independence, procedural efficiency, as well as transparency and accountability of law enforcement institutions. This study is expected to contribute to the reform of Indonesia’s judicial system by adopting positive practices from the Malaysian legal framework.
Efektivitas Omnibus Law terhadap Perlindungan Tenaga Medis di Indonesia dalam Perbandingan dengan Sistem Hukum Malaysia Maryanto Maryanto; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar; Muthia Sakti
Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/demokrasi.v2i3.1017

Abstract

The comparison of health law between Indonesia andMalaysia covers critical aspects of the healthcare system that influence the quality of life of their citizens. This study primarily focuses on occupational health and safety (OHS) for healthcare workers. According to global data, Malaysia has a better healthcare system compared to Indonesia, as reflected in its higher ranking on the Health Care Index. In Indonesia,health law regulations often undergo changes and revisions,such as the enactment of the Omnibus Law, which consolidates various health sector regulations. However, this has raised concerns about the diminishing legal protection for healthcare workers. In contrast, Malaysia presents a more structured system, with the integration of health and labor institutions through the Department of Occupational Safety And Health (DOSH), which ensures better workplace safety and clearer standards. This research adopts a descriptive qualitative approach by analyzing legal documents such as Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health in Indonesia and the Occupational Safety and Health Act in Malaysia. The Malaysian approach is more preventive and promotive in nature, differing from Indonesia’s curative-dominated model. The study aims to compare the legal health regulations of both countries, assess their implementation effectiveness, and offer policy recommendations based on best practices applied inMalaysia to improve the quality of healthcare services inIndonesia. The findings reveal that although Indonesia has significant potential in the health sector, weak regulation implementation and supervision remain major obstacles. Therefore, a more structured and efficient regulatory reform is needed to enhance legal protection for healthcare workers and improve health services.
Perbandingan Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia dan Malaysia Tasya Darosyifa; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i2.1819

Abstract

Corruption remains a serious issue that hinders development and erodes public trust in the government, particularly in countries like Indonesia and Malaysia. Both nations have long histories of dealing with systemic corruption. This study aims to compare the legal systems and anti-corruption law enforcement in Indonesia and Malaysia to identify challenges and areas for improvement. The research uses a descriptive qualitative method with a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, analyzing legal documents, academic journals, and regulations related to anti-corruption agencies in both countries. This study employs legal system theory and institutional theory. The main problem examined is how anti-corruption law enforcement differs between Indonesia and Malaysia and what the main enforcement challenges are. The findings show that while Indonesia’s Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) was once powerful, recent political interference and regulatory revisions have weakened its impact. Conversely, Malaysia has more comprehensive legal instruments, but its enforcement agencies struggle with independence and political pressure. In conclusion, both countries must strengthen legal supremacy, institutional independence, and public engagement to enhance the effectiveness of anti-corruption efforts.
Perbandingan Hukum Perdata di Negara-Negara Asean Kajian Terhadap Perbandingan Indonesia dan Malaysia Ariel Lois; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i2.1822

Abstract

This study examines the comparative analysis of civil law systems between Indonesia and Malaysia, which adhere to the Civil Law and Common Law systems, respectively. Indonesia implements the Civil Law system, inherited from Dutch colonial rule and based on the Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW), whereas Malaysia adopts the Common Law system, derived from the English legal tradition. The fundamental difference between these systems lies in their sources of law, where Civil Law prioritizes codification through written statutes, while Common Law relies on jurisprudence and judicial precedents. Additionally, Malaysia employs a mixed legal system, incorporating elements of Customary Law and Islamic Law in specific legal matters. This study further explores the potential for harmonization of civil law between Indonesia and Malaysia through the Private International Law (PIL) framework, which facilitates cross-border dispute resolution based on the lex patriae and lex domicilii principles. By employing a Juridical-Normative methodology and adopting Comparative, Analytical, and Conceptual approaches, this research underscores the significance of understanding legal system differences to enhance legal cooperation between the two nations.
Analisis Perbandingan Syarat Jumlah Utang dalam Permohonan Kepailitan di Indonesia dengan Malaysia sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum bagi Debitor Hendra Parulian; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar; Atik Winanti
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i3.998

Abstract

Bankruptcy petitions in Indonesia are regulated under Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU), which stipulates that a debtor may be declared bankrupt if they have at least two debts, one of which is due and collectible. However, this provision does not specify a minimum debt threshold as a requirement for bankruptcy, thereby creating a legal loophole that creditors may exploit by using bankruptcy as a mere debt collection tool. This raises concerns regarding the legal protection of debtors. This study aims to compare the bankruptcy laws of Indonesia and Malaysia, particularly with regard to the minimum debt amount requirement, and to evaluate whether the conditions for bankruptcy under the Indonesian Bankruptcy Law and PKPU provide legal certainty and adequate protection for debtors. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that the current provisions in Indonesia are no longer aligned with present-day needs and are prone to abuse. Unlike Malaysia, which stipulates a minimum debt amount, Indonesia has yet to regulate this matter explicitly. Therefore, a reformulation of Indonesia's bankruptcy law is necessary to ensure fairness, prevent misuse, and provide balanced legal protection for all parties, especially debtors.
Perbandingan Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia dalam Kepemilikan Properti oleh Warga Negara Asing Ligina Tesalonika; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar; Atik Winanti
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i3.999

Abstract

Globalization has increased the interest of Foreign Nationals (WNA) in owning property in various countries, whether for residential purposes, holidays, or investment. Indonesia and Malaysia, as two Southeast Asian nations, have different regulatory approaches regarding property ownership by WNA. This research aims to analyze the legal provisions, identify similarities and differences in regulations, and evaluate their impact on the investment climate and legal protection for WNA in both countries. The research method used is comparative law, focusing on the legal basis, forms of ownership, limitations, and legal protection. The findings indicate that Indonesia tends to be protective of land ownership by foreign parties, strictly regulated through the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) No. 5 of 1960, which limits WNA to Right of Use (Hak Pakai) and Right to Build (Hak Guna Bangunan/HGB) with limited durations. In contrast, Malaysia adopts a more liberal and pro-investment approach, allowing WNA to own property as freehold or leasehold based on the National Land Code 1965 and the Malaysia My Second Home (MM2H) program. The implications of these differences are that Indonesia's restrictive policies may reduce the attractiveness of foreign investment due to legal ambiguity and limitations in secondary transactions. Meanwhile, Malaysia offers greater legal certainty and economic appeal through freehold ownership, despite social risks such as rising property prices. This study concludes that Malaysia has a more foreigner-friendly system for property ownership, while Indonesia maintains a cautious principle. It is suggested that Indonesia consider agrarian reforms that are more transparent and provide legal certainty that balances national interests with foreign investment attractiveness.
Co-Authors A, Biyandra Timothee Abdul Haris Nafis Abdul Kholiq Abdul Kholiq Abdul Kolib Abidahsari, Irma Achmad, Dirga Adfiyanti Fadjar Adhyarsa, Bayu Aji Adiatma Nugroho Adiesty S.P. Syamsuddin Adinda Kusumaning Ratri Aditama Candra Kusuma Adityarahman, Dimas Afifa, Erina Nur Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Aisyah Nurhalizah Aji Lukman Ibrahim Al Fath Al Fath Alawiyah, Suryani Albert Sintong Limbong Amriyanto Ananta, Muhammad Daffa Angel Evelin Saragih Sitio Anggita Fitriyani, Jeanny Anni Alvionita Simanjuntak Ariel Lois Arofah, Muhammad Nouval Asriadi Asriadi Atik Winanti Aulyanti, Davina Dewi Ayu Diah Rahmani Azizah Arfah Bachrong, Faizal Bakhtiar, Handina Sulastrina Bambang Waluyo Barlean, Sereno Khalfan Beniharmoni Harefa Budiman, Jodhy Farrel Cahyaningsih, Rohmah Dwi Cahyasabrina, Ghea Tyagita Christiansen, Nicholas Christloy Totota Karo-Karo Cynthia, Agnes Darmawati Darmawati Davina Dewi Daya Nur Pratama Desthabu, Meurina Deviana Cahya Fitri Diah Ayu Wulandari, Diah Ayu Diani Sadiawati Dwiastuti, Winda Enina Wika Vetricha Wulandari Erlyani, Rizka Erva Yunita Fakhrurrozi Fakhrurrozi Falevi, Yunizar FANDY GULTOM Fattah, Akhmad Kautsar Febriani, Anggie Feby Welgaputri, Feby x Fil'Awalin, Hanif Geraldine, Mohammad Al Rainer Gilang Bhaswara, Nadhif Halomoan, Febrian Hamid, Abd. Haris Handoyo Prasetyo Hanifa Muslimah, Rifa’at Hanna Wijaya Hanna Wijaya Hendra Parulian Heru Suyanto Hilda Novyana Husen Alting Ibrahim, Kayode Muhammed Ilyas Rahman Imran Imran Indiyarto, Fadhil Muhammad Irwan Triadi Ishma Safira Iwan Erar Joesoef Jeanny Anggita Fitriyani Jimmi Dohar Pandapotan Kayode Muhammed Ibrahim Khoyron Nasir, Tomi Kunthi Tridewiyanti Ligina Tesalonika M. Rizki Yudha Prawira Maddussila, Samsu Alam Manga Patila Maniari, Elsa Maria Yohana Marif Marif, Marif Marito, Eugina Evita Maryanto Maryanto Marzuki, Fathur Masse, Syukri Maulida Fitriani Michelle Angelika S Milda, Nofi Mochammad Ferdinan Adzhani Muhammad Fauzan Muhammad fauzan Muhammad Ikbal Muhammad Naufal, Muhammad Muhammad Yunus Idy Musran, Andi Mustawa, Mustawa Muthia Sakti Nada Prima Dirkareshza Nada Syifa Nurulhuda Naufal Nabiil Ridwansyah Novianti Novianti Nurhaedah Nurhaedah Nurhaedah Nurhayati Mardin Nurul Miqat Parhusip, Alizcia Dora Phuoc, Jeong Chun Pradipta Prihantono Prayitno Imam Santosa Purba, Hotmaita Arta Putra, Grahadi Purna Putri Eriana, Nadhifa Rafif Sani Rafika Nur Raka Haikal Anfasya Rakhbir Singh Ratu Ratna Korompot Respati, Adnasohn Aqilla Rio Wirawan Riyanto Riyanto Riyanto Riyanto Rosita Miladmahesi Rosmaida, Erviyanti Safa Mutiara, Ayu Safitri, Nadila Safrin Salam Salma Agustina Salma Agustina Samsu Alam Maddussila Sandra Amelia Setya Abrilrizky, Haryadian Siregar, Karina Josephine Situmeang, Zefanya Angelica Slamet Tri Wahyudi Sofyan Sauri Suci Maharani, Asari Suherman, Suherman Sulthoni Ajie Sahidin Sunardi Purwanda Suyanto, Heru Syabilal Ali SYAHRUL RAMADHAN, MUHAMMAD Syamsuddin, Adiesty Septhiany Prihatiningsih Syamsul Hadi Tarisa Sabrina, Fadiah Tasya Darosyifa Tri Bowo Hersandy Febrianto Tuasalamony, Adzra Ardelia Tulus Mampetua Lumban Gaol Vedita Akbar Virna Amalia Nur Permata Welgaputri, Feby Witasya Aurelia Sulaeman Wulandari, Vidia Ayu Yana Sylvana Yohanes Firmansyah Yuliana Yuli Wahyuningsih Yuliana, Adelia Zahra, Lintang Aulia Zain, Abyan Zanubiya, Siti Syafa Az