p-Index From 2021 - 2026
13.058
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Yustisia Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Jurisprudentie PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Unram Law Review Hasanuddin Law Review Jurnal Panorama Hukum TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat DE'RECHTSSTAAT Jambura Law Review Jurnal Yuridis Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Veteran Law Review Jurnal Hukum Positum Pusaka : Jurnal Khazanah Keagamaan Media Iuris Borneo Law Review Journal Jurnal Medika Hutama Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Journal of Judicial Review Amsir Law Jurnal (ALJ) Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) ABDI MOESTOPO: Jurnal Pengabdian pada Masyarakat KESANS : International Journal of Health and Science Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Journal Evidence Of Law Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Kesehatan (JHEK) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Lead Journal of Economy and Administration Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Intellektika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Jurnal KALANDRA Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Journal Social Sciences and Humanioran Review Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Referendum International Journal of Law and Society Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum International Journal of Sociology and Law Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum Dan Administrasi Publik International Journal of Social Science and Humanity Pemuliaan Keadilan Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum Statuta Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan IPSSJ Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Abdurrauf Science and Society JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Indonesia Media Law Review International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law HOKI : Journal of Islamic Family Law Journal of Law Perspectives Review Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik INLAW Ius Comparatum: Journal of Law Studies
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Analisis Perbandingan Kepailitan Harta Peninggalan Antara Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia Albert Sintong Limbong; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum dan Administrasi Publik Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum dan Administrasi Publik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/parlementer.v2i2.724

Abstract

This article discusses the comparative law between Indonesia and Malaysia regarding bankruptcy of inheritance left by a deceased testator. In Indonesia, Bankruptcy of Inheritance and Responsibility of Heirs Based on the "Burgerlijk Wetboek", with 2 (two) main issues, namely bankruptcy petitions based on debts from the testator and the responsibility of heirs who have received inheritances from deceased debtors. The main focus of this discussion is how each country regulates the possibility of inheritance being declared bankrupt, as well as the position of the heirs in the bankruptcy process. The method used in this study is normative juridical with a comparative law approach. The results of the analysis show that although Indonesia and Malaysia have similar legal system roots (civil law influenced by the Netherlands and England), there are differences in principle in the treatment of bankruptcy of inheritance. Indonesia allows bankrupt inheritance assets to be subject to bankruptcy under certain conditions, while Malaysia emphasizes the inheritance administration process without a formal bankruptcy approach. This study is important to provide an understanding for legal practitioners in dealing with inheritance dispute cases burdened with debt.
Pretrial Proceedings in Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law: Its Relation to Corruption Eradication Adiatma Nugroho; Beniharmoni Harefa; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
International Journal of Social Science and Humanity Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Social Science and Humanity
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijss.v2i2.375

Abstract

Pretrial proceedings play a strategic role in Indonesia's criminal justice system as a judicial oversight mechanism to ensure the legality of law enforcement actions and the protection of suspects’ human rights. In corruption cases, however, pretrial motions are often exploited as procedural loopholes to invalidate ongoing investigations due to the absence of rigid legal standards and inconsistent interpretations by judges sometimes extending into the merits of the case, which should fall outside the scope of pretrial jurisdiction. This study examines the ideal concept of pretrial review using a normative juridical approach, emphasizing the due process of law principle, the primacy of lex specialis under Article 26A of the Anti-Corruption Law, and its harmonization with the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The research concludes that pretrial mechanisms should function solely as limited judicial review, restricted to evaluating procedural legality. Additionally, the study highlights the significance of establishing Preliminary Examination Judges (Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan) as proposed in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code. These judges would proactively supervise investigative actions, ensuring procedural compliance and minimizing the misuse of pretrial remedies by corruption suspects. Strengthening normative frameworks and judicial guidelines is thus essential to foster coherent, fair rulings and support the integrity and effectiveness of anti-corruption law enforcement.
Analisis Perbandingan Standar Pembuktian Pidana Indonesia-Amerika Serikat: Studi Alat Bukti DNA sebagai Bukti Tunggal Mochammad Ferdinan Adzhani; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2025): Volume 12 Nomor 1 Juni 2025
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v12i1.57059

Abstract

This study examines the legal standing of DNA evidence as a sole means of proof within the criminal justice systems of Indonesia and the United States. DNA, known for its scientific reliability and high accuracy in identifying perpetrators, has received substantial recognition in the United States. Under the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard, DNA evidence in the U.S. can independently substantiate a conviction and serve as the sole basis for a guilty verdict. In contrast, Indonesia's evidentiary framework remains governed by the negatief wettelijk principle, which requires at least two valid pieces of evidence supported by the judge’s conviction to establish criminal liability. As a result, DNA evidence in Indonesia is generally considered corroborative rather than conclusive and cannot stand alone in court. This research adopts a normative juridical method, combining statutory analysis and conceptual interpretation to assess the legal treatment of DNA evidence in both jurisdictions. The findings emphasize the urgent need for Indonesia to reform its criminal procedure law to accommodate modern scientific evidence, such as DNA, as primary proof in specific cases. Recommendations include amending provisions in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), enhancing forensic infrastructure, strengthening legal regulations, and improving the capacity of law enforcement personnel. With appropriate procedural safeguards and human rights protections, DNA evidence holds significant potential to be recognized as standalone proof within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. Keywords: DNA evidence, criminal evidence, Forensics
PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM GUGATAN SEDERHANA ANTARA INDONESIA DANGAN MALAYSIA SEBAGAI UPAYA EFEKTIF APABILA TERJADINYA WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN Fandy Gultom; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 Mei (2025): Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal
Publisher : PT Wahana Global Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Melalui PERMA No.14 Tahun 2019, Mahkamah Agung (MA) memperbaharui hukum terkait gugatan sederhana, salah satu isinya merubah total nilai kerugian materi yang bisa diterima pada gugatan sederhana maksimal jadi 500 juta rupiah. Bagi pelaku usaha serta konsumen yang bersengketa perdata umum utamanya pada jalannya perjanjian yang terganggu sebab ada sejumlah pihak yang tidak bisa mencukupi prestasi atau kewajiban kontraktualnya dengan mendalilkan keadaan memaksa (force majeure) menjadi angin segar. Force majeure baik dalam hukum perjanjian Indonesia maupun Malaysia memicu sebuah sengketa kontrak yang berlangsung mesti dinilai sesuai kasus per kasus serta memfokuskan kesesuaiannya dengan beragam aturan yang berlaku. Sehingga gugatan sederhana dapat dilakukan sebagai upaya efektif dikarenakan durasi penuntasan yang cepat serta murah. Gugatan Sederhana di Malaysia di kenal dengan nama “Small Claims Procedure” dijalankan sejak 2012 hingga sekarang, dengan total maksimal kerugian materi yang diterima 5000 RM. Dengan melihat komparasi hukum terkait gugatan sederhana antara Indonesia dan Malaysia maka bakal tampak bahwa gugatan sederhana yang dijalankan di Indonesia lebih baik pada hal total nilai kerugian materi yang bisa diterima serta kecepatan prosesnya. Karenanya, kelebihan tata cara gugatan sederhana ini mesti diberdayakan dengan masif dan berkelanjutan lewat seminar, webminar, talkshow, penulisan artikel, jurnal oleh pemerintah, akademisi, praktisi hukum, pemilik usaha, atau oleh siapapun” agar jadi budaya hukum pilihan utama saat menjalani sengeketa perdata umum dengan kerugian tertentu.
Bekasi City Government Policy In Financing Stunting In Children Hanifa Muslimah, Rifa’at; Subhandi Bakhtiar, Handar
Jurnal KESANS : Kesehatan dan Sains Vol 1 No 2 (2021): KESANS : International Journal of Health and Science
Publisher : Rifa'Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (278.72 KB) | DOI: 10.54543/kesans.v1i2.10

Abstract

Currently, nutritional problems in Indonesia are still in the spotlight, one of which is the problem of stunting in toddlers. The government shows its commitment to tackling stunting by making regulations regarding the acceleration of stunting reduction as stated in Presidential Regulation No. 72 of 2021. The health financing system is an effort to fund the health sector to support the implementation of health with the aim of achieving the highest health status. This study aims to provide an overview of the Bekasi City government's policy in financing stunting prevention in Bekasi City. The research method used is normative juridical, with a statutory approach. The policies issued by the Bekasi City Government regarding the Prevention and Control of Stunting are contained in the Bekasi Mayor's Instruction No: 440/1914/Bappeda and the establishment of the Task Force for the Acceleration of Stunting Prevention and Control is contained in Decree Number: 440/Kep.277-Bappelitbangda/V/ 2020. The results of this study show that the participation of the Bekasi City government has been very good from issuing policies related to stunting reduction efforts, forming and implementing 8 integration actions by involving multi-sectoral roles in government which is an effort to prevent stunting. The financing used in the stunting prevention process is funded by the Bekasi City Government from the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBD) and or other funds that can be utilized by the relevant government sector to be in charge of 8 integration actions.
The Role of Investigative Journalism in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice Reforms: A Legal Analysis Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi
Indonesia Media Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/imrev.v4i1.21852

Abstract

Investigative journalism plays a crucial role in upholding democratic values by exposing legal violations, corruption, and systemic injustices within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. However, various challenges, including political interference, restrictive legislation, and threats to press freedom, hinder its effectiveness. This study aims to analyse the impact of investigative journalism on legal reforms in Indonesia, focusing on its role in uncovering miscarriages of justice, judicial corruption, and human rights violations. Employing a qualitative research approach, this study utilises a case study method to examine high-profile cases. Data collection involves reviewing secondary sources, including investigative reports, legal documents, and media coverage. This study indicate that investigative journalism has significantly contributed to legal reforms by exposing judicial corruption, wrongful convictions, and abuses of power. Key cases such as Sengkon and Karta, Baiq Nuril, Artalyta Suryani, Munir, and Ferdy Sambo illustrate how media exposure generates public pressure, prompting institutional accountability and policy changes. Despite ongoing challenges including legal intimidation, defamation laws, and press freedom constraints investigative journalism remains a critical instrument for democratic oversight and legal transformation. Compared to other jurisdictions, Indonesia’s legal framework remains inadequate in safeguarding journalistic freedom and press independence.
Studi Komparatif Hukum Kepemilikan Tanah Antara Indonesia dan Malaysia Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar; Atik Winanti; Pradipta Prihantono
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i2.725

Abstract

Land Ownership in Indonesia, is regulated in Article 5 of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) No. 5 of 1960. UUPA regulates various types of land rights in Indonesia, such as ownership rights, lease rights, use rights, and business use rights. This regulation aims to distribute natural resources, ensure legal certainty over land, and protect the rights of communities affected by land use policies. Meanwhile, Malaysia has a land ownership legal system influenced by British law due to its colonial period. In this context, land law in Malaysia is regulated by various laws, including the National Land Code (NLC) 1965, which regulates land rights, land registration, and land-related rights. In Malaysia, land is divided into several categories of rights, such as freehold and leasehold. The land registration system in Malaysia is more centralized, and land regulations are also implemented through state institutions. Unlike Indonesia, which prioritizes customary rights in land management, Malaysia tends to prioritize national land regulation and administration through a more modern and structured system.
Manipulation of Legal Regulations in Commodification of Organ Transplants: Indonesia Perspective Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi; Maddussila, Samsu Alam
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): Reforming Legal Frameworks: Justice, Rights, and Innovation in Indonesia and Be
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v9i2.19157

Abstract

Organ transplantation serves as a critical solution for patients in need of organ donors. However, the pressing demand for organs, coupled with donors' economic hardships, has raised concerns about organ transplants being conducted for commercial purposes. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing organ transplantation and explore the practices observed within society. Using secondary data comprising legislation, scholarly articles, scientific research, and online news reports, this study identifies significant inconsistencies and potential ambiguities within the regulatory framework. Current legal provisions stipulate that organ transplants must be conducted solely for humanitarian purposes and explicitly prohibit commercialization. Yet, government regulations create a loophole by allowing donors to receive awards, which could be exploited for commercial gains. To prevent the commercialization of organ transplants, it is essential to ensure that the relationship between donors and recipients is based on familial or kinship ties. Such relationships foster the principles of voluntariness and altruism, which are central to ethically sound transplantation practices. Strengthening the legal framework to eliminate ambiguities and promoting public awareness about ethical transplantation practices are imperative steps to uphold the integrity of organ donation and transplantation. This study underscores the importance of aligning regulatory frameworks with ethical principles to address the challenges posed by commercialization while ensuring equitable access to life-saving organ transplants.
Model Of Punishment: Juvenile Justice Systems Nur, Rafika; Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi; Miqat, Nurul; Darmawati, Darmawati; Mustawa, Mustawa
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 3 SPECIAL ISSUES APRIL 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (665.946 KB) | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v3i0.8313

Abstract

The position of children who have special rights in the law makes children get special treatment. In the juvenile justice system in Indonesia, there are two systems of sanctions, namely criminal sanctions and actions, and this is done to realize the protection of children who are dealing with the law.  This research is a normative juridical review, using a statute, comparative and conceptual approaches. The results show that the imposition of sanctions on children is based on the child's age, where children aged 12 to before 14 years can only be sanctioned with actions, and children aged 14 to before 18 years may be subject to criminal sanctions or actions.
The Principles Of Good Governance In Health Services Marif, Marif; Nurhaedah, Nurhaedah; Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 3 NO. 2 jULY 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (427.798 KB) | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v3i2.7307

Abstract

This study provides an overview of the principles of good governance in health services in Indonesia. This needs to be known considering that health services are a constitutional right for citizens and their services must be carried out as well as possible. Providing health services is a state obligation and getting good and guaranteed health services are the right of citizens. This research is normative-legal research using statute, comparative and conceptual approaches. The results show the principles of good governance in health services that are reflected in the principles of participation, the principles of openness and transparency, the principles of effectiveness and efficiency, and the principles of accountability. Providing health services and covering all health insurance costs for the poor and underprivileged will automatically unconditionally be the responsibility of the government following the mandate of the constitution.
Co-Authors A, Biyandra Timothee Abdul Haris Nafis Abdul Kholiq Abdul Kolib Abidahsari, Irma Achmad, Dirga Adfiyanti Fadjar Adhyarsa, Bayu Aji Adiatma Nugroho Adinda Kusumaning Ratri Aditama Candra Kusuma Afifa, Erina Nur Agung Hermansyah Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Ahmad Fakhrurrazi Mohammed Zabidi Aisyah Nurhalizah Aji Lukman Ibrahim Al Fath Al Fath Alawiyah, Suryani Albert Sintong Limbong Amriyanto Angel Evelin Saragih Sitio Anggita Fitriyani, Jeanny Anni Alvionita Simanjuntak Ariel Lois Atik Winanti Aulyanti, Davina Dewi Ayu Diah Rahmani Azizah Arfah Azwad Rachmat Hambali Bachrong, Faizal Bambang Waluyo Beniharmoni Harefa Cahyaningsih, Rohmah Dwi Cahyasabrina, Ghea Tyagita Christiansen, Nicholas Christloy Totota Karo-Karo Cynthia, Agnes Davina Dewi Daya Nur Pratama Desthabu, Meurina Deviana Cahya Fitri Diah Ayu Wulandari, Diah Ayu Diani Sadiawati Dimas Adityarahman Dina Cynthia Putri Dina Cynthia Putri Dino Rizka Afdhali Dwiastuti, Winda Enina Wika Vetricha Wulandari Erva Yunita Faisal, Adhiya Fakhrurrozi Fakhrurrozi Falevi, Yunizar FANDY GULTOM Farhan Taufiqurahman Febrian Halomoan Febriani, Anggie Feby Welgaputri, Feby x Fil'Awalin, Hanif Geraldine, Mohammad Al Rainer Gilang Bhaswara, Nadhif Grahadi Purna Putra Handina Sulastrina Bakhtiar Handoyo Prasetyo Hanifa Muslimah, Rifa’at Hanna Wijaya Hanna Wijaya Hendra Parulian Heru Suyanto Hijrah Lahaling Hilda Novyana Husen Alting Ibrahim, Kayode Muhammed Ilyas Rahman Imran Imran Indiyarto, Fadhil Muhammad Irwan Triadi Ishma Safira Jeanny Anggita Fitriyani Jimmi Dohar Pandapotan Jodhy Farrel Budiman Kayode Muhammed Ibrahim Khoyron Nasir, Tomi Korompol, Ratu Ratna Kunthi Tridewiyanti Ligina Tesalonika M. Rizki Yudha Prawira Maddussila, Samsu Alam Manga Patila Maniari, Elsa Maria Yohana Marif Marif, Marif Marito, Eugina Evita Maryanto Maryanto Marzuki, Fathur Maulida Fitriani Michelle Angelika S Milda, Nofi Mochammad Ferdinan Adzhani Mohammed Zabidi, Ahmad Fakhrurrazi Muhammad Daffa Ananta Muhammad Fauzan Muhammad fauzan Muhammad Ikbal Muhammad Ikbal Muhammad Naufal, Muhammad Muhammad Nouval Arofah Muhammad Yunus Idy Mustawa, Mustawa Muthia Sakti Nada Prima Dirkareshza Nada Syifa Nurulhuda Naufal Nabiil Ridwansyah Novianti Novianti Nurhaedah Nurhaedah Nurhaedah Nurhayati Mardin Nurul Miqat Parhusip, Alizcia Dora Pradipta Prihantono Prayitno Imam Santosa Purba, Hotmaita Arta Putri Eriana, Nadhifa Rafif Sani Rafif, Aidan Rafika Nur Rafika Nur Raka Haikal Anfasya Rakhbir Singh Rania Adriane Desrina Rania Ratu Ratna Korompot Ratu Wida Widyaningsih Suhandi Respati, Adnasohn Aqilla Ridwanto Igirisa Rio Wirawan Riyanto Riyanto Riyanto Riyanto Rosita Miladmahesi Rosmaida, Erviyanti Safa Mutiara, Ayu Safitri, Nadila Safrin Salam Sahne Fa Alhama Ibrahim Sakti Salma Agustina Salma Agustina Samsu Alam Maddussila Sandra Amelia Sereno Khalfan Barlean Setya Abrilrizky, Haryadian Simamora, Tesalonika Amazia Siregar, Karina Josephine Siswahyudianto Situmeang, Zefanya Angelica Slamet Tri Wahyudi Slamet Tri Wahyudi Sofyan Sauri Sofyan Sauri Suci Maharani, Asari Sulthoni Ajie Sahidin Sunardi Purwanda Suyanto, Heru Syabilal Ali SYAHRUL RAMADHAN, MUHAMMAD Syamsuddin, Adiesty S.P. Syamsuddin, Adiesty Septhiany Prihatiningsih Syamsul Hadi Tarisa Sabrina, Fadiah Tasya Darosyifa Tri Bowo Hersandy Febrianto Tuasalamony, Adzra Ardelia Tulus Mampetua Lumban Gaol Vedita Akbar Vidia Ayu Wulandari Virna Amalia Nur Permata Welgaputri, Feby Witasya Aurelia Sulaeman Yana Sylvana Yohanes Firmansyah Yuliana Yuli Wahyuningsih Yuliana, Adelia Zahra, Lintang Aulia Zain, Abyan Zanubiya, Siti Syafa Az