p-Index From 2021 - 2026
20.061
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum JURNAL MAHKAMAH Jurnal Komunikasi Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Bina Hukum Lingkungan NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Jurnal Notariil Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Law Review Unes Law Review Jurnal Sains Riset Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli SYARIATI : Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hukum Eksekusi : Journal Of Law Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Law Development Journal COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Bina Hukum Lingkungan QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Aurelia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Journal of Business, Management and Social Studies Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Journal of Law, Education and Business Rechtsnormen Journal of Law Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology SAKOLA: Journal of Sains Cooperative Learning and Law LamLaj Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities Jurnal Serina Abdimas Qiyas : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Calon Notaris dalam Menjaga Kerahasiaan Pembuatan Akta dalam Optik Kepastian Hukum Khemal Akbar, Moh.; Rasji, Rasji
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1506

Abstract

In functional subjectivity in law, a person who is a notary in criminal or civil and administrative matters due to the impact of not being able to maintain the confidentiality of the making of a deed can be associated through laws that are related to preventive legal protection for notaries. The aim of writing this scientific work is to analyze legal accountability. notary candidates in maintaining the confidentiality of deed making in the optics of legal certainty. The research method used is the Normative Juridical method, with a statutory and conceptual approach. The types of legal materials are primary, secondary and tertiary using literature study techniques to search for legal materials. Analysis techniques for systematic interpretation of legal materials. The results obtained are efforts to protect the legal liability of prospective notaries in maintaining confidentiality making deeds in the optics of legal certainty contained in preventive law which has 2 (two) aspects, namely the internal aspect preventive legal protection in the form of considering worker qualifications, increasing supervision, making work agreements and repression. On the side externally, there are special provisions in the UUJN regarding the position of workers as an instrument witness. Repressive legal protection in the form of filing criminal cases and civil lawsuits. The existence of repressive efforts constitutes mitigation efforts, meaning that these efforts are emphasized more in the event of a lossborne by the Notary
Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Pada Perusahaan Fintech P2P Lending Dengan Jaminan Fidusia (Studi Kasus PT Modal Rakyat Indonesia) Natasya Mauly N, Denayu; Rasji, Rasji
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1887

Abstract

This study examines legal protections in Fintech peer-to-peer (P2P) lending companies utilizing fiduciary guarantees, with a specific focus on the case of PT Modal Rakyat Indonesia. It contextualizes the necessity of guarantee mechanisms in financial transactions and underscores the critical need for legal protections for both creditors and debtors within the Fintech P2P framework. The research methodology involves a legal analysis of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law and a detailed case study of PT Modal Rakyat Indonesia. The findings underscore the significance of creditor preference rights and the processes for dispute resolution following a default, discussing their broader implications for Fintech P2P lending practices.
Implikasi Hukum Keterangan Palsu yang diberikan oleh Panghadap Terhadap Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Ade Putra F Sumbara; Rasji, Rasji
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1987

Abstract

The legal implication for the Land Deed Official on the false statement given by the confrontant is the potential for PPAT to participate in the criminal act of making an authentic deed based on false information or document forgery. However, with the use of the analysis of Article 1365 of the Civil Code and regulations governing the duties functions and authority of PPAT. Then the PPAT has no material obligation in examining to prove the authenticity of the documents or information presented to him. If the formal examination has proven that there is no indication of document forgery and the PPAT makes an authentic letter to the applicant. Then the elements of criminal and unlawful acts are not included in the acts committed by the PPAT in making an authentic deed based on false information provided by the public/applicant to the PPAT.
Perspektif Hukum terhadap Perlindungan Anak Korban Kekerasan Seksual dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Silvia Cahyadi; Rasji, Rasji
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2004

Abstract

A nation's legal system must provide for the legal protection of children who are the victims of sexual assault. One of the main initiatives to give children who are victims of sexual assault proper legal protection is Law Number 12 of 2022 about Sexual assault Crimes. This article examines the numerous legal protection measures provided by Law Number 12 of 2022 through a content analysis. These measures include rules pertaining to the definition of sexual violence, court procedures, penalties for offenders, and victim rehabilitation initiatives. The investigation focuses on the potential and difficulties in implementing Law Number 12 of 2022 throughout society, as well as how it offers a thorough legal framework to safeguard the rights of children who are sexually abused.
Dinamika Permasalahan Ahli Waris dalam Penyerahan Protokol Notaris Meninggal Dunia Yulian, Fransisca Chatharina; Rasji, Rasji
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2042

Abstract

Notaris secara yuridis dilandasii berdasarkan UU RI No. 2 Tahun 2014 yang mengubah UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Salah satu ketentuan penting adalah Pasal 35 ayat (1) yang mengharuskan keluarga notaris yang meninggal untuk memberitahukan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD). Namun, prosedur penyerahan protokol notaris tidak diatur rinci, menyebabkan kekosongan hukum dan potensi masalah seperti kerusakan atau penyalahgunaan dokumen. Ahli waris seringkali kurang memahami kewajiban mereka, sehingga dapat mengakibatkan kerugian hukum dan administrasi. Ketentuan ini perlu diperjelas untuk memastikan keamanan dan kelancaran penyerahan protokol notaris. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan mengacu kepada aspek hukum positif yang berlaku di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Tanggungjawab ahli waris menurut Pasal 35 ayat (1) UUJN wajib memberitahukan MPD tentang meninggalnya notaris, sehingga ahli waris mengambil alih tanggung jawab notaris. Ini berarti ahli waris tidak hanya mewarisi harta benda tetapi juga tanggung jawab dan kewajiban profesi notaris. Pasal 63 ayat (2) UUJN mengatur penyerahan Protokol Notaris oleh ahli waris kepada notaris lain yang ditunjuk MPD. Ahli waris bertanggung jawab menjaga kelangsungan praktek notaris, memastikan aksesibilitas dokumen, dan menjamin keamanan dokumen Protokol Notaris. Penyerahan protokol harus dilakukan sesuai ketentuan hukum. Ahli waris bekerja sama dengan MPD dan notaris baru untuk menjaga keutuhan dan aksesibilitas dokumen penting ini, memberikan kepastian hukum dan melindungi hak-hak pihak yang terlibat dalam perbuatan hukum. Protokol Notaris harus disimpan dengan baik meskipun notaris pensiun atau meninggal dunia, sesuai Pasal 65 UUJN. Notaris bertanggung jawab atas setiap akta yang dibuatnya seumur hidup, bahkan setelah protokol diserahkan ke penerima protokol. Penyerahan protokol oleh ahli waris wajib dilaporkan ke Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) dalam 7 hari kerja. Protokol harus diserahkan ke notaris penerima dalam 30 hari dengan berita acara. Jika notaris meninggal saat cuti, Pejabat Sementara Notaris menyerahkan protokol dalam 60 hari. Prosedur ini memastikan tanggung jawab beralih ke notaris penerima protokol, melibatkan ahli waris, MPD, dan pejabat sementara notaris, serta menghindari masalah hukum dan administrasi terkait dokumen notaris.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pengembang Properti Yang Dinyatakan Pailit Terhadap Pemenuhan Kewajiban Kepada Konsumen Ditinjau Dari Teori Kepastian Hukum Evelyn Millechen; Rasji, Rasji
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2046

Abstract

The need for adequate housing is a mandate of the Constitution. This is what encourages the growth of the house development industry and ready-to-live buildings in Indonesia. However, in its implementation, the community is often faced with the problem of developer companies being declared bankrupt, causing legal uncertainty for consumers. This is what makes researchers interested in examining these legal issues. This research uses normative juridical research with a statutory approach through secondary data searches. The result of this research is that when the developer enters PKPU and is even declared bankrupt, it is the consumers who suffer great losses. Because, if the developer is declared bankrupt and the Deed of Sale and Purchase (AJB) has not yet belonged to the consumer, the consumer's assets will also be confiscated and auctioned, and the consumer does not necessarily get a share of the proceeds from the auction because it is not certain that the results are sufficient to pay off his share. In this case, it can be seen that in bankruptcy cases, consumers are the most vulnerable. In the absence of AJB in addition to being the last creditor, the consumer is not the owner of the land and the land will be auctioned and divided by the separatist creditor. There needs to be an effort from the government to form a specific regulation governing further provisions and the position of creditors in bankruptcy, PPJB, reservation agreements, Pre-Project Selling obligations of developers, as well as sanctions if it is found that the development company has defaulted or broken promises. Because the Bankruptcy Law and GCPL have different solutions from each other, it is necessary to have clearer arrangements between bankruptcy and consumer protection to create legal certainty.
Considering the Effectiveness of Circulars: Finding Alternative of Medium Public Communication Rasji, Rasji; Paramita, Sinta; Pandrianto, Nigar
Jurnal Komunikasi Vol. 14 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Komunikasi
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/jk.v14i1.18185

Abstract

Indonesia has laws and regulations that regulate people's behavior. Therefore, the government must communicate effectively with the community, so that they can obey it. In order for the implementation of legislation to be more effective, the government issues circulars addressed to the public. This circular contains technical information or messages that need to be carried out by the public. This article discusses the effectiveness of government legal communication to the public through circulars. This research approach is quantitative by conducting surveys and normative observations of secondary data in the form of circulars, expert views from various references, and regulations related to circulars. The results showed that the government's legal communication to the public through circulars was mostly effective. This is because circulars made by government officials are more of a regulatory nature (as a regulation), and a small part are stipulating (as a stipulation). This circular is a one-sided message from government officials to other officials or the general public as communicants. The nature of regulating circular letters can be in the form of orders or recommendations that are mandatory or which can be carried out by the communicant. However, the public has the right not to implement the government's message if the contents of the circular contradict the applicable regulations. This is done through a judicial review process. However, in general, government circulars are understood, accepted and implemented by the public
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DARI PEMUTUSAN KERJA SEPIHAK BERDASARKAN PADA UU NO. 13 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG KETENAGAKERJAAN Acchedya Wijaya, Fico; Dustin, Briyan; Rasji, Rasji
NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Vol 10, No 6 (2023): NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jips.v10i6.2023.2849-2863

Abstract

Perlindungan  hukum  untuk  buruh / pekerja  perusahaan  x  yang  mendapatkan  peutusan  hubungan kerja (PHK) secara sepihak merupakan bahwa pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) untuk buruh terkait diputuskan batal demi hukum karena berdasar pada Pasal 151 ayat (3) Undang-undang Nomor   13   Tahun   2003   tentang   Ketenagakerjaan, jika pengusaha ingin melaksanakan  pemutusan hubungan kerja terhadap  buruhnya,  harus  lebih  dulu  mendapatkan  penetapan dari  Lembaga  Penyelesaian  Perselisihan  Hubungan  Industrial. Metode  penulisan dalam  penulisan ini menggunakan  jenis  penelitian hukum doktrinal  atau  normatif,  yang  mengkaji  hukum  sebagai  norma. Sedangkan apabila dilihat dari sumber data yang tersaji adalah penelitian doktrinal atau normatif. Teknik  analisa  data  yang  dipakai  adalah teknik  analisis  isi (content  analysis). Hasil  pembahasan  menggaris-bawahi bahwa semestinya ada  sanksi  yang lebih tegas  bagi setiap  pelanggaran pada  praktik  ketenagakerjaan  yang  dilaksanakan  oleh  pihak  pengusaha, hal ini agar  berkurang  terjadinya  lagi  PHK  sepihak  yang  sangat merugikan pihak buruh  dan  pekerja pengawas ketenagakerjaan dari Pemerintahan pusat maupun daerah harus lebih intensif melakukan pemantauan ketenagakerjaan terhadap kasus pemutusan hubungan kerja  secara sepihak.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PEMBAYARAN UPAH PEKERJA DI BAWAH UPAH MINIMUM OLEH PENGUSAHA PASKA PENGESAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA Hadi Wibowo, Satria; Rasji, Rasji
NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Vol 10, No 9 (2023): NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jips.v10i9.2023.4442-4450

Abstract

Indonesia terkenal dengan tenaga kerja yang murah dan jumlah yang sangat banyak. Pembayaran upah kepada pekerja merupakan salah satu unsur penting dalam hubungan kerja yang adil dan seimbang antara pengusaha dan pekerja. Namun, kerapkali para pemberi kerja memberikan upah di bawah upah minimum bagi karyawannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Metode ini dipilih karena memungkinkan peneliti mendapatkan wawasan mengenai perubahan hukum terkait pengusaha yang membayar pekerja di bawah upah minimum setelah Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Cipta Kerja disahkan. Berdasarkan UUD NRI 1945 ditetapkan bahwa upah harus membantu umat manusia memperoleh penghidupan yang layak, sehingga menjamin upah yang layak untuk hidup dan kemanusiaan merupakan konsep pengupahan yang diterapkan secara konstitusional di Indonesia. Sejatinya dalam Konstitusi telah diatur mengenai pentingnya hak upah bagi para pekerja yang termaktub dalam Pasal 28D ayat (2) UU NRI 1945. Hal ini kemudian diatur lebih lanjut dalam Pasal 81 angka 28 Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Cipta Kerja yang menyatakan bahwa pemberi kerja dilarang untuk membayarkan upah di bawah upah minimum yang telah ditetapkan kepada pekerja. Bagi pekerja yang tidak mematuhi ketentuan ini maka dapat dikenakan sanksi sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 88 angka 66 Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Cipta Kerja.
Judicial Reasoning in Personal Data Misuse Cases: The Application of the Personal Data Protection Law in Court Decisions Chandra, Clarissa Mayella; Rasji, Rasji
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.350

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has heightened the risk of personal data misuse, thereby necessitating effective law enforcement under Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection (PDP Law). This study aims to examine judges’ legal reasoning in adjudicating cases of personal data misuse and to analyze the application of the PDP Law within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. Specifically, it assesses the alignment between the ideal legal principles (das sollen) and the practical implementation (das sein). Employing a normative juridical approach combined with qualitative analysis, this research examines three court decisions: Decision No. 77/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Tangerang, Decision No. 78/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Tangerang, and Decision No. 5/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Karanganyar. The findings reveal that judges have begun to internalize the paradigm of personal data protection through the application of Articles 67 and 68 of the PDP Law, although variations in interpretation and implementation persist. The study concludes that Indonesia’s judicial practice is undergoing a gradual transition toward a more consistent enforcement of privacy law, yet further development of jurisprudential guidelines and enhanced judicial capacity remain essential to strengthening privacy protection in the digital era.
Co-Authors Abilah, Rahma Christabel Acchedya Wijaya, Fico Adam Ramadhan Adam, Chistopher Kendrick Ade Putra F Sumbara Adenfa, Alexandrio Akhir, Akhirudin Alfarhani, Luqyana Shafira Alfiani, Feriza Alhadad, Fahrul Alsabilah, Zahra Angelina, Aubrey Josephine Angelina, Vilyn Anggitha, Fricila Anggra, Philip Angkasa, Wincent Hungstan Apriza, Nathania Apryano, Argya Attallah Ar Rohma, Inayah Arrasyiid, Muhammad Restu Augustin, Agatha Aulia, Dzikrina Aulia, Riska Aurelia, Jessica Axfelia, Deviana Azahra, Natasya Sabrina Baeha, David Lestarius Immanuel Baloch, Sania Mari Basri, Bryan Alexander Beale, Aurelius Steven Bobyanti, Feny Budiman, Eunike Kathryn Cailla, Glenn Kevin Candela, Vincent Chandra, Clarissa Mayella Chandra, Jessica Chaniago, Fathimathuz Zachra De Chen, Zefanya Angellin Cherieshta, Jocelyn Christella, Christella Chua, Jessica Clarissa Aurelia Susanto Clarosa, Vivian Claudia, Jennifer Clementino Moningka, Yosia Damanik, Gabriel Yericho Darmansyah, Adimas Gusti Davin, Auliadi Achmad Defilania, Oktri Dikjaya, Dikjaya Djaja, Benny Djayanti, Djayanti Dustin, Briyan Edyson, David Effendi, Kevin Noble Eida, Tri Salwa Nur Ekaprasetya, Ekaprasetya Endang Lestari Erdiyanto, Rizqy Pratama Estellin, Emmanuella Audry Evelyn Millechen Fadloli, Muhammad Farhana, Alia Fatimatuzzahra Fatimatuzzahra Febriany, Febriany Femilia, Naomi Ferselli, Aurellia Karin Florencia, Cherlyne Baby Gabriella Ranti Gazali, Narumi Bungas Gea, Poppy Primadana Top Givanti, Dofana Gosan, John Tiel Gulo, Barnabas Juni Saputra Gunawan, Gabriela Hadi Wibowo, Satria Hamonangan, Marcellius Kirana Harahap, Abi Hamdalah Sorimuda Hartono, Ernita Dewy Hartono, Margareta Kristiani Hasta, Baharuddin Jusuf Habibie Helmi, Teofilus Titus Hendry, Hillary Hong, Carissa Patricia Hotma Elisa Irene Siahaan Howard, Christopher Hutabarat, Ela Suryani Hutapea, Junika Gabriella Cecille Imanto, Kesya Swietenia Maharani Jonatan, Frangky Jonathan, Edward Jovian, Erland Julius, Lollyta Juwita, Dhiny Ellen Kabalmay, Brinet Lydia Kamila, Amalia Kartika, Yenni Kelvianto, Carmella Khaulah, Tatsbita Khemal Akbar, Moh. Kusniawan, Jovindi Fernando Laapen, Calinka Princess Belinda Lambonan, Jestika Erika Lestari, Novianti Liumenti, Liumenti Liunda, Sheren Agapena Hosaya Lukmadi, Fionna Khantidevi Luvianti, Teressyavira Maharani, Shavira Ardita Manggal, Adam Tanzio Marhein, Vannestian Marina Marina Mbayang, Chrissonia Margareta Mella Ismelina Farma Rahayu Michael Michael Michellena, Michellena Muslih, Sarazatin Ananda Muzahadah, Fadiya Najla, Tengku Amira Natasya Mauly N, Denayu Nathasya, Nathasya Nazhimah, Shafira Nigar Pandrianto Novianti, Siti Nugroho, Hizkia Ivan Octwelfth, Florentina Ezrahi Oktavian, Ivan Danara Pahlawan, Sandra Dwi Putri Patricia, Viane Phua, Steven Cai Lee Pramita, Helen Pratama, Muhammad Lutfi Priscilla, Nathalie Purba, Evaline Suhunan Purba, Nanda Divabuena Purwanti, Puja Ayu Puspita, Salsabillah Ayu Putra, Louis Sebastian Anot Putra, Surya Dharma Putri Apriliani, Narisa Putri, Amanda Fitriani Eka Putri, Audrey Bilbina Putri, Belicia Widhyana Yulia Putri, Nadiva Azzahra Putri, Sanny Nuyessy Quinn, Luverne Pujian Rafi, Paksi Rafliyansyah, Rafliyansyah Ramadhan, Nayla Az Zahra Rannu, Delycia Anwar Refalia, Salsa Revina, Revina Rewiyaga, Rewiyaga Rigel, Rigel Rokhim, Akbar Nur Rudijanto, Maria Natasha Rukmana, Kevin Rukmana, Kevin Anandita Rusli, Vennia Neshya Ryanto, Laurencia Sani, Ayi Meidyna Santoso, Ellen Saputri, Sherlyana Indah Sari, Emmanuela Komala Sepriani, Sarnida Serena, Michelle Audrey Setiadi, Margaretha Putri Setiawaty, Tiffany Silvia Cahyadi Simarmata, Michael Kalep Singhs, Arief Dermawan Sinta Paramita Siregar, Rachel Adeline Siswanto, Vivienne Olivia Sitompoel, Yervant T. S Situmorang, Waldus Sriyanto, Mohammad Rubby Sugara, Maria Vianney Lourdes Sugiarto, Angelina Jacqueline Sulastri Sulastri Sulistio, Felicia Amanda Sulthanah, Lubna Tabriz Sumbayak, Marlyn Christ Nathasia Br Suryani, Cendana Syamila, Najma Tanujaya, Calista Putri Usman, Raphaellee Peters Putra Valerie, Athalia De Vanessa Vanessa Vaustine, Griselda Vedora, Sheren Regina Vera, Vionna Vetty Virginia, Virginia Wadu, Chyrila Tifany Mailakay Hernics Wafi, Auzan Wardhana, Adi Pratomo Kusuma Widagdo, Chanandika Dafri Widjaja, Jason Marcellino Widjaja, Jety William Chandra Win, Han Wonohadidjojo, Christopher Howard Yandika, Nayla Putri Yetmiaty, Yetmiaty Yudha, Refans Jaka Pratama Yulian, Fransisca Chatharina Yuliska, Nanda Yuliyani, Allya Putri Yulyana, Devy Yuwono Prianto Zimah, Amelia Abdullah