Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
10.125
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar KUMARA CENDEKIA Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia) : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching) International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series Proceedings Education and Language International Conference Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education JURNAL TARBIYAH JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Basicedu Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Jurnal Fundadikdas (Fundamental Pendidikan Dasar) Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs): Conference Series Jurnal Didaktika Dwija Indria Generation Journal Abdi Masyarakat JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika) Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal (Birle Journal) Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika TEACHING : Jurnal Inovasi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Kalam Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan Al-Khidmah Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Pengabdian Inovasi dan Teknologi Kepada Masyarakat Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review Al-Aulia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Jurnal Basicedu Pancaran Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Jurnal Tatsqif EDUCENTER JURNAL PENDIDIKAN Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan ABISATYA: Journal of Community Engagement
Riyadi Riyadi
Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 300 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 300 Documents
Search

 20   21   22   23   24 
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF JIGSAW DAN TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTRAPERSONAL SISWA Noor Hidayati; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract. The aims of the research were to determine: (1) which one has better learning achievement, Jigsaw learning model, TGT, or conventional, (2) which one has better learning achievement, students with high, middle or low intrapersonal, (3) based on learning model, which one has better learning achievement, students with high, middle, or low intrapersonal intelligence, (4) based on intrapersonal intelligence, which one has better learning achievement, Jigsaw learning model, TGT, or conventional. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research with  a 3 x 3 factorial design. The population was XI science  students  of Senior High School in Kudus regency on academic year 2013/2014. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the sample were 277 students consisted of 95 students in the first experimental group, 87 students in the second and 95 for the control class. The instruments used were mathematics  achievement test and  intrapersonal intelligence questionnaire. The hypotheses testing used unbalanced two ways ANOVA. Based on hypothesis testing, it can be concluded as follow. (1) Student learning achievement  treated by TGT  is better than Jigsaw  and conventional, and Jigsaw model is better than conventional, (2) Learning achievement of students who have high intrapersonal intelligence is better than students who have middle and low intrapersonal intelligence, and students who have middle intrapersonal intelligence is better than students who have low intrapersonal intelligence, (3) Based on  all types of learning models,    students who have high intrapersonal intelligence have better learning achievement than students who have middle and low intrapersonal intelligence, and students who have  middle intrapersonal intelligence have better learning achievement than student  who have low intrapersonal intelligence. (4)  For high intrapersonal intelligence, students learning achievement treated by TGT is better than Jigsaw, for both learning models,  Jigsaw  and conventional have the same learning achievement. For middle intrapersonal intelligence, students learning achievement treated by TGT  is better than conventional, while both learning models,  Jigsaw and conventional have the same learning achievement. For low intrapersonal intelligence,  conventional and TGT are better than Jigsaw, while both learning models, TGT and conventional have the same learning achievement.Keywords: Jigsaw, TGT,  intrapersonal intelligence, learning achievement.  
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS), TIPE MAKE A MATCH (MAM) DAN TIPE GUIDE NOTE TAKING (GNT) DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA SMA MUHAMMADIYAH KOTA SURAKARTA Nurul Amalia K W; Riyadi Riyadi; Imam Sujadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to know: (1) which of  learning model gives a better learning mathematics achievement, learning model of TPS, learning model of MAM or learning model of GNT on logarithm, (2) which has better learning mathematics achievement, students with cognitive style FD or FI cognitive style, (3) in each learning model (TPS, MAM, GNT), which cognitive style that give a better learning mathematics achievement, the cognitive style of FD or cognitive styles of FI. (4) in each cognitive style (field dependent (FD) and field independent (FI)), which of the learning model give a better learning mathematics result, learning model of TPS, MAM or GNT. This research was a quasi-experimental research with a 3 x 2 factorial design. The population in this research was senior high school students of grade X in Surakarta. The sample was taken by using the cluster random sampling technique. The study samples of this research were the students of SMA Muhammadiyah 1, SMA Muhammadiyah 2, and SMA Muhammadiyah 3. The instruments that was used to collect the data were cognitive test styles and the learning mathematics achievement test of logarithms. Testing of hypothesis used  two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells using significance level  a = 0.05. Based on hypothesis testing, it can be concluded that: (1) the learning achievement in mathematics on topic of discussion of logarithm resulting from the learning model of the TPS model  is as good as that of the MAM model  and that of the GNT model, (2) the students with the FI cognitive styles have a better learning achievement in mathematics on the topic of logarithm than those with the FD cognitive style, (3) in each of the learning models (TPS, MAM, GNT) the FI cognitive style results in  a better learning achievement in mathematics on the topic of logarithm than the FD cognitive style, (4) in FD cognitif style, the learning models of TPS, learning models of MAM, learning models of GNT give the same learning achievement, whereas in FI cognitive style, the learning models of GNT gives a better learning mathematics achievement than learning models of MAM and learning models of TPS.Keywords: TPS, MAM, GNT, Cognitive Styles, Learning Mathematics achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DITINJAU DARI KATEGORI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL PESERTA DIDIK TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR MATEMATIS TINGKAT TINGGI KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SRAGEN Siti Mutmainah; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning models on the high order mathematical thinking skill viewed from the emotional quotient of the students. The learning models compared were PBL model, GI learning model, and direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research. Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary Schools in Sragen. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 269 students. They were grouped into three classes, namely: 90 students in Experimental Class 1, 90 students in Experimental Class 2, and 89 students in Control Class. The instruments to collect the data were test of high order mathematical thinking skill, and emotional quotient questionnaire. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. (1) PBL model results better high order mathematical thinking skill than GI learning model, and direct learning model, GI learning model results better high order mathematical thinking skill than direct learning model. (2) Emotional quotient gives students different effect on high order mathematical thinking skill of students. The students with the high emotional quotient have better high order mathematical thinking skill than those with the moderate emotional quotient and those with the low emotional quotient, the students with the moderate emotional quotient have better high order mathematical thinking skill than those with the low emotional quotient. (3) There was not an interaction of the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the emotional quotient on the high order mathematical thinking skill of the students.Keywords: PBL model, GI learning model, direct learning model, high order mathematical thinking skill and emotional quotient
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NHT DAN TIPE JIGSAW PADA POKOK BAHASAN TRIGONOMETRI KELAS XI-IPA SMA SE-KABUPATEN KUDUS DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Arsa’ad Kurniadi; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to determine: (1) which produces better mathematics learning achievement, NHT, Jigsaw, or conventional learning model, (2) which has better mathematics learning achievement, the students with high, medium or low learning motivation, (3) on each learning model, which provide mathematics learning achievement better, the student with high, medium or low learning motivation, (4) on each level of student mathematics learning motivation, which provide learning achievement better, NHT, Jigsaw, or conventional learning model. This research was quasi experimental research with factorial design 3 x 3. The research population was all XI science grade students of senior high school in Kudus regency in academic year 2013/2014. The sampling technique of this research was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The techniques of data collection by using test, questionnaire, and documentation. Hypothesis testing used two way analysis of variance with the unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows: (1) Jigsaw learning model produces better learning achievement than NHT and conventional learning model. NHT learning model show learning achievement as good as conventional learning model. (2) The students who have high learning motivation have a better academic achievement than the students who have medium and low learning motivation. The students with medium learning motivation have learning achievement as good as the students with low learning motivation. (3) In Jigsaw learning model, students who have high learning motivation has academic achievement as good as students who have medium learning motivation, students who have high learning motivation have a better academic achievement than students who have a low learning motivation and students who have medium learning motivation are having academic achievement as good as students who have a low learning motivation. In the NHT learning model and conventional, the students who have high, medium and low learning motivation have equally good learning achievement, (4) In high learning motivation, Jigsaw learning model produces academic achievement better than NHT and conventional learning model. NHT learning model produce academic achievement as good as conventional learning model. In medium and low learning motivation, Jigsaw, NHT and conventional learning model produce equally good learning achievement.Key words:   Jigsaw learning model, NHT learning model, Conventional learning model, Learning Motivation, Mathematics Learning Achievment.
PROSES METAKOGNISI DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA PADA SISWA KELAS XI DI SMA NEGERI BANYUMAS Dwiani Listya Kartika; Riyadi Riyadi; Imam Sujadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract : The purposes of this research were to describe: (1) metacognition process in mathematical problem solving linear programming subject matter of grade XI students with high academic ability in Banyumas State Senior High School, (2) metacognition process in mathematical problem solving linear programming subject of grade XI students with medium academic ability in Banyumas State Senior High School, and (3) metacognition process in mathematical problem solving linear programming subject matter of grade XI students with low academic ability in Banyumas State Senior High School. This research was a qualitative descriptive research and the subjects were grade XI students of Banyumas State Senior High School in academic year 2014/2015.  The subjects were selected based on specific criteria by using  snowball sampling technique. Data was collected by using interview based on problem solving tasks  and validity of the data was done by using time triangulation. Data validity was used to determine the metacognition process in mathematical problem solving from each research subject in each component metacognition process. The components were arranging the  strategy or action plan, controlling or monitoring the actions, and evaluating  the action. Results showed that students with high, medium, and low academic ability realized their thinking process by identifying the information of the problem when arranged the action plan. However, there are students with low academic ability can not recall their prior knowledge previously required. They also can not make the  plan solutions are used. The plans solution are knowing the concepts that will be used and estimating the time required to complete it. Furthermore, when monitored the actions, all of subjects from high, medium, and low academic ability had tried to realize their thinking process when explained the problem solving procedures by verifying and clarifying the results of their written work and identifying the  strategies while expressing the reason of the strategies are used. The students with high and  medium academic ability developed their plan action solutions prepared in accordance with the plan. However, there are students with low academic ability  who have not been able to develop all plans prepared solution according to their plans. Furthermore, only students with high academic ability who are able to evaluate or assess the results of their written work properly despite there are some  students with low academic ability  who can do it too.Keywords: Metacognition Process, Mathematical Problem Solving, Academic Ability
ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL CERITA PADA MATERI VOLUME PRISMA DENGAN FONG’S SHCEMATIC MODEL FOR ERROR ANALYSIS DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA Fitri Andika Nurussafa’at; Imam Sujadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to find out students’ error in solving stories problems on prism volume using fong’s shcematic model for error analysis viewed from the students’ cognitive style. This study was conducted in SMP IT Ibnu abbas Klaten in the academic year of 2013/2014. This study is a qualitative study. The technique used in selecting the research subjects was purposive sample. The subjects used in this study were 6 students taken from grade VIII. The result is: (1) the errors experienced by students with field dependent type is more dominant than operational errors, and mathematical themes errors, (2) the errors experienced by students with field independent type is more dominant than language errors, (3) the factors that caused students with field dependent type to make mistakes in solving prism volume word problems based were: the inadvertence on reading the problems, the forgetfulness, in a hurry to finish, the effect of the previous mistakes, and the lack of understanding on the sequence of solving the problems, (4) the factors that caused students with field independent type to make mistakes in solving prism volume problems based were: the assumption that the symbol (=) might be replaced with the symbol (:), the desire to quickly finish the problems, in a hurry in solving the problems, the habit of incomplete problems writing, the effect of the previous mistakes, the lack of the steps mastery of solving the given problems.Keywords: Error analysis, Prism Volume, Fong’s Shcematic Model For Error Analysis, Cognitive style.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION GUIDE NOTE TAKING (TAI GNT) DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA Muhammad Gazali; Riyadi Riyadi; Mania Roswitha
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics learning achievement viewed from students independence learning. The learning models compared were cooperative learning model of TAI GNT, cooperative learning model of TAI, and conventional model. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population was the tenth grade students of senior high school at East Lombok in the first semester of the academic year 2012/2013. The size of the sample was 104 students is given the cooperative learning model of TAI GNT type, 106 students is given the cooperative learning model of TAI type, 105 students is given model of conventional type. The instruments used were documentation, questionnaire, and test methods. The data was analyzed using two way analysis of variance. The results of this research are as follows. (1) The TAI GNT model gives better mathematics learning achievement than TAI and conventional model, besides, TAI model gives better mathematics learning achievement than conventional model. (2) The students with high independence learning have better mathematic learning achievement than students with medium and low independence learning, and the students with medium independence learning have the same mathematics learning achievement as the students with low independence learning. (3) In each level of independence learning (high, medium, and low), TAI GNT model gives better mathematics learning achievement than TAI and conventional model, besides, TAI model gives better mathematic learning achievement than conventional model. (4) In each learning models (TAI GNT, TAI and conventional), the students with high independence learning have better mathematics learning achievement than the students with medium and low independence learning, and the students with medium independence learning have the same mathematics learning achievement as the students with low independence learning.Keywords: cooperative learning, team assisted individualization, guide note taking, independence learning.
PROSES BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA SMP DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN SISWA Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh; Budi Usodo; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research is aimed at describing the creative thinking process of students with rational personality type, idealist personality type, guardian personality type, and  artisan personality type in solving mathematics problems. It was a descriptive qualitative research. The subject of this research was taken by using a purposive sampling. The subject of this research were 4 of the eighth grade students at SMP Negeri 2 Jenar, Sragen Regency, consisting of 1 student with rational personality type, 1 student with idealist personality type, 1 student with guardian personality type, and 1 student with artisan personality type. The techniques of collecting the data in this research were questionnaire, written test, and interview on plane geometri subject. The techniques of validating the data were time triangulation and sufficient references. The technique of analyzing the data was Miles and Huberman concept, namely, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings of the research show that (1) the student with rational personality type has creative thinking process level 1 (less creative); (2) the student with idealist personality type has creative thinking process level 3 (creative); (3) the student with guardian personality type has creative thinking process level 3 (creative); (4) the student with artisan personality type has creative thinking process level 0 (not creative). Keywords: Creative Thinking Process, Mathematics Problem Solving, Personality Type
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN THINKING ALOUD PAIRS PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SIKAP PERCAYA DIRI SISWA SMPN KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Maghfiroh Yanuarti; Budi Usodo; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the self confidence of the students. The learning models compared were Think Pair Share (TPS)  model, Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem (TAPPS) model, and conventional model. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Sukoharjo. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 302 students; consisted of 100 students in the first experimental class, 101 in the second experimental class, and 101 students in control class. The instruments used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and questionnaire of self confidence. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it showed that the data had same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It showed that three classes had balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed that: (1) TPS model had better learning achievement than TAPPS model and conventional model, TAPPS model had better learning achievement than conventional model. (2) the students having high self confidence had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self confidence, the students having medium and low self confidence had equally mathematics learning achievement. (3) there was an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the self confidence on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the student.Keywords:Think Pair Share (TPS), Think Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (TAPPS), mathematics learning achievement, and self confidence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DENGAN GUIDED NOTE TAKING (GNT) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI Se-KABUPATEN KLATEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Dyah Susilawati; Budi Usodo; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

 Abstrac: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from learning activities of the students. The learning models compared were the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) with Guided Note Taking (GNT) learning model, the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning model, and conventional learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of state Junior Secondery  School of the Klaten regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. Instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement test and the learning activities questionnaire. The data were analyzed using unbalanced two ways ANOVA. The results of the research are as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT result in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the  cooperative learning model of TAI and the conventional learning model, whereas cooperative learning model of TAI result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the learning model conventional. 2) The students with the high learning activities have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as  the moderate learning activities. The students with the high and moderate learning activitiy have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with low learning activities. 3) In the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT and TAI, the students with the high learning activities have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate activities and the students with high and moderate learning activities have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low learning activities. In the conventional learning model, the students with high learning activities have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate learning activities, whereas the high and moderate learning activities have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low learning activities. 4) For the students with the high and moderate learning activities, the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the cooperative learning model of TAI and the conventional learning model. The student with the low learning activities, the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the cooperative learning model of TAI, whereas the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT and TAI result a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those the conventional learning model.Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Guided Note Taking (GNT), conventional learning, Learning Activities, Learning Mathematics Achievement
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Hidayat Abdul Razak Abdul Razak Abi Fadila Achmad Ridwan, Achmad Adeyanto, Rizki Adi Wahyu Kuncara Agus Suprijono Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Syawaludin Ahmad, Ahmad Aisyah Senja Mustika Aji Permana Putra Alfonsa Maria Sofia Hapsari Ali Fakhrudin Ali Fakhrudin, Ali Amiratih Siti Aisyah Andriawan Nurcahyo, Andriawan Anesa Surya Anggraheni Marsella Bella Astuti Anggreini, Dewi Anis Hanafiah Anita Dewi Utami Anna Setyowati Anna Setyowati Annisa Ayu Kuserawati Annisa Fatiah Ardiantoro, Gigih Ardiyani, Shila Majid Arifa Apriliana Arifa Apriliana, Arifa Arinta Rara Kirana Ariska Yuliana Putri Ariska Yuliana Putri Arsa’ad Kurniadi Arsa’ad Kurniadi Arum Dwi Rahmawati Dwi Rahmawati, Arum Dwi Rahmawati Dwi Arumingtyas, Pramesti Asih Duwi Mawartini Aslam Aslam, Aslam Asrowi Asrowi Asy’ari Asy’ari Asy’ari, Asy’ari Asyraf, Asyraf Atik Wahyuni Aulia Musla Mustika Aulia Musla Mustika author Ari Suningsih Awaluddin Tjalla Aziza, Luthfita Bayu Kurniawan, Sandra Berti Dyah Permatasari Broto Apriliyanto Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Burhan Mustaqim Chumdari Chumdari, Chumdari CORRY LIANA Darmono, Prasetiyo Budi Desy Nur Wulandari Desy Nur Wulandary Dewi Ariyanti Dewi Kurniasari, Dewi Dewi Rahmawati Noer Jannah Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Diana Tri Purnamasari Diari Indriati Dita Qondiyana Djumaliningsih, Nosa Putri Dwi Isna Wardani Dwi Yuni Pramugarini Dwiani Listya Kartika Dwiani Listya Kartika, Dwiani Listya Dyah Susilawati E.P.U, Moertiningsih Edi Irawan Edi Irawan Edi Irawan Edi Irawan Edi Irawan Eka Agustina Khairunnisa Eka Nur Azizah Eka Nur Azizah Endah Asmarawati, Endah Endah Wulantina, Endah Endang Sri Handayani ERLAN SISWANDI Erni Susanti Ersam Mahendrawan Evi Novitasari Fadhilah, Miming Farah Heniati Santosa Farah Heniati Santosa, Farah Heniati Fatir, Fatir Fika Widya Pratama Firna Irnistisia Fitri Andika Nurussafa’at, Fitri Andika Fitri Andika Nurussafa’at Fitriani, Nur Syarifah Fransiska Januarti Gusman Gatut Iswahyudi Gesti Ayu Diah Asera Gigih Ardiantoro Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi, Gunarhadi Guritno Ari Wibowo Guritno Ari Wibowo Hadi Mulyono Hadiyah Hadiyah Hadiyah Hadiyah Halimah Halimah Hanafiah, Anis Hapsari, Alfonsa Maria Sofia Hartono Hartono Hartono Hartono Hartono, Edy Hasan Mahfud Hasanah, A.K Uswatun Hendrayanto, Dhani Nur Hesa Resti Arumanda Hesti Yuni Ayu Lestari Hidayat Bahktiar Hidayat Bahktiar, Hidayat Hidayat, Edisut Taufik Hidayat, Edisut Taufik Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh I.R. Widianto Atmojo Ibnu Sadono Idam Ragil Widianto Atmojo Idam Ragil Widianto Atmojo Ikhsan Abdul Latif Ikrar Pramudya Ikrar Pramudya Ikrar Pramudya, Ikrar Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Imam Wijaya, Henry Putra Indah Slamet Budiarti Indar Diasmi Aulianisa Indriana Dewi Irawan, Edi Irma Ayuwanti Irma Ayuwanti Irnistisia, Firna Isnaeni Umi Machromah Iswahyudi, Gatut Iswanti, Partia Iva Sarifah Ivana Ivana Ivana Izzatul Fajriyah, Izzatul Joko Daryanto Joko Daryanto Joko Susilo Juitaning Mustika Juliana Nasution Justiarani, Justiarani Karsono Karsono Kartika Chrysti Suryandari Kartono , Kuncara, Adi Wahyu Kurniasari Elsya Rosyana Kurniasari, Dewi Kurniawan, Sandra Bayu Kurniawati, Rina Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kusuma, Elisabet Dyah Lenny Puspita Dewi Lestari, Hesti Yuni Ayu Lies Lestari Lies Lestari Lina Utami Lis Maryani Listyaputri, Dinar Rizky Luthfiana Mirati, Luthfiana Luthfiyah Nanda Bertha Armelia M Ismail Sriyanto M Ismail Sriyanto M Ismail Sriyono M. Ismail Sriyanto M. Ismail Sriyanto Madani , Faisal Maghfiroh Yanuarti Maghfiroh Yanuarti Mania Roswitha Mania Roswitha Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Masriani . Matsuri Matsuri Matsuri, Matsuri Maya Novita Sari Merrydian, Siska Miftachudin Miftachudin Miftachudin, Miftachudin Miftah Hur Rahman Zh Moertiningsih E.P.U Mufarrihah, Iftitaahul Muhamad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Gazali Muhammad Gazali Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Syarif Hidayatussalam Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyaningrum Lestari, Mulyaningrum Musrika, Musrika Mustika, Aisyah Senja Najmul Laila Nia Apriyanti Niendya Ashiefa Parahita Nina Nurmasari Nina Nurmasari Nindya Ashiefa Parahita Ningroom, Rita Arfi Astuti Nok Yeni Heryaningsih Nok Yeni Heryaningsih, Nok Yeni Noor Hidayati Noor Hidayati Nosa Putri Djumaliningsih Novita Dwi Ashohib Noviyanti, Ika Nurma Nur Ainsah H. Saleh Nur Insani Nur Syarifah Fitriani Nuraini Muhassanah Nurudin, M. Nurul Amalia K W Nurul Amalia K W Nyoto Nyoto Nyoto Nyoto, Nyoto Oka Tamaraningtyas Patrisius Afrisno Udil, Patrisius Afrisno Peduk Rintayati Prabowo, Haniftia Haqqiendini Pratama, Riska Widya Pratiwi, Rani Prestanti Hayuningtyas Priyogo, Adi Puji Ayuni Puji Ayuni Rany Widyastuti Rejeki, Suprapti Rima Aksen Cahdriyana Rima Aksen Cahdriyana Rina Kurniawati Rini, Indah Mustika Rintayati, Peduk Risbiyantoro, Hendro Riska Widya Pratama Riswandha, Septian Henry Rizki Adeyanto Rizky L, Dinar Rizqi Aditya Nugraha Rokimin, Rokimin Rosyida, Entyka Mayhasti S Retnowati S Siswanto S Subanti Sajidan Sajidan Salmianti, Salmianti Samsi Suryanjani Sandi Sandi Sandra Bayu Kurniawan Saputri, Alinggi Nindi Saputri, Dwi Yuniasih Saputri, Rose Andriyani Selvi Marcellia Septi Triyani Septi Triyani SEPTINA ALRIANINGRUM Sherly Mayfana Panglipur Yekti Shila Majid Ardiyani Shila Majid Ardiyani Sigit Pamungkas Sigit Pamungkas Sigit Rimbatmojo Siswanto Siswanto Siswanto Siswanto Siti Kamsiyati Siti Kamsiyati Siti Kamsiyati Siti Kamsiyati Siti Komsatun Slamet Riyadi Sonny Ari Wibowo Sri Hartati Ningsih Sri Hartati Ningsih Sri Mardani Sri Marmoah Sri Mastuti Sri Subanti Sri Yamtinah Sriyati, Sriyati Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Sugeng Priyanto, Sugeng Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Sujadi, Imam Sujadi, Imam Sukarmin Sulaiman Sulaiman Sumanah Sumanah Sumanah Sumanah Suprapti Rejeki Susilawati, Dyah Syam, Aldo Redho Syamsul Arifin Syarifah, Triana Jamilatus T A Kusmayadi T Dwi Hastuti Tambunan, Rifka Paulina Tanti Listiani Tanti Listiani, Tanti Tarmo Tarmo Tarmo, Tarmo Titik Yuniarti Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Silaningsih Tri Silaningsih Triana Jamilatus Syarifah Triyanto . Triyanto . Triyanto . Triyanto Triyanto Triyanto, Triyanto Tunggu Biyarti Twiningsih, Anik Tyas, Wahyu Handining Ulfa Masamah Ulfa Masamah, Ulfa Ummi Rosyidah Ummi Rosyidah, Ummi V Kartikaningtyas Veronika Yusnita Andriani Prastika Via Yustitia Vita Purnamasari Vivi Fenty Anggraeny Vivi Fenty Anggraeny Wahyu Prihatiningrum Wahyu Prihatiningrum Wahyumiarti Wahyumiarti, Wahyumiarti Wardani Rahayu Wibowo, Sonny Ari Widodo Widodo Yekti Putri Kusumaningtyas Yekti Putri Kusumaningtyas Yogi Bagus Dwi Cahyono Yuliana Yuliana Yulianti Yulianti Yulianti Yulianti Yuniarti, Titik Zara Mertiana RZ Zara Mertiana RZ Zulfa, Faradina Nilam