p-Index From 2021 - 2026
21.175
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal USU LAW JOURNAL Jurnal Mahupiki INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM USU Journal of Legal Studies Abdimas Talenta : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat JURNAL MUQODDIMAH : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Unes Law Review Gorontalo Law Review Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Dialogia Iuridica Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Majalah Ilmiah Warta Dharmawangsa JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Res Nullius Law Journal JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Darma Agung ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum SOSEK: Jurnal Sosial dan Ekonomi Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Law_Jurnal Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences (FJAS) JURNAL JUSTIQA Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Tjut Nyak Dhien Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Journal of Comprehensive Science Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa Semarang Law Review Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi EduYustisia Jurnal Edukasi Hukum Dharmawangsa: International Journal of the Social Sciences, Education and Humanitis Mamangan Social Science Journal International Conference on Health Science, Green Economics, Educational Review and Technology (IHERT) JURNAL GOVERNANCE OPINION International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects) Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Recht Studiosum Law Review AL-SULTHANIYAH Lex Lectio Law Journal Mahadi : Indonesia Journal of Law Community: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) INSPIRING LAW JOURNAL Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia GRONDWET Journal of Constitutional Law and State Administrative Law Asian Multidisciplinary Research Journal of Economy and Learning Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues Binamulia Hukum Jurnal Hukum Statuta Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy International Journal of Law Analytic Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia ULJLS Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PADA PROGRAM KONPENSASI PENGURANGAN SUBSIDI BAHAN BAKAR MINYAK INFRASTRUKTUR PEDESAAN (STUDI PUTUSAN MA No. 2093 K / PID. SUS / 2011) Anggi P. Harahap; Mahmud Mulyadi; Madiasa Ablisar; Marlina Marlina
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 3, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (625.296 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Corruption can take place anywhere, in state institutions, in private institutions, and also in daily life. Combating corruption requires treatment and prevention in an integrated manner with the proper functioning of the legal system of the law and legal institutions in the criminal justice system. Based on the results of this research criminal liability against corruption is the liability of the offenses committed by the offender. Someone will be held accountable for these actions when there is an element in the action against the law and there is no excuse and fault elements must be met in terms of combating corruption. This is due to the principle of liability in criminal law that is not tobe punishment if no fault. Criminal act and criminal liability for acts of corruption in the PKPS BBM-IP activities in Simalungun where to defendant has been proven legally and convincingly, the defendant is able to be responsible and there is no excuse any fault that may negate or justification which can eliminate the unlawful nature of the act, the criminal liability for acts of corruption in the form of sentencing of offenders as set forth in the Supreme Court decision on the appeal. Keywords : corruption, criminal liability
PENGATURAN TENTANG PENYADAPAN (INTERSEPSI) DALAM PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA Adhy Iswara Sinaga; Madiasa Ablisar; Mahmud Mulyadi; Suhaidi Suhaidi
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 3, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (509.081 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT The arrangement of tapping in national legislation is arranged differently, some of them are arranged in details and some of them are not. Each of the arrangement is different depending on the needs on the institution and the needs of each institution. None of the act can be used as common guideline. The importance of tapping regulation should be made in a form of act because it connects with Human Rights and based on the constitution, Human Rights can only restricts through the act, not Government Regulation. The authority for taping which law enforcement normatively has cannot be contrary to Human Rights, after all the restriction of Human Rights is matched by the nature of Criminal Law itself which to limit every individual freedom that allowed by the law. The Government and Legislatives should make an act as a common guideline which regulates tapping. So the House of Representatives and the President can outsmart and dig deeper into the importance of tapping made into an act, not into a Government Regulation. Everybody should distinguish intelligently and carefully to indicate tapping as a violation of Human Rights. The mechanism of tapping should be regulated as clearly, firmly, and directed as possible. An exception can be necessary in order to avoid any violation of Human Rights. Keyword: Legislation, Tapping, and Human Rights.
PERBEDAAN ANTARA WANPRESTASI DAN DELIK PENIPUAN DALAM HUBUNGAN PERJANJIAN Sugirhot Marbun; Mahmud Mulyadi; Suhaidi Suhaidi; Mahmul Siregar
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 3, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (524.869 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Breach of contract is a true realm of civil law which should not be replaced by blaming someone else who did the breach of contract under criminal law but it must be based on the civil law.The offense of fraud should not be blamed on someone who did it for acts of breach of contract because it is the domain of criminal law. But in the court practice, a dilemma in law enforcement between which act is included in the category of breach of contract and which act is included in the category of offense of fraud in a contract frequently occur. The characteristic of breach of contract is seen from the negligence of somebody inimplementaing achievement in the good faith. While the element in the offense of fraud is exactly seen from the contrary namely from the element of intent not from the element of negligence. In the court of law, the practice of breach of contract and the offense of fraud. For the characteristics of breach of contract was released by the judge seen from the longstanding trade relationship in good faith. While the characteristics of the oiffense of fraud contained the element of intent in bad faith, benefiting themselves  or others,  not performing or avoiding obligations, containing the words of lie, and delaying for no obvious reason. Therefore, every individual, the parties or communities in making an agreement, especially police officers, prosecutors, advocates, and judges need to understand the characteristics of the difference between breach of contract and the offense of fraud. In the cases of agreement with the indication of breach of contract, the negligence of debtor in paying his debt must be proven first before the debtor can be accused for having breached a contract. Whilein the cases of agreement with the indication of the offense of fraud, the element of intent in bad faith must be proven first. Keywords: Agreement, Breach of Contract, Offense of Fraud
PENJATUHAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP ANAK PELAKU KEJAHATAN Pranggi Siagian; Alvi Syahrin; Mahmud Mulyadi; Marlina Marlina
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 3, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (575.524 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sanctions provided judges against juvenile offenders is in the form of sanctions measures and sanctions in prison, but within 30 (thirty) decision of the district court examined, the judges are more likely to sanction a prison, whereas criminal sanctions contrary to Child Protection Law. Of 30 (thirty) cases studied judge gives legal considerations through legal facts, facts trial, judgment based on a minimum of two (2) valid evidence, along with confidence, asking the opinion of the Board of Corrections and parents of children , and takes into account aggravating elements as a result of the defendant and the defendant relieve elements. The basic consideration in decisions to judges of juvenile offenders see in terms of the elements of the article have been met and other considerations is that such action can cause public unrest, as well as the obligations of judges in the decision to consider a report on the research community and the opinion of parents, as well as facts law and the facts in the trial are revealed, plus juridical considerations, this will give an overview to for the judge to make a decision that is fair.
PENERAPAN UNDANG-UNDANG TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM UPAYA MENGOPTIMALKAN PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN NEGARA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 1605 K/Pid.Sus/2014) Budi Bahreisy; Muhammad Hamdan; Mahmud Mulyadi; Jusmadi Sikumbang
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 3, No 3 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (596.175 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Corruption lately is getting more discussed, either in print, electronic or in seminars, workshops, discussions, and so on. The wealth gained from the crimes of corruption is usually can not directly be used because of the fear nor indicated as money laundering. For it is usually the perpetrators seek to hide the origin of such property by putting them into the banking system (financial system). The issues raised in this thesis is the relationship between corruption and money laundering and how the implementation of the law of money laundering in the eradication of corruption in the Supreme Court ruling No. 1605K / Pid.Sus / 2014. The method used in this thesis is a normative juridical research methods which is descriptive analysis using primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary that will be analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that the Corruption and money laundering has a very close relationship. It can be clearly viewed in Pasal 2 (1) of UU No. 8 of 2010. Application of the law of money laundering in the eradication of corruption in the Supreme Court's decision No: 1605 K / Pid.Sus / 2014 the District Court apply the UU No. 8 of 2010 to the corruption case, which is 5 years in prison, fines, recompense, and seizing the assets owned by the defendant from criminal act. At the level of the High Court, judges only fix the decision of Medan District Court that the verdict only increase the imprisonment of the accused for 6 (six) years in prison and on appeal judges only replace imprisonment to 6 (six) months if the fines is not paid by the defendant and replace imprisonment for two (2) years if the defendant can not pay the compensation. From the analysis of the case against the Supreme Court's decision No: 1605 K / Pid.Sus / 2014 in consideration from the judge, element can be harm state finance and economies which is based on results of calculations performed by BPKP North Sumatra province, it can be argued Judge Corruption Court in Medan not guided by UU No. 17 of 2003 regarding State Finance,UU No. 1 of 2004 concerning the state treasury, and the UU No. 15 of 2004 on Management and State Financial Responsibility very clearly gives the BPK in determining financial loss countries / regions.   Keyword : Money Laundering, Corruption, State Financial
TINDAK PIDANA PENELANTARAN RUMAH TANGGA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 23 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG PENGHAPUSAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 467K/Pid.Sus/2013) Fitriani Fitriani; Mahmud Mulyadi; Muhammad Ekaputra; Chairul Bariah
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 3, No 3 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (474.444 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Criminal cat on neglecting a family is the fourth violence in Law No. 23/2004. Law on PKDRT  does not provide systematic qualification about an action which is categorized as the act of neglecting. Today, imprisonment is considered the moist effective way to cope with the incidence of criminal act.The result of the research showed that criminal act of neglecting a family included not provide life for the family such as not supporting his children financially and not taking care of the family, especially when the family members were sick, not taking responsibility for the family members like economic neglect prohibiting them to get jobs, not fulfilling his obligation like taking something without the knowledge and the approval of the owner, and taking by force and/or manipulating the family members’ property. Imprisonment or fine is not appropriate imposed on the perpetrator who has neglected his family since it does not mean anything for the victim. He has to compensate the loss. One year imprisonment charged by judex juris judge is considered not appropriate; it seems that the judge did not consider the facts found in the hearing and Article 4, point d of Law of PKDRT Keywords: Criminal Act, Neglecting, Violence in Household
TINDAK PIDANA MENYURUH MEMASUKKAN KETERANGAN PALSU DALAM AKTE OTENTIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR : 1545/PID.B/2012 PN. MEDAN. JO PUTUSAN NOMOR :39/PID/2013/PT.MEDAN.) Themis Simaremare; Muhammad Hamdan; Mahmud Mulyadi; Jelly Leviza
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 3, No 3 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (743.231 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Article 266th -  first paragraph of the Criminal Code, about "people who were told to do". Case on 4th March, 2008 at Tulung Agung office, the  witness, Eveline Sago bought land  from Octo Berman Simanjuntak in Mandailing Natal, North Sumatra at  price USD. 6,000,000,000. The  High Court of  Medan  convict  the defendant to imprisonment for 1 (one) year and 6 (six) months confinement, specify the period of detention has been done by the defendant deducted entirely of imprisonment imposed, ordered defendant was arrested to jail break for eight months, and ordered the evidence to be returned to the Octo Berman Simanjuntak. This research also discuss about normative law ( normative juridical). And  the  characteristic is perspective analysis with “statute” and “analytical” approaches  to analysis  the  case. The results of this research contains : (a) The wearing of act (b) Fake letter and forged letters, (c) Using of subjective element (d) Actions (e) Objects (f) Authentic deed (g) the truth (h) cause harm ( Article 263rd and 266th ). Keywords: Crime, Entering False Information, Authentic Deed
ANALISIS HUKUM PENGGABUNGAN PERKARA KORUPSI DAN MONEY LAUNDERING DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN DI INDONESIA Chandra Purnama; Bismar Nasution; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Mahmud Mulyadi
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 4, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (586.21 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT   In Indonesia has been increasingly widespread practice of corruption and even to all aspects of life, both at central and local levels. Corruption is referred to as a crime against humanity because it has resulted in poverty and misery of the people. Corruption practices often followed by the Money Laundering Practice, money laundering practices today are very often carried out on the money earned from the evil of corruption. Corruption with Money Laundering has a relationship or association which is very fundamental. It can clearly be seen in article 2, paragraph 1 of Law - Law No. 8 of 2010 on the prevention and eradication of money laundering. In the Act itself known with a term called "predicate offenses" (predicate crime). The results showed that the effective way to make the process of proving the corruption as predicate money laundering Crime Crime is by incorporating (concursus) an indictment, because in addition to looking for financial losses caused by the state Anti-Corruption, Public Prosecutor should also be able to prove that assets - assets and property owned by the defendant obtained by using the proceeds of the Corruption, which is done in various ways which are elements of the Crime of money Laundering, it is intended to provide a more deterrent effect to the defendant. Keywords : Corruption, Money Laundering, Concursus
BUSINESS JUDGEMENT RULE DIKAITKAN DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH DIREKSI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN BISNIS YANG DIAMBIL Frans Affandhi; Bismar Nasution; Mahmul Siregar; Mahmud Mulyadi
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 4, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (570.002 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT When the SOE Board of Directors took the decision to run the company with the aim of seeking a profit, then the decision that will contain the business implications and legal implications. If it turns out, the decision was made a loss-making state enterprises fail or raised, then the SOE Board of Directors should not be prosecuted by the Anti-Corruption Act. This is because in the business world there are rules Business Judgment Rule (BJR) which regulates the sanctions to the Board of Directors. Such liability can not be sought from the Board of Directors of SOEs if: 1) The loss is not due to error or negligence; 2) It has been doing the maintenance of good faith and prudence for the benefit and in accordance with the purposes and objectives of the company; 3) There is a conflict of interest, either directly or indirectly, for the management of the resulting losses; and 4) have taken action to prevent and arising or continuing losses. Keywords : Business Judgment Rule; Directors of State Own Enterprise; Decision Maker
PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PENGGUNA NARKOTIKA SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DI POLRESTA MEDAN Victor Ziliwu; Syafruddin Kalo; Mahmud Mulyadi; Madiasa Ablisar
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 4, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (733.009 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Law on Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Act mandates an obligation to undergo treatment and the treatment and rehabilitation of drug addicts. The provisions concerning the "obligation" to undergo rehabilitation for users who experience addiction, in the Psychotropic Law stipulated in Article 36 s / d of Article 39 and the Narcotics Act under Article 45. Users of narcotics as criminals and at the same time as the victim, based on Article 103 Narcotics Act, the Supreme Court issued a breakthrough by issuing several circulars, among others: Circular of the Supreme Court (SEMA) No. 07 Year 2009 concerning the Placing to Drug Users In Nursing and Rehabilitation Therapy contained into Letter No. 07 / BUA.6 / HS / SP / III / 2009 dated March 17, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as SEMA No. 07 of 2009); and Circular of the Supreme Court (SEMA) No. 04 Year 2010 concerning the Stipulation of abuse, and to the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation In the Institute of Medical and Social Rehabilitation (hereinafter referred to as SEMA No. 04 of 2010). As a result of SEMA No. 07 in 2009 and continued with the SEMA No. 04 The year 2010 is associated with criminal law enforcement against drug users as criminals narcotics in Medan Police, the Investigator difficulty determining whether a person is caught red-handed with evidence under SEMA No. 07 The year 2009 belongs to the category of users or addicts. Because both are victims of crime as narcotic crime. The difficulty occurs because many actors are caught with evidence of drugs as defined in the SEMA No.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Alsa, Abdul Aziz Abdul Haris Abdul Munir Nasution Abul Khair Adhy Iswara Sinaga Adi Chandra Aditya Pranata Kaban Ady Ranto, Eko Afdhila, Sri Afrizal Chair Nawar Agus Kristianto Sinaga Agusmidah Agusmidah Agusta Kanin Agustami Lubis Agustining Agustining Agustining Ahmad Fadly Aldi Subartono Aldri Aldri, Aldri Alfi Syahrin Alfi Syahrin, Alfi Alimuddin Sinurat Almunawar Sembiring Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Amru Eryandi Siregar Anditya, Ariesta Wibisono Andri Dharma Andriati, Syarifa Lisa Andrio Bukit Angeline Siahaan, Yohanna Anggi P. Harahap Anis Putri Miranda Daulay Annette Anasthasia Napitupulu Antonius Bangun Silitonga Antonius Leonard Tarigan Arfin Fachreza Arief Rezana Dislan Ariesta Wibisono Anditya Ariq Ablisar Arivai Nazaruddin Sembiring Armia Pahmi Aryandi, Aryandi Astri Heiza Mellisa Aulia Annisa Azizah, Hanifah Bambang Rubianto Barus, Daniel Setiawan Batu, Elisa Yuliana Lumban Bella Azigna Purnama Bella Azigna Purnama Bismar Nasution Bismar Nasution Bismar Nasution Nasution Bismar Siregar, Bismar Bobbi Sandri Bornok Simanjuntak Brian Christian Telaumbanua Brunner, Emil Budi Bahreisy Budiawan, Sahala Valentino BUDIMAN GINTING Cardiana Harahap Cecep Priyayi Chainur Arrasyid Chairul Bariah Chandra Aulia Putra Chandra Purnama CHRISPO NATIO MUAL NATIO Cita Emia Tarigan, Vita Dahlia Kesuma Dewi Danang Dermawan Daniel Clinton Daniel Siregar Dea Vony Nifili Zega Dedi Harianto Delfiandi, Delfiandi Denny Reynold Octavianus Des Boy Rahmat Eli Zega DewiMaya Benadicta Barus Dikki Saputra Saragih Dimas B. Samuel Simanjuntak Donny Alexander Donris Sihaloho Dwina Elfika Putri Dwina ELFIKA PUTRI Elfika Putri Edi Ikhsan Edi Suranta Sinulingga Edi Warman Edi Yunara Edison Sumitro Situmorang Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman Ediwarman, Ediwarman Eduward Eduward Edy Ihkhsan Edy Ikhsan Edy Suranta Tarigan Edy Yunara Edy Yunara Efraim Sihombing EKA ASTUTI Eka Supandi Lingga Eka Wijaya Silalahi Ekaputra, M. Ekaputra, Mohammad Eko Ady Ranto Eko Hartanto Elizabeth Purba ELLY SYAFITRI HARAHAP Elwi Danil Erick Jeremi Manihuruk Erman Syafrudianto Erwin Pangihutan Situmeang Ester Lauren Putri Harianja Fadilah Khoirinnisa Harahap Fahri Rahmadhani Fahrizal S.Siagian Faisal Akbar Nasution Faisal Rahmat Husein Simatupang Faiz Ahmed Illovi Fajar Rudi Manurung Farah Diba Batubara Ferdi Ferdy Saputra Ferimon Ferimon Ferimon, Ferimon Fernandes Edi Syahputra Silaban Fernando, Zico Junius Fickry Abrar Pratama Fitriani Fitriani Frans Affandhi Freddy VZ. Pasaribu FREDRIGK ROGATE Frendra AH AH Frima A Sitanggang Gilbeth Abiet Nego Sitindaon Giovani Giovani Gomgoman Simbolon Gultom, Steffy Suzani Meilina Gunawan Sinurat Gusmarani, Rica H. I. H, ferdinan Hady, Faisal Hafizhul Khair AM Hamdan, M Hanan Hanawi Aananda Putra Sitohang Hanifah Azizah Hardy Primadi Hartono Hartono HASIM PURBA Hasim Purba Hasyim Purba Hendra Eko Triyulianto Heni Widiyani Henny Handayani Henry Sinaga Herbert Rumanang Herianto Herianto Herlina Sitorus Hia, Hipotesa Ibnu Afan Ibnu Affan Ibnu Affan Ibrahim Ali IBRAHIM, NURIJAH Iman Azahari Ginting Iman Rahmat Gulo Imanuel Sembiring Imanuel Sembiring Immanuel Colia Immanuel P Simamora Immanuel Simanjuntak INDRA PERMANA RAJA GUKGUK Iqbal Ramadhan Satria Prawira IRENE CRISTNA SILALAHI Irfan Santoso Irham Parlin Lubis Irwan Charles Sitompul Irzan Hafiandy Ismail Ginting Ismanto, Ade Jaya Ismawansa Ismawansa Isnaini Isnaini Ivan Giovani sembiring Jamaluddin Mahasari Jefrianto Sembiring Jelly Leviza Jelly Leviza Jenda Riahta Silaban Jenggel Nainggolan Jeremia Sipahutar Jhon Leonardo Hutagalung Jhordy M.H. Nainggolan Jimmy Donovan Johannes Hutapea Joko Pranata Situmeang Jonathan Hasudungan Hasibuan Josia Suarta Sembiring Judika Atma Togi Manik Julanta Sinuraya, Fransiskus Xaverius Juliani Prihartini Julisman Julisman Junhaidel Samosir Juni Kristian Telaumbanua Jusmadi Sikumbang Kartina Pakpahan Kayaruddin Hasibuan Keke Wismana Purba Khairul Imam Kondios Meidarlin Pasaribu Kristin Manurung Kumaedi Kuo Bratakusuma Leonard Pandapotan Sinaga Lisa Andriansyah Rizal Lisa Andrianti, Syarifah Liza erwina Lubis, Ivan Ghani Lubis, Yeti Meliany M Budi Hendrawan M Ekaputra M Ekaputra M Ekaputra M Hamdani M. Ainul Yaqin M. Eka Putra M. Ekaputra M. Ekaputra M. Hamdan M. Hamdan M. Hamdan M. Hamdan M. Harris Sofian Hasibuan M. Iqbal Asnawi M. Nur Hidayat Manurung M.Eka Putra M.Ekaputra M.Ekaputra M.Jalil Sembiring Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablizar Madiasa Ablizar Madiasa Albisar Madiasa Albisar, Madiasa Maharany Barus, Utary MAHMUL SIREGAR Mahmul Siregar Malto S. Datuan Mangasitua Simanjuntak Manihuruk, Erick Jeremi Manik, Bisker Manurung, Eva Valentina Maria Marihot Tua Silitonga Mario Tondi Natio Marissa Hutabarat Marlina Marlina Marlina Marlina Marlina Marlina Marlina, Marlina Marthin Fransisco Manihuruk Martina Indah Amalia Marudut Hutajulu Maryani Melindawati Marzuki Marzuki Marzuki Marzuki Maslon Ambarita Mhd Hamdan Mirza Erwinsyah Mirza Nasution Mirza Nasution Mirza Nasution Mohd Din Muhammad Daud Siregar Muhammad Ekaputra Muhammad Hamdan Muhammad Hamdan Muhammad Husairi Muhammad Hykna Kurniawan Lubis Muhammad Junaidi Muhammad Nuh Muhammad Ridwanta Tarigan Muhammad Yusuf Siregar Muhammd Hamdan Mukidi, Mukidi Mulya Hakim Solichin Mustamam, Mustamam Naharuddin Naharuddin Naibaho, Kinski Vania Nainggolan, Daniel Nainggolan, Rani Oslina Napitupulu, Bani Praseto Nara Palentina Naibaho Nasrun Pasaribu Nasution, Aulia Arif Natali Masita NINGRUM NATASYA SIRAIT Nixson Nixson Novi Rahmawati Novia Masda Barus Nur Fadillah Rizky Nasution Nur Istiono Nurijah Ibrahim Nurmala wati Nurmala Waty Nurpanca Sitorus Nurul Amelia Nurul Efridha Ocktresia. M. Sihite OK Saidin Oki Yudhatama Panca Hutagalung Panca Sarjana Putra Pane, Lorita Tupaida Panji Nugraha Pantun Marojahan Simbolon Pardede, Rendra Yoki Parlindungan Silalahi, Juliandi Parlindungan Twenti Saragih Pasaribu, Rizaldy Pasaribu, Theo Yose Pratama Pendastaren Tarigan Perdana Sani, Tantra Phio Tuah Reysario Sinaga Pranggi Siagian Putra, Panca Sarjana Putri Mauliza Fonna R. Sapto Hendri Boedi Soesatyo Rabithah Nazran Rachmatullah Rachmatullah Rafidah Sinulingga Rafiqoh lubis Rahmadhani, Sylvia Ramadhan, Rinaldi Ramadhan, Ryan Fadly Ramlan Damanik Ramli Tambunan Rangkuti, Liza Hafidzah Yusuf Ranu Wijaya Rasina Padeni Nasution Regi Putra Manda Restu Y.S Zendrato Riamor Bangun Ricky Adryan Siahaan Rina Melati Sitompul Rinaldi Ramadhan Rio Nababan Ritonga, Fani Holidayani Ritonga, Muhammad Sacral Rizki Dwi Putra Siregar Rizky, Fajar Khaify Robby Irsan Robert Robert Robert Valentino Tarigan Robert, Robert Robles Arnold L Rocky Marbun, Rocky Ronald F. C. Sipayung Roni Pardamean Gultom Ronny Nicolas Sidabutar Roro Vanesia Pandiangan Rosmalinda Rosmalinda, Rosmalinda Rosnidar Sembiring Rosy, Deuis Rina Rozhi Ananda Sitepu Rumahorbo, Alberth Mangasi Runtung Runtung Rusdi Marzuki Rusdi Rusdi Ruth Gladys Sembiring Safnul, Dody Saidin Samandhohar Munthe Samuel Marpaung SAMUEL PEBRIANTO MARPAUNG PEBRIANTO Sandy, Mahmud Isyac Kurnia SANGGAM BILL CLINTON SIMANJUNTAK Sari Mariska Siregar Saur Sihaloho Sebayang, Dona Martinus Sebayang, Ekinia Karolin Secsio Jimec Nainggolan Sembiring, Debreri Irfansyah Shahreiza, D. Sianturi, Senior Sihombing, Dedy Chandra Sihombing, Eka NAM Silvana Silalahi, Ririn SIMAMORA, DANIEL Simanjuntak, Delima Mariaigo Simaremare, Yoseanna Anastasya Sinaga, Dwi Natal Ngai Santoso Sinaga, Esron Sinaga, Oloan Ikhwan Maruli Tua Sinulingga, Tommy Aditia Sipayung, Ronald Fredy Christian Sirait, Rara Pitaloka Siregar, Taufik Sitepu, Yosua Prima Arihta Sitorus, Raja Pranata Situmorang, Rima Melati Sonya Airini Batubara Soritua Agung Tampubolon Spesio Panjaitan, Kevin Theodosus Sri Delyanti Sudarma Setiawan Sugeng Riyadi Sugirhot Marbun Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Sukarja, Detania Sunarmi Sunarmi Sunarmi Sunarmi, Sunarmi Supian Natalis SUPRAYITNO Surbakti, Benny Avalona Surya Ari Wibowo Surya Sofyan Hadi Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Syafrddin Kalo Syafruddin Kalo Syafruddin S. Hasibuan Syafruddin Sulung Hasibuan Syafrudin Kalo Syahron Hasibuan Syamsul Arifin Syarifah Lisa Syarifah Lisa Andriati Syarifah Lisa Andriati Syarifah Tigris Syarifuddin Kalo Tambunan, Stephy Anggi Eliza Tampubolon, Christya Graceilla Putri Tan Kamello Tan Kamello Tanjung, Wiranti TANTRA KHAIRUL Tantra Perdana Tarigan, Vita Cita Emia Tarigan, Yos Arnold Taryono Raharja Taufik Taufik Teddy Lazuardi Syahputra Telaumbanua, Brian Christian Tengku Keizerina Devi A Thahir, Irfan Farid Themis Simaremare Timbul TM Aritonang Tito Travolta Hutauruk Tody Valery Tony Tony Topo Santoso Triono Eddy Trisna, Wessy Tumanggor, Paian Tumpal Utrecht Napitupulu Tunggul Yohannes Ucox Pratua Nugraha Utari Maharany Barus Utary Maharany Barus Victor Ziliwu Vita Cita Emia Tarigan Wendell, Raynaldo Divian Wenggedes Frensh Weni Julianti S Wessy Trisna Wessy Trisna Wessy Trisna Wilson Bugner Pasaribu Wira Prayatna Wisjnu Wardhana Yakub Frans Sihombing Yana Armaretha Pinayungan Yetti Q.H. Simamora Yolanda Sari KS Yona Lamerossa Ketaren Yoyok Adi Syahputra Yudhistira Frandana Yuliani, Lisa Yulida, Devi Yunus Husein Zikrul Hakim Zimtya Zora Zul, Muaz Zulfahmi Zulfahmi Zulfikar Lubis Zulhelmi, Zulhelmi