Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
18.65
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Applied Power Engineering (IJAPE) International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS) International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan EKUIVALEN - Pendidikan Matematika TEKNIK Jurnal Presipitasi : Media Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan GEMA TEKNOLOGI Media Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan indonesia JURNAL PROMOSI KESEHATAN INDONESIA Prosiding Seminar Biologi Publikasi Pendidikan Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Journal of Tropical Soils Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Dinamika Pendidikan Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan Waste Technology Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat Jurnal Produksi Tanaman FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum MONOGRAF Eksergi: Chemical Engineering Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum LINK AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika World Chemical Engineering Journal Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Alchemy Jurnal Penelitian Kimia JURNAL KESEHATAN LINGKUNGAN (Journal of Environmental Health) JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) JHP17 (Jurnal Hasil Penelitian) Diponegoro Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika HIGEIA (Journal of Public Health Research and Development) Educational Management Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies Edu Geography Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pajak JURNAL KESEHATAN LINGKUNGAN: Jurnal dan Aplikasi Teknik Kesehatan Lingkungan Kesmas Indonesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Masyarakat AKSIOLOGIYA : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia AcTion: Aceh Nutrition Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Diksa : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung (Journal of Agricultural Engineering) Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PROGRAM PASCASARJANA Media Kesehatan Politeknik Kesehatan Makassar JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat Adimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jambura Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Unnes Journal of Public Health Journal of Primary Education Kosmik Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Publik dan Kebijakan Sosial Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP) Poltekita : Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Dinasti International Journal of Management Science International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR) Management Studies and Entrepreneurship Journal (MSEJ) Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian ASEAN Journal of Chemical Engineering Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA Surya Teknika: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Mesin Jurnal Pajak dan Keuangan Negara (PKN) Budimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesian Journal of Global Health research Jurnal JURISTIC (JuJUR) Jurnal Idea Hukum IGKOJEI: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Narra J Ekonomi dan Bisnis Journal of Instructional and Development Researches Pancasila and Law Review Ius Poenale Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat Indonesia (JPPMI) Jurnal Agroteknologi Pertanian dan Publikasi Riset Ilmiah (JAPPRI) Biram Samtani Sains Jurnal Riset Kesehatan Masyarakat Journal of Vocational Studies on Applied Research Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran VIVA THEMIS- Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Surya Teknika: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Mesin Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood : Jurnal Dunia Anak Usia Dini Journal of Education Method and Learning Strategy Jurnal Kala Nea Soedirman Law Review Proceeding of International Conference on Humanity Education and Society Jurnal Cerdas Mendidik Jurnal Sosialita: Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Pendidikan Malahayati International Journal of Nursing and Health Science Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies Proceeding Mulawarman International Conference on Tropical Public Health
Budiyono Budiyono
SMA Negeri 1 Semarang, Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 362 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 37 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

 1   2   3   4 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DAN PROBLEM POSING PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWAKELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Rini, Juwita; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the reasoning ability of the students. The learning models compared were the problem based learning model, the problem posing learning model, and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Banyumas regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were the students of State Junior Secondary School 4 of Purwokerto, State Junior Secondary School 2 of Sokaraja, and State Junior Secondary School 2 of Baturraden. They were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in Mathematics and test of reasoning abilities. The data were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research are as follows. 1) The problem-based learning model results in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the problem posing learning model but results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model, and the problem posing learning model results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model. 2) The students with the high reasoning ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate and low reasoning abilities, and the students with the moderate reasoning ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low reasoning ability.      3) In the students with the high reasoning ability, the problem-based learning results in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the problem posing model but results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model, and the problem posing model results in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the direct learning model. In the students with the moderate and low reasoning abilities, the problem-based learning, the problem posing learning model, and the direct learning model result in the same learning achievement in Mathematics. 4) In the problem-based learning, the students with the high reasoning ability have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate an low reasoning abilities, and the students with the moderate reasoning ability have the same learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the low reasoning ability. In the problem posing learning model, the students with the high reasoning ability have the same learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate reasoning ability, but the students both with the high and moderate reasoning abilities have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low reasoning ability. In the direct learning model, the students with the high, moderate, and low reasoning abilities have the same learning achievement in Mathematics.Key words: Problem Based Learning, Problem Posing, and Reasoning ability.
PERBANDINGAN PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL ANTARA MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DAN NHT PADA POKOK BAHASAN SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINIER DUA VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI KEPERCAYAAN DIRI SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN MAD Susanti, Vera Dewi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of research are to find out, in mathematics learning for two-variable linear equation system subject matter: (1) which one providing better achievement, the CTL learning model with STAD, that with NHT or the direct learning model, (2) which one providing better achievement, high, medium or low self-confidence, and (3) in high, medium or low self-confidence, which one providing better achievement, CTL approach with STAD or NHT type or direct learning model.The population of research was the students of Junior High Schools throughout Madiun Regency in the first semester of VIII grade in the school year of 2011/2012. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling with the students of SMP Negeri 2 Dolopo, SMP Negeri 2 Kebonsari and SMP Negeri 2 Geger as the sample. The instruments used to collect the data included test to obtain the data of mathematic learning achievement and questionnaire for the on of student’s self-confidence. Technique of analyzing data used was 3x3 two-way variance analysis. From the result of analysis, it could be concluded that: (1) The mathematics learning achievement of students using STAD type of cooperative learning model with CTL approach was better than that using NHT type, that using STAD type with CTL approach was better than that using direct learning model, and that using NHT type with CTL approach was better than that using direct learning model. (2) The mathematics learning achievement with high self-confidence was better than that with medium one; that with high self-confidence was better than that with low one; and that with medium self-confidence was better than that with low one. (3) Viewed from self-confidence level, the mathematics learning achievement of the students using STAD type of cooperative learning with CTL approach was better than that using NHT type, that using STAD type of cooperative learning with CTL approach was better than that using direct learning model, and that using NHT type of cooperative learning with CTL approach was better than that using direct learning model.Keywords: Learning model, CTL approach STAD, NHT, , direct learning, self confidence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT DENGAN STRATEGI PETA KONSEP PADA MATERI SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL PESERTA DIDIK Yuwono, Muhammad Ridlo; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

 Abstract: The objective of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement of quadrangle viewed from the spatial ability of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TGT type with concept mapping strategy, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type, and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental method. Its population was all of the students in grade VII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Pati regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples of the research consisted of 325 students. They were grouped into three groups, namely: 109 in experimental group 1, 110 in experimental group 2, and 106 in control group. The instruments to gather the data were test of achievement on the learning topic of quadrangle, and test of spatial ability. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of the TGT type with concept mapping strategy results in a better learning achievement than the cooperative learning model of the TGT type and the direct learning model, but the cooperative learning model of the TGT type results in the same learning achievement as the direct learning model. (2) The students with the high spatial ability had the same learning achievement as those with the moderate spatial ability, but the students with the high spatial ability and those with the moderate spatial ability had a better learning achievement than those with the low spatial ability. (3) In each category of the spatial abilities, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type with concept mapping strategy results in a better learning achievement than the cooperative learning model of the TGT type and the direct learning model, but the cooperative learning model of the TGT type results in the same learning achievement as the direct learning model. (4) In each of the learning models, the students with the high spatial ability had the same learning achievement as those with the moderate spatial ability, but the students with the high spatial ability and those with the moderate spatial ability had a better learning achievement than those with the low spatial ability.Keywords: TGT, concept mapping, and spatial ability.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR PADA PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA PESERTA DIDIK SMA SE – KAB. MAGELANG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013 Pratiwi, Katherine Her; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The objectives of this research are to investigate: 1) which of the cooperative learning model of the Jigsaw type, the cooperative learning model of the Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and the direct learning  results in a better learning achievement in mathematics, 2) which of  the students with the high self-regulated learning, the students with the medium self-regulated learning, and the students with the low self-regulated learning have a better learning achievement in mathematics, 3) in each of the learning models which of the students with the high self-regulated learning, the students with the medium self-regulated learning, and the students with the low self-regulated learning have a better learning achievement in mathematics, 4) in each of the self-regulated learning, which on the cooperative learning model of the Jigsaw type, the cooperative learning model of the NHT type, and the direct learning model results in a better learning achievement in mathematics. The research used the experimental quasi research method with the factorial design of 3x3. The population of the research was all of the students in Grade XI of Senior High School  in Magelang regency in academic year 2012/2013. The samples of research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The samples of the research were the students of Taruna Nusantara senior high school, state senior high school 1 of Bandongan, and state senior high school 1 of Dukun. The hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells at the significance level of a = 0,05. The results of the research are as follows: 1) Jigsaw better than NHT and direct learning, whereas NHT equal to direct learning in mathematics achievement, 2) the high self-regulated learning better than medium  and low, whereas the medium better than low in mathematics achievement, 3) Jigsaw with the high self-regulated learning better than the medium and low, whereas the medium better than the low in mathematics achievement. NHT with the high self-regulated learning better than the medium and low, whereas the medium equal to the low in mathematics achievement. Direct learning with the high self-regulated learning better than the medium and low, whereas the medium equal to the low in mathematics achievement. 4) The high self-regulated learning with the cooperative learning model of NHT type better than Jigsaw and direct learning, whereas Jigsaw better than direct learning. The medium self-regulated learning with the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type better than NHT and direct learning, whereas NHT equal to direct learning. The Low self-regulated learning with NHT better than Jigsaw and direct learning in mathematics achievement. Keywords : Jigsaw, NHT, and self-regulated learning.
PENGEMBANGAN MULTIMEDIA INTERAKTIF UNTUK PEMBELAJARAN MATERI POKOK BALOK SISWA SMP KELAS VIII Hardiyanto, Edwin Latif; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this study were: (1) to develop a valid interactive multimedia learning as a source of student learning in understanding the topic of Cuboid of eight grade students; and (2) to know the effectiveness of learning interactive multimedia products which had been developed. This research was a development study using Borg & Gall model where the steps as follows: (1) preliminary study that consisted of literature study and field study; (2) development that consisted of purpose analysis, capability analysis, development design; (3) field test that consisted of limited field test, wider field test and operational test; (4) effectiveness test; (5) dissemination. The research population was all eight grade students of SMPN 2 Ponorogo.The sample was taken using cluster random sampling. Data were collected in the form of even UTS value 2013/2014 in mathematics subject used documentation method the validity of product used questionnaire method, the learning results in mathematics used test method. The validity of the developed interactive multimedia product used content validity by material expert and media expert.The validity of test item was determined by: (1) content validity; (2) discrimination power; (3) difficulty level; (4) reliability. The normality test used Lilliefors method and homogeneity of variance test used Bartlett method. The balanced and the hypothesis test used t-test statistic. The results of this study were as follows: (1) a valid interactive multimedia learning as a source of student learning in understanding mathematics of eight grade students of SMP especially Cuboid; (2) the result of effectiveness test showed that the mathematics learning results of students who used interactive multimedia were better than students who did not use interactive multimedia learning.Keywords:  Development, Interactive Multimedia, Interactive Multimedia Learning
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AfL) MELALUI STRATEGI PEMBERIAN BALIKAN DAN AfL MELALUI TEKNIK BERTANYA YANG EFEKTIF DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTRAPERSONAL PADA SISWA SMP/MTs KELAS VII SE-KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/201 R, Tika Karlina; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

achievement, students are given Assessment for Learning (AfL) through providing feedback, Assessment for Learning (AfL) through asking effective questions or direct learning model, (2) which has better learning achievement, students with intrapersonal intelligence of high, moderate or low, (3) which has better learning achievement, students are given Assessment for Learning (AfL) through providing feedback, Assessment for Learning (AfL) through asking effective questions or direct learning model in each intrapersonal intelligence, (4) which has better learning achievement, students with intrapersonal intelligence of high, moderate or low on each learning model. The research was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial designs. The populations were the students of SMP/MTs in Surakarta on academic year 2013/2014 which consisted of 79 SMP/MTs. The size of the sample was 224 students. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and a questionnaire of student’s intrapersonal intelligence. The data was analyzed using two ways ANOVA. According to the research results, it can be concluded: (1) AfL model through providing feedback had better mathematics achievement than AfL through asking effective questions and direct learning model, whole AfL through asking effective questions had better mathematics achievement than direct learning model, (2) the high intrapersonal intelligence students had better mathematics achievement than the moderate and low intrapersonal intelligence students, while the moderate intrapersonal intelligence students had better mathematics achievement than the low intrapersonal intelligence students, (3) for high and moderate intrapersonal intelligence, the students’ mathematics achievement treated by AfL through providing feedback better than students treated by direct learning model; for low intrapersonal intelligence, all the three models had the same mathematics achievement, (4) for AfL model through providing feedback, the students’ mathematics achievement which have high intrapersonal intelligence better than low intrapersonal intelligence; for AfL model through asking effective questions, the students’ mathematics achievement which have high intrapersonal intelligence better than moderate intrapersonal intelligence, the students’ mathematics achievement which have moderate intrapersonal intelligence better than low intrapersonal intelligence; for direct learning model, students with intrapersonal intelligence of high, moderate and low had the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Assessment for Learning (AfL), providing feedback, asking effective questions, intrapersonal intelligence, learning achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DAN TIPE ROUNDTABLE DISERTAI DENGAN ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AFL) MELALUI PEER-ASSESSMENT PADA PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA Hr, Bq Malikah; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of the research were to determine: (1) which learning models that produces better mathematics achievement, TSTS-AfL (TSTS type accompanied by AfL through peer-assessment), R-AfL (roundtable type accompanied by AfL through peer-assessment), or CL (classical learning); (2) which students that have better mathematics achievement, students with climbers type, campers, or quitters; (3) in each type of AQ, which of the tree learning models that produces better mathematics achievement; (4) in each learning model, which of the tree types students that have better mathematics achievement. The research was a quasi-experimental research, with a factorial design 3x3. The population was all students of State Senior High School in East Lombok of 2014/2015. The sample obtained was 347 students. Instruments in the research were mathematics learning achievement test and AQ questionnaire. The data was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. The results of the research indicated as follows: (1) TSTS-AfL produces better mathematics achievement than R-AfL and CL, R-AfL produces better mathematics achievement than CL; (2) Students with climbers type have better mathematics achievement than campers and quitters, students with campers type have better mathematics achievement than quitters; (3) For the students with climbers and quitters type, the use of TSTS-AfL produces mathematics achievement as well as R-AfL and better than CL, R-AfL produces mathematics achievement as well as CL. For the students with campers type, the use of    TSTS-AfL produces mathematics achievement as well as R-AfL and better than CL, R-AfL produces better mathematics achievement than CL; (4) Of                  TSTS-AfL, students with climbers type have mathematics achievement as well as with campers and better than quitters, campers type have achievement as well as quitters. Of R-AfL, students with climbers type have mathematics achievement as well as campers and better than quitters, and campers type have better mathematics achievement then quitters. Of CL, all of the type had the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Cooperative learning model of TSTS type, Roundtable type,                 Peer-assessment, Adversity quotient and Mathematics achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS), GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI), DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA Putra P, Heldy Ramadhan; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of research were to find out: (1) which one have better learning achievement, the students receiving TPS, those receiving GI or those receiving PBL learning models, (2) which one have better learning achievement, the students with high, those with medium or those with low spatial ability, (3) in each learning model, which one have better learning achievement, the students with high, those with medium or those with low spatial ability, and (4) in each spatial ability, which one have better learning achievement, the students receiving TPS, those receiving GI or those receiving PBL learning models. This study was a quasi-experimental research with a 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of research was all of the 8th graders of Public Junior High School throughout Surakarta City. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used for collecting data were mathematics learning achievement and spatial ability tests. Before used for data collection, the instruments of achievement and spatial ability tests were tried out first. Technique of analyzing data used was a two-way analysis of variance test with unbalanced  cells. Considering the result of hypothesis testing, the following conclusions could be drawn. (1) PBL type of cooperative learning have better learning achievement than the GI and TPS types did, GI type have learning achievement as good as the TPS type did. (2) The students with high spatial ability have better learning achievement than those with medium and those with low spatial ability, while those with medium spatial ability have better learning achievement than those with low spatial ability. (3) In various learning models, the students with high spatial ability have better learning achievement than those with medium and those with low spatial ability, while those with medium spatial ability have better learning achievement than those with low spatial ability. (4) In each category of spatial ability, the students receiving PBL type of cooperative learning have better learning achievement than those receiving GI and TPS types did, those receiving GI type have learning achievement as good as those receiving TPS type did.Keywords: TPS, GI, PBL, Learning Achievement, Spatial Ability
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) PADA MATERI ARITMATIKA SOSIAL DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VII SEKABUPATEN PACITAN Anggraheni, Retno; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of research were to find out: (1) which learning model provided better student learning achievement, Problem based Learning (PBL) or Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type of Cooperative Learning or direct learning model, (2) which students had better mathematics learning achievement, those with auditory, or visual, or kinesthetic learning style,  (3) in each learning model, which one had mathematics learning achievement better, whether the students with auditory, those with visual or those with kinesthetic learning style, (4)  in each learning style, which one provided better mathematics learning achievement, Problem based Learning (PBL) or Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type of Cooperative Learning or direct learning model. This study was a quasi experimental research with a 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of research was all of the VII graders of Junior High Schools in Pacitan Regency. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The sample of research consisted of 242 students: 82 students for the experiment 1, 80 students for experiment 2 and 80 students for control classes. Considering the result of hypothesis testing, the following conclusions could be drawn. (1) The Problem Based Learning, the NHT type of cooperative learning, and direct learning models provided equal mathematics learning achievement. (2) The students with visual learning style had the mathematics learning achievement equal to those with kinesthetic one. Those with visual learning style had the mathematics learning achievement better than those with auditory one. Those with kinesthetic learning style had the mathematics learning achievement better than those with auditory one. (3) In PBL learning model, the students with visual learning style had the mathematics learning achievement better than those with auditory one, but those with visual learning style had the mathematics learning achievement equal to those with kinesthetic one, and those with auditory learning style had the mathematics learning achievement equal to those with kinesthetic one. In NHT type of cooperative learning model, the students with visual learning style had the mathematics learning achievement equal to those with auditory one and those with visual learning style had the mathematics learning achievement equal to those with kinesthetic one, but those with auditory learning style had the mathematics learning achievement better than those with kinesthetic one. In direct learning model, the results of the three learning style provided equal learning achievement. (4) In the students with visual learning style, PBL model provided learning achievement equal to the NHT type of cooperative learning one, PBL did better than the direct one, and the NHT type did better than the direct one. In auditory learning style, PBL model provided the learning achievement equal to the NHT type, while PBL did better than the direct one, and the NHT type did better than the direct one. In those with kinesthetic learning style, PBL model provided learning achievement equal to the NHT type of cooperative learning one, PBL did better than the direct one, and the NHT type did better than the direct one. In auditory learning style, PBL model provided the learning achievement equal to the NHT type, PBL provided learning achievement equal to the direct one, and the NHT type did better than the direct one. Keywords: Problem Based Learning (PBL), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), student learning style. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING, GROUP INVESTIGATION DAN THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWA Ardani, Anwar; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to find out the different effect of learning models using scientific approach on the students’ learning achievement viewed from the students’ reasoning ability. This study was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The population of research was all of the 8th graders of Junior High Schools throughout Tegal regency in the school year of 2014/2015. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The data analysis was conducted using a two-way anava with unbalanced cells at significance level of 5%. The results of research showed: (1) the learning achievement of students treated with PBL PS was equally good to that of those treated with GI PS, that of those treated with PBL PS and GI PS was better than that of those with TPS PS, (2) the learning achievement of students with high reasoning ability was equally good to that of those with medium one, the learning achievements of students with high and medium reasoning ability were better than that of those with low one, (3) in each reasoning ability, the learning achievement of students treated with PBL PS was equally good to that of those treated with GI PS, that of those treated with PBL PS and GI PS was better than that of those with TPS PS, and (4) in each learning model, the learning achievement of students with high reasoning ability was equally good to that of those with medium one, the learning achievements of students with high and medium reasoning ability were better than that of those with low one.Keywords: Scientific PBL (PBL PS), scientific GI (GI PS), scientific TPS (TPS PS) and reasoning ability.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Abi Fadila Achmad Nurrofiq Adinata, Yuda candri Aditya Kusumawati, Aditya Aditya, Vanessa Rizky Afidah, Sururin Afriyanto Afriyanto Agung Kurniawan Agus Hadiyarto Agus Margono AGUS PURWANTO Agus Yuwono Agustin, Tina Agustina, Risa Ahmad Faqihi, Ahmad Ahmad Saleh Ainun Ikbal, Alif Airlangga Airlangga, Airlangga Alfan Afandi Alfarizi, Safrudi Ali Djamhuri Ali, Syuhaeda Aeni Mat Aliyana, Aliyana Alvitriani Alvitriani, Alvitriani Amalia Zulvia Widyaningrum Ana Fauziah Anak Agung Istri Sri Wiadnyani Anastasya, Diana Ayu Andi Irwan Benardi, Andi Irwan Andini, Swastika Andri Cahyo Kumoro Andriyani, Liz Y. Anggi T W, Y Gigih Anggi TW, Y Gigih Anggun Srirahayu, Anggun Angkasa Angkasa Ani Margawati Ani Nurwijayanti, Ani Anisa Nurjanah, Anisa Anna Setyowati Antarini Antarini, Antarini Antono Suryoputro Anwar Ardani Anwar, M. Khoerul Apoina Kartini Aprilia Aprilia, Aprilia Apsari, Laeila Ardi Dwi Susandi Ardiyanto, David Arief Kristyawan Arif Rahman Arkhan Subari Armunanto, Armunanto Arrohmah, Munib Asfiya, Nissa Atul Astorina Yunita Dewanti, Nikie Astorina, Nikie Aulia Musla Mustika Aurell, Yuendzi Santa Ayun Sriatmi Ayuningtyas, Nimas Putri AYUNINGTYAS, RENY Bagoes Widjanarko Baharsyah, Moh. Nasrul Baharsyah, Moh. Nasrul Barkhuizen, Jaco Bayu Wicaksono Beni Saputra Bibit Nasrokhatun Diniah Binti Anisaul Khasanah Bq Malikah Hr, Bq Malikah Buchori Asyik Budi Santosa Budi Santosa Budi Usodo Budi Warsito Bustomi Bustomi Cahya Tri Purnami Chadikun, Paulus Chairani, Nadia Christiyani, Bintang Rumiris D. Wasgito Purnomo Dalud Daeka Darmadi Darmadi Darmanto Darmawati, Ratna Puspa Dedy Miswar Desi Tri Utami, Desi Tri Dessy Paiman Desy Arshinta, Desy Devi Yuliyanti Dewanti, Nikie Astorina Dewi Muliasari Dewi Nurhalimah, Dewi Dewi Retno Sari Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Dewi, Hapsari Dewi, Rahmatika Dian Dwi Astutik, Dian Dwi Dian Fitri Argarini, Dian Fitri Diana Diana Diari Indriati Dismas Suparmo Djemari Mardapi Dwi Hapsari Retnaningrum Dwi Kurniawan, Ari Dwi Rohman Soleh, Dwi Rohman Dzakiyah, Anis Edi Subkhan, Edi Edwin Latif Hardiyanto Edy Haryono Efendi, Tino Feri Eko Nugroho Eko Widaryanto Elida Novita Ellesse, Karinna Elvia, Rosi Elywati Elywati Erna Dewi . Ernawati, Fifth Ervianni, Novi Yuli Esti Setiawati Eva Tri Wahyuni Evi Yulia Arini, Evi Yulia Fadhilah, Fatin FADHOLI, MUHAMMAD Fajarwati, Eka Farid Afrian, Muhammad Fathurrahman, Hanif Muhammad Fauzi, Ihwan Feri Candra Setiawan, Feri Candra Feriandi, Yoga Ardian Feriansah, Arif Firdausi, Eyda Firmansyah Firmansyah Firmansyah, Ade Arif Firmansyah, Aditya Fitriana Anggar Kusuma Fitriana, Laila Fitriani, Nanda Fofana, Fadillah Fathir Mahmud Friska, Erlin FX Sumarja, FX Gatut Iswahyudi Giant Aprisetyani Gultom, Rachel Sophia Joy Aprilia Hadi, Siswan Handayani, Mella Handayani, Novia Haq, Zahron Hardiansyah, Mas Achmad Hartuti Purnaweni Haryono Haryono Hasirun, La Ode Hastuti, Endah Kurnia Hefnita, Hefnita Heldy Ramadhan Putra P Hendriana, Rani Hendriyanto, Agus Hendry Putra, Hendry Heny Kusumayanti Heri Triluqman Budisantoso Herlina, Meri Hermanu Joebagio Heru Kurniawan Hibnu Nugroho Hidayatulloh, Taufiq Hodiyanto, Hodiyanto I Gusti Bagus Wiksuana I N. Widiasa Ida Hayu Dwimawanti Ignata Noviantari Sinar Y, Ignata Noviantari Imam Faizin, Imam Imam Prasetyo Imam Sujadi Indarto Indarto Iqbal Syaichurrozi Ira Kurniawati Irene Endah Tri Winihati Irfan Zidni1, Muhammad Irma Lusi Nugraheni Isnandar Slamet, Isnandar Isnawati Isnawati istiqomah istiqomah Istiqomah, Layli Nur Itsna Farida Jani, Jani Jayawarsa, A.A. Ketut Johan, Riche Chyntia Juwita Rini Kana Hidayati Karamang, Syukur Kartono, Kartono Katherine Her Pratiwi Khadafi Indrawan Khadijah Khadijah Khafittulloh Viqriah, Khafittulloh Khamsatul Faizati, Khamsatul Kharisma Ardhy W Khoerul Anwar KHOIRUL ANAM Kiki Kurniawan Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati, Kiki Riska Ayu Kinanti, Hidayah Arum Kiswanto, Andre Kiswanto, Andre Komariyatun, Eny Kristanti, Arin Ike Kuat Puji Prayitno Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono Kusnilawati, Nunik Kusumawardani, Rahma Desta Kusumawardani, Seftia Kuwat Slamet, Kuwat Laelusifah, Laelusifah Lestari, Resta Lina Muawanah, Lina Lirëza, Linert LMS Kristiyanti, LMS LMS. Kristiyanti Luqman Buchori M. Ari Wuryanto M. Fakih M. Ilham Fredian Syah , M. Ilham M. Ridlo Yuwono Ridlo M. USMAN Ma'rifatulloh, Dicky Ma'ruf, Muhammad Hasan Mahani, Ibud Mahfudin, Ains Eka Mahmudah Titi Muanifah Malicia Evendia Mardodo Mardodo Mariay, Ivonne F. Marita, Iklia Mariyah Eka Pratiwi, Mariyah Eka Mariyani, Anjar Martini Martini Maryam, Isnaeni Marylin Junias, Marylin Marzuki Marzuki Mashudi Mashudi Masro?ah, 'Izzatul Mateus Sakundarno Adi, Mateus Sakundarno Matin, Hashfi Hawali Abdul Mawarni, Arum Maya Kartika Sari Misgiono Misgiono, Misgiono Mohammad Nasir, Mohammad Mohammad Zen Rahfiludin Muhamad Safa’udin, Muhamad Muhammad Akhyar Muhammad Nasir Muhammad Rido Muhammad Rifai Muhammad Rifqi Muhtadi Muhtadi Muji Slamet Lestari, Muji Slamet Muliasari, Dewi Muliyadi Muliyadi Mursid Rahardjo Mursid Raharjo Musa Musa Nabiha, Puteri Inandin Najikhah , Fatikhatun Nanang Nabhar Fakhri Auliya, Nanang Nabhar Nanda Noor Fadjrin, Nanda Noor Nani Suwarni Nasrin Nasrin, Nasrin Nasrokhatun Diniah, Bibit Nata, Delvia Putri Neni Mariana Niki Astorina Yunita Dewanti, Niki Astorina Yunita Nila Kurniasih Ningrum, Dwi Ayu Nirwana, Nita Noverita Dian T, Noverita Dian Novia Fajar Utami Noviana, Yuita Tri Novita, Maryana Nugraha, Ferry Satya Adi Nugroho Arif Sudibyo Nugroho, Muhamad Asif Cahya Aji Nugroho, Norcha Satria Adi Nuha, Nabila Ulin Nunuk Suryani Nur Endah Wahyuningsih Nur Fajria Safarina, Ismi Nur Faqih, Mochamad Nur Hasanah, Ria Siti Nurani Nurani Nurbani, Agung Nurfitri Astuti Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati Nurjazuli Nurjazuli Nurlaela, Latifah Nurul Aziza, Nurul NURUL AZIZAH Nurul Farhin Nurviana, Vina Nuswantari, Nuswantari Octarina Hidayatus Sholikhah Onny Setiani Othman, Nur Hidayati Paga, Bertha Ollin Paminto, Joko Paminto, Joko Pardana Wati, Sri Laksmi Perdana, Muhammad Faza Permatasari, Nisa Pertiwi, Anita Prabowo, Joko Setyo Pradana, Danindra Bagas Pradana, Danindra Bagas Pradana, Mochamad Agung Prapsilo, Restu Agus Prasetyo Budi Darmono pratiwi, hasih Pratiwi, Hasih Prihanti, Rheni Primadi Bagus Saputro Priyanto, Teguh Puastuti, Dwi Puji Nugraheni Purna Bayu Nugroho Purwanto Purwanto Pusaka, Semerdanta Pusfitra, Susi Puspitasari, Dio Putra Adi Wibowo Putri, Latifah Eka Putri, Vilentia Sindy Hermadianti Putri, Yunisha Dena Rachmani, Ayu Shafira Rahayuningtyas, Indah Rahma Kurnia Sri Utami Rahmat Winata Rahmita Ika Sari Rakhman, Dani Raodatul Jannah Ratih Kusumaningrum Ratna Januarita Ratri, Sari Dwika Religiana, Mergy Religiana, Mergy Reny Yesiana Resiandi, Arida Retno Anggraheni Retno Wahyuningsih Reza Kusuma Setyansah, Reza Kusuma Rianto, Muhammad Richo Riawan Yudi Purwoko Riestianty, Riestianty Rigianti, Henry Aditia Rika Adi Kusumo, Rika Adi Riki Andriatna Riki Tri Kurniawan, Riki Tri Rinawati Rinawati Riyadi Riyadi Riza Ayuningtyas, Riza Rizky, M. Affan Rizqi Khoirunnisa Robia Astuti Rofiah, Nurul Hidayati Rohmah, Anita Khoiri Rosahada, Ailsa Devina Rosaini, Rosaini Rosana Rosana Rosiana, Tina Rosiana, Tina Ruba, Yohanes Emanuel Rukmini Rukmini Rumainum, Inna Martha S Siswanto Sa'idah, Ulya Sabila, Attina Surya Safa’udin, Muhamad Safitri, Eliya Salman Paris Harahap Salsabila, Unik Hanifah Sanat Dia, Sanat Sanusi Sanusi Saputra, Whin Themas Mico Sari, Gustia Paramitha Sari, Putri Permata Sariyasni, Sariyasni Sariyasni, Sariyasni Sariyatun Sariyatun Satrio Wicaksono Sudarman Sebastianus Widanarto Prijowuntato, Sebastianus Widanarto Seno Johari Septi Wulandari Septo Pawelas Arso Setiani, Ony Setiawan, Feri Setiawan, Sofiyan Setya Wahyudi Setyo Prabowo, Joko Shanti Indah Lestari, Shanti Indah Sholeh Muntasyir Sholichatun Aisyah Rahmawati, Sholichatun Aisyah Sigit Saptono Silmi, Rhaniya Sisca Fajriani Siswo Sumardiono Siti Kunarti SITI RACHMAWATI Siti Uswatun Hasanah Solly Aryza Sri Hartati Ningsih Sri Hartini Sri Laksmi Pardanawati, Sri Laksmi Sri Pawiti, Sri Pawiti Sri Subanti Sri Sumiyati Sri Yamtinah Stacia Reviany Mege Suci Irawati Sudarma, Sudarma Sudarmi Sudarmi Sudarno Sudarno Sudarno utomo Sugih Wijayati, Sugih Sugiman Sugiman Sugiyarta Stanislaus, Sugiyarta Suhada, Ahmad Syauqi Suhartono Suherman, Suherman sukardi, sukardi - SULISTIYANI SULISTIYANI SUMADI SUMADI Sumarwati Sunarso Sunarso Sunaryo Sunaryo Supratikta, Hadi Suprihati - Supriyono Supriyono Surjoputro, Antono Suryaningsih, Nurohmah SURYO Budi Santoso Sutanto Sutanto Sutopo Patria Jati Sutrima Sutrima Sutrisno, Sutrisno Suyadi Suyadi Syafrudin Syafrudin Syaiful Anwar Syamsul Arifin Syamsulhuda BM Tardi Tardi Taufik, Opik Tenang Haryanto Thaib, Fachri Tika Karlina R Titi Prihatin Tri Joko Tri Retnaningsih Soeprobowati Tri Wahyuningsih Tri Widyastuti Tuakong, Wigberta Mogi Tuhumena, Veronica L. Tulus Junanto Tutuk Djoko Kusworo UGP, Rusli Umi Hartati, Umi Umi Supraptinah, Umi Utomo, Dani Puji Vera Dewi Susanti Vera Rosalina Bulu Veronica Sri Wigiyanti Vinta Mariko Malau, Vinta Mariko Wafiyatu Maslahah, Wafiyatu Wahyono, Yoyon Wahyu Kusumaningtyas Wahyu Prihatiningrum Wahyu Romadlhon, Ahmad Wamafma, Ilona M. Wardi Wardi Wawan Kokotiasa, Wawan Wayangkau, Erich C. Wayangkau, Erich Christian Weda Kupita Werdania, Riandhita Eri Wharyanti Ika Purwaningsih, Wharyanti Ika Wicaksono, Bhayu Widhanarto, Ghanis Putra Widiastuti, Yulia Widyawati Widyawati Wihasti Imas Priyandani, Wihasti Imas Wijaya, David Sura Wikan Budi Utami Windriya, Anafil Windyandari, Aulia Windyandari Wirdiarti, Nuni Wiryanto Wiryanto Wulandari, Arum Nur Y Noenoek Andrijanti Yadi Ardiawan Yarmaidi Yarmaidi Yeti Sumiyati Yudanto, Yusuf Arya Yudi Pramono Pawiro, Yudi Pramono Yuli Budiati Yuli Kurniawati Sugiyo Pranoto, Yuli Kurniawati Sugiyo Yuli Utanto Yulia Neta . Yuliana, Dwi Yulianti, Fina Yuliyanti , Fina Yulyoni, Finni Yunita Wulandari Yusdiyanto Yusdiyanto Yusim, Adi Kurniawan Yusniar Hanani Yusniar Hanani D., Yusniar Yusniar Hanani Darundiati Yuyut Ariyanto, Yuyut Zainnur Wijayaanto Zainu, Danif Zamroni Zamroni Zuhdha Basofi Nugroho, Zuhdha Basofi Zulkarnain Ridlwan Zulkarnain Zulkarnain