Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
24.332
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Semaya Jurnal Daulat Hukum NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI WAJAH HUKUM Unes Law Review Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli AL-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Academia Open Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Jurnal Yustitia Action Research Literate (ARL) Law Development Journal International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Journal of Social Research Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Journal of Accounting Management Business and International Research Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Sighat : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Journal of Mutidisciplinary Issues Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Journal of Law, Education and Business International Journal of Application on Economics and Business Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary Journal of Management Accounting, Tax and Production Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Abdi Masyarakat UIKA Journal of Innovative and Creativity Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology SAKOLA: Journal of Sains Cooperative Learning and Law Journal of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Jurnal Akuntansi Hukum dan Edukasi Jurnal Sostekmas: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Teknologi, dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Journal of Business Inflation Management and Accounting Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities Jurnal Serina Abdimas
Lie, Gunardi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 214 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 214 Documents
Search

 18   19   20   21   22 
The Business Judgment Rule in the Context of Directors’ Liability: A Comparative Study of the United States, Canada, and Indonesia: Business Judgment Rule dalam Perspektif Pertanggungjawaban Direksi: Studi Perbandingan Amerika Serikat, Kanada, dan Indonesia Sanyoto, Alicia Andromeda; Lie, Gunardi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1387

Abstract

General background: Directors hold a strategic role in corporate governance, yet not all business decisions generate profits, exposing them to potential personal liability. Specific background: Differentiating reasonable business risks from negligence or bad faith remains a legal challenge across jurisdictions. Knowledge gap: Although the Business Judgment Rule, BJR, aims to protect directors who act prudently, in good faith, and based on adequate information, its formulation and judicial application differ significantly in the United States, Canada, and Indonesia, with Indonesia showing limited and inconsistent enforcement. Aims: This study analyzes the regulation and implementation of BJR in the three jurisdictions to evaluate how each balances managerial discretion and legal accountability. Results: The United States applies BJR as a strong presumption safeguarding informed and loyal decisions, Canada emphasizes judicial restraint based on the fairness of the decision-making process, and Indonesia codifies BJR principles but lacks clear evaluative standards in practice. Novelty: The study provides a comparative understanding of doctrinal and structural differences that shape the scope of director protection. Implications: Strengthening BJR interpretation and judicial guidelines in Indonesia is crucial to prevent hindsight bias, support responsible risk-taking, and enhance legal certainty in corporate governance. Highlights: The Business Judgment Rule protects directors who act in good faith, prudently, and with adequate information. The United States and Canada apply BJR through strong judicial restraint, while Indonesia’s application remains limited. Clearer BJR standards in Indonesia are essential to reduce hindsight bias and strengthen corporate governance. Keywords: Business Judgment Rule, Directors’ Liability, Comparative Corporate Law, Fiduciary Duty, Legal Accountability.
China’s Technological Self-Reliance Strategy in Responding to Western Corporate Monopoly and Dominance in the Technology Sector: A Legal Review of Competition Law across Various Legal Instruments: Strategi Kemandirian Teknologi Tiongkok dalam Menghadapi Monopoli dan Dominasi Korporasi Barat di Bidang Teknologi: Suatu Tinjauan Hukum Persaingan Usaha dalam Berbagai Produk Hukum Putra, Louis Sebastian Anot; Lie, Gunardi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1388

Abstract

Background (General): Western technological dominance has shaped global markets and innovation trajectories, creating structural imbalances in competition. Background (Specific): China faces this asymmetry with the rise of U.S. legal, economic, and technological pressures, particularly during escalating trade conflicts. Knowledge Gap: While many studies address industrial policy or competition law separately, limited scholarship integrates how China’s legal framework functions simultaneously as market regulation and geopolitical strategy. Aim: This study examines China’s technological self-reliance strategy by evaluating the role of the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) alongside major industrial policies in countering Western corporate hegemony. Results: Findings demonstrate that China employs AML with dual functionality—disciplining domestic giants such as Alibaba while fortifying national sovereignty against foreign corporate influence—and aligns this with three major initiatives: Made in China 2025, Dual Circulation Strategy, and China Standards 2035 to strengthen manufacturing capability, market independence, and global standard-setting authority. Novelty: Unlike traditional market-driven antitrust systems, China adopts state-oriented “antitrust mercantilism,” integrating competition law with industrial modernization and geopolitical objectives. Implications: The study indicates a shift in global competition norms, where national legal instruments increasingly function not only to balance market fairness but also to challenge structural dominance and redistribute global technological power. Highlights: China integrates antitrust law with industrial policy to strengthen technological independence. The strategy responds directly to Western corporate and geopolitical dominance in global technology. Policies such as MIC 2025, DCS, and China Standards 2035 reinforce sovereignty and global competitiveness. Keywords: Technological Self-Reliance, Anti-Monopoly Law, Industrial Policy, Western Dominance, China Strategy
Regulatory Disharmony of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) between State-Owned and Private Enterprises and Its Implications for Sustainable Development Indicators in Indonesia: Disharmoni Pengaturan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) antara Badan Usaha Milik Negara dan Perusahaan Swasta serta Implikasinya terhadap Tolok Ukur Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia Andriani, Kasmita; Lie, Gunardi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1389

Abstract

General Background: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Indonesia has transitioned toward the Triple Bottom Line, positioning CSR as a key driver of sustainable development. Specific Background: However, its implementation exhibits regulatory differences between State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and private companies, creating inconsistencies in legal obligations and funding mechanisms. Knowledge Gap: Existing CSR regulations emphasize formal compliance rather than measurable, sustainable impact, and little research examines how regulatory disharmony affects effectiveness. Aims: This study analyzes the juridical implications of regulatory disparities and evaluates CSR success benchmarks in relation to sustainable development principles. Results: Findings reveal two major implications: (1) discriminatory treatment, as CSR is mandatory for non–natural resource SOEs but voluntary for similar private firms, contradicting equality before the law; and (2) legal uncertainty due to conflicting norms on CSR funding sources. Additionally, a substantive gap appears between legal requirements and sustainability-oriented effectiveness indicators. Novelty: The study integrates legal analysis with sustainable development metrics, highlighting the need to shift CSR evaluation from compliance-based to impact-based frameworks. Implications: Harmonizing CSR regulation and adopting outcome-oriented benchmarks are essential to strengthen CSR’s contribution to Indonesia’s sustainable development agendas. Highlights: Regulatory inconsistencies create unequal CSR obligations between SOEs and private firms. Conflicting norms on funding sources generate legal uncertainty in CSR implementation. Effective CSR requires shifting from compliance-based evaluation to impact-based benchmarks. Keywords: CSR, Regulatory Disharmony, State-Owned Enterprises, Sustainable Development, Legal Uncertainty
The Employer’s Legal Obligations Toward Workers’ Rights Arising from Termination of Employment (A Comparative Study between Indonesia and Germany): Kewajiban Hukum Pengusaha Terhadap Hak Pekerja Akibat Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (Studi Komparatif Indonesia dan Jerman) Sitorus, Lena Mariana Br; Lie, Gunardi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1399

Abstract

General Background: Termination of employment remains a critical issue in labor law due to its social, economic, and legal consequences for workers. Specific Background: In Indonesia, despite comprehensive regulation under the Manpower Law and Job Creation Law, unilateral termination continues to occur, often without due process or fulfillment of workers’ entitlements, as illustrated in the case of PT X. Knowledge Gap: However, comparative studies examining the adequacy of Indonesian protections in relation to countries with stronger welfare-oriented systems, such as Germany, remain limited. Aims: This study aims to analyze the legal obligations of employers regarding workers’ rights arising from unilateral termination and to compare regulatory frameworks between Indonesia and Germany. Results: Findings show that Indonesia provides normative protection but faces weak enforcement, inconsistent application of compensation rules, and limited procedural safeguards, whereas Germany—through the Kündigungsschutzgesetz—implements stricter termination requirements, mandatory works-council consultation, and comprehensive social security support. Novelty: This study offers a detailed doctrinal and case-based comparison highlighting structural gaps in Indonesian law using a welfare-state benchmark. Implications: Strengthening enforcement mechanisms, enhancing oversight, and integrating social security-based protections could significantly improve Indonesia’s system for safeguarding workers against unjust termination. Highlights: Highlights the gap between normative regulation and practical enforcement in Indonesia. Emphasizes Germany’s stronger procedural and welfare-based safeguards for workers. Identifies the need for Indonesia to strengthen legal implementation and social protection mechanisms. Keywords: Termination of Employment, Legal Protection, Workers’ Rights, Labor Law
Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) Musisi di Industri Musik Indonesia: Studi Yuridis Terhadap Tantangan Penegakan Hak Cipta dan Distribusi Royalti di Era Digital Mousavian, Farel Sya'ban; Lie, Gunardi
SIGHAT: JURNAL HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAH Vol 4 No 1 (2025): SIGHAT: JURNAL HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAH
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/shighat_hes.v4i1.15090

Abstract

This study examines the protection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) for musicians in Indonesia’s music industry, focusing on the challenges of copyright enforcement and royalty distribution in the digital era. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, supported by library research. The findings reveal that copyright enforcement faces significant obstacles, including rampant digital piracy, limited law enforcement capacity, weak institutional coordination, and low public awareness of copyright compliance. Meanwhile, royalty distribution mechanisms remain ineffective due to lack of transparency, delayed payments, and the complex flow of digital revenues involving multiple stakeholders. These shortcomings undermine the effectiveness of IPR protection for musicians. Therefore, strategic measures are required, such as strengthening law enforcement capacity, enhancing the transparency and accountability of collective management organizations, and utilizing digital technologies such as fingerprinting, blockchain, and smart contracts. Synergy between law enforcement, royalty distribution governance, and technological innovation is essential to build a fair, transparent, and sustainable music ecosystem in Indonesia. Keywords: Intellectual Property Rights, copyright, royalty distribution, music industry, digital era
The Efforts in Law Enforcement for Personal Data Protection Lumban Raja, Muhammad Dewo; Lie, Gunardi
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.48856

Abstract

The concept of the rule of law is crucial for the proper functioning of any state, ensuring that governance operates within the framework of legal regulations. This principle, outlined in Hans Nawiasky’s Theory of Legal Norm Hierarchy, prevents the abuse of power and guarantees that authority is exercised under legal oversight. Key features of the rule of law, such as legal certainty, equality before the law, and human rights protection, contribute to the creation of a just society. In the context of Indonesia, which is a constitutional state as per Article 1(3) of the 1945 Constitution, legal provisions such as the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP) are introduced to protect citizens' personal data, particularly within the rapidly growing digital financial services sector. Indonesia’s advancement into Industry 4.0 and the rise of financial technology (FinTech) have made data protection more urgent, especially in a digital economy where data sharing occurs across borders. The government’s legal response includes laws and regulatory frameworks that aim to safeguard users’ personal data while addressing challenges like low digital literacy, weak compliance, and cross-border data flows. This paper explores the implementation of these laws, examines the challenges in enforcing them, and proposes improvements for ensuring effective protection of personal data in Indonesia’s digital financial services.
Itikad Tidak Baik dalam Pendaftaran Merek terhadap Merek Terkenal di Indonesia Dewi, Kumala; Lie, Gunardi
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Oktober, Social Issues and Problems in Society
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.50923

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji persoalan itikad tidak baik dalam pendaftaran merek terhadap merek terkenal di Indonesia, dengan menitikberatkan pada efektivitas perlindungan hukum yang diberikan oleh sistem hukum nasional. Fenomena pendaftaran merek oleh pihak yang tidak berhak, atau dikenal sebagai bad faith registration, telah menjadi salah satu bentuk pelanggaran yang kerap menimbulkan sengketa dalam praktik kekayaan intelektual. Meskipun Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis telah mengatur mekanisme perlindungan bagi pemilik merek terkenal, implementasi prinsip itikad baik dalam proses pendaftaran masih menghadapi sejumlah kendala, baik dari segi pembuktian niat tidak baik maupun konsistensi penerapan oleh otoritas administratif dan peradilan. Melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif, penelitian ini menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin para ahli, serta putusan pengadilan yang relevan untuk menilai sejauh mana prinsip good faith dijalankan dalam sistem first to file yang dianut Indonesia. Analisis dilakukan secara deduktif dan kualitatif dengan menyoroti hubungan antara prinsip moralitas hukum dan kepastian hukum dalam pendaftaran merek. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa prinsip itikad baik tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai norma etis, tetapi juga sebagai dasar hukum yang menentukan keabsahan suatu pendaftaran. Pendaftaran merek yang dilakukan dengan niat menjiplak, meniru, atau membonceng reputasi merek terkenal harus dianggap sebagai pelanggaran terhadap asas kejujuran dan persaingan usaha yang sehat. Oleh karena itu, tindakan administratif berupa penolakan pendaftaran oleh Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual serta upaya hukum berupa pembatalan melalui Pengadilan Niaga merupakan bentuk konkrit perlindungan hukum represif bagi pemilik merek terkenal.
Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Pembatalan Putusan BPSK: Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung 553/K-Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2025 Angela, Silvia; Lie, Gunardi
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Oktober, Social Issues and Problems in Society
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.50792

Abstract

This study examines the procedural irregularities that led to the annulment of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) decision in the Supreme Court Judgment No. 553/K-Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2025. The research was motivated by the increasing number of consumer disputes in digital transactions and the recurring inconsistency in BPSK decisions, particularly regarding violations of procedural fairness. Using a normative legal research method, the analysis draws upon statutory regulations, court decisions, and legal doctrine to assess whether the dispute resolution process conducted by BPSK aligned with the principles of consumer protection law. The findings reveal that BPSK failed to comply with essential procedural standards, including improper summons to the business actor, the absence of valid consent for arbitration, and reliance on outdated legal provisions. These errors resulted in the violation of due process and the principle of audi et alteram partem, ultimately undermining the legitimacy of BPSKs decision. The study further demonstrates that such procedural defects harm both consumers and business actors, weaken legal certainty, and diminish the credibility of BPSK as an alternative dispute resolution institution. The research concludes that strengthening procedural compliance, ensuring consistent application of legal norms, and enhancing institutional competence are crucial for improving the effectiveness of consumer dispute resolution and safeguarding public trust in BPSK
Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Asuransi di BPSK: Analisis Perlindungan Hukum dan Kepastian Penerapan Putusan Yunita, Theresia; Lie, Gunardi
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Oktober, Social Issues and Problems in Society
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.50777

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas efektivitas Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen dalam menangani sengketa antara konsumen dan perusahaan asuransi yang kerap muncul akibat penolakan klaim, ketidakseimbangan informasi, serta penggunaan klausula baku yang merugikan konsumen. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan mengumpulkan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier melalui kajian peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur ilmiah, dan pendapat ahli, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif melalui penafsiran norma dan pengkajian sistematis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keberadaan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen belum sepenuhnya efektif karena adanya tumpang tindih kewenangan dengan lembaga lain, keterbatasan kemampuan teknis dalam menilai dokumen polis, variasi kualitas putusan antar daerah, serta lemahnya mekanisme pelaksanaan putusan sehingga banyak putusan tidak dijalankan oleh pelaku usaha. Selain itu, rendahnya pemahaman konsumen mengenai isi polis memperkuat posisi dominan perusahaan asuransi dan memperbesar potensi terjadinya sengketa. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa melalui Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen perlu diperkuat melalui harmonisasi regulasi, peningkatan kapasitas kelembagaan, dan penataan mekanisme pelaksanaan putusan agar perlindungan yang sederhana, cepat, dan terjangkau bagi konsumen dapat diwujudkan secara lebih konsisten.
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Disruption on Industrial Relations Stability in the Media Sector Alam, Jenice Valencia; Lie, Gunardi
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Oktober, Social Issues and Problems in Society
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.50524

Abstract

The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has created a profound transformation in global labor structures, particularly within the media industry. Automation and AI-driven algorithms have begun to replace numerous human functions, from content production to digital editorial management. This phenomenon raises normative legal issues within Indonesias labor framework, as the increasing number of employment terminations (PHK) is no longer primarily caused by economic loss, but by efficiency decisions driven by technological modernization. Existing regulations, such as Law No. 13 of 2003 on Manpower and Government Regulation No. 35 of 2021, have yet to provide an adequate legal foundation to address this emerging reality. This study employs a normative juridical legal research method, focusing on the examination of positive legal norms, legal principles, and relevant labor law doctrines. The study finds that Indonesias labor law system remains reactive and unprepared to anticipate structural changes resulting from the integration of AI in the workplace. Legal protections for workers affected by automation-induced termination are not yet comprehensively accommodated within existing regulations. The research emphasizes the need for a more adaptive and progressive reformulation of labor law, positioning reskilling and upskilling policies as preventive legal mechanisms. Such legal renewal is essential to maintain a balance between industrial efficiency and the protection of workers rights amid the ongoing artificial intelligence revolution
Co-Authors Adepio, Muhammad Fadel Ahmad Sudiro Ainun Jariyah, Sarifah Aisha, Salma Akhirudin Alam, Jenice Valencia Alfiani, Feriza Alya, Nasha Rawza Andrian Andrian Andriani, Kasmita Angela, Silvia Angelia Angelina, Made Aubrey Josephine Anggra, Philip Anindira, Lydia Anwar Rannu, Delycia Aprilia Fong, Fanesa Aprilia, Indah Siti Aprillianty, Kesia Apriza, Nathania ARI WAHYUDI Aritonang, Sanrio Art, Stanley Muljadi Augustin, Agatha Avianti, Grace Az-Zahra, Aiska Rahima Belle, Grace Anna Bianty, Thisia Bonang, Rio C, Gabriella Cahyono, Denzel Andersson Candra, Dimas Carnescia, Brenda Cendranita, Ivannia Chandra, Jessica Chen, Zefanya Angellin Christian, Benedict Philip Christine Octavia S Dameria, Fiorella Angella Darmansyah, Erick Diana Diana Egatri Gulo, Feby EVELYN EVELYN Febriany, Febriany Fernandha, Rizqy Dini Fernando, Wilson Furguson, Felix Goldwen, Filshella Gunawan, Syahrana Kezia Anjunien Hafendi, Doni Halim, Leonardo Hamonangan, Marcellius Kirana Hapsari, Crescentia Viola Priscilla Audra Hartono, Evelyn Hartono, Margareta Kristiani Harum, Vanessa Mathilde Haykel, Muhammad Hermanto, Dennis Ichsandi, Muhammad Wildan Jemiel Heng, Richard Jolin, Jolin Jonatan, Frangky Juliano Raditya, Jason Juventia, Donabella Juwita, Dhiny Ellen Khasana, Andi Khuswatun Kinanti, Lamsiur Kiyoshi, Maximillian Ivander Koniardy, Delvina Kumala Dewi Laapen, Calinka Princess Belinda Lie , Cathleen Lim, Feili Lim, Grace Natalie Lo, Edmund Lumban Raja, Muhammad Dewo Maddalena Simamora, Indah Maria Manurung, Romandelas Marchvinn, Jessica Mardianto, Sebastian Edward Marina Marina Marva, Clairina Max, Alessandro Christian Mbaling, Constantius Mario Valentino Medianna, Olivia Metanoya Tapilatu, Finsri Mirza Djafar, Aureelia Nourani Mohammad, Prasidya Moody Rizqy Syailendra Putra Mousavian, Farel Sya'ban Mulyasetya Putra, Joddy Naelayara, Siti Amera Naru, Margareth Trisya Adefinola Natasha, Malika Baby Nathanael, Moses Nathasya, Nathasya NEGARA, MOH IQRA Neljeane, Jeane Novera HuIaifa, Shena Novianti, Siti Nugroho, Maria Cecilia Octavia S, Christine Octaviyanda, Shafarra Octavo, Vito Jonathan Oktavianni Putri Sianturi, Angel P, Moody Syailendra Pahlevi, Muhammad Vito Panglima, Rubby Aditya Patricia, Laura Sally Patricia, Rachel Anne Permatasari, Yofi Prasetyo, Stephanie Patricia Pratama, Akmal Risqi Yudhianto Priyono, Muhammad Yogi Septiyan Putra, Arief Mandala Putra, Ismail Rangga Wahana Putra, Louis Sebastian Anot Putri, Gracia Putri, Maria Phoebe Tjahja Putri, Nadiva Azzahra Putri, Salsabila Putri, Sanny Nuyessy Rahayu, Ni Kadek Putri Sita Rahma Pranadia, Maudy Rahmasari, Lisa Ramadhan, Nayla Az Zahra Ramadhano, Ibrahagi Ramania, Hasya Rigel, Rigel Riko Mono, Jonathan Riski, Naufal Riza Iskandar, Shafa Athaya Rondo, Fiona Louysa Ryanto, Laurencia Safitri, Yuliya Sahrul, Farhan Ananda Salindeho, Leezza Salsa sally, Laura Sandi, Maydi Jack Santoso, Ellen Sanyoto, Alicia Andromeda Septiandri, Ivon Shasmita, Sylvia Siarill, Jonathan Hervine Sihite, Jelita Sihite, Jelita Damai Sofia Lorenza Simanjuntak, Yosafat Ben Ghurion Sinaga, Efryando Stefen Andreas Siregar, Aristoteles Gerhard Fredrik Sitabuan, Tundjung Herning Sitorus, Lena Mariana Br Stella, Helen Subagijo, Kevin Putra Sugiarto, Angelina Jacqueline Sukur, Partermutios Susilo Putra Suryani, Cendana Suwinto Johan Syahputra, Denis Syailendra P, Moody R. Syailendra, Moody R. Tairas, Hans Daniel Felix Tan, Louissa Nobel Tania, Elizabeth Tanujaya, Calista Putri Terania, Medi Thie, Naysa Andrea Tirta, George Anderson Tjendra, Virginia Trisnadi, Ilhan Pasha Islamy Trixie, Ivana Vaustine, Griselda Vedora, Sheren Regina Veldrin Pua, Brendah Wardhana, Adi Pratomo Kusuma Wardhani, Ayu Azalia Wathan, Bilqis Alifia Wijaya, Miquel Enrick Wijaya, Niko William Chandra Winata, Gilbert Winson Salim, Patrick Yonandi, Caecilia Patrice Yuan, Shafaa Alaadini Yulyana, Devy Yunita, Theresia Yuwono, Lila Graciella Zalukhu, Iyan Sentosa Zebua, August Delta Zimah, Amelia Abdullah