Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
25.533
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI WAJAH HUKUM Awang Long Law Review Unes Law Review Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli AL-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Jurnal Yustitia Action Research Literate (ARL) Law Development Journal International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Journal of Social Research Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Journal of Accounting Management Business and International Research Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Sighat : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Journal of Mutidisciplinary Issues Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Journal of Law, Education and Business International Journal of Application on Economics and Business Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary Journal of Management Accounting, Tax and Production Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Abdi Masyarakat UIKA Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology SAKOLA: Journal of Sains Cooperative Learning and Law Journal of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Jurnal Akuntansi Hukum dan Edukasi Jurnal Sostekmas: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Teknologi, dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Journal of Business Inflation Management and Accounting Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities Jurnal Serina Abdimas
Lie, Gunardi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 215 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 215 Documents
Search

 16   17   18   19   20 
Comparative Study of Carbon Tax Regulations in Indonesia and Singapore Wathan, Bilqis Alifia; Lie, Gunardi
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): October
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.50321

Abstract

Climate change has become a global issue that urges countries to take concrete steps to reduce carbon emissions. Carbon tax is seen as a strategic fiscal instrument to achieve low-emission development. This study aims to compare the legal frameworks and carbon tax policies in Singapore and Indonesia, while assessing their implementation within the context of fiscal justice and environmental law. This research use normative juridical comparative approach, which analyze laws and regulations. The study findings indicate that Singapore implements a fixed rate carbon tax based on emission threshold alongside mandatory emissions reporting. Whilst Indonesia has only just begun implementing carbon tax with a minimum rate that is deemed too low as well as the lack of adequate technical regulations. Substantively, Indonesia still faces obstacles in determining the allocation of revenue from the carbon tax and ensuring the effectiveness of tax rates to influence economic behavior. This study concludes to emphasize the need for reformulation of carbon tax policy in Indonesia by adopting the polluter pays principle, implementing a mandatory emissions reporting system, and strengthening derivative regulations to be more adaptive and responsive to the challenges of climate change. Singapore's experience can serve as an important reference in designing a fairer and more effective carbon tax policy in Indonesia
Legal Standing of Foreign Entities in the Acquisition of Tiktok By Tokopedia: Perspectives from Corporate Law and Competition Law in Indonesia Putri, Maria Phoebe Tjahja; Lie, Gunardi
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Oktober, Social Issues and Problems in Society
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.50320

Abstract

The development of the digital economy has driven new dynamics in the e-commerce sector, including cross-border mergers and acquisitions involving foreign entities. The acquisition of Tokopedia by TikTok is an important case study for understanding the legal implications of vertical integration between global social media platforms and national e-commerce companies. This study aims to analyze TikTok's legal standing as a foreign entity in Tokopedia's ownership structure and examine the application of conditional clearance requirements by the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in maintaining fair competition and protecting national digital economic sovereignty. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative, conceptual, and case approach, with primary legal sources in the form of Law No. 40 of 2007, Law No. 5 of 1999, as well as KPPU Regulation No. 3 of 2019 and Permendag No. 31 of 2023. The results of the study show that TikTok formally complies with corporate law provisions, but its ownership structure continues to pose challenges to the principle of separation of foreign entities in the strategic digital sector. Meanwhile, the implementation of conditional clearance by the KPPU serves as a legal instrument to prevent market dominance, cross-platform data abuse, and anti-competitive practices, without hindering economic efficiency. Thus, strengthening supervision and synergy between institutions is key to balancing foreign investment openness with the protection of local businesses and national digital sovereignty
PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION LAW IN INDONESIA: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES Syailendra, Moody Rizqy; Lie, Gunardi; Sudiro, Ahmad
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 14, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research identifies challenges, obstacles and opportunities related to the issuance of Law No. 27 of 2022. Protection of personal data is crucial, especially in the use of information and communication technology in the current modern era. The contents of this article were analyzed using qualitative methods and secondary data in analyzing it. The research results show that: although the PDP Law was only implemented in 2022, regulations regarding PDP can actually be found in various pre-existing regulations, then there are principles and provisions that can be included in the PDP Law to better accommodate the need for protecting people's personal data, Furthermore, there are various challenges, obstacles and protections in implementing the PDP Law. The conclusion is that the passing of Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection in Indonesia marks a significant step in strengthening personal data protection for Indonesian citizens. However, implementing this law presents various challenges that the government must overcome.
The Application of the Strict Liability Principle in the Protection of Consumers of Digital Logistics Services: Penerapan Prinsip Strict Liability Dalam Perlindungan Konsumen Jasa Logistik Digital Diana, Diana; Lie, Gunardi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1384

Abstract

General background: The advancement of digital technology has revolutionized the logistics sector through application-based services that offer efficiency and convenience for consumers. Specific background: Nevertheless, the increasing reliance on digital logistics services has created new legal vulnerabilities, particularly when losses are caused by the actions of courier partners as third parties. Knowledge gap: Indonesia still lacks clear regulations governing the application of strict liability within digital logistics services, resulting in uncertainty regarding which party is legally responsible for consumer losses. Aims: This study aims to analyze the application of the strict liability principle in consumer protection within digital logistics services by examining the legal foundations, contractual structures, and implications of liability between companies and their courier partners. Results: The findings show that although the Consumer Protection Law requires business actors to bear consumer losses without proof of fault, its implementation remains weak due to standard contractual clauses that waive company responsibility, low consumer awareness, and limited government oversight. Novelty: This study provides a comprehensive understanding of the multilayered legal relationships between companies, partners, and consumers, highlighting the need for a vicarious liability approach within digital ecosystems. Implications: Strengthening the application of strict liability is essential to ensure fair compensation, increase public trust, and enhance accountability within Indonesia’s digital logistics services. Highlights: Strict liability strengthens consumer protection in digital logistics services. Legal ambiguity persists due to weak regulation and unclear contractual clauses. Companies remain the primary responsible party despite third-party courier involvement. Keywords: Strict Liability, Consumer Protection, Digital Logistics, Legal Responsibility, Courier Partners
The Legal Liability of Directors in State-Owned Enterprises: An Analysis of Judicial Inconsistencies in the Application of the Business Judgment Rule Doctrine: Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Direksi Perusahaan Milik Pemerintah: Analisis Perbedaan Putusan Hakim dalam Penerapan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule Art, Stanley Muljadi; Lie, Gunardi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1386

Abstract

General Background: The application of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) in Indonesia plays a crucial role in protecting directors from liability for business decisions that result in losses, provided such decisions are made in good faith and for corporate interests. Specific Background: In corruption cases involving directors of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), Indonesian courts show inconsistency in applying BJR, particularly when cases intersect with lex specialis provisions of the Anti-Corruption Law. Knowledge Gap: Existing studies have not comprehensively examined how judicial disparities affect legal certainty, protection, and the substantive realization of justice in corruption adjudication. Aims: This study analyzes the implementation of BJR in corruption cases, assesses the impact of judicial disparities on legal objectives, and identifies appropriate BJR application within the national legal framework. Results: Findings show that BJR is applied inconsistently—some cases acknowledge it as a valid protective doctrine, while others disregard it when corruption elements are proven under lex specialis rules. Novelty: This research bridges doctrinal analysis and case-based judicial evaluation to demonstrate how BJR interacts with principles of justice, legal certainty, and public benefit in corruption enforcement. Implications: The study highlights the need for clearer judicial guidelines to ensure consistent application of BJR without undermining the fight against corruption, thereby strengthening preventive legal protection and substantive justice. Highlights: Courts apply the Business Judgment Rule inconsistently in corruption cases. Lex specialis principles often override BJR protection when corruption elements are proven. Clearer judicial standards are needed to ensure fairness and legal certainty. Keywords: Business Judgment Rule, Corruption Law, Judicial Disparity, Soe Directors, Legal Certainty    
The Business Judgment Rule in the Context of Directors’ Liability: A Comparative Study of the United States, Canada, and Indonesia: Business Judgment Rule dalam Perspektif Pertanggungjawaban Direksi: Studi Perbandingan Amerika Serikat, Kanada, dan Indonesia Sanyoto, Alicia Andromeda; Lie, Gunardi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1387

Abstract

General background: Directors hold a strategic role in corporate governance, yet not all business decisions generate profits, exposing them to potential personal liability. Specific background: Differentiating reasonable business risks from negligence or bad faith remains a legal challenge across jurisdictions. Knowledge gap: Although the Business Judgment Rule, BJR, aims to protect directors who act prudently, in good faith, and based on adequate information, its formulation and judicial application differ significantly in the United States, Canada, and Indonesia, with Indonesia showing limited and inconsistent enforcement. Aims: This study analyzes the regulation and implementation of BJR in the three jurisdictions to evaluate how each balances managerial discretion and legal accountability. Results: The United States applies BJR as a strong presumption safeguarding informed and loyal decisions, Canada emphasizes judicial restraint based on the fairness of the decision-making process, and Indonesia codifies BJR principles but lacks clear evaluative standards in practice. Novelty: The study provides a comparative understanding of doctrinal and structural differences that shape the scope of director protection. Implications: Strengthening BJR interpretation and judicial guidelines in Indonesia is crucial to prevent hindsight bias, support responsible risk-taking, and enhance legal certainty in corporate governance. Highlights: The Business Judgment Rule protects directors who act in good faith, prudently, and with adequate information. The United States and Canada apply BJR through strong judicial restraint, while Indonesia’s application remains limited. Clearer BJR standards in Indonesia are essential to reduce hindsight bias and strengthen corporate governance. Keywords: Business Judgment Rule, Directors’ Liability, Comparative Corporate Law, Fiduciary Duty, Legal Accountability.
China’s Technological Self-Reliance Strategy in Responding to Western Corporate Monopoly and Dominance in the Technology Sector: A Legal Review of Competition Law across Various Legal Instruments: Strategi Kemandirian Teknologi Tiongkok dalam Menghadapi Monopoli dan Dominasi Korporasi Barat di Bidang Teknologi: Suatu Tinjauan Hukum Persaingan Usaha dalam Berbagai Produk Hukum Putra, Louis Sebastian Anot; Lie, Gunardi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1388

Abstract

Background (General): Western technological dominance has shaped global markets and innovation trajectories, creating structural imbalances in competition. Background (Specific): China faces this asymmetry with the rise of U.S. legal, economic, and technological pressures, particularly during escalating trade conflicts. Knowledge Gap: While many studies address industrial policy or competition law separately, limited scholarship integrates how China’s legal framework functions simultaneously as market regulation and geopolitical strategy. Aim: This study examines China’s technological self-reliance strategy by evaluating the role of the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) alongside major industrial policies in countering Western corporate hegemony. Results: Findings demonstrate that China employs AML with dual functionality—disciplining domestic giants such as Alibaba while fortifying national sovereignty against foreign corporate influence—and aligns this with three major initiatives: Made in China 2025, Dual Circulation Strategy, and China Standards 2035 to strengthen manufacturing capability, market independence, and global standard-setting authority. Novelty: Unlike traditional market-driven antitrust systems, China adopts state-oriented “antitrust mercantilism,” integrating competition law with industrial modernization and geopolitical objectives. Implications: The study indicates a shift in global competition norms, where national legal instruments increasingly function not only to balance market fairness but also to challenge structural dominance and redistribute global technological power. Highlights: China integrates antitrust law with industrial policy to strengthen technological independence. The strategy responds directly to Western corporate and geopolitical dominance in global technology. Policies such as MIC 2025, DCS, and China Standards 2035 reinforce sovereignty and global competitiveness. Keywords: Technological Self-Reliance, Anti-Monopoly Law, Industrial Policy, Western Dominance, China Strategy
Regulatory Disharmony of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) between State-Owned and Private Enterprises and Its Implications for Sustainable Development Indicators in Indonesia: Disharmoni Pengaturan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) antara Badan Usaha Milik Negara dan Perusahaan Swasta serta Implikasinya terhadap Tolok Ukur Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia Andriani, Kasmita; Lie, Gunardi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1389

Abstract

General Background: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Indonesia has transitioned toward the Triple Bottom Line, positioning CSR as a key driver of sustainable development. Specific Background: However, its implementation exhibits regulatory differences between State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and private companies, creating inconsistencies in legal obligations and funding mechanisms. Knowledge Gap: Existing CSR regulations emphasize formal compliance rather than measurable, sustainable impact, and little research examines how regulatory disharmony affects effectiveness. Aims: This study analyzes the juridical implications of regulatory disparities and evaluates CSR success benchmarks in relation to sustainable development principles. Results: Findings reveal two major implications: (1) discriminatory treatment, as CSR is mandatory for non–natural resource SOEs but voluntary for similar private firms, contradicting equality before the law; and (2) legal uncertainty due to conflicting norms on CSR funding sources. Additionally, a substantive gap appears between legal requirements and sustainability-oriented effectiveness indicators. Novelty: The study integrates legal analysis with sustainable development metrics, highlighting the need to shift CSR evaluation from compliance-based to impact-based frameworks. Implications: Harmonizing CSR regulation and adopting outcome-oriented benchmarks are essential to strengthen CSR’s contribution to Indonesia’s sustainable development agendas. Highlights: Regulatory inconsistencies create unequal CSR obligations between SOEs and private firms. Conflicting norms on funding sources generate legal uncertainty in CSR implementation. Effective CSR requires shifting from compliance-based evaluation to impact-based benchmarks. Keywords: CSR, Regulatory Disharmony, State-Owned Enterprises, Sustainable Development, Legal Uncertainty
The Employer’s Legal Obligations Toward Workers’ Rights Arising from Termination of Employment (A Comparative Study between Indonesia and Germany): Kewajiban Hukum Pengusaha Terhadap Hak Pekerja Akibat Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (Studi Komparatif Indonesia dan Jerman) Sitorus, Lena Mariana Br; Lie, Gunardi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1399

Abstract

General Background: Termination of employment remains a critical issue in labor law due to its social, economic, and legal consequences for workers. Specific Background: In Indonesia, despite comprehensive regulation under the Manpower Law and Job Creation Law, unilateral termination continues to occur, often without due process or fulfillment of workers’ entitlements, as illustrated in the case of PT X. Knowledge Gap: However, comparative studies examining the adequacy of Indonesian protections in relation to countries with stronger welfare-oriented systems, such as Germany, remain limited. Aims: This study aims to analyze the legal obligations of employers regarding workers’ rights arising from unilateral termination and to compare regulatory frameworks between Indonesia and Germany. Results: Findings show that Indonesia provides normative protection but faces weak enforcement, inconsistent application of compensation rules, and limited procedural safeguards, whereas Germany—through the Kündigungsschutzgesetz—implements stricter termination requirements, mandatory works-council consultation, and comprehensive social security support. Novelty: This study offers a detailed doctrinal and case-based comparison highlighting structural gaps in Indonesian law using a welfare-state benchmark. Implications: Strengthening enforcement mechanisms, enhancing oversight, and integrating social security-based protections could significantly improve Indonesia’s system for safeguarding workers against unjust termination. Highlights: Highlights the gap between normative regulation and practical enforcement in Indonesia. Emphasizes Germany’s stronger procedural and welfare-based safeguards for workers. Identifies the need for Indonesia to strengthen legal implementation and social protection mechanisms. Keywords: Termination of Employment, Legal Protection, Workers’ Rights, Labor Law
Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) Musisi di Industri Musik Indonesia: Studi Yuridis Terhadap Tantangan Penegakan Hak Cipta dan Distribusi Royalti di Era Digital Mousavian, Farel Sya'ban; Lie, Gunardi
SIGHAT: JURNAL HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAH Vol 4 No 1 (2025): SIGHAT: JURNAL HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAH
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/shighat_hes.v4i1.15090

Abstract

This study examines the protection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) for musicians in Indonesia’s music industry, focusing on the challenges of copyright enforcement and royalty distribution in the digital era. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, supported by library research. The findings reveal that copyright enforcement faces significant obstacles, including rampant digital piracy, limited law enforcement capacity, weak institutional coordination, and low public awareness of copyright compliance. Meanwhile, royalty distribution mechanisms remain ineffective due to lack of transparency, delayed payments, and the complex flow of digital revenues involving multiple stakeholders. These shortcomings undermine the effectiveness of IPR protection for musicians. Therefore, strategic measures are required, such as strengthening law enforcement capacity, enhancing the transparency and accountability of collective management organizations, and utilizing digital technologies such as fingerprinting, blockchain, and smart contracts. Synergy between law enforcement, royalty distribution governance, and technological innovation is essential to build a fair, transparent, and sustainable music ecosystem in Indonesia. Keywords: Intellectual Property Rights, copyright, royalty distribution, music industry, digital era
Co-Authors Adepio, Muhammad Fadel Ahmad Sudiro Ainun Jariyah, Sarifah Aisha, Salma Alam, Jenice Valencia Alfiani, Feriza Alya, Nasha Rawza Andrian Andrian Andriani, Kasmita Angela, Silvia Angelia Angelina, Made Aubrey Josephine Anggra, Philip Anindira, Lydia Antara Yasa, I Wayan Suka Anwar Rannu, Delycia Aprilia Fong, Fanesa Aprilia, Indah Siti Aprillianty, Kesia Apriza, Nathania Ardhan, Muhammad Urifianto ARI WAHYUDI Aritonang, Sanrio Art, Stanley Muljadi Augustin, Agatha Avianti, Grace Az-Zahra, Aiska Rahima Belle, Grace Anna Bianty, Thisia Bonang, Rio C, Gabriella Cahyono, Denzel Andersson Candra, Dimas Carnescia, Brenda Cendranita, Ivannia Chandra, Jessica Chen, Zefanya Angellin Christian, Benedict Philip Christine Octavia S Dameria, Fiorella Angella Daniel Daniel Diana Diana Egatri Gulo, Feby EVELYN EVELYN Fadhillah, Siti Aura Fauziah, Khanifa Febriany, Febriany Fernandha, Rizqy Dini Fernando, Wilson Furguson, Felix Goldwen, Filshella Gunawan, Syahrana Kezia Anjunien Halim, Leonardo Hamonangan, Marcellius Kirana Hapsari, Crescentia Viola Priscilla Audra Hartono, Evelyn Hartono, Margareta Kristiani Harum, Vanessa Mathilde Haykel, Muhammad Hermanto, Dennis Hitiyahubessy, Jeanifersu Jemiel Heng, Richard Jolin, Jolin Jonatan, Frangky Juliano Raditya, Jason Juventia, Donabella Juwita, Dhiny Ellen Khasana, Andi Khuswatun Kinanti, Lamsiur Kiyoshi, Maximillian Ivander Koniardy, Delvina Kumala Dewi Laapen, Calinka Princess Belinda Lie , Cathleen Lim, Feili Lim, Grace Natalie Lo, Edmund Lumban Raja, Muhammad Dewo Maddalena Simamora, Indah Maria Manurung, Romandelas Marchvinn, Jessica Mardianto, Sebastian Edward Mardjono, Amerta Marina Marina Marva, Clairina Max, Alessandro Christian Mbaling, Constantius Mario Valentino Medianna, Olivia Metanoya Tapilatu, Finsri Mirza Djafar, Aureelia Nourani Mohammad, Prasidya Moody Rizqy Syailendra Putra Mousavian, Farel Sya'ban Mulyasetya Putra, Joddy Naelayara, Siti Amera Naru, Margareth Trisya Adefinola Natasha, Malika Baby Nathanael, Jeremy Nathanael, Moses Nathasya, Nathasya NEGARA, MOH IQRA Neljeane, Jeane Novela, Devina Novera HuIaifa, Shena Novianti, Siti Nugroho, Maria Cecilia Octavia S, Christine Octaviyanda, Shafarra Octavo, Vito Jonathan Oktavianni Putri Sianturi, Angel P, Moody Syailendra Pahlevi, Muhammad Vito Panglima, Rubby Aditya Patricia, Laura Sally Patricia, Rachel Anne Patty, Thalia Rizq Aurora Permatasari, Yofi Prasetyo, Stephanie Patricia Pratama, Akmal Risqi Yudhianto Putra, Arief Mandala Putra, Ismail Rangga Wahana Putra, Louis Sebastian Anot Putri, Gracia Putri, Maria Phoebe Tjahja Putri, Nadiva Azzahra Putri, Salsabila Putri, Sanny Nuyessy R.Syailendra, Moody Rahayu, Ni Kadek Putri Sita Rahmasari, Lisa Ramadhan, Nayla Az Zahra Ramadhano, Ibrahagi Ramania, Hasya Rigel, Rigel Riko Mono, Jonathan Riski, Naufal Riza Iskandar, Shafa Athaya Rondo, Fiona Louysa Rusli, Vennia Neshya Ryanto, Laurencia Safitri, Yuliya Sahrul, Farhan Ananda Salindeho, Leezza Salsa sally, Laura Sandi, Maydi Jack Santoso, Ellen Sanyoto, Alicia Andromeda Septiandri, Ivon Serena, Michelle Audrey Shasmita, Sylvia Siarill, Jonathan Hervine Sihite, Jelita Sihite, Jelita Damai Sofia Lorenza Simanjuntak, Yosafat Ben Ghurion Sinaga, Efryando Stefen Andreas Siregar, Aristoteles Gerhard Fredrik Sitabuan, Tundjung Herning Sitompoel, Yervant T. S Sitorus, Lena Mariana Br Stella, Helen Subagijo, Kevin Putra Sugiarto, Angelina Jacqueline Sukur, Partermutios Susilo Putra Suryani, Cendana Suwinto Johan Syahputra, Denis Syailendra P, Moody R. Syailendra, Moody R. Syella Susilo, Sherryl Tairas, Hans Daniel Felix Tan, Louissa Nobel Tan, Richie Lay Tania, Elizabeth Tanujaya, Calista Putri Terania, Medi Thie, Naysa Andrea Thio, Herman Tirta, George Anderson Tjendra, Virginia Trisnadi, Ilhan Pasha Islamy Trixie, Ivana Umaternate, Arifin Vaustine, Griselda Vedora, Sheren Regina Veldrin Pua, Brendah Wardhani, Ayu Azalia Wathan, Bilqis Alifia Wijaya, Miquel Enrick Wijaya, Niko William Chandra Winata, Gilbert Winson Salim, Patrick Wonohadidjojo, Christopher Howard Yonandi, Caecilia Patrice Yuan, Shafaa Alaadini Yulyana, Devy Yunita, Theresia Yuwono, Lila Graciella Zalukhu, Iyan Sentosa Zebua, August Delta Zimah, Amelia Abdullah