Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
11.771
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Yustisia Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurisprudentie PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Unram Law Review Hasanuddin Law Review Jurnal Panorama Hukum TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat DE'RECHTSSTAAT Jambura Law Review Jurnal Yuridis Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Veteran Law Review Jurnal Hukum Positum Pusaka : Jurnal Khazanah Keagamaan Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Media Iuris Borneo Law Review Journal Jurnal Medika Hutama Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Journal of Judicial Review Amsir Law Jurnal (ALJ) Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) ABDI MOESTOPO: Jurnal Pengabdian pada Masyarakat KESANS : International Journal of Health and Science Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Journal Evidence Of Law Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Kesehatan (JHEK) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Lead Journal of Economy and Administration Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Intellektika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Jurnal KALANDRA Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Journal Social Sciences and Humanioran Review Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research Journal of Law and Legal Reform HUMANIORASAINS Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Referendum International Journal of Law and Society Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum International Journal of Sociology and Law Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum Dan Administrasi Publik International Journal of Social Science and Humanity Pemuliaan Keadilan Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum Statuta Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan IPSSJ J-CEKI Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Abdurrauf Science and Society JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Indonesia Media Law Review International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law HOKI : Journal of Islamic Family Law
Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 100 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 100 Documents
Search

 5   6   7   8   9 
Ideal Model in Law: Journalists and Application in Press Reporting Mustawa, Mustawa; Hamid, Abd. Haris; Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi; Musran, Andi; Asriadi, Asriadi; Masse, Syukri
Amsir Law Journal Vol 6 No 2 (2025): April
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36746/alj.v6i2.654

Abstract

The appointment of journalists, especially in the field of legal coverage, is extremely urgent and has a wide- ranging impact on conveying information containing truth values, in order to realize a free and responsible press. The manifestation of this responsibility, however, is not accompanied by a system for the appointment of journalists, leading to the dissemination of information that triggers inaccuracies in news, resulting in legal claims, both criminal and civil. These claims continue to occur, and the number of journalists entangled in legal issues also continues to increase. All of this is caused by laxity, both in Law Number 40 of 1999 and in the Press Council Regulations, which do not regulate the standards for the appointment of the journalistic profession. This laxity has triggered the idea of creating a system for the appointment of legal journalists based on the affirmation of a profession that meets professional standards through an ideal model, the regulation of which lies within a legal framework. ___ References Books with an author: Gant, S. (2007). We're all journalists now: The transformation of the press and reshaping of the law in the internet age, New York: Free Press. Haltom, W., & McCann, M. Distorting the Law: Politics, Media, and the Litigation Crisis, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Kolodzy, J. (2006). Convergence journalism: Writing and reporting across the news media. NY: Rowman & Littlefield. Manning, P. (2000). News and news sources: A critical introduction, UK: De Montfort University. McNair, B. (2006). Cultural chaos: journalism and power in a globalised world. London: Routledge. Mustawa. (2020). Hukum Pemberitaan Pers, Sebuah Model Mencegah Kesalahan Berita, Jakarta: Kencana (Prenada Media Grup). Plaisance, P. L. (2013). Media ethics: Key principles for responsible practice, LA: Sage Publications. Waisbord, S. (2013). Reinventing professionalism: Journalism and news in global perspective. UK: Polity Press. Journal articles: Akbar, A., Mannan, K., & Saputra, I. R. (2023). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Tindakan Pencemaran Nama Baik. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 150-156. http://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/index.php/julia/article/view/260 Ambarwati, A., Rahman, S., Qahar, A., & Poernomo, S. L. The Essence of the Principle of Good Faith in the Agreement For The Parties. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 27, 36-43. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2708063643 Astuti, T., Purwanda, S., Prasisto, J., & Prayudi, P. (2024). PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEREDARAN OBAT TANPA IZIN EDAR:(Studi Putusan Nomor 1/Pid. Sus/2023/Pn. Pre). Jurnal Hukum Positum, 9(1), 1-16. https://journal.unsika.ac.id/positum/article/view/11132 Balla, H., Jumardin, J., Kasim, A., & Pappa, A. K. (2024). Peran Locus dan Tempus Delicti dalam Menentukan Kompetensi Pengadilan pada Kasus Kejahatan Siber. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 11(4), 390-395. https://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/index.php/julia/article/view/564 Djanggih, H., Syam, E. S., & Gunawan, S. (2023). The Prosecutor's Legal Policy In Enacting Restorative Justice On Criminal Case. Russian Law Journal, 11(3), 1349-1357. http://repository.umi.ac.id/2370/ Ettema, J. S. (2007). Journalism as reason-giving: Deliberative democracy, institutional accountability, and the news media's mission. Political Communication, 24(2), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701312860 Gollmitzer, M. (2023). Journalism ethics with Foucault: Casually employed journalists’ constructions of professional integrity. Journalism, 24(5), 1015-1033. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211036301 Kasim, A., Suhariyanto, D., Ramdhani, W., Rahim, E. I., & Danial, D. (2024). Scenarios For Limiting The Veto of Permanent Members Of The United Nations Security Council. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 23(1), 499-517. https://jurnal.unikal.ac.id/index.php/hk/article/view/4163 Mustawa, M. (2019). Journalist Competence in Applying the Presumption of Innocence Principle on Press Release. Amsir Law Journal, 1(1), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.36746/alj.v1i1.20
Legal Regulation of Forensic Autopsies in the Criminal Investigation Process: A Study of Concepts and Legal Reform Subhandi Bakhtiar, Handar
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (July-August 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v4i5.667

Abstract

In criminal justice, forensic autopsies play a critical role in determining the cause and manner of death. Current provisions are unclear, leading to inconsistencies in the criminal investigation process. This study examines weaknesses in Indonesian law, particularly the ambiguity in regulating forensic autopsies, the obligation to conduct autopsies in suspected criminal deaths, and the procedures for notifying the victim's family. This study aims to provide an interpretation of the legal regulations concerning autopsies and to formulate regulatory reforms related to the conduct of autopsies in criminal investigation processes. The results of this study indicate that in criminal investigations, autopsies are crucial for determining the cause and manner of death, as well as providing scientific evidence linking the perpetrator's actions to the victim's death. However, ambiguity in interpreting the obligation to conduct autopsies under Article 134 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) leads to inconsistencies. To address this, clear regulations are needed to define when an autopsy is considered "very necessary," providing consistent guidance to investigators. Mandatory autopsies for all unnatural deaths would ensure thorough examinations. While families must be informed, their consent is not required, and obstructing an autopsy is a criminal offence, supported by Article 222 of the Criminal Code, as amended by Article 283 of Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code.
The Application of Trial as an Adult Concept in Indonesia: Justice for Victims in Juvenile Murder Cases Christiansen, Nicholas; Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1950

Abstract

The increasing incidence of serious crimes committed by juveniles, particularly murder, raises concerns about the adequacy of Indonesia’s juvenile justice system, which emphasizes rehabilitation over retribution. In contrast, the United States applies the "trial as an adult" concept, allowing juveniles to be tried in adult courts under specific conditions. This study employs a normative legal method using statute and comparative approaches to examine the potential application of this concept in Indonesia. It compares Indonesia's child protection-oriented framework with the U.S. waiver of jurisdiction mechanism. The findings reveal a legal gap in Indonesia’s system for handling grave offenses by juveniles, which often fails to provide substantive justice for victims. Therefore, the study proposes a hybrid judicial model that balances child protection with victim justice by introducing a dual-track court system and proportional sentencing tailored to juvenile maturity and offense severity
Analisis Yuridis Perkembangan Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia dan Malaysia : (Studi Perbandingan Hukum) Raka Haikal Anfasya; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar; Atik Winanti
Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
Publisher : STIKes Ibnu Sina Ajibarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59841/intellektika.v3i3.2791

Abstract

This research analyzes the legal development of Islamic banking in Indonesia and Malaysia through a comparative law approach. Islamic banking has become an important component of the global financial system, yet its growth varies across countries. Indonesia's Islamic banking industry, while experiencing significant progress in recent years, still faces regulatory and institutional challenges. In contrast, Malaysia has emerged as a global hub for Islamic finance due to its integrated regulatory framework, strong government support, centralized Shariah compliance system, and established human resource development. This study employs normative legal research using primary and secondary legal sources, and applies comparative legal theory. The findings highlight the importance of legal harmonization, centralization of fatwa authorities, active government involvement, and comprehensive infrastructure development in supporting the growth of Islamic banking. Lessons from Malaysia's experience can serve as valuable references for Indonesia to enhance its Islamic banking industry and improve its competitiveness in the global market.
Perbandingan Royalty Hak Cipta Menjadi Harta Bersama Antara Indonesia dan Malaysia Maulida Fitriani; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
Publisher : STIKes Ibnu Sina Ajibarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59841/intellektika.v3i3.2792

Abstract

Copyright royalties as an economic object in intellectual property are of particular concern in family law, especially when associated with their status as joint property in marriage. This study aims to examine and compare how the Indonesian and Malaysian legal systems regulate the distribution of copyright royalties in the context of divorce. In Indonesia, the concept of joint property is regulated in Law Number 1 of 1974, which was updated by Law Number 16 of 2019, as well as in the Compilation of Islamic Law. Meanwhile, in Malaysia, different Islamic family laws between states provide a basis for the division of joint property, including royalties, by considering the contribution of the spouse. This study uses a normative-comparative approach through literature study and analysis of legal documents. It was found that despite the differences in legal systems, both countries in principle recognize copyright royalties as part of joint property if they meet certain requirements, especially regarding the time of acquisition and the contribution of the spouse. This study emphasizes the importance of the principle of justice in the division of intangible assets in the context of a household.
Perbandingan Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia dan Malaysia Vedita Akbar; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
Publisher : STIKes Ibnu Sina Ajibarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59841/intellektika.v3i3.2793

Abstract

This study discusses the comparison of labor law between Indonesia and Malaysia, focusing on the regulation of employment relations, worker protection, wage systems, and outsourcing practices. Indonesia, through Law Number 6 of 2023, strengthens labor regulations by emphasizing worker protection, whereas Malaysia, through the Employment Act 1955, emphasizes flexibility in employment relationships with minimum protection. This research uses normative legal research methods and a comparative law approach. The results show that Indonesia prioritizes structural and formal worker protection, while Malaysia emphasizes administrative efficiency. This study recommends strengthening worker protection in both countries and the need for harmonization of labor standards within the ASEAN region.
Implementasi Kebijakan Ekonomi Hijau dalam Mendukung Pembangunan Nasional Berkelanjutan Secara Inklusif Azizah Arfah; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar; Atik Winanti
Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
Publisher : STIKes Ibnu Sina Ajibarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59841/intellektika.v3i4.2818

Abstract

This study discusses the comparison of green economic policies implemented between Indonesia and Malaysia in supporting inclusive sustainable national development, which is examined normatively through a comparative study approach. Indonesia, through Law No. 30 of 2007 on Energy, Law No. 21 of 2014 on Geothermal Energy, and other regulations, has established a national green program encompassing environmental quality improvement, disaster resilience and climate change mitigation, low-carbon development, and renewable energy development as pillars of national development. Meanwhile, Malaysia's National Energy Policy 2022-2040 and other regulations stipulate that a green economy can be achieved through economic development, the utilization of sustainable energy resources, and environmental quality. Research findings indicate that Indonesia has not maximized the implementation of a green economy due to the ease of business permits granted to investors and limited regulations within specific scopes, while Malaysia has established more complex regulations regarding green investments, ensuring that permits are not issued arbitrarily.
Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Konstitusi Indonesia dan Malaysia dalam Pemilihan Kepala Pemerintahan Sulthoni Ajie Sahidin; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v2i3.1120

Abstract

The selection of the head of government is a fundamental aspect of the constitutional system that reflects the political and legal character of a state. Although Indonesia and Malaysia share similar historical roots, they adopt significantly different systems of governance. This study addresses two core issues which are about the structure and mechanism of executive and legislative power, and the impact of the presidential threshold and parliamentary coalition on governmental stability. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and comparative approaches, the findings reveal that Indonesia, under a presidential system, applies a nomination threshold to ensure political stability, yet it may restrict political access. Meanwhile, Malaysia’s parliamentary system is more flexible but vulnerable to instability due to coalition dynamics. This study recommends a reassessment of Indonesia’s presidential threshold for a more democratic process and strengthening of political stability mechanisms in Malaysia.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia Adhyarsa, Bayu Aji; Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi
Abdurrauf Science and Society Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Abdurrauf Science and Society
Publisher : Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70742/asoc.v1i4.287

Abstract

The intensification of economic relations between both countries, reaching USD 19.2 billion in 2022, creates an urgent need for effective and predictable dispute resolution mechanisms. Employing normative juridical methods with comparative legal approach, this study examines the arbitration legal framework of both countries through comprehensive analysis of Indonesia's Law No. 30/1999 and Malaysia's Arbitration Act 2005. The findings reveal fundamental differences in philosophical approaches, where Indonesia implements a hybrid system integrating UNCITRAL Model Law with civil law characteristics and national legal values, while Malaysia adopts a direct adoption approach with minimal intervention principles. Significant disparities are identified in arbitrability concepts, formal requirements for arbitration agreements, and award enforcement mechanisms. Indonesia applies a restrictive approach with intensive court supervision, whereas Malaysia employs a liberal approach with an integrated system. Institutional capacity differences between BANI and AIAC also create challenges in harmonizing bilateral arbitration practices. This research recommends developing bilateral arbitration protocols, establishing joint arbitration panels, and harmonizing legal frameworks to enhance the effectiveness of Indonesia-Malaysia commercial dispute resolution. Abstrak: Intensifikasi hubungan ekonomi kedua negara yang mencapai USD 19,2 miliar pada tahun 2022 menciptakan kebutuhan mendesak akan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang efektif dan dapat diprediksi. Menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum, penelitian ini mengkaji framework hukum arbitrase kedua negara melalui analisis komprehensif terhadap UU No. 30/1999 Indonesia dan Arbitration Act 2005 Malaysia. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan perbedaan fundamental dalam pendekatan filosofis, dimana Indonesia menerapkan sistem hibrida yang memadukan UNCITRAL Model Law dengan karakteristik civil law dan nilai hukum nasional, sementara Malaysia mengadopsi pendekatan adopsi langsung dengan prinsip minimal intervention. Disparitas signifikan teridentifikasi dalam konsep arbitrabilitas, persyaratan formal perjanjian arbitrase, dan mekanisme pelaksanaan putusan. Indonesia menerapkan pendekatan restriktif dengan pengawasan pengadilan intensif, sedangkan Malaysia menggunakan pendekatan liberal dengan sistem terpadu. Perbedaan kapasitas institusional antara BANI dan AIAC juga menciptakan tantangan dalam harmonisasi praktik arbitrase bilateral. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pengembangan protokol arbitrase bilateral, pembentukan panel arbitrase bersama, dan harmonisasi kerangka hukum untuk meningkatkan efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa komersial Indonesia-Malaysia. Kata kunci: Arbitrase Komersial; Harmonisasi Hukum; Penyelesaian Sengketa Bilateral
Bullion Bank Regulation in Indonesia in an Effort to Protect Customers Sofyan Sauri; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar; Atik Winanti
Lead Journal of Economy and Administration Vol 3 No 4 (2025): Lead Journal of Economy and Administration (LEJEA)
Publisher : International Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56403/lejea.v3i4.296

Abstract

The development of the global financial system has encouraged various countries to adopt bullion banks as an alternative to the gold-based financial system. However, in Indonesia, the concept of bullion banks is still relatively new and does not yet have a clear legal framework. This study aims to examine the need for bullion bank regulation in Indonesia and to assess the suitability of the national legal framework with international practices. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and comparative studies. The results of the study show that Indonesia does not yet have specific regulations regarding bullion banks, which has the potential to cause legal uncertainty for business actors and investors. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate comprehensive regulations to regulate bullion bank activities specifically to support the stability of the national financial system. This study recommends that policy makers immediately formulate regulations related to bullion banks by referring to best practices in other countries.
Co-Authors A, Biyandra Timothee Abdul Haris Nafis Abdul Kholiq Abdul Kholiq Abdul Kolib Abidahsari, Irma Achmad, Dirga Adfiyanti Fadjar Adhyarsa, Bayu Aji Adiatma Nugroho Adiesty S.P. Syamsuddin Adinda Kusumaning Ratri Aditama Candra Kusuma Adityarahman, Dimas Afifa, Erina Nur Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Aisyah Nurhalizah Aji Lukman Ibrahim Al Fath Al Fath Alawiyah, Suryani Albert Sintong Limbong Amriyanto Ananta, Muhammad Daffa Angel Evelin Saragih Sitio Anggita Fitriyani, Jeanny Anni Alvionita Simanjuntak Ariel Lois Arofah, Muhammad Nouval Asriadi Asriadi Atik Winanti Aulyanti, Davina Dewi Ayu Diah Rahmani Azizah Arfah Bachrong, Faizal Bakhtiar, Handina Sulastrina Bambang Waluyo Barlean, Sereno Khalfan Beniharmoni Harefa Budiman, Jodhy Farrel Cahyaningsih, Rohmah Dwi Cahyasabrina, Ghea Tyagita Christiansen, Nicholas Christloy Totota Karo-Karo Cynthia, Agnes Darmawati Darmawati Davina Dewi Daya Nur Pratama Desthabu, Meurina Deviana Cahya Fitri Diah Ayu Wulandari, Diah Ayu Diani Sadiawati Dwiastuti, Winda Enina Wika Vetricha Wulandari Erlyani, Rizka Erva Yunita Fakhrurrozi Fakhrurrozi Falevi, Yunizar FANDY GULTOM Fattah, Akhmad Kautsar Febriani, Anggie Feby Welgaputri, Feby x Fil'Awalin, Hanif Geraldine, Mohammad Al Rainer Gilang Bhaswara, Nadhif Halomoan, Febrian Hamid, Abd. Haris Handoyo Prasetyo Hanifa Muslimah, Rifa’at Hanna Wijaya Hanna Wijaya Hendra Parulian Heru Suyanto Hilda Novyana Husen Alting Ibrahim, Kayode Muhammed Ilyas Rahman Imran Imran Indiyarto, Fadhil Muhammad Irwan Triadi Ishma Safira Iwan Erar Joesoef Jeanny Anggita Fitriyani Jimmi Dohar Pandapotan Kayode Muhammed Ibrahim Khoyron Nasir, Tomi Kunthi Tridewiyanti Ligina Tesalonika M. Rizki Yudha Prawira Maddussila, Samsu Alam Manga Patila Maniari, Elsa Maria Yohana Marif Marif, Marif Marito, Eugina Evita Maryanto Maryanto Marzuki, Fathur Masse, Syukri Maulida Fitriani Michelle Angelika S Milda, Nofi Mochammad Ferdinan Adzhani Muhammad Fauzan Muhammad fauzan Muhammad Ikbal Muhammad Naufal, Muhammad Muhammad Yunus Idy Musran, Andi Mustawa, Mustawa Muthia Sakti Nada Prima Dirkareshza Nada Syifa Nurulhuda Naufal Nabiil Ridwansyah Novianti Novianti Nurhaedah Nurhaedah Nurhaedah Nurhayati Mardin Nurul Miqat Parhusip, Alizcia Dora Phuoc, Jeong Chun Pradipta Prihantono Prayitno Imam Santosa Purba, Hotmaita Arta Putra, Grahadi Purna Putri Eriana, Nadhifa Rafif Sani Rafika Nur Raka Haikal Anfasya Rakhbir Singh Ratu Ratna Korompot Respati, Adnasohn Aqilla Rio Wirawan Riyanto Riyanto Riyanto Riyanto Rosita Miladmahesi Rosmaida, Erviyanti Safa Mutiara, Ayu Safitri, Nadila Safrin Salam Salma Agustina Salma Agustina Samsu Alam Maddussila Sandra Amelia Setya Abrilrizky, Haryadian Siregar, Karina Josephine Situmeang, Zefanya Angelica Slamet Tri Wahyudi Sofyan Sauri Suci Maharani, Asari Suherman, Suherman Sulthoni Ajie Sahidin Sunardi Purwanda Suyanto, Heru Syabilal Ali SYAHRUL RAMADHAN, MUHAMMAD Syamsuddin, Adiesty Septhiany Prihatiningsih Syamsul Hadi Tarisa Sabrina, Fadiah Tasya Darosyifa Tri Bowo Hersandy Febrianto Tuasalamony, Adzra Ardelia Tulus Mampetua Lumban Gaol Vedita Akbar Virna Amalia Nur Permata Welgaputri, Feby Witasya Aurelia Sulaeman Wulandari, Vidia Ayu Yana Sylvana Yohanes Firmansyah Yuliana Yuli Wahyuningsih Yuliana, Adelia Zahra, Lintang Aulia Zain, Abyan Zanubiya, Siti Syafa Az