Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
10.85
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar KUMARA CENDEKIA Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) ASAS : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia) : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan Jurnal Gantang KAREBA : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching) International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series Proceedings Education and Language International Conference AL ISHLAH Jurnal Pendidikan QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education JURNAL TARBIYAH JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Basicedu International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala Jurnal Fundadikdas (Fundamental Pendidikan Dasar) Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs): Conference Series Jurnal Didaktika Dwija Indria Jurnal Pengembangan Penyuluhan Pertanian JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika) TECHNO-SOCIO EKONOMIKA Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal (Birle Journal) Jurnal Evaluasi dan Pembelajaran International Journal of Business, Law, and Education International Journal of Social Learning (IJSL) Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Pembelajaran TEACHING : Jurnal Inovasi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Kalam Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review Jurnal Basicedu Pancaran Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya Jurnal Tatsqif Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi UHO : Jurnal Penelitian Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi dan Informasi JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Instructional Media International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science Daarus Tsaqofah Jurnal Pendidikan Pascasarjana Universitas Qomaruddin Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif Jurnal Wacana Kinerja: Kajian Praktis-Akademis Kinerja dan Administrasi Pelayanan Publik
Riyadi Riyadi
Universitas Sebelas Maret
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 250 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 250 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN THINKING ALOUD PAIRS PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SIKAP PERCAYA DIRI SISWA SMPN KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Yanuarti, Maghfiroh; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (501.988 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the self confidence of the students. The learning models compared were Think Pair Share (TPS)  model, Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem (TAPPS) model, and conventional model. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Sukoharjo. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 302 students; consisted of 100 students in the first experimental class, 101 in the second experimental class, and 101 students in control class. The instruments used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and questionnaire of self confidence. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it showed that the data had same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It showed that three classes had balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed that: (1) TPS model had better learning achievement than TAPPS model and conventional model, TAPPS model had better learning achievement than conventional model. (2) the students having high self confidence had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self confidence, the students having medium and low self confidence had equally mathematics learning achievement. (3) there was an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the self confidence on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the student.Keywords:Think Pair Share (TPS), Think Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (TAPPS), mathematics learning achievement, and self confidence.
KREATIVITAS DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH GEOMETRI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMPN 1 ARJOSARI KABUPATEN PACITAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF DAN GENDER Putri, Ariska Yuliana; Riyadi, Riyadi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (312.591 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to describe male and female students creativity of class VIII SMPN 1 Arjosari District of Pacitan that has a Field Dependent and Field Independent cognitive style in solving space geometric problem. This was a qualitative research. These subjects were taken using purposive sampling and snowball sampling. The subjects of this research were the students in the eight grade of SMPN 1 Arjosari. Data collection techniques in this research were GEFT, creativity test and interview. Techniques to validate the data were time triangulation. The data analysis technique used was the concept of Miles and Huberman consisted of data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The aspect of creativity in this research were consists of  four aspects, there were fluency,  flexibility, originality and elaboration. Students less creative if they do not meet the four aspects of creativity, quite creative if they meet one, two and three aspects of creativity and creative if they meet the four aspects of creativity. The results showed that male students that have Field Dependent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet one of the creativity aspects which is fluency. The male students that have Field Independent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet two creativity aspects which are fluency and elaboration. The female students that have Field Dependent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet two creativity aspects which are fluency and elaboration. The female students that have Field Independent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet three creativity aspects which are fluency, flexibility and elaboration. So the male and female students that have Field Dependent and Field Independent have a quite creative but it are different in each aspect of creativity.Keywords: creativity, problem solving, cognitive style, gender.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED INSTRUCTION DAN RECIPROCAL TEACHING PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN WONOGIRI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Mahendrawan, Ersam; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (316.176 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to know: (1) which one of the learning models gave a better achievement between problem based instruction, reciprocal teaching, or conventional, (2) which one of the students with types of learning style had a better achievement between students with visual, auditory, or kinesthetic, (3) at each learning style types, which one of the learning models gave a better achievement between problem based instruction, reciprocal teaching, or conventional, (4) at each the learning models, which one of the students with types of learning style had a better achievement between students with visual, auditory, or kinesthetic. The population of the research was the eighth class students of Junior High School at Wonogiri regency on academic year 2013/2014 and the sample was students from SMP Negeri 1 Slogohimo, SMP Negeri 1 Jatipurno and SMP Negeri 4 Jatisrono which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. This was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the data analysis, it was concluded as follows. 1) Problem based instruction gave better achievement than reciprocal teaching, conventional gave the same achievement as problem based instruction and reciprocal teaching, 2) The students with visual had better achievement than the students with auditory and kinesthetic, the students with auditory had better achievement than students with kinesthetic, 3) At the students with visual, reciprocal teaching gave the same achievement as problem based instruction and conventional, problem based instruction gave better achievement than conventional. At the students with auditory, problem based instruction gave better achievement than reciprocal teaching, conventional gave better achievement than reciprocal teaching and gave the same achievement as problem based instruction. At the students with kinesthetic, problem based instruction gave the same achievement as reciprocal teaching and conventional, 4) In reciprocal teaching, the students with visual had better achievement than the students with auditory, the students with kinesthetic had the same achievement as the students with visual and auditory. In problem based instruction, the students with visual had the same achievement as the students with auditory and had better achievement than the students with kinesthetic, the students with auditory had better achievement than the students with kinesthetic. In conventional model, the students with visual had the same achievement as the students with auditory and kinesthetic.Keywords: Problem Based Instruction, Reciprocal Teaching, Learning Style, Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LC 5E DISERTAI AFL PADA MATERI PRISMA DAN LIMAS DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT Wibowo, Guritno Ari; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (288.567 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research investigated the effect of using Learning Cycle 5E model using AfL in Mathematics course achievement viewed from Adversity Quotient. The quasi experimental research design was employed on this research. The technique analysis data used two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cell frequencies at 0,05 level of significance. The results show as follows 1) LC 5E with AfL model gave better Mathematics course achievement than the one without AfL and conventional model, and LC 5E without AfL gave better Mathematics course achievement than conventional model. 2) The students who are climber have better Mathematics course achievement than camper and quitter, and  the students who are camper have similar Mathematics achievement compared to quitter. 3) In LC 5E with AfL model, the climber category students Mathematics achievements are better than the ones who are camper and quitter, and the camper category students Mathematics achievements were better than the ones who are quitter. In LC 5E model, the climber category students Mathematics achievements are better than the ones who are camper and quitter, and the Mathematics achievements of camper category students were similar with the ones who are quitter. In the conventional model, whether climber, camper, or quitter have the same Mathematics course achievement. 4) Mathematics course achievement of climber category students was the same whether when they were given LC 5E with AfL or LC 5E, on the other hand those are better than the conventional model. The students who are camper category had better Mathematics achievement when they were given LC 5E include AfL and LC 5E than when were given conventional model, however those students had the same Mathematics achievement whether when they were given LC 5E or conventional model. The quitter category students had the same Mathematics achievement when they were given LC 5E with AfL, LC 5E, or conventional model.Keywords: Learning model, LC 5E, Assessment for Learning, Adversity Quotient.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN METODE PENEMUAN TERBIMBING PADA MATERI KUBUS DAN BALOK DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL DAN GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA Hidayat, Abdul Aziz; Riyadi, Riyadi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (290.012 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the difference of learning achievement in Mathematics on the learning of Cubes and Cuboids in each learning model viewed from the spatial abilities and the cognitive styles. This research used the quasi experimental research with the factorial design of 3x3x2. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the three-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research are as follows. 1) The students instructed with the NHT learning model with guided discovery method have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed with the NHT learning model and those with the direct learning model, and the students instructed with the NHT learning model have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the direct learning model. 2) The students with the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics. 3) The students with the cognitive style of field independent have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the cognitive style of field dependent. 4). In each category of the spatial abilities, the students instructed with the NHT learning model with guided discovery method have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed with the NHT learning model and those with the direct learning model, and the students instructed with the NHT learning model have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the direct learning model. 5) In each category of the spatial abilities, the students instructed with the NHT learning model with guided discovery method have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed with the NHT learning model and those with the direct learning model, and the students instructed with the NHT learning model have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the direct learning model.Keywords: NHT, guided discovery, spatial abilities,  and cognitive styles.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SQUARE DENGAN METODE QUESTION STUDENT HAVE DAN THINK TALK WRITE PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SLEMAN TP 2013/2014 Asy’ari, Asy’ari; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (331.424 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objektive of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from learning independence of the students. The learning models compared were the TPSq learning model with the question student have method, the TTW learning model, and the conventional learning model. This study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3×3 factorial design. The study population was all of grade VIII students of State Junior Secondary School in Sleman regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples in this study amounted to 262 students with the details of 87 students for experiment 1 and 87 for experiments 2 and 88 for the control class. The data collected instrument used mathematics achievement tests and a questionnaire of student’s learning  independence. Based on the hypothesis testing can be concluded as follows. (1) The learning achievement of the students treated with TPSq learning model  with the question student have method was as good as that of  those with the TTW learning model. In addition, students’ learning achievement treated by TPSq model with question student have method and TTW better than students treated by conventional learning model. (2) Students’ learning achievement which has high learning independence had better achievement than students who have moderate and low independence. In addition, students who have moderate learning independence had better achievement than students who have low learning independence. (3) In the TPSq learning model with the question student have method, TTW and conventional learning model, the students’ learning achievement who have high learning independence had better achievement than moderate and low learning independence, in addition the students’ learning achievement who have moderate learning independence had better achievement than students who have low learning independence. (4) In the learning independence category of high, moderate or low, the learning achievement of the students treated with TPSq learning model with the question student have method and TTW learning model was equally good. In addition, students’ learning achievement treated by TPSq  learning model with the question student have method and TTW learning model had better achievement than students treated by conventional learning model.Keywords: Think Pair Square (TPSq), Question Student Have, Think Talk Write (TTW), and Student’s Learning Independence.
ANALISIS PROSES PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH (PROBLEM BASED LEARNING) MATEMATIKA DENGAN PENDEKATAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC APPROACH ) DI SMA NEGERI 1 JOGOROGO KELAS X TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013 / 2014 KABUPATEN NGAWI Rahmawati, Arum Dwi Rahmawati Dwi; Riyadi, Riyadi; Subanti, Sri
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (297.388 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to describe the planning, implementation process of learning undertaken by teachers of mathematics and constraints experienced during the process of mathematical problem-based learning with a scientific approach in class X SMAN 1 Jogorogo. This research was a qualitative study. These subject are taken using purposive sampling. The subjects of this study were the teacher math in class X. Data collection techniques in this study were documentation, interviews and observations. Techniques to validate that the data source triangulation and triangulation time. The data analysis technique used was the concept of Miles and Huberman consists of data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The results showed that the planning process of mathematical problem-based learning with a scientific approach was not maximal yet, seen in the preparation of lesson plans which teachers only see examples of other schools and only see a reference to the syllabus. Implementation of the learning process is done the math teacher in class X SMAN 1 Jogorogo was not maximal yet. Visible in the indicator 5M on core activities are observing, asking, gather information, and communicate their associates have not done all. In observing the activities of students had no difficulty, however, go into the next phase indicator and students are still difficulties in doing so. In the event of  problem making students ask questions, lack of motivation and imagination. Collect information on the activities of students also have difficulty in learning resources are used only for math books grade students associate X. At this stage also looks still difficulty in processing information, although sometimes the teacher has given direction that the students tried to process the information that has been obtained. At that last stage  quite well in communicating the results, good enough student responses revealed the results even though the teacher had to call one of the students without first. Overcoming the problems found in the process of mathematical problem-based learning with a scientific approach to teacher always gives motivation at any stage of learning and trying to develop a problem-based learning with a scientific approach. Keywords: PBL, Scientific Approach
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PROBLEM POSING PADA POKOK BAHASAN PELUANG DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS XI SMK DI KABUPATEN BOYOLALI TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014 Bahktiar, Hidayat; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (435.783 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of Think Pair Share (TPS) with Problem Posing, Think Pair Share (TPS) or conventional, (2) which one have better in mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (3) in each learning model, which one have better mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (4) in each student’s level of Adversity Quotient which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing, TPS or conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students class XI majors group technology, health and agriculture of SMK in Boyolali. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the documentation of mathematics achievement, questionnaire of Adversity Quotient and test of mathematics achievement. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows: (1) learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than model of TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional, (2) the students having climbers and campers had same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better  achievement than those having quitters, (3) in each learning model, the students having climbers and campers had the same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better achievement than those having quitters, (4) in each Adversity Quotient, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional.Key words: Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Posing, and Adversity Quotient (AQ)
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DAN LEARNING CYCLE 5E (LC5E) PADA MATERI TRIGONOMETRI DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA SMA/MA NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Nurcahyo, Andriawan; Sujadi, Imam; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (279.11 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of research was to determine the effect of learning models on  learning achievement viewed from the students learning activities. The learning models compared were two stray two stay (TSTS), learning cycle 5E (LC5E) and direct learning. This research method was quasi – experimental using the factorial design 3x3. The Population of this research was all students in the tenth grade of High School / MA in Karanganyar in the academic year of 2013/2014. The Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The total samples in this research were 340 students (113 students for TSTS class, 113 students for LC5E class and 114 students for direct learning model). The proposed hypothesis of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of this research were as follow: (1) cooperative learning model TSTS, LC5E and direct learning model have the same achievement in  trigonometry. (2) students having high learning activities of mathematics study have the same achievement with those having medium learning activities, students having high learning activities of mathematics have better achievement than those having low learning activities, and students having medium learning activities have the same achievement with those having low learning activities in the trigonometry. (3) In the category of learning activities, students having high, medium and low, learning model TSTS, LC5E and direct learning model, have the same achievement in trigonometry. (4) In the learning model  TSTS and LC5E, students having high, medium and low learning activities have the same achievement trigonometry. For direct learning model, students having high learning activities have the same achievement with those having low learning actvities, students having high learning activities have better achievement than those having low learning activities, and students having medium learning activities have the same achievement with those having low learning activities.Keywords: TSTS, LC5E, Students Learning Activities and Learning Achievement  
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PROBLEM POSING TIPE WITHIN SOLUTION POSING, TIPE PRE SOLUTION POSING DAN TIPE POST SOLUTION POSING PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN BANJARNEGARA Santosa, Farah Heniati; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (279.11 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This aims of the research were to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from reasoning ability of thr students. The learning models compared were the Problem Posing model type: Within Solution Posing, Pre Solution Posing, Post Solution Posing and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 4x3. The population of the research was all students in Grade VIII of Junior Secondary Schools of Banjarnegara Regency. The samples of the research were chosen by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 316 students. The instruments used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and test of reasoning ability. Pre-requisite tests used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it shows that the populations have same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data were examined by using one-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. Hypothesis was examined by using two-way analysis of variance with unbalance cells followed multiple comparative test using Scheffe method. The result of the research showed as follows. (1) Problem Posing model type within solution posing gave better achievement than Problem Posing type Pre Solution Posing, type post Solution Posing and direct learning model, whereas Problem Posing model type Pre Solution Posing gave better achievement than Problem Posing type Post solution Posing and direct learning model. Meanwhile, Problem Posing model type Post Solution Posing gave better achievement than learning direct model. (2) Students who had high reasoning ability got better achievement than students who had medium or low reasoning ability, whereas students who had medium reasoning ability, got better achievement than students who had low reasoning ability.(3) in every learning model, students who had high reasoning ability got better achievement than students having medium or low reasoning ability. Meanwhile, students who had medium reasoning ability got better achievement than students who had low reasoning ability. (4) In every category of reasoning ability Problem Posing model type within solution posing gave better achievement than Problem Posing type Pre Solution Posing, type Post Solution Posing and direct learning model, whereas Problem Posing model type Pre Solution Posing gave better achievement than Problem Posing type Post solution Posing and direct learning model. Meanwhile, Problem Posing model type Post Solution Posing gave better achievement than direct learning model.Keyword: Problem Posing Type: Within Solution Posing, Pre Solution Posing, Post Solution Posing, mathematic achievement, and reasoning ability.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Hidayat Abdul Razak Abi Fadila Achmad Ridwan, Achmad Adeyanto, Rizki Adi Soeprijanto Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Syawaludin Ahmad, Ahmad Aip Badrujaman Aisyah Senja Mustika Aji Permana Putra Ali Fakhrudin Ali Fakhrudin, Ali Ali Imron Amiratih Siti Aisyah Andi Setiawan Andriawan Nurcahyo, Andriawan Anesa Surya Anggraheni Marsella Bella Astuti Anggreini, Dewi Anita Dewi Utami Anna Setyowati Annisa Ayu Kuserawati Annisa Fatiah Aprianif, Aprianif Ardiantoro, Gigih Ardiyani, Shila Majid Arifa Apriliana, Arifa Arinta Rara Kirana Ariska Yuliana Putri Ariyanto, Stefanus Timonora Wahyu Arsa’ad Kurniadi Arum Dwi Rahmawati Dwi Rahmawati, Arum Dwi Rahmawati Dwi Arumingtyas, Pramesti Asih Duwi Mawartini Asrowi Asrowi Asy’ari Asy’ari Asy’ari, Asy’ari Atik Wahyuni Aulia Musla Mustika Aulia Musla Mustika Aulia Musla Mustika author Ari Suningsih Awaluddin Tjalla Berti Dyah Permatasari Broto Apriliyanto Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Burhan Mustaqim Cahyaningsih, Eny Chanthoeurn, Dock Darmono, Prasetiyo Budi Desy Nur Wulandari Desy Nur Wulandary Dewi Ariyanti Dewi Kurniasari, Dewi Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Dhani Nur Hendrayanto Diana Tri Purnamasari Diananda, Amita Diari Indriati Dinny Devi Triana Dita Qondiyana Djumaliningsih, Nosa Putri Dwi Isna Wardani Dwi Yuni Pramugarini Dwiani Listya Kartika, Dwiani Listya E.P.U, Moertiningsih Edi Irawan Edi Irawan Edi Irawan Eka Agustina Khairunnisa Eka Nur Azizah Elisabet Dyah Kusuma Endah Asmarawati, Endah Endah Wulantina, Endah Endang Sri Handayani ERLAN SISWANDI Erni Susanti Ernie Novriyanti Ersam Mahendrawan Evi Novitasari Faradina Nilam Zulfa Farah Heniati Santosa, Farah Heniati Ferdian Achmad Fika Widya Pratama Fitri Andika Nurussafa’at, Fitri Andika Fitriani, Nur Syarifah Fransiska Januarti Gusman Gatut Iswahyudi Gesti Ayu Diah Asera Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi Gunarhadi, Gunarhadi Gunawansyah Gunawansyah, Gunawansyah Guritno Ari Wibowo Hadi Mulyono Hadiyah Hadiyah Hadiyah Hadiyah Halimah Halimah Hanafiah, Anis Hapsari, Alfonsa Maria Sofia Hartono Hartono Hartono, Edy Hasan Mahfud Hasanah, A.K Uswatun Hermawan, Yudi Hesa Resti Arumanda Hesti Yuni Ayu Lestari Hidayat Bahktiar, Hidayat Hidayat, Edisut Taufik Hidayat, Edisut Taufik Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh I.R. Widianto Atmojo Ibnu Sadono Idam Ragil Widianto Atmojo Idam Ragil Widianto Atmojo Ikhsan Abdul Latif Ikrar Pramudya Ikrar Pramudya Ikrar Pramudya, Ikrar Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Imam Wijaya, Henry Putra Indah Slamet Budiarti Indar Diasmi Aulianisa Indriana Dewi Irawan, Edi Irma Ayuwanti Irnistisia, Firna Isnaeni Umi Machromah Iswahyudi, Gatut Iswanti, Partia Iva Sarifah Ivana Ivana Ivana Jeany Maria Fatima, Jeany Maria Joko Daryanto Joko Daryanto Joko Susilo Juitaning Mustika Juliana Nasution Karsono Karsono Kartika Chrysti Suryandari Kartono - Kuncara, Adi Wahyu Kurniasari Elsya Rosyana Kurniasari, Dewi Kurniawan, Sandra Bayu Kurniawati, Rina Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Laili Mas Ulliyah Hasan Lenny Puspita Dewi Lestari, Hesti Yuni Ayu Lies Lestari Lies Lestari Lina Utami Lis Maryani Luthfiana Mirati, Luthfiana Luthfiyah Nanda Bertha Armelia M Ismail Sriyanto M Ismail Sriyanto M Ismail Sriyono M. Ismail Sriyanto M. Ismail Sriyanto Maghfiroh Yanuarti Makmun , Lutfan Mania Roswitha Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Matsuri Matsuri Matsuri, Matsuri Maya Novita Sari Merrydian, Siska Miftachudin, Miftachudin Mubarokah, Wida Wahidah Mufarrihah, Iftitaahul Muhamad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Gazali Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Ismail Sriyanto Muhammad Syarif Hidayatussalam Muhammad Tareh Aziz Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyaningrum Lestari, Mulyaningrum Mustamimah, Siti Mustika, Aisyah Senja Najmul Laila Nanang Adie Setyawan Nia Apriyanti Niendya Ashiefa Parahita Nina Nurmasari Nindya Ashiefa Parahita Ningroom, Rita Arfi Astuti Nisra, Nisraeni Nok Yeni Heryaningsih, Nok Yeni Noor Hidayati Noor Hidayati Nosa Putri Djumaliningsih Noviah, Ema Novita Dwi Ashohib Nur Ainsah H. Saleh Nur Insani Nuraini Muhassanah Nurcahya, Fikri Nurudin, M. Nurul Amalia K W Nyoto Nyoto Nyoto Nyoto, Nyoto Ocy, Dwi Rismi Oka Tamaraningtyas Oktavia Oktavia Patrisius Afrisno Udil, Patrisius Afrisno Peduk Rintayati Prabowo, Haniftia Haqqiendini Pratama, Riska Widya Pratiwi, Rani Prestanti Hayuningtyas Priyogo, Adi Puji Ayuni Puji Ayuni Purwono, Edi Rany Widyastuti Rejeki, Suprapti Rima Aksen Cahdriyana Rima Aksen Cahdriyana Rini, Indah Mustika Rintayati, Peduk Riska Widya Pratama Riswandha, Septian Henry Rizqi Aditya Nugraha Rosyida, Entyka Mayhasti S Retnowati S Siswanto S Subanti Sajidan Sajidan Samsi Suryanjani Sandra Bayu Kurniawan Saptianing, Saptianing Saptono, Ari Saputri, Alinggi Nindi Saputri, Dwi Yuniasih Selvi Marcellia Septi Triyani Sheptian, Riky Sherly Mayfana Panglipur Yekti Shila Majid Ardiyani Shila Majid Ardiyani Sigit Pamungkas Sigit Rimbatmojo Siswanto Siswanto Siswanto Siswanto Siti Kamsiyati Siti Kamsiyati Siti Kamsiyati Siti Kamsiyati Siti Komsatun Sonny Ari Wibowo Sri Hartati Ningsih Sri Mardani Sri Marmoah Sri Subanti Sri Wahyuni Sri Yamtinah Sriyati, Sriyati Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Sugeng Priyanto, Sugeng Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Sujadi, Imam Sujadi, Imam Sujadi, Imam Sukarmin Sukma Perdana Prasetya Sulaiman Sulaiman Sumanah Sumanah Suprapti Rejeki Susilawati, Dyah Suwardi Suwardi Syarifah, Triana Jamilatus T A Kusmayadi T Dwi Hastuti Tambunan, Rifka Paulina Tanti Listiani, Tanti Tarmo, Tarmo Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Silaningsih Triana Jamilatus Syarifah Triyanto . Triyanto . Triyanto . Triyanto, Triyanto Tunggu Biyarti Twiningsih, Anik Tyas, Wahyu Handining Ulfa Masamah, Ulfa Ummi Rosyidah, Ummi V Kartikaningtyas Veronika Yusnita Andriani Prastika Via Yustitia Vita Purnamasari Vivi Fenty Anggraeny Wahyu Prihatiningrum Wahyumiarti Wahyumiarti, Wahyumiarti Wardani Rahayu Wibowo, Sonny Ari Widodo Widodo Yekti Putri Kusumaningtyas Yogi Bagus Dwi Cahyono Yuliana Yuliana Yulianti Yulianti Yulianti Yulianti Yuniarti, Titik Zara Mertiana RZ