p-Index From 2021 - 2026
19.885
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan Mimbar PGSD Undiksha Kolaboratif Jurnal Demokrasi Bioeducation Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional BioCONCETTA Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Sumatra Journal of Disaster, Geography and Geography Education Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) Jurnal Pendidikan : Riset dan Konseptual Proceedings of the 1st UR International Conference on Educational Sciences Jurnal PIPSI: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Indonesia International Journal of Research in Counseling and Education JURNAL EKSAKTA PENDIDIKAN (JEP) JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Basicedu VOX EDUKASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan Aulad : Journal on Early Childhood Journal on Education International Journal of Educational Dynamics (IJEDS) MUHARRIK: JURNAL DAKWAH DAN SOSIAL Global Conference Index JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala Journal of Civic Education EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN SOSHUM : Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora [Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities] Menara Ilmu M A T H L I N E : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies JPGI (Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia) Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling SCAFFOLDING: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Multikulturalisme Jurnal Socius: Journal of Sociology Research and Education Abdi: Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Journal of Vocational Education Studies (JOVES) Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan) At-Tarbawi : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Kebudayaan UTAMAX : Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Indonesian Journal of Instructional Media and Model Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education JURNAL CERDAS PROKLAMATOR International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Jurnal Basicedu Journal of Education, Cultural, and Politics ANWARUL: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Dakwah JPOL: Journal of Pedagogy and Online Learning CONSEN: Indonesian Journal of Community Services and Engagement Langgam International Journal of Social Science Education, Art and Culture Journal of Vocational Education and Information Technology (JVEIT) JURNAL PARADIGMA: Journal of Sociology Research and Education Jurnal Aplikasi IPTEK Indonesia Al-DYAS : Jurnal Inovasi dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Indonesian Research Journal on Education Lemma: Letters of Mathematics Education Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia Jurnal Ideologi dan Konstitusi Konstruktivisme : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counseling and Education
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Self-regulated learning: does it affect mathematics learning outcomes? Handican, Rhomiy; Riva Darwata, Siti; Ananda, Azwar; Mukhaiyar, Mukhaiyar
At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Kebudayaan Vol 9 No 2 (2022): At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Kebudayaan
Publisher : the Faculty of Education and Teacher Training of the Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/tarbawi.v9i2.5076

Abstract

Many factors can affect student learning success, especially math learning outcomes which are considered a difficult subject by students. One of the factors is the self-regulation system in learning. Self-regulation system or known as self-regulated learning is certainly different among students. So, the purpose of this study is to determine the level of self-regulated learning and its effect on math learning outcomes. This research is quantitative research using an on-experimental research type with a survey method. The sample used in this study amounted to 40 students who were taken randomly using simple random sampling. While data collection was done with questionnaires and documentation. The data were analyzed using the Pearson product-moment test. From the results of the analysis at a significant level of 5%, it was concluded that there was a significant influence between self-regulated learning on students' math learning outcomes. With the contribution of variable X to variable Y amounting to 32.49%. This means that 32.49% of students' math learning outcomes are determined by self-regulated learning and 67.51% are determined by other variables that are not studied
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD dengan Pendekatan SAVI dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar PPKn Anwar, Yenita; Ananda, Azwar; Montessori, Maria; Khairani, Khairani
Jurnal Basicedu Vol. 6 No. 4 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3355

Abstract

Pembelajaran PPKn dengan Kurikulum 2013 mempunyai visi, misi, dan tujuan yang baru dan jelas sesuai dengan perkembangan zaman dan tantangan  global dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat, berbangsa dan bernegara di era milenium abad ke-21. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar, motivasi  belajar yang tinggi, rendah PPKn antara model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dengan pendekatan SAVI dengan model konvensional, dan untuk mengetahui interaksi model kooperatif Tipe STAD dengan pendekatan SAVI dengan motivasi pada hasil belajar. bentuk penelitian ini adalah menggunakan metode  penelitian kuantitatif Quasi experimental design (eksperimen semu). Penelitian ini memakai dua kelas sampel, yaitu kelas kontrol dan kelas eksperimen. Pada kelas eksperimen diberi perlakuan dengan menggunakan model cooperatif tipe STAD dengan pendekatan SAVI. Sedangkan pada kelas kontrol tanpa menggunakan cooperatif tipe STAD dengan pendekatan SAVI dalam pembelajaran. Penilaian yang diberikan adalah penilaian test baik dikelas eksperimen maupun kelas kontrol. Hasil penelitian menjukan  bahwa nilai Fhitung  = 3,59 > Ftabel ( = 0,05)  =3,30. Hal itu berarti bahwa Ho ditolak dan H1 diterima. Sedangkan Hasil pengujian korelasi  berdasarkan perhitungan ANAVA di atas tampak  bahwa nilai F hitung = 9,20  > F tabel ( = 01)  = 5,34.  Hal tersebut berarti Ho  ditolak dan H1 diterima, dengan demikian hipotesis yang menyatakan terdapat korelasi antara pemberian bentuk teknik pembelajaran  dengan dorongan motivasi belajar adalah terbukti sangat signifikan.
Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar dan Lingkungan Keluarga terhadap Hasil Belajar PPKn Siswa Nasution, Hafizhah Hamim; Dewi, Susi Fitria; Ananda, Azwar; Khairani, Khairani
Jurnal Basicedu Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/basicedu.v7i1.4385

Abstract

Motivasi sangat diperlukan, belajar tanpa adanya motivasi tidak mungkin seseorang dapat menyelesaikan kegiatan belajar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh motivasi belajar, lingkungan keluarga terhadap hasil belajar PPKN siswa SMPN 15 Islam Terpadu Kota Binjai. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 57 siswa. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini, motivasi belajar berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap hasil belajar siswa, dengan t-hitung sebesar 3,503. Pengaruh positif dan signifikan lingkungan rumah terhadap hasil belajar siswa memiliki t-hitung sebesar 2,028. Motivasiibelajar dan lingkunganikeluarga berpengaruh positif signifikaniterhadap hasil belajar siswa SMP N 15 IT Binjai. Lingkungan rumah dan sekolah merupakannfaktor yang dapat memotivasiysiswa untuk belajar. Adanya perhatian, bimbingan dan dukungan orang tua kepada anaknya serta suasana dan fasilitas kekeluargaan yang kondusif juga dapat meningkatkan motivasi belajar. Semakin tinggi motivasi belajar siswa maka akan semakin tinggi pula hasil belajar yang akan dicapai siswa.
Kurikulum Matematika Sekolah di Australia: Suatu Perbandingan dengan Indonesia Mirna, Mirna; Aysi, Rohadatul; Ananda, Azwar; Gistituati, Nurhizrah; Rusdinal, Rusdinal
Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Volume 8 Nomor 1
Publisher : Mathematics Education Study Program

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/cendekia.v8i1.2810

Abstract

Perbandingan pendidikan menjadi salah satu cara untuk mengambil praktik baik dari negara lain untuk diterapkan di Indonesia. Australia sebagai salah satu negara dengan kualitas pendidikan terbaik dunia menjadi negara yang pantas untuk digali lebih lanjut. Metode dalam penelitian ini adalah literature review untuk studi komparatif kedua negara. Berdasarkan studi komparatif yang dilaksanakan ditemukan bahwa terdapat beberapa perbedaan dalam kurikulum matematika Indonesia dan Australia. Kurikulum Australia disusun dalam Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) dan Indonesia sedang dalam masa peralihan dari Kurikulum 2013 ke Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Secara umum materi pembelajaran matematika pada tingkat sekolah dasar dari kedua negara yaitu bilangan, aljabar, pengukuran, ruang, statistik, dan peluang. Perbedaannya adalah pada struktur kurikulum serta cakupan konten dari masing-masing materi, kedalaman, dan pengalaman belajar. Di antara kelebihan kurikulum Australia yang dapat ditauladani oleh Indonesia adalah pada aspek memenuhi kebutuhan peserta didik dengan pengalaman yang relevan, kontemporer dan menarik. Selanjutnya juga pada aspek sajiannya yang lebih lengkap karena diperkaya melalui pengembangan konten yang dipertimbangkan dan terfokus secara alami, serta menawarkan kesempatan untuk menambah kedalaman dan keluasan pembelajaran dalam elaborasi konten.
Analysis of Fogarty Model In Social Studies Learning Elpalina, Srimutia; Ananda, Azwar; Fatimah, Siti
LANGGAM: International Journal of Social Science Education, Art and Culture Vol 3 No 2 (2024): LANGGAM: International Journal of Social Science Education, Art and Culture (June
Publisher : Master Program of Social Science Education of Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/langgam.v3i2.207

Abstract

Social Sciences (IPS) education has an important role in the educational curriculum to form a holistic understanding of society, culture, history and geography. However, the development of integrated social studies education materials is still faced with a number of challenges, such as teacher unpreparedness, lack of personality competence, and difficulties in integrating concepts from various scientific disciplines in a meaningful way for students. This study aims to investigate the process of formulating and developing integrated social studies educational materials according to Robin Fogarty's contribution and identifying effective strategies to overcome these challenges. The research method used is literature study with a qualitative approach. Data were analyzed using content and descriptive analysis methods from various relevant literature sources. The research results show that the development of integrated social studies education materials according to Robin Fogarty's contribution involves various models, such as the Cellular Model, Connected Model, Nested Model, Sequenced Model, Shared Model, Webbed Model, Threaded Model, Integrated Model, and Immersed Model. Each model provides a different approach to integrating curriculum and facilitating cross-disciplinary learning. Even though each model has its own advantages, each model also has its own limitations and challenges in implementation. The discussion highlights the importance of developing integrated social studies educational materials in developing students' holistic understanding of society and culture and preparing them to become active citizens and participants in a multicultural and global society. The challenges faced in developing this material can be overcome through strategies such as developing learning models that emphasize integration aspects, preparing interesting and relevant teaching materials, as well as training for teachers in implementing an integrated social studies learning approach effectively. It is hoped that this research can make a significant contribution to the development of more effective and relevant social studies curriculum and learning practices in the future.
A Comparison of Science Education between Germany, China and Indonesia Ardi, Ardi; Ananda, Azwar; Rusdinal, Rusdinal; Giastituati, Nurhizrah; Hervi, Fauziah
JURNAL EKSAKTA PENDIDIKAN (JEP) Vol 8 No 1 (2024): JEP (Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan)
Publisher : Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jep/vol8-iss1/806

Abstract

The development of a science-based society is strongly influenced by science education. The comparison of science education between Germany, China and Indonesia is an interesting topic because they have different traditions and approaches to developing their science education systems. This research aims to study the differences in science education in Germany, China and Indonesia. This research will compare science education between the three countries through several aspects, such as curriculum, teaching methods, teacher training, educational infrastructure, challenges and opportunities, and philosophical basis. The secondary data used in this research is obtained from reliable sources. The results show that the science education system in Germany is highly organised and focuses on an in-depth understanding of concepts. In contrast, science education in China is highly competitive, and academic achievement is prioritised. Science education in Indonesia tries to combine concept understanding and practical skills. However, implementation and assessment still need to be improved. Thus, a comparison of science education in Germany, China and Indonesia shows differences in curriculum, teaching methods, teacher training, educational infrastructure, opportunity challenges and philosophical basis. Each country has advantages and disadvantages. By thoroughly understanding science education in these countries, we can find many lessons that can be used to improve the science education system. Collaborative efforts and exchange of experiences between these countries will help improve science education.
Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif Tipe The Great Wind Blows terhadap Tingkat Kecemasan Matematis Siswa di Sekolah Dasar Setiawan, Herdi; Nurhizrah Gistituati; Azwar Ananda; Rusdinal; Rahmi Putri
Cerdas Proklamator Vol 11 No 2 (2023): JURNAL CERDAS PROKLAMATOR
Publisher : Study program PGSD FKIP Universitas Bung Hatta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Math anxiety is one of the most serious obstacles in education. Based on the results of observations, there are early indications that students experience anxiety in learning mathematics. The purpose of this study was to see the effect of the great wind blows type of active learning strategy on the level of students' mathematical anxiety. The method used for this paper is a quantitative method using a pre-experimental design. the pre-experimental design with the one group pretest post test design was used because the researcher wanted to see the difference between the level of anxiety before the action was taken and after the action was carried out so that from these results it could be seen whether there was an influence or not from the learning strategy used. The results of this study indicate that the average value of the posttest results obtained an average value of 45.32 with a standard deviation of 8.55 while the pretest results obtained an average value of 54.64 with a standard deviation of 9.21. the great wind blows type of active learning strategy (posttest) tends to decrease compared to before using the great wind blows type of active learning strategy (pretest).
PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDIDIKAN NEGARA JEPANG DAN INDONESIA Adek Nilasari Harahap; Azwar Ananda; Nurhizrah Gistituati; Rusdinal Rusdinal; Tinur Rahmawati
JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT Vol 12 No 1 (2024): Vol 12 No 1 Januari 2024
Publisher : Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37081/ed.v12i1.5272

Abstract

Indonesia and Japan have different education systems. The Japanese and Indonesian education systems each have unique advantages and disadvantages. Indonesia is currently ranked 72 out of 77 countries, Indonesia's education system needs greater attention. There are many education experts born in Indonesia who can improve the education system in Indonesia. Indonesia's education system is moving on the right track. Comparing Indonesia with countries that have strong education systems, such as Japan, is one strategy to move the Indonesian education system in the right direction. with countries that have strong educational institutions, such as Japan. Children in Japan are taught moral principles, politeness, and discipline starting from the age of 0 to 4. Children in Japan who have reached the fourth grade of elementary school have to take exams that are not too tough for other students. Exams that are not too burdensome for students. The Japanese education system has a lot to offer Indonesia.
KOREA DAN JEPANG : ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDIDIKAN UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS PENDIDIKAN DI MASA DEPAN Rahmi Putri; Rusdina Rusdina; Azwar Ananda; Nurhizrah Gistituati
JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT Vol 12 No 1 (2024): Vol 12 No 1 Januari 2024
Publisher : Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37081/ed.v12i1.5297

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi bagaimana kesamaan sistem pendidikan Jepang dan Korea Selatan muncul sepanjang abad ke-20 dan menyelidiki alasan di balik perbedaan mereka di tahun 1990-an dengan munculnya kebijakan TIK dalam pendidikan. Menggunakan analisis naratif dan perbandingan berorientasi kasus, penelitian ini mengeksplorasi bagaimana elemen politik dan ekonomi Jepang dan Korea Selatan memengaruhi cara mereka mengembangkan sistem pendidikan yang serupa dan bagaimana perubahan elemen tersebut kemudian mengalihkan arah dari masing-masing sistem. Sistem pendidikan Jepang dan Korea Selatan memiliki kesamaan karena kombinasi modernisasi, kolonisasi, dan konservatisme. Namun, perubahan lanskap politik dan ekonomi Korea Selatan menghasilkan sistem yang siap untuk reformasi dramatis, sementara Jepang mempertahankan kelanjutan pihak pembuat keputusan sebelumnya, yang mengakibatkan perubahan yang kurang aktif. Hasil ini berkontribusi pada perbedaan sistem pendidikan dengan munculnya kebijakan TIK. Pembuat kebijakan dapat melihat bagaimana sistem pendidikan yang serupa dapat berubah dengan munculnya teknologi baru dan faktor apa yang dapat mempengaruhi adopsi teknologi pendidikan. Studi ini memperluas studi yang membandingkan Jepang dan Korea Selatan ke dalam bidang pendidikan. Studi ini mengilustrasikan alasan komprehensif di balik persamaan dan perbedaan yang terlihat antara sistem pendidikan Jepang dan Korea Selatan
STUDI KOMPARATIF KURIKULUM MATEMATIKA SEKOLAH DASAR INDONESIA DAN AUSTRALIA Rilla Gina Gunawan; Eri Rozika; Rusdinal Rusdinal; Nurhizrah Gistituati; Azwar Ananda
JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT Vol 12 No 1 (2024): Vol 12 No 1 Januari 2024
Publisher : Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37081/ed.v12i1.5304

Abstract

Education policies certainly vary from country to country. To achieve the main goal of education, the Indonesian and Australian governments should work to improve the quality of education in their respective countries by conducting possible curriculum comparisons with other countries. The main objective of this study is to compare the primary school mathematics curriculum in Indonesia and Australia. What are the parallels and differences between the paradigms embedded in the Australian and Indonesian curricula? The research also aimed to find information that would allow a more thorough comparison of the two countries' education systems and mathematics curricula. Mathematics curricula and textbooks from both countries were analyzed for this study, making document analysis the main methodological choice. The research method used was a comparative analysis using qualitative techniques conducted to highlight the similarities and differences between the two. Results show that the Australian mathematics curriculum follows the guidelines set by the National Mathematics Standards Teacher Council of the United States, New Zealand, Finland and the United Kingdom. The topics covered outline the curriculum to be presented to students i.e. Comprehension, fluency, problem solving and reasoning are all addressed as part of the skillset. It is different with Indonesia which is currently using the 2013 curriculum. The 2013 curriculum which is often called Kurtila is a competency-based curriculum. Competency-based curriculum is a curriculum designed to help students learn and practice the skills and knowledge covered in the SKL.
Co-Authors Abdul Razak Abdulah Ade Irma Suryani Ade irma suryani Adek Nilasari Harahap Afifah Asra Afnita, Nora Afriani Afriani Afriva Khaidir Agustin Wela Sasih Ahmad Fauzan Ainul Mardiyah, Ainul Ajeng Irani, Hesti Akbar, Amin Al Rafni Al-Qanit Qurba Alchonity Harika Fitri Alvin Gumelar Hanevi Amelia, Denia Ameliana Agustia Ningsih Amran, Asrizal Ali Anggreni Bako anwar, yenita Apaking Basuki Ardi Ardi Ardiana, Elsa Ardipal Ardipal Arina, Novra Ariyani, Reza Arnellis Arnellis Arsilawita, Arsilawita Ashifa, Nurul Asyhari, Hasan Atmazaki Atmazaki Aulia Afza, Aulia Aulia Rahuma Aysi, Rohadatul Ayu Mustika Sari Azizah, Cici Nur Berry Devanda BP, Silvia Anggreni Buchari Nurdin Burhanuddin Burhanuddin Cece Putriani Daharnis Daharnis Darmansyah Delvia Yurmanita Demina Demina Depi Elpina Devi Laura, Rifky Dewi Murni Dewi, Susi Fitria Dian Dwita Indah Sari Diana Besni Dika, Filla Dina Sukma Dinelti Fitria Eka Vidya Putra Ekasyafutra, Ekasyafutra Eldariani, Rahmi Eline Yanty Putri Nasution Elpalina, Srimutia Elvira Petriani Emizal Amri, Emizal Erda Fitriani Erda Fitriani Eri Rozika Erianjoni Erianjoni Etmi Hardi Fadil Rahman Rezhki Fahira, Salsabilla Luthfian Fahmi Kafillah Falma, Fris Okta Fatmariza Fatmariza Fatmariza febraningsih Febraningsih Ferdyan, Rhavy Fernando, Robi Festiyed Firdayani, Mei Bunga Firman Firman Fitri, Rahmadhani Fitrisia, Azmi Frea Purnama Ghani Syuhada Putra Giastituati, Nurhizrah Gunawan, Rilla Gina Gusril, Gusril Gustiati, Nurhizrah Gustiawan, Pandri Hafizah Hafizah Hafizah Hafizah Hafizhah Hamim Nasution Hani Aprida Harahap, Adek Nilasari Harahap, Tinur Rahmawati Harris Effendi Thahar Hasrul Hasrul Hasrul, Hasrul Hasrul Piliang Heldi Heldi, Heldi Helmi Hasan Hendra Hidayat Hendra Naldi hendriani, maifit Henni Muchtar Herdi Setiawan Hertiani, Rahmi Hervi, Fauziah Ideal Putra Idris Idris Ifa Khairun Nisa' Indah Merdisa, Feby Indrawadi, Junaidi Irdhan Epria Darma Putra Irvan Yasman, Muhammad Irwan Irwan Isnarmi Moeis Izaturahmah, Izaturahmah Jalius Jama Jasrial Joesa Yolandari Karmila, Roza Khairani Khairani Khairani Khairani Khurnia Eva Nilasari Kurniawan Kurniawan Lenggogeni, Putri Lesmana, Eka Lianda, Febi Dwi M Roni Marcelina, Lisa MARIA BINTANG Maria Montesori Maria Montesori Maria Montesori Maria Montessori Marzam Marzam Mayuni Pitri, Nazia Meria Ultra Gusteti Meylanie Rahma Fitri Monica Tiara Monica Tiara Montesori, Maria Muhammad Ramez Muhammad Refdinal Muji, Anggarda Paramita Mukhaiyar Mukhaiyar Mukhaiyar Mukhaiyar Mukhaiyar, Mukhaiyar Muktadil Arya Nugraha Mulyana, Fitri Nasution, Hafizhah Hamim Neancy Octavialis Nesti, Tirza Nidya Fitri Nonong Amalita Nora Afnita Noveliani, Dinda Novi Novi Novika Sari, Winda Novriunanda, Dhea Nur Aini Nurhayati Nurhidayati Nurhidayati Nurhizarah Gistituati Nurhizrah Gistituati Nurhizrah Gistituati Nurhizrah Gistituati Nurhizrah Nurhizrah Nurman S Nurman S Nurul Fitri Yani Nurwijayanti Putra, Berkah Adityo Szauli Rahima, Afifa Rahma Julita Rahmi Fauzia Rahmi Putri Rahmi, Rika Rahmi, Tysa Sufia Ramadani, Yori Ramadhan Sumarmin Ramadhani, Nadila Ramadhani, Yulia Rizki Ramadhanty, Suci Prischa Randa, Gia Gusti Ratna Rosima Wulandari Ratna Sari, Rina Reno Fernandes Rhavy Ferdyan Rhomiy Handican Rhona Sandra Ridwan Ridwan Rifmasari, Yessi Rilla Gina Gunawan Riva Darwata, Siti Riza Desriandi Rizal, Putri Syahrani Rizky Ramadhani Romi Mesra Rona Taula Sari, Rona Taula Rosa Fitria Zonti Rozani, Devi Rurisman Rurisman Rusdina Rusdina Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal, Rusdinal Sa'diyah, Halimatun Sabela, Zahra Salsa Billa Salsabila, Vania Sanjaya, Ibnuh Saputra, Andra Saputri, Rahmawati Sari, Vita Monika Sari, Widia Permata Septiani, Depi Siska Nerita SITI FATIMAH Siti Fatimah Siti Fatimah Solly Aryza Sri Mariya Suci Pratiwi Sulaiman Sulaiman Suryanef Suryanef Suryani, M.Pd, Ade Irma Syafri Anwar Syahriani, Fadilla Syamsul Amar B Tika Miranda Asra Tinur Rahmawati Tri Widiyanti, Sukma Tuti Rahmi Ulhasna, Nisa Ulya, Desi Valeri, Muhammad Afrinaldi Vevi Sunarti Vingki Elpani Putri Vini Wela Septiana Wahdina Yola Safitri Wahyudi Saputra Wandi, Joni Indra Widyaliza Fitri Islamy Wienda Gusta Wildawati Wildawati Wita, Gusmira Wiwik Maladerita Wiwik Maladerita Yana, Winda Arma Yeni, Fetri Yenita Anwar Yerizon Yerizon Yolandari, Joesa Yudiana, Yudiana Yufriadi, Ferdi Yuhasnil, Yuhasnil Yulanda, Yola Yulfia Nora Yuli Zarnita Yulia Almira Yulia Rizki Ramadhani Yuliani Fitri Yulianti, Dedek Yulinda Ningsih Yundari, Yundari Yurni Suasti Yurni Suasti Yusman, Ahmad Fauzan Yusna Wenti Yusnanik Bakhtiar yusra, alfajri Yuswin Harputra Z. Mawardi Effendi Zahratul Azizah Zakiy, Maulana Az Zikri, Ahmad Zulhendri Zuwirna Zuwirna Zuwirna