p-Index From 2021 - 2026
26.061
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal USU LAW JOURNAL Jurnal Mahupiki INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia USU Journal of Legal Studies Abdimas Talenta : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat JURNAL MUQODDIMAH : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Riset Sosial Humaniora (KAGANGA) Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH JURNAL MERCATORIA Unes Law Review Gorontalo Law Review Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Majalah Ilmiah Warta Dharmawangsa JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Res Nullius Law Journal JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Darma Agung ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum SOSEK: Jurnal Sosial dan Ekonomi Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Law_Jurnal Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences (FJAS) JURNAL JUSTIQA Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Tjut Nyak Dhien Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Journal of Comprehensive Science Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa Semarang Law Review Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi EduYustisia Jurnal Edukasi Hukum Dharmawangsa: International Journal of the Social Sciences, Education and Humanitis Mamangan Social Science Journal Al-Qanun: Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Hukum Islam International Conference on Health Science, Green Economics, Educational Review and Technology (IHERT) JURNAL GOVERNANCE OPINION International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects) Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Recht Studiosum Law Review AL-SULTHANIYAH Lex Lectio Law Journal Mahadi : Indonesia Journal of Law Community: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Legal Empowerment: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Gloria Justitia Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) INSPIRING LAW JOURNAL Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia GRONDWET Journal of Constitutional Law and State Administrative Law Asian Multidisciplinary Research Journal of Economy and Learning Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues Binamulia Hukum Jurnal Hukum Statuta Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy International Journal of Law Analytic Jurnal NORMATIF Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia ULJLS Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies Dialogia Iuridica Jurnal Hukum Pidana Indonesia International Conference on Social Science
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

PENERAPAN ASAS ULTIMUM REMEDIUM SEBAGAI BENTUK PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERBUATAN CURANG (FRAUD) PADA PENYELENGGARAAN PROGRAM JAMINAN KESEHATAN NASIONAL (STUDI DI BPJS KESEHATAN KEDEPUTIAN WILAYAH I) Hafizam Addini; Mahmud Mulyadi; Muhammad Ekaputra
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol. 9 No. 4 (2026): August 2026 (1)
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v9i4.6882

Abstract

Fraud dalam Program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) merupakan salah satu permasalahan yang berpotensi menimbulkan kerugian keuangan negara serta mengganggu keberlanjutan sistem jaminan kesehatan nasional. Penanganan fraud sering kali menimbulkan perdebatan mengenai penggunaan sanksi pidana atau sanksi administratif. Dalam perspektif hukum pidana modern, asas ultimum remedium menempatkan hukum pidana sebagai sarana terakhir setelah upaya hukum lain, terutama sanksi administratif, tidak lagi efektif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis praktik penanganan fraud JKN, penerapan mekanisme non-penal, dan implementasi asas ultimum remedium dalam penyelesaian perkara fraud pada BPJS Kesehatan Kedeputian Wilayah I, khususnya wilayah kerja BPJS Kesehatan Cabang Medan yang meliputi Kota Medan, Kota Binjai, dan Kabupaten Langkat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang didukung data lapangan, dengan sifat penelitian preskriptif Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik penanganan fraud JKN di BPJS Kesehatan Cabang Medan dilakukan melalui mekanisme administratif yang sistematis, dimulai dari deteksi, klarifikasi, audit, verifikasi, hingga pemberian sanksi administratif. Selama periode 2023–2025 ditemukan 43 kasus fraud dengan nilai kerugian yang seluruhnya berhasil dipulihkan melalui pengembalian kerugian dan pembayaran denda administratif. Jenis fraud yang ditemukan didominasi manipulasi klaim pelayanan kesehatan, seperti upcoding, phantom billing, manipulasi diagnosis, dan penagihan yang tidak sesuai. Penerapan mekanisme non-penal dilakukan melalui sanksi bertingkat berupa teguran, pengembalian kerugian, denda administratif, hingga penghentian kerja sama dengan fasilitas kesehatan yang melakukan pelanggaran berat. Seluruh kasus diselesaikan melalui mekanisme administratif tanpa adanya pelaporan kepada aparat penegak hukum dan tidak ditemukan pelanggaran berulang oleh pelaku yang sama.
Penguatan Kapasitas Remaja Melalui Edukasi Hukum Sebagai Upaya Preventif Risiko Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang di Sumatera Utara Rosmalinda Rosmalinda; Nabila Afifah Salwa; Siti Khairunnissa; Mahmud Mulyadi; Mohammad Effan Djodie; Farhans Mahendra Syam
Legal Empowerment: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Vol 4 No 2 (2026): Legal Empowerment: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum
Publisher : UPPM STIH Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/legalempowerment.v4i2.519

Abstract

Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (TPPO) merupakan salah satu bentuk kejahatan yang berdampak serius terhadap perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM), khususnya bagi kelompok usia muda yang memiliki tingkat kerentanan. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan meningkatkan literasi hukum dan kesadaran remaja dalam mengenali serta mencegah risiko TPPO di Sumatera Utara. Kegiatan dilaksanakan melalui edukasi hukum berbasis sekolah berupa sosialisasi, penyampaian materi, dan diskusi interaktif kepada siswa Yayasan Islamic Centre Sumatera Utara. Materi mencakup konsep TPPO, modus operandi, faktor risiko, hak korban, serta mekanisme perlindungan hukum. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan peningkatan pemahaman peserta mengenai bahaya TPPO, kemampuan mengenali pola perekrutan yang berisiko, serta kesadaran untuk menggunakan media digital secara kritis dan aman. Edukasi hukum berbasis sekolah berpotensi menjadi strategi preventif dalam memperkuat kesadaran hukum dan kapasitas perlindungan diri remaja terhadap TPPO.
Peran Runggu dalam Tindak Pidana pada Masyarakat Adat Karo Asri Rehmana Perangin Angin; Mahmud Mulyadi; Rosnidar Sembiring
Kaganga:Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Riset Sosial Humaniora Vol. 9 No. 4 (2026): Kaganga: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Riset Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31539/g5yymc49

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the types of criminal offenses resolved through Runggu in relation to the Indonesian Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023), to examine the effectiveness of Runggu in resolving criminal cases, and to analyze the process of criminal dispute resolution through Runggu in Lau Garut Village, Mardingding District, Karo Regency. This research employs an empirical legal research method with a sociological juridical approach. Data were obtained through interviews with the village head, customary leaders, perpetrators, victims, and local community members, supported by literature review. The data were analyzed qualitatively using legal pluralism theory, living law theory, and restorative justice theory. The results of the study indicate that the existence of Runggu as a living law is still recognized and practiced by the Karo community in resolving certain criminal offenses, particularly minor offenses that do not cause widespread harm. Resolution through Runggu is still possible as long as it does not conflict with positive law provisions and does not involve serious criminal offenses under state jurisdiction. Runggu is considered effective because it is able to resolve conflicts quickly, simply, and at low cost, while prioritizing the restoration of social relationships between perpetrators and victims through the concept of dame adat (customary peace). The resolution process is carried out through deliberation involving the village head, customary leaders, families of both parties, and the Rakut Sitelu structure. The resulting decisions generally include restitution, compensation payments, customary apologies, and other customary sanctions aimed at restoring social balance in the community. Thus, Runggu plays an important role as a restorative justice-based mechanism for resolving criminal offenses that remains relevant and effective in maintaining order and harmony within the Karo indigenous community in Lau Garut Village. Keywords: Criminal Offenses, Karo Customary Law, Legal Pluralism, Living law, Restorative Justice, Runggu.
CRIMINAL LAW POLICY CONCERNING PROVIDING RESTITUTION TO VICTIMS OF CRIMES OF SERIOUS PERSECUTION Fahrizal S. Siagian; Mahmud Mulyadi; Rosmalinda Rosmalinda
Semarang Law Review (SLR) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/slr.v5i2.9806

Abstract

The crime of serious maltreatment is a form of physical abuse. Therefore, everyone has the right to apply for restitution. Lack of support from various elements makes this condition an obstacle experienced by law enforcement officials in the implementation of restitution for victims of serious maltreatment. There is no provision to force perpetrators of serious maltreatment to pay restitution decided by the court. This is an obstacle in the implementation of restitution in the Indonesian criminal justice system. The problems of this research are How is the Position of Restitution for Victims of Crime in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System? How is the Implementation of Restitution towards the Fulfilment of the Rights of Victims of Serious Offences? What is the Criminal Law Policy on the Provision of Restitution to Victims of Serious Offences in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System in the Future? The purpose of the research is to answer several problems in this study. This research uses normative juridical method with case, concept, and legislation approach. This research obtained results in the form of the Position of Restitution for Victims of Crime in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia has not been perfectly regulated so that it is considered not to accommodate justice for victims. Implementation of Restitution for Victims of Serious Offences has not been maximised, marked by many technical and non-technical obstacles that hinder restitution. Criminal Law Policy related to restitution for victims in the future is to formulate a policy so that restitution has the intensity of an obligation for the perpetrator to pay it and there must be an institution that pro-actively supervises the provision of restitution. The research initiated a reformulation of legal substance related to strengthening the essence of coercion and strict supervision in the provision of restitution to victims of serious maltreatment in the criminal justice system in Indonesia.AbstrakTindak pidana penganiayaan berat merupakan penyiksaan terhadap fisik manusia. Sehingga setiap orang berhak untuk mengajukan hak restitusi. Kurangnya dukungan dari berbagai elemen sehingga kondisi ini menjadi kendala yang dialami oleh aparat penegak hukum dalam implementasi restitusi bagi korban tindak pidana penganiayaan berat. Belum diaturnya upaya paksa bagi pelaku tindak pidana penganiayaan berat untuk membayar restitusi yang diputus di Pengadilan. Hal ini menjadi sebuah kendala dalam penerapan restitusi dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Permasalahan penelitian ini yaitu Bagaimana Kedudukan Restitusi Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana di dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia ? Bagaimana Implementasi Pemberian Restitusi Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak-hak Korban Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat ? Bagaimana Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Tentang Pemberian Restitusi Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia pada Masa yang Akan Datang ? Tujuan penelitian yakni menjawab beberapa permasalahan pada penelitian ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kasus, konsep, dan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini memperoleh hasil berupa Kedudukan Restitusi Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana di dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia belum sempurna diatur sehingga dinilai belum mengakomodir keadilan terhadap korban. Implementasi Pemberian Restitusi Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat belum maksimal yang ditandai dengan banyaknya kendala teknis maupun non-teknis yang menghambat restitusi. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana terkait restitusi bagi korban kedepannya adalah dengan memformulasi suatu kebijakan agar restitusi memiliki intensitas kewajiban bagi pelaku untuk membayarnya serta harus ada lembaga yang pro-aktif mengawasi pemberian restitusi ini. Penelitian menggagas adanya reformulasi substansi hukum terkait penguatan esensi upaya paksa dan pengawasan ketat dalam pemberian restitusi terhadap korban tindak pidana penganiayaan berat dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia.
Strengthening Rehabilitation Efforts for Drug Users: Field Study North Sumatra Provincial Narcotics Agency (BNNP) Sonita Simbolon; Mahmud Mulyadi; Mohammad Ekaputra
Al-Qanun: Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Hukum Islam Vol 7, No 2 (2026): Al-Qanun: Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58836/al-qanun.v7i2.30351

Abstract

Rehabilitation for drug addicts and victims of drug abuse is a criminal law policy that prioritizes a restorative approach as part of the criminal justice system. Despite its legal basis, the implementation of the rehabilitation policy still faces various obstacles that affect the effectiveness of legal protection for drug addicts. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the rehabilitation policy for drug addicts by the National Narcotics Agency of North Sumatra Province, identify obstacles to its implementation, and formulate efforts to optimize the rehabilitation policy from a criminal law perspective. This research uses an empirical juridical method with a legislative approach and a field approach. Data were obtained through a review of primary and secondary legal materials, supported by interviews and observations. The results indicate that the implementation of the rehabilitation policy at the National Narcotics Agency of North Sumatra has been carried out through an integrated assessment mechanism, medical and social rehabilitation, and cross-sectoral collaboration. However, its effectiveness is still affected by low public awareness of rehabilitation, the strong stigma against drug addicts, limited inter-agency coordination, and the suboptimal use of rehabilitation as an alternative solution for eligible addicts. The research findings confirm that the success of rehabilitation policies is not solely determined by legal substance, but also influenced by institutional effectiveness, inter-institutional coordination, and the legal culture of the community. This research contributes to strengthening drug addict rehabilitation policies by emphasizing the importance of optimizing a rehabilitative approach as part of criminal law policies oriented toward protecting the rights, restoring, and social reintegration of drug addicts.
Penegakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Kasus Penyerobotan Tanah Studi Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 1/Pid.B/2018/PN Mdn, dan Nomor 795/Pid.B/2016/PN Mdn Muhammad Reza Pahlevi Nasution; Saidin Saidin; Mahmud Mulyadi
ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Vol 8, No 2 (2026): ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum November
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/arbiter.v8i2.7406

Abstract

Land grabbing is a legal issue related to legal certainty, the protection of land rights, and criminal law enforcement. This study aims to analyze judges’ considerations in enforcing criminal law against land grabbing and the disparity in the judgments of the Medan District Court in Decision No. 1/Pid.B/2018/PN Mdn and Decision No. 795/Pid.B/2016/PN Mdn. This study employs a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach, using statutory, conceptual, analytical, and case approaches. Legal materials were obtained through library research and analyzed qualitatively. The results show that the differences in the judges’ considerations primarily concern the fulfillment of the elements of Article 385 paragraph (4) of the Indonesian Criminal Code and the proof of land rights. In Decision No. 1/Pid.B/2018/PN Mdn, ownership of the land remained disputed because the parties did not possess sufficiently strong evidence of ownership. Consequently, the defendants were released from all legal prosecution, while the determination of land ownership was considered to require prior resolution through civil proceedings. In contrast, in Decision No. 795/Pid.B/2016/PN Mdn, the land rights were established through Certificate of Ownership No. 2409 registered in the name of the victim-witness, whereas the defendant had no valid legal title and was sentenced to five months’ imprisonment. Therefore, the difference between the judgments does not merely indicate inconsistency in sentencing, but is influenced by differences in the legal facts, fulfillment of the elements of the offense, and evidentiary strength concerning land ownership in each case.
JUSTICE COLLABORATOR IN THE CRIMINAL ACT OF PREDICTIVE MURDER (Study Of The Decision Of The South Jakarta District Court) (Number: 798/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt.Sel) Ramlan Damanik; Mahmud Mulyadi; Rosmalinda
International Conference on Health Science, Green Economics, Educational Review and Technology Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): 9th IHERT (2025): IHERT (2025) FIRST ISSUE: International Conference on Health
Publisher : Universitas Efarina

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ihert.v7i1.502

Abstract

Justice Collaborator (Cooperating Witness) is a suspect, defendant, or convict who cooperates with law enforcement to uncover a crime in the same case. Justice Collaborator has a big role in uncovering certain crimes. Justice Collaborator also played a role in uncovering the premeditated murder case against Victim NYH who was an aide to FS who served as Head of Propam Division of the National Police Headquarters. The initial chronology presented in the police report after the incident was not premeditated murder, but rather a shooting incident between the Victim and another aide, namely RE. However, thanks to RE's courage in volunteering as a Justice Collaborator, the premeditated murder crime that occurred has been uncovered. This study discusses the problem of how the practices of determining justice collaborators in Indonesia, how the determination of justice collaborators on behalf of RE in the crime of premeditated murder, and how the legal considerations of the Panel of Judges in imposing criminal sanctions on justice collaborators on behalf of RE. The research method in this thesis uses a research method with a normative research type with a descriptive analytical research nature and a qualitative data analysis method, by examining the Decision of the South Jakarta District Court Number: 798/Pid.B/2022/PN. Jkt.Sel and laws and regulations and other legal materials related to the determination of justice collaborators in premeditated murder. The practice of determining Justice Collaborators in Indonesia is carried out based on the provisions of laws and regulations, including Law Number 31 of 2014 and SEMA Number 4 of 2011 with the requirements for determining justice collaborators, namelyjustice collaboratoris one of the perpetrators of a particular crime or a particular criminal case that he committed, not the main perpetrator in the crime and provided information as a witness in the trial process. Then against the Justice collaborator on behalf of RE who is the executor in the crime of premeditated murder, was determined as a justice collaborator with the consideration that the crime of premeditated murder he committed met the qualifications of a "certain case" with the indicator being another crime that resulted in the position of the witness and victim being faced with a very life-threatening situation and the fulfillment of the requirement that the justice collaborator in this decision is not the main perpetrator. For his role as a justice collaborator, RE was given a light sentence with a prison sentence of 1 (one) year and 6 (six) months with one of the considerationsThe victim's family has forgiven the defendant.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Alsa, Abdul Aziz Abdul Haris Abdul Munir Nasution Abul Khair Adhy Iswara Sinaga Adi Chandra Adi Mansar Aditya Pranata Kaban Ady Ranto, Eko Afdhila, Sri Afrizal Chair Nawar Agus Kristianto Sinaga Agusmidah Agusmidah Agusta Kanin Agustami Lubis Agustining Agustining Agustining Ahmad Fadly Aldi Subartono Aldri Aldri, Aldri Alfi Syahrin Alfi Syahrin, Alfi Alimuddin Sinurat Almunawar Sembiring Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Amru Eryandi Siregar Anditya, Ariesta Wibisono Andri Dharma Andriati, Syarifa Lisa Andrio Bukit Angeline Siahaan, Yohanna Anggi P. Harahap Anis Putri Miranda Daulay Annette Anasthasia Napitupulu Antonius Bangun Silitonga Antonius Leonard Tarigan Arfin Fachreza Arief Rezana Dislan Ariq Ablisar Arivai Nazaruddin Sembiring Armia Pahmi Aryandi, Aryandi Asri Rehmana Perangin Angin Astri Heiza Mellisa Aulia Annisa Azizah, Hanifah Bambang Rubianto Barus, Daniel Setiawan Bella Azigna Purnama Bella Azigna Purnama Bennaris Kaban Bismar Nasution Bismar Nasution Bismar Nasution Nasution Bismar Siregar, Bismar Bobbi Sandri Bornok Simanjuntak Brian Christian Telaumbanua Brunner, Emil Budi Bahreisy Budiawan, Sahala Valentino BUDIMAN GINTING Cardiana Harahap Cecep Priyayi Chainur Arrasyid Chairul Bariah Chandra Aulia Putra Chandra Purnama CHRISPO NATIO MUAL NATIO D. Shahreiza Dahlia Kesuma Dewi Danang Dermawan Daniel Clinton Daniel Setiawan Barus Daniel Siregar Darmawan Darmawan Dea Vony Nifili Zega Debreri Irfansyah Sembiring Dedi Harianto Delfiandi Delfiandi Delfiandi, Delfiandi Denny Reynold Octavianus Des Boy Rahmat Eli Zega DewiMaya Benadicta Barus Dikki Saputra Saragih Dimas B. Samuel Simanjuntak Dinda Dwi Andriyani Dinda Stevani Regar Dody Safnul Donny Alexander Donris Sihaloho Dwina Elfika Putri Dwina ELFIKA PUTRI Elfika Putri Edi Ikhsan Edi Suranta Sinulingga Edi Warman Edi Yunara Edi Yunara Edison Sumitro Situmorang Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman, Ediwarman Eduward Eduward Edy Ihkhsan Edy Ikhsan Edy Suranta Tarigan Edy Yunara Edy Yunara Effendy, Dicky Efraim Sihombing EKA ASTUTI Eka Supandi Lingga Eka Wijaya Silalahi Ekaputra, M. Ekaputra, Mohammad Eko Ady Ranto Eko Hartanto Elisa Yuliana Lumban Batu Elizabeth Purba ELLY SYAFITRI HARAHAP Elwi Danil Erick Jeremi Manihuruk Erman Syafrudianto Erwin Pangihutan Situmeang Ester Lauren Putri Harianja Fadilah Khoirinnisa Harahap Fahri Rahmadhani Fahrizal S. Siagian Faisal Akbar Faisal Akbar Nasution Faisal Akbar Nasution Faisal Rahmat Husein Simatupang Faiz Ahmed Illovi Fajar Rudi Manurung Farah Diba Batubara Farhans Mahendra Syam Ferdi Ferdy Saputra Ferimon Ferimon Ferimon, Ferimon Fernandes Edi Syahputra Silaban Fernando, Zico Junius Fickry Abrar Pratama Fitriani Fitriani Frans Affandhi Frans Martin Sihotang Fransiska Alemina Sembiring Fransiskus Xaverius Julanta Sinuraya Freddy VZ. Pasaribu FREDRIGK ROGATE Frendra AH AH Frima A Sitanggang Gibson Parsaoran Gilbeth Abiet Nego Sitindaon Giovani Giovani Gomgoman Simbolon Gultom, Steffy Suzani Meilina Gunawan Sinurat Gusmarani, Rica H. I. H, ferdinan Hady, Faisal Hafizam Addini Hafizhul Khair AM Hamdan, M Hanan Hanawi Aananda Putra Sitohang Hanifah Azizah Hanifah Azizah Hardy Primadi Hartono Hartono HASIM PURBA Hasim Purba Hasyim Purba Hendra Eko Triyulianto Heni Widiyani Henny Handayani Henry Sinaga Herbert Rumanang Herianto Herianto Herlina Sitorus Hia, Hipotesa Ibnu Afan Ibnu Affan Ibnu Affan Ibrahim Ali IBRAHIM, NURIJAH Iman Azahari Ginting Iman Rahmat Gulo Imanuel Sembiring Imanuel Sembiring Immanuel Colia Immanuel P Simamora Immanuel Simanjuntak INDRA PERMANA RAJA GUKGUK Iqbal Ramadhan Satria Prawira IRENE CRISTNA SILALAHI Irfan Santoso Irham Parlin Lubis Irwan Charles Sitompul Irzan Hafiandy Ismail Ginting Ismanto, Ade Jaya Ismawansa Ismawansa Isnaini Ivan Ghani Lubis Ivan Giovani sembiring Jamaluddin Mahasari Jefrianto Sembiring Jelly Leviza Jelly Leviza Jenda Riahta Silaban Jenggel Nainggolan Jeremia Sipahutar Jhon Leonardo Hutagalung Jhoni Fernando Sinaga Jhordy M.H. Nainggolan Jimmy Donovan Johannes Hutapea Joko Pranata Situmeang Jonathan Hasudungan Hasibuan Josia Suarta Sembiring Judika Atma Togi Manik Julanta Sinuraya, Fransiskus Xaverius Juliani Prihartini Julisman Julisman Junhaidel Samosir Juni Kristian Telaumbanua Jusmadi Sikumbang Kartina Pakpahan Kayaruddin Hasibuan Keke Wismana Purba Khairul Imam Khomaidi Hambali Siambaton Kondios Meidarlin Pasaribu Kristin Manurung Kumaedi Kuo Bratakusuma Leonard Pandapotan Sinaga Lisa Andriansyah Rizal Lisa Andrianti, Syarifah Liza erwina Lubis, Ivan Ghani Lubis, Yeti Meliany M Budi Hendrawan M Ekaputra M Ekaputra M Ekaputra M Hamdani M. Ainul Yaqin M. Eka Putra M. Ekaputra M. Ekaputra M. Hamdan M. Hamdan M. Hamdan M. Hamdan M. Harris Sofian Hasibuan M. Iqbal Asnawi M. Nur Hidayat Manurung M.Eka Putra M.Ekaputra M.Ekaputra M.Jalil Sembiring Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablizar Madiasa Ablizar Madiasa Albisar Madiasa Albisar, Madiasa MAHMUL SIREGAR Mahmul Siregar Malto S. Datuan Mangasitua Simanjuntak Manihuruk, Erick Jeremi Manik, Bisker Manurung, Eva Valentina Maria Marihot Tua Silitonga Mario Tondi Natio Marissa Hutabarat Marlina Marlina Marlina Marlina Marlina Marlina Marlina, Marlina Marthin Fransisco Manihuruk Martina Indah Amalia Marudut Hutajulu Maryani Melindawati Marzuki Marzuki Marzuki Marzuki Maslon Ambarita Mhd Hamdan Mikael Gomgom Marisi Sihombing Mirza Erwinsyah Mirza Nasution Mirza Nasution Mirza Nasution Mohammad Effan Djodie Mohd Din Mohd. Din Muhammad Adlan Nasution Muhammad Daud Siregar Muhammad Ekaputra Muhammad Ekaputra Muhammad Hamdan Muhammad Hamdan Muhammad Husairi Muhammad Hykna Kurniawan Lubis Muhammad Junaidi Muhammad Nuh Muhammad Reza Pahlevi Nasution Muhammad Ridwanta Tarigan Muhammad Tezar Emiral Muhammad Yusuf Siregar Muhammd Hamdan Mukidi, Mukidi Mulya Hakim Solichin Mustamam, Mustamam Nabila Afifah Salwa Naibaho, Kinski Vania Nainggolan, Rani Oslina Napitupulu, Bani Praseto Nara Palentina Naibaho Nasrun Pasaribu Nasution, Aulia Arif Natali Masita Nicholas Teo Pan Nida Syafwani Nasution NINGRUM NATASYA SIRAIT Nixson Nixson Novi Rahmawati Novia Masda Barus Nur Fadillah Rizky Nasution Nur Istiono Nurijah Ibrahim Nurmala wati Nurmala Waty Nurmalawaty Nurpanca Sitorus Nurul Amelia Nurul Efridha Nurul Qoedatul Khoiriyah Siregar Ocktresia. M. Sihite OK Saidin Oki Yudhatama Oloan Ikhwan Maruli Tua Sinaga Paian Tumanggor Panca Hutagalung Panca Sarjana Putra Pane, Lorita Tupaida Panji Nugraha Pantun Marojahan Simbolon Pardede, Rendra Yoki Parlindungan Silalahi, Juliandi Parlindungan Twenti Saragih Pasaribu, Rizaldy Pasaribu, Theo Yose Pratama Pendastaren Tarigan Perdana Sani, Tantra Phio Tuah Reysario Sinaga Pranggi Siagian Putra, Panca Sarjana Putri Mauliza Fonna R. Sapto Hendri Boedi Soesatyo Rabithah Nazran Rachmatullah Rachmatullah Rafidah Sinulingga Rafiqoh lubis Rahmadhani, Sylvia Ramadhan, Rinaldi Ramadhan, Ryan Fadly Ramlan Damanik Ramli Tambunan Rangkuti, Liza Hafidzah Yusuf Ranu Wijaya Rasina Padeni Nasution Regi Putra Manda Restu Y.S Zendrato Riamor Bangun Ricky Adryan Siahaan Rima Melati Situmorang Rina Melati Sitompul Rina Melati Sitompul Rinaldi Ramadhan Rio Nababan Ritonga, Fani Holidayani Ritonga, Muhammad Sacral Rizkan Zulyadi Rizki Dwi Putra Siregar Rizky, Fajar Khaify Robby Irsan Robert Robert Robert Valentino Tarigan Robert, Robert Robles Arnold L Rocky Marbun, Rocky Ronald F. C. Sipayung Roni Pardamean Gultom Ronny Nicolas Sidabutar Roro Vanesia Pandiangan Rosmalinda Rosmalinda Rosmalinda, Rosmalinda Rosnidar Sembiring Rosnidar Sembiring Rosy, Deuis Rina Rozhi Ananda Sitepu Rumahorbo, Alberth Mangasi Runtung Runtung Rusdi Marzuki Rusdi Rusdi Ruth Gladys Sembiring Ryan Fadly Ramadhan Saidin Saidin Saidin Samandhohar Munthe Samuel Marpaung SAMUEL PEBRIANTO MARPAUNG PEBRIANTO Sandy, Mahmud Isyac Kurnia SANGGAM BILL CLINTON SIMANJUNTAK Sari Mariska Siregar Saur Sihaloho Sebayang, Dona Martinus Sebayang, Ekinia Karolin Secsio Jimec Nainggolan Sembiring, Debreri Irfansyah Sianturi, Senior Sihombing, Dedy Chandra Sihombing, Eka NAM Sihotang, Frans Martin Silvana Silalahi, Ririn SIMAMORA, DANIEL Simanjuntak, Delima Mariaigo Simaremare, Yoseanna Anastasya Sinaga, Dwi Natal Ngai Santoso Sinaga, Esron Sinaga, Oloan Ikhwan Maruli Tua Sipayung, Ronald Fredy Christian Sirait, Rara Pitaloka Sitepu, Yosua Prima Arihta Siti Khairunnissa Sitorus, Raja Pranata Situmorang, Rima Melati Sonita Simbolon Sonya Airini Batubara Soritua Agung Tampubolon Spesio Panjaitan, Kevin Theodosus Sri Delyanti Steffy Suzani Meilina Gultom Sudarma Setiawan Sugeng Riyadi Sugirhot Marbun Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Sukarja, Detania Sunarmi Sunarmi Sunarmi Sunarmi Sunarmi, Sunarmi Supian Natalis Suprayitno Suprayitno Surbakti, Benny Avalona Surya Ari Wibowo Surya Sofyan Hadi Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Syafrddin Kalo Syafruddin Kalo Syafruddin S. Hasibuan Syafruddin Sulung Hasibuan Syafrudin Kalo Syahron Hasibuan Syamsul Arifin Syarifa Lisa Andriati Syarifah Lisa Syarifah Lisa Andriati Syarifah Tigris Syarifuddin Kalo Tambunan, Stephy Anggi Eliza Tampubolon, Christya Graceilla Putri Tan Kamello Tan Kamello Tanjung, Wiranti TANTRA KHAIRUL Tantra Perdana Tarigan, Vita Cita Emia Tarigan, Yos Arnold Taryono Raharja Taufik Siregar Taufik Taufik Teddy Lazuardi Syahputra Telaumbanua, Brian Christian Tengku Keizerina Devi A Thahir, Irfan Farid Themis Simaremare Theo Yose Pratama Pasaribu Timbul TM Aritonang Tito Travolta Hutauruk Tody Valery Tommy Aditia Sinulingga Tony Tony Topo Santoso Triono Eddy Trisna, Wessy Tumanggor, Paian Tumpal Utrecht Napitupulu Tunggul Yohannes Ucox Pratua Nugraha Utari Maharany Barus Utary Maharany Barus Victor Ziliwu Viranti, Syahliza Vita Cita Emia Tarigan Wendell, Raynaldo Divian Wenggedes Frensh Weni Julianti S Wessy Trisna Wessy Trisna Wessy Trisna Wilson Bugner Pasaribu Wira Prayatna Wisjnu Wardhana Yakub Frans Sihombing Yana Armaretha Pinayungan Yetti Q.H. Simamora Yolanda Sari KS Yona Lamerossa Ketaren Yoseanna Anastasya Simaremare Yoyok Adi Syahputra Yudhistira Frandana Yuliani, Lisa Yulida, Devi Yunus Husein Yunus Husein Zikrul Hakim Zimtya Zora Zul, Muaz Zulfahmi Zulfahmi Zulfikar Lubis Zulhelmi Zulhelmi Zulhelmi, Zulhelmi