Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
10.125
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar KUMARA CENDEKIA Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia) : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching) International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series Proceedings Education and Language International Conference Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education JURNAL TARBIYAH JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Basicedu Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Jurnal Fundadikdas (Fundamental Pendidikan Dasar) Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs): Conference Series Jurnal Didaktika Dwija Indria Generation Journal Abdi Masyarakat JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika) Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal (Birle Journal) Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika TEACHING : Jurnal Inovasi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Kalam Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan Al-Khidmah Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Pengabdian Inovasi dan Teknologi Kepada Masyarakat Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review Al-Aulia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Jurnal Basicedu Pancaran Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Jurnal Tatsqif EDUCENTER JURNAL PENDIDIKAN Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan ABISATYA: Journal of Community Engagement
Riyadi Riyadi
Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 300 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 300 Documents
Search

 18   19   20   21   22 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM POSING DAN PROBLEM SOLVING PADA MATERI TRIGONOMETRI DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS PESERTA DIDIK KELAS XI IPA SMA SE-KABUPATEN KUDUS TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Sugihardjo Sugihardjo; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement and learning interest viewed from the students creativity. The learning model compared were problem posing, problem solving and direct instruction. The type of the research was a quasi experimental research with factorial design 3 x 3. The population was the students of senior high school in Kudus regency on academic year 2013/2014. The size of the sample was 278 learnes consisted of 98 students in the first experimental class, 81 students in the second experimental class and 99 students in the control class. The instrument used were mathemathics achievement test and questioner. The data was analyzed using analysis variance of two ways with unbalanced of cell. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Problem solving model has better learning achievement than problem posing and direct instruction. Students who were taught by problem posing has better learning achievement than direct instruction, (2) Students who have high learning creativity have the same learning achievement as students who have the medium creativity. Students who have high learning creativity have better learning achievement than students who have low creativity. Students who have medium learning creativity have the same learning achievement as students who have low creativity, (3) Students having high and low creativity that used problem posing, problem solving, and direct instructional model have the same achievement. While students having medium creativity that used problem solving model have better achievement than students that used direct instructional model, but students that used problem posing and problem solving model have the same achievement, and the students that used problem posing and direct instructional model have the same achievement, (4) In each category of learning model, students with high creativity, medium and low have the same learning achievement. Key Words: Problem Posing, Problem Solving, Direct Instruction, Learning Creativity
REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VII DI SMP N 9 YOGYAKARTA DALAM MEMBANGUN KONSEP SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL Rima Aksen Cahdriyana; Imam Sujadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to describe the preference of using of mathematical representations form of the seventh grade students of SMP 9 Yogyakarta who have high ability in developing the concept of a Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables (SLETV) and describing the characteristics of the use of such mathematical representations form. This research was categorized as a qualitative case study approach. The subjects of this study were 6 (six) students of seventh grade of SMP Negeri 9 Yogyakarta who have high ability. Data in this study were the use of mathematical representation forms in developing concepts of SLETV that obtained from observation and interview-based tasks. The data were analyzed into three categories of SLETV developing concepts: 1) stating SLETV definition and SLETV’s solution definition; 2) using the concept SLETV in everyday life; and 3) solving the problem of SLETV. The use of students’ mathematical representation that includes a symbolic representation, a verbal representation, and a visual representation were be seen by each category. The validity of the data being used in this study was triangulation time, through the first observational data and task-based interview, and the second observational data and task-based interviews. The same consistent data were categorized as valid data that illustrate the use of students’ mathematical representation in developing  concepts of SLETV. The results of this study are as follows. 1) The preference of the use of students’ representation forms in stating SLETV definition and solution sets by using verbal representation. Characteristics of using this representation are by mentioning SLETV’ characteristics (for SLETV definition), and by mentioning the characteristics SLETV solution (for solution sets); 2) Preference of the use of students representation forms in using SLETV concept in the daily life is by using symbolic representation. The characteristics of the use of representation are: a) by changing the description of the conditions that are known to be an equation form; b) by making a conjecture to find the right answer; c) by clarifying the rightness of the conjecture that has been made to determine the correct answer; d) by performing algebra arithmetic operations, and arithmetic operations to determine the right answer. 3) The preference of the use of students’ representation forms in finishing SLETV problem is by using  symbolic representation. The characteristics of using this representation are: a) by changing the shape that was known as an equation form; b) by manipulating the form of the equations that have been made to get the right answer easier; c) by making a conjecture to find the right answer; d) by clarifying the rightness of the conjecture that has been made to determine the correct answer; e) by doing algebra arithmetic operations and arithmetic operations to determine the right answer.Keywords : Developing  of concepts, Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables (SLETV), mathematical representation.
ANALISIS KETERAMPILAN GEOMETRI SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH GEOMETRI BERDASARKAN TINGKAT BERPIKIR VAN HIELE Nuraini Muhassanah; Imam Sujadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract:The objective of this research was to describe the VIII grade students geometry skills atSMP N 16 Surakarta in the level 0 (visualization), level 1 (analysis), and level 2 (informaldeduction) van Hiele level of thinking in solving the geometry problem. This research was aqualitative research in the form of case study analyzing deeply the students geometry skill insolving the geometry problem based on van Hiele level of thingking. The subject of this researchwas nine students of VIII grade at SMP N 16 Surakarta consisted of three students of level 0(visualization), three students of level 1 (analysis), and three students of level 2 (informaldeduction) obtained from clustering technic. The data in this research was the characteristics ofgeometry skills obtained from the recording script of the interview done twice for the sake oftriangulation. The result of this research was the geometry skills of students in solving thegeometry problem. Students of level 0 (visualization) at the visual skill can define the square basedon the shape appearance; descriptive skill, can group the right name of the pictures given; drawingskill, can draw the square by labeling the certain parts; logical skill, can understand theconservation of the square picture in any position and realize the similarity from some pictures ofsquare; and application skill, can correlate the given information (physical object) and develop itinto geometry model as well as explain the characteristics of geometry from the physicalappearance. Then, the syudents of level 1 (analysis) at the visual skill, can explain thecharacteristics of the picture; descriptive skill, can define the square based on the characteristics;drawing skill, can construct the picture based on the given characteristics (verbal information) anddraw draw the other square; logical skill can mention the differences of squares and realize that thecharacteristics of square can be used to differentiate kinds of square; and application skill, can usethe geometry model in solving the problem. Next, the students of level 2 (informal deduction) atvisual skill, can admit the relation from any kinds of square by admitting the general characteristic;descriptive skill, can create the sentences showing the relation among the square based on thegeneral characteristics; drawing skill, can draw other square from the given square and explain thecharacteristics; logical skill, can use the characteristics of a square to decide a class of squarewhich is in the other kinds of square; and application skill, can use the model concept ofmathematic representing the relation among the objects.Key words: geometry kill, van Hiele level of thinking, problem solving, and geometry.
ANALISIS KESALAHAN DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL CERITA PADA MATERI LUAS PERMUKAAN BANGUN RUANG BERDASARKAN NEWMAN’S ERROR ANALYSIS (NEA) DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL Mulyadi Mulyadi; Riyadi Riyadi; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: Newman’s Error Analysis (NEA) is a method to analyze the error occurring in the students. One of the main factors which causes the weakness of the students comprehension toward polyhedral material is spatial ability. This study aims at describing  error occurred in the students based on NEA viewed from spatial ability. The information of that error occurence can be used as a means of consideration in deciding the appropiate lesson plan. This study was a descriptive qualitative research with case study method. The subjects of research were the semester VIII  graders  of  SMPN  2  Kebonagung  in academic year of 2013/2014, there were 12 students who have hight spatial ability, 11 students who have medium spatial ability and 11 students who have low spatial ability. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. The data were taken from the result of error diagnostic test which was followed by Certainly of Response Index (CRI) scores, spatial test and interview. The validity of data used triangulation techniques. The data was analyzed by using Miles and Huberman’s model. The result of research showed that based on NEA in the subject of hight spatial ability was 4,65% reading error, 13,95% comprehension error, 27,91% transformation error, 25,58% process skill error and 27,91% encoding  error. Medium spatial ability subjects obtain 2,94% reading error, 2,94% comprehension error, 32,35% transformation error, 29,41% process skill error and 32,35% encoding error. Subjects of low spatial ability obtain 3,03% reading error, 9,09% comprehension error, 30,30% transformation error, 27,27% process skill error and 30,30% encoding error. The errors are mainly made by the subjects because of the concept incomprehensibility, then misconception and the lowest one is the subjects comprehend the concept but they are careless in doing the assignment.Keyword: error, NEA, concept incomprehensibility, misconception, comprehend the concept 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GI DAN NHT DALAM LC7E TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DAN MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT Wahyu Prihatiningrum; Budiyono Budiyono; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract : The aim of this research was to determine the effect of learning models toward the learning achievement in Mathematics and the achievement motivation viewed from the Adversity Quotient (AQ). The learning models compared were Cooperative Learning Model of Group Investigation (GI) Type and Numbered Head Together (NHT) Type in Learning Cycle 7E (LC7E). This research used the quasi experimental research method. Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Sukoharjo. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples consisted of 214 students, and they were divided into two groups, 107 students in Experimental Class 1 and 107 in Experimental Class 2. The instruments used for gathering the data of the research were test of achievement in Mathematics learning, questionnaire of achievement motivation, and AQ measurement tool. The data was analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance. The results of the research show that: (1) the students exposed to the NHT in LC7E have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than GI in LC7E; (2) the students exposed to the NHT in LC7E have a better achievement motivation than GI in LC7E; (3) the students with AQ of the climbers type have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those the campers or quitters type, and the students with AQ of the campers type have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those the quitters type; (4) the students with AQ of the climbers type have a better achievement motivation than the campers or quitters type, and the students with AQ of the campers type have a better achievement motivation than those the quitters type; (5) in each learning model, either in the NHT in LC7E or GI in LC7E, the students with AQ of the climbers type have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those the campers or quitters type, and the students with AQ of the campers type have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those the quitters type; (6) in each learning model, either the NHT in LC7E or the GI in LC7E, the students with AQ of the climbers type have a better achievement motivation than those the campers or quitters type, and the students with AQ of the campers type have a better achievement motivation than those the quitters type; (7) in each type of the AQ, either the quitters, campers, or climbers, the students exposed to the NHT in LC7E have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than GI in LC7E; and (8) in each type of the AQ, either the quitters, campers, or climbers, the students exposed to the NHT in LC7E have a better achievement motivation than GI in LC7E.Keywords:      NHT, GI, learning cycle, adversity quotient, and achievement motivation.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (RME) DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP/MTs DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN Nyoto Nyoto; Budi Usodo; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which one had a better mathematics achievement, students instructed with the cooperative learning of Think Pair Share (TPS) type with Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach, the cooperative learning of TPS type, or the direct learning model; (2) which one had a better mathematics achievement, students who had visual learning style, auditorial learning style, or kinesthetic learning style; (3) on each type of learning model, which one had a better mathematics achievement, students who had visual learning style, auditorial learning style, or kinesthetic learning style; (4) on each learning style, which one had a better mathematics achievement, students instructed with the cooperative learning of TPS type with Realistic Mathematics Education approach, the cooperative learning of TPS type, or the direct learning model. This research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of the grade VIII State Junior High Schools/Islamic State Junior Secondary School in Sragen Regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample consisted of 308 students. The instrument used to collect data was mathematics achievement test and questionnaire of students learning style. Balance test used unbalanced one way analysis of variance. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded as follows. (1) Students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach had the same mathematics achievement as students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type. Students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach and the cooperative learning model of TPS type had better mathematics achievement than students intructed with the direct learning model. (2) Students with visual learning style had the same mathematics achievement as students with auditorial learning style. Students with visual learning style had better mathematics achievement than student with kinesthetic learning style, and students with auditorial learning style had the same mathematics achievement as students with kinesthetic learning style. (3) On the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach, the cooperative learning model of TPS type, and the direct learning model, students with visual learning style had the same mathematics achievement as students with auditorial learning style. Students with visual learning style had better mathematics achievement than student with kinesthetic learning style, and students with auditorial learning style had the same mathematics achievement as students with kinesthetic learning style. (4) On students with visual learning style, auditorial learning style, and kinesthetic learning style, students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach had the same mathematics achievement as students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type. Students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach and the cooperative learning model of TPS type had better mathematics achievement than students intructed with the direct learning model.Keywords: TPS, RME, students learning style
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DENGAN PETA KONSEP PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN KUADRAT DITINJAU DARI SIKAP ILMIAH PESERTA DIDIK KELAS X SMA DI KABUPATEN KUDUS TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Endang Sri Handayani; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cooperative learning model Jigsaw with the concept map, cooperative learning model Jigsaw without a concept map, and the direct instruction model with a review of the scientific attitude of students towards learning achievement. This type of research was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial designs. This research was implemented in the month of September 2013 to November 2013. The X grade students of Senior High School in Kudus Regency with 2013/2014 academic year was the population of this research. The instrument used to collect the data were UAN, scientific attitude questionnaire, and mathematics achievement tests with the topic of quadratic equation in the form of multiple choice. Test requirements include test data analysis used Lilliefors test for normality and homogeneity test used the Bartlett test. Analysis of the data used two-way variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusion of this study were: (1) cooperative learning model Jigsaw with the concept map has better mathematics learning achievement than the cooperative learning model Jigsaw without a concept map and the direct instruction model, the cooperative learning model Jigsaw without a concept map has mathematics learning achievement as good as the direct instruction model; (2) the high scientific attitude students have better mathematics learning achievement than the medium and low  scientific attitude students, the medium scientific attitude student have mathematics learning achievement as good as the low scientific attitude students; (3) there is no interaction between learning model to the level of scientific attitude of students towards mathematics learning achievement; (4) there is no difference between the learning achievement of students in each level of the scientific attitude for each learning model.Keywords: cooperative learning model , Jigsaw , concept maps , scientific attitude
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) PADA MATERI KUBUS DAN BALOK DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIKA PESERTA DIDIK SMP NEGERI KELAS VIII SE-KOTA METRO Ummi Rosyidah; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of the research were to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement the cooperative learning model of the jigsaw type, TGT or direct learning model, (2) in the student mathematical reasoning abilities, which one having better mathematics learning achievement, the students with the high, moderate or low mathematical reasoning abilities, (3) in each learning models (jigsaw, TGT or direct learning model) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the students with the high, moderate or low mathematical reasoning abilities, (4) in each student mathematical reasoning abilities (high, moderate, or low) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the cooperative learning model of the jigsaw type, TGT, and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools in Metro City. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 243 students. The instruments to collect the data were test of Mathematics learning achievement and test of achievement in mathematical reasoning abilities. Technique of analyzing data that used was unbalanced two way analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of the jigsaw type results better Mathematics learning achievement than the cooperative learning model of the TGT type and the direct learning model, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type results better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model. 2) The students with the high mathematical reasoning abilities have better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate mathematical reasoning abilities and those with the low mathematical reasoning abilities, the students with the moderate mathematical reasoning abilities have better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low mathematical reasoning abilities. 3) In the cooperative learning model of the jigsaw type and TGT, the students with the high mathematical reasoning abilities have same achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate mathematical reasoning abilities and those with the low mathematical reasoning abilities. In the direct learning model, the students with the high mathematical reasoning abilities have  better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low mathematical reasoning abilities. 4) In each of the mathematical reasoning abilities of students which are high and moderate, the cooperative learning model of the jigsaw type results same learning achievement in Mathematics as the cooperative learning model of the TGT type and the direct learning model. In addition, in the low mathematical reasoning abilities, the cooperative learning model of the jigsaw type results better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model.Keywords: Jigsaw, TGT, Direct Learning, and Mathematical Reasoning Abilities
STRATEGI GURU DALAM MEMBELAJARKAN MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI LINGKARAN KEPADA ANAK TUNAGRAHITA (Studi Kasus pada Siswa Kelas VIII SLB Muhammadiyah Cepu) Anita Dewi Utami; Imam Sujadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study was to describe teacher’s strategy in teaching mathematics on the topic of circle to intellectual disability students in SLB Muhammadiyah Cepu. The subject of this  study was classroom mathematics teacher and all students of eighth grade of SLB Muhammadiyah Cepu. The data of this study was teacher’s strategy in teaching mathematics on the topic of circle taken from the result of recording transcription of teaching and learning process through two observations. The data validity technique used in this study was member check, a process of data checking taken by the researcher from the subject of the study to examine the possibilities of different assumptions. The result reveal that in opening activity (pre-activity) and closing activity (post-activity), teacher implemented movement and rhythm strategy by asking the students to sing circle song. While in the main activity, teacher’s strategy in teaching mathematics on the topic of circle was dealing with conceptual knowledge by implementing  Bruner’s learning theory at enactive stage, it is by introducing the concept of the form of circle with some learning media to students. Then, the teacher’s strategy in teaching mathematics on the topic of circle which deals with procedural knowledge was by implementating guided discovery model, it is by guiding the students to do activity to count the circle’s  circumference by using thread. But, because of the limitation of the mentally handicapped students’ intellectuality, the guided discovery model which was implemented by the teacher was firstly by giving some examples to the students, then asking the students to practice to find the circle’s circumference from the length of the thread by the students themselves.Keywords: teacher’s strategy, conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, mathematics teaching learning, student with intellectual disability.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LC 5E DISERTAI AFL PADA MATERI PRISMA DAN LIMAS DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT Guritno Ari Wibowo; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research investigated the effect of using Learning Cycle 5E model using AfL in Mathematics course achievement viewed from Adversity Quotient. The quasi experimental research design was employed on this research. The technique analysis data used two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cell frequencies at 0,05 level of significance. The results show as follows 1) LC 5E with AfL model gave better Mathematics course achievement than the one without AfL and conventional model, and LC 5E without AfL gave better Mathematics course achievement than conventional model. 2) The students who are climber have better Mathematics course achievement than camper and quitter, and  the students who are camper have similar Mathematics achievement compared to quitter. 3) In LC 5E with AfL model, the climber category students Mathematics achievements are better than the ones who are camper and quitter, and the camper category students Mathematics achievements were better than the ones who are quitter. In LC 5E model, the climber category students Mathematics achievements are better than the ones who are camper and quitter, and the Mathematics achievements of camper category students were similar with the ones who are quitter. In the conventional model, whether climber, camper, or quitter have the same Mathematics course achievement. 4) Mathematics course achievement of climber category students was the same whether when they were given LC 5E with AfL or LC 5E, on the other hand those are better than the conventional model. The students who are camper category had better Mathematics achievement when they were given LC 5E include AfL and LC 5E than when were given conventional model, however those students had the same Mathematics achievement whether when they were given LC 5E or conventional model. The quitter category students had the same Mathematics achievement when they were given LC 5E with AfL, LC 5E, or conventional model.Keywords: Learning model, LC 5E, Assessment for Learning, Adversity Quotient.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Hidayat Abdul Razak Abdul Razak Abi Fadila Achmad Ridwan, Achmad Adeyanto, Rizki Adi Wahyu Kuncara Agus Suprijono Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Syawaludin Ahmad, Ahmad Aisyah Senja Mustika Aji Permana Putra Alfonsa Maria Sofia Hapsari Ali Fakhrudin Ali Fakhrudin, Ali Amiratih Siti Aisyah Andriawan Nurcahyo, Andriawan Anesa Surya Anggraheni Marsella Bella Astuti Anggreini, Dewi Anis Hanafiah Anita Dewi Utami Anna Setyowati Anna Setyowati Annisa Ayu Kuserawati Annisa Fatiah Ardiantoro, Gigih Ardiyani, Shila Majid Arifa Apriliana Arifa Apriliana, Arifa Arinta Rara Kirana Ariska Yuliana Putri Ariska Yuliana Putri Arsa’ad Kurniadi Arsa’ad Kurniadi Arum Dwi Rahmawati Dwi Rahmawati, Arum Dwi Rahmawati Dwi Arumingtyas, Pramesti Asih Duwi Mawartini Aslam Aslam, Aslam Asrowi Asrowi Asy’ari Asy’ari Asy’ari, Asy’ari Asyraf, Asyraf Atik Wahyuni Aulia Musla Mustika Aulia Musla Mustika author Ari Suningsih Awaluddin Tjalla Aziza, Luthfita Bayu Kurniawan, Sandra Berti Dyah Permatasari Broto Apriliyanto Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Burhan Mustaqim Chumdari Chumdari, Chumdari CORRY LIANA Darmono, Prasetiyo Budi Desy Nur Wulandari Desy Nur Wulandary Dewi Ariyanti Dewi Kurniasari, Dewi Dewi Rahmawati Noer Jannah Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Diana Tri Purnamasari Diari Indriati Dita Qondiyana Djumaliningsih, Nosa Putri Dwi Isna Wardani Dwi Yuni Pramugarini Dwiani Listya Kartika Dwiani Listya Kartika, Dwiani Listya Dyah Susilawati E.P.U, Moertiningsih Edi Irawan Edi Irawan Edi Irawan Edi Irawan Edi Irawan Eka Agustina Khairunnisa Eka Nur Azizah Eka Nur Azizah Endah Asmarawati, Endah Endah Wulantina, Endah Endang Sri Handayani ERLAN SISWANDI Erni Susanti Ersam Mahendrawan Evi Novitasari Fadhilah, Miming Farah Heniati Santosa Farah Heniati Santosa, Farah Heniati Fatir, Fatir Fika Widya Pratama Firna Irnistisia Fitri Andika Nurussafa’at, Fitri Andika Fitri Andika Nurussafa’at Fitriani, Nur Syarifah Fransiska Januarti Gusman Gatut Iswahyudi Gesti Ayu Diah Asera Gigih Ardiantoro Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi, Gunarhadi Guritno Ari Wibowo Guritno Ari Wibowo Hadi Mulyono Hadiyah Hadiyah Hadiyah Hadiyah Halimah Halimah Hanafiah, Anis Hapsari, Alfonsa Maria Sofia Hartono Hartono Hartono Hartono Hartono, Edy Hasan Mahfud Hasanah, A.K Uswatun Hendrayanto, Dhani Nur Hesa Resti Arumanda Hesti Yuni Ayu Lestari Hidayat Bahktiar Hidayat Bahktiar, Hidayat Hidayat, Edisut Taufik Hidayat, Edisut Taufik Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh I.R. Widianto Atmojo Ibnu Sadono Idam Ragil Widianto Atmojo Idam Ragil Widianto Atmojo Ikhsan Abdul Latif Ikrar Pramudya Ikrar Pramudya Ikrar Pramudya, Ikrar Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Imam Wijaya, Henry Putra Indah Slamet Budiarti Indar Diasmi Aulianisa Indriana Dewi Irawan, Edi Irma Ayuwanti Irma Ayuwanti Irnistisia, Firna Isnaeni Umi Machromah Iswahyudi, Gatut Iswanti, Partia Iva Sarifah Ivana Ivana Ivana Izzatul Fajriyah, Izzatul Joko Daryanto Joko Daryanto Joko Susilo Juitaning Mustika Juliana Nasution Justiarani, Justiarani Karsono Karsono Kartika Chrysti Suryandari Kartono , Kuncara, Adi Wahyu Kurniasari Elsya Rosyana Kurniasari, Dewi Kurniawan, Sandra Bayu Kurniawati, Rina Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kusuma, Elisabet Dyah Lenny Puspita Dewi Lestari, Hesti Yuni Ayu Lies Lestari Lies Lestari Lina Utami Lis Maryani Listyaputri, Dinar Rizky Luthfiana Mirati, Luthfiana Luthfiyah Nanda Bertha Armelia M Ismail Sriyanto M Ismail Sriyanto M Ismail Sriyono M. Ismail Sriyanto M. Ismail Sriyanto Madani , Faisal Maghfiroh Yanuarti Maghfiroh Yanuarti Mania Roswitha Mania Roswitha Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Masriani . Matsuri Matsuri Matsuri, Matsuri Maya Novita Sari Merrydian, Siska Miftachudin Miftachudin Miftachudin, Miftachudin Miftah Hur Rahman Zh Moertiningsih E.P.U Mufarrihah, Iftitaahul Muhamad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Gazali Muhammad Gazali Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Syarif Hidayatussalam Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyaningrum Lestari, Mulyaningrum Musrika, Musrika Mustika, Aisyah Senja Najmul Laila Nia Apriyanti Niendya Ashiefa Parahita Nina Nurmasari Nina Nurmasari Nindya Ashiefa Parahita Ningroom, Rita Arfi Astuti Nok Yeni Heryaningsih Nok Yeni Heryaningsih, Nok Yeni Noor Hidayati Noor Hidayati Nosa Putri Djumaliningsih Novita Dwi Ashohib Noviyanti, Ika Nurma Nur Ainsah H. Saleh Nur Insani Nur Syarifah Fitriani Nuraini Muhassanah Nurudin, M. Nurul Amalia K W Nurul Amalia K W Nyoto Nyoto Nyoto Nyoto, Nyoto Oka Tamaraningtyas Patrisius Afrisno Udil, Patrisius Afrisno Peduk Rintayati Prabowo, Haniftia Haqqiendini Pratama, Riska Widya Pratiwi, Rani Prestanti Hayuningtyas Priyogo, Adi Puji Ayuni Puji Ayuni Rany Widyastuti Rejeki, Suprapti Rima Aksen Cahdriyana Rima Aksen Cahdriyana Rina Kurniawati Rini, Indah Mustika Rintayati, Peduk Risbiyantoro, Hendro Riska Widya Pratama Riswandha, Septian Henry Rizki Adeyanto Rizky L, Dinar Rizqi Aditya Nugraha Rokimin, Rokimin Rosyida, Entyka Mayhasti S Retnowati S Siswanto S Subanti Sajidan Sajidan Salmianti, Salmianti Samsi Suryanjani Sandi Sandi Sandra Bayu Kurniawan Saputri, Alinggi Nindi Saputri, Dwi Yuniasih Saputri, Rose Andriyani Selvi Marcellia Septi Triyani Septi Triyani SEPTINA ALRIANINGRUM Sherly Mayfana Panglipur Yekti Shila Majid Ardiyani Shila Majid Ardiyani Sigit Pamungkas Sigit Pamungkas Sigit Rimbatmojo Siswanto Siswanto Siswanto Siswanto Siti Kamsiyati Siti Kamsiyati Siti Kamsiyati Siti Kamsiyati Siti Komsatun Slamet Riyadi Sonny Ari Wibowo Sri Hartati Ningsih Sri Hartati Ningsih Sri Mardani Sri Marmoah Sri Mastuti Sri Subanti Sri Yamtinah Sriyati, Sriyati Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Sugeng Priyanto, Sugeng Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Sujadi, Imam Sujadi, Imam Sukarmin Sulaiman Sulaiman Sumanah Sumanah Sumanah Sumanah Suprapti Rejeki Susilawati, Dyah Syam, Aldo Redho Syamsul Arifin Syarifah, Triana Jamilatus T A Kusmayadi T Dwi Hastuti Tambunan, Rifka Paulina Tanti Listiani Tanti Listiani, Tanti Tarmo Tarmo Tarmo, Tarmo Titik Yuniarti Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Silaningsih Tri Silaningsih Triana Jamilatus Syarifah Triyanto . Triyanto . Triyanto . Triyanto Triyanto Triyanto, Triyanto Tunggu Biyarti Twiningsih, Anik Tyas, Wahyu Handining Ulfa Masamah Ulfa Masamah, Ulfa Ummi Rosyidah Ummi Rosyidah, Ummi V Kartikaningtyas Veronika Yusnita Andriani Prastika Via Yustitia Vita Purnamasari Vivi Fenty Anggraeny Vivi Fenty Anggraeny Wahyu Prihatiningrum Wahyu Prihatiningrum Wahyumiarti Wahyumiarti, Wahyumiarti Wardani Rahayu Wibowo, Sonny Ari Widodo Widodo Yekti Putri Kusumaningtyas Yekti Putri Kusumaningtyas Yogi Bagus Dwi Cahyono Yuliana Yuliana Yulianti Yulianti Yulianti Yulianti Yuniarti, Titik Zara Mertiana RZ Zara Mertiana RZ Zulfa, Faradina Nilam