p-Index From 2021 - 2026
12.314
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Yustisia Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Jurisprudentie PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Unram Law Review Hasanuddin Law Review Jurnal Panorama Hukum TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat DE'RECHTSSTAAT Jambura Law Review Jurnal Yuridis Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Veteran Law Review Jurnal Hukum Positum Pusaka : Jurnal Khazanah Keagamaan Media Iuris Borneo Law Review Journal Jurnal Medika Hutama Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Journal of Judicial Review Amsir Law Jurnal (ALJ) Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) ABDI MOESTOPO: Jurnal Pengabdian pada Masyarakat KESANS : International Journal of Health and Science Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Journal Evidence Of Law Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Kesehatan (JHEK) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Lead Journal of Economy and Administration Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Intellektika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Jurnal KALANDRA Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Journal Social Sciences and Humanioran Review Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research Journal of Law and Legal Reform HUMANIORASAINS Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Referendum International Journal of Law and Society Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum International Journal of Sociology and Law Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum Dan Administrasi Publik International Journal of Social Science and Humanity Pemuliaan Keadilan Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum Statuta Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan IPSSJ Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Abdurrauf Science and Society JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Indonesia Media Law Review International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law HOKI : Journal of Islamic Family Law
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Perbandingan Hukum mengenai Narkotika antara Indonesia dan Malaysia Abdul Haris Nafis; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum dan Administrasi Publik Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum dan Administrasi Publik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/parlementer.v2i2.723

Abstract

The problem of drug abuse is a serious challenge in various countries, including Indonesia and Malaysia. Both countries have strict legal systems in dealing with drug crimes, with an approach that emphasizes the imposition of severe criminal sanctions on perpetrators. This study aims to compare drug law policies between Indonesia and Malaysia, especially in terms of regulation, law enforcement, and the types of criminal sanctions applied. The research method used is normative juridical with a comparative legal approach between countries. The results of the study show that although in general both countries adopt a repressive approach, there are important differences in their legal systems. Malaysia applies a mandatory death penalty for drug dealers in certain amounts, as regulated in the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952. Meanwhile, Indonesia gives judges the authority to determine the type of sanctions, including the death penalty, based on legal considerations and justice in Law No. 35 of 2009. This study is expected to be an evaluation material for policy makers in Indonesia in formulating a drug law system that is not only repressive, but also pays attention to aspects of justice, human rights, and legal effectiveness.
Analisis Perbandingan Kepailitan Harta Peninggalan Antara Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia Albert Sintong Limbong; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum dan Administrasi Publik Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum dan Administrasi Publik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/parlementer.v2i2.724

Abstract

This article discusses the comparative law between Indonesia and Malaysia regarding bankruptcy of inheritance left by a deceased testator. In Indonesia, Bankruptcy of Inheritance and Responsibility of Heirs Based on the "Burgerlijk Wetboek", with 2 (two) main issues, namely bankruptcy petitions based on debts from the testator and the responsibility of heirs who have received inheritances from deceased debtors. The main focus of this discussion is how each country regulates the possibility of inheritance being declared bankrupt, as well as the position of the heirs in the bankruptcy process. The method used in this study is normative juridical with a comparative law approach. The results of the analysis show that although Indonesia and Malaysia have similar legal system roots (civil law influenced by the Netherlands and England), there are differences in principle in the treatment of bankruptcy of inheritance. Indonesia allows bankrupt inheritance assets to be subject to bankruptcy under certain conditions, while Malaysia emphasizes the inheritance administration process without a formal bankruptcy approach. This study is important to provide an understanding for legal practitioners in dealing with inheritance dispute cases burdened with debt.
Pretrial Proceedings in Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law: Its Relation to Corruption Eradication Adiatma Nugroho; Beniharmoni Harefa; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
International Journal of Social Science and Humanity Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Social Science and Humanity
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijss.v2i2.375

Abstract

Pretrial proceedings play a strategic role in Indonesia's criminal justice system as a judicial oversight mechanism to ensure the legality of law enforcement actions and the protection of suspects’ human rights. In corruption cases, however, pretrial motions are often exploited as procedural loopholes to invalidate ongoing investigations due to the absence of rigid legal standards and inconsistent interpretations by judges sometimes extending into the merits of the case, which should fall outside the scope of pretrial jurisdiction. This study examines the ideal concept of pretrial review using a normative juridical approach, emphasizing the due process of law principle, the primacy of lex specialis under Article 26A of the Anti-Corruption Law, and its harmonization with the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The research concludes that pretrial mechanisms should function solely as limited judicial review, restricted to evaluating procedural legality. Additionally, the study highlights the significance of establishing Preliminary Examination Judges (Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan) as proposed in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code. These judges would proactively supervise investigative actions, ensuring procedural compliance and minimizing the misuse of pretrial remedies by corruption suspects. Strengthening normative frameworks and judicial guidelines is thus essential to foster coherent, fair rulings and support the integrity and effectiveness of anti-corruption law enforcement.
Analisis Perbandingan Standar Pembuktian Pidana Indonesia-Amerika Serikat: Studi Alat Bukti DNA sebagai Bukti Tunggal Mochammad Ferdinan Adzhani; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2025): Volume 12 Nomor 1 Juni 2025
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v12i1.57059

Abstract

This study examines the legal standing of DNA evidence as a sole means of proof within the criminal justice systems of Indonesia and the United States. DNA, known for its scientific reliability and high accuracy in identifying perpetrators, has received substantial recognition in the United States. Under the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard, DNA evidence in the U.S. can independently substantiate a conviction and serve as the sole basis for a guilty verdict. In contrast, Indonesia's evidentiary framework remains governed by the negatief wettelijk principle, which requires at least two valid pieces of evidence supported by the judge’s conviction to establish criminal liability. As a result, DNA evidence in Indonesia is generally considered corroborative rather than conclusive and cannot stand alone in court. This research adopts a normative juridical method, combining statutory analysis and conceptual interpretation to assess the legal treatment of DNA evidence in both jurisdictions. The findings emphasize the urgent need for Indonesia to reform its criminal procedure law to accommodate modern scientific evidence, such as DNA, as primary proof in specific cases. Recommendations include amending provisions in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), enhancing forensic infrastructure, strengthening legal regulations, and improving the capacity of law enforcement personnel. With appropriate procedural safeguards and human rights protections, DNA evidence holds significant potential to be recognized as standalone proof within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. Keywords: DNA evidence, criminal evidence, Forensics
Legal Reform in Indonesia’s Natural Resource Exploitation: A Study of SOE Privatization and Corporate Responsibility Suherman, Suherman; Joesoef, Iwan Erar; Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi; Kholiq, Abdul; Phuoc, Jeong Chun
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): July, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i3.20064

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the exploitation of natural resources by State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), particularly in forest management and mining, which do not contribute to the prosperity of the people. The scope of this research focuses on SOEs that control vital natural resources affecting the livelihoods of many people. This research employs a normative juridical method with a historical approach to privatization and an analysis of John Ruggie’s principles regarding Government and Private Responsibility for Human Rights (“Protect, Respect and Remedies”), as well as collecting data as library research.  The findings indicate that such exploitation is carried out by SOEs (with share-persero) as a result of the privatization in the 1980s and 1990s, leading to liberalization. The study of John Ruggie’s principles highlights the obligation of both the State and SOEs to prevent the exploitation of natural resources. The study concludes that the SOE engaged in resource management operate as “persero” entities, with shares partially owned by the private sector, leading to unfair business competition. Article 33 (2) and (3) of the Constitution mandates that natural resource management should be carried out by SOEs of which ownership is 100% by the State (“perum”) or through Cooperatives, as stipulated in Article 33 of the Constitution. The authors have proposed the liberalization results in the of SOEs (Persero), enabling private management, which raises concerns over monopolistic practices, unfair competition, and rationally impacts the potential of natural resources based on privatization and liberalization factors.
PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM GUGATAN SEDERHANA ANTARA INDONESIA DANGAN MALAYSIA SEBAGAI UPAYA EFEKTIF APABILA TERJADINYA WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN Fandy Gultom; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 Mei (2025): Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal
Publisher : PT Wahana Global Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Melalui PERMA No.14 Tahun 2019, Mahkamah Agung (MA) memperbaharui hukum terkait gugatan sederhana, salah satu isinya merubah total nilai kerugian materi yang bisa diterima pada gugatan sederhana maksimal jadi 500 juta rupiah. Bagi pelaku usaha serta konsumen yang bersengketa perdata umum utamanya pada jalannya perjanjian yang terganggu sebab ada sejumlah pihak yang tidak bisa mencukupi prestasi atau kewajiban kontraktualnya dengan mendalilkan keadaan memaksa (force majeure) menjadi angin segar. Force majeure baik dalam hukum perjanjian Indonesia maupun Malaysia memicu sebuah sengketa kontrak yang berlangsung mesti dinilai sesuai kasus per kasus serta memfokuskan kesesuaiannya dengan beragam aturan yang berlaku. Sehingga gugatan sederhana dapat dilakukan sebagai upaya efektif dikarenakan durasi penuntasan yang cepat serta murah. Gugatan Sederhana di Malaysia di kenal dengan nama “Small Claims Procedure” dijalankan sejak 2012 hingga sekarang, dengan total maksimal kerugian materi yang diterima 5000 RM. Dengan melihat komparasi hukum terkait gugatan sederhana antara Indonesia dan Malaysia maka bakal tampak bahwa gugatan sederhana yang dijalankan di Indonesia lebih baik pada hal total nilai kerugian materi yang bisa diterima serta kecepatan prosesnya. Karenanya, kelebihan tata cara gugatan sederhana ini mesti diberdayakan dengan masif dan berkelanjutan lewat seminar, webminar, talkshow, penulisan artikel, jurnal oleh pemerintah, akademisi, praktisi hukum, pemilik usaha, atau oleh siapapun” agar jadi budaya hukum pilihan utama saat menjalani sengeketa perdata umum dengan kerugian tertentu.
Bekasi City Government Policy In Financing Stunting In Children Hanifa Muslimah, Rifa’at; Subhandi Bakhtiar, Handar
Jurnal KESANS : Kesehatan dan Sains Vol 1 No 2 (2021): KESANS : International Journal of Health and Science
Publisher : Rifa'Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (278.72 KB) | DOI: 10.54543/kesans.v1i2.10

Abstract

Currently, nutritional problems in Indonesia are still in the spotlight, one of which is the problem of stunting in toddlers. The government shows its commitment to tackling stunting by making regulations regarding the acceleration of stunting reduction as stated in Presidential Regulation No. 72 of 2021. The health financing system is an effort to fund the health sector to support the implementation of health with the aim of achieving the highest health status. This study aims to provide an overview of the Bekasi City government's policy in financing stunting prevention in Bekasi City. The research method used is normative juridical, with a statutory approach. The policies issued by the Bekasi City Government regarding the Prevention and Control of Stunting are contained in the Bekasi Mayor's Instruction No: 440/1914/Bappeda and the establishment of the Task Force for the Acceleration of Stunting Prevention and Control is contained in Decree Number: 440/Kep.277-Bappelitbangda/V/ 2020. The results of this study show that the participation of the Bekasi City government has been very good from issuing policies related to stunting reduction efforts, forming and implementing 8 integration actions by involving multi-sectoral roles in government which is an effort to prevent stunting. The financing used in the stunting prevention process is funded by the Bekasi City Government from the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBD) and or other funds that can be utilized by the relevant government sector to be in charge of 8 integration actions.
The Role of Investigative Journalism in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice Reforms: A Legal Analysis Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi
Indonesia Media Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/imrev.v4i1.21852

Abstract

Investigative journalism plays a crucial role in upholding democratic values by exposing legal violations, corruption, and systemic injustices within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. However, various challenges, including political interference, restrictive legislation, and threats to press freedom, hinder its effectiveness. This study aims to analyse the impact of investigative journalism on legal reforms in Indonesia, focusing on its role in uncovering miscarriages of justice, judicial corruption, and human rights violations. Employing a qualitative research approach, this study utilises a case study method to examine high-profile cases. Data collection involves reviewing secondary sources, including investigative reports, legal documents, and media coverage. This study indicate that investigative journalism has significantly contributed to legal reforms by exposing judicial corruption, wrongful convictions, and abuses of power. Key cases such as Sengkon and Karta, Baiq Nuril, Artalyta Suryani, Munir, and Ferdy Sambo illustrate how media exposure generates public pressure, prompting institutional accountability and policy changes. Despite ongoing challenges including legal intimidation, defamation laws, and press freedom constraints investigative journalism remains a critical instrument for democratic oversight and legal transformation. Compared to other jurisdictions, Indonesia’s legal framework remains inadequate in safeguarding journalistic freedom and press independence.
Peningkatan Pemahaman Bela Negara Untuk Mencapai Perdamaian, Keadilan, dan Kelembagaan yang Kuat dengan Metode Role Play Wahyudi, Slamet Tri; Waluyo, Bambang; Agustanti, Rosalia Dika; Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi; Hadi, Syamsul; Arofah, Muhammad Nouval; Ananta, Muhammad Daffa; Budiman, Jodhy Farrel; Adityarahman, Dimas; Wulandari, Vidia Ayu; Barlean, Sereno Khalfan
Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November 2025 - Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59395/altifani.v5i6.933

Abstract

Sikap bela negara itu sendiri merupakan kekuatan Negara Indonesia bagi proses pembangunan nasional menuju tujuan nasional dan merupakan kondisi yang harus diwujudkan agar proses pencapaian tujuan nasional tersebut dapat berjalan dengan sukses. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan suatu konsepsi ketahanan nasional yang sesuai dengan karakteristik bangsa Indonesia. Dengan adanya kesadaran akan Bela Negara, kita harus dapat memiliki sikap dan prilaku yang sesuai kejuangan, cinta tanah air serta rela berkorban bagi nusa dan bangsa. Dalam kaitannya dengan pemuda penerus bangsa sangat penting ditanamkan sikap cinta tanah air sejak dini sehingga kecintaan mereka terhadap bangsa dan negara lebih meyakini dan lebih dalam. Sumber daya manusia menjadi titik sentral potensi bangsa yang berperan melaksanakan pembangunan dan mengatasi segala bentuk ancaman, baik dari dalam ataupun dari luar negeri. Pertengkaran antar pelajar menjadi perhatian utama dalam lingkungan pendidikan di berbagai negara. Oleh sebab itu, Adapun kegiatan yang akan dilaksanakan antara lain penguatan Bela Negara; sosialisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Pidana; dan pelaksanaan model pembelajaran Role Play. Kegiatan penguatan bela negara yang dilaksanakan di tingkat SMA terbukti berhasil mencapai tujuan yang ditetapkan, ditandai dengan meningkatnya pemahaman dan kesadaran siswa terhadap pentingnya peran mereka dalam menjaga keutuhan bangsa. Kegiatan ini juga mendapat respons positif dari para peserta, guru, dan pihak sekolah, yang menilai bahwa materi serta metode yang digunakan mampu membangkitkan semangat nasionalisme dan tanggung jawab sebagai warga negara.
CROSS-BORDER PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL: SUATU STUDI PERBANDINGAN NEGARA Fattah, Akhmad Kautsar; Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi
Jurnal Humaniora dan Sosial Sains Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Pojok Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study addresses the issue of cross-border property ownership from the perspective of international law, with a focus on comparing Indonesia with several other countries. The main objective of this research is to examine how international law accommodates property ownership by foreign nationals and the mechanisms available for resolving disputes arising from it. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, analytical, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that regulations concerning property ownership by foreign nationals largely depend on the national sovereignty of each country. Indonesia, for example, through the principle of nationality under the Agrarian Law (UUPA), restricts property ownership exclusively to Indonesian citizens, with limited exceptions in the form of usage rights (hak pakai). However, in practice, legal loopholes exist through nominee schemes and foreign investment mechanisms such as the establishment of foreign-owned companies (PT PMA). Meanwhile, countries like Singapore and Japan adopt more open approaches toward foreign property ownership. In terms of dispute resolution, international law provides access to international arbitration forums such as ICSID, which serve as alternatives for foreign investors seeking fair and neutral legal protection. Therefore, while international law does not directly regulate the substance of property ownership, it plays a crucial role in shaping the framework for investment protection and cross-border property dispute resolution.
Co-Authors A, Biyandra Timothee Abdul Haris Nafis Abdul Kholiq Abdul Kholiq Abdul Kolib Abidahsari, Irma Achmad, Dirga Adfiyanti Fadjar Adhyarsa, Bayu Aji Adiatma Nugroho Adiesty S.P. Syamsuddin Adinda Kusumaning Ratri Aditama Candra Kusuma Adityarahman, Dimas Afifa, Erina Nur Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Aisyah Nurhalizah Aji Lukman Ibrahim Al Fath Al Fath Alawiyah, Suryani Albert Sintong Limbong Amriyanto Ananta, Muhammad Daffa Angel Evelin Saragih Sitio Anggita Fitriyani, Jeanny Anni Alvionita Simanjuntak Ariel Lois Arofah, Muhammad Nouval Atik Winanti Aulyanti, Davina Dewi Ayu Diah Rahmani Azizah Arfah Bachrong, Faizal Bakhtiar, Handina Sulastrina Bambang Waluyo Barlean, Sereno Khalfan Beniharmoni Harefa Budiman, Jodhy Farrel Cahyaningsih, Rohmah Dwi Cahyasabrina, Ghea Tyagita Christiansen, Nicholas Christloy Totota Karo-Karo Cynthia, Agnes Darmawati Darmawati Davina Dewi Daya Nur Pratama Desthabu, Meurina Deviana Cahya Fitri Diah Ayu Wulandari, Diah Ayu Diani Sadiawati Dwiastuti, Winda Enina Wika Vetricha Wulandari Erlyani, Rizka Erva Yunita Faisal, Adhiya Fakhrurrozi Fakhrurrozi Falevi, Yunizar FANDY GULTOM Fattah, Akhmad Kautsar Febriani, Anggie Feby Welgaputri, Feby x Fil'Awalin, Hanif Geraldine, Mohammad Al Rainer Gilang Bhaswara, Nadhif Grahadi Purna Putra Halomoan, Febrian Hambali , Azwad Rachmat Handoyo Prasetyo Hanifa Muslimah, Rifa’at Hanna Wijaya Hanna Wijaya Hendra Parulian Heru Suyanto Hijrah Lahaling Hilda Novyana Husen Alting Ibrahim, Kayode Muhammed Igirisa, Ridwanto Ilyas Rahman Imran Imran Indiyarto, Fadhil Muhammad Irwan Triadi Ishma Safira Iwan Erar Joesoef Jeanny Anggita Fitriyani Jimmi Dohar Pandapotan Kayode Muhammed Ibrahim Khoyron Nasir, Tomi Kunthi Tridewiyanti Ligina Tesalonika M. Rizki Yudha Prawira Maddussila, Samsu Alam Manga Patila Maniari, Elsa Maria Yohana Marif Marif, Marif Marito, Eugina Evita Maryanto Maryanto Marzuki, Fathur Maulida Fitriani Michelle Angelika S Milda, Nofi Mochammad Ferdinan Adzhani Mohammad Ikbal Borman Mohammed Zabidi, Ahmad Fakhrurrazi Muhammad Fauzan Muhammad fauzan Muhammad Ikbal Muhammad Naufal, Muhammad Muhammad Yunus Idy Mustawa, Mustawa Muthia Sakti Nada Prima Dirkareshza Nada Syifa Nurulhuda Naufal Nabiil Ridwansyah Novianti Novianti Nurhaedah Nurhaedah Nurhaedah Nurhayati Mardin Nurul Miqat Parhusip, Alizcia Dora Phuoc, Jeong Chun Pradipta Prihantono Prayitno Imam Santosa Purba, Hotmaita Arta Putri Eriana, Nadhifa Rafif Sani Rafif, Aidan Rafika Nur Raka Haikal Anfasya Rakhbir Singh Ratu Ratna Korompot Respati, Adnasohn Aqilla Rio Wirawan Riyanto Riyanto Riyanto Riyanto Rosita Miladmahesi Rosmaida, Erviyanti Safa Mutiara, Ayu Safitri, Nadila Safrin Salam Salma Agustina Salma Agustina Samsu Alam Maddussila Sandra Amelia Senajaya, Sacvio Fath Setya Abrilrizky, Haryadian Simamora, Tesalonika Amazia Siregar, Karina Josephine Siswahyudianto Situmeang, Zefanya Angelica Slamet Tri Wahyudi Sofyan Sauri Suci Maharani, Asari Suherman, Suherman Sulthoni Ajie Sahidin Sunardi Purwanda Suyanto, Heru Syabilal Ali SYAHRUL RAMADHAN, MUHAMMAD Syamsuddin, Adiesty Septhiany Prihatiningsih Syamsul Hadi Tarisa Sabrina, Fadiah Tasya Darosyifa Tri Bowo Hersandy Febrianto Tuasalamony, Adzra Ardelia Tulus Mampetua Lumban Gaol Vedita Akbar Virna Amalia Nur Permata Welgaputri, Feby Witasya Aurelia Sulaeman Wulandari, Vidia Ayu Yana Sylvana Yohanes Firmansyah Yuliana Yuli Wahyuningsih Yuliana, Adelia Zabidi, Ahmad Fakhrurrazi Mohammed Zahra, Lintang Aulia Zain, Abyan Zanubiya, Siti Syafa Az