Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
10.125
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar KUMARA CENDEKIA Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia) : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching) International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series Proceedings Education and Language International Conference Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education JURNAL TARBIYAH JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Basicedu Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Jurnal Fundadikdas (Fundamental Pendidikan Dasar) Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs): Conference Series Jurnal Didaktika Dwija Indria Generation Journal Abdi Masyarakat JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika) Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal (Birle Journal) Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika TEACHING : Jurnal Inovasi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Kalam Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan Al-Khidmah Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Pengabdian Inovasi dan Teknologi Kepada Masyarakat Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review Al-Aulia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Jurnal Basicedu Pancaran Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Jurnal Tatsqif EDUCENTER JURNAL PENDIDIKAN Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan ABISATYA: Journal of Community Engagement
Riyadi Riyadi
Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 300 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 300 Documents
Search

 17   18   19   20   21 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PROBLEM POSING PADA POKOK BAHASAN PELUANG DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS XI SMK DI KABUPATEN BOYOLALI Hidayat Bahktiar; Budi Usodo; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of Think Pair Share (TPS) with Problem Posing, Think Pair Share (TPS) or conventional, (2) which one have better in mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (3) in each learning model, which one have better mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (4) in each student’s level of Adversity Quotient which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing, TPS or conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students class XI majors group technology, health and agriculture of SMK in Boyolali. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the documentation of mathematics achievement, questionnaire of Adversity Quotient and test of mathematics achievement. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows: (1) learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than model of TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional, (2) the students having climbers and campers had same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better  achievement than those having quitters, (3) in each learning model, the students having climbers and campers had the same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better achievement than those having quitters, (4) in each Adversity Quotient, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional.Keywords: Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Posing, and Adversity Quotient (AQ)
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KONSEP DIRI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA DI SMP NEGERI E-KABUPATEN BLORA Yekti Putri Kusumaningtyas; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one is better among learning models of Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT) or conventional one in giving mathematics learning achievement, (2) which one is better among students’ levels of self concept, students having high, medium or low self concept in giving mathematics learning achievement. (3) in each learning model, which one is better among students’ levels of self concept in having mathematics learning achievement and (4) in each level of self concept, which one is better among Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT) or conventional model in giving mathematics learning achievement. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Blora. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 309 students; consist of 105 students in the first experimental class, 105 in the second experimental class, and 99 students in control class. The instruments used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and questionnaire of self concept. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it showed that the data had same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It showed that three classes had balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed that: (1) Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) learning models had better achievement than conventional model, Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) learning models had the same mathematics achievement, (2) the students having high self concept had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self concept, the students having medium and low self concept had the same mathematics learning achievement, (3) in each learning model: the students having high self concept had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self concept, the students having medium and low self concept had the same mathematics learning achievement, (4) in each level of self concept: Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) model better learning achievement than conventional model, Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) model had the same good mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT), mathematics learning achievement, and self concept.
Analisis Proses Pembelajaran Matematika Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 pada Materi Pokok Peluang Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Surakarta Adi Wahyu Kuncara; Imam Sujadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of research was to describe the teacher understanding of 2013 curriculum-based learning process and assessment, learning process and assessment based on the 2013 curriculum  in main subject of probability in classroom X SMA Negeri 1 Surakarta. This research used the qualitative method with the case study approach, by deeply studying  the learning activities so as to describe the learning process taking place in the mathematics learning, especially the material of probability. The subject of research was mathematics teacher of the tenth grade of SMA Negeri 1 Surakarta with the criterion of having attended the training about 2013 curriculum. The data in this study were: (i) teacher’s understanding of the learning and assessment process based on  2013 curriculum (ii) mathematics learning process that imparting knowledge, attitudes, and skills with scientific approach (iii) the assessment process of knowledge, attitudes, and skills. Step analysis of the data in the study carried out in three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and withdrawal conclusion. The results of this study are as follows. (i) The learning process in curriculum 2013 was centered on the students, and the teacher merely functions as a facilitator. In addition, the learning process was not the only aspect of the knowledge imparted to students but the learning process in 2013 curriculum inculcate attitudes and skills aspects as well. According to teacher, assessment process using the aspects of knowledge, it can be a matter of testing and instrument description, aspects of attitude by observing and instrument in the form of sheets of observations, as well as aspects of skills with the practice tests or portfolios and instrument in the form of a rubric. (ii) Observed activities carried out by asking the students to listen to the explanation given by the teachers. The questioning activities carried out by asking questions to the students related to the material being studied. Information gathering activities that occur are students reading books and worksheets to answer the question or questions given by teacher. In this information gathering activities of teachers instill active attitude to the students. Inform process activities occur that students use information obtained from books and worksheets to answer the questions given by the teacher. On inform process activities, teachers inculcate cooperation and responsibility to the students. Communicated activities carried out by asking students to write the results of group discussions in class. (iii) Knowledge assessment process conducted by giving a quiz to the student at the end of learning and the instrument that is used in the form of a description. The attitude assessment process was carried out during the learning process. Teachers assess students attitudes to the observation technique. Skills assessment process were carried out during the learning process. Teachers assess students skills when communicating with the activities of the students and see the results of the discussion by looking at the results of the quiz given to students.Keywords : mathematics learning process, scientific approach, assessment process, curriculum 2013
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA BERORIENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS) PADA MATERI TURUNAN UNTUK SISWA KELAS IX IPA PROGRAM AKSELERASI Sumanah Sumanah; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this study were: (1) to develop a valid mathematics learning set which is oriented to Creative Problem Solving (CPS) learning model in the topic of derivative on  XI Acceleration grade, and (2) to determine which learning model produces better learning achievement,  the developing CPS or the conventional model in the topic of derivative on XI Acceleration grade. The development of learning set in this study were observed from five aspects, they are: (1) the expert's validity, (2) the students' activity, (3) the teacher's capability in managing teaching and learning process, (4) the students' response to the learning process, and (5) the students' mathematics learning  achievement. This study was a development study of learning set done by applying a modified 4-D Thiagarajan model. There were three phases involved in this study; i.e. defining, designing, and developing. The subjects of the study were the students of SMA N 1 Pati grade XI acceleration year 2013/2014 as the experiment class and the students of SMA 1 Kudus grade XI acceleration year 2013/2014 as the control class. The data was collected by using validation sheet of learning set, observation sheet of teacher's capability in managing teaching and learning process, observation sheet of students' activity, students'response questionnaire, and test of students' learning achievement. Data analysis was done by descriptive and inferential statistics. The learning set produced is valid, because it has been validated with high score, that is 4.41 and after finishing the experiment, the results fulfill the pre-requirements, defined as follows: it leads to productive students' activity with average score of 4,25 having a positive effect, teacher's capability in managing teaching and learning process is very good with the score above 4,20, students' response toward the teaching and learning process is positive with the precentage above 80%, and learning achievement test is proven to be valid, reliable. Moreover, the teaching and learning process with CPS model with developing learning set is effective, because the experiment showed that the average score of learning achievement of the student is better than the conventional model.Keywords : Creative Problem Solving (CPS), The learning  set
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK TALK WRITE DAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DISERTAI STRATEGI PETA KONSEP PADA MATERI BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI GAYA BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS VII SMPN Se-KOTA METRO LAMPUNG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Nur Syarifah Fitriani; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to know: (1) which one of the learning models with scientific approach gave a better achievement between TTW-Concept Mapping, NHT- Concept Mapping, or classical, (2) which one of the students with thinking style had a better achievement between students with concrete sequential, abstract sequential, concrete random, or abstract random, (3) at each of learning models with scientific approach, which one of the students with thinking style had a better achievement between students with sequential concrete, sequential abstract, concrete random, or abstract random, (4) at each thinking style, which one of learning models with scientific approach gave a better achievement between TTW-Concept Mapping, NHT- Concept Mapping, or classical. Population of the research was the seventh class students of Junior High School at Metro city on academic year 2014/2015. Instrument used to gather data were mathematics achievement test and thinking style questionnaire. Data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the data analysis, it was concluded as follows. 1) TTW-CM gave better achievement than NHT-CM, NHT-CM gave better achievement than classical, 2) Students with concrete sequential had better achievement than students with abstract sequential, concrete random, and abstract random, students with abstract sequential gave the same achievement with concrete random, and abstract random, student with concrete random gave the same achievement with abstract random, 3) In each learning models, student with concrete sequential had better achievement than students with abstract sequential, concrete random, and abstract random. Students with abstract sequential had better achievement than students with concrete random, and abstract random, the student with concrete random gave the same achievement with abstract random, 4) In each of thinking style, students who was subject to TTW-CM models gave better achievement than NHT-CM, NHT-CM gave better achievement than classical.Keywords: Think Talk Write, Numbered Head Together, Thinking Style, Achievement. 
KREATIVITAS DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH GEOMETRI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMPN 1 ARJOSARI KABUPATEN PACITAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF DAN GENDER Ariska Yuliana Putri; Riyadi Riyadi; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to describe male and female students creativity of class VIII SMPN 1 Arjosari District of Pacitan that has a Field Dependent and Field Independent cognitive style in solving space geometric problem. This was a qualitative research. These subjects were taken using purposive sampling and snowball sampling. The subjects of this research were the students in the eight grade of SMPN 1 Arjosari. Data collection techniques in this research were GEFT, creativity test and interview. Techniques to validate the data were time triangulation. The data analysis technique used was the concept of Miles and Huberman consisted of data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The aspect of creativity in this research were consists of  four aspects, there were fluency,  flexibility, originality and elaboration. Students less creative if they do not meet the four aspects of creativity, quite creative if they meet one, two and three aspects of creativity and creative if they meet the four aspects of creativity. The results showed that male students that have Field Dependent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet one of the creativity aspects which is fluency. The male students that have Field Independent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet two creativity aspects which are fluency and elaboration. The female students that have Field Dependent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet two creativity aspects which are fluency and elaboration. The female students that have Field Independent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet three creativity aspects which are fluency, flexibility and elaboration. So the male and female students that have Field Dependent and Field Independent have a quite creative but it are different in each aspect of creativity.Keywords: creativity, problem solving, cognitive style, gender.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DAN THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN QUANTUM LEARNING DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MATEMATIS LOGIS SISWA SMP SE-KABUPATEN MAGELANG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Tanti Listiani; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning models on learning achievement viewed from the logical mathematical intelligence of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type modified with Quantum Learning and scientific approach, Think Pair Share (TPS) type with Quantum Learning and scientific approach, and classical model with scientific approach. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental research with a 3×3 factorial design. The population was all of students on grade VIII of Junior High Schools in Magelang Regency in academic year 2014/2015. The data was analyzed by using two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. Based on the hypothesis, the results of the study could be summarized as follows. (1) NHT-Quantum Learning gave better achievement than TPS-Quantum Learning and classical model, TPS-Quantum Learning had same achievement as classical model. (2) Students with high logical mathematical intelligence gave better achievement than middle and low logical mathematical intelligence, students who had middle logical mathematical intelligence gave better achievement than those who had low logical mathematical intelligence. (3) In each category of the logical mathematical intelligence, NHT-Quantum Learning gave better achievement than TPS-Quantum Learning and classical model, TPS-Quantum Learning had same achievement as classical model. (4) In each of the learning models, the students who had high logical mathematical intelligence got better achievement than middle and low logical mathematical intelligence, the students who had middle logical mathematical intelligence got better achievement than those who had low logical mathematical intelligence.Keywords: Numbered Heads Together, Think Pair Share, Classical, Quantum Learning, Logical Mathematical Intelligence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN RESOURCE BASED LEARNING (RBL)DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL)DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIK PESERTA DIDIK KELAS XI SMA SEKABUPATEN KUDUS TAHUN 2013/2014 Arifa Apriliana; Riyadi Riyadi; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the students mathematical communication skills. The learning models compared were RBL, PBL and Direct learning model. Data analysis techniques used to test the hypothesis was two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of the research were as follows. 1) RBL and PBL learning models have produced the same mathematics achievement, but RBL and PBL learning models have produced the mathematics learning achievement better than Direct Learning. 2) learners who have high and medium mathematical communication skills have had the same mathematics achievement, and learners with medium and low mathematical communication skills also have the same mathematics achievement. But, learners with high mathematical communication skills have had a better mathematical achievement than learners with low mathematical communication skills. 3) learners with high mathematical communication skills who are learning by using RBL, PBL, and Direct learning model have had the same mathematics achievement. Learners with medium mathematical communication skills who are learning by using RBL, PBL, and Direct learning model also have had the same mathematics achievement. Learners with low mathematical communication skills who are learning by using RBL and PBL have had the same mathematics achievement, and who are learning by using PBL and Direct learning model also have had the same mathematics achievement, but learners with low mathematical communication skills who are learning by using RBL have had a better mathematical achievement than who are learning by using  Direct learning model. 4) In the RBL learning model, learners who have high, medium and low mathematical communication skills have had the same mathematics achievement. In the PBL learning model, learners who have high, medium and low mathematical communication skills also have had the same mathematics achievement. In the Direct learning model, learners who have high and medium mathematical communication skills have had the same mathematics achievement, and in the Direct learning model, learners who have medium and low mathematical communication skills also have had the same mathematics achievement, but in the Direct learning model, learners who have high mathematical communication skills have had a better mathematical achievement than learners with low mathematical communication skills.Keywords: Learning model, RBL, PBL, Direct learning model, Mathematical communication skills, and Mathematics achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA MATERI SEGITIGA DAN SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN TULANG BAWANG BARAT Irma Ayuwanti; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of the research  were to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, NHT, GI or direct learning model, (2) which one having better mathematics learning achievement, students with climbers, campers or quitters AQ, (3) in each learning models (NHT, GI and direct) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, climbers, campers or quitters AQ, (4) in each student AQ (climbers, campers, and quitters) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, NHT, GI or direct learning  model.This study was a quasi-experimental research. The research design used was a 3x3 factorial design. The population of research was all VII graders of Junior High Schools throughout West Tulang Bawang Regency in the school year of 2014/2015. Meanwhile the sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The sample consisted of 281 students: 93 students for experiment I class, 93 for experiment II class and 95 for control class. The instruments used to collect the data were learning AQ questionnaire and  mathematics learning achievement test. From the result of research, it could be concluded as follows: (1) NHT learning model provided mathematics learning achievement better than GI learning model and direct learning model, GI learning model provided mathematics learning achievement better than direct learning model. (2) The learning achievement of the students with climbers AQ was better than that of those with campers and quitters AQ, and the learning achievement of the students with campers AQ was better than that of those with quitters AQ. (3) In NHT learning model, students with climbers and campers AQ had the same achievement, students with climbers  and campers AQ had better achievement than students with quitters AQ; qqqin GI learning model, students with climbers and campers AQ had the same achievement, students with climbers AQ categories had better achievement than students with quitters AQ, students with campers and quitters AQ had the same achievement; in direct learning model, students with climbers, campers and quitters AQ had the same achievement. (4) In climbers AQ, NHT learning modelqqq gave the same achievement as GI learning model, NHT learning model gave better achievement than in direct learning model, GI learning model gave the same achievement as direct learning model; in campers AQ, NHT learning model gave the same achievement as GI learning model, NHT learning model gave better achievement than in direct learning model, GI learning model gave the same achievement as direct learning model; in quitters AQ, NHT, GI and direct learning model gave the same achievement. Keywords: NHT, GI, Direct Learning, and Adversity Quotient (AQ).
ANALISIS PROSES DAN TINGKAT BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA SMP DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH BENTUK SOAL CERITA MATERI LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN MATEMATIKA Isnaeni Umi Machromah; Riyadi Riyadi; Budi Usodo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to analyze the process and level of creative thinking of junior high school students based on mathematics anxiety’s students. The subjects of this research were taken by using purposive sampling. The Subjects of this research were six 9th grade students of SMP N 3 Colomadu Karanganyar regency. The data were collected by questionnaire and task-based interview technique and validated by using time triangulation. The data were analyzed by collection, reduction, presentation, and conclusion. The results of this research were: (1) students with high mathematics anxiety had level 1 (almost not creative) and the processes were at preparation stage, students feel difficult to understand and identify the problem; at the incubation stage, students found the idea from picture’s observation; at illumination stage, students could not  make mathematics statement based on the problem enough; at verification stage, students read or counted again for investigating the answer and they could resume the result appropriate the reality of the problem, (2) students with medium mathematics anxiety had level 1 (almost not creative) and level 2 (quite creative), and the processes were at preparation stage, students could understand and identify the problem well; at the incubation stage, students found the idea from picture’s observation; at illumination stage, students could make mathematics statement based on the problem well; at verification stage, students counted again for investigating the answer and they could resume the result appropriate the reality of the problem, (3) students with low mathematics anxiety had level 2 (quite creative), and the processes were at preparation stage, students could understand and identify the problem so well; at the incubation stage, students found the idea from picture’s observation and from the knowledge before; at illumination stage, students could make mathematics statement based on the problem so well; at verification stage, students counted again for investigating the answer and they could resume the result appropriate the reality of the problem.Keywords: creative thinking processes; creative thinking level; word problem solving; mathematics anxiety. 
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Hidayat Abdul Razak Abdul Razak Abi Fadila Achmad Ridwan, Achmad Adeyanto, Rizki Adi Wahyu Kuncara Agus Suprijono Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Syawaludin Ahmad, Ahmad Aisyah Senja Mustika Aji Permana Putra Alfonsa Maria Sofia Hapsari Ali Fakhrudin Ali Fakhrudin, Ali Amiratih Siti Aisyah Andriawan Nurcahyo, Andriawan Anesa Surya Anggraheni Marsella Bella Astuti Anggreini, Dewi Anis Hanafiah Anita Dewi Utami Anna Setyowati Anna Setyowati Annisa Ayu Kuserawati Annisa Fatiah Ardiantoro, Gigih Ardiyani, Shila Majid Arifa Apriliana Arifa Apriliana, Arifa Arinta Rara Kirana Ariska Yuliana Putri Ariska Yuliana Putri Arsa’ad Kurniadi Arsa’ad Kurniadi Arum Dwi Rahmawati Dwi Rahmawati, Arum Dwi Rahmawati Dwi Arumingtyas, Pramesti Asih Duwi Mawartini Aslam Aslam, Aslam Asrowi Asrowi Asy’ari Asy’ari Asy’ari, Asy’ari Asyraf, Asyraf Atik Wahyuni Aulia Musla Mustika Aulia Musla Mustika author Ari Suningsih Awaluddin Tjalla Aziza, Luthfita Bayu Kurniawan, Sandra Berti Dyah Permatasari Broto Apriliyanto Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Burhan Mustaqim Chumdari Chumdari, Chumdari CORRY LIANA Darmono, Prasetiyo Budi Desy Nur Wulandari Desy Nur Wulandary Dewi Ariyanti Dewi Kurniasari, Dewi Dewi Rahmawati Noer Jannah Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Diana Tri Purnamasari Diari Indriati Dita Qondiyana Djumaliningsih, Nosa Putri Dwi Isna Wardani Dwi Yuni Pramugarini Dwiani Listya Kartika Dwiani Listya Kartika, Dwiani Listya Dyah Susilawati E.P.U, Moertiningsih Edi Irawan Edi Irawan Edi Irawan Edi Irawan Edi Irawan Eka Agustina Khairunnisa Eka Nur Azizah Eka Nur Azizah Endah Asmarawati, Endah Endah Wulantina, Endah Endang Sri Handayani ERLAN SISWANDI Erni Susanti Ersam Mahendrawan Evi Novitasari Fadhilah, Miming Farah Heniati Santosa Farah Heniati Santosa, Farah Heniati Fatir, Fatir Fika Widya Pratama Firna Irnistisia Fitri Andika Nurussafa’at, Fitri Andika Fitri Andika Nurussafa’at Fitriani, Nur Syarifah Fransiska Januarti Gusman Gatut Iswahyudi Gesti Ayu Diah Asera Gigih Ardiantoro Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi, Gunarhadi Guritno Ari Wibowo Guritno Ari Wibowo Hadi Mulyono Hadiyah Hadiyah Hadiyah Hadiyah Halimah Halimah Hanafiah, Anis Hapsari, Alfonsa Maria Sofia Hartono Hartono Hartono Hartono Hartono, Edy Hasan Mahfud Hasanah, A.K Uswatun Hendrayanto, Dhani Nur Hesa Resti Arumanda Hesti Yuni Ayu Lestari Hidayat Bahktiar Hidayat Bahktiar, Hidayat Hidayat, Edisut Taufik Hidayat, Edisut Taufik Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh I.R. Widianto Atmojo Ibnu Sadono Idam Ragil Widianto Atmojo Idam Ragil Widianto Atmojo Ikhsan Abdul Latif Ikrar Pramudya Ikrar Pramudya Ikrar Pramudya, Ikrar Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Imam Wijaya, Henry Putra Indah Slamet Budiarti Indar Diasmi Aulianisa Indriana Dewi Irawan, Edi Irma Ayuwanti Irma Ayuwanti Irnistisia, Firna Isnaeni Umi Machromah Iswahyudi, Gatut Iswanti, Partia Iva Sarifah Ivana Ivana Ivana Izzatul Fajriyah, Izzatul Joko Daryanto Joko Daryanto Joko Susilo Juitaning Mustika Juliana Nasution Justiarani, Justiarani Karsono Karsono Kartika Chrysti Suryandari Kartono , Kuncara, Adi Wahyu Kurniasari Elsya Rosyana Kurniasari, Dewi Kurniawan, Sandra Bayu Kurniawati, Rina Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kusuma, Elisabet Dyah Lenny Puspita Dewi Lestari, Hesti Yuni Ayu Lies Lestari Lies Lestari Lina Utami Lis Maryani Listyaputri, Dinar Rizky Luthfiana Mirati, Luthfiana Luthfiyah Nanda Bertha Armelia M Ismail Sriyanto M Ismail Sriyanto M Ismail Sriyono M. Ismail Sriyanto M. Ismail Sriyanto Madani , Faisal Maghfiroh Yanuarti Maghfiroh Yanuarti Mania Roswitha Mania Roswitha Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Masriani . Matsuri Matsuri Matsuri, Matsuri Maya Novita Sari Merrydian, Siska Miftachudin Miftachudin Miftachudin, Miftachudin Miftah Hur Rahman Zh Moertiningsih E.P.U Mufarrihah, Iftitaahul Muhamad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Gazali Muhammad Gazali Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Syarif Hidayatussalam Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyaningrum Lestari, Mulyaningrum Musrika, Musrika Mustika, Aisyah Senja Najmul Laila Nia Apriyanti Niendya Ashiefa Parahita Nina Nurmasari Nina Nurmasari Nindya Ashiefa Parahita Ningroom, Rita Arfi Astuti Nok Yeni Heryaningsih Nok Yeni Heryaningsih, Nok Yeni Noor Hidayati Noor Hidayati Nosa Putri Djumaliningsih Novita Dwi Ashohib Noviyanti, Ika Nurma Nur Ainsah H. Saleh Nur Insani Nur Syarifah Fitriani Nuraini Muhassanah Nurudin, M. Nurul Amalia K W Nurul Amalia K W Nyoto Nyoto Nyoto Nyoto, Nyoto Oka Tamaraningtyas Patrisius Afrisno Udil, Patrisius Afrisno Peduk Rintayati Prabowo, Haniftia Haqqiendini Pratama, Riska Widya Pratiwi, Rani Prestanti Hayuningtyas Priyogo, Adi Puji Ayuni Puji Ayuni Rany Widyastuti Rejeki, Suprapti Rima Aksen Cahdriyana Rima Aksen Cahdriyana Rina Kurniawati Rini, Indah Mustika Rintayati, Peduk Risbiyantoro, Hendro Riska Widya Pratama Riswandha, Septian Henry Rizki Adeyanto Rizky L, Dinar Rizqi Aditya Nugraha Rokimin, Rokimin Rosyida, Entyka Mayhasti S Retnowati S Siswanto S Subanti Sajidan Sajidan Salmianti, Salmianti Samsi Suryanjani Sandi Sandi Sandra Bayu Kurniawan Saputri, Alinggi Nindi Saputri, Dwi Yuniasih Saputri, Rose Andriyani Selvi Marcellia Septi Triyani Septi Triyani SEPTINA ALRIANINGRUM Sherly Mayfana Panglipur Yekti Shila Majid Ardiyani Shila Majid Ardiyani Sigit Pamungkas Sigit Pamungkas Sigit Rimbatmojo Siswanto Siswanto Siswanto Siswanto Siti Kamsiyati Siti Kamsiyati Siti Kamsiyati Siti Kamsiyati Siti Komsatun Slamet Riyadi Sonny Ari Wibowo Sri Hartati Ningsih Sri Hartati Ningsih Sri Mardani Sri Marmoah Sri Mastuti Sri Subanti Sri Yamtinah Sriyati, Sriyati Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Sugeng Priyanto, Sugeng Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Sujadi, Imam Sujadi, Imam Sukarmin Sulaiman Sulaiman Sumanah Sumanah Sumanah Sumanah Suprapti Rejeki Susilawati, Dyah Syam, Aldo Redho Syamsul Arifin Syarifah, Triana Jamilatus T A Kusmayadi T Dwi Hastuti Tambunan, Rifka Paulina Tanti Listiani Tanti Listiani, Tanti Tarmo Tarmo Tarmo, Tarmo Titik Yuniarti Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Silaningsih Tri Silaningsih Triana Jamilatus Syarifah Triyanto . Triyanto . Triyanto . Triyanto Triyanto Triyanto, Triyanto Tunggu Biyarti Twiningsih, Anik Tyas, Wahyu Handining Ulfa Masamah Ulfa Masamah, Ulfa Ummi Rosyidah Ummi Rosyidah, Ummi V Kartikaningtyas Veronika Yusnita Andriani Prastika Via Yustitia Vita Purnamasari Vivi Fenty Anggraeny Vivi Fenty Anggraeny Wahyu Prihatiningrum Wahyu Prihatiningrum Wahyumiarti Wahyumiarti, Wahyumiarti Wardani Rahayu Wibowo, Sonny Ari Widodo Widodo Yekti Putri Kusumaningtyas Yekti Putri Kusumaningtyas Yogi Bagus Dwi Cahyono Yuliana Yuliana Yulianti Yulianti Yulianti Yulianti Yuniarti, Titik Zara Mertiana RZ Zara Mertiana RZ Zulfa, Faradina Nilam